| Return Create A Forum - Home | |
| --------------------------------------------------------- | |
| Lynx Wind Forum | |
| https://lynxwindforumhtml.createaforum.com | |
| --------------------------------------------------------- | |
| ***************************************************** | |
| Return to: Hydro Power | |
| ***************************************************** | |
| #Post#: 5949-------------------------------------------------- | |
| Hydrocat turbine | |
| By: rrattink Date: May 10, 2015, 2:58 pm | |
| --------------------------------------------------------- | |
| I'm looking for a system to produce 12v power for river | |
| prospecting and I found the hydrocat online. It's two hulls with | |
| a waterwheel between them running a generator. The concept is | |
| very simple and I have many possible ideas to improve it for my | |
| needs but my challenge is the alternator. The water is at | |
| relatively constant speed 24hrs a day with moderate flow changes | |
| for seasonal influences such as rainfall or snowmelt as compared | |
| to wind speed or solar. I have a spool of 24 gauge wire and | |
| would most likely have a pma at both ends of the cross axle to | |
| double the output. My question is what kind of pma would suit | |
| this application given my wire size and slower waterwheel rpms? | |
| Any input would be appreciated. I have n52 neos as well.. | |
| #Post#: 5957-------------------------------------------------- | |
| Re: Hydrocat turbine | |
| By: lynx wind Date: May 11, 2015, 10:07 am | |
| --------------------------------------------------------- | |
| Power is roughly speaking rpm x torque. With water you may have | |
| a lot of torque and low rpm. The PMA just needs to be purpose | |
| built. It may also be possible to gear up to get higher rpm | |
| which is a benefit. I'l help you design if you can collect | |
| some rough data on rpm and torque expected. | |
| #Post#: 5959-------------------------------------------------- | |
| Re: Hydrocat turbine | |
| By: rrattink Date: May 11, 2015, 7:48 pm | |
| --------------------------------------------------------- | |
| Thx. I guess the place to start is by measuring the efficiency | |
| of the "paddle wheel" in relation to the water flow and come up | |
| with an rpm. Time to build. Any ideas on the most efficient | |
| wheel diameter to length would be? Since water is much denser | |
| than air the length would give me torque as more "blade surface" | |
| is being pushed. Conversely a smaller diameter would spin faster | |
| and improve rpm. Does this make sense to you? Got any forum | |
| members up to date on hydrodynamics? 😀 | |
| #Post#: 5960-------------------------------------------------- | |
| Re: Hydrocat turbine | |
| By: lynx wind Date: May 12, 2015, 7:02 am | |
| --------------------------------------------------------- | |
| Water is analogous to electricity. Smaller pipe higher pressure | |
| (volts). Higher volume higher flow (amps) | |
| If you can drop the water from a height you will get more power. | |
| This is why hydro electric plants draw water from near the top | |
| and place the turbines below. | |
| If you make a big diameter wheel you will get low rpm high | |
| torque. Small diameter = high rpm low torque. Either way the | |
| power is the same. Torque x rpm | |
| Try making a system where the water has to flow through the | |
| turbine and not around. | |
| #Post#: 5961-------------------------------------------------- | |
| Re: Hydrocat turbine | |
| By: rrattink Date: May 12, 2015, 9:39 am | |
| --------------------------------------------------------- | |
| Thx. I get what your saying with the dam analogy but this puppy | |
| will be portable and floats on the surface of the creek or | |
| river. I'll draw something up of wat I'm looking at so you can | |
| get an idea. This is the initial source of my idea | |
| https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=H3_jPbQ2iuc | |
| #Post#: 5962-------------------------------------------------- | |
| Re: Hydrocat turbine | |
| By: lynx wind Date: May 12, 2015, 11:44 am | |
| --------------------------------------------------------- | |
| Considering the Hydro Cat design is so easy it justifies the | |
| lower efficiency. Not everyone is going to build an elevated | |
| water fall leading to a hydro plant. I have a PMA that I run | |
| with a steam engine. It puts out 200 watts and only turns at | |
| about 200 rpm. | |
| ***************************************************** |