21st Century Robber Barons: the WEF

Source: (https://bit.ly/3uDDTnJ)
In the 1870s, the term "robber baron" was first used to describe an
exploitative class of industrialists who utilized their wealth to
create monopolies of resources and amass control in the fledgling
United States.  The name describes an illegitimate aristocracy of
unelected plutocrats.  John D. Rockefeller, Cornelius Vanderbilt,
Andrew Carnegie; all American industrial royalty whose names
line the streets of America and the pages of our history books.
One hundred fifty years later, we face a new global class of robber
barons.
Once a year, the world's richest and most influential people meet
behind closed doors in Davos, Switzerland, to discuss the future
direction of the globe. Known as the World Economic Forum, they
were originally founded in 1971 by German engineer Klaus Schwab.
Look at any major global policy push in recent history, and you'll
likely find the fingerprints of the World Economic Forum. From
climate alarmism to ESG investing to our obsession with
sustainability and population control or a push for centralized and
authoritarian government, we find the handiwork of the World
Economic Forum.
Earlier this year, a video surfaced of Mr. Schwab in 2017, openly
bragging about infiltrating the cabinets of major governments
worldwide by grooming a class of Young Global Leaders, including
Angela Merkel of Germany, Justin Trudeau of Canada, and even
Vladimir Putin.  The World Economic Forum describes its Young
Global Leaders program as "an accelerator for a dynamic community
of exceptional people with the vision, courage, and influence to
drive positive change in the world." It is doubtful that their vision
for positive change aligns with that of the plebian class, but they
aren't too concerned with that.  In 2016, they told us in Forbes
magazine that soon we would own nothing, have no privacy, and
we would learn to like it.
The World Economic Forum's Young Global Leaders collective is
a veritable who's-who of politicians, tech titans, corporate
executives, philanthropists, celebrities, and financiers worldwide.
You don't have to look far to find their influence.  In the United
States, we find their people in finance at organizations like
Blackrock, Blackstone, Goldman Sachs, CitiBank, and Mastercard.
In technology, we find their people at Facebook, Google, Wikipedia,
Microsoft, Amazon, and more. In the media, they're at Fox, CNN,
CBS, Forbes, Bloomberg, the NY Times, and the Washington Post.
In government, they hold governorships, congressional seats,
mayorships, federal cabinet positions, and more. At the
universities, they're presidents, faculty, lecturers, and researchers.
There is no sector they do not touch.
Every extreme policy push in America of the last five years overlaps
with the objectives and people of the World Economic Forum.
The neo-Marxist Critical Race Theory push following the death
of George Floyd?  Ibram X. Kendi is a Young Global Leader.
Environmental Social Governance investing? The World Economic
Forum counts dozens of ESG executives from financial firms among
its members.  Financial firms like Blackrock outbidding residential
home buyers for residential properties? This aligns with their
objective to create a tenant class.  Visa, Mastercard, and American
Express pushing for a backdoor gun registry in the U.S. All WEF
partners as well.
In 2020, President Donald Trump was invited to speak at Davos
for what can only be described as an opportunity to put a face to
the enemy and embolden the modern robber barons.  He spoke
openly of the need to reject the doomsday prophets of the World
Economic Forum and to emulate the successes of America First.
It was likely a part of their unfolding plan to depose him.
Following the 2020 election, brazen conspirators described their
organization's work in overthrowing Donald Trump in a TIME
Magazine piece, in which they described their work as "fortifying
democracy."  They detailed their structure as a bipartisan effort
of media, technology, government, and corporate interests. In
2018, TIME was purchased by Marc Benioff, co-founder and CEO
of Salesforce.com and World Economic Forum Young Global
Leader. Does this sound familiar?  Without outing themselves
directly, it sure sounds like the World Economic Forum is that
cabal, and their history demonstrates their intent.
In 2016, when the outgoing Obama Administration participated
in surveillance of the incoming Trump Administration, it was
U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations Samantha Power who
was caught unmasking the communications of Trump transition
team officials.  She's a Young Global Leader.  From John Durham's
special counsel investigation, it was found that during Russiagate,
the Georgia Institute of Technology was tasked with surveilling
the internet traffic of the White House.  Their current president,
Angel Cabrera, the former chair of their board of advisors, is
a Young Global Leader.
COVID-19 was the pretext for hijacking American elections and
ousting Donald Trump, and every piece of the global pandemic
response touched the World Economic Forum. In October 2019,
Johns Hopkins University and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation
ran coronavirus pandemic modeling exercises at Event201 several
weeks before COVID dropped in Wuhan, China.  Both organizations
are partners of the World Economic Forum and are full of Young
Global Leaders.
The U.S. COVID response was predicated on vaccines and only
vaccines being a solution, to the point of demonizing even the
testing of off-label therapeutics. It was Pfizer who got the green
light with falsely touted ninety-five percent effective COVID shots.
Pfizer is a partner of the World Economic Forum and is represented
by Young Global Leaders. When they withheld their promising but
false study results until the day after the 2020 election, it was clear
the intent was to end Donald Trump's re-election chances.
The insanity of the past half-decade is most aptly described as shock
and awe.  Shock and awe is an offensive warfare tactic that describes
an assault from all angles that does not permit the opponent a chance
to mount a defense because they are spread thin across all fronts.
Shock and awe is disorienting and does not allow one to discern who
or what is coming at them.  Now that the dust has settled, it is
clear that few, if any, global organizations have the capacity, the
reach, and the motivation of the World Economic Forum to perpetrate
the shock and awe we've experienced.  No free state can tolerate its
continued existence.