# Check for stdbool.h that conforms to C99.
dnl Copyright (C) 2002-2006 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
dnl This file is free software; the Free Software Foundation
dnl gives unlimited permission to copy and/or distribute it,
dnl with or without modifications, as long as this notice is preserved.
# Prepare for substituting <stdbool.h> if it is not supported.
AC_DEFUN([AM_STDBOOL_H],
[
AC_REQUIRE([AC_HEADER_STDBOOL])
# Define two additional variables used in the Makefile substitution.
if test "$ac_cv_header_stdbool_h" = yes; then
STDBOOL_H=''
else
STDBOOL_H='stdbool.h'
fi
AC_SUBST([STDBOOL_H])
if test "$ac_cv_type__Bool" = yes; then
HAVE__BOOL=1
else
HAVE__BOOL=0
fi
AC_SUBST([HAVE__BOOL])
])
# AM_STDBOOL_H will be renamed to gl_STDBOOL_H in the future.
AC_DEFUN([gl_STDBOOL_H], [AM_STDBOOL_H])
# This macro is only needed in autoconf <= 2.59. Newer versions of autoconf
# have this macro built-in.
AC_DEFUN([AC_HEADER_STDBOOL],
[AC_CACHE_CHECK([for stdbool.h that conforms to C99],
[ac_cv_header_stdbool_h],
[AC_TRY_COMPILE(
[
#include <stdbool.h>
#ifndef bool
"error: bool is not defined"
#endif
#ifndef false
"error: false is not defined"
#endif
#if false
"error: false is not 0"
#endif
#ifndef true
"error: true is not defined"
#endif
#if true != 1
"error: true is not 1"
#endif
#ifndef __bool_true_false_are_defined
"error: __bool_true_false_are_defined is not defined"
#endif
struct s { _Bool s: 1; _Bool t; } s;
char a[true == 1 ? 1 : -1];
char b[false == 0 ? 1 : -1];
char c[__bool_true_false_are_defined == 1 ? 1 : -1];
char d[(bool) 0.5 == true ? 1 : -1];
bool e = &s;
char f[(_Bool) 0.0 == false ? 1 : -1];
char g[true];
char h[sizeof (_Bool)];
char i[sizeof s.t];
enum { j = false, k = true, l = false * true, m = true * 256 };
_Bool n[m];
char o[sizeof n == m * sizeof n[0] ? 1 : -1];
char p[-1 - (_Bool) 0 < 0 && -1 - (bool) 0 < 0 ? 1 : -1];
#if defined __xlc__ || defined __GNUC__
/* Catch a bug in IBM AIX xlc compiler version 6.0.0.0
reported by James Lemley on 2005-10-05; see
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-coreutils/2005-10/msg00086.html
This test is not quite right, since xlc is allowed to
reject this program, as the initializer for xlcbug is
not one of the forms that C requires support for.
However, doing the test right would require a run-time
test, and that would make cross-compilation harder.
Let us hope that IBM fixes the xlc bug, and also adds
support for this kind of constant expression. In the
meantime, this test will reject xlc, which is OK, since
our stdbool.h substitute should suffice. We also test
this with GCC, where it should work, to detect more
quickly whether someone messes up the test in the
future. */
char digs[] = "0123456789";
int xlcbug = 1 / (&(digs + 5)[-2 + (bool) 1] == &digs[4] ? 1 : -1);
#endif
/* Catch a bug in an HP-UX C compiler. See
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2003-12/msg02303.html
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-coreutils/2005-11/msg00161.html
*/
_Bool q = true;
_Bool *pq = &q;
],
[
*pq |= q;
*pq |= ! q;
/* Refer to every declared value, to avoid compiler optimizations. */
return (!a + !b + !c + !d + !e + !f + !g + !h + !i + !!j + !k + !!l
+ !m + !n + !o + !p + !q + !pq);
],
[ac_cv_header_stdbool_h=yes],
[ac_cv_header_stdbool_h=no])])
AC_CHECK_TYPES([_Bool])
if test $ac_cv_header_stdbool_h = yes; then
AC_DEFINE(HAVE_STDBOOL_H, 1, [Define to 1 if stdbool.h conforms to C99.])
fi])
