Of WHAT did Queen Elizabeth die?
At the risk of seeming crass at this Sad Moment (which "our
free press" will now embellish with their usual restraint and
dignity), I urge that we remember, in the days and weeks to
come, that (1) Queen Elizabeth (reportedly) was triple- "vaccinated,"
and (2) then, roughly one year later, caught "COVID," which she
(reportedly) had trouble getting over (assuming she got over it);
and (3) now she's dead.
I think we should remember those three facts, since "our free press"
clearly wants us to forget both (1) and (2), screaming-with their
usual lucidity and honesty-that Her Majesty was not killed by
her "vaccination." Here's the "evidence" that she most certainly
was not, as marshaled by the Einsteins at Politifact:
Her son, now King Charles, said in a statement posted on Twitter
that he and his family "mourn profoundly the passing of a cherished
Sovereign and a much-loved Mother." He didn't mention the
COVID-19 vaccine.
Elizabeth and her late husband, Prince Philip, were first vaccinated
against COVID-19 in January 2021. She tested positive for COVID-19
about a year later. News reports then noted that she had been fully
vaccinated and received a booster shot by the time of her diagnosis.
In the months since, media reported on health issues affecting the
queen - especially COVID-19 - but there was nothing about a vaccine
endangering her life.
https://bit.ly/3QG1iNO
And so the Queen could not have died of any "vaccine" injury, since,
if she had, King Charles would certainly have "mentioned" it
yesterday-just as, when she came down with "COVID" after her
injections, the media would certainly have said that that the
"vaccine" was now "endangering her life." Case closed.
What's notable about that "case," aside from its jaw-dropping
stupidity, is its sly avoidance of the fact that Elizabeth's "late
husband, Prince Philip" had, four months after his first
"vaccination," died, at 99. Of what? Here's what StyleCaster
reported five days later:
Prince Philip's official cause of death hasn't been revealed by
Buckingham Palace yet, but many believe that his declining health
could've been a result of a recent infection and heart issue. On
February 16, a spokesperson for Buckingham Palace confirmed that
Philip has been admitted to King Edward VII's Hospital in London
as a "precautionary measure." A week later, Buckingham Palace
reported that Philip was in the hospital for an infection. The palace
confirmed that the infection was unrelated to the novel coronavirus,
which he and the Queen had been vaccinated against in January 2021.
So, five weeks after his first (and last) "vaccination," Philip was
admitted to the hospital for treatment of "a recent infection and
heart issue"-problems "unrelated" to COVID-19, "which he and the
Queen had been vaccinated against in January 2021." Thus
"the palace" inadvertently revealed, to readers brighter than the
nitwits at Politifact, that Philip's fatal illness surely was not
"unrelated" to that "vaccination"-just as the Queen's last illness
could have been induced by her three "COVID shots."
Now, it's possible, of course, that neither one of them was actually
injected, any more than Dr. Fauci or Bill Gates, or Gavin Newsom,
or Justin Trudeau, actually got jabbed. If the royal couple, like
those others, only feigned their "vaccination," then one might ask
exactly what kind of "infection" and/or "heart issue" carried Philip
off, and how Elizabeth came down with "COVID." I have a friend
in Britain who suspects that they were killed so as to further
normalize the "sudden death" of older people-a paranoid idea,
perhaps, though there's no doubt that this relentless "vaccination"
drive has had precisely that effect, as countless elderly have been
"dying suddenly" in unprecedented numbers these past 18 months;
and all too many (younger) people-including readers of this
column-shrug it off as not that big a deal.
Talk about crass. The notion that it's not so bad for older folks to
be killed off before their time, regardless of their fitness and
vitality, is one that the eugenicists of yesteryear embraced, and
that their psychopathic heirs have been promoting for some
time-like, for example, Dr. Ezekiel Emanuel, a "bio-ethicist"
whose "Why I Hope to Die at 75" raised something of a stink
(though nowhere near as big a stink as it deserved) when it ran
in The Atlantic in 2014, foretelling the catastrophe that rolled out
six years later, and that's been killing countless older people in
particular-so many, and so flagrantly, that one might easily define
the COVID crisis, from the outset, as a deliberate global exercise
in what Dr. Vernon Coleman has called eldercide.
https://bit.ly/3QFrVCN
One might compare this systematic cull of "useless eaters" to Aktion
T4, the Nazi program of involuntary euthanasia to cleanse Germany
of children with disabilities; except that this program is vastly
larger, hasn't stopped (Aktion T4 ended quickly, once the Church
protested it)-and far more perverse, since Hitler et al. never
feigned concern for the disabled, whereas this global eldercide was
mounted in the name of "keeping Grandma safe."
Under that sentimental cover, the Eichmanns of the COVID crisis
quickly managed to exterminate old people in large numbers. They
did it through the lockdowns that kept countless elderly in isolation
from their families, causing, in April, 2020, a sharp uptick in
excess mortality, due mainly to deaths of des
air (as Denis Rancourt showed early on). They did it through the
criminal warehousing of COVID patients throughout nursing homes
in New York, California, Michigan, Washington and North Carolina,
as well as the UK and Canada, leading to a special boom in COVID
deaths for which no one has been held accountable. (Gov. Cuomo
was ejected not for that mass murder in his state, but for sexual
harassment.) They did it by denying countless older people proper
treatment, and intubating them instead-a practice estimated to have
killed 90% of those elderly hooked up to ventilators (based on
a lethal protocol devised in China, and which the WHO then
recommended to the world). They did it by outright euthanizing
of the elderly, most notably in Britain, through the swift
administration of midazolam, so as to put them all to sleep, and
thereby save the state a fortune in retirement benefits and medical
expenses-a great financial boon that surely also influenced the
overseers of other "democratic" countries, including Italy, whose
aged population has been gradually slaughtered, from the
lockdowns through the ongoing "vaccination" drive-and so it's been
elsewhere throughout the world.
It's not for us, or anyone, to say that people of a certain age
should die, already, never mind whatever economic benefits such
termination yields. Even Queen Elizabeth, who died at 96, had every
right to figure she might live to 99, like Philip-or 101, like her
own sturdy mother. I make this point in full awareness of the
Windsors' own eugenicist affinities-as evidenced by Philip's heinous
quip from 2009, which flashed all over "social media" upon his
death: ""In the event that I am reincarnated, I would like to return
as a deadly virus, to contribute something to solving
overpopulation." Although he's far too smooth to say a thing like
that (in public), King Charles III is just as keen on "solving
overpopulation"-as is his son Prince William, who, just last year,
infamously bitched about how "overpopulation" throughout Africa
is hurting wildlife there. (William has three children.) And now,
at 73, the Prince of Wales can finally step outside his mother's
shadow as King Charles III-a title whose prestige is likely to
enhance his efforts to depopulate the world, along with such
fanatics as Bill Gates (who also has three children) and Klaus
Schwab.
1)
https://bit.ly/3ByI88u
2)
https://bit.ly/3Dmans8
3)
https://bit.ly/3d58CVT
And those of us who don't believe in an untimely death for anyone
must- therefore-keep on working to indict all those who organized
the COVID crisis to put all the rest of us to death before our time.
Their systematic murder of the old must no more be forgotten, or
forgiven, than the countless other murders they've committed, and
are still committing now.
Queen Elizabeth II, the monarch who brought stability to a changing
nation September 8, 2022
In recent years, the queen had taken on fewer public duties,
occasionally canceling appearances in which her attendance was
once tradition. Mobility issues had troubled her in recent months,
and she had taken to spending much of her time at Windsor Castle,
the family's country estate near London, and at Balmoral, the castle
in Scotland.
In February, she contracted COVID-19, which she later described
as leaving her "very tired and exhausted."
https://n.pr/3Lat83O
Queen Elizabeth II has tested positive for COVID-19
Buckingham Palace said Sunday, Feb. 20, 2022 that Queen Elizabeth
II tested positive for COVID-19, has mild symptoms and will continue
with duties.
LONDON - Queen Elizabeth II tested positive for COVID-19 on
Sunday and is experiencing mild, cold-like symptoms, Buckingham
Palace said, adding that the famously stoic 95-year-old monarch still
plans to carry on working. The diagnosis prompted concern and
get-well wishes from across Britain's political spectrum.
Britain's longest-reigning monarch and a fixture in the life of the
nation, the queen reached the milestone of 70 years on the throne
on Feb. 6, the anniversary of the 1952 death of her father, King
George VI. She will turn 96 on April 21.
The palace said the queen, who has been fully vaccinated and had
a booster shot, would continue with "light" duties at Windsor Castle
over the coming week.
"She will continue to receive medical attention and will follow all
the appropriate guidelines," the palace said in a statement.
https://n.pr/3U35QAW
