Introduction
Introduction Statistics Contact Development Disclaimer Help
Return Create A Forum - Home
---------------------------------------------------------
Lynx Wind Forum
https://lynxwindforumhtml.createaforum.com
---------------------------------------------------------
*****************************************************
Return to: Anything off topic
*****************************************************
#Post#: 2728--------------------------------------------------
Re: Material's
By: happygolucky Date: May 14, 2014, 10:33 am
---------------------------------------------------------
@cg it is a base mount support system.. will not interfere
with stator or rotor..... collars underneath vawt on shaft,
etc, they are used as separators...it helps do the work my
friend with wind, i'm going to try an replicate what my dad did,
that i remember..what i helped him build...... complex to
describe.. you still have slight very very... slight amount of
friction, his did too..but spun for hours..freely ,just by hand,
physics was the problem it will stop eventually....with out
energy,motor, wind etc.. you need to eliminate contact friction
points to nothing.. but even with slight friction efficiency is
high.
will work to aerate your pond ...large high torque vawt on
magnets an shaft with bellows
happy
#Post#: 2733--------------------------------------------------
Re: Material's
By: happygolucky Date: May 14, 2014, 5:37 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
i did not say anything about lynx did i? or his design? i know
what it dose! ...on the contrary i have not criticized it either
i'm building one too...i do not have cad software i could but
i'am retired just tinker played with auto cad once......if i did
i would draw you a set of prints in 3D... but pictures are worth
a thousand words...an research/experience... believe me it
works... i did this years ago with my dad..who is now deceased
..but his ideas live on threw me.. amen.
this is as simple as it gets an then you can imagine from
there..i like tops too !
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FM0c0GL9ha0
#Post#: 2736--------------------------------------------------
Re: Material's
By: happygolucky Date: May 14, 2014, 6:56 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
look close i think you will see what i mean..
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sRbsJ51G8oQ&list=PL27386C6D2E2BFB47
#Post#: 2737--------------------------------------------------
Re: Material's
By: nessprojects Date: May 14, 2014, 8:58 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
@HGL
Levitation by magnets are a great way to get frictionless motion
but what you are not understanding is how are you going to
maintain a 1/8" gap or less between stator and magnets ?. If the
gap is allowed to move larger then the magnetic flux in the
coils will decrease thus allowing your turbine to race away (No
control over it).
Good idea but very difficult to implement into this turbine
design.
In the last video he has some form of bearing at the top too +
that thing did not seem to spin very free in my opinion. Lynx
bearing works very well and its the only bearing in the turbine.
My opinion is that it is too much trouble for very little gain,
if any.
If you really wish to try that route then good luck with your
venture.
#Post#: 2739--------------------------------------------------
Re: Material's
By: happygolucky Date: May 14, 2014, 11:25 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
if i understand the 175 system is being built on the same
principle as the 75 was then,yes i would understand the
(difficulty)
as the rotor is spinning on a single axis ball bearing.. still
using resin filler?
my dads design had a fix center bearing recessed from bottom
in top plate, an bottom plate was fixed locked an he pulled the
top an bottom together adjusting distance between magnets
/bearing space ... with a bolt an threaded rod..locked? distance
can be adjusted an still levitate an spin free if that makes
since? as i have seen other designs adjustment in this manor.
the 75 is entirely different i understand it has one ball
bearing friction point..locked on top an adjusted from the
bottom sound kinda the same ? minus single ball raising an
lower stator an magnet plate.. i assumed different.. my bad...
...if that makes since..i would like to play around with this
idea top would only spin bottom is still fixed if that makes
since too.
#Post#: 2743--------------------------------------------------
Re: Material's
By: happygolucky Date: May 15, 2014, 8:47 am
---------------------------------------------------------
thanks CG , wind is a mystery,your first an last statement are
exactly right on.. i believe you can control the space between
rotor an stator. i understand the internet is full of HOJO ,
will stop frustrating the board , control magnets levitation
distribution forces are achievable.. there are many conference
going on with this tech,levitation bearings always fascinated, i
play with it,experimented outside the realm/box, i said i'm
building 175 to plan... thinking to with great men of science,
experience an knowledge..making a second experimental rotor
turbine to drive a generator head.. i will drop the subject of
magnetic bearings matter period. bring it to the table.. as
idea off topic when finished. i understand you,i was 10 yrs old
have, no blueprint just a memory from 50 years ago... long
time to recall...i was taught to think challenge , question. the
frontier of science/technology. time an place for everything.
HGL
#Post#: 2745--------------------------------------------------
Re: Material's
By: happygolucky Date: May 15, 2014, 9:57 am
---------------------------------------------------------
@ CG you have great ideas too. i see way beyond the forest
sometimes. no pun intended can not explain myself with words
sometimes . .when kids where playing outside, i was tearing
things apart to see what made them work.., an reading popular
mechanics..instead of comic books an encyclopedias still want my
flying car.... my MS windows paint is not fully functional? ..i
have a home premium 7 authentic edition.i have tried to use
paint , but like everything else they want money for new upgrade
to windows 8.... very limited use of that program paint.. i can
free style draw an that is not working proper..
#Post#: 2746--------------------------------------------------
Re: Material's
By: happygolucky Date: May 15, 2014, 10:16 am
---------------------------------------------------------
i do not have a correct version of the alternative mechanism
deign for 175 or i do an just have not got all the facts, but
have an idea of what has happened..nor how to wind new coils? or
make stator ..like in 75 kit with melamine board..maybe way
ahead here need to slow down till air foil study is done... or
it is still the same design as the seagull 75 alternator
assembly slight modified along the way.. i hear conflicting
statements on board , dropping a single ball bearing in the
tube as @ sut did an letting 5" bolt head cut off ride on it, in
brass 4"nipple still with bottom cap for adjustment height.. one
i have shows 75 stator minus ball bearing.. just add oil to cut
off bolt head? i understand both principles.. there was a change
somewhere or left out..? i have seen a single sharp point
something i have on harden steel to steel surface..on vent
turbine or a ball an steel surface fill me in please!
#Post#: 2750--------------------------------------------------
Re: Material's
By: happygolucky Date: May 15, 2014, 7:43 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
thanks@cg for the cad links that's swell.. ... there is a big
difference in price.. no doubt...little different but design you
have the idea tho..just more compact savonius vawt .. magnet
strength will vary.. i like lynx design very much..simple
pleasing to the eye, but why do you use resin pot for screws
mounting holes for stator? i have seen similar alternator as a
pencil point both case harden steel surfaces like spinning
top.. no bearing just brass grease pot bushing top, oil port
bottom...@cg this is the current alternator design for 175?...
thanks again for the cad software.. just glanced @ it looks
like trial software..will see if i can play around an learn this
new draft site i like 3D a lot different than what i did 30
years ago..i have cad program up an running swimming threw it .
tried auto cad blank page nothing.. this looks like trial
software what do you use?
hgl
#Post#: 2752--------------------------------------------------
Re: Material's
By: happygolucky Date: May 15, 2014, 8:51 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
@ cg i used autocad 2.0 in collage then moved up 1984/1989 ...
ran the McDonnell Douglas Automation Companys (McAuto) founded
which was. ... The first Computer-Aided Design programs used
simple algorithms 2d/3d/cad/cam an some stuff with sun micro..
long time ago..
*****************************************************
Previous Page
Next Page
You are viewing proxied material from gopher.createaforum.com. The copyright of proxied material belongs to its original authors. Any comments or complaints in relation to proxied material should be directed to the original authors of the content concerned. Please see the disclaimer for more details.