| Return Create A Forum - Home | |
| --------------------------------------------------------- | |
| IL2 Air Combat! | |
| https://il2freemodding.createaforum.com | |
| --------------------------------------------------------- | |
| ***************************************************** | |
| Return to: Plane of the Week Articles | |
| ***************************************************** | |
| #Post#: 11470-------------------------------------------------- | |
| Plane of the Week: Lavochkin-Gorbunov-Gudkov LaGG-3 | |
| By: vonofterdingen Date: June 1, 2020, 2:13 pm | |
| --------------------------------------------------------- | |
| https://i.postimg.cc/BvSNHbcm/Screen-Hunter-278.png | |
| I was a bit surprised to see that the | |
| Lavochkin-Gorbunov-Gudkov LaGG-3 has not made it into the plane | |
| of the week thread yet. Though not a spectacular performer, by | |
| any means, it played a vital role in slowing German progress in | |
| the early stages of the Great Patriotic War. It was not popular | |
| with its pilots, who repurposed the letters to mean something | |
| like Casket Varnished and ready for use. To me it was somewhat | |
| analogous to the US use of the P-39 in the Pacific Theater; | |
| intensely disliked but necessary to use. Perhaps the LaGG-3�s | |
| best contribution to the war effort was the collection of | |
| lessons learned that led to the development of later Lavochkin | |
| models such as the La-5. | |
| From Wikipedia: | |
| The Lavochkin-Gorbunov-Gudkov LaGG-3 was a refinement of the | |
| earlier LaGG-1 and was one of the most modern aircraft available | |
| to the Soviet Air Force at the time of Germany's invasion in | |
| 1941. Despite its wooden construction, it was overweight and | |
| underpowered, at one stage 12 LaGG-3s were being completed daily | |
| and 6,528 had been built when factory 31 in Tbilisi switched to | |
| Yak-3 production in 1944. | |
| On 29 June 1940 the LaGG-3 was accepted for production and | |
| the first plant to build LaGG-3's was Plant No.23 in Leningrad | |
| and was tested in December 1940. As soon they were built, the | |
| first aircraft were sent to their units in Soviet Asia.[4] The | |
| LaGG-3 proved immensely unpopular with pilots. It was somewhat | |
| hard to control as it reacted sluggishly to stick forces. In | |
| particular, it was difficult to pull out of a dive, and if the | |
| stick was pulled too hard it tended to fall into a spin. As a | |
| consequence, sharp turns were difficult to perform. Moreover, | |
| pilots reported several imperfections: badly made hydraulic | |
| systems, broken connecting rods, oil leaks, engine overheating, | |
| rapid engine wear and loss of power. Other faults included, | |
| defective landing gear, tail wheel failure, poor quality cockpit | |
| glass, poorly finished cowling panels, and poor quality delta | |
| wood panels due to rushed production, as a result of the German | |
| invasion. The quality of aircraft varied widely from factory to | |
| factory. | |
| As reports of these problems came back to Lavochkin's | |
| Experimental Design Bureau (OKB), in February 1941, no less than | |
| 2,228 modifications were ordered to be introduced into the | |
| series. Actually, despite the military's doubts, the Soviet | |
| government ordered 66 series of the Lavochkin fighter, which | |
| underwent a host of successive improvements in engines, | |
| propeller, and armament.[4] The airframe was lightened as well. | |
| The LaGG team re-examined the design and pared down the | |
| structure as much as possible. Moreover, automatic slats were | |
| added to the wings to improve climb and maneuverability on the | |
| 35th Series and further weight was saved by installing lighter | |
| armament (the first four series were equipped with one axial | |
| Berezin machine gun firing through a hollow propeller shaft, two | |
| more synchronized cowl mounted Berezin machine guns with 200 | |
| rounds per gun and two synchronized 7.62 mm (0.3 in) ShKAS | |
| machine guns above and to the rear of the cowling with 325 | |
| rounds per gun; from 8th Series the axial Berezin was replaced | |
| by a 20 mm (0.79 in) ShVAK, coupled with a port Berezin in the | |
| cowling.[4] But the improvement was slight and, thus, without an | |
| alternative powerplant, when the LaGG-3 was first committed to | |
| combat in July 1941, it was effective against bombers but it was | |
| completely outclassed by the Messerschmitt Bf 109 F. | |
| https://i.postimg.cc/W16XdgrD/Screen-Hunter-279.png | |
| In combat, the main advantage of the LaGG-3 was the strength | |
| of its airframe and the fact that it did not easily catch fire, | |
| despite the extensive use of wood. However, the laminated wooden | |
| panels did tend to shatter when hit by high explosive rounds and | |
| Soviet pilots nicknamed the plane Lakirovanny Garantirovanny | |
| Grob, or "guaranteed varnished coffin". | |
| Later in 1941, the LaGG-3 appeared with an internally | |
| balanced rudder, retractable ski landing gear for the winter, | |
| retractable tailwheel and plumbed for drop tanks. The result was | |
| still not good enough. Even with the lighter airframe and | |
| revised supercharged engine, the LaGG-3 was underpowered. | |
| However, despite its limitations, some Soviet pilots managed to | |
| reach the status of ace flying the LaGG-3. G. I. Grigor'yev, | |
| from 178th IAP, was credited of at least 11 air victories plus | |
| two shared. But pictures of his LaGG-3 "Yellow 6", in | |
| November�December 1941, show 15 "stars", so his score was | |
| probably higher. Experiments with fitting a Shvetsov M-82 radial | |
| engine to the LaGG-3 airframe finally solved the power problem | |
| and led to the Lavochkin La-5 and La-7. | |
| [img width=1024 | |
| height=671] | |
| https://i.postimg.cc/YSdR37dM/Screen-Hunter-280.png[/img] | |
| In game� | |
| This is one of my favorite planes to fly. And right now I am | |
| sitting here trying to think of why that is. I believe that I | |
| just like early war scenarios, and when flying early war on the | |
| eastern front this plane is my best bet. I prefer the Yak-1, but | |
| the LaGG-3 is a better plane for me than the I-16 or MiG-3. | |
| Maybe I am just a sucker for the underdog. I don�t feel a lot of | |
| confidence going against a Bf-109 but then I do not feel | |
| overwhelmed either. | |
| #Post#: 11472-------------------------------------------------- | |
| Re: Plane of the Week: Lavochkin-Gorbunov-Gudkov LaGG-3 | |
| By: larsresult Date: June 2, 2020, 7:17 am | |
| --------------------------------------------------------- | |
| It is not often I fly the Russian fighters but I prefer the | |
| whole Yak series as more survivable than early LaGGs and I16s. | |
| The later La5FN/7 were very good though. Despite its poor | |
| reputation the LaGG3 was able to take a lot of damage and could | |
| deal with most bombers easily. | |
| #Post#: 11473-------------------------------------------------- | |
| Re: Plane of the Week: Lavochkin-Gorbunov-Gudkov LaGG-3 | |
| By: Beowolff Date: June 2, 2020, 8:31 am | |
| --------------------------------------------------------- | |
| I've flown this bird a lot...but it's been a GREAT while since | |
| I've thought to fly it again. (Been years now.) | |
| I actually love this bird and do fairly well with her in combat. | |
| This is a super good write up for this plane. | |
| Thank you, Von! ;D | |
| S! | |
| Beo | |
| #Post#: 11474-------------------------------------------------- | |
| Re: Plane of the Week: Lavochkin-Gorbunov-Gudkov LaGG-3 | |
| By: JG51_Ruski Date: June 2, 2020, 11:29 am | |
| --------------------------------------------------------- | |
| good post Von I've learned far more from your post than any | |
| other forum I've been in | |
| #Post#: 11475-------------------------------------------------- | |
| Re: Plane of the Week: Lavochkin-Gorbunov-Gudkov LaGG-3 | |
| By: DHumphrey Date: June 2, 2020, 12:06 pm | |
| --------------------------------------------------------- | |
| Another hit Von, great POW !!! | |
| I too flew this plane quite a bit during the early years of the | |
| game, but like Beo, I've not flown her in a long time. Might | |
| have to do a couple of Quick Missions and see if I can still get | |
| a 109 or two. :) | |
| #Post#: 11478-------------------------------------------------- | |
| Re: Plane of the Week: Lavochkin-Gorbunov-Gudkov LaGG-3 | |
| By: vonofterdingen Date: June 2, 2020, 12:29 pm | |
| --------------------------------------------------------- | |
| The nose cannon is a saving grace, but don't try to dive to get | |
| out of trouble like you might in a P-40. Pieces and parts start | |
| to fall off. | |
| #Post#: 11485-------------------------------------------------- | |
| Re: Plane of the Week: Lavochkin-Gorbunov-Gudkov LaGG-3 | |
| By: cafs Date: June 2, 2020, 5:59 pm | |
| --------------------------------------------------------- | |
| [quote author=vonofterdingen link=topic=1658.msg11478#msg11478 | |
| date=1591118982] | |
| The nose cannon is a saving grace, but don't try to dive to get | |
| out of trouble like you might in a P-40. Pieces and parts start | |
| to fall off. | |
| [/quote] | |
| Another great PoW, Von! | |
| That's true, Von, it will fall apart in a fast dive. Always keep | |
| this bird in the horizontal fight envelope. | |
| ***************************************************** |