* * * * *
And of course, it was related to spam
> OK, so why is any of this information—about a company completely unrelated
> to Six Apart—important background? Because according to a post on the North
> American Network Operators Group mailing list, at some point yesterday the
> people at Blue Security decided that the best way to deal with the attack
> was to point the hostname www.bluesecurity.com to their TypePad-hosted
> weblog, bluesecurity.blogs.com [1].
>
Via shadesong [2], “The dishonor of Blue Security [3]”
Changing DNS (Domain Name Service) records to fend off a DDoS (Distributed
Denial of Service) attack is certainly a novel approach to the problem. And
from reading up on Blue Security, their spam fighting approach seemed to have
pissed off the major spammers enough to launch a DDoS against them.
But I suspect this has much larger implications than just if Blue Security
was right in what they did or not—it gives more fuel to the AT&Ts and
Comcasts that want to carve up the Internet into fiefdoms of classed services
[4], for our protection of course.
The little conspriacy theorist [5] inside me wonders if the likes of AT&T and
Comcast aren't indirectly funding spamming companies in the hope of pushing
people over the edge into accepting a more tiered service plan for our
protections, of course.
[1]
http://www.merit.edu/mail.archives/nanog/msg17230.html
[2]
http://shadesong.livejournal.com/2857873.html
[3]
http://q.queso.com/archives/001917
[4]
http://www.savetheinternet.com/
[5]
http://www.crank.net/computer.html
Email author at
[email protected]
