| ---------------------------------------- | |
| Response to yargo re: beat | |
| October 15th, 2017 | |
| ---------------------------------------- | |
| Yargo, I totally agree about the problems with Swatch Internet | |
| time. It frustrates me because I built a metric-time | |
| implementation in high school a few years before Swatch did their | |
| thing, and I was so proud of it. Then Swatch came and squished my | |
| cool teenage thing. | |
| In mine, 1 day was 1 unit. The epoch was unix epoch--because it | |
| was easy--aligned with GMT, with no time zones or daylight | |
| savings. I called it a quant (this part was cheesy) and deciquants | |
| or DQ counted through a 100 intervals of the day (about 14.4 | |
| minutes). Days were just integer counters without respect to year | |
| or month or season or anything. I thought that those should be | |
| descriptors you could add on, like weather. Later I'd think of it | |
| in terms of metadata. Datetime as one float. | |
| Regardless, Swatch Internet time was close to a cool idea. I do | |
| respect that they got rid of timezones. They never really | |
| addressed dates, just time, so that's short sighted too. I guess | |
| I don't have a lot of faith in the crazy mechanisms of a watch | |
| company. | |