4th world war of Russia against the West

In 2007, in Munich, Putin delivered a speech denouncing the
wickedness of the West. He blamed the EU and the US for the
collapse of the USSR. This speech was the declaration of the
4th World War to the West.
According to the Kremlin ideology, Russia lost the 3rd world
cold war. Since 2007, a new 4th world hybrid war has been
going on, the purpose of which is to convene a new Yalta
conference and divide the world into spherves of influence.
Russia wants to return colonial rule over the territories of the
former Russian Empire, as well as form protectorates in Central
and Eastern Europe. Russians are sincerely convinced that such
peoples as Czechs, Poles, Hungarians hate Russians for US money.
The Kremlin regime uses a revised Nazi theory to justify colonial
expansion against the Slavic peoples. The Russians claim that
they are supposedly a divided people. And that only US money
is holding back the unification of the Slavs under Moscow control.
To achieve the defeat of the West in World War 4, the Russian
General Staff developed a genius hybrid war strategy. This type of
war implies certain actions of a military and non-military nature
with the aim of destabilizing NATO, the EU and the United States
in particular. The main ideology: stop the expansion of democracy
via the absolute hatred of the United States. In other words,
support for any political groups, regimes, terrorists that do
not share general democratic and human values.
1. Military component
To create tensions around NATO countries, the Kremlin supports
terrorist, ultra-right, radical groups in Africa and the Middle
East. For this, not only direct arms deliveries are used, but also
private military companies associated with the Kremlin. In Lybia,
Russia supports through its mercenaries Field Marshal Haftar.
Russia has created Hamas and Fatah in Palestine since Soviet
times. In Syria, Russia is funding and supplying arms to dictator
Assad. Russian mercenaries are also present in Yemen, Sudan,
as well as in the Central African Republic. This allows maintaining
constant tension on the southern borders of the West, as well as
directing migrant flows to the EU. In fact, create terrorist and
criminal pressure on the southern flank of NATO. Venezuela, Cuba
and Central America also use this strategy. This makes it possible
to constantly maintain pressure on the southern borders of the
United States through the flows of illegal migrants. In this
situation, all communist, militaristic regimes are natural allies of
the Kremlin against the West.
The creation of puppets on the EU borders stands apart. In
Moldova - created is a terrorist communist dictatorship in
Transnistria, a source of smuggling. In Ukraine, this is the
occupation of Crimea, as well as two small artificial puppet
regimes in Donetsk and Luhansk regions. In Georgia, these are
artificial territorial formations of South Ossetia and Abkhazia,
created by the Russian army. Russia's ally, Armenia only recently
lost control over parts of Azerbaijan and Karabakh. With such
an extensive military component, one can not only create tensions
around the EU and NATO, but also control oil prices. Turkey is
Russia's only real rival in the region. They proven in practice they
can contain the Putin regime. Turkey is the only force that
maintains order on the southern borders of NATO.
The best example of hybrid aggression in recent years was shown
by Turkey on the example of Israel. Turkish special services
prepared and organized riots on the Temple Mount in Jerusalem.
Allegedly, the Israeli police are specifically killing Muslims.
Militants disguised as peaceful protesters used women and children
to cover up their actions. Then the Hamas group came into play,
launching rockets at Israel with heavy rocket missiles. When the
Israelis began to defend themselves against shelling, propaganda
videos appeared in the media about how Jews specially kill
Palestinians. But this is a famous hybrid strategy borrowed from
the Russians. Small and well-armed groups of people deploy their
weapons inside residential areas, schools, hospitals and so on.
To get a good propaganda picture that portrays the victim as the
aggressor. This is the main principle of the military part of a
hybrid war. Fire via the backs of civilians. In other words, this is
hostage taking, but on an absolutely larger scale than a bank robbery.
2. Political component
If the state is strong and rich enough, direct military hybrid
aggression cannot be successful. Therefore, in order to destroy
the nation from within, the Russians created a system of political
corruption. The Kremlin regime finances radical extremist groups,
parties, gatherings when they come to power will destabilize the
EU and NATO. Funding is carried out both directly and through
the system of donations and grants. The main criterion for funding
in this case is the attitude towards the United States and the
European Union. The task is to completely discredit Western
institutions and to produce collapse of states from within. To
support such political parties, groups, assemblies, a disinformation
system is used. These are armies of bots on social networks,
bloggers, propaganda media, radical media. It has been proven
that in many cases of unrest in US cities, information was injected
from Russia through the army of bots. Each country has its own set
of sensitive topics causing conflicts. For the United States,
this is a racial issue, for Britain, relations between peoples
within the country. Conflict between Catholics and Protestants.
For Serbia, this is a question of Kosovo and so on. Facts are
known when, for sabotage purposes, Russian agents desecrated
the graves of Hungarians, Jews, Poles in Ukraine in order to
cause a national conflict. There are cases of proven political
murders, as well as actions to provocations interethnic conflicts
in the border areas of the EU. This is all a political piece of a
hybrid war to create tensions within the EU and the US.
3. Cyber terrorism
The most important tool of the 4th world hybrid war is cyber terror.
Together with misinformation, an army of bots on social networks,
it allows causing radical pernicious tendencies in the West. The
point of hybrid war is to destroy the West with its own hands and
technologies. Through the openness and availability of information
and industrial systems, the West is critically vulnerable to cyber
terrorism. I have already written about this many times. The task
of cyber terrorism is not just to spoil something, the task of cyber
terrorism is to cause man-made disasters in Western countries
with millions of victims. This strategy allows the use of proxy
groups to remove direct suspicion to the Kremlin. The point of
hybrid attacks is to gradually destroy the West, as well as test the
boundaries of what is permissible. All attacks in the framework
of the 4th world hybrid war are reported as isolated incidents.
But these multiple and relatively inexpensive attacks create
negative tension not only on the southern borders of the US and
the EU, but also civil conflicts within states. It has been proven
that many of the real "conspiracy theories" were developed in
Russia in troll factories. And then they were thrown into the
information space of the West. To be honest, hybrid warfare is
a war for impoverished countries. But as experience has shown,
it is quite effective against the West, which is forever in the
illusion that all people are brothers.
In this note, I only briefly outlined the principles and tasks
of the 4th world hybrid war. The problem of the West is its
excessive openness to the whole world, as well as its love for
big oil money from dubious countries. The reason for the hatred
of the United States is simple and obvious. American individualism
comes into conflict with the Russian tribal communal clan system.
Human rights and freedoms are too harmful for regimes like the
Kremlin. Therefore, this conflict is not just a rational economic
nature, it is existential, one might say quasi-religious in nature.
In this war, both the EU and the US must himself answer the
question for themselves whether they are ready to die for Narva
for the sake of democracy or not? Because dictatorships do what
they do, because NATO allows them to do it.