Introduction
Introduction Statistics Contact Development Disclaimer Help
Return Create A Forum - Home
---------------------------------------------------------
wows forum
https://wows.createaforum.com
---------------------------------------------------------
*****************************************************
Return to: Currently active games
*****************************************************
#Post#: 3189--------------------------------------------------
Re: Rankedz 24, 9/jul-2/sep, t7-8, t9-10
By: ency Date: July 23, 2025, 3:15 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
Season 24, Sprint 1, sumamry.
Roughly 400 players got to the gold league in S1.
rouhgly 20 certificuates of S1T1.
Those 400 performed typically between 55-60% WR, majority of
them, almost nobdy under 50% WR performance, ultimate
certificate S1R1 owners mainly at WR65% and few rare ones at
WR75%.
You can see 4 pages of data yourself there.
If your intelelct has capabilities then conclude from such data
anything, anything regarding your commntiy religious believes
for example.
https://wows-numbers.com/season/1024,Season-24/?order=current_rank__asc&p=4
[code]
Season 24 - Leaderboard
Player
damage
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
399
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
401
20
20
20
20
20
063
20
20
368
20
20
061
.....
393
393
393
393
393
393
[/code]
#Post#: 3190--------------------------------------------------
Re: Rankedz 24, 9/jul-2/sep, t7-8, t9-10
By: Chaplain1 Date: July 23, 2025, 3:22 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
I can say i played against all those 400 players, all are
familiar.
This is how i spent years in Wows ship game, playing against Top
players in Golds for years.
I really enjoyed that, it is like boxing every day with young
Mike Champion Tyson, instead of every day boxing agaisnt
teenagers in my village.
Up to you, which opponents do you like, children or top
athletes.
#Post#: 3191--------------------------------------------------
Re: Rankedz 24, 9/jul-2/sep, t7-8, t9-10
By: Hanuman Date: July 24, 2025, 3:46 am
---------------------------------------------------------
S1 ended yesterday and issued ca 20 certificates to the 400
players playerbase.
I got a competitive mood and climbed to R6 yesterday, that is
60% of winning in your language.
The data of the Wows 400 skilled players was quite interesting.
Do you know when the playerbase turned from 30 players to 100
and when from 100 to 400? A curve illustrates that, one day i
draw it.
I played against every of those 400 gold skill level playets
obviously, killed obviously plenty of them. And if you look
their data, then in general they all performed at Unicum level,
just go look the data. So, that debunks any Wows community
opinions about Rankedz, and proves all my opinions.
This time S1R1 certificate was even closer to me than ever,
there was 4-5 days left and i had already R2, but then the mood
turned and lost those 4 days, and climbed back to R6 at the last
day. Well 20 players from the whole playerbase managed to get
the sertificate, i killed them nicely and they me, but they used
the time more efficently.
S1 is alwaus tons of dialogs, tins of joy, and S2 little bit
milder but still good spicy. You can see the material i posted
during S1, the screenshots and thoughts, this is the joy you get
from S1. So, if you can't even recall how the recent 10 days in
Randomz were, then why don't you visit Rankedz to start having
the full fun?
#Post#: 3197--------------------------------------------------
Re: Rankedz 24, 9/jul-2/sep, t7-8, t9-10
By: wows Date: July 24, 2025, 10:54 am
---------------------------------------------------------
This seems the best player among 20 of players who got S1R1
sertificate. You can see his ship choices for S1 and
contenplate. Surely one thing you see that the Top 1 feature
called RadarKilling was in his ship choices as Top 1 winning
method, that means choosing ships like Des, Salem, Petro. If you
remember we have provided the Top features or Meta, so you know
what is efficent and what not.
So, beside seeing Top 1 meta usage, what else do you see, what
your intellect is capable to see? I can make a long listing of
what i see.
https://wows-numbers.com/player/season/529939994,KinimodKsuc,season,1024/
#Post#: 3198--------------------------------------------------
Re: Rankedz 24, 9/jul-2/sep, t7-8, t9-10
By: Hanuman Date: July 24, 2025, 11:20 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Here is a mainly BB user example from the S1R1 sertified
players.
Note that BBs are surely not a Top 1 Meta feature, so it is
suprising.
https://wows-numbers.com/player/season/581058941,ORCApower,season,1024/
#Post#: 3199--------------------------------------------------
Re: Rankedz 24, 9/jul-2/sep, t7-8, t9-10
By: wows Date: July 24, 2025, 11:34 am
---------------------------------------------------------
One of S1R1 player did mainly plane cruisers, those DD Tromp
like plane cruisers.
And many other info.
I would suggest you contenplate why your community doesn't know
any of that info, and does not talk about it either?
If i open any Youtube or forum you only talk about topics like:
Farewell, Ozi Osbourne, Loot boxes, Which steel ship for Ops,
Wedgie, Bots, Wr vs Pr, etc.
Don't you feel you are reatarded if your community all decades
long talks such primitive crap? Why not to talk about tactics,
Meta, look Top certificste owners, etc?
#Post#: 3201--------------------------------------------------
Re: Rankedz 24, 9/jul-2/sep, t7-8, t9-10
By: ency Date: July 24, 2025, 3:09 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
Maximum joy in S2 to see my favourite ships:
https://imgur.com/zMcoknS
#Post#: 3203--------------------------------------------------
Re: Rankedz 24, 9/jul-2/sep, t7-8, t9-10
By: ency Date: July 24, 2025, 5:50 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
a Competitive Mood appeared, so i progressed from R10 to R6
quickly:
https://imgur.com/lLGF3DJ
#Post#: 3204--------------------------------------------------
Re: Rankedz 24, 9/jul-2/sep, t7-8, t9-10
By: Hanuman Date: July 25, 2025, 3:51 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Yes, the competitive Mood definitely arrived, i would say at
7/10 level, if 3/10 is a typical Entertainment Mood.
So, from R10 to R6 went smoothly yesterday, and i guess in 2
days i can obtain another S2R1 certificate that all prove my
skills. But the ultimate S1R1 document is still in my plans
slightly, it should happen sooner or later, on next seasons.
For your community, i suggest to see that on recent 3 days the
TeamsWR was between 60-75%, and before that was 3 days at 35%.
All days over 10 battles, so you can't use your favourite Luck
argument. Explain by your community religion, why 3+3 days in a
row a totally different soup rate compared to the overall rate?
Why not 6 days at 40% constantly, but 75% and 30%, etc? And
which of those numbers represent Skills in your religion, the
overall average 50% or 3 days at 60-75%, or 3 days of 35%, which
number is more holy and truth and means skills and everything?
The average Soup rate is the holy truth, right? But then i
repeat the question, why 6 days in a row there were totally
opposite numbers than the holy average number? Any idea? No?
Maybe then consider your cult's religion is faulty?
Another enlightening question to your community: do you believe
you are better and skillful than me? By your religion you are
because you believe that SoupRate=40 means low skills, right?
Then how to explain that i outplay you and your idols 3 days in
a row, tons of times per year? Of course i outplayed in Gold
league either you or your idols from Top clans tons of times
during the 65-75% performance Mood. So, explain, how i have low
skills etc if i outplay you and your idols? You can't explain,
right? It is just illogical if you call someone as low skilled
when he knocks you and your idols on the floor tons of times.
*****************************************************
Previous Page
Next Page
You are viewing proxied material from gopher.createaforum.com. The copyright of proxied material belongs to its original authors. Any comments or complaints in relation to proxied material should be directed to the original authors of the content concerned. Please see the disclaimer for more details.