 |
Return Create A Forum - Home |
 |
--------------------------------------------------------- |
|
wows forum |
 |
https://wows.createaforum.com |
|
--------------------------------------------------------- |
|
***************************************************** |
|
Return to: Debates, Interviews |
|
***************************************************** |
|
#Post#: 2331-------------------------------------------------- |
|
debate: a bad deal: "1 DD for 1 CV" is |
|
By: ency Date: February 23, 2025, 5:13 am |
|
--------------------------------------------------------- |
|
I copy one debate from game chat here. |
|
In this MM were 4 DDS and 1 CV per team. |
|
I killed in a very early battle minutes enemy Cv Shinano with my |
|
DD Yamagiri and died instantly after doing that. |
|
Enemies played without a CV but still won the battle. |
|
After a battle the enemy CV came to debate and tried to prove |
|
that my tactics was bad as you see in the chat screenshot below. |
|
I debunked him by saying that tactics' goodness doesn't depend |
|
how any random battle goes with those tactics, it has nothing to |
|
do if we lost or won with that tactics, the tactics itself is |
|
independent of the result, so you can't say that a tactics is |
|
good or bad after a loss or a win. But he said the tactics is |
|
bad because we lost. The tactics is good, and msot times |
|
succeeds, no matter how that battle ended, the deal "1 DD for 1 |
|
OP CV" is always a good tactics, a good deal, no matter how any |
|
battle end. This debunks him. |
|
You can easily make a numbered list of good deals/trades. |
|
https://imgur.com/WL5r2fi |
|
https://imgur.com/yV5I0K5 |
|
https://imgur.com/wUsWk01 |
|
***************************************************** |
