Path: senator-bedfellow.mit.edu!bloom-beacon.mit.edu!news-out.cwix.com!newsfeed.cwix.com!chnws02.mediaone.net!chnws05.ne.mediaone.net!24.128.44.7!typhoon.ne.mediaone.net.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "atwood" <
[email protected]>
Newsgroups: talk.politics.guns
References: <talk-politics-guns/pro-gun-faq/
[email protected]>
Subject: talk.politics.guns Official Pro-Gun FAQ 3/3
Lines: 851
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.3018.1300
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.3018.1300
Message-ID: <
[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2000 13:27:26 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 24.128.29.15
X-Complaints-To:
[email protected]
X-Trace: typhoon.ne.mediaone.net 966259646 24.128.29.15 (Mon, 14 Aug 2000 09:27:26 EDT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2000 09:27:26 EDT
Organization: Road Runner
Xref: senator-bedfellow.mit.edu talk.politics.guns:1253488
Post by Dan Day, July 16, 2000:
"In short, I think the proper approach is to say that yes, the Second
Amendment was written to protect all arms, and thus nuclear weapons are
indeed covered by it. "
Post by "digger," July 13, 2000:
"Personal nukes? Far-fetched right now, but in the future? And, what if we
allow ONLY the 'government' to own personal nukes?"
Post by pyotr filipivich, July 11, 2000:
"Although I might not approve of someone having a fully functional nuke, I
will not say they should be barred by law from having one."
Post by "ttk," July 11, 2000:
"A citizen in a rural setting should be free to play with weapons, even at
their own risk, as long as they were not putting others at risk. If the
nearest other citizen's property were far enough away, then this could give
them the freedom to store or experiment with anything up to and including
fuel-air bombs."
Post by "The Trainers," July 11, 2000:
"There is (sic) NO LAWS preventing anyone who can afford one to own a REAL
TANK! There is also a guy on the next block in my nice little almost
crime-free city who owns an armored personnel carrier WITH a .50cal machine
gun!"
Post by Matt Nichols, July 11, 2000:
"I believe that citizens should be able to own whatever they can afford and
reasonably maintain. I have no objection to people owning artillery,
explosives, tanks, military aircraft,
rockets, etc. Of course, this includes smaller weapons as well."
Post by Eric Pinnell, July 10, 2000:
". the US army is unconstitutional, so the possession of nuclear weapons in
the hands of private citizens is essential"
Post by Matt Nichols, July 10, 2000:
"Nuclear weapons and other 'weapons of mass destruction' ARE covered by the
Second Amendment, IMHO. I personally would like to see an
'effect-description based' Amendment passed that relegated such weaponry to
exclusive military control, but, barring such an
Amendment, I think all other limiting legislation is technically
unconstitutional.
"Short of weapons restricted to the military by an Amendment that reads
something like '...any weapon that destroys or depopulates an area exceeding
1/2 square mile in a single usage..', I figure if a person can afford and
house the weapon or weapon system, they can have it. Tanks, aircraft,
battleships, I don't care.
"Misuse of such items, of course, should be severely punished."
Post by Julie Cochrane, July 6, 2000:
"Revolution or dictatorship EVENTUALLY is inevitable. We just want to hold
it off for a century or so if we can. Unfortunately, gun 'control' would be
the short route to getting that
revolution right now, such that it could kick off late this year or early
next if Emerson and the elections go exactly wrong."
Post by Eric Pinnell, July 4, 2000:
"You only need enough support to be able to hide from the feds, and to have
a supply of ammo and equipment. The patriot movement alone has some five
million members. That's a big enough user base to ensure that guerillas can
and will have a safe haven in the event of war."
Post by "Bang," May 17, 2000:
"Bang suggests that all antis [editor's note: an "anti" is Bang's term for a
gun control proponent] be carted down to the local packing plant and
butchered. There are an awful lot of homeless people in need of a good meal.
Just think, a homeless family of 20 could gnaw on Rosie's fat ass for a
week."
Post by "George of the Jungle," showing the NRA's attitude toward those who
beg to differ, May 16, 2000:
"The 2nd Amendment is EXACTLY what the NRA says it is. Which is EXACTLY what
over 40 law review articles published in the last 20 years says it is.
"And trolls like you can go fuck yourselves."
Post by "Q," May 16, 2000:
"Before we let you tin-horn tyrants trample on our birthright, we will see
you stacked like cordwood, and being dealt with by bulldozers and lime.
"Now, shit-for-brains, what are YOU prepared to do?
"Fuck off and die."
Post by Tim May, April 24:
"Hide behind your keyboard, while you still can, papa fudgepacker.
"After seeing all this crap about taking Elian from his home by force, all
bets are off on just how long it will be until some of you liberal
chickenshit bastards are going to be resting sunnyside up, six feet down,
when the Revolution starts."
Post by George Cummins, April 23, 2000. An exchange between Atwood & Cummins
on whether the gun lobby considers massacres to be acceptable:
Atwood:
"I have argued several times here, and been accused of being ghoulish for
doing so, that the lunatics of the gun lobby consider massacres to be
acceptable collateral damage. It's obvious that this is your attitude as
well.
Cummins:
"Since 'massacres' hardly ever happen, yes. It's one of the prices we pay
for our 'free' society. Massacres by gun are probably the *least* common of
the lot in any case. Bombs and fire are much more attractive to folks who
are intent on such carnage.
Atwood:
"What about students at Columbine H.S. killed by the TEC-9, and workers in
the office building in San Francisco killed by the TEC-9? They weren't gang
members. It appears that your answer to them and their loved ones is,
'That's life.' Let me correct you. The correct answer is, 'That's death.' "
Cummins:
"That's life. Life's a bitch. Terrible tragedy. One *you* would have made
worse by 'banning' the ineffective weapon they wound up using. And it
doesn't change the fact that making policy for 80 million people based on
the actions of 2 or 3 (or even the deaths of 15) is a *really* bad idea."
Post by "Secret Squirrel," April 22, 2000:
"Be prepared in May for the coming assault. The premise will be that they
are conducting military training exercises. DON'T EVACUATE YOUR HOMES: you
will be disarmed and taken to concentration camps. Be prepared to stand and
fight in place. Form militia units with your neighbors. What they will be
doing is unconstitutional: the states are sovereign, and only Congress can
authorize such actions."
Post by pyotr filipivich, April 21, 2000:
"The government won't ban 'hunting rifles,' they will ban 'dangerously ultra
accurate sniper rifles' instead. And I shall shower them with love tokens
propelled from a symbolic wand of wonderment, for I am the Pink Bunny
Commander of the Tie Die Collective and Sewing Circle."
Post by "Panhead," April 15, 2000, showing a gun nut's true colors when
confronted with an opponent who happens to be gay:
"Randy can NOT eat eggs or milk. Neither can his 'little boy-toy' that he
says he's going to adopt. That's animal fat and proteins. He was obviously
not breast fed as a child or, maybe he was and the sight of his moms one,
non cancerous tit that looked like a fried egg on nail, is what drove him to
homosexuality and vegetarianism. That doesn't explain why he likes man meat,
and dick milk so much though, does it?"
Post by "Secret Squirrel," April 12, 2000:
"I ask all here to open your Bible and in the first few chapters of Genesis
to see "the curse of Cain". That he would be a wanderer, that he would not
till the soil, that he would not work. That is precisely the marxist world
view of the Ashkenazi 'jew'. He goes about relentlessly stirring up dissent
and revolution, takes advantage of the white population at every
opportunity, does ANYTHING but work."
Post by Richard G. Cheek, April 9, 2000:
"I despise you. God, I hope to offend you; I really do. If the kid molesting
thing offends you, so much the better. If I thought there was an even
chance that such accusations could put you on the 'suicide watch', I would
be posting day and night. I hate you, atwood, in a very personal way and
other liars like you and your disgusting perjurer in cheif. This isnt a
game, not at all. I hope to see you in Hell some day, burning in the fires
of Gehenna."
Post by "d'geezer," April 9, 2000, on what gets him aroused:
"My sexual fantasy in this situation tends to be of a woman standing over
dead perp blowing smoke off the end the barrel. Pretty sexy that...yeah,
turns me one. I like strong women, most especially live ones."
Post by "d'geezer," April 6, 2000, on how to cover up a murder of a fleeing
burglar:
"Best to call out to the perp, "opps you dropped something" and when he
turns back to look nail him. The blood spatter evidence with show he turned,
you thought you saw a weapon, etc etc etc. Or can't you trip and have an
accidental discharge like a real man."
Post by Michael C, April 5, 2000:
"Montana, Iowa, Idaho and Texas. Quite a few little steel holes in the
ground there, as well as armor/cavalry bases, which makes a band of rebels
into a negotiating partner at a table. Just a thought, but I haven't
considered it too much myself, being as I just started thinking along these
lines real recently.
"Preparations
"1. Tactics - Offense and Defense
A. Guerilla - Small Scale
B. Guerilla - Large Scale
C. Troop - Small Scale
D. Troop - Large Scale
E. Armor - Small Scale
F. Armor - Large Scale
G. Air Combat
1. Aircraft flight and familiarization
2. Aircraft maneuvers and tactics
3. Planning and executing air attacks
4. Defending against air attacks
5. Specific aircraft tips and FAQ's
H. Sea/Water Way
"2. Logistics
A. Determining necessary supplies for operations
B. Obtaining supplies
C. Supply lines - Their use and maintenance
D. Protecting supply lines
"3. Communications - Radio
A. Radio Theory
B. Established Radio Procedure
C. Cell/Base communications
D. Cryptography for radio
"4. Communications - Data
A. Computer Theory
B. Computer OS
C. Computer Hacking by OS type - Vulnerability Detection and exploitation
D. Crypto for computers
E. Defending against hacking
"5. Weapons
A. Firearms - Personal
1. List firearm stats and weapon use and maintenance manuals
B. Unit - Machine guns, mortars, grenades, grenade launchers, etc
2. List weapon stats and weapon use and maintenance manuals
C. Heavy - Artillery, Armor, Mines
3. List weapon stats and weapon use and maintenance manuals
D. Unconventional - Nuc/Bio/Chem weapons
1. List weapon stats and weapon use and maintenance manuals
"6. Public Relations
A. Convering population to the cause
B. Flushing out plants and those against cause
C. Who to and not to attack
D. Propaganda aka marketing"
Post by "Mixmaster," March 30, 2000:
"It is Congress who makes the laws, and they are forbidden by the Bill of
Rights to infringe on our 'RIGHT' to bear arms. This is just another
attempt by ZOG and the global gangsters (multinational companies) to 'lie'
to the American people. It is now time to indict and impeach Clinton and his
Jew government, and charge them with Treason, Sedition, and Abuse of Power!"
Post by "PORCH DOG," March 26, 2000:
"I am 61 years old. The time for my fist fighting, is over. If a younger man
or teenager tries,
to hurt me. With fist, knife, club, or gun, I will blow it's GOD dam head
off.
"And then let the state or feds try to condemn me. And you liberal ass
wipers out there, let me tell this. You best go see your shrink to get some
DE-FUCK pills. Because you see ass wipers
nobody, is tacking my guns from me, nobody."
Post by redrum, March 25, 2000:
"Ammerica (sic) is beyond fixing. Best to nuke the place and start over."
Post by Jim String, March 18, 2000:
"Nope, you fuckers aren't going to get us to register or turn in our guns.
Not a chance. We'll kill you first. That's a promise."
Post by Pat Hines, March 18, 2000:
"Thanks fruitwood, you've (j)ust moved another American citizen into my
camp, the one where we seek out traitors like you and attach them to the
nearest street light pole.
Whatyoudonow, shitwood?
Post by Pat Hines, Feb. 12, 2000, in defense of Abraham Lincoln's assassin:
"Sumner got much less than he deserved and Booth is a hero. Lincoln was the
most murderous president in history, being responsible for the deaths of
nearly one million people on American soil. One can only muse about what
would have happened if Booth had been able to act three years earlier."
Post by David Lentz, Feb. 12, 2000:
"But some organizations like HCI, some politician like B. J. Clinton, and
some individuals like Atwood would rather see more school shooting than
armed students. Arming teachers would prove how stupid the idea of schools
as a gun free zone really is."
Post by "Who Wants To Know," Jan. 23, 2000:
"Get the COWARDS who live next-door and nearby to fight with you. How you
muster your local militia is your business, but options include burning
houses if they refuse. Tell them they are going to fight with you to defend
the neighborhood, or die, and must decide instantly. A neighbors proclaimed
refusal to fight represents cowardice in the face of the enemy, for which
the military punishment is DEATH. Under "martial" law (meaning MILITARY
law), militias (which are the unorganized MILITARY of the country) outrank
police in authority (and firepower) and apply MILITARY rules.
"Several state militia leaders have already stated that a declaration of
martial law by Klinton means CIVIL WAR."
Post by Pat Hines, Dec. 31, 1999
"That only four BATF thugs were killed is really too bad. Twenty wouldn't
have been enough at WACO."
Post by Tom Huffman, Dec. 22, 1999:
"Actually, Mike, I've been wondering the same thing. This is probably the
biggest live televised event every year, and watched all over the US and
other countries. It would be the perfect place
to cause the greatest amount of panic and havoc with one concentrated bunch
of explosives.
"The only thing that could make it worse would be if the perpetrators of
this crime got ahold of a nuclear device they could sneak in.
"Of course, the upside is that we wouldn't have NYC to deal with any more.
Maybe Teddy Kennedy, Sarah Brady, and the other anti-gun weasels would be
there celebrating, and we could ... well, never mind, I would sound too
negative ... and get my hopes up."
Post by "Hank," Dec. 18, 1999:
"I would rather live in a country that has a high crime rate than live in a
country that is crime free, but has gun controls. Unfortunately the
foundations on which our great country was founded, are slowly being
destroyed. First the slaves were freed, then women were given the right to
vote, now Liberals and foreigners want to control our guns."
Post by Mark Denman, Dec. 18, 1999:
"Shooting criminals and tyrants is a sport, isn't it? My 12 gauge is Y2K
ready."
Post by "comcentr," Dec. 18, 1999:
"Like it or not, let's face it. The real and truthful reason for our 2nd
Amendment was for the purpose of providing the people of this great land of
America with the means to violently overthrow, by force of arms, the US
Government if it ever became tyrannical or headed in the direction of a
dictatorship. There is no question that this is precisely what the Socialist
Democrats now want. They are thirsting for a disarmed American public in
order that they may do whatever they wish for the 'new world socialist order
' to be controlled by the self appointed Elite and who are represented by
the Klintons, Gores, Shumers, etc."
Post by Tim May, Dec. 19, 1999
"Gun grabbers should be killed."
--Tim May
"They pulled the pin ... now we're all just waiting."
Post by Mike Eglestone, Sept. 11, 1999
"If this is an example of the HONESTY in discourse and debate that we can
expect from those folks who advocate more gun laws, then it would seem to me
that, in the long run, shooting the bastards NOW would save us a
considerable amount of time - IOW, we're going to have to shoot them
eventually; why put it off?"
Post/threat/rant by Jim String, Sept. 11, 1999
"Anyone attempting to register my firearms will be killed as a domestic
enemy of the Constitution. I obey all of my state's laws regarding firearms
because they are mostly reasonable at the present time. I obey federal laws
regarding firearms also, mainly because full autos and short shotguns are
not very useful and if I can't get a Glock in .380 because it's a
'niggertown saturday night special' "
Post/threat by Jim String, Sept. 9, 1999
"Yep. If you know any gun grabbers then make it a point to not hang around
with them. Being around them is not likely to be very safe for much longer."
Post by Greg Dean, t.p.g., Sept. 7, 1999
"It has dawned on me that the biggest reason that gun control is even an
issue is that Americans avoid even thinking about death. They put their
parents in homes so that they will not see them age. They hide death and
sickness in hospitals. In fact everything unpleasant, even the poor and the
underclass, are hidden away.
"Thus when Death comes, it is a shock. So Americans form groups to fight
Death. Like MADD. Or AIDS groups. Much of gun control is this fear of Death.
If more Americans were forced to join the military or law enforcement or
fire fighting, they might see life in its rawness. If they just were more
involved with family, especially multi-generations, then death would not be
such a big deal."
Post by Eric Pinnell, t.p.g., Sept. 1, 1999
"If they will not listen to the thunder of our words, they shall taste the
thunder of our guns. Deal with it."
Post by Frank J. Zember, t.p.g., Aug. 31, 1999
"If we wanted to share a name with terrorists, we should choose something
like BATF or FBI."
Post by Eric Pinnell, t.p.g., Aug. 30 1999
"Pat, I'll mail you the plans for the Striker PGM and send you a parts list
some time. Anyone who uses hands for killing is foolish. Far better to turn
their buildings and infrastructure into
rubble."
Post by Jim String, t.p.g., Aug. 28, 1999
"The 2nd Amendment has nothing to do with hunting and only peripherally has
anything to do with self-defense. It's all about the 'security of a free
state' and the means to resist tyranny. Roughly translated, that means
politician hunting as a last resort. Sorry if that bothers you, but that's
the way it is. Insurrection is illegal, killing foreign and domestic enemies
of the Constitution is not and that's precisely what the Founding Fathers
had in mind. The 2nd is about preserving the Constitution and Constitutional
government. In modern terms, it's a pretty slick idea"
Posted by John Brophy, t.p.g., Aug. 24, 1999
"In effect, the Revolutionary War was started over the government
attempting to impose 'gun control'. It is important to remember that
our government of that day was King George. King George is alive and
well in Washington DC, every Statehouse and every City Council chamber
in the land...
" As Ben Franklin might have said, Get thy kit together, revolution is
afoot..."
Dialogue between "redrum" and Robert Frenchu, t.p.g., Aug. 13, 1999
>Never mind all my talk about purchasing a gun. I live in Sacramento, CA
>and I've learned that it's all but illegal to purchase a gun here
>without putting out a big sign for the gun grabbers saying COME AND GET
>ME.
So? Then add yourself to the list so they have one more person to
"come get." Do it now, then you can have some fun shooting and
practicing while we work to castrate these morons.
>I guess I'm just gonna have to stay out of your revolution.
Son, you're in it whether you want to be or not. You have a chance to
prepare yourself, I suggest you take that chance.
Posted by Dick Eastman, t.p.g., Aug. 13, 1999
"In the U.S. fear of starvation as the infrastructure crashes will induce
rioting and looting. The idea is that Americans kill themselves. It is a
plot as cleaver as Gideon in the Hebrew Scriptures who caused the Midianites
to kill each other using only a few bowels, some torches and a few trumpets
(History�s first recorded total info-war victory!!!) God help us. Our enemy
expects us to panic and kill each other off, so that when the Boeing Planes
fly in the Chinese-Vietnamese-Korean Military Divisions (the three largest
armies in the world) they will have little to do but �mop up� and take
over---And their supply lines will not be short as they will be able to live
on the Y2K rations we were manipulated into storing for them."
Posted by Henry Glenworth, t.p.g., Aug. 11, 1999
"No, hopefully you in fact will die of extreme old age after spending at
least fifty years paralyzed and bedridden"
Posted by Mark Muscella, t.p.g, Aug. 11, 1999
"I'm on my way to Finland to change your mind, they do sell ax's (sic) don't
they? Oh I all (sic) most forgot it's 1999 I'll bring my chainsaw. Why don't
you mind your own business you twit"
Posted by Adam Pearson, t.p.g., Aug. 11, 1999
"O.K. I just bought a brand spanking new AR-15, 100 pre-ban 30 round mags,
500 rounds of 5.56, and have 3000 more rounds of 5.56 due to arrive
tomorrow."
Posted by Tim May, t.p.g., Aug. 10, 1999
"Yes, most of my gun-owning friends feel the same way. They are stocking up
in record numbers on battle rifles, sniper rifles, etc., and buying books on
how to make C-4, Claymore mines, Astrolight, and other such things. I'm
just willing to publically (sic) say what most folks with jobs are
unprepared to say publically (sic)"
Posted by Tim May, t.p.g., Aug. 10, 1999
"I've been stocking up on high capacity magazines, several thousand rounds
of .308, and a couple more FN-FAL and HK91 battle rifles.
"War with the gun grabbers is coming, and tens of thousands of them need to
be dealt with."
Posted by "redrum," t.p.g., Aug. 7, 1999
"The Constitution has failed. It's time for a radically new way of doing
things, just like the Constitution was a radically new way of doing things
in 1787. Fortunately there is such a system out there. The anarchist FAQ ."
Posted by John Dechon, t.p.g., Aug. 7, 1999
"Just remember ALL these people who are causing these problems for
us--politicians, news anchors, media owners, Hollywood people, liberal
police chiefs and others--so they can be held accountable after the
revolution along with all of their supporters...
"It's becoming evident that a confrontation is going to be the only way when
working 'with the system' doesn't get results and the government gets ever
more intrusive/oppressive. Isn't that what happened with the civil rights
and anti-Vietnam war movements? .
"Unless things start going our way soon, I don't see any other way to stop
this trend let alone stop the moral decline of this country. "
Posted by "Greg", t.p.g., Aug, 8, 1999
"Wake up, dude. It is coming. Very soon. The federal government has two
options for you- submit or die. Which do you think those who know truth and
justice will accept? Do you think they will be able to look at themselves in
the mirror and continue on when their friends are
being taken away to 're education centers'? Remember, we are talking about
those who think and feel, not the morally defecient (sic) who want to sin
and are trying desparately (sic) to convince themselves by trying to
convince us that they are okay.
Posted by Tim May, t.p.g., Aug. 7, 1999
"Much as I'd like to trigger my Claymores and use my .308 assault rifles to
kill as many 'home invaders' as possible, I surmise that 30 of them in their
jack boots and their Nomex balaclavas would kill me before I could kill more
than a couple of them, if that"
Posted by Steve Fischer, t.p.g., Aug. 8, 1999
Atwood: "I don't approve of vigilante groups. I think the rightwingnut gun
freaks want to replace the police with their vigilante groups."
Fischer: "If they are trained to follow the same laws as the cops, what is
the difference?"
Posted by James F. Mayer, t.p.g., Aug. 8, 1999
"The police are a vigilante group."
Posted by Frank Ney, t.p.g, Aug. 5, 1999
"He'll get my complaint, at 1200fps, attached to a 280 grain wadcutter."
Posted by David Charles, t.p.g., Aug. 4, 1999
"you call the killing of 12000 to 14000 a year slaughter? Were do you get
your definition of slaughter?"
Posted by "Kyfho," t.p.g., Aug. 3, 1999
"I like owning my own private nuke. I reckon you have indefatiguable (sic)
trust in each government that owns one; perhaps you'd fall prey to a fit of
suffering if you had to live with the fact that anonymous fellow citizens
and/or neighbors had one."
Threat by Gary Miller, t.p.g., Aug. 3, 1999:
"What would you say to a 230 grain chunk of lead coming at you at 1000 fps?
LOSER!"
Post by Jim String, t.p.g, Aug. 1, 1999:
"McVeigh doesn't count, he's just a mass murderer because he didn't have any
sense and struck way too early."
Post by David Steuber, t.p.g, Aug. 1, 1999
"These things have been brought up in t.p.g a number of times. I've often
wished I could own one. The ideal Assault Vehicle for me would be the Hummer
with a .50 BMG caliber machine gun on a roof turret. The gun could be
remotely controlled from inside the vehicle with a joystick.
The next time I look up in my rearview mirror and see nothing but the grill
of a Frieghtliner, I could point the .50 to the rear and light up a sign
that says, 'back off!' "
Post by Cornet Joyce Jr., t.p.g, July 31, 1999:
"I think Americans should arm themselves anyway. As thing are going, the
movie Red Dawn is not far off, and you'll find YOUR National guard joining
in the fray, against YOU, backed by the federal govt.
"Now, do I think America will resist? NO. Califrnians (sic) are sitting like
IDIOTS, as their new marxist governor begins confiscating their so called
'assault' weapons, in direct violation of "ex post facto" protection."
Posted by "DPH" in t.p.g., July 30, 1999:
"We're not going to put up with it, btw. Wanna see another Civil War? Just
try and take our guns."
Posted by Tim May in t.p.g., July 30, 1999:
"There is no point in 'reasonable dialog' with them, or with gun grabbers
here in this newsgroup. It's like discussing a "reasonable compromise" with
a rapist or a thief.
"Guns are meant to be used to protect our rights. Our rights are under
assault. Our guns are needed to kill gun grabbers.
"And they know this, which is why they're racing at high speed to try to
disarm us as quickly and as completely as possible. California even plans
its own version of the Waco killers, its own Special Gun Police. Kicking
down doors, shooting everything that moves inside. The new police state.
"And what happens in Kalifornia will be spreading to other states.
"War is here"
Threat from Michael Cidras, posted on t.p.g, July 30, 1999:
"We take that oath to support and defend the Constitution against all
enemies foreign or DOMESTIC very seriously. Guess where you fall twit"
Posted by Jim String on t.p.g., July 30, 1999:
"I'm scrambling for money to buy more handguns, rifles and shotguns while I
can still get them legally with no paper trail. When registration is
implemented it will be time to use them for what the 2nd Amendment
intended. Wake up and smell the coffee, we will not be slaves and we will
fight"
Posted by gun nut Tim May on t.p.g, July 29, 1999:
"Yes, that's what sniper rifles are for.
"But sometimes you just have to use truck bombs to blow up their office
buildings.
"(Innocents: don't hang out in the lairs of gun grabbing vermin.)"
Different posting, Tim May, on t.p.g., July 29, 1999
"And if things work out right, your kind will be rounded up and dealt with.
"Gun grabbers need to be killed, singly or en masse."
Posted by violent gun nut "DPH," on t.p.g, July 29, 1999
"If they start collecting up guns, without first repealing the 2nd
amendment, then yes, gun grabbers will begin dying en-masse. The ones that
try for my guns will get them 180 grains - 3000 ft/sec at a time"
Posted by wacko Rick Petty, on t.p.g., July 30, 1999
"I predict that a General with a CIA Plastic Pistol will stroll in
(President Clinton's) office and put him out of work."
Posted by gun nut Tim May, on t.p.g., July 30, 1999
"Gun grabbers will someday be rounded up, held for trial, and then
incinerated."
Posted by "DPH," on t.p.g., July 29, 1999
"pass all the laws you want, and you'll be lucky to get 10% compliance on
any registration scheme"
Posted by Tim May, on t.p.g., July 31, 1999
"Time to just do what the right to lifers did to abortionists and their
clinics."
