Introduction
Introduction Statistics Contact Development Disclaimer Help
Return Create A Forum - Home
---------------------------------------------------------
True Left
https://trueleft.createaforum.com
---------------------------------------------------------
*****************************************************
Return to: True Left vs Right
*****************************************************
#Post#: 26122--------------------------------------------------
Re: Leftist vs rightist moral circles
By: antihellenistic Date: April 25, 2024, 9:24 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
They confess on how "whites" doing criminal activity
https://64.media.tumblr.com/2808bfea86031001e794777d74b97b44/f523a9d34073b883-4…
https://64.media.tumblr.com/c79506dc363b3a6034edbded8a6ecee2/d031cc175106ee14-9…
#Post#: 26123--------------------------------------------------
Re: Re: Leftist vs rightist moral circles
By: antihellenistic Date: April 25, 2024, 9:29 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
[img width=1280
height=580]
https://64.media.tumblr.com/947b54c26005b3ea6697d8974515188d/d309ddf87cc6156c-c…
#Post#: 27687--------------------------------------------------
Re: Trump Supporters and The Three Types of Readers by Adolf Hit
ler
By: antihellenistic Date: September 1, 2024, 4:45 am
---------------------------------------------------------
The enemy's forum felt disappointed with Hitler's emphasis on
national unification rather than the "Aryan unification", which
"Aryan" means the union of "White Nordic and Germanic" peoples
across Europe
[quote]There has been a tendency, even among some sincere
National Socialists, to adopt the attitude that Adolf Hitler,
while undoubtedly a very great man, was after all only a product
of his times, and that he thus shared many of the prejudices and
narrow outlooks of his contemporaries. It is felt that, while we
should acknowledge his greatness in certain areas, we must also
recognize his limitations in other areas and �improve� today�s
National Socialism by �correcting� those ideas which have
allegedly suffered from Adolf Hitler�s failure to comprehend, or
refusal to acknowledge, the deeper and broader significance of
certain aspects of the very philosophy which he originated.
The paramount consideration of National Socialism is that of
race. Underlying all its doctrines, whether economic, political,
or social, are racial considerations. The racial ideas of
National Socialism form the most fundamental ideological
framework upon which all the rest of the National Socialist
structure is built, and they completely determine the National
Socialist world view. As Colin Jordan, Deputy Commander of the
World Union of National Socialists, has said: National Socialism
results in thinking with the blood on all questions[1].
It is in this particularly critical area, namely, that of racial
doctrine, that Adolf Hitler is often alleged to have gone
astray. Specifically, he is accused of favoring a provincial
German nationalism, a narrow sort state-chauvinism, over the
broader Aryan racial nationalism which forms the basis of our
outlook today. As support for these allegations are cited a
number of his public statements, along with a supposed policy of
repression of the native populations of those areas occupied by
the German armies during World War II, such as France, Norway,
and Russia. These repressive measures supposedly stemmed from
Hitler�s contempt for all those who were not citizens of the
Third Reich.
...
Again, in the Twenty-Five Points, the party program of the
NSDAP, Points 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 23 demanded that restrictions
be placed on the privileges and activities of �foreigners� in
Germany � but here too the specific reference in Point 4 to Jews
makes it clear just who the foreigners were[10]. Indeed, there
was no concern about booting a horde of immigrant Belgians, for
example, out of the country, or about suppressing Irish
tendencies in German art, or about prying German newspapers out
of the hands of Scotsmen, or about putting an end to control of
the country�s finances by Finns, or about imprisoning Hungarians
for peddling pornography in Germany, or even about restricting
Danish speculation in German land. In every case the
undesirable, alien elements to which Hitler referred belonged to
the same nationality: they were all Jews, even when they may not
have been explicitly named as such. Most other nationalities
have a commendable tendency to mind their own business when
resident in someone else�s country.[/quote]
Source :
Adolf Hitler � German Nationalist or Aryan Racialist?
https://www.renegadetribune.com/adolf-hitler-german-nationalist-or-aryan-racial…
#Post#: 27688--------------------------------------------------
Re: Aryanism vs Boromir Syndrome
By: 90sRetroFan Date: September 1, 2024, 5:11 am
---------------------------------------------------------
It's not that Hitler did not care for building alliances beyond
Germany, but that Hitler explicitly preferred to ally with
non-Western countries, as we have shown in countless quotes in
the past:
�As allies, I prefer the Turks to the Bulgarians. � The
population of Sofia was enthusiastically welcoming a Russian
football team. The fact is that Bulgaria is strongly affected by
Panslavism, both on the political and on the sentimental level.
� On the political and sentimental level, there�s no obstacle to
an alliance between Turkey and the Reich. By reason of her
attachment to Islam, Turkey has a completely clear-cut religious
policy. The same is not true of Bulgaria, which, since it
practises the Greek Orthodox religion, finds in it new reasons
to feel friendly towards Russia.� � Adolf Hitler
�I feel much more sympathetically inclined to the lowliest Hindu
than to any of these arrogant islanders. Later on, the Germans
will be pleased that they did not make any contribution to the
survival of an out-dated state of affairs for which the world of
the future would have found it hard to forgive them.� - Adolf
Hitler
�I had already taken sides, and in our little discussions at
once sided with the Japanese. In a defeat of the Russians I saw
the defeat of Austrian Slavdom.� - Adolf Hitler
etc.
So we could easily argue that Hitler did care about Aryan
unification, but merely with a different definition of Aryan
than neo-Nazis'.
#Post#: 27825--------------------------------------------------
Re: Population and Demographics
By: rp Date: September 10, 2024, 4:53 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
Question: If we want a one child policy for "non Whites" in
general, shouldn't we want a 2 child policy for the Aryanists? I
want the Aryan birth rate to be higher than the non Aryan birth
rate (I have also looked into cloning, not just for this purpose
but to eliminate the possibility of non Aryan traits acquired
through genetic recombination).
#Post#: 27826--------------------------------------------------
Re: Re: Population and Demographics
By: 90sRetroFan Date: September 10, 2024, 7:24 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
"If we want a one child policy for "non Whites" in general"
To be clear, we do not want this in perpetuity. The moment
"white" (including Jewish) genocide is complete, we will start
slashing "non-white" births further.
"shouldn't we want a 2 child policy for the Aryanists?"
No. Aryanists should voluntarily refrain from reproducing in
order to prove we are not hypocrites, and also to preclude
inferior types joining us with the aim of getting to reproduce
more and hence corrupting our movement.
"I want the Aryan birth rate to be higher than the non Aryan
birth rate"
We can worry about that later. The urgent objective is to
genetically end machinism.
"I have also looked into cloning"
Please read the last sentence of the immediately preceding
paragraph again. Imagine if cloning falls into enemy hands: they
would gain unlimited ability for post-genocide resurrection!
Did you miss posts such as these?
https://trueleft.createaforum.com/true-left-vs-right/western-civilization-susta…
https://trueleft.createaforum.com/true-left-vs-right/western-civilization-susta…
https://trueleft.createaforum.com/true-left-vs-right/western-civilization-susta…
https://trueleft.createaforum.com/true-left-vs-right/western-civilization-susta…
https://trueleft.createaforum.com/true-left-vs-right/western-civilization-susta…
https://trueleft.createaforum.com/true-left-vs-right/western-civilization-susta…
/>(you posted this one!)
#Post#: 27827--------------------------------------------------
Re: Re: Population and Demographics
By: SirGalahad Date: September 10, 2024, 8:23 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
There�s nothing hypocritical about Aryans wanting to reproduce
for the sake of the mission, while simultaneously attempting to
put a stop to non-Aryan reproduction. If you were to
theoretically reproduce, I don�t think you should care a single
bit about what anti-Aryanists think about it. Also, I feel like
preventing all Aryanists from reproducing sets a bad precedent
on a genetic level, since I would assume that the people who
aren�t passionate enough to join our movement/party, aren�t high
quality enough to be reproducing in the first place. Not that
it�s impossible for someone of low genetic quality to join us,
since it�s possible for there to be a triumph of the will
despite their genetics, and it�s not like all of us here are
bastions of Aryan perfection, but you get what I mean
And if we follow the logic that people will just join us in
order to be able to reproduce, then they�ll just do the opposite
and AVOID joining, which would lead us back to the same problem
Either way, I feel like this rule would only set us back if we
all held true to it
#Post#: 27829--------------------------------------------------
Re: Re: Population and Demographics
By: 90sRetroFan Date: September 10, 2024, 9:32 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
"There�s nothing hypocritical about Aryans wanting to reproduce
for the sake of the mission, while simultaneously attempting to
put a stop to non-Aryan reproduction."
We would be accused of sneaky Yahwism, and the accusation would
soon become true, since those who are determined to reproduce
more than others (ie. the actual Yahwists) would be rushing to
join us if they perceive it as the way to get to reproduce more
than others.
"if we follow the logic that people will just join us in order
to be able to reproduce, then they�ll just do the opposite and
AVOID joining, which would lead us back to the same problem"
If inferior people join, our movement will become populated by
inferior people. If inferior people avoid joining, our movement
will remain populated by superior people. How is that the same
problem?
"I feel like this rule would only set us back if we all held
true to it"
If we don't, Aryanism will become what we set out to defeat.
#Post#: 28752--------------------------------------------------
Re: Aryanism vs Boromir Syndrome
By: rp Date: November 22, 2024, 10:54 am
---------------------------------------------------------
[quote author=90sRetroFan link=topic=348.msg7158#msg7158
date=1623743899]
This guy reminds me of a type that was common back in the
mid-2000s before the old post-9/11 anti-Zionist movement split.
This type does not consider "non-whites" to be the outgroup, but
does consider "non-whites" to be incapable of posing a serious
threat to Jews, and hence that success or failure in defeating
Jewish domination will be determined solely by (non-Jewish)
"whites". They could be described as non-tribalist bigots (or,
in other words, not racist, but Eurocentric). It's not that they
don't care about the welfare of "non-whites", but that they
believe that (non-Jewish) "white" rule is genuinely better for
"non-whites". (They even told JAM that his contribution to the
fight against Jewish domination was due only to his "white"
blood!)
As such, they refused to discuss non-Jewish white supremacism
alongside Jewish supremacism as two manifestations of the same
problem. JAM put pressure on these types to start doing so,
which led to a debate in which JAM's side (including myself)
took the position that what Jews are trying hardest to suppress
is anti-racism that counts Jews as racists, whereas our
opponents took the position that what Jews are trying hardest to
suppress is white supremacism that does not count Jews as
"whites". This is what induced the BS splinter (following which
every last one of the previous non-tribalist bigots gradually
embraced tribalism, exactly as I predicted they would, though
they blamed their ideological shift on "ingratitude" from
"non-whites").
This guy, however, gives me the impression that he has been
living under a rock for over a decade and hence missed the
above-described events and is behaving as though it is still the
mid-2000s!
Aesthetic sense reveals all:
https://twitter.com/DerorCurrency/status/1374873351403892737
According to him, I am a "master of inversion":
https://trueleft.createaforum.com/true-left-vs-right/western-civilization-is-ug…
Yet what kind of architecture do Jews themselves like?
http://aryanism.net/blog/aryan-sanctuary/kristallnacht-tribute/
[/quote]
The mentality is a product of Giant blood memory. It is similar
to "White" False Leftists who believe "Whites" must lead anti
Zionism/anti racism.
#Post#: 28762--------------------------------------------------
Re: Aryanism vs Boromir Syndrome
By: rp Date: November 23, 2024, 7:29 am
---------------------------------------------------------
What is annoying is that the above types tend to dominate the
U.S. based Twitter anti Zionist scene, with some Muslims sharing
their content uncritically...
This is why anti "Whiteness" is the way forward, not basic anti
Jewishness.
*****************************************************
Previous Page
Next Page
You are viewing proxied material from gopher.createaforum.com. The copyright of proxied material belongs to its original authors. Any comments or complaints in relation to proxied material should be directed to the original authors of the content concerned. Please see the disclaimer for more details.