Introduction
Introduction Statistics Contact Development Disclaimer Help
Return Create A Forum - Home
---------------------------------------------------------
CHAILATTE
https://chailatte.createaforum.com
---------------------------------------------------------
*****************************************************
Return to: Yesteryear
*****************************************************
#Post#: 822--------------------------------------------------
SKJ old articles: Madhuri Dixit
By: QUANT Date: April 23, 2022, 3:24 am
---------------------------------------------------------
https://www.pinkvilla.com/entertainment/discussion/real-side-madhuri-dixitan-ar…
#Post#: 828--------------------------------------------------
Re: SKJ old articles: Madhuri Dixit
By: Dancing fox Date: April 23, 2022, 6:32 am
---------------------------------------------------------
I agree. Her interview with Karan, in one of the episodes of
KWK, indicated the same. She was everything but genuine. She
appeared with Juhi. Juhi looked genuine in comparison. I am her
fan but she lacks genuineness.
#Post#: 829--------------------------------------------------
Re: SKJ old articles: Madhuri Dixit
By: QUANT Date: April 23, 2022, 6:46 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Oh yes!! She was so full of herself in it! She was so unlikeable
and a complete contrast to Juhi.
#Post#: 835--------------------------------------------------
Re: SKJ old articles: Madhuri Dixit
By: Lotus Petals Date: April 23, 2022, 12:34 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
Juhi is one of the humblest actress ever..
our 80s actresses are also all down to earth
As for Madhuri, I never liked her offscreen persona. But
onscreen, she rocks
*****************************************************
You are viewing proxied material from gopher.createaforum.com. The copyright of proxied material belongs to its original authors. Any comments or complaints in relation to proxied material should be directed to the original authors of the content concerned. Please see the disclaimer for more details.