These two functions are the same. The example calls would show
that. Do you see the difference between the two functions? This
was very cool for me. After I wrote the first version some past
memory popped into my head about a function that just resolves to
itself. I even knew to call it the identity function. It must
have been explained to me at some point, idk. Anyways, sure enough
common-lisp has an identity function.
To be honest I don't mind using the lambda version, because I am
deliberately being unsophisticated now in learning and playing with
common-lisp. But I do prefer the identity function version, because
the intention is obvious.
Oh if i buried the lead... The whole point of this is that *this*
example shows to me the utility of the identity function. I must
have known about it before not got the *why* of it.