* * * * *
Styling feeds II
The previous entry [1] brings me back to the styling feeds topic [2] I
brought up a week or so ago.
Normally, I tend to quote email headers in posts as:
> <p>
> <b>From:</b> John Doe <<span class="cut">XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX</span>><br>
> <b>To:</b> Sean Conner <
[email protected]><br>
> <b>Subject:</b> You know, your posts are boring<br>
> <b>Date:</b> Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 17:17:17 -0400
> </p>
>
> <p>You know, your posts are getting awfully dull lately ... </p>
>
Which would be rendered as thus:
> **From:** John Doe <XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX>
> **To:** Sean Conner <
[email protected]>
> **Subject:** You know, your posts are boring
> **Date:** Tue, 25 Apr 2006 17:17:17 -0400
>
> You know, your posts are getting awfully dull lately …
>
But there was an entry last month [3] that made me rethink how I wanted to
construct the headers when quoting email—basically, long email headers can
span multiple lines but each subsequent line of a header should be indented
with white space, and with the formatting I have above, that distinction
isn't preserved (as well as the headers inherit the full justification I have
for all my paragraphs, which shouldn't happen either).
So I thought about it, and I decided that really, headers could be construed
as a type of dictionary list—a list of terms (the header name) and their
definitions (the header contents). So the above would be encoded in HTML
(HyperText Markup Language) as:
> <dl>
> <dt>From</dt>
> <dd>John Doe <<span class="cut">XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX</span>></dd>
>
> <dt>To</dt>
> <dd>Sean Conner <
[email protected]></dd>
>
> <dt>Subject</dt>
> <dd>You know, your posts are boring</dd>
>
> <dt>Date</dt>
> <dd>Tue, 25 Apr 2006 17:17:17 -0400</dd>
> </dl>
>
Which I would like to render as:
> From: John Doe <XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX>
> To: Sean Conner <
[email protected]>
> Subject: You know, your posts are boring
> Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 17:17:17 -0400
>
Only if you aren't viewing this on my site with a CSS (Cascading Style Sheet)
capable browser, you won't see the intent I have for formatting, which gets
us back to the post I made last month [4].
Am I the only one that has this concern over how my entries are presented?
Anyway, if the quoted email in the previous entry [5] looks a bit odd, that's
why—you aren't seeing it how I intended it to be seen.
[1]
gopher://gopher.conman.org/0Phlog:2006/04/25.2
[2]
gopher://gopher.conman.org/0Phlog:2006/04/14.1
[3]
gopher://gopher.conman.org/0Phlog:2005/03/29.1
[4]
gopher://gopher.conman.org/0Phlog:2006/03/29.1
[5]
gopher://gopher.conman.org/0Phlog:2006/04/25.2
Email author at
[email protected]