Introduction
Introduction Statistics Contact Development Disclaimer Help
Return Create A Forum - Home
---------------------------------------------------------
True Left
https://trueleft.createaforum.com
---------------------------------------------------------
*****************************************************
Return to: Human Evolution
*****************************************************
#Post#: 655--------------------------------------------------
Aryan immune system
By: 90sRetroFan Date: August 3, 2020, 11:54 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
OLD CONTENT
We are just better:
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neoteny_in_humans#Genetic_diversity,_relax
ed_sexual_selection_and_immunity
[quote]the transition to early agriculture when the non-neotenic
traits disappeared, which is theorized to be due to selection
for the immune system adapting to survive a higher pathogen load
caused by agriculture and men who retained more childlike traits
being less burdened by weakening of the immune system from upper
body musculature competing with the immune system over
nutrients. It is argued that the genetic evidence of only a
small part of the male population of the time of early
agriculture passing on their Y chromosomes can be explained by
the heredity of non-neotenic traits causing the male descendants
of the non-neotenic men who were not killed by diseases in one
generation to die from them in subsequent generations, leaving
no Y chromosome evidence of their short term continuation of
paternal bloodlines in present humans. Sexual selection for
stereotypic masculinity causing most men to fail to breed is
ruled out as it would have selected against neoteny, not for as
the archaeological evidence shows.[27][28][/quote]
#Post#: 4262--------------------------------------------------
Re: Aryan immune system
By: 90sRetroFan Date: February 16, 2021, 10:18 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
Again it all lines up as we predicted:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4398605/
[quote]Young men with superior upper-body strength typically
show a greater proclivity for physical aggression. The
traditional interpretation is that young men calibrate their
attitudes and behaviors to their physical formidability.
Physical strength is thus viewed as a causal antecedent of
aggressive behavior. The present study is the first to examine
this phenomenon within a developmental framework. We demonstrate
that males' antisocial tendencies temporally precede their
physical formidability.
...
This implies that physical aggression and male secondary sex
development have coevolved as part of an adaptive complex
(Archer, 2009). Our results cohere with sexual selection theory,
and suggest that aggressive-antisocial dispositions in childhood
may serve as preparation for future male-male competition in
young adulthood, when physical strength is at its peak.[/quote]
(The Western academic term "antisocial" is confusing by failing
to distinguish between proactive antisociality (which is caused
by aggressiveness) and reactive antisociality (which is caused
by awareness of current society being unfair). Better terms
would in fact be "anti-socialist" to describe the former (who
just don't care about society) and "socialist" to describe the
latter (whose idealism regarding society is the very reason why
we have trouble being enthusiastic about current society which
falls so far short of what is ideal).)
But the main conclusion is important. What the above calls the
"traditional interpretation" is basically that all men will be
as aggressive as they can get away with. The new study refutes
this: there exist ethically superior and inferior men, and the
ethically superior are indeed also the physiologically more
neotenous.
See also:
https://trueleft.createaforum.com/human-evolution/non-aryan-aggressiveness/
So how much longer are we going to put up with the
heavy-upper-body subhumans being allowed to keep reproducing?
#Post#: 5284--------------------------------------------------
Re: Aryan immune system
By: 90sRetroFan Date: April 4, 2021, 12:22 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Taylor Greene doesn't get it, unsurprisingly:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LwhM4ZtdIpY
(Ignore False Left TYT's RBG praise.)
Indeed, it is well documented that more men die of COVID than
women. While some people attribute it to men more often being
smokers etc., I wonder if heavier upper body musculature among
men compared to women on average could suffice to account for
the disparity?
#Post#: 11352--------------------------------------------------
Re: Aryan immune system
By: 90sRetroFan Date: February 17, 2022, 11:41 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
https://www.bbc.com/future/article/20150312-what-the-face-betrays-about-you
[quote]As you might expect, your health and medical history are
also written in your countenance � and the detail it offers is
surprising. The amount of fat on your face, for instance,
provides a stronger indication of your fitness than more
standard measures, such as your body mass index. Those with
thinner faces are less likely to suffer infections, and when
they do, the illness is less severe[/quote]
Related:
https://trueleft.createaforum.com/human-evolution/aryan-metabolism/msg7980/#msg…
https://trueleft.createaforum.com/human-evolution/aryan-metabolism/msg8071/#msg…
*****************************************************
You are viewing proxied material from gopher.createaforum.com. The copyright of proxied material belongs to its original authors. Any comments or complaints in relation to proxied material should be directed to the original authors of the content concerned. Please see the disclaimer for more details.