5G poses health risks; humans must limit exposure to EMF, RF

Without a doubt, 5G carries with it health risks
(https://bbc.in/2YUcIDA). Doctors, researchers and scientists
know about it and the general public is aware of the dangers
the fifth-generation mobile network poses to humans.
Unfortunately, there's no way to avoid the 5G technology completely
as they're practically everywhere in modern society. From cellphones
to microwave ovens, to smart gadgets and appliances, exposure to
electromagnetic fields (EMF) and radiofrequency (RF) radiation
is inevitable.
Since nobody knows exactly how much (https://bit.ly/3RxNZQI)
5G millimeter Wave the fragile body can withstand without serious
repercussions, it's best to limit the exposure to acceptable world
levels.
Even the Federal Communications Commission (FCC), which was
tasked to regulate interstate and international communications by
radio, television, wire and cable, admits there are no 5G studies
funded by the agency in this regard and that none are planned.
The lack of reference materials with regard to the health risks
involving 5G is appalling. As of August 1, there were more than
35,000 articles on EMFs, but only seven of them are medical
or biological studies. Clearly, the FCC is being controlled by the
telecom industry and is in no hurry to know the extent of possible
5G effects like skin and ocular melanoma and sterility as it would
alarm the public (https://bit.ly/2oSxwP7).
Private entities, however, have taken the initiative to conduct
studies and have uncovered some worrisome facts.
Long and frequent use of cellphones can cause mitochondrial
dysfunction and nuclear DNA damage from free radicals.
Likewise, excessive exposure to Wi-Fi networks has been linked
to chronic diseases, such as cardiac arrhythmias, anxiety,
depression, autism, Alzheimer's and infertility.
Probable health damages extend to plants, animals
In 2015, more than 230 international scientists appealed to the
United Nations for protection from prolonged EMF exposure.
They noted that probable damages aren't confined to humans, as
"there is growing evidence of harmful effects to both plant and
animal life."
The effects, on the other hand, "include increased cancer risk,
cellular stress, increase in harmful free radicals, genetic damages,
structural and functional changes of the reproductive system,
learning and memory deficits, neurological disorders and negative
impacts on general well-being in humans."
In September 2017, more than 180 scientists and doctors from
35 countries called for a moratorium on 5G "until potential hazards
for human health and the environment have been fully investigated
by scientists independent from industry." (https://bit.ly/3TCtX9q)
They stressed that "RF-EMF has been proven to be harmful to
humans and the environment," and that "5G will substantially
increase exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic fields on
top of the 2G, 3G, 4G, Wi-Fi, etc. for telecommunications already
in place."
Scientists want to halt 5G deployment until health issues are
investigated
Some scientists and analysts wanted to slow down 5G deployment
or stop its employment till health issues are resolved.
Concerned individuals like Martin Bouygues, the CEO of French
telecoms firm Bouygues, has joined the call for governments to
postpone auctions for 5G frequencies (https://bit.ly/3cDPmhZ),
citing the ongoing Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic and
public mistrust of the technology.
Countries like Belgium and Switzerland heeded the call and are
delaying their 5G rollout in order to create a system to monitor
radiation. Some areas like Syracuse, New York and New Hampshire
have safeguards in place while Mill Valley, near San Francisco,
banned new 5G wireless cells.
Unfortunately, more areas went along with the "5G is safe" line
espoused by the FCC and the Cellular Telecommunications and
Internet Association (CTIA), which is the United States wireless
industry trade association.