Introduction
Introduction Statistics Contact Development Disclaimer Help
Return Create A Forum - Home
---------------------------------------------------------
True Left
https://trueleft.createaforum.com
---------------------------------------------------------
*****************************************************
Return to: True Left vs False Left
*****************************************************
#Post#: 5826--------------------------------------------------
Re: Firearms
By: rp Date: April 24, 2021, 1:44 am
---------------------------------------------------------
I changed it. Here is the new sentence:
"While I have heard some say that it is necessary for warriors
to adopt a non-vegan diet in order to foster the frame of mind
needed for combat, I do not agree with this. How can vegan
non-Westerners feel confident in being a vegan warrior when they
see even other non-Westerners trashing the diet? What is your
take on this?"
#Post#: 5830--------------------------------------------------
Re: Firearms
By: 90sRetroFan Date: April 24, 2021, 3:27 am
---------------------------------------------------------
"How can vegan non-Westerners feel confident in being a vegan
warrior when they see even other non-Westerners trashing the
diet? What is your take on this?"
Those who feel they must eat animal products in order to be
ready to fight are reflecting only who they are racially. Even
if it is true that those people are incapable of combat unless
they eat animal products, it does not imply that we would also
be incapable of combat unless we eat animal products. We and
they are different, hence with different dietary requirements
for optimizing performance, whether in combat or any other
field. If we should lack confidence in our diets because people
like them exist, then by the same logic they should also lack
confidence in their diets because people like us exist! But they
don't. So why should we?
(Of course, the ethical duty is on them to find a way to be
adequately combat-ready without animal products.)
#Post#: 5831--------------------------------------------------
Re: Firearms
By: rp Date: April 24, 2021, 3:40 am
---------------------------------------------------------
"If we should lack confidence in our diets because people like
them exist, then by the same logic they should also lack
confidence in their diets because people like us exist!"
I guess the point I am trying to get it at is that people lack
confidence in fighting because of our diets. For example, those
who consume animal products clearly have an advantage due to
their higher aggression. And history reflects this, as
non-Aryans almost always end up defeating Aryans. This is why I
believe in creating combat methods separate for Aryans.*
*Perhaps this could account for why in NS Germany the Aryan SS
was kept separate from the Wehrmacht, the latter of which mostly
had non-Aryans in its ranks?
#Post#: 5832--------------------------------------------------
Re: Firearms
By: 90sRetroFan Date: April 24, 2021, 4:15 am
---------------------------------------------------------
"those who consume animal products clearly have an advantage due
to their higher aggression."
Are you saying the animal products chemically causes aggression
in anyone who consumes them, or are you saying that those who
are inclined to consume animal products are more aggressive
anyway?
In any case, aggressiveness can be advantageous or
disadvantageous depending on circumstances.
"And history reflects this, as non-Aryans almost always end up
defeating Aryans."
I am not sure which examples you are thinking of. Aryan
diffusion involved us defeating Gentiles many times. The main
historical Turanian advantage over us is ergonomic: their food
being able to walk with them while we had to carry our food!
This allowed them to retreat back to the steppe whenever they
needed to, and if we tried to pursue them, we would always run
out of food first.
#Post#: 5833--------------------------------------------------
Re: Firearms
By: rp Date: April 24, 2021, 4:26 am
---------------------------------------------------------
"Are you saying the animal products chemically causes aggression
in anyone who consumes them, or are you saying that those who
are inclined to consume animal products are more aggressive
anyway?"
The former. But regarding the latter, I believe that Aryans who
would be so appalled at animal slaughter might think that
non-Aryans can defeat them because they possess more lightning
than Aryans, i.e. the non-Aryans can bring themselves to kill
humans because they have no compunction in killing innocent
animals, but Aryans cannot bring themselves to kill humans since
they do have such compunction.
"I am not sure which examples you are thinking of. Aryan
diffusion involved us defeating Gentiles many times. The main
historical Turanian advantage over us is ergonomic: their food
being able to walk with them while we had to carry our food!
This allowed them to retreat back to the steppe whenever they
needed to, and if we tried to pursue them, we would always run
out of food first."
Ok. I thought it was because of aggression, but now I see that
this is not the case.
#Post#: 5834--------------------------------------------------
Re: Firearms
By: 90sRetroFan Date: April 24, 2021, 6:05 am
---------------------------------------------------------
"I believe that Aryans who would be so appalled at animal
slaughter might think that non-Aryans can defeat them because
they possess more lightning than Aryans, i.e. the non-Aryans can
bring themselves to kill humans because they have no compunction
in killing innocent animals, but Aryans cannot bring themselves
to kill humans since they do have such compunction."
Precisely because I am so appalled at animal slaughter, I have
no problem bringing myself to kill humans who have no
compunction in killing innocent animals. Did Cain think Abel
could defeat him because Abel had no compunction sacrificing
lambs to Yahweh? Cain is our rolemodel.
#Post#: 6784--------------------------------------------------
Re: Firearms
By: 90sRetroFan Date: May 29, 2021, 10:12 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
https://www.yahoo.com/news/black-pro-gun-groups-across-175007520.html
[quote]Black gun owners plan to march in Oklahoma Saturday to
advocate for gun ownership and in honor of the Tulsa Race
Massacre.
As VICE News reported, hundreds of members from Huey P. Newton
Gun Club, Anubis Arms Gun Club, and the Panther Special
Operations Command as well other organizations from across the
country are expected to participate in the protest.
"Our hope is to try to galvanize a community, educate around the
position of Second Amendment rights, and hopefully be a vehicle
to more or less unify the African American community,"
co-founder of the Newton Gun Club in Dallas, Texas, Yafeuh
Balogun, said to VICE News.
...
The groups in attendance also aim to draw attention to the Tulsa
Race Massacre, a race riot that occurred 100 years ago this
year. Commemoration events are underway, and the US Department
of Homeland Security warned that white supremacist groups might
target the events. In addition, the groups also hope to inform
the Black community about how to act during a police
interaction, the report said.
Balogun told Vice that the groups credit themselves in part for
the spike in gun sales from Black people. As firearm sales
boomed in 2020, purchases from Black people also spiked amid the
COVID-19 pandemic and racial reckoning in the US.[/quote]
I would like to see a breakdown by type of firearm. We need long
guns above all, but I fear people are concentrating on handguns.
#Post#: 6796--------------------------------------------------
Re: Firearms
By: guest5 Date: May 29, 2021, 11:55 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
Sniper rifles preferably.
The Quietest Sniper Rifle Ever... and Why The Government Doesn�t
Regulate It...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VsSYngXbCc0
#Post#: 6797--------------------------------------------------
Re: Firearms
By: rp Date: May 29, 2021, 11:59 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
I've always seen sniper warfare as cowardly. But this merely
reveals the ignobility of those who invented it in the first
place. So it goes without saying that I will use any means
necessary to destroy them, including sniper warfare.
#Post#: 6799--------------------------------------------------
Re: Firearms
By: guest5 Date: May 30, 2021, 1:14 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Interestingly to myself at least, I've been contemplating this
very topic for a game I'm pondering making. I arrived at the
conclusion not too long ago that the ignoble races in the game's
story would use rifles and bullets and that the noble races used
thrown weapons and a shield of some kind as a counter, refusing
to resort to the enemies weaponry. Then you posted this the
other day:
https://trueleft.createaforum.com/mythical-world/aryan-weaponry/<br
/> That really blew my mind, lol! I had also thought the noble
races would be able to leap long distances because they would be
much lighter physically since they sustain themselves with
mushrooms only, and that the planet the story takes place on has
a weaker gravity than earth, allowing them to close the gap
between them and bullet-users faster. The ignoble races on the
other hand would use the weak gravity of the planet to build
ever bigger machines of war....
Back to reality:
[quote]The Whitworth rifle was arguably the first long-range
sniper rifle in the world.[1] Designed by Sir Joseph Whitworth,
a prominent British engineer, it used barrels with hexagonal
polygonal rifling, which meant that the projectile did not have
to bite into the rifling grooves as was done with conventional
rifling. His rifle was far more accurate than the Pattern 1853
Enfield, which had shown some weaknesses during the recent
Crimean War. At trials in 1857, which tested the accuracy and
range of both weapons, Whitworth's design outperformed the
Enfield at a rate of about three to one. Also, the Whitworth
rifle was able to hit the target at a range of 2,000 yards,
whereas the Enfield could only manage it at a distance of 1,400
yards.[2] During the American Civil War, the Confederate
sharpshooters equipped with Whitworth rifles were tasked to kill
Union field artillery crews, and were responsible for killing
Major General John Sedgwick � one of the highest-ranking
officers killed during the Civil War � at the Battle of
Spotsylvania Court House.[/quote]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sniper_rifle
Like 90sRF always says, nothing ignoble about using the weaponry
an enemy invented against that enemy.
*****************************************************
Previous Page
Next Page
You are viewing proxied material from gopher.createaforum.com. The copyright of proxied material belongs to its original authors. Any comments or complaints in relation to proxied material should be directed to the original authors of the content concerned. Please see the disclaimer for more details.