| Return Create A Forum - Home | |
| --------------------------------------------------------- | |
| Dragon Riders Planning Forums | |
| https://shanescavestory.createaforum.com | |
| --------------------------------------------------------- | |
| ***************************************************** | |
| Return to: Chess | |
| ***************************************************** | |
| #Post#: 12832-------------------------------------------------- | |
| Analysis Requests | |
| By: Dr. Egregious Date: November 16, 2013, 8:45 pm | |
| --------------------------------------------------------- | |
| As I mentioned before, I thought it might be fun and informative | |
| if I started this thread, and my workload has finally cleared up | |
| to allow it; if you've finished with a game and you'd like some | |
| advice and constructive criticism move by move, feel free to | |
| copy/paste your PGN here, and I'll try to have it done within | |
| twenty-four hours. If you just want feedback on a few | |
| particular moves, I can do that in short order. :) | |
| #Post#: 12919-------------------------------------------------- | |
| Re: Analysis Requests | |
| By: Taylor Date: November 18, 2013, 4:17 am | |
| --------------------------------------------------------- | |
| SHANE vs TAYLOR | |
| [tt]01. e4 g5 | |
| 02. Nh3 f6 | |
| 03. Bb5 Nh6 | |
| 04. d4 c6 | |
| 05. O-O g4 | |
| 06. Qxg4 f5 | |
| 07. Ng5 f4 | |
| 08. Qh5+ Nf7 | |
| 09. Nxf7 Qa5 | |
| 10. Nd6+ Kd8 | |
| 11. Qe8+ Kc7 | |
| 12. Qxc8+ Kxd6 | |
| 13. e5+ Kd5 | |
| 14. Nc3+ Ke6 | |
| 15. Bc4+ Kf5 | |
| 16. g4+ fxg3 e.p. | |
| 17. fxg3+ Kg6 | |
| 18. Bd3+ Kg7 | |
| 19. Rf4 kg8 | |
| 20. Qxf8++[/tt] | |
| I already know about the first part where I deliberately wanted | |
| Shane to win via a Fool's Mate on Black's side. | |
| At some point a game of "Tag" appeared to start; the King was | |
| running for his life most of the time :)) | |
| Was there anything I missed, after post 9459 when Shane wrote a | |
| wall of text | |
| http://shanescavestory.createaforum.com/chess-archives/preliminary-chess-round-… | |
| There was an error in your notation on turn 16. | |
| Pawns can't just magically jump to the same row as the opposing | |
| team's starting row. :P ~ KarjamP | |
| #Post#: 12962-------------------------------------------------- | |
| Re: Analysis Requests | |
| By: Shane Date: November 18, 2013, 9:42 am | |
| --------------------------------------------------------- | |
| This post | |
| http://shanescavestory.createaforum.com/chess-archives/preliminary-chess-round-… | |
| />and this post | |
| http://shanescavestory.createaforum.com/chess-archives/preliminary-chess-round-… | |
| />should probably help out. Taylor invoked En Passant | |
| http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/En_passant, | |
| so Taylor's f4 Pawn | |
| could capture a pawn on g4 and move to g3. | |
| ... Right? | |
| #Post#: 12971-------------------------------------------------- | |
| Re: Analysis Requests | |
| By: KarjamP Date: November 18, 2013, 10:04 am | |
| --------------------------------------------------------- | |
| I had figured out the problem and actually fixed it: The | |
| notation said that Taylor's pawn moved two steps forward to en | |
| passant instead of one step: an invalid move. | |
| #Post#: 12972-------------------------------------------------- | |
| Re: Analysis Requests | |
| By: Taylor Date: November 18, 2013, 10:05 am | |
| --------------------------------------------------------- | |
| Ergo, Shane slipped up, not me. :P | |
| The notation was a copy/paste from our match after he won. | |
| #Post#: 12982-------------------------------------------------- | |
| Re: Analysis Requests | |
| By: Dr. Egregious Date: November 18, 2013, 10:29 am | |
| --------------------------------------------------------- | |
| Apologies, Taylor; I suppose somehow I never noticed that you | |
| and Shane had called for an opinion in that game. XD Didn't | |
| mean to ignore you. | |
| Anyway. I'd say 10. ... Qa5 was the best option you had, | |
| because it didn't result in instant death and it saved your | |
| queen. Shane missed one thing in his analysis, though; had you | |
| played 9. ... Bh6, the best counter would've been 10. Nxh6+ Kf8 | |
| (forced) 11. Qf7#. | |
| 10-11: There's not much to say; you only had one possible move | |
| each time. | |
| 13: 13. ... Ke6 might've been better, because there are still | |
| plenty of threatening pieces left on the board and d5 isn't | |
| really a safe place for a king until you're mostly down to pawns | |
| and a rook or two. | |
| 16. Props for remembering en passant in the heat of the moment, | |
| but I would've just played 16. Kxg5 instead. That way your pawn | |
| wouldn't be left open to recapture by two of Shane's pawns. | |
| 19. Rather than 19. ... Kg8, you needed to leave g8 open so that | |
| your rook could protect your bishop and prevent Qxf8#. You | |
| needed to get your queen into play to stand a chance, really, | |
| and the quickest way I'm seeing is e6, Qb4, Qe7. | |
| You didn't miss much, after Move 10; there's only so much you | |
| can do when your opponent can keep putting you in check and | |
| you've only got one or two ways to escape. | |
| #Post#: 12994-------------------------------------------------- | |
| Re: Analysis Requests | |
| By: Taylor Date: November 18, 2013, 12:09 pm | |
| --------------------------------------------------------- | |
| [quote author=Dr. Egregious link=topic=733.msg12982#msg12982 | |
| date=1384792174] | |
| Apologies, Taylor; I suppose somehow I never noticed that you | |
| and Shane had called for an opinion in that game. XD Didn't | |
| mean to ignore you.[/quote] | |
| No worries. :) | |
| [quote author=Dr. Egregious link=topic=733.msg12982#msg12982 | |
| date=1384792174] | |
| Anyway. I'd say 10. ... Qa5 was the best option you had, | |
| because it didn't result in instant death and it saved your | |
| queen. Shane missed one thing in his analysis, though; had you | |
| played 9. ... Bh6, the best counter would've been 10. Nxh6+ Kf8 | |
| (forced) 11. Qf7#.[/quote] | |
| Not to mention he missed Qa5 as well :)) | |
| Guess that's what happens if you don't have a physical | |
| chessboard and have to resort to a mind-one. | |
| [quote author=Dr. Egregious link=topic=733.msg12982#msg12982 | |
| date=1384792174] | |
| 10-11: There's not much to say; you only had one possible move | |
| each time. | |
| 13: 13. ... Ke6 might've been better, because there are still | |
| plenty of threatening pieces left on the board and d5 isn't | |
| really a safe place for a king until you're mostly down to pawns | |
| and a rook or two.[/quote] | |
| I see... | |
| [quote author=Dr. Egregious link=topic=733.msg12982#msg12982 | |
| date=1384792174] | |
| 16. Props for remembering en passant in the heat of the moment, | |
| but I would've just played 16. Kxg5 instead. That way your pawn | |
| wouldn't be left open to recapture by two of Shane's | |
| pawns.[/quote] | |
| I hadn't seen Shane's rook on g1; I thought he'd move his Bishop | |
| to d3. | |
| I kinda like en passant, and I especially like matches with | |
| eight of them. :3 | |
| [quote author=Dr. Egregious link=topic=733.msg12982#msg12982 | |
| date=1384792174] | |
| 19. Rather than 19. ... Kg8, you needed to leave g8 open so that | |
| your rook could protect your bishop and prevent Qxf8#. You | |
| needed to get your queen into play to stand a chance, really, | |
| and the quickest way I'm seeing is e6, Qb4, Qe7. | |
| You didn't miss much, after Move 10; there's only so much you | |
| can do when your opponent can keep putting you in check and | |
| you've only got one or two ways to escape. | |
| [/quote] | |
| I see... | |
| Thank you very much, Dr. Egregious! :) | |
| #Post#: 13012-------------------------------------------------- | |
| Re: Analysis Requests | |
| By: Shane Date: November 19, 2013, 12:26 am | |
| --------------------------------------------------------- | |
| Wait, eight en passants? :o | |
| EDIT: | |
| Thread stickied; I believe such a thread is important. :) | |
| #Post#: 13101-------------------------------------------------- | |
| Re: Analysis Requests | |
| By: Dr. Egregious Date: November 19, 2013, 2:11 pm | |
| --------------------------------------------------------- | |
| You're most welcome. :) | |
| Eight en passant captures? I've never seen more than one per | |
| game in practice; eight in one game is possible, but you'd | |
| basically have to be working together with your opponent to make | |
| it happen. Eight is also the absolute maximum that can happen, | |
| since any en passant capture will either remove one of your | |
| pawns or move one of your pawns to the sixth rank, where it can | |
| no longer capture en passant. | |
| #Post#: 13115-------------------------------------------------- | |
| Re: Analysis Requests | |
| By: Charlotte Date: November 20, 2013, 4:41 am | |
| --------------------------------------------------------- | |
| That was against me; someone at these forums were wondering how | |
| many en passants were possible in one game. | |
| I think it was Shane, I'm not sure, though. :) | |
| ***************************************************** |