WSJ asks: "Are vaccines fueling new covid variants?"

Source: (https://bit.ly/3ZgBAoJ)
There is another new covid "variant" (or so we are told) that
is spreading across the Northeast. And The Wall Street Journal
(WSJ) admits that covid "vaccines" (https://archive.md/KwuFU)
are making people more susceptible to it.
XBB, as they are calling this latest variant, is not necessarily any
deadlier than previous variants. It is also a lot different, we are
told, than previous variants in that it evades "protection" from the
injections.
"Growing evidence also suggests that repeated vaccinations may
make people more susceptible to XBB and could be fueling the
virus's rapid evolution," writes Allysia Finley, admitting what many
of us have known for years now.
XBB supposedly belongs to the Omicron (anagram for Moronic)
family of variants, which comes with "numerous descendants,"
according to Finley, "many of which have popped up in different
regions of the world curiously bearing some of the same mutations."
A study published on December 19 explains that the rapid and
simultaneous emergence of all these variants possessing "enormous
growth advantages is unprecedented." The reason, we now know,
is the jabs.
"Under selective evolutionary pressures, the virus appears to have
developed mutations that enable it to transmit more easily and
escape antibodies elicited by vaccines and prior infection," Finley
clarifies.
Another study (https://bit.ly/3XfAyre) currently in pre-print
contains similar revelations. This one looked at the so-called
bivalent "booster" jab for covid, which authorities are pushing
on the masses as the solution to all the new variants.
Workers at the Cleveland Clinic were used to assess the efficacy
of bivalent boosters, which were found to provide "modest
protection." The key sentence in that study, though, is one
specifying that "the virus strains dominant in the community were
those represented in the vaccine."
This would seem to suggest that the variants supposedly covered
by bivalent boosters at any given time just so happen to be the very
same ones that continue to spread like wildfire, particularly among
the "fully vaccinated."
In Finley's article, it is further admitted that covid "vaccines"
provide poor and inadequate protection against new "strains" of the
virus that come along.
As opposed to natural immunity, which is generalized, jab "immunity"
is strain-specific (or so we are told), meaning when new strains come
along there is no available protection against them.
"Bivalent vaccines that target the Wuhan and BA.5 variants (or
breakthrough infections with the latter) prompt the immune system
to produce antibodies that target viral regions the two strains have
in common," Finley writes.
"XBB has evolved to elude antibodies induced by the vaccines and
breakthrough infections."
This "immune imprinting" caused by the injections, as they are
calling it, was also addressed in a New England Journal of Medicine
(NEJM) study published last month. That one, along with another
one published this month in Cell, both show that those who get
injected are only protected against older strains of the virus
because their immune systems were imprinted, aka damaged,
to not generally recognize all mutations of viral invaders.
"A bivalent booster only slightly increased antibodies against XBB,"
Finley writes. "Experts nevertheless claim that boosters improve
protection against XBB. That's disinformation, to use their favored
term."
"It might not be a coincidence that XBB surged this fall in
Singapore, which has among the highest vaccination and booster
rates in the world. Over the past several weeks a XBB strain has
become predominant in New York, New Jersey, Connecticut and
Massachusetts, making up about three-quarters of virus samples
that have been genetically sequenced."