1  2004-06-14 10:17:05.850284 MPLS (label 100656, tc 6, [S], ttl 64)
       IP (tos 0xc0, ttl 64, id 40719, offset 0, flags [none], proto TCP (6), length 71)
   12.4.4.4.4100 > 12.8.8.8.179: Flags [P.], cksum 0xfd1b (correct), seq 1860641958:1860641977, ack 2969468967, win 16384, options [nop,nop,TS val 84784152 ecr 84770238], length 19: BGP
       Keepalive Message (4), length: 19
   2  2004-06-14 10:17:08.118493 MPLS (label 100688, tc 7, [S], ttl 255)
       IP (tos 0x0, ttl 64, id 40723, offset 0, flags [none], proto UDP (17), length 76)
   12.4.4.4.4786 > 127.0.0.1.3503: [udp sum ok]
       LSP-PINGv1, msg-type: MPLS Echo Request (1), length: 48
         reply-mode: Reply via an IPv4/IPv6 UDP packet (2)
         Return Code: No return code or return code contained in the Error Code TLV (0)
         Return Subcode: (0)
         Sender Handle: 0x00000000, Sequence: 1
         Sender Timestamp: 1087208228.000027564 (1934-06-15T10:17:08Z) Receiver Timestamp: no timestamp
         Target FEC Stack TLV (1), length: 12
           LDP IPv4 prefix subTLV (1), length: 5
             12.1.1.1/32
             0x0000:  0c01 0101 20
           0x0000:  0001 0005 0c01 0101 2000 0000
   3  2004-06-14 10:17:08.119504 IP (tos 0xc0, ttl 62, id 50878, offset 0, flags [none], proto UDP (17), length 60)
   10.20.0.1.3503 > 12.4.4.4.4786: [udp sum ok]
       LSP-PINGv1, msg-type: MPLS Echo Reply (2), length: 32
         reply-mode: Reply via an IPv4/IPv6 UDP packet (2)
         Return Code: Replying router is an egress for the FEC at stack depth 0 (3)
         Return Subcode: (0)
         Sender Handle: 0x00000000, Sequence: 1
         Sender Timestamp: 1087208228.000027564 (1934-06-15T10:17:08Z) Receiver Timestamp: 1087208228.000027928 (1934-06-15T10:17:08Z)
   4  2004-06-14 10:17:08.878375 MPLS (label 100704, tc 6, [S], ttl 64)
       IP (tos 0xc0, ttl 64, id 40725, offset 0, flags [none], proto TCP (6), length 71)
   12.4.4.4.2006 > 12.1.1.1.179: Flags [P.], cksum 0x6c0d (correct), seq 399708866:399708885, ack 708613212, win 16384, options [nop,nop,TS val 84784455 ecr 130411], length 19: BGP
       Keepalive Message (4), length: 19
   5  2004-06-14 10:17:08.978295 MPLS (label 100704, tc 6, [S], ttl 64)
       IP (tos 0xc0, ttl 64, id 40726, offset 0, flags [none], proto TCP (6), length 52)
   12.4.4.4.2006 > 12.1.1.1.179: Flags [.], cksum 0x6451 (correct), seq 19, ack 20, win 16384, options [nop,nop,TS val 84784465 ecr 133413], length 0
   6  2004-06-14 10:17:09.128397 MPLS (label 100688, tc 7, [S], ttl 255)
       IP (tos 0x0, ttl 64, id 40727, offset 0, flags [none], proto UDP (17), length 76)
   12.4.4.4.4786 > 127.0.0.1.3503: [udp sum ok]
       LSP-PINGv1, msg-type: MPLS Echo Request (1), length: 48
         reply-mode: Reply via an IPv4/IPv6 UDP packet (2)
         Return Code: No return code or return code contained in the Error Code TLV (0)
         Return Subcode: (0)
         Sender Handle: 0x00000000, Sequence: 2
         Sender Timestamp: 1087208229.000029880 (1934-06-15T10:17:09Z) Receiver Timestamp: no timestamp
         Target FEC Stack TLV (1), length: 12
           LDP IPv4 prefix subTLV (1), length: 5
             12.1.1.1/32
             0x0000:  0c01 0101 20
           0x0000:  0001 0005 0c01 0101 2000 0000
   7  2004-06-14 10:17:09.129192 IP (tos 0xc0, ttl 62, id 50880, offset 0, flags [none], proto UDP (17), length 60)
   10.20.0.1.3503 > 12.4.4.4.4786: [udp sum ok]
       LSP-PINGv1, msg-type: MPLS Echo Reply (2), length: 32
         reply-mode: Reply via an IPv4/IPv6 UDP packet (2)
         Return Code: Replying router is an egress for the FEC at stack depth 0 (3)
         Return Subcode: (0)
         Sender Handle: 0x00000000, Sequence: 2
         Sender Timestamp: 1087208229.000029880 (1934-06-15T10:17:09Z) Receiver Timestamp: 1087208229.000030186 (1934-06-15T10:17:09Z)
   8  2004-06-14 10:17:10.128607 MPLS (label 100688, tc 7, [S], ttl 255)
       IP (tos 0x0, ttl 64, id 40729, offset 0, flags [none], proto UDP (17), length 76)
   12.4.4.4.4786 > 127.0.0.1.3503: [udp sum ok]
       LSP-PINGv1, msg-type: MPLS Echo Request (1), length: 48
         reply-mode: Reply via an IPv4/IPv6 UDP packet (2)
         Return Code: No return code or return code contained in the Error Code TLV (0)
         Return Subcode: (0)
         Sender Handle: 0x00000000, Sequence: 3
         Sender Timestamp: 1087208230.000029928 (1934-06-15T10:17:10Z) Receiver Timestamp: no timestamp
         Target FEC Stack TLV (1), length: 12
           LDP IPv4 prefix subTLV (1), length: 5
             12.1.1.1/32
             0x0000:  0c01 0101 20
           0x0000:  0001 0005 0c01 0101 2000 0000
   9  2004-06-14 10:17:10.129475 IP (tos 0xc0, ttl 62, id 50882, offset 0, flags [none], proto UDP (17), length 60)
   10.20.0.1.3503 > 12.4.4.4.4786: [udp sum ok]
       LSP-PINGv1, msg-type: MPLS Echo Reply (2), length: 32
         reply-mode: Reply via an IPv4/IPv6 UDP packet (2)
         Return Code: Replying router is an egress for the FEC at stack depth 0 (3)
         Return Subcode: (0)
         Sender Handle: 0x00000000, Sequence: 3
         Sender Timestamp: 1087208230.000029928 (1934-06-15T10:17:10Z) Receiver Timestamp: 1087208230.000030250 (1934-06-15T10:17:10Z)
  10  2004-06-14 10:17:11.128577 MPLS (label 100688, tc 7, [S], ttl 255)
       IP (tos 0x0, ttl 64, id 40731, offset 0, flags [none], proto UDP (17), length 76)
   12.4.4.4.4786 > 127.0.0.1.3503: [udp sum ok]
       LSP-PINGv1, msg-type: MPLS Echo Request (1), length: 48
         reply-mode: Reply via an IPv4/IPv6 UDP packet (2)
         Return Code: No return code or return code contained in the Error Code TLV (0)
         Return Subcode: (0)
         Sender Handle: 0x00000000, Sequence: 4
         Sender Timestamp: 1087208231.000029918 (1934-06-15T10:17:11Z) Receiver Timestamp: no timestamp
         Target FEC Stack TLV (1), length: 12
           LDP IPv4 prefix subTLV (1), length: 5
             12.1.1.1/32
             0x0000:  0c01 0101 20
           0x0000:  0001 0005 0c01 0101 2000 0000
  11  2004-06-14 10:17:11.129418 IP (tos 0xc0, ttl 62, id 50883, offset 0, flags [none], proto UDP (17), length 60)
   10.20.0.1.3503 > 12.4.4.4.4786: [udp sum ok]
       LSP-PINGv1, msg-type: MPLS Echo Reply (2), length: 32
         reply-mode: Reply via an IPv4/IPv6 UDP packet (2)
         Return Code: Replying router is an egress for the FEC at stack depth 0 (3)
         Return Subcode: (0)
         Sender Handle: 0x00000000, Sequence: 4
         Sender Timestamp: 1087208231.000029918 (1934-06-15T10:17:11Z) Receiver Timestamp: 1087208231.000030237 (1934-06-15T10:17:11Z)
  12  2004-06-14 10:17:12.128655 MPLS (label 100688, tc 7, [S], ttl 255)
       IP (tos 0x0, ttl 64, id 40733, offset 0, flags [none], proto UDP (17), length 76)
   12.4.4.4.4786 > 127.0.0.1.3503: [udp sum ok]
       LSP-PINGv1, msg-type: MPLS Echo Request (1), length: 48
         reply-mode: Reply via an IPv4/IPv6 UDP packet (2)
         Return Code: No return code or return code contained in the Error Code TLV (0)
         Return Subcode: (0)
         Sender Handle: 0x00000000, Sequence: 5
         Sender Timestamp: 1087208232.000029937 (1934-06-15T10:17:12Z) Receiver Timestamp: no timestamp
         Target FEC Stack TLV (1), length: 12
           LDP IPv4 prefix subTLV (1), length: 5
             12.1.1.1/32
             0x0000:  0c01 0101 20
           0x0000:  0001 0005 0c01 0101 2000 0000
  13  2004-06-14 10:17:12.129573 IP (tos 0xc0, ttl 62, id 50886, offset 0, flags [none], proto UDP (17), length 60)
   10.20.0.1.3503 > 12.4.4.4.4786: [udp sum ok]
       LSP-PINGv1, msg-type: MPLS Echo Reply (2), length: 32
         reply-mode: Reply via an IPv4/IPv6 UDP packet (2)
         Return Code: Replying router is an egress for the FEC at stack depth 0 (3)
         Return Subcode: (0)
         Sender Handle: 0x00000000, Sequence: 5
         Sender Timestamp: 1087208232.000029937 (1934-06-15T10:17:12Z) Receiver Timestamp: 1087208232.000030273 (1934-06-15T10:17:12Z)

You are viewing proxied material from ftp.icm.edu.pl. The copyright of proxied material belongs to its original authors. Any comments or complaints in relation to proxied material should be directed to the original authors of the content concerned. Please see the disclaimer for more details.