| Return Create A Forum - Home | |
| --------------------------------------------------------- | |
| Jason Moyle Racing | |
| https://jasonmoyleracing.createaforum.com | |
| --------------------------------------------------------- | |
| ***************************************************** | |
| Return to: ROLLING ROAD & ENGINE DYNO RESULTS | |
| ***************************************************** | |
| #Post#: 27-------------------------------------------------- | |
| Fast road MK1 rolling road results. | |
| By: JMR Date: June 26, 2012, 6:47 pm | |
| --------------------------------------------------------- | |
| To start the ball rolling, this should be of interest to those | |
| who want the perk up their daily driver... | |
| We had a fast road conversion to do recently in a Mk1 Cabrio. | |
| The the guy wanted something he can go out on a sunny Sunday in | |
| with the roof down and enjoy a bit of extra power when desired | |
| but without the need to hit the redline everywhere. | |
| I figured a conservative approach was needed so ported the head | |
| in a different way to how I normally do them. I kept the valve | |
| sizes at the std GTi 40/33, enlarged the throat area slightly | |
| less than I would when looking for the best flow from the | |
| standard size valves and left both the inlet & exhaust ports | |
| totally stock/un-ported...no smoothing...nothing...just as they | |
| come from the factory. The inlet manifold is also standard, as | |
| is the throttle body. | |
| Despite keeping the ports std, the increased throat bowl size & | |
| valve re-shaping gave just over a 20% flow increase on the inlet | |
| side from standard..I also made an interesting discovery with | |
| the std hydraulic head flow...more on that in an article at a | |
| later date. | |
| I had the head skimmed to suit the cam I wanted to use, so | |
| brought the chamber size down from the std 30cc to 27cc to give | |
| a 10.5:1 C.R. | |
| Being a later Cabrio it's a hydraulic DX with K-jet, so I fitted | |
| a Newman Phase 2 fast road cam with 268 degree's duration & .420 | |
| thou lift & a vernier pulley. | |
| Newman had a bit of bad press a couple of years ago with issues | |
| of incorrect keyway locations on GTi championship supplied cams | |
| etc, which was actually an error on the part of an outside | |
| contractor, but as it say's Newman on the box... | |
| Anyway, based on the quality & condition of a race cam I removed | |
| from an old hillclimb engine, and the quality of the cams I've | |
| since bought & the service received, we have become a Newman | |
| dealer. | |
| The owner fitted the head & cam to the standard 1800 bottom end | |
| & timed it up as I recommended as a starting point...or at least | |
| I hope he did!,,,along with a modded airbox, Jetex system, and a | |
| tubular manifold. The manifold is a short primary...long | |
| secondary type...virtually a copy of the std cast manifold & | |
| downpipe...so I doubt there's much gain there. | |
| And now excuse time!... | |
| I did'nt get chance to make it to the dyno myself on the warm | |
| Saturday morning (remember those!) when the Cabrio turned the | |
| rollers, but with a conservative ignition timing of 27 degree's | |
| running on 95 unleaded, a slightly leaner than ideal mixture | |
| right through the rev range of 0.93 and no time to swing the cam | |
| timing, the above spec made the power curve below... | |
| [IMG] | |
| http://i66.photobucket.com/albums/h278/mrhillclimber/2012-05-17133910.jpg[/img] | |
| Peak power, as can be seen, hit 108hp at the wheels @ 5,500rpm, | |
| and is hanging on very well at 6K still with 106...camshafts of | |
| circa 270 degree's normally fall away fast after mid 5's so I | |
| suspect the cam timing is'nt ideal for peak power in terms of | |
| numbers, but when the whole curve was plotted up, both my dyno | |
| man Alvin & the customer elected to leave well alone! | |
| For comparison, on these rollers a std 1800 8v GTi makes 86hp at | |
| the wheels & around 112-114ib/ft of torque when worked back, and | |
| an 1800 KR 16v shows 110-112 at the wheels. With around 130ib/ft | |
| now available from 2,500 to 5,500, and a peak of around | |
| 133-134ib/ft @ 5000, it goes up the road well enough...the smile | |
| on the owners face after returning from a road test was enough | |
| to convince my dyno man apparently! | |
| As a package, it's mostly hit the target I wanted to | |
| achieve...good road manners, no loss of low end power over | |
| standard...in fact a bit of a gain, and decent urge up through | |
| the rev range when needed. I think peak power numbers can be | |
| raised with some cam timing adjustments as both the peak torque | |
| & power points are a little high, and the leaner than ideal fuel | |
| mixture could unlock another couple of hp going from previous | |
| experience...though the owner reported back just over a week | |
| after the rollers session to say how pleased he was overall, and | |
| fuel consumption...or rather the lack of it... is better than | |
| before...with twins about to enter the household the poor chap | |
| needs all the help he can get! | |
| #Post#: 72-------------------------------------------------- | |
| Re: Fast road MK1 rolling road results. | |
| By: Stooza Date: July 9, 2012, 3:00 pm | |
| --------------------------------------------------------- | |
| This offers great encouragement for my car ;D | |
| #Post#: 82-------------------------------------------------- | |
| Re: Fast road MK1 rolling road results. | |
| By: JMR Date: July 10, 2012, 3:12 pm | |
| --------------------------------------------------------- | |
| ;) | |
| #Post#: 2239-------------------------------------------------- | |
| Re: Fast road MK1 rolling road results. | |
| By: Gusaphinya Date: December 7, 2017, 2:58 am | |
| --------------------------------------------------------- | |
| It is very good that I read this good. I like this content very | |
| much. | |
| ***************************************************** |