| Return Create A Forum - Home | |
| --------------------------------------------------------- | |
| MS Speaks | |
| https://msspeaks.createaforum.com | |
| --------------------------------------------------------- | |
| ***************************************************** | |
| Return to: LEMTRADA (Campath, alemtuzumab) | |
| ***************************************************** | |
| #Post#: 1349-------------------------------------------------- | |
| (Abst.) Alemtuzumab beats Rebif for RRMS in MRI endpoints | |
| By: agate Date: September 4, 2016, 7:35 pm | |
| --------------------------------------------------------- | |
| From PubMed, September 4, 2016: | |
| [quote]Neurology. 2016 Sep 2. | |
| Superior MRI outcomes with alemtuzumab compared with | |
| subcutaneous interferon β-1a in MS | |
| Arnold DL, Fisher E, Brinar VV, Cohen JA, Coles AJ, Giovannoni | |
| G, Hartung HP, Havrdova E, Selmaj KW, Stojanovic M, Weiner HL, | |
| Lake SL, Margolin DH, Thomas DR, Panzara MA, Compston DA; | |
| CARE-MS I and CARE-MS II Investigators. | |
| Collaborators (230) | |
| OBJECTIVE: | |
| To describe detailed MRI results from 2 head-to-head phase III | |
| trials, Comparison of Alemtuzumab and Rebif Efficacy in Multiple | |
| Sclerosis Study I (CARE-MS I; NCT00530348) and Study II (CARE-MS | |
| II; NCT00548405), of alemtuzumab vs subcutaneous interferon | |
| β-1a (SC IFN-β-1a) in patients with active | |
| relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS). | |
| METHODS: | |
| The impact of alemtuzumab 12 mg vs SC IFN-β-1a 44 μg | |
| on MRI measures was evaluated in patients with RRMS who were | |
| treatment-naive (CARE-MS I) or who had an inadequate response, | |
| defined as at least one relapse, to prior therapy (CARE-MS II). | |
| RESULTS: | |
| Both treatments prevented T2-hyperintense lesion volume | |
| increases from baseline. Alemtuzumab was more effective than SC | |
| IFN-β-1a on most lesion-based endpoints in both studies (p | |
| < 0.05), including decreased risk of new/enlarging T2 lesions | |
| over 2 years and gadolinium-enhancing lesions at year 2. Reduced | |
| risk of new T1 lesions (p < 0.0001) and gadolinium-enhancing | |
| lesion conversion to T1-hypointense black holes (p = 0.0078) | |
| were observed with alemtuzumab vs SC IFN-β-1a in CARE-MS | |
| II. Alemtuzumab slowed brain volume loss over 2 years in CARE-MS | |
| I (p < 0.0001) and II (p = 0.012) vs SC IFN-β-1a. | |
| CONCLUSIONS: | |
| Alemtuzumab demonstrated greater efficacy than SC IFN-β-1a | |
| on MRI endpoints in active RRMS. The superiority of alemtuzumab | |
| was more prominent during the second year of both studies. These | |
| findings complement the superior clinical efficacy of | |
| alemtuzumab over SC IFN-β-1a in RRMS. | |
| CLINICALTRIALSGOV IDENTIFIER: | |
| NCT00530348 and NCT00548405. | |
| CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: | |
| The results reported here provide Class I evidence that, for | |
| patients with active RRMS, alemtuzumab is superior to SC | |
| IFN-β-1a on multiple MRI endpoints.[/quote] | |
| The abstract can be seen here | |
| http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27590291. | |
| ***************************************************** |