| Return Create A Forum - Home | |
| --------------------------------------------------------- | |
| Darvince Eeting Cheese | |
| https://darvince.createaforum.com | |
| --------------------------------------------------------- | |
| ***************************************************** | |
| Return to: The Playground / Programs | |
| ***************************************************** | |
| #Post#: 2898-------------------------------------------------- | |
| sdafdfas | |
| By: Darvince Date: July 17, 2013, 3:54 pm | |
| --------------------------------------------------------- | |
| i didn't want to lose this wonderful piece of literature | |
| [glow=black,2,300][s]Ok, at first I thought this question was | |
| "Why do you think what you did was wrong?" but then I realized | |
| you made it phrased differently so I couldn't snack about how | |
| there actually is no right or wrong in a sandbox game. I would | |
| just flat out say that I think what I did was wrong according to | |
| Minecraft, but it isn't, so I'm not going to say that. What I | |
| did is wrong to you, who want to play on a server where | |
| everything is built "legitimately". However, this calls into | |
| question what legitimacy really is in survival Minecraft. To | |
| most people, it involves not using cheats such as xray and | |
| auto-digging bots or other things, but to you it involves more, | |
| such as ignoring anything that can be done within the game but | |
| can give you a unique advantage that others cannot get, such as | |
| duplicating items before a region is reset, seeing diamonds in | |
| an unloaded chunk due to lag, or eliminating fog in Optifine. | |
| Although, in itself, resetting regions is even more unlegit than | |
| the aforementioned things due to you having to exit the game and | |
| use another program to do it. However, since this was righting a | |
| wrong (shmoopy's griefing) you may feel it was okay, but I feel | |
| it was as unlegit as the duplication of items, since Shmoopy put | |
| you under a legit (no hacking or tricks or anything else) | |
| disadvantage, you got yourself out of that with an unlegit | |
| advantage. If this had happened to somewhere else, like Kaeshar, | |
| would you have reverted it as well?[/s] | |
| :-[ I feel if I went with the above I would get | |
| permabanned[/glow] | |
| #Post#: 2905-------------------------------------------------- | |
| Re: sdafdfas | |
| By: Tuto99 Date: July 17, 2013, 4:08 pm | |
| --------------------------------------------------------- | |
| Bravo, bravo. | |
| #Post#: 2910-------------------------------------------------- | |
| Re: sdafdfas | |
| By: atomic7732 Date: July 17, 2013, 6:13 pm | |
| --------------------------------------------------------- | |
| the problem is it's not a pvp server and you're not supposed to | |
| directly disadvantage people, because that is seen as "wrong", | |
| most likely even to the people that do it | |
| you know (i would hope) that bla doesn't like when people | |
| duplicate items with the glitches that sometimes happen (like | |
| the piston one) so why would taking something from a chunk that | |
| will be reset be any more legit than the resetting itself, | |
| considering what you removed will not be reset. how is | |
| duplication in anyway more legit than just fixing something a | |
| griefer (done obviously on purpose for the intent of grief) to | |
| an original condition without putting in all the work over | |
| again? it's not legit in a glitch, it shouldn't be legit when a | |
| chunk is being fixed either. | |
| #Post#: 2911-------------------------------------------------- | |
| Re: sdafdfas | |
| By: Mudkip Date: July 17, 2013, 6:35 pm | |
| --------------------------------------------------------- | |
| . | |
| #Post#: 3252-------------------------------------------------- | |
| Re: sdafdfas | |
| By: Bla Date: September 19, 2013, 2:36 pm | |
| --------------------------------------------------------- | |
| I will not ban you. But I think it is a bit disappointing to see | |
| that you instead write | |
| [quote]Honestly, I know that what I did was wrong according to | |
| what you think, but it isn't officially in Blacraft rules. I | |
| also feel that you should have been more questioning when I | |
| asked for a permaban. I feel that duplicating items is giving | |
| myself an unlegit advantage compared to other players, which is | |
| Illegal on Blacraft.[/quote] | |
| And than you then go elsewhere to argue the exact opposite, that | |
| your advantage wasn't unlegit. | |
| However, my question was, as you state, worded differently, and | |
| was simply | |
| [quote]What do you think about what you did?[/quote] | |
| All I intended was to see what you think about your own actions, | |
| to get an idea of how you would behave in the future. I still | |
| don't think because of this that you will break the rules in the | |
| future. But I object to calling it a wonderful piece of | |
| literature when it is really simply rewording my question to a | |
| strawman discussion of what is legit and unlegit, two vague and | |
| hard to define concepts that I still think you can get a strong | |
| sense of by using your intuition, when there was at least one | |
| actual, much simpler rule that was broken - destroying | |
| infrastructure built by others. | |
| #Post#: 3265-------------------------------------------------- | |
| Re: sdafdfas | |
| By: Tuto99 Date: September 19, 2013, 9:54 pm | |
| --------------------------------------------------------- | |
| Wait... THIS is still going on? | |
| #Post#: 3272-------------------------------------------------- | |
| Re: sdafdfas | |
| By: atomic7732 Date: September 19, 2013, 10:20 pm | |
| --------------------------------------------------------- | |
| no | |
| #Post#: 3274-------------------------------------------------- | |
| Re: sdafdfas | |
| By: Darvince Date: September 19, 2013, 10:45 pm | |
| --------------------------------------------------------- | |
| Well no, I won't be banned now, but then, I assumed you to be in | |
| a more angry mood and I thought that I would remain permabanned | |
| for saying something like that. | |
| ***************************************************** |