* * * * *

        Does the removal of the audio from this video make it ironic?

> This video previously contained a copyrighted audio track. Due to a claim
> by a copyright holder, the audio track has been muted.
>

Yeah, that happens on YouTube [1]. But for some reason, the removal of the
audio track on Anna's performance [2] of “XXXX You [3]” just makes it that
much better, because she's “performing” it using sign langauge.

How appropriate.

[1] https://www.youtube.com/
[2] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sv3tadz5Q3o
[3] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2mkTPgZZXnU

Email author at [email protected]

You are viewing proxied material from gopher.conman.org. The copyright of proxied material belongs to its original authors. Any comments or complaints in relation to proxied material should be directed to the original authors of the content concerned. Please see the disclaimer for more details.