* * * * *

                          We are all publishers now

> [This gopher site] has had, from very early days, a policy which allows
> [users] to request that their account be removed and all their content
> immediately and permanently deleted. This is called "claiming your civil
> right", … The Orientation Guide explains:
>
> > This promise is not a gimmick … It is a recognition that the ability to
> > delete your accounts from online services is an important part of self
> > ownership of your digital identity. This is genuinely an important
> > freedom and one which many modern online services do not offer, or
> > deliberately make very difficult to access.
> >
>
> I have always been, and still am, proud that [this gopher server] offers
> this right so explicitly and unconditionally, and I have no plans to change
> it. I really think this an important thing.
>
> And yet, it always breaks my heart a little when somebody actually claims
> their right, and it's especially tough when a large amount of high- quality
> gopherspace content disappears with them. As several people phlogged about
> noticing, kvothe recently chose to leave gopherspace, taking with him his
> wonderful, long-running and Bongusta-aggregated phlog "The Dialtone" … I
> loved having kvothe as part of our community, but of course fully respect
> his right to move on.
>
> As I deleted his home directory, I thought to myself "Man, I wish there was
> an archive.org equivalent for Gopherspace, so that this great phlog wasn't
> lost forever". A minute later I thought "Wait… that is totally inconsistent
> with the entire civil right philosophy!". Ever since, I've been trying to
> reconcile these conflicting feelings and figure out what I actually
> believe.
>

“The individual archivist, and ghosts of Gophers past [1]”

> Some of the commentary on solderpunk's piece has shown, of course, divided
> opinion. There are those who claim that all statements made in public are,
> res ipsa loquitor, statements which become the property of the public. This
> claim is as nonsensical as it is legally ridiculous.
>
> By making a statement in a public place, I do not pass ownership of the
> content I have "performed" to anyone else, I retain that ownership, it is
> mine, noone elses. I may have chosen to permit a certain group of people to
> read it, or hear it; I may have restricted that audience in a number of
> ways, be it my followers on social media, or the small but highly-regarded
> phlog audience; I may have structured my comments to that audience, such as
> using jargon on a mailing list which, when quoted out of context, can
> appear to mean something quite different; I may just have posted a stupid
> or ill-judged photo to my friends.
>
> In each of those cases, it is specious to claim that I have given ownership
> of my posts to the public, forever, without hope of retrieval. It is not
> the case that I have surrendered my right to privacy, forever, to all 7.7bn
> inhabitants of this earth.
>
> …
>
> In much the same way, I reacted strongly when I realised that posts I had
> made on my phlog were appearing on google thanks to that site's indexing of
> gopher portals. I did not ever consent to content I made available over
> port 70 becoming the property of rapacious capitalists.
>

“Ephemera, or the Consciousness of Forgetting [2]”

Back during college I wrote a humor column [3] for the university newspaper
(The Atlantic Sun at Florida Atlantic University) [4]. In one of my early
columns (and not one I have on my site here) I wrote a column with
disparaging remarks about a few English teachers from high school. Even
worse, I named names!

I never expected said English teachers to ever hear about the column, but of
course they did. My old high school was only 10 miles away (as the crow
flies) and there were plenty of students at FAU (Florida Atlantic University)
[5] who had attended the same high school I did. Of course I should have
expected that. But alas, I was a stupid 18 year old who didn't know better.

Now I know better.

It was a painful experience to learn, but things spoken (or written) can move
in mysterious ways and reach an audience that it was not intended for.

The copies of the humor column I have on my site are only a portion of the
columns I wrote, the ones I consider “decent or better.” The rest range from
“meh” to “God I wish I could burn them into non-existance.” But alas, they
exist, and I've even given a link to the paper archives where they can be
unceremoniously resurrected and thrown back into my face. Any attempt to
“burn them into non-existance” on my part would be at best a misdemearnor and
worst a felony.

In this same vein, Austin McConnell [6] erased his book from the Internet
[7]. He managed to take the book out of print and buy up all existing copies
from Amazon (THIS IS A SPONSORED LINK TO AMAZON! AMAZON NOW REQUIRES THIS
DISCLOSURE. I REPEAT, THIS IS A SPONSORED LINK TO AMAZON! Although, given
that the book is no longer available, can this really be considered a
sponsored link?) [8]. There are still copies of his book out there in the
hands of customers, and there's nothing he can do about that. The point
being, once something is “out there” it's out, and the creator has limited
control over what happens.

I'm not trying to victim shame Daniel Goldsmith. What I am trying to say is
that Daniel may have an optimistic view of consumption of content.

As to his assertion that his content via gopher is now “the property of
rapacious capitalists”—plainly false. Both Ireland (where Daniel resides) and
the United States (where Google primarily resides) are both signatories to
the “Berne Convention for the Protection of Literary and Artistic Works [9]”
which protects the rights of authors and Daniel owns the copyright to his
works, not Google. Daniel may have not wanted Google to index his gopher site
but Google did nothing wrong in accessing the site, and Google has certainly
never claimed ownership of such data (and if it did, then Daniel should be
part of a very long line of litigants). Are there things he can do? Yes, he
could have a /robots.txt file that Google honors (The Internet Archive [10]
also honors it, but at best it's advisory and not at all mandatory—other
crawlers might not honor it) or he can block IP (Internet Protocol)
addresses. But sadly, it was inevitable once a web-to-gopher proxy was
available.

The issue at heart is that everyone is a publisher these days, but not
everyone realizes that fact. Many also believe social media sites like
MyFaceMeLinkedSpaceBookWeIn will keep “private” things private. The social
media sites may even believe their own hype, but accidents and hacks still
happen. You can block a someone, but that someone has friends who are also
your friends [11]. Things spoken or written can move in mysterious ways.

I feel I was fortunate to have experienced the Internet in the early 90s,
before it commercialized. Back then, every computer was a peer on the
Internet—all IP addresses were public, and anything you put out on the
Internet was, for all intended purposes, public! There's nothing quite like
finding yourself logged into your own computer from Russia (thanks to a
10Base2 [12] network on the same floor as a non-computer science department
with a Unix machine sans a root password). Because of that, I treat
everything I put on the Internet as public (but note that I am not giving up
my rights to what I say). If I don't want it known, I don't put it on the
Internet.

Daniel goes on to state:

> The content creator, after all, is the only person who has the right to
> make that decision, they are the only one who knows the audience they are
> willing to share something with, and the only ones who are the arbiter of
> that.
>

“Ephemera, or the Consciousness of Forgetting [13]”

To me, that sounds like what Daniel really wants is DRM (Digital Rights
Management) [14], which is a controversial issue on the Internet. Bits have
no color [15], but that still doesn't keep people from trying to colorize the
bits, and others mentioning that bits have no color and doing what they will
with the bits in question. It's not an easy problem, nor is it just a
technical problem.

You put content on the Internet. You are now a publisher with a world wide
audience.

[1] gopher://zaibatsu.circumlunar.space:70/0/~solderpunk/phlog/the-individual-%20archivist-and-ghosts-of-gophers-past.txt
[2] gopher://ascraeus.org:70/0/phlog/034.txt
[3] http://www.conman.org/people/spc/writings/murphy/
[4] https://libguides.fau.edu/student_newspapers
[5] https://fau.edu/
[6] https://www.youtube.com/user/austinmcconnell/videos
[7] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tyQAVqf8jnA
[8] https://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0984124314/conmanlaborat-
[9] https://www.wipo.int/treaties/en/ip/berne/
[10] https://archive.org/
[11] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Six_degrees_of_separation
[12] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/10BASE2
[13] gopher://ascraeus.org:70/0/phlog/034.txt
[14] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_rights_management
[15] https://ansuz.sooke.bc.ca/entry/23

Email author at [email protected]

You are viewing proxied material from gopher.conman.org. The copyright of proxied material belongs to its original authors. Any comments or complaints in relation to proxied material should be directed to the original authors of the content concerned. Please see the disclaimer for more details.