// Test for message: cannot assign to '%s' from '%s' [171]
/* lint1-extra-flags: -X 351 */
struct s {
int member;
};
/*ARGSUSED*/
void
example(int i, void *vp, struct s *s)
{
/* expect+1: error: cannot assign to 'int' from 'struct s' [171] */
i = *s;
/* expect+1: error: cannot assign to 'struct s' from 'int' [171] */
*s = i;
/* expect+1: error: cannot assign to 'pointer to void' from 'struct s' [171] */
vp = *s;
/* expect+1: error: cannot assign to 'struct s' from 'pointer to void' [171] */
*s = vp;
}
/*
* C99 6.5.2.5 says that a compound literal evaluates to an unnamed object
* with automatic storage duration, like any normal named object. It is an
* lvalue, which means that it is possible to take the address of the object.
* Seen in external/mpl/bind/dist/lib/dns/rbtdb.c, update_rrsetstats.
*
* Before init.c 1.111 from 2021-03-23, lint could not handle these nested
* initializations (the outer one for the variable 'p', the inner one for the
* compound literal) and wrongly complained about a type mismatch between
* 'struct point' and 'pointer to struct point'.
*/
void
pointer_to_compound_literal(void)
{
struct point {
int x;
int y;
};
struct point *p = &(struct point){
12, 5,
};
/*
* A sizeof expression is another way to create nested
* initializations.
*/
struct point p2 = {
(int)sizeof(struct point){
(int)sizeof(struct point){
(int)sizeof(struct point){
(int)sizeof(struct point){
0,
0,
},
0,
},
0,
},
0,
},
0,
};
}
