Introduction
Introduction Statistics Contact Development Disclaimer Help
Return Create A Forum - Home
---------------------------------------------------------
RateTheRef
https://ratetheref.createaforum.com
---------------------------------------------------------
*****************************************************
Return to: Euros 2024
*****************************************************
#Post#: 80671--------------------------------------------------
Sch�rer: Georgia v Portugal
By: BabyRef Date: June 26, 2024, 2:46 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
Brilliant decision to YC for simulation just now - one of the
decisions of the tournament
#Post#: 80672--------------------------------------------------
Re: Sch�rer: Georgia v Portugal
By: BabyRef Date: June 26, 2024, 3:16 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
Some brave decisions, including YC to Ronaldo for dissent.
Missed a key incident though with the Georgia penalty that was
overturned by VAR.
#Post#: 80674--------------------------------------------------
Re: Sch�rer: Georgia v Portugal
By: TheThingFromLewes Date: June 26, 2024, 3:21 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
[quote author=BabyRef link=topic=6093.msg80672#msg80672
date=1719432990]
Some brave decisions, including YC to Ronaldo for dissent.
Missed a key incident though with the Georgia penalty that was
overturned by VAR.
[/quote]
I really dislike the award of the penalty. Absolutely minute
contact and the player falls like he�d been poleaxed.
Howard Webb and his �contact with consequence� view needs to be
adopted worldwide by IFAB.
#Post#: 80675--------------------------------------------------
Re: Sch�rer: Georgia v Portugal
By: RCG Date: June 26, 2024, 3:21 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
From the referees angle it looked like an exaggerated fall
(which I think it was)
Was there contact? Yes
Was it forceful? No
Did it cause him to cartwheel? Unlikely
We in "supportable" territory yet?
To me, I think whatever was given on field, should have stood
(Enjoying the way Georgia play however and seeing CR7s toys
flying)
#Post#: 80676--------------------------------------------------
Re: Sch�rer: Georgia v Portugal
By: DublinRef Date: June 26, 2024, 3:24 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
[quote author=TheThingFromLewes
link=topic=6093.msg80674#msg80674 date=1719433263]
[quote author=BabyRef link=topic=6093.msg80672#msg80672
date=1719432990]
Some brave decisions, including YC to Ronaldo for dissent.
Missed a key incident though with the Georgia penalty that was
overturned by VAR.
[/quote]
I really dislike the award of the penalty. Absolutely minute
contact and the player falls like he�d been poleaxed.
Howard Webb and his �contact with consequence� view needs to be
adopted worldwide by IFAB.
[/quote]
If so - Hopefully they'll apply it better than the PGMOL do!
#Post#: 80678--------------------------------------------------
Re: Sch�rer: Georgia v Portugal
By: DublinRef Date: June 26, 2024, 3:38 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
[quote author=DublinRef link=topic=6093.msg80676#msg80676
date=1719433450]
[quote author=TheThingFromLewes
link=topic=6093.msg80674#msg80674 date=1719433263]
[quote author=BabyRef link=topic=6093.msg80672#msg80672
date=1719432990]
Some brave decisions, including YC to Ronaldo for dissent.
Missed a key incident though with the Georgia penalty that was
overturned by VAR.
[/quote]
I really dislike the award of the penalty. Absolutely minute
contact and the player falls like he�d been poleaxed.
Howard Webb and his �contact with consequence� view needs to be
adopted worldwide by IFAB.
[/quote]
If so - Hopefully they'll apply it better than the PGMOL do!
[/quote]
Also just to clarify TTFL - I in no way meant that as a snide
remark to the very valid point you were making! I fully agree
with you.
#Post#: 80692--------------------------------------------------
Re: Sch�rer: Georgia v Portugal
By: Arbitre anglais Date: June 26, 2024, 5:43 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
Thought he was much better in this second game. Much more
relaxed but sharp and on the ball. Kept game going and coped
well with Portugal�s shameless antics which are never easy for
the referee. Repeatedly exaggerating contact and gesturing etc
but wasn�t swayed. Superb YC for diving. Still didn�t think it
was a penalty, even on replay - full on exaggerated fall because
of the swing. Can be justified as a penalty, but would even have
been happy to see ref stick with his immediate judgement to wave
it away.
Georgia have been great to watch though so was happy to see them
win and go through!
#Post#: 80696--------------------------------------------------
Re: Sch�rer: Georgia v Portugal
By: ajb95 Date: June 27, 2024, 4:09 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Minimal contact so poor OFR from VAR
#Post#: 80700--------------------------------------------------
Re: Sch�rer: Georgia v Portugal
By: Arbitre anglais Date: June 27, 2024, 7:50 am
---------------------------------------------------------
[quote author=ajb95 link=topic=6093.msg80696#msg80696
date=1719479378]
Minimal contact so poor OFR from VAR
[/quote]
Spot on and this is the downside of VAR - it�s become
established (directed by UEFA/FIFA??) that you effectively have
to change the decision, if you�re called over. Also everyone
knows, by definition, another senior referee thinks you�ve made
a �clear and obvious error�. Dressing it up as not re-refereeing
the game by making the ref trot over doesn�t cut it, if the ref
is effectively pressured into changing. I wouldn�t have liked
being called over for that - may be the angles, but couldn�t
really see the contact even in the replays.
*****************************************************
You are viewing proxied material from gopher.createaforum.com. The copyright of proxied material belongs to its original authors. Any comments or complaints in relation to proxied material should be directed to the original authors of the content concerned. Please see the disclaimer for more details.