Medical media: CENSORING all vaccine adverse reactions

Since the COVID-19 pandemic began, this publication has provided
ample documentation and evidence that the globalist elites are using
to fundamentally alter Western democracies in ways they never could
legislatively.
One way has been to use the virus as a means of curbing civil
liberties and constitutionally protected freedoms to limit
individualist activity and force conformity, as evidenced by vaccine
mandates, forced business lockdowns and closures, masking
requirements, and other measures.
But another way the globalist elite are changing our societies using
the virus as their impetus is through the employment of propaganda
and censorship, as evidenced by a recent incident involving a
researcher who was attempting to document adverse reactions to
COVID-19 vaccines.
Jessica Rose didn’t ask for any of this. She started to analyze data
on adverse reactions after COVID-19 vaccines simply as an exercise
to master a new piece of software. But she couldn’t ignore what she
saw and decided to publish the results of her analysis. The next
thing she knew, she was in a “bizzarro world,” she told The Epoch
Times (https://bit.ly/3LVfUaF).
A paper she co-authored based on her analysis was withdrawn by the
academic journal Elsevier under circumstances that raised eyebrows
among her colleagues. The journal declined to comment on the matter.
Mind you, Rose isn’t an amateur or a conspiracy theorist; she
received a Ph.D. in computational biology from Bar-Ilan University
in Israel, and upon completion of her post-doctoral studies on
molecular dynamics of certain proteins, she wanted to take on
something new.
To that end, she switched to a new statistical computing software in
a bid to discover a new and interesting data set she could use to
hone her skills, settling on the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting
System (VAERS) in the U.S., which is a database containing reports
of problems that have occurred with certain vaccines that may or may
not have been caused by the jab.
She went into the project with a clear mind, not a predetermined
outcome, saying, “I don’t go in with questions.”
But what she discovered disturbed her, she said.
The reporting system has been around since 1990 and was actually
established to be an early warning apparatus for problematic
vaccines. Anyone can submit reports, but they are then checked for
duplicates and accuracy. Mostly though, the reports are filed by
health professionals; most commonly, there are roughly 40,000
reports per year and several hundred deaths involving vaccines.
However, after COVID vaccines were introduced, reports skyrocketed.
By Jan. 7, there were more than 1 million reports including around
21,000 deaths. Other notable conditions and reactions reported
include: 11,000 heart attacks; almost 13,000 Bell’s palsy cases;
and more than 25,000 instances of myocarditis (inflammation
of the heart muscle itself) or pericarditis (inflammation of the
pericardial sac around the heart).
In discovering the data, Rose said it was alarming to her,
but worse,
she found, some experts were essentially dismissing the
alarming findings.
“Clearly, there’s no concern [among these authorities and
experts] for people who are suffering adverse events,” she
said, according to The Epoch Times.
The most common pushback on the VAERS data regarding
COVID-19 vaccines is that the reports are unreliable and
unverified, but Rose said those arguments miss the point since
VAERS was never set up to provide definitive answers about
problems regarding vaccines — only to provide officials and
policymakers with an early warning system. And that’s what’s
happening with the COVID-19 vaccines, she says.
“It’s emitting so many safety signals and they’re being ignored,”
she said.
She decided to team up with Dr. Peter McCullough, an internist,
cardiologist and epidemiologist, to write a paper on VAERS
reports of myocarditis occurring in youth, an issue with COVID
vaccines that has already been acknowledged but only as a ‘rare’
occurrence (it isn’t).
As of July 9, 2021, the researchers discovered 559 VAERS reports
of myocarditis, 97 of which involved children ages 12-15, and while
it’s not clear how many of those are directly related to the vaccine,
it was obvious to the researchers that the COVID jabs cannot be
discounted.
“Within 8 weeks of the public offering of COVID-19 products to
the 12–15-year-old age group, we found 19 times the expected
number of myocarditis cases in the vaccination volunteers over
background myocarditis rates for this age group,” the paper said
(https://bit.ly/3FrT2NM).
However, “after two weeks, on Oct. 15, the paper disappeared from
the Elsevier website, replaced by a notice of ‘Temporary Removal.’
Not only weren’t the authors told why, they weren’t informed at all,
according to Rose,” The Epoch Times reports.
“It’s unprecedented in the eyes of all of my colleagues,” she said.