| Return Create A Forum - Home | |
| --------------------------------------------------------- | |
| Lynx Wind Forum | |
| https://lynxwindforumhtml.createaforum.com | |
| --------------------------------------------------------- | |
| ***************************************************** | |
| Return to: Electronics related to alternative Energy | |
| ***************************************************** | |
| #Post#: 1900-------------------------------------------------- | |
| The reason lighter gauge works better for LJL | |
| By: lynx wind Date: March 26, 2014, 3:02 pm | |
| --------------------------------------------------------- | |
| Ahha! I figured out why the heavier gauge wire doesn't work as | |
| well for the LJL. It is very difficult without simultaneously | |
| winding primary and secondary to get the coils to intermingle | |
| enough. If one heavy gauge primary is just laid on top a | |
| secondary it is as if the turns ratio is closer to 1:1 rather | |
| than 6.8:1 | |
| I guess any gauge wire will work if the two coils can | |
| intermingle enough. | |
| I got my 20 awg coil working fine once I seated them tighter | |
| together. | |
| A ferrite placed around the two coils helps too, but its best to | |
| get the aircore coil working first. | |
| #Post#: 1902-------------------------------------------------- | |
| Re: The reason lighter gauge works better for LJL | |
| By: sut Date: March 26, 2014, 6:25 pm | |
| --------------------------------------------------------- | |
| I was going to try that but I just have not had the time! or | |
| knowledge!! to tell the difference on whether it was better or | |
| not besides mine is all mucked up now laying in pieces on bench | |
| #Post#: 1928-------------------------------------------------- | |
| Re: The reason lighter gauge works better for LJL | |
| By: lynx wind Date: March 27, 2014, 9:11 pm | |
| --------------------------------------------------------- | |
| So what I am finding is that a smaller gauge secondary is a | |
| benefit because it can be fluxed better by the primary being in | |
| closer proximity. The first LJL-sc I made I sent to Laser | |
| Saber. His comment was it worked better than the typical | |
| aircore and many of the ferrite core. I assumed it was | |
| something about the 4" diameter and tight coil. It was a 30 awg | |
| and 26 awg coil. Now I think it performed well because it is | |
| very nearly saturated much like a ferrite core. | |
| I will experiment with some various sizes of 30 awg and 24 awg | |
| coils. We have to make sure the primary can handle up to 4 | |
| amps. | |
| I would recommend if you guys make these you wind them tightly | |
| and bind them into as thin a coil as possible. It may be | |
| possible to lose the ferrite and get back to a simple coil and | |
| transistor. | |
| We should also experiment with the diameter and number of turns. | |
| #Post#: 1934-------------------------------------------------- | |
| Re: The reason lighter gauge works better for LJL | |
| By: happygolucky Date: March 28, 2014, 12:39 am | |
| --------------------------------------------------------- | |
| ;D i like this idea tight | |
| ***************************************************** |