Toxicology expert warns mRNA COVID jabs
Source: (
https://bit.ly/3Yir8fU)
In a Wednesday roundtable discussion hosted by US Sen. Ron
Johnson, Dr. Janci Lindsay said there is no way that we can say
at this point that they are safe nor effective.'
A toxicology expert with over 30 years of scientific experience
issued a stark warning Wednesday about the potential reproductive
harm she believes could be caused by the mRNA COVID jabs.
She said more research is needed to determine the shots' effects
on reproduction.
In a Wednesday roundtable discussion hosted by U.S. Sen. Ron
Johnson of Wisconsin, Dr. Janci Lindsay warned that the COVID-19
jabs could "potentially sterilize an entire generation" or else "be
passed on to next generations as inadvertent gene transfer."
Accordingly, Lindsay argued that it is "absolutely irresponsible
to continue any of these shots" for children and people
of child-bearing age "without investigating this," explaining "there
is no way that we can say at this point that they are safe nor
effective."
She ended her short address by calling for an investigation into
the jabs' potential danger to human reproduction.
Dr. Janci Lindsay holds a PhD in Biochemistry and Molecular
Biology from the University of Texas Graduate School of Biomedical
Sciences, and serves as the Director of Toxicology and Molecular
Biology for consulting firm Toxicology Support Services, LLC.
in Sealy, Texas.
According to her company's website, Lindsay boasts "extensive
experience in analyzing the molecular profile of pharmacologic
responses as they pertain to the dose/response relationship." The
medical professional has also conducted risk assessments and
evaluated "the toxicological profile of a variety of consumer and
industrial products," according to her profile.
At the Wednesday discussion, where she was joined by the likes
of Dr. Peter McCullough and Dr. Robert Malone, Lindsay said
that the Pfizer and Moderna COVID shots don't just stay in the
arm at the injection site, but rather spread throughout the body.
"We were told initially that it would just stay in the arm, but it
does not. It ends up being distributed throughout the entire body
for both Moderna and Pfizer," she said, adding the "caveat" that
Moderna's jab contents haven't been found in the kidneys.
"Now, what are those tissues? The brain, the spleen, the endocrine
glands, the bone marrow, the blood preferentially, the ovaries and
the testes," she continued. "Now, what happens when gene
therapies get to the ovaries and the testes? Well, we just don't
know because unfortunately it hasn't been adequately studied."
According to Lindsay, the jabs have the "potential to cause
immense reproductive harm and potentially sterilize an entire
generation."
"This has not been looked into and it must be looked into," Lindsay
said. "I am demanding now that this be investigated."
Lindsay's arguments pushing back against the prevailing narrative
regarding COVID-19 shots have unsurprisingly been met with
criticism. Health fact-check site HealthFeedback reported that
Lindsay's arguments were "inaccurate," explaining that "COVID-19
vaccines aren't gene therapy as they cannot modify human DNA,"
and that "COVID-19 vaccines don't cause any fertility problems
in men or women."
However, not all experts agree that the mRNA jabs are not actually
gene therapies.
In September of last year, mRNA technology pioneer Dr. Robert
W. Malone argued that the use of mRNA in COVID jabs amounts
to "gene therapy applied to vaccines", and backed up the concerns
of skeptics who he said "have a right to be wary about a new
technology that is not well understood," LifeSiteNews previously
reported.
Meanwhile in October 2021, the president of Bayer's Pharmaceuticals
Division called the mRNA technology found in Pfizer and Moderna's
COVID shots a "cell and gene therapy", and joked that without the
appearance of the coronavirus the general public wouldn't have
rolled up their sleeves to take it.
"If we had surveyed two years ago in the public - would you be
willing to take a gene or cell therapy and inject it into your body?'
- we probably would have had a 95% refusal rate," he said.
