* * * * *

      I'm adjusting my tin hat to talk a bit about Google banning people

Another day, another YouTube channel gets demonitized. While it matters to
the channel owner that the channel was demonitized, for this post, it doesn't
matter which channel, because it probably happens many times per month. Maybe
per day, given the sheer size of YouTube these days. And in every case you do
hear about, the owner is going around in circles, with different parts of
Google trying to pass the support issue to another part of Google hoping the
person with the support issue goes away.

It's not that Google can't fix the issue, it's just that it's not something
that is easily done, or cheap. And it's not something any one employee can
fix, due to how the whole software gestalt that runs on the computers and
handles everything at Google works. And this I don't think is often talked
about, or even known. Heck, it's an educated guess on my part, but with
Google big on automation (because as they have stated often times, “humans
don't scale”) they just can't (or won't) manually deal with the 500 hours of
video uploaded every minute at Google (as of June 2022, which seems to be
most quoted value I found with minimal searching).

I suspect that Google engineers have written a massive machine learning
system with so many variables that it's impossible to figure out why any one
person has been demonitized, banned, or removed from the Google system. And I
don't think it's ever just one thing that caused the Google AI (Artificial
Insanity) to “pull the trigger” so-to-speak, just many little things that
happen to converge on a particularly day to cause the Google AI to go “Thou
shalt be penalized!”

I think that explains why Google employees are cagey about the cause of a
ban. They explain the lack of explanation with keeping reasons from Really
Bad Actors™ who would learn to walk the line but not cross it. It's an excuse
a convenient one, a plausible one, but one that hides, in my opinion, the
truth—the Google employees don't know the reason! It's an opaque wall of AI
software. It's like asking you “where is your name stored in your memory?”

And it also explains why it takes a massive PR (Public Relations) campaign on
the part of the punished party to force Google employees to rectify the
situation—that means running the taining set, again, with yet another
exception to the banning rules. That takes time, and energy, and is probably
something Google's upper management don't like doing that often.

Also, not to sound like a Google apologist, but I do wonder how many Bad
People™ Google actually ban versus the false positives you hear about in the
news. Given the scale, it's could be a rather large number of Bad People™ are
removed from Google all the time. But it doesn't seem easy to come across
such figures. Hmmmmm …


Email author at [email protected]