Introduction
Introduction Statistics Contact Development Disclaimer Help
Return Create A Forum - Home
---------------------------------------------------------
Blueberry Prison Roleplay
https://blueberryprisonrp.createaforum.com
---------------------------------------------------------
*****************************************************
Return to: Resolved/Closed
*****************************************************
#Post#: 11359--------------------------------------------------
Sophia Watson.
By: Alexis Vasquez Date: September 6, 2016, 6:38 am
---------------------------------------------------------
In-Game name:Tyrone_Jefferson
Date of the incident:Today.
The Players you are reporting: Sophia Watson.
Rule that have been broken: OOC insults, voiding RP,
powergaming, trolling.
Story:Basically, I RP my jaw broken, I go for a checkup, then,
/do Two guards come and frisk you, like..-wtf, I told her I
won't RP with NPCs as that's just unrealistic, she voids the RP,
calls us utter idiots and shuts the door in my face, walking
off, she is also known for her trolling past, tasing people,
spraying them and more, she has a past with such, actions should
be taken.
Two witness are Quinton and Nathan.
There is no rule that states that we can't attack or rush a
Medic with no 3 guards online, period.
Evidence:
http://imgur.com/a/dmwg5
#Post#: 11360--------------------------------------------------
Re: Sophia Watson.
By: Alexis Vasquez Date: September 6, 2016, 6:46 am
---------------------------------------------------------
And again, she tazes someone through a 75KG metal door and
abuses script to get him on the ground.
Taser transmits electricity, she just transmitted electricity
into ALOT of conductor,s 75KG of metal, she'd fry herself and
kill Nathan as it x75 the power of the hit, 75k volts.
Then she decides to get NPCs again and threatens to avoid the
roleplay if we don't roleplay with her NPCs.
http://imgur.com/a/p4T3C
#Post#: 11361--------------------------------------------------
Re: Sophia Watson.
By: Bella Date: September 6, 2016, 6:47 am
---------------------------------------------------------
I agree, I was in the scene and I witness this. She just keeps
avoiding RP with some drima dona imagination, she's just RP'ing
to win and RP'ing NPC's that don't exist instead of facing
consequences ICly and roleplaying properly. Afterall, why not
just go to clucking bell, lol?
#Post#: 11362--------------------------------------------------
Re: Sophia Watson.
By: Strawberry Date: September 6, 2016, 6:48 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Alright after seeing your report I see that you mentioned OOC
insults, voiding RP, powergaming, trolling. In how any possible
way I can be Powergaming, Explanation one for PG 1. As far as I
saw the situation I was out numberd and there were no DoC guards
online, so I went off the roleplay NPCs' but he disargreed so I
said you want to void this roleplay than? He said I will report
you onto the forums, alright (thats for '' voiding Roleplay'').
Second explanation for Trolling. 2. In how any possible way did
I troll, I did not use any OOC for the majority of the time, you
started complaining into /do for the most part of the time and
maked it look like OOC. Half of the other people into this
situation agreed to roleplay NPCs'. I would like you to answer
this.
#Post#: 11363--------------------------------------------------
Re: Sophia Watson.
By: Alexis Vasquez Date: September 6, 2016, 6:52 am
---------------------------------------------------------
You didn't ask me if I wanted to voided, you voided it yourself
and called us idiots, shut the door in our face and walked off.
I can NPC 50 more black guys and break the door, no?
I didn't want to attack you, even if I did, I have the right to,
there is no rule that claims we can't attack a medic if no
guards are online.
Nearly no one agreed to NPC, except you and Liam, when even Liam
was just a bystander.
Me and two friends did not agree to, yet you insist, if we
denied, you call us idiots and void it on your own.
I just had enough of you, not the first time.
There are like two more witness.
#Post#: 11364--------------------------------------------------
Re: Sophia Watson.
By: Bella Date: September 6, 2016, 6:52 am
---------------------------------------------------------
You're the only one that agreed, we didn't agree. It's your
problem if you were I out numberd and there were no DoC guards
online, we are actual players, just face the reality, there were
no guards on. If there were guards and we were two or three,
then we'd just roleplay NPC prisoners, just like that?
#Post#: 11365--------------------------------------------------
Re: Sophia Watson.
By: Strawberry Date: September 6, 2016, 6:56 am
---------------------------------------------------------
So I want to point out here and maybe get into a conclusin IF
YOU ONLY WANT. We can re-roleplay to situation from which part
you like either you agree to NPCs' that will be concluded and
seen. If you would like to re-roleplay the situation from the
start I would be glad to do it, if you do not want to we can let
an admin handle this application.
#Post#: 11366--------------------------------------------------
Re: Sophia Watson.
By: Alexis Vasquez Date: September 6, 2016, 6:57 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Oh, so now you agree? What about the insults?
#Post#: 11367--------------------------------------------------
Re: Sophia Watson.
By: Strawberry Date: September 6, 2016, 6:59 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Those insults were from your reflection and actions you did
there.
But if you feel really insulted, I apologies for my actions.
#Post#: 11368--------------------------------------------------
Re: Sophia Watson.
By: Alexis Vasquez Date: September 6, 2016, 7:02 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Yeah well, my friends are offended too, they don't want to RP
anymore, good job.
*****************************************************
Next Page
You are viewing proxied material from gopher.createaforum.com. The copyright of proxied material belongs to its original authors. Any comments or complaints in relation to proxied material should be directed to the original authors of the content concerned. Please see the disclaimer for more details.