Document: FSC-0064
Version: 007
Date: 10-May-1992
InterDomain Message Identification, Gating,
Reply Linking and Addressing
Jamie Penner
1:153/1025
Status of this document:
This FSC suggests a proposed protocol for the FidoNet(r) community,
and requests discussion and suggestions for improvements.
Distribution of this document is unlimited.
Fido and FidoNet are registered marks of Tom Jennings and Fido
Software.
Copyright (C) 1990, 1991, 1992 by Jamie Penner
All Rights Reserved
Originally written: Sept 3, 1990
Revised: November 12, 1990
Revised: June 23, 1991
Revised: August 26, 1991
Revised: January 22, 1992
Revised: February 4, 1992
Revised: February 12, 1992
Use of this proposal is encouraged and permitted by the author without
further notification in any software which is being written to conform
to FTSC specifications.
Suggestions and discussion are strongly encouraged. The author may be
reached at:
[email protected]
[email protected]
Echomail Basics:
All echomail passing through an interdomain echomail gateway
must have all information in the message header changed to
reflect the proper address of the domain in which the messages
are entering. The PATH and SEEN-BY lines should also reflect
these changes with only the SEEN-BY line containing any
information from the domain previous. This information shall
be the single address of the system passing the mail to the
gateway system. In addition, all gateway software should
recognize, by the message itself, whether it has EVER passed
through the gateway in the past. CRC records, SEEN-BY lines,
PATH lines and MSGID lines are not sufficient for this purpose
as most systems purge recorded logs of this info after a given
time.
InterDomain Echomail/Netmail Flags:
-----------------------------------
^ADOMORG: usr.nme@[!][p.f.n.z.]network[.nid][[#nodelist_name][#point[x]]
^ADOMDES: usr.nme@[!][p.f.n.z.]network[.nid][[#nodelist_name][#point[x]]
These lines would be a complete domain signature for any user on
any system in any FTN network.
The DOMORG line would be the actual origin information of the
user and system sending the information.
The DOMDES line would be the actual destination information of
the recipient user and system.
There are essentially two variations to the domain signature.
The ! immediately following the @ denotes a Type B, otherwise
defaulting to Type A.
Type A:
e.g.
[email protected]
This has the complete FTN information needed for any
processor to send the message.
Type B:
e.g. jamie.penner@!signet.admin#ic.signet
The ! immediately preceeding the network signifies that
no FTN information is available but the information
after the # will give the name of the system as denoted
in the nodelist for that network. This way, processors
can be designed in a fashion that they can look up the
system name. Should this be going to a point, the
domain may be:
jamie.penner@!signet.admin#ic.signet#point
If I have two points and I want to send it to a
different point, I might use:
jamie.penner@!signet.admin#ic.signet#point2
The domain identifier in a Type B signature can be
further used for further locating a system if needed.
In both signature types, the nid (network identifier) is
optional (eg fidonet.org or signet.admin - only the
first field actually identifies the network name).
This information is completely dependant upon each
domain. For example I might send this:
rob.macare@!signet.eur.r331#maasstad.bbs
This kind of structure would get the message to the
right system. If there was two of the same system in
Region 331, I could use:
rob.macare@!signet.eur.n4601#maasstad.bbs
This format of domain signatures is provided solely for
compatibility purposes to provide software developers with a
platform on which they can structure new programming techniques
and can be used in conjunction with the other flags as laid out
in this document.
# GateOrigin: zzz:NNN/nnn.ppp@dmn (note leading space)
This line is currently inserted into all stripped down echomail
passing through interdomain gateways by GateWorks. This allows
the message overhead to be cut down by properly replacing the
origin line for users to read in the text yet, not creating a
second full originline. This line shall be added immediately
before the tearline with a single blank line following it.
e.g. # GateOrigin: 24:24/0.0@signet
^AGATECHK: zzz.NNN.nnn.ppp [zzz.NNN.nnn.ppp] [zzz.NNN.nnn.ppp]
Any echomail passing through a particular gateway should have
this line inserted at the beginning of the message text.
Everytime the message passes through another echomail gateway,
the address would be added to the line. This way, if a message
passes back through with the same ID, it is a known duplicate
and can be vaporized.
e.g. ^AGATECHK: 24.24.0.0 8.8.7001.0
^AMSGORG: <originating-address> <originating-ID>
The MSGORG line keeps a standard original address and message id
in the message for reply, identification, dupe checking, and
origination purpose. This line would vanish and be replaced
with the necessary lines if passed through a gateway.
e.g. ^AMSGORG: 24:24/0.0@signet 0123456789abcdef
The originating ID is no different than other 16 bit IDs being
generated. It must be unique in a sense that no other message
originating from that system will have the same number (at least
within a short time span).
^AGATEWAY: <zonegate-address>
This field is inserted by the packer. The user-defined
zonegate fields give the message its destination to the zonegate
and may be routed through whatever channels to get there.
e.g. ^AGATEWAY: 1:153/
[email protected]
^GRPLY: <zonegate-address> <originating-address>
When replying to a message, this line would be looked up so as
to find the actual message destination and give the system its
zonegate information. If the message passes through a
gateway, the MSGORG line would be removed upon insertion of
this line.
e.g. ^AGRPLY: 1:153/
[email protected] 24:24/0.0@signet
An example echomail message from 24:11/7777.0@signet across the domain
to 1:153/85.0@fidonet should read:
To: Bill Herringshaw, 1:153/85.0@fidonet
From: Jamie Penner, 1:153/1025.0@fidonet
Subject: Testing
AREA: TEST_ECHO
^AGATECHK: 24.24.0.0
^AGRPLY: 1:153/1025.0@fidonet 24:11/7777.0@signet
^ADOMORG:
[email protected]
^ADOMDES:
[email protected]
^APID: RA 1.01
Hi Bill, just testing out this new software
# GateOrigin: 24:11/7777.0@signet
--- GateWorks v4.00a
* Origin: Home of GateWorks!! (1:153/1025.0)
SEEN-BY: 24/0 153/1025
^APATH: 153/1025
An editor programmed to handle these fields would recognize GRPLY line
and know that the message had passed through a gateway. An echomail
reply would simply pass through the gateway. If a netmail reply was
required, this would be the reply message:
To: Jamie Penner, 24:11/7777@signet
From: Bill Herringshaw, 1:153/85.0@fidonet
Subject: Testing
^AGATEWAY: 1:153/1025.0@signet
^AGRPLY: 24:24/0.0@signet 1:153/85.0@fidonet
^ADOMORG:
[email protected]
^ADOMDES:
[email protected]
> Hi Bill, just testing out this new software
Got it here!
via InterMail @ 24:24/0.0@signet, 17:23:17 22 Jan 92
The mailer and/or packer would check for the GATEWAY flag and route the
message through that gateway.
Under this method of flags, all systems in all domains should have
access to the ability to reply via netmail to a system in a different
domain. In addition, by following this specification, all interdomain
echomail should be clean and troublefree. This eliminates the need for
some of the other ^A lines being used.
It is the intention that all addresses in these flags may use the 5d
addressing scheme, or either of the Type A or B domain signatures. The
software should be written to determine the type of address used and
manipulate the situation accordingly.
The following list of software may be incomplete but lists all software
currently available or under development using this spec:
GateWorks v4.00
ContactBBS
TOSSworks
FASTmail
<EOF>