From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Mon Mar 1 11:18:01 2004 -0800

From [email protected] Mon Mar 1 11:18:01 2004 -0800
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Mon, 1 Mar 2004 11:18:01 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i21JHaUp019926;
Mon, 1 Mar 2004 11:17:36 -0800
Received: from list1.u.washington.edu (list1.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.99])
by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i21JGl9J028379
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO);
Mon, 1 Mar 2004 11:16:48 -0800
Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13])
by list1.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with SMTP id i21JGamU011350;
Mon, 1 Mar 2004 11:16:36 -0800
Received: from mxu7.u.washington.edu (mxu7.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.165])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i21JFoce054316
for <[email protected]>; Mon, 1 Mar 2004 11:15:50 -0800
Received: from mail-out3.apple.com (mail-out3.apple.com [17.254.13.22])
by mxu7.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i21JFnuo030879
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO)
for <[email protected]>; Mon, 1 Mar 2004 11:15:49 -0800
Received: from mailgate1.apple.com (a17-128-100-225.apple.com [17.128.100.225])
by mail-out3.apple.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i21JFnpQ005597
for <[email protected]>; Mon, 1 Mar 2004 11:15:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from relay2.apple.com (relay2.apple.com) by mailgate1.apple.com
(Content Technologies SMTPRS 4.3.6) with ESMTP id
<[email protected]> for
<[email protected]>; Mon, 1 Mar 2004 11:15:49 -0800
Received: from ackema.apple.com (ackema.apple.com [17.202.14.80]) by
relay2.apple.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i21JFlnR023550
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NOT) for
<[email protected]>; Mon, 1 Mar 2004 19:15:47 GMT
Message-Id: <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2004 11:15:48 -0800 (PST)
Sender: [email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
From: Matt Ackeret <[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
Subject: Formatting error message -- why did it come up?
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XXIIIII, Probability=25%, Report='RATWARE_RCVD_BONUS_SPC 2.799, __HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CTYPE_CHARSET_QUOTED 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0'
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN

Part of a message from a mailing list:

without initializing it anywhere, ucontrol wouldn't load (I made that
mistake accidentally). Is that normal ?? That seems stran
[Error: Formatting error: Non-hexadecimal character in QP encoding]

and here's what I see when I show it with full headers...

without initializing it anywhere, ucontrol wouldn't load (I made that=20
mistake accidentally). Is that normal ?? That seems strange. The extern=20=

I declared didn't have anything to do with ucontrol code...

---

As you can see, nothing strange (no pun intended).

Is this something on my end, or something in the message, that is causing
the Formatting error message to show up?
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------
For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see:
http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/
-----------------------------------------------------------------

From [email protected] Tue Mar 2 01:38:13 2004 -0800
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Tue, 2 Mar 2004 01:38:13 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i229c2Ii020900;
Tue, 2 Mar 2004 01:38:02 -0800
Received: from c0.wb5823.thrr.mi.voyager.net (c0.wb5823.thrr.mi.voyager.net [207.89.198.2] (may be forged))
by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with SMTP id i229bBxa028657;
Tue, 2 Mar 2004 01:37:12 -0800
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
From: "Willie Lynn" <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected]
Subject: A real online business
Date: Tue, 02 Mar 2004 14:33:10 +0500
X-Mailer: earthy courtney
least-wale: grimaldi albuquerque aruba
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="--52288744130340416502"
X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XXXXXXXXXIIIIIII, Probability=97%, Report='URI_CLASS_UNCLASSIFIED_DOMAIN 5, MIME_HTML_ONLY_MULTI 4.500, BIZ_TLD 1.251, REMOVE_PAGE 1.210, URI_HEAVY 0.206, HTML_50_70 0.092, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __HAS_X_MAILER 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART_ALT 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CT 0, __UNUSABLE_MSGID 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART 0, __NEW_DOMAIN_EXTENSIONS_2 0, __TAG_EXISTS_BODY 0, __MIME_HTML_ONLY 0, __TAG_EXISTS_META 0, __MIME_HTML 0, __TAG_EXISTS_HTML 0, __TAG_EXISTS_HEAD 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __CTYPE_HAS_BOUNDARY 0'

----52288744130340416502
Content-Type: text/html;
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<html>
<head>
<title>C 2.32.224.81</title>
<meta http-equiv=3D"Content-Type" content=3D"text/html; charset=3Diso-8859=
-1">
</head>

<body>
 
Affiliate programs were never this easy in the past. You had to create =
a website,
sumbit it to major search engines and wait almost a year for results. Wi=
th <a href=3D"http://www.globalmarketing2000.biz/cashinwithgoogle/">my
program</a> you won't have to worry about any of this.

no more <a href=3D"http://www.globalmarketing2000.biz/=
remove.html">emails</a>
please 
</body>
</html>

----52288744130340416502--

From [email protected] Tue Mar 2 03:45:48 2004 -0800
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Tue, 2 Mar 2004 03:45:48 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i22Bjjbw026444;
Tue, 2 Mar 2004 03:45:45 -0800
Received: from villette-2-82-67-173-30.fbx.proxad.net (villette-2-82-67-173-30.fbx.proxad.net [82.67.173.30])
by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with SMTP id i22BiuZI019146;
Tue, 2 Mar 2004 03:44:58 -0800
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
From: "Alonzo Fountain" <[email protected]>
To: [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected],
[email protected]
Subject: Make huge online profits without a website
Date: Tue, 02 Mar 2004 14:44:29 +0300
X-Mailer: basalt kane
abramson-eukaryote: lot oar attestation
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="--085975331286927700"
X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XXXXXXXXXX, Probability=100%, Report='URI_CLASS_UNCLASSIFIED_DOMAIN 5, MIME_HTML_ONLY_MULTI 4.500, SUSPICIOUS_RECIPS 2.799, SORTED_RECIPS 1.332, BIZ_TLD 1.251, REMOVE_PAGE 1.210, URI_HEAVY 0.206, HTML_50_70 0.092, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, TO_HAS_SPACES 0.000, __HAS_X_MAILER 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART_ALT 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __UNUSABLE_MSGID 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART 0, __CTYPE_HAS_BOUNDARY 0, __NEW_DOMAIN_EXTENSIONS_2 0, __TAG_EXISTS_BODY 0, __MIME_HTML_ONLY 0, __TAG_EXISTS_META 0, __MIME_HTML 0, __TAG_EXISTS_HTML 0, __TAG_EXISTS_HEAD 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __CT 0'

----085975331286927700
Content-Type: text/html;
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<html>
<head>
<title>120.152.135.5</title>
<meta http-equiv=3D"Content-Type" content=3D"text/html; charset=3Diso-8859=
-1">
</head>

<body>
 
With <a href=3D"http://www.globalmarketing2000.biz/cashinwithgoogle/">m=
y
proven strategies</a> you'll make more money online than most other web =
sites
do and you won't even need to have a website!

I don't want more <a href=3D"http://www.globalmarketin=
g2000.biz/remove.html">emails</a>
</body>
</html>

----085975331286927700--

From [email protected] Tue Mar 2 06:51:33 2004 -0800
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Tue, 2 Mar 2004 06:51:33 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i22EpTG6000543;
Tue, 2 Mar 2004 06:51:29 -0800
Received: from dhcp-43-37.thefields.com (dhcp-43-37.thefields.com [12.2.43.37])
by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with SMTP id i22EojCG024571;
Tue, 2 Mar 2004 06:50:46 -0800
Received: from [207.223.36.140]
by dhcp-43-37.thefields.com SMTP id ckO6L0CzpvgYF1;
Tue, 02 Mar 2004 14:48:50 +0000
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
From: "Matilda Greer" <[email protected]>
Reply-To: "Matilda Greer" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>,
<[email protected]>, <[email protected]>,
<[email protected]>, <[email protected]>,
<[email protected]>, <[email protected]>
Subject: IGDC up 400% now LETH on the move g
Date: Tue, 02 Mar 04 14:48:50 GMT
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="F__B1.EDA0BEA3B"
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XXXXXXXXXX, Probability=100%, Report='DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K 4.500, FORGED_MUA_IMS 3.226, X_NJABL_OPEN_PROXY 3, NOT_ADVISOR 2.900, SUSPICIOUS_RECIPS 2.799, URGENT_BIZ 1.799, MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME 1.110, MISSING_MIMEOLE 1.103, US_DOLLARS_2 0.001, __CTYPE_MULTIPART_ALT 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CT 0, __CTYPE_HAS_BOUNDARY 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART 0, __HAS_X_PRIORITY 0, __HAS_MSMAIL_PRI 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, MICRO_CAP_WARNING 0.000, __ANY_IMS_MUA 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, RCVD_IN_NJABL_ORG 0, EXCHANGE_SERVER 0, __HAS_X_MAILER 0, __IMS_MUA 0, MIME_TEXT_ONLY_MULTI 0, __MIME_VERSION 0'

--F__B1.EDA0BEA3B
Content-Type: text/plain;
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Wall Street Financial Times Newsletter

Specializing in Undervalued Small Cap Stocks for Immediate Breakout

We have the #1 track record for our picks in 2004:

GETC at .12 Currently .50 High .68 UP 467%
TLPE at 1.12 Currently 3.35 High 4.40 UP 293%
SWYC at .18 Currently .71 High .81 UP 350%
DNYY at .47 Currently 1.42 High 1.85 UP 294%

Immediate Investor Recommendation
Our Hottest Sales and Earnings Play
Projected to Triple in 7 Days:

Life Energy and Technology Holdings, Inc.
(OTCBB: LETH)

Price--- 1.35

Sales Orders Received '03--- over $150 Million +300% growth vs. '02
Est. Sales Growth '04--- +165%
Results from latest 10-Q:
Total Assets--- 36.8 million vs. 16.8 million
Cash--- 23.4 million vs. deficit
Shareholders Equity--- 12.0 million vs. 2.2 million
Shares Outstanding--- 29 mill
Est. Shares in Float--- 7 mill
Proj. Value Per Share--- 3.25 -- 3.50
Rating--- Urgent Buy

LETH is thriving as an emerging world leader in the conversion of waste
materials into electrical energy by utilizing their Biosphere Process Syst=
em,
making them the hottest undervalued stock at this price level where shares=

are ready to explode on huge investor attention.

Sales have rocketed beyond all estimates for LETH with no signs of
slowing. The numbers continue to stack-up as sales orders for the Biospher=
e
exceed $150 Million over the past year while the stock price doesn't yet
reflect the appearance of these impressive figures on an upcoming balance =

sheet. We are not the first to uncover this phenomenon as the stock is und=
er
accumulation, but we are acting aggressively on this recently filed data.

The unique proprietary technology of the Biosphere fills an urgent
worldwide need for cost-effective renewable energy sources and a
corresponding universal need to solve critical problems in the disposal of=

waste. The Biosphere System provides the highest level of innovative
technology while securing worldwide acceptance for a revolutionary product=

designed to significantly impact the global waste problem while
simultaneously generating electricity.

The Biosphere System enables LETH to draw revenue from the disposal of
various types of waste at 5 to 7 tons per hour including such materials as=
:
Municipal Solid Waste, refinery wastes, agricultural surpluses or effluent=
s,
medical waste, industrial waste, shale oil, sour natural gas, and the huge=

market of used tires are all converted in the Biosphere Process. LETH also=

profits from the sale of electricity created from the waste conversion on =
a
continuous basis by generating 5 to 10 mega-watts per hour of electricity =

which is then sold to replenish the local or national grid.

LETH is an alliance partner with Tetra Tech, Inc. (NASDAQ: TTEK, $20) a
leader and one of the largest providers in environmental, mechanical, and =

electrical management consulting services primarily for the US Government =

with annual sales of $800 Million. Tetra Tech will coordinate permitting, =

installation and continuous worldwide monitoring of the Biosphere Process =

System for LETH. Tetra Tech is now in the process of obtaining Department =

of Environmental Quality permitting for the Biosphere Process in the state=
of
Louisiana. This is a monumental event for LETH which opens the
floodgates for major project revenues in Louisiana while having a parallel=

effect on LETH stock in the form of a huge near-term announcement.

LETH has begun to catch the profit-making attention of investors by
embracing a major foothold on the global waste problem while a major push =

for generating electricity from alternative sources continues to be the ho=
t
topic due to shortages and massive power failures. LETH contains all the
ingredients for major profits as global demand to solve two crisis areas, =

waste and electrical energy, reaches unprecedented levels. We view this
perfectly timed convergence of events as the catalyst for additional contr=
acts
that will perpetuate the shattering of the Company's own sales records. We=

are seeing substantial gains for early investors in a ground floor opportu=
nity
that carries our highest rating for short-term trading profits.

Required LETH information: Certain statements contained in this newsletter=

may be forward looking statements within the meaning of The Private
Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such terms as "expect", "believe=
",
"may", "will", and "intend" or similar terms may identify these statements=

We are not a registered investment advisor or a broker dealer. This is not=
an
offer to buy or sell securities. No recommendation that the securities of =
the
companies profiled should be purchased, sold or held by individuals or
entities that learn of the profiled companies. This is an independent
electronic publication that was paid five thousand dollars by an unaffilia=
ted
third party for the preparation of this company information. Be advised th=
at
investments in companies profiled are considered to be high-risk and use o=
f
the content provided is for information purposes only. If anyone decides t=
o
act as an investor they are advised not to invest without the proper guida=
nce
from a financial advisor or a registered financial broker. If any party de=
cides
to participate as an investor then it will be that investor's sole risk. B=
e
advised that the purchase of such high-risk securities may result in the l=
oss
of some or all of the investment. Investors should not rely solely on the =

information presented. Rather, investors should use the information provid=
ed
in this newsletter as a starting point for doing additional independent
research on the profiled companies in order to allow the investor to form =

their own opinion regarding investing in the profiled companies. Factual
statements made about the profiled companies are made as of the date state=
d
and are subject to change without notice. Investing in micro-cap securitie=
s is
highly speculative and carries an extremely high degree of risk. All
information provided about the profiled companies may include information =

provided by outside sources, such as research reports, public filings, and=

information provided by management of the profiled company.

jaqbwkuczyshttms
nemm doznu
hlt

--F__B1.EDA0BEA3B--

From [email protected] Tue Mar 2 09:52:30 2004 -0800
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Tue, 2 Mar 2004 09:52:30 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i22HqUiJ008421
for <[email protected]>; Tue, 2 Mar 2004 09:52:30 -0800
Received: from 2911.net ([218.6.13.78])
by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with SMTP id i22HqRmG013131
for <[email protected]>; Tue, 2 Mar 2004 09:52:28 -0800
Message-Id: <[email protected]>
From: "Jon" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Subject: Dedicated Server & Hosting Solution
Sender: "Jon" <[email protected]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/html; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2004 13:52:28 +0800
Reply-To: "Jon" <[email protected]>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XXXXXXXXXX, Probability=100%, Report='URI_CLASS_INTERNET_DOMAIN 5, GUARANTEED_100_PERCENT 4.400, MAILTO_SUBJ_REMOVE 1.911, BANG_GUARANTEE 1.455, HTML_COMMENT_SAVED_URL 1.348, OFFERS_ETC 1.177, BULK_EMAIL 1.030, CTYPE_JUST_HTML 0.848, FRONTPAGE 0.541, SUBJ_REMOVE 0.288, EXCUSE_19 0.276, NO_FEE 0.133, CLICK_HERE_LINK 0.131, HTML_50_70 0.092, CLICK_BELOW 0.089, MAILTO_WITH_SUBJ 0.048, MAILTO_TO_REMOVE 0.001, EMAIL_MARKETING 0.001, TARGETED 0.001, MAILTO_LINK 0.001, __UNUSABLE_MSGID 0, __CTE 0, __CTYPE_IS_HTML 0, __CLICK_BELOW 0, __CLICK_HERE_LINK 0, __CTYPE_HTML 0, __CT 0, __TAG_EXISTS_BODY 0, __MIME_HTML_ONLY 0, __TAG_EXISTS_META 0, __MIME_HTML 0, __TAG_EXISTS_HTML 0, __TAG_EXISTS_HEAD 0, __RATWARE_SIGNATURE_3_N1 0, __CTYPE_CHARSET_QUOTED 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0'



<html>

<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Language" content="en-us">
<meta name="GENERATOR" content="Microsoft FrontPage 4.0">
<meta name="ProgId" content="FrontPage.Editor.Document">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<title>We offer reliable bulk email friendly web hosting services</title>
</head>

<body>

We offer reliable bulk email friendly web hosting
services. You can now have the 
peace of mind knowing that your web site is secure during your email marketing
 
campaigns. 
 
BulletProof Web Hosting 100% Guaranteed! We guarantee that your site will be
 
99% uptime. 
 
We also offer BulletProof dedicated server:
<div align="left">
<table border="1" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" style="border-collapse: collapse" bordercolor="#111111" width="458" height="23">
<tr>
<td width="149" height="118">Two IPs 
512MB RAM DDR 
P4 2.66GHZ CPU 
36 GB SCSI 
Unlimited Data Transfer 
Linux/Windows/FreeBSD 
 </td>
<td width="149" height="118">Three IPs 
1024MB RAM DDR 
P4 / Two CPU 
72 GB SCSI 
Unlimited Data Transfer 
Linux/Windows/FreeBSD 
 </td>
<td width="150" height="118"> Dynamic IP 
1024MB RAM DDR 
P4 / Two CPU 
72 GB SCSI 
Unlimited Data Transfer 
Linux/Windows/FreeBSD 
 </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="149" height="38">Price: No setup
fee 
          US$ 599.00/month</td>
<td width="149" height="38">Price: No setup
fee 
          US$ 799.00/month</td>
<td width="150" height="38">Price: No setup
fee 
          US$ 999.00/month</td>
</tr>
</table>
</div>

                                                                                    
<a href="http://web.hosting-corp.com/hosting.htm">More information</a>


 
Allowed Usage 
You can use the server for any of the following: 
 
Direct Bulk Mailing or Proxy Mailing 
Web Site Hosting 
Proxy, Relay or Port Scanning 
 
We can supply Targeted Email Addresses according to your requirements, and 
send out Targeted Emails for you. For more information, please contact us
by  
<a href="mailto:[email protected];[email protected]">[email protected]
or [email protected]</a> 
 
It will be our pleasure to do business with you. 
 
 
Cheers! 
 
Mike Tanaka 
Support Team 
 
**************************************************************************************** 
Receiving this e-mail because you registered to receive offers from us. 
Please click here to unscbscirbe:<a href="mailto:[email protected]?subject=Remove">[email protected]?subject=Remove</a> 
****************************************************************************************

</body>

</html>

From [email protected] Wed Mar 3 09:41:58 2004 -0800
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Wed, 3 Mar 2004 09:41:58 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i23HfsOI005779;
Wed, 3 Mar 2004 09:41:55 -0800
Received: from chello062178229161.15.15.vie.surfer.at (chello062178229161.15.15.vie.surfer.at [62.178.229.161])
by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with SMTP id i23HfCjO010207;
Wed, 3 Mar 2004 09:41:16 -0800
Received: from 235.36.75.109 by 62.178.229.161; Wed, 03 Mar 2004 14:40:01 -0300
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
From: "Milton Crowder" <[email protected]>
Reply-To: "Milton Crowder" <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Subject: employers don't hire people without degrees, buy yours today
Date: Wed, 03 Mar 2004 21:40:01 +0400
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="--734535703533881"
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XXXXXXXXXIIIIIIIII, Probability=99%, Report='MIME_HTML_ONLY_MULTI 4.500, X_NJABL_OPEN_PROXY 3, FORGED_MUA_EUDORA 2.722, OBFUSCATING_BANG_COMMENTS 2.184, MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME 1.110, MISSING_MIMEOLE 1.103, HTML_70_90 0.572, BIG_FONT 0.146, LINES_OF_YELLING 0.001, __HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __HAS_X_MAILER 0, __EUDORA_MUA 0, __ANY_QUALCOMM_MUA 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __TAG_EXISTS_BODY 0, __MIME_HTML_ONLY 0, __TAG_EXISTS_META 0, __MIME_HTML 0, __TAG_EXISTS_HTML 0, __TAG_EXISTS_HEAD 0, __HAS_MSMAIL_PRI 0, __HAS_X_PRIORITY 0, HTML_TAG_UNKNOWN 0.000, RCVD_IN_NJABL_ORG 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART 0, __CTYPE_HAS_BOUNDARY 0, __CT 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART_ALT 0'

----734535703533881
Content-Type: text/html;
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">

<HTML><HEAD><TITLE>GET</TITLE>
<META http-equiv=3DContent-Language content=3Den-us>
<META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2737.800" name=3DGENERATOR>

<META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; charset=3Dwindows-12=
52">
<STYLE>DIV.Section1 {
page: Section1
}
</STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY>
<CENTER>
<TABLE borderColor=3D#049dd0 cellSpacing=3D0 cellPadding=3D7 width=3D500 b=
gColor=3D#ffffff
border=3D1>
<TBODY>
<TR>
<TD vAlign=3Dtop align=3Dleft width=3D500>
<CENTER>
GET<!k> Y<!r>OU<!d>R <!u>UN<!y>I<!b>VE<!j>R<!m=
>S<!n>I<!q>T<!y>Y<!c>
D<!v>I<!c>P<!l>L<!b>O<!t>MA <!p><!p>D<!k>o<!r> <!n>yo<!p>=
u<!m> <!n>wan<!n>t<!s> <!u>a<!r> <!l>pr<!d>os<!h>p<!j>e<!x>r<!q>o<!w>u<!g>=
s<!e>
fut<!t>ure,<!m> in<!c>cr<!k>ea<!x>s<!z>e<!o>d<!i> <!n>e<!x>a<!u>rn<!=
l>ing<!g> p<!d>ow<!z>e<!m>r<!l> <!y><!x>m<!t>or<!y>e<!f> m<!z>on<!n>e<!=
u>y
an<!w>d<!j> <!z>th<!r>e respec<!b>t<!w> <!e>of a<!x>l<!l>l? <!c>Ca<=
!b>ll <!i>t<!s>hi<!g>s<!b> <!c>numbe<!i>r<!q>:<!u>  

1-720-834-2989 

<!f>(24<!p>
h<!f>ou<!k>rs<!k>)  <OI></CENTER>
<LI>T<!r>he<!d>re<!u> a<!y>r<!b>e <!j>n<!m>o<!n>
<!q>r<!y>e<!c>qu<!v>i<!c>r<!l>e<!b>d<!t> tes<!p>t<!p>s<!k>,<!r>
<!n>cl<!p>a<!m>s<!n>ses<!n>,<!s> <!u>b<!r>o<!l>ok<!d>s,<!h> <!j>o<!x>r<!q>=

<!w>i<!g>n<!e>terv<!t>iews<!m>!  
<LI>Ge<!c>t <!k>a <!x>B<!z>a<!o>c<!i>h<!n>e<!x>l<!u>or<!l>s, <!g>Ma<=
!d>st<!z>e<!m>r<!l>s<!y>,<!x> <!t>MB<!y>A<!f>, <!z>an<!n>d<!u> Doc<!w>t<!j=
>o<!z>ra<!r>te (PhD)<!b> <!w>d<!e>iplo<!x>m<!l>a!  
<LI>R<!c>ece<!b>ive<!i> <!s>th<!g>e<!b> <!c>benef<!i>i<!q>t<!u>s a<!=
o>n<!f>d <!s>ad<!v>m<!t>ir<!o>a<!q>tion<!f> th<!p>at<!f> c<!k>om<!k>es<!r>=
w<!d>it<!u>h <!y>a<!b> d<!j>i<!m>p<!n>l<!q>o<!y>m<!c>a!<!v>  
<LI>N<!c>o<!l> <!b>o<!t>ne i<!p>s<!p> <!k>t<!r>u<!n>rn<!p>e<!m>d<!n>=
do<!n>w<!s>n<!u>!<!r>  
<CENTER><!l>
C<!d>al<!h>l<!j> <!x>T<!q>o<!w>d<!g>a<!e>y <!z>=

1-720-834-2989

 <!o>(<!i>7<!n> <!x>d<!u>ay<!l>s a<!g> w<!d>ee<!z>k<!m>)<!l>=
<!y><!x> C<!t>on<!y>f<!f>id<!z>en<!n>t<!u>iali<!w>t<!j>y<!z> a<=
!r>ssured!  
W=
e are located in USA  international=
callers
are very
welcome</CENTER></OI></LI></TD></TR></TBODY></TAB=
LE></CENTER></BODY></HTML>

----734535703533881--

From [email protected] Wed Mar 3 12:58:32 2004 -0800
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Wed, 3 Mar 2004 12:58:32 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i23KwWg8017704;
Wed, 3 Mar 2004 12:58:32 -0800
Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100])
by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i23KviJL022638
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO);
Wed, 3 Mar 2004 12:57:45 -0800
Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13])
by list3.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with SMTP id i23KvO15015648;
Wed, 3 Mar 2004 12:57:25 -0800
Received: from mxu2.u.washington.edu (mxu2.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.7])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i23KuPIb013810
for <[email protected]>; Wed, 3 Mar 2004 12:56:25 -0800
Received: from rwcrmhc11.comcast.net (rwcrmhc11.comcast.net [204.127.198.35])
by mxu2.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i23KuORr007215
for <[email protected]>; Wed, 3 Mar 2004 12:56:24 -0800
Received: from inigo (bgp997860bgs.nanarb01.mi.comcast.net[68.40.59.71])
by comcast.net (rwcrmhc11) with SMTP
id <20040303205624013007jk8me>; Wed, 3 Mar 2004 20:56:24 +0000
Message-Id: <Pine.WNT.4.58.0403031549470.2240@INIGO>
Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2004 15:56:57 -0500 (Eastern Standard Time)
Sender: [email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
From: Rick Carter <[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
Subject: PC-pine / pine dual-boot?
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
X-X-Sender: [email protected]
X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0'
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN

Hi all,

I've been searching the archives, and aside from someone in 2001 saying it
wasn't working for them, I was wondering if anyone's been able to do what
I want to do:

My PC is dual-boot -- Windows 2000 (probably soon to be Windows XP
Professional) and RedHat Linux 9. I'm currently just getting my mail on
the Windows side with PC-Pine from a POP3 server. The mailboxes and
pinerc are on a FAT32 partition (drive F:) which I mount as /F on the
Linux side.

I need to be on each side of this system relatively equally, and ideally
would love to use pine and pc-pine to hit the same mailboxes.

Last I knew (doing some experiments back when I was reading pine on a Sun
and put PC-pine on my home Windows box), the end-of-line difference
between Windows and unix/Linux made this not work properly, but I'm
surprised not to see lots of requests for getting this to work somehow.

So, can any/all of the following be done (easily, or with workarounds):

- Read the mailboxes on both sides without one side of this causing
corruption? (vital)

- Get my pop3 mail to my INBOX, and send mail from either side (vital)

- Read the .pinerc and appropriately apply/ignore options (not as vital --
I can just remember to update one with any changes in, say filtering
rules, or write a perl script or something to do it).

If I can get this working, my last major dual-boot unhappiness will be
solved. :)

Thanks,

- Rick
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------
For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see:
http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/
-----------------------------------------------------------------

From [email protected] Wed Mar 3 13:13:38 2004 -0800
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Wed, 3 Mar 2004 13:13:37 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i23LDa9c018572;
Wed, 3 Mar 2004 13:13:36 -0800
Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100])
by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i23LDVKM006670
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO);
Wed, 3 Mar 2004 13:13:31 -0800
Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13])
by list3.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with SMTP id i23LDL8k004950;
Wed, 3 Mar 2004 13:13:21 -0800
Received: from mxu3.u.washington.edu (mxu3.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.133])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i23LClNU018408
for <[email protected]>; Wed, 3 Mar 2004 13:12:48 -0800
Received: from mail-out4.apple.com (mail-out4.apple.com [17.254.13.23])
by mxu3.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i23LCkcB006630
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO)
for <[email protected]>; Wed, 3 Mar 2004 13:12:47 -0800
Received: from mailgate1.apple.com (a17-128-100-225.apple.com [17.128.100.225])
by mail-out4.apple.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i23LEFe1001339
for <[email protected]>; Wed, 3 Mar 2004 13:14:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from relay3.apple.com (relay3.apple.com) by mailgate1.apple.com
(Content Technologies SMTPRS 4.3.6) with ESMTP id
<[email protected]> for
<[email protected]>; Wed, 3 Mar 2004 13:12:46 -0800
Received: from ackema.apple.com (ackema.apple.com [17.202.14.80]) by
relay3.apple.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i23LCikf021115
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NOT) for
<[email protected]>; Wed, 3 Mar 2004 21:12:45 GMT
Message-Id: <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2004 13:12:43 -0800 (PST)
Sender: [email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
From: Matt Ackeret <[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: PC-pine / pine dual-boot?
In-Reply-To: <Pine.WNT.4.58.0403031549470.2240@INIGO>
References: <Pine.WNT.4.58.0403031549470.2240@INIGO>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XXIIIII, Probability=25%, Report='RATWARE_RCVD_BONUS_SPC 2.799, __HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CTYPE_CHARSET_QUOTED 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0'
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN

On Wed, 3 Mar 2004, Rick Carter wrote:
>So, can any/all of the following be done (easily, or with workarounds):
>
>- Read the mailboxes on both sides without one side of this causing
>corruption? (vital)
>
>- Get my pop3 mail to my INBOX, and send mail from either side (vital)

Why don't you just use IMAP? I _think_ that will solve part of your
problems, since the mail will just be on the server, and it doesn't matter
where you access it from.. you can even access it from multiple clients
simultaneously, which you can't do with POP.

From [email protected] Wed Mar 3 17:20:05 2004 -0800
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Wed, 3 Mar 2004 17:20:05 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i241K4kD001847;
Wed, 3 Mar 2004 17:20:04 -0800
Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100])
by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i241K2eX006050
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO);
Wed, 3 Mar 2004 17:20:03 -0800
Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13])
by list3.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with SMTP id i241JrB9013680;
Wed, 3 Mar 2004 17:19:53 -0800
Received: from mxu1.u.washington.edu (mxu1.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.132])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i241JCaK098658
for <[email protected]>; Wed, 3 Mar 2004 17:19:12 -0800
Received: from JMWANG (dns1.tsmc.com.tw [203.66.245.201])
by mxu1.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with SMTP id i241J9iC031446
for <[email protected]>; Wed, 3 Mar 2004 17:19:10 -0800
Message-Id: <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 04 Mar 2004 09:19:09 +0800
Sender: [email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
From: [email protected]
To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
Subject: ello! =))
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed;
boundary="--------vndiivonvclvltygxcoc"
X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, NO_REAL_NAME 0.000, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT 0, __CTYPE_HAS_BOUNDARY 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0'
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN

----------vndiivonvclvltygxcoc
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

I don't bite, weah!

archive password: 10025

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
+ -- Warning text added to this message by -- +
+ -- University of Washington Computing & Communications -- +
+ -- [email protected] -- +
+ +
+ ATTACHMENTS DELETED +
+ +
+ One or more attachments have been deleted from this message +
+ by UW C&C because they are of a file type currently being +
+ used by attackers to try to get viruses onto UW computers. +
+ +
+ o If the sender of the message is known to you, and you were +
+ expecting the attachments, you will need to make arrangements +
+ with the sender to receive the attachments by other means or +
+ wait until the block on these file types has been dropped. +
+ +
+ o If the sender is not known to you, it is possible that this +
+ is actually generated by a virus and you may safely delete and +
+ ignore this message. +
+ +
+ o If this message looks like an official message from some +
+ UW organization and instructs you to open the attachment +
+ to get important information, it is likely to be a fake. +
+ Virus writers are increasingly using this technique (called +
+ "social engineering") to mislead people into doing what they +
+ want. +
+ +
+ C&C never sends attachments with information messages about +
+ your account, password, or security issues. Instead, you will +
+ be directed to a Web page on a C&C site. +
+ +
+ Further information may be found on the Major Computing and +
+ Network Outages page at +
+ http://www.washington.edu/computing/outages/ +
+ C&C will also post any updates to the Outages page as events +
+ occur. +
+ +
+ Please contact help@cac or your local computing support team +
+ if you have further questions. +
+ +
+ -- Warning text added to this message by -- +
+ -- University of Washington Computing & Communications -- +
+ -- [email protected] -- +
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

----------vndiivonvclvltygxcoc--
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------
For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see:
http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/
-----------------------------------------------------------------

From [email protected] Wed Mar 3 22:49:42 2004 -0800
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Wed, 3 Mar 2004 22:49:42 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i246newb013222;
Wed, 3 Mar 2004 22:49:40 -0800
Received: from list1.u.washington.edu (list1.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.99])
by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i246ncSg017043
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO);
Wed, 3 Mar 2004 22:49:39 -0800
Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13])
by list1.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with SMTP id i246nQ7v011984;
Wed, 3 Mar 2004 22:49:26 -0800
Received: from mxu4.u.washington.edu (mxu4.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.8])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i246mdZZ049182
for <[email protected]>; Wed, 3 Mar 2004 22:48:39 -0800
Received: from mail1.dpi.ru ([213.243.83.101])
by mxu4.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i246mZlC028799
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO)
for <[email protected]>; Wed, 3 Mar 2004 22:48:38 -0800
Received: from otoro (zzz071.internal.dpi.ru [192.168.90.71])
by mail1.dpi.ru (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i246mRC6002319
for <[email protected]>; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 09:48:27 +0300 (MSK)
(envelope-from [email protected])
Message-Id: <Pine.CYG.4.58.0403040944590.1520@bgbeb>
Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2004 09:48:19 +0300
Sender: [email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
From: Victor Stepanov <[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
Subject: pine 4.58 cygwin 1.5 port
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-103.1 required=3.5 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,
USER_IN_WHITELIST autolearn=ham version=2.60
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on
mail1.dpi.ru
X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0'
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN

Hello,

Any news on port of version 4.58 to Cygwin 1.5? Can we expect the same
difficulties with newer versions of Pine?

Thank you

Victor
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------
For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see:
http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/
-----------------------------------------------------------------

From [email protected] Wed Mar 3 22:56:21 2004 -0800
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Wed, 3 Mar 2004 22:56:21 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i246uLBF013446;
Wed, 3 Mar 2004 22:56:21 -0800
Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100])
by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i246uIi4032731
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO);
Wed, 3 Mar 2004 22:56:19 -0800
Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13])
by list3.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with SMTP id i246uA0J013404;
Wed, 3 Mar 2004 22:56:10 -0800
Received: from mxu6.u.washington.edu (mxu6.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.12])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i246ttws028928
for <[email protected]>; Wed, 3 Mar 2004 22:55:55 -0800
Received: from euler.math.washington.edu (euler.math.washington.edu [128.95.224.1])
by mxu6.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i246tskR006440
for <[email protected]>; Wed, 3 Mar 2004 22:55:55 -0800
Received: from zeno2.math.washington.edu (IDENT:[email protected] [128.95.224.5])
by euler.math.washington.edu (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i246sQrG014185;
Wed, 3 Mar 2004 22:54:26 -0800
Message-Id: <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2004 22:54:26 -0800 (PST)
Sender: [email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
From: Eduardo Chappa <[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: pine 4.58 cygwin 1.5 port
In-Reply-To: <Pine.CYG.4.58.0403040944590.1520@bgbeb>
References: <Pine.CYG.4.58.0403040944590.1520@bgbeb>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-To: Victor Stepanov <[email protected]>
X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
X-AntiVirus: checked by Vexira Milter 1.0.6; VAE 6.24.0.6; VDF 6.24.0.37
X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0'
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN

*** Victor Stepanov ([email protected]) wrote in the pine-info list on...:

:) Any news on port of version 4.58 to Cygwin 1.5? Can we expect the same
:) difficulties with newer versions of Pine?

What do you mean? Is the port not working for you? Did you download it
through the setup program or did you build your own?

Eduardo
http://www.math.washington.edu/~chappa/pine/

From [email protected] Wed Mar 3 23:58:31 2004 -0800
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Wed, 3 Mar 2004 23:58:31 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i247wUee015979
for <[email protected]>; Wed, 3 Mar 2004 23:58:30 -0800
Received: from localhst1545.com (80.179.107.222.forward.012.net.il [80.179.107.222])
by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with SMTP id i247vwns019346
for <[email protected]>; Wed, 3 Mar 2004 23:58:13 -0800
Message-Id: <[email protected]>
From: "MR MOHAMMED ABACHA" <[email protected]>
Reply-To: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2004 08:46:48 +0100
Subject: RE:LETTER OF INTENT
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6900 DM
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XXXXXXXXXIIIIIII, Probability=97%, Report='RATWARE_RE 4.400, RATWARE_OE_MALFORMED 2.900, URGENT_BIZ 1.799, NIGERIAN_BODY2 1.442, NIGERIAN_BODY1 1.296, US_DOLLARS_2 0.001, SUBJ_ALL_CAPS 0.001, __HAS_OUTLOOK_IN_MAILER 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CTYPE_CHARSET_QUOTED 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, __CTE 0, __UNUSABLE_MSGID 0, __NIGERIAN_BODY_34 0, __NIGERIAN_BODY_44 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __OUTLOOK_MUA 0, __NIGERIAN_BODY_9 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __HAS_X_MAILER 0, __ANY_OUTLOOK_MUA 0'

Mr=2E Mohammed Abacha=2E
http=3A=2F=2Fnews=2Ebbc=2Eco=2Euk=2F1=2Fhi=2Fworld=2Fafrica=2F468903=2Estm
DEAR FRIEND=2C

I am Mohammed Abacha=2C the eldest son of the late
president of Nigeria=2C General Sani Abacha=2E I was
falsely accused of murder
and as such was imprisoned=2C but thanks to God=2C I have
been released
for my innocence=2E Well dear friend I need your
assistance in transferring
some of my money into your account=2C because the
government is making plans
to seize them=2C as they did to my fathers own=2EPlease
view this site and read
it's content carefully=2C
http=3A=2F=2Fnews=2Ebbc=2Eco=2Euk=2F1=2Fhi=2Fworld=2Fafrica=2F468903=2Estm
the amount is $25million in a Security Abroad=2E All
that is needed is for me to
instruct the company to transfer the funds to your
account=2C I will
remunerate you with 30% of the total funds transferred
to your vital bank account as compensation for your
assistance=2C To indicate your interest=2C contact my
lawyer urgently and confidentially for more
information and the roles you will play in this
business=2E All the legal information concerning this
Money will be sent to you as soon as we agree
together=2E So I will get my private attorney to get you
the needed information=2E If this proposal satisfies
you=2C please contact my lawyer immediately
with your full names=2C telephone and fax numbers to
enable my lawyer to
contact you=2E He shall handle this transaction from
beginning to the end on my behalf =2EContact him on his
e=2Email=28barristerkumo=40ziplip=2Ecom=29

Looking forward to doing business with you=2E

Thanks for your cooperation=2E

Best Regard=2E

Mohammed Abacha=2E

From [email protected] Thu Mar 4 00:00:50 2004 -0800
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 00:00:50 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i2480jSZ016106;
Thu, 4 Mar 2004 00:00:45 -0800
Received: from ip-wv-68-117-162-121.charterwv.net (ip-wv-68-117-162-121.charterwv.net [68.117.162.121])
by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with SMTP id i2480CgH019428;
Thu, 4 Mar 2004 00:00:19 -0800
Received: from [146.62.207.63] by ip-wv-68-117-162-121.charterwv.net id 9D0ptf85R1F7; Thu, 04 Mar 2004 04:52:35 -0500
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
From: "Brock Cho" <[email protected]>
Reply-To: "Brock Cho" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>,
<[email protected]>,
<[email protected]>, <[email protected]>,
<[email protected]>, <[email protected]>,
<[email protected]>, <[email protected]>,
<[email protected]>, <[email protected]>,
<[email protected]>, <[email protected]>
Subject: This stock is destined to achieve higher levels ppvk nvr
Date: Thu, 04 Mar 04 04:52:35 GMT
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2627
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="_F_297.9.21EB"
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XXXXXXXXXIIIIIIII, Probability=98%, Report='DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K 4.500, X_NJABL_OPEN_PROXY 3, NOT_ADVISOR 2.900, URGENT_BIZ 1.799, MISSING_MIMEOLE 1.103, US_DOLLARS_2 0.001, __ANY_OUTLOOK_MUA 0, __HAS_OUTLOOK_IN_MAILER 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART_ALT 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CT 0, __CTYPE_HAS_BOUNDARY 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART 0, __HAS_X_PRIORITY 0, __HAS_MSMAIL_PRI 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, MICRO_CAP_WARNING 0.000, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, RCVD_IN_NJABL_ORG 0, __OUTLOOK_MUA 0, FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK 0.000, __HAS_X_MAILER 0, MIME_TEXT_ONLY_MULTI 0'

--_F_297.9.21EB
Content-Type: text/plain;
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Wall Street Financial Times Newsletter

Specializing in Undervalued Small Cap Stocks for Immediate Breakout

We have the #1 track record for our picks in 2004:

GETC at .12 Currently .50 High .68 UP 467%
TLPE at 1.12 Currently 3.35 High 4.40 UP 293%
SWYC at .18 Currently .71 High .81 UP 350%
DNYY at .47 Currently 1.42 High 1.85 UP 294%

Immediate Investor Recommendation
Our Hottest Sales and Earnings Play
Projected to Triple in 7 Days:

Life Energy and Technology Holdings, Inc.
(OTCBB: LETH)

Price--- 1.50

Sales Orders Received '03--- over $150 Million +300% growth vs. '02
Est. Sales Growth '04--- +165%
Results from latest 10-Q:
Total Assets--- 36.8 million vs. 16.8 million
Cash--- 23.4 million vs. deficit
Shareholders Equity--- 12.0 million vs. 2.2 million
Shares Outstanding--- 29 mill
Est. Shares in Float--- 7 mill
Proj. Value Per Share--- 3.25 -- 3.50
Rating--- Urgent Buy

LETH is thriving as an emerging world leader in the conversion of waste
materials into electrical energy by utilizing their Biosphere Process Syst=
em,
making them the hottest undervalued stock at this price level where shares=

are ready to explode on huge investor attention.

Sales have rocketed beyond all estimates for LETH with no signs of
slowing. The numbers continue to stack-up as sales orders for the Biospher=
e
exceed $150 Million over the past year while the stock price doesn't yet
reflect the appearance of these impressive figures on an upcoming balance =

sheet. We are not the first to uncover this phenomenon as the stock is und=
er
accumulation, but we are acting aggressively on this recently filed data.

The unique proprietary technology of the Biosphere fills an urgent
worldwide need for cost-effective renewable energy sources and a
corresponding universal need to solve critical problems in the disposal of=

waste. The Biosphere System provides the highest level of innovative
technology while securing worldwide acceptance for a revolutionary product=

designed to significantly impact the global waste problem while
simultaneously generating electricity.

The Biosphere System enables LETH to draw revenue from the disposal of
various types of waste at 5 to 7 tons per hour including such materials as=
:
Municipal Solid Waste, refinery wastes, agricultural surpluses or effluent=
s,
medical waste, industrial waste, shale oil, sour natural gas, and the huge=

market of used tires are all converted in the Biosphere Process. LETH also=

profits from the sale of electricity created from the waste conversion on =
a
continuous basis by generating 5 to 10 mega-watts per hour of electricity =

which is then sold to replenish the local or national grid.

LETH is an alliance partner with Tetra Tech, Inc. (NASDAQ: TTEK, $20) a
leader and one of the largest providers in environmental, mechanical, and =

electrical management consulting services primarily for the US Government =

with annual sales of $800 Million. Tetra Tech will coordinate permitting, =

installation and continuous worldwide monitoring of the Biosphere Process =

System for LETH. Tetra Tech is now in the process of obtaining Department =

of Environmental Quality permitting for the Biosphere Process in the state=
of
Louisiana. This is a monumental event for LETH which opens the
floodgates for major project revenues in Louisiana while having a parallel=

effect on LETH stock in the form of a huge near-term announcement.

LETH has begun to catch the profit-making attention of investors by
embracing a major foothold on the global waste problem while a major push =

for generating electricity from alternative sources continues to be the ho=
t
topic due to shortages and massive power failures. LETH contains all the
ingredients for major profits as global demand to solve two crisis areas, =

waste and electrical energy, reaches unprecedented levels. We view this
perfectly timed convergence of events as the catalyst for additional contr=
acts
that will perpetuate the shattering of the Company's own sales records. We=

are seeing substantial gains for early investors in a ground floor opportu=
nity
that carries our highest rating for short-term trading profits.

Required LETH information: Certain statements contained in this newsletter=

may be forward looking statements within the meaning of The Private
Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such terms as "expect", "believe=
",
"may", "will", and "intend" or similar terms may identify these statements=

We are not a registered investment advisor or a broker dealer. This is not=
an
offer to buy or sell securities. No recommendation that the securities of =
the
companies profiled should be purchased, sold or held by individuals or
entities that learn of the profiled companies. This is an independent
electronic publication that was paid five thousand dollars by an unaffilia=
ted
third party for the preparation of this company information. Be advised th=
at
investments in companies profiled are considered to be high-risk and use o=
f
the content provided is for information purposes only. If anyone decides t=
o
act as an investor they are advised not to invest without the proper guida=
nce
from a financial advisor or a registered financial broker. If any party de=
cides
to participate as an investor then it will be that investor's sole risk. B=
e
advised that the purchase of such high-risk securities may result in the l=
oss
of some or all of the investment. Investors should not rely solely on the =

information presented. Rather, investors should use the information provid=
ed
in this newsletter as a starting point for doing additional independent
research on the profiled companies in order to allow the investor to form =

their own opinion regarding investing in the profiled companies. Factual
statements made about the profiled companies are made as of the date state=
d
and are subject to change without notice. Investing in micro-cap securitie=
s is
highly speculative and carries an extremely high degree of risk. All
information provided about the profiled companies may include information =

provided by outside sources, such as research reports, public filings, and=

information provided by management of the profiled company.

qfuysdujcgfymqnpnonodvfyftvato dimznbsp

--_F_297.9.21EB--

From [email protected] Thu Mar 4 00:09:34 2004 -0800
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 00:09:34 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i2489Xwo016434;
Thu, 4 Mar 2004 00:09:33 -0800
Received: from list2.u.washington.edu (list2.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.165])
by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i2489Vbu002833
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO);
Thu, 4 Mar 2004 00:09:31 -0800
Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13])
by list2.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with SMTP id i2489Kli011424;
Thu, 4 Mar 2004 00:09:20 -0800
Received: from mxu2.u.washington.edu (mxu2.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.7])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i2480cw3018334
for <[email protected]>; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 00:00:38 -0800
Received: from sns-felb.debis.de (neptun.sns-felb.debis.de [53.122.101.2])
by mxu2.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with SMTP id i2480aHq016816
for <[email protected]>; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 00:00:36 -0800
Received: by sns-felb.debis.de; id JAA13967; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 09:01:31 +0100
Received: from unknown(53.113.82.10) by neptun.sns-felb.debis.de via smap (V5.0)
id xma013939; Thu, 4 Mar 04 09:01:25 +0100
Received: from mail1.c1.dsh.de (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by dshmail1.dsh.de (8.9.1/8.8.7) with ESMTP id JAA16398;
Thu, 4 Mar 2004 09:00:28 +0100 (MET)
Received: from chnb124.clients.win.c1.dsh.de (chnb124.clients.win.c1.dsh.de [172.19.32.88])
by mail1.c1.dsh.de (8.10.0/8.10.0) with ESMTP id i2480Rl08935;
Thu, 4 Mar 2004 09:00:27 +0100
Message-Id: <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2004 09:00:27 +0100 (=?iso-8859-1?Q?Westeurop=E4ische_Normalzeit?=)
Reply-To: Rico Barth <[email protected]>
Sender: [email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
From: Rico Barth <[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: PC-pine / pine dual-boot?
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
References: <Pine.WNT.4.58.0403031549470.2240@INIGO>
<[email protected]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-To: Matt Ackeret <[email protected]>
X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
X-X-Sender: [email protected]
X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XIIIIIIIII, Probability=19%, Report='WEIRD_PORT 2.099, __HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT 0, SIGNATURE_LONG_SPARSE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0'
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN

Hi!

On Wed, 3 Mar 2004, Matt Ackeret wrote:

> On Wed, 3 Mar 2004, Rick Carter wrote:
> >So, can any/all of the following be done (easily, or with workarounds):
> >
> >- Read the mailboxes on both sides without one side of this causing
> >corruption? (vital)
> >
> >- Get my pop3 mail to my INBOX, and send mail from either side (vital)
>
> Why don't you just use IMAP? I _think_ that will solve part of your
> problems, since the mail will just be on the server, and it doesn't matter
> where you access it from.. you can even access it from multiple clients
> simultaneously, which you can't do with POP.

IMAP will solve some problems, but if you need your boxes on a local
filesystem you could configure this in .pinerc.
You must set "sentmail", "savemail" and other used folders on Unix to
the path of your mounted Win partition.
Another way is to set an rsync at login/logout to sync your local boxes
between win and Unix. In this case you should convert your windows mail
folders to Unix line end.
Backup up your local folders before you do this. the folders could crash
sometimes on win.

Hope that helps

Bye Rico

--
Dipl.-Math. Rico Barth
T-Systems
Systems Integration
Berater BU Sachsen
Anschrift: Clausstrasse 3 , 09126 Chemnitz
Telefon: +49 ( 371) 5359 - 350
Telefax: +49 ( 371) 5359 - 133
Mobil: +49 ( 160) 94 82 15 82
E-Mail: [email protected]
Internet: http://www.t-systems.com

PGP-Key:
Fingerprint: 8A56 C021 6240 EAD5 AB42 EA2B 9B2E 1405 874C 8377
http://blackhole.pca.dfn.de:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x874C8377

From [email protected] Thu Mar 4 00:46:26 2004 -0800
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 00:46:26 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i248kPIG017474;
Thu, 4 Mar 2004 00:46:25 -0800
Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100])
by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i248kLl6020882
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO);
Thu, 4 Mar 2004 00:46:21 -0800
Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13])
by list3.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with SMTP id i248k2OW015138;
Thu, 4 Mar 2004 00:46:03 -0800
Received: from mxu5.u.washington.edu (mxu5.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.164])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i248j5GU075514
for <[email protected]>; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 00:45:05 -0800
Received: from sns-felb.debis.de (neptun.sns-felb.debis.de [53.122.101.2])
by mxu5.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with SMTP id i248j2Ge018907
for <[email protected]>; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 00:45:03 -0800
Received: by sns-felb.debis.de; id JAA26584; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 09:45:57 +0100
Received: from unknown(53.113.82.10) by neptun.sns-felb.debis.de via smap (V5.0)
id xma026530; Thu, 4 Mar 04 09:45:45 +0100
Received: from mail1.c1.dsh.de (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by dshmail1.dsh.de (8.9.1/8.8.7) with ESMTP id JAA28628
for <[email protected]>; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 09:44:48 +0100 (MET)
Received: from chnb124.clients.win.c1.dsh.de (chnb124.clients.win.c1.dsh.de [172.19.32.88])
by mail1.c1.dsh.de (8.10.0/8.10.0) with ESMTP id i248ill10894
for <[email protected]>; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 09:44:47 +0100
Message-Id: <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2004 09:44:47 +0100 (=?iso-8859-1?Q?Westeurop=E4ische_Normalzeit?=)
Reply-To: Rico Barth <[email protected]>
Sender: [email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
From: Rico Barth <[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: PC-pine / pine dual-boot?
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
References: <Pine.WNT.4.58.0403031549470.2240@INIGO>
<[email protected]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
X-X-Sender: [email protected]
X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XIIIIIIIII, Probability=19%, Report='WEIRD_PORT 2.099, __HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT 0, SIGNATURE_LONG_SPARSE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0'
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN

Hi Simon!

On Thu, 4 Mar 2004, Simon White wrote:

> 04-Mar-04 at 09:00, Rico Barth ([email protected]) wrote :
> > Another way is to set an rsync at login/logout to sync your local boxes
> > between win and Unix. In this case you should convert your windows mail
> > folders to Unix line end.
>
> How do you rsync between a system that is shutting down and another that
> hasn't booted yet?

the shutdown of operation systems says nothing about the reachability of
their filesystems. the data of mail folders is on a physical volume. after
Unix boot partition on harddrive which is used by Win could mount. in this
case you could say on login or in boot-scripts

rsync -av --delete ${PATH_to_mounted_win_drive}/${Mail Path}/ ~user/Mail/

and on logout or in halt-scripts in the other way.

> I managed to convert some Windows Pine folders to UNIX mboxes which then
> opened back up in Pine OK, but I don't remember the exact details. That
> might be a solution. IMAP would probably be better.

that's right, the reasons for central mail servers and folders are for
instance:

-central backup
-big volumes with enough space
-reachability from any point on the net

Bye

Rico

--
Dipl.-Math. Rico Barth
T-Systems
Systems Integration
Berater BU Sachsen
Anschrift: Clausstrasse 3 , 09126 Chemnitz
Telefon: +49 ( 371) 5359 - 350
Telefax: +49 ( 371) 5359 - 133
Mobil: +49 ( 160) 94 82 15 82
E-Mail: [email protected]
Internet: http://www.t-systems.com

PGP-Key:
Fingerprint: 8A56 C021 6240 EAD5 AB42 EA2B 9B2E 1405 874C 8377
http://blackhole.pca.dfn.de:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x874C8377

From [email protected] Thu Mar 4 00:56:29 2004 -0800
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 00:56:29 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i248uSH3017764;
Thu, 4 Mar 2004 00:56:28 -0800
Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100])
by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i248uQ8S004273
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO);
Thu, 4 Mar 2004 00:56:26 -0800
Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13])
by list3.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with SMTP id i248u7RX010854;
Thu, 4 Mar 2004 00:56:07 -0800
Received: from mxu2.u.washington.edu (mxu2.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.7])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i248tWN5057550
for <[email protected]>; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 00:55:32 -0800
Received: from smtp.mediadev.com (smtp.mediadev.com [81.57.73.118])
by mxu2.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i248tUru026240
for <[email protected]>; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 00:55:30 -0800
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by smtp.mediadev.com (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 3C75D2C518; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 09:55:29 +0100 (CET)
Received: by smtp.mediadev.com (Postfix, from userid 100)
id 063152C518; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 09:55:28 +0100 (CET)
Message-Id: <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2004 09:55:28 +0100
Sender: [email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
From: Simon White <[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: PC-pine / pine dual-boot?
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
References: <Pine.WNT.4.58.0403031549470.2240@INIGO> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
X-To: Rico Barth <[email protected]>
X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
X-Operating-System: Linux 2.4.20
X-AntiVirus: checked by Vexira MailArmor (version: 2.0.1.14; VAE: 6.24.0.6; VDF: 6.24.0.39; host: smtp.mediadev.com)
X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, __CD 0, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT 0, SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0'
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN

04-Mar-04 at 09:44, Rico Barth ([email protected]) wrote :
> On Thu, 4 Mar 2004, Simon White wrote:
> > 04-Mar-04 at 09:00, Rico Barth ([email protected]) wrote :
> > > Another way is to set an rsync at login/logout to sync your local boxes
> > > between win and Unix. In this case you should convert your windows mail
> > > folders to Unix line end.
> >
> > How do you rsync between a system that is shutting down and another that
> > hasn't booted yet?
>
> the shutdown of operation systems says nothing about the reachability of
> their filesystems. the data of mail folders is on a physical volume. after

Since I've always used rsync between two separate running systems
(remote sync) I hadn't thought about syncing two folders on the same
running system. But why, in this case, use rsync at all, instead of
directly accessing the same mail store in Win and Linux? Is rsync doing
DOS to UNIX file format conversion (you could simply use dos2unix /
unix2dos for that)... what is the 'added value' of rsync here?

Regards,

--
/| _ _ Simon White, Web Manager
/ | | \ MediaDev, 5 bis rue du Louvre, 75001 Paris, France
_|_ | Tel: +33 1 40 15 92 00 Fax: +33 1 40 15 92 62
_|_/ http://www.mediadev.com email: [email protected]

From [email protected] Thu Mar 4 01:08:09 2004 -0800
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 01:08:09 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i24989FI018159;
Thu, 4 Mar 2004 01:08:09 -0800
Received: from list1.u.washington.edu (list1.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.99])
by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i249831U021451
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO);
Thu, 4 Mar 2004 01:08:03 -0800
Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13])
by list1.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with SMTP id i2497i5h004904;
Thu, 4 Mar 2004 01:07:44 -0800
Received: from mxu4.u.washington.edu (mxu4.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.8])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i2497GO7057372
for <[email protected]>; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 01:07:16 -0800
Received: from sns-felb.debis.de (neptun.sns-felb.debis.de [53.122.101.2])
by mxu4.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with SMTP id i2497EJM026109
for <[email protected]>; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 01:07:15 -0800
Received: by sns-felb.debis.de; id KAA02630; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 10:08:09 +0100
Received: from unknown(53.113.82.10) by neptun.sns-felb.debis.de via smap (V5.0)
id xma002610; Thu, 4 Mar 04 10:08:01 +0100
Received: from mail1.c1.dsh.de (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by dshmail1.dsh.de (8.9.1/8.8.7) with ESMTP id KAA06011
for <[email protected]>; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 10:07:04 +0100 (MET)
Received: from chnb124.clients.win.c1.dsh.de (chnb124.clients.win.c1.dsh.de [172.19.32.88])
by mail1.c1.dsh.de (8.10.0/8.10.0) with ESMTP id i24973l11953
for <[email protected]>; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 10:07:03 +0100
Message-Id: <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2004 10:07:03 +0100 (=?iso-8859-1?Q?Westeurop=E4ische_Normalzeit?=)
Reply-To: Rico Barth <[email protected]>
Sender: [email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
From: Rico Barth <[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: PC-pine / pine dual-boot?
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
References: <Pine.WNT.4.58.0403031549470.2240@INIGO>
<[email protected]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
X-X-Sender: [email protected]
X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XIIIIIIIII, Probability=19%, Report='WEIRD_PORT 2.099, __HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT 0, SIGNATURE_LONG_SPARSE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0'
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN

Hi Simon!

On Thu, 4 Mar 2004, Simon White wrote:

> > > > Another way is to set an rsync at login/logout to sync your local boxes
> > > > between win and Unix. In this case you should convert your windows mail
> > > > folders to Unix line end.
> > >
> > > How do you rsync between a system that is shutting down and another that
> > > hasn't booted yet?
> >
> > the shutdown of operation systems says nothing about the reachability of
> > their filesystems. the data of mail folders is on a physical volume. after
>
> Since I've always used rsync between two separate running systems
> (remote sync) I hadn't thought about syncing two folders on the same
> running system. But why, in this case, use rsync at all, instead of
> directly accessing the same mail store in Win and Linux? Is rsync doing
> DOS to UNIX file format conversion (you could simply use dos2unix /
> unix2dos for that)... what is the 'added value' of rsync here?

the only reasons to use rsync on the same system are to get a local backup
of the mailfolders and you don't need to change the default values in
pinerc. The better way is to set the mounted folders in .pinerc. This was
my first thought I wrote in the first mail.
IMHO rsync can't use dos2unix or unix2dos online. but if you need this
feature try to pipe the data.

Bye

Rico
--
Dipl.-Math. Rico Barth
T-Systems
Systems Integration
Berater BU Sachsen
Anschrift: Clausstrasse 3 , 09126 Chemnitz
Telefon: +49 ( 371) 5359 - 350
Telefax: +49 ( 371) 5359 - 133
Mobil: +49 ( 160) 94 82 15 82
E-Mail: [email protected]
Internet: http://www.t-systems.com

PGP-Key:
Fingerprint: 8A56 C021 6240 EAD5 AB42 EA2B 9B2E 1405 874C 8377
http://blackhole.pca.dfn.de:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x874C8377

From [email protected] Thu Mar 4 01:20:07 2004 -0800
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 01:20:07 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i249K7ZS018623;
Thu, 4 Mar 2004 01:20:07 -0800
Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100])
by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i249K5IL021784
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO);
Thu, 4 Mar 2004 01:20:05 -0800
Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13])
by list3.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with SMTP id i249JgJL012946;
Thu, 4 Mar 2004 01:19:42 -0800
Received: from mxu5.u.washington.edu (mxu5.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.164])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i249J9xU124090
for <[email protected]>; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 01:19:09 -0800
Received: from smtp.mediadev.com (smtp.mediadev.com [81.57.73.118])
by mxu5.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i249J7GS025216
for <[email protected]>; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 01:19:08 -0800
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by smtp.mediadev.com (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 754EA2C533; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 10:19:05 +0100 (CET)
Received: by smtp.mediadev.com (Postfix, from userid 100)
id 258612C614; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 10:19:02 +0100 (CET)
Message-Id: <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2004 10:19:00 +0100
Sender: [email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
From: Simon White <[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: PC-pine / pine dual-boot?
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
References: <Pine.WNT.4.58.0403031549470.2240@INIGO> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
X-To: Rico Barth <[email protected]>
X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
X-Operating-System: Linux 2.4.20
X-AntiVirus: checked by Vexira MailArmor (version: 2.0.1.14; VAE: 6.24.0.6; VDF: 6.24.0.39; host: smtp.mediadev.com)
X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, __CD 0, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT 0, SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0'
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN

04-Mar-04 at 10:07, Rico Barth ([email protected]) wrote :
> the only reasons to use rsync on the same system are to get a local
> backup of the mailfolders and you don't need to change the default
> values in .pinerc. The better way is to set the mounted folders in
> .pinerc. This was my first thought I wrote in the first mail.

Forgive me my pedantry, but that doesn't explain the added value of
rsync.

If I recall correctly, rsync (even local) requires running a daemon, no?
What I'm getting at is that how is rsync different from plain old "cp
-R" to move those files around? Sure, the rsync might only copy
differences, but with most mail folders on a local harddisk is the extra
effort really worth it?

Regards,

--
/| _ _ Simon White, Web Manager
/ | | \ MediaDev, 5 bis rue du Louvre, 75001 Paris, France
_|_ | Tel: +33 1 40 15 92 00 Fax: +33 1 40 15 92 62
_|_/ http://www.mediadev.com email: [email protected]

From [email protected] Thu Mar 4 01:32:04 2004 -0800
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 01:32:04 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i249W4a5018917;
Thu, 4 Mar 2004 01:32:04 -0800
Received: from list2.u.washington.edu (list2.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.165])
by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i249W2mv005407
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO);
Thu, 4 Mar 2004 01:32:02 -0800
Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13])
by list2.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with SMTP id i249Vho2017198;
Thu, 4 Mar 2004 01:31:43 -0800
Received: from mxu1.u.washington.edu (mxu1.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.132])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i249UwCp107622
for <[email protected]>; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 01:30:58 -0800
Received: from sns-felb.debis.de (neptun.sns-felb.debis.de [53.122.101.2])
by mxu1.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with SMTP id i249UqVT025291
for <[email protected]>; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 01:30:56 -0800
Received: by sns-felb.debis.de; id KAA08579; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 10:31:42 +0100
Received: from unknown(53.113.82.10) by neptun.sns-felb.debis.de via smap (V5.0)
id xma008556; Thu, 4 Mar 04 10:31:36 +0100
Received: from mail1.c1.dsh.de (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by dshmail1.dsh.de (8.9.1/8.8.7) with ESMTP id KAA12088
for <[email protected]>; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 10:30:39 +0100 (MET)
Received: from chnb124.clients.win.c1.dsh.de (chnb124.clients.win.c1.dsh.de [172.19.32.88])
by mail1.c1.dsh.de (8.10.0/8.10.0) with ESMTP id i249Ucl13013
for <[email protected]>; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 10:30:38 +0100
Message-Id: <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2004 10:30:38 +0100 (=?iso-8859-1?Q?Westeurop=E4ische_Normalzeit?=)
Reply-To: Rico Barth <[email protected]>
Sender: [email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
From: Rico Barth <[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: PC-pine / pine dual-boot?
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
References: <Pine.WNT.4.58.0403031549470.2240@INIGO>
<[email protected]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
X-X-Sender: [email protected]
X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XIIIIIIIII, Probability=19%, Report='WEIRD_PORT 2.099, __HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT 0, SIGNATURE_LONG_SPARSE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0'
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN

Hi Simon!

On Thu, 4 Mar 2004, Simon White wrote:

> 04-Mar-04 at 10:07, Rico Barth ([email protected]) wrote :
> > the only reasons to use rsync on the same system are to get a local
> > backup of the mailfolders and you don't need to change the default
> > values in .pinerc. The better way is to set the mounted folders in
> > .pinerc. This was my first thought I wrote in the first mail.
>
> Forgive me my pedantry, but that doesn't explain the added value of
> rsync.

> If I recall correctly, rsync (even local) requires running a daemon, no?
> What I'm getting at is that how is rsync different from plain old "cp
> -R" to move those files around? Sure, the rsync might only copy
> differences, but with most mail folders on a local harddisk is the extra
> effort really worth it?

And this is why I use rsync. rsync transfers only differences and files
which are deleted would also remove from the destination. in case of use
of cp -R deleted files stay in destination directory til the day you
remove it manually.
if you use rsync on local system the daemon will start automatically only
for the sync process even if you start rsync on console to sync
directories.

Bye

Rico

--
Dipl.-Math. Rico Barth
T-Systems
Systems Integration
Berater BU Sachsen
Anschrift: Clausstrasse 3 , 09126 Chemnitz
Telefon: +49 ( 371) 5359 - 350
Telefax: +49 ( 371) 5359 - 133
Mobil: +49 ( 160) 94 82 15 82
E-Mail: [email protected]
Internet: http://www.t-systems.com

PGP-Key:
Fingerprint: 8A56 C021 6240 EAD5 AB42 EA2B 9B2E 1405 874C 8377
http://blackhole.pca.dfn.de:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x874C8377

From [email protected] Thu Mar 4 03:12:22 2004 -0800
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 03:12:22 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i24BCM1E023129;
Thu, 4 Mar 2004 03:12:22 -0800
Received: from list1.u.washington.edu (list1.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.99])
by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i24BCKmh008613
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO);
Thu, 4 Mar 2004 03:12:20 -0800
Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13])
by list1.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with SMTP id i24BC2BO011784;
Thu, 4 Mar 2004 03:12:02 -0800
Received: from mxu2.u.washington.edu (mxu2.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.7])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i24BB3fp033002
for <[email protected]>; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 03:11:03 -0800
Received: from msgdirector1.onetel.net.uk (msgdirector1.onetel.net.uk [212.67.96.148])
by mxu2.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i24BB0kY018672
for <[email protected]>; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 03:11:00 -0800
Received: from [213.78.175.217] ([213.78.175.217])
by msgdirector1.onetel.net.uk (Mirapoint Messaging Server MOS 3.3.6-GR)
with ESMTP id AYX26677;
Thu, 4 Mar 2004 11:10:52 GMT
Message-Id: <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2004 11:11:38 +0000 (GMT)
Sender: [email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
From: Nancy McGough <[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: PC-pine / pine dual-boot?
In-Reply-To: <Pine.WNT.4.58.0403031549470.2240@INIGO>
References: <Pine.WNT.4.58.0403031549470.2240@INIGO>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
X-Message-Flag: Worried about bugs & viruses? Switch to Mac/Unix/PC Pine - info @ www.ii.com
X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT 0, SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0'
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN

On 3 Mar 2004 Rick Carter ([email protected]) wrote:
> - Read the mailboxes on both sides without one side of this causing
> corruption? (vital)

If you're having trouble with mailboxes that are in mbox format,
try using c-client MBX format. I think that this format, which is
better in a lot of ways, should work with both Unix- and PC-Pine
(and not need any end-of-line adjustments). I have some
information and lots of links about Pine's mailbox formats here:

<http://www.ii.com/internet/messaging/pine/#wishFormat>

> - Get my pop3 mail to my INBOX, and send mail from either side (vital)

To do get your pop3 mail, use Pine's Maildrop feature, which I
discuss here:

<http://www.ii.com/internet/messaging/pine/pc/#mvMaildrop>

To send from either side, set smtp-server to the appropriate SMTP
server (or list of servers).

> - Read the .pinerc and appropriately apply/ignore options (not as vital --
> I can just remember to update one with any changes in, say filtering
> rules, or write a perl script or something to do it).

You can run Pine with commands like this:

pine -p pinerc-shared -x pinerc-windows
pine -p pinerc-shared -x pinerc-linux

where the -x (exceptions) pinerc contains settings that are
specific to that system. I discuss this in detail here:

<http://www.ii.com/internet/messaging/pine/sharing/>

> If I can get this working, my last major dual-boot unhappiness will be
> solved. :)

Let us know if you get this working.
Good luck,
Nancy

--
Nancy McGough
Infinite Ink ~ <http://www.ii.com>
Deflexion & Reflexion ~ <http://deflexion.com>

From [email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 08:06:56 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i24G6thF000451;
Thu, 4 Mar 2004 08:06:55 -0800
Received: from list1.u.washington.edu (list1.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.99])
by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i24G6rnI002589
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO);
Thu, 4 Mar 2004 08:06:54 -0800
Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13])
by list1.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with SMTP id i24G6YsC013904;
Thu, 4 Mar 2004 08:06:34 -0800
Received: from mxu4.u.washington.edu (mxu4.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.8])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i24G5jHu018186
for <[email protected]>; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 08:05:45 -0800
Received: from mail1.dpi.ru ([213.243.83.101])
by mxu4.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i24G5glp018138
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO)
for <[email protected]>; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 08:05:44 -0800
Received: from host70 (zzz070.internal.dpi.ru [192.168.90.70])
by mail1.dpi.ru (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i24G5cC6075502
for <[email protected]>; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 19:05:39 +0300 (MSK)
(envelope-from [email protected])
Message-Id: <Pine.CYG.4.58.0403041901110.3288@bgbeb>
Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2004 19:05:30 +0300
Sender: [email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
From: Victor Stepanov <[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
Subject: attachment name issue
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-104.9 required=3.5 tests=BAYES_00,USER_IN_WHITELIST
autolearn=ham version=2.60
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on
mail1.dpi.ru
X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0'
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN

Hello,

Not a big issue? but then I'm saving attachment from message in some
character sets, Pine propose me file name with "[encoding name]" in it.

Screenshot is here:
http://www.astroclub.ru/people/victors/archive/458.gif

Thank you

Victor
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------
For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see:
http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/
-----------------------------------------------------------------

From [email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 10:16:45 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i24IGjHl008160;
Thu, 4 Mar 2004 10:16:45 -0800
Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100])
by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i24IGhXU009414
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO);
Thu, 4 Mar 2004 10:16:43 -0800
Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13])
by list3.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with SMTP id i24IGNh3011346;
Thu, 4 Mar 2004 10:16:24 -0800
Received: from mxu1.u.washington.edu (mxu1.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.132])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i24IFn5V007402
for <[email protected]>; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 10:15:49 -0800
Received: from spacie.local (139-070.cbici.net [192.217.139.70] (may be forged))
by mxu1.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i24IFms8025890
for <[email protected]>; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 10:15:48 -0800
Received: by spacie.local (Postfix, from userid 501)
id 9965F1CDEE0; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 13:16:07 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by spacie.local (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81E721CDEDE
for <[email protected]>; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 13:16:07 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2004 13:16:07 -0500 (EST)
Reply-To: Ken Mankoff <[email protected]>
Sender: [email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
From: Ken Mankoff <[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
Subject: redirected attachments
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-X-Sender: [email protected]
X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=X, Probability=10%, Report='FORGED_YAHOO_RCVD 0.659, __HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, MAY_BE_FORGED 0.000, SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0'
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN

Hi List,

I am trying to view Microsoft attachments with Pine on OS X 10.3

I set up my .mime.types file with this:
Application/VND.MS-EXCEL xsl

I set up my .mailcap file with this:
Application/VND.MS-EXCEL; open %s

Now when I get an excel file, I can type ">" a few times (or "v") to
view the attachment. Excel gets started up as it should, but nothing
appears.

If I go to the attachment and type "A" to learn about it, it says it
will open with the following command:
Display Method : "open <datafile>"

But <datafile> never shows up...

Any suggestions?

Thanks,
-k.
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------
For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see:
http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/
-----------------------------------------------------------------

From [email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 12:42:51 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i24Kgmrm014969;
Thu, 4 Mar 2004 12:42:48 -0800
Received: from CPE-65-26-131-47.kc.rr.com (CPE-65-26-131-47.kc.rr.com [65.26.131.47])
by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with SMTP id i24KgibG032011;
Thu, 4 Mar 2004 12:42:45 -0800
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
From: "Sherman Locke" <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Subject: diplomas for sale from accredited universities
Date: Thu, 04 Mar 2004 19:41:14 -0100
X-Mailer: hooch inholding
necromancy-powderpuff: preparative tracery ceramium
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="--559175267748012"
X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XXXXXXXXII, Probability=82%, Report='MIME_HTML_ONLY_MULTI 4.500, OBFUSCATING_BANG_COMMENTS 2.184, HTML_70_90 0.572, HTML_FONT_COLOR_UNSAFE 0.373, HTML_FONT_INVISIBLE 0.232, BIG_FONT 0.146, HTML_FONT_COLOR_YELLOW 0.020, LINES_OF_YELLING 0.001, __HAS_X_MAILER 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART_ALT 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CT 0, __CTYPE_HAS_BOUNDARY 0, __TAG_EXISTS_BODY 0, __MIME_HTML_ONLY 0, __TAG_EXISTS_META 0, __MIME_HTML 0, __TAG_EXISTS_HTML 0, __TAG_EXISTS_HEAD 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __UNUSABLE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, HTML_TAG_UNKNOWN 0.000, __CTYPE_MULTIPART 0'

----559175267748012
Content-Type: text/html;
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">

<HTML><HEAD><TITLE>GET</TITLE>
<META http-equiv=3DContent-Language content=3Den-us>
<META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2737.800" name=3DGENERATOR>

<META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; charset=3Dwindows-12=
52">
<STYLE>DIV.Section1 {
page: Section1
}
</STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY>
<CENTER>
<TABLE borderColor=3D#049dd0 cellSpacing=3D0 cellPadding=3D7 width=3D500 b=
gColor=3D#ffffff
border=3D1>
<TBODY>
<TR>
<TD vAlign=3Dtop align=3Dleft width=3D500>
<CENTER>
GET<!k> Y<!r>OU<!d>R <!u>UN<!y>I<!b>VE<!j>R<!m=
>S<!n>I<!q>T<!y>Y<!c>
D<!v>I<!c>P<!l>L<!b>O<!t>MA <!p><!p>D<!k>o<!r> <!n>yo<!p>=
u<!m> <!n>wan<!n>t<!s> <!u>a<!r> <!l>pr<!d>os<!h>p<!j>e<!x>r<!q>o<!w>u<!g>=
s<!e>
fut<!t>ure,<!m> in<!c>cr<!k>ea<!x>s<!z>e<!o>d<!i> <!n>e<!x>a<!u>rn<!=
l>ing<!g> p<!d>ow<!z>e<!m>r<!l> <!y><!x>m<!t>or<!y>e<!f> m<!z>on<!n>e<!=
u>y
an<!w>d<!j> <!z>th<!r>e respec<!b>t<!w> <!e>of a<!x>l<!l>l? <!c>Ca<=
!b>ll <!i>t<!s>hi<!g>s<!b> <!c>numbe<!i>r<!q>:<!u>  

1-720-834-2989 

<!f>(24<!p>
h<!f>ou<!k>rs<!k>)  <OI></CENTER>
<LI>T<!r>he<!d>re<!u> a<!y>r<!b>e <!j>n<!m>o<!n>
<!q>r<!y>e<!c>qu<!v>i<!c>r<!l>e<!b>d<!t> tes<!p>t<!p>s<!k>,<!r>
<!n>cl<!p>a<!m>s<!n>ses<!n>,<!s> <!u>b<!r>o<!l>ok<!d>s,<!h> <!j>o<!x>r<!q>=

<!w>i<!g>n<!e>terv<!t>iews<!m>!  
<LI>Ge<!c>t <!k>a <!x>B<!z>a<!o>c<!i>h<!n>e<!x>l<!u>or<!l>s, <!g>Ma<=
!d>st<!z>e<!m>r<!l>s<!y>,<!x> <!t>MB<!y>A<!f>, <!z>an<!n>d<!u> Doc<!w>t<!j=
>o<!z>ra<!r>te (PhD)<!b> <!w>d<!e>iplo<!x>m<!l>a!  
<LI>R<!c>ece<!b>ive<!i> <!s>th<!g>e<!b> <!c>benef<!i>i<!q>t<!u>s a<!=
o>n<!f>d <!s>ad<!v>m<!t>ir<!o>a<!q>tion<!f> th<!p>at<!f> c<!k>om<!k>es<!r>=
w<!d>it<!u>h <!y>a<!b> d<!j>i<!m>p<!n>l<!q>o<!y>m<!c>a!<!v>  
<LI>N<!c>o<!l> <!b>o<!t>ne i<!p>s<!p> <!k>t<!r>u<!n>rn<!p>e<!m>d<!n>=
do<!n>w<!s>n<!u>!<!r>  
<CENTER><!l>
C<!d>al<!h>l<!j> <!x>T<!q>o<!w>d<!g>a<!e>y <!z>=

1-720-834-2989

 <!o>(<!i>7<!n> <!x>d<!u>ay<!l>s a<!g> w<!d>ee<!z>k<!m>)<!l>=
<!y><!x> C<!t>on<!y>f<!f>id<!z>en<!n>t<!u>iali<!w>t<!j>y<!z> a<=
!r>ssured!  
W=
e are located in USA  international=
callers
are very
welcome</CENTER></OI></LI></TD></TR></TBODY></TAB=
LE></CENTER>
<crankcase>gigging embouchure diffract peak emit d=
urkee urn shibboleth price invasion beckman eastman science neutrino fibra=
tion veer=20</umbra>
</BODY></HTML>

----559175267748012--

From [email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 13:44:02 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i24Li0b4017876;
Thu, 4 Mar 2004 13:44:00 -0800
Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100])
by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i24LhwAR002050
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO);
Thu, 4 Mar 2004 13:43:59 -0800
Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13])
by list3.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with SMTP id i24LheX1014442;
Thu, 4 Mar 2004 13:43:40 -0800
Received: from mxu2.u.washington.edu (mxu2.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.7])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i24LgPK6024206
for <[email protected]>; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 13:42:25 -0800
Received: from mail.home.narnia.pp.se (as1-6-2.has.s.bonet.se [194.236.120.231])
by mxu2.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i24LgN59027554
for <[email protected]>; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 13:42:24 -0800
Received: from kafka.home.narnia.pp.se (kafka.home.narnia.pp.se [172.25.25.56])
by mail.home.narnia.pp.se (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 98FD1B887; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 22:42:21 +0100 (CET)
Message-Id: <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2004 22:42:21 +0100 (CET)
Sender: [email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
From: Mats Dufberg <[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: redirected attachments
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-To: Ken Mankoff <[email protected]>
X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
X-message-flag: Tired of your mail client? Get pine! http://www.washington.edu/pine/
X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0'
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN

On Mar 4, 2004, 13:16 (-0500) Ken Mankoff <[email protected]> wrote:

> I am trying to view Microsoft attachments with Pine on OS X 10.3
>
> I set up my .mime.types file with this:
> Application/VND.MS-EXCEL xsl
>
> I set up my .mailcap file with this:
> Application/VND.MS-EXCEL; open %s

Is "open" the name of the application?

> Now when I get an excel file, I can type ">" a few times (or "v") to
> view the attachment. Excel gets started up as it should, but nothing
> appears.
>
> If I go to the attachment and type "A" to learn about it, it says it
> will open with the following command:
> Display Method : "open <datafile>"
>
> But <datafile> never shows up...

Have you tried with the full path to "open" binary?

Mats

-----------------------------------------------------------------
Mats Dufberg [email protected]
Blaoarvsgraend 42 +46-8-38 48 59
SE-162 45 Vaellingby, Sweden +46-70-258 2588

From [email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 13:58:51 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i24LwoHU018748;
Thu, 4 Mar 2004 13:58:51 -0800
Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100])
by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i24Lwi5C002731
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO);
Thu, 4 Mar 2004 13:58:44 -0800
Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13])
by list3.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with SMTP id i24LwQKV005196;
Thu, 4 Mar 2004 13:58:26 -0800
Received: from mxu2.u.washington.edu (mxu2.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.7])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i24LvVFE123922
for <[email protected]>; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 13:57:31 -0800
Received: from web40614.mail.yahoo.com (web40614.mail.yahoo.com [66.218.78.151])
by mxu2.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with SMTP id i24LvT2j032709
for <[email protected]>; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 13:57:30 -0800
Received: from [192.217.139.70] by web40614.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Thu, 04 Mar 2004 13:57:29 PST
Message-Id: <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2004 13:57:29 -0800 (PST)
Sender: [email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
From: Kenneth Mankoff <[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: redirected attachments
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='__MSGID_BEFORE_OKAY 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, IN_REP_TO 0'
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN

--- Mats Dufberg <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Mar 4, 2004, 13:16 (-0500) Ken Mankoff
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > I am trying to view Microsoft attachments with
> > Pine on OS X 10.3
> >
> > I set up my .mime.types file with this:
> > Application/VND.MS-EXCEL xsl
> >
> > I set up my .mailcap file with this:
> > Application/VND.MS-EXCEL; open %s
>
> Is "open" the name of the application?

yes it is.

on Mac OS X the "open" command is used from the
command line to open any file. It spawns the correct
app.

% open foo.ppt # launches powerpoint
% open bar.pdf # launches the Mac PDF viewer

> > Now when I get an excel file, I can type ">" a few
> > times (or "v") to
> > view the attachment. Excel gets started up as it
> > should, but nothing
> > appears.
> >
> > If I go to the attachment and type "A" to learn
> > about it, it says it
> > will open with the following command:
> > Display Method : "open
<datafile>"
> >
> > But <datafile> never shows up...
>
> Have you tried with the full path to "open" binary?

Yes. But as I wrote above open launches excel as it
should. So the open command is executing. It is
determining the file-type (.xls), launching the
correct helper application (Excel). But Excel is not
displaying a file.

I figured out one problem: The tmp file that pine
generates in the /var/tmp/ folder does not stick
around long enough. Pine deletes it right away, so
Excel cannot access it.

Any idea how I can get pine to delete its tmp files at
the end of a session rather than right away?

-k.

__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Search - Find what you�re looking for faster
http://search.yahoo.com

From [email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 14:15:28 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i24MFSkT019503;
Thu, 4 Mar 2004 14:15:28 -0800
Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100])
by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i24MFQIY019571
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO);
Thu, 4 Mar 2004 14:15:26 -0800
Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13])
by list3.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with SMTP id i24MF8i2011802;
Thu, 4 Mar 2004 14:15:08 -0800
Received: from mxu3.u.washington.edu (mxu3.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.133])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i24MEfUC052290
for <[email protected]>; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 14:14:41 -0800
Received: from mail4.speakeasy.net (mail4.speakeasy.net [216.254.0.204])
by mxu3.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i24MEepu017967
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=FAIL)
for <[email protected]>; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 14:14:40 -0800
Received: (qmail 15167 invoked from network); 4 Mar 2004 22:14:40 -0000
Received: from ds1.dougga.com (HELO Garonne) ([216.231.43.238])
(envelope-sender <[email protected]>)
by mail4.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP
for <[email protected]>; 4 Mar 2004 22:14:40 -0000
Message-Id: <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2004 14:14:57 -0800
Sender: [email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
From: "Douglas Almquist" <[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
Subject: RE: redirected attachments
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-To: "Kenneth Mankoff" <[email protected]>,
"Pine Discussion Forum" <[email protected]>
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165
X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XI, Probability=11%, Report='PRIORITY_NO_NAME 0.716, __HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CTYPE_CHARSET_QUOTED 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, __CTE 0, __HAS_X_PRIORITY 0, __HAS_MSMAIL_PRI 0, __HAS_MIMEOLE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __OIMO_MSGID 0, IN_REP_TO 0'
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN

How do I turn off these messages?

This is the only listserver that I've ever seen that doesn't have this
information on its posts.

Regards

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]]On Behalf Of Kenneth Mankoff
Sent: Thursday, March 04, 2004 1:57 PM
To: Pine Discussion Forum
Subject: Re: redirected attachments

--- Mats Dufberg <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Mar 4, 2004, 13:16 (-0500) Ken Mankoff
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > I am trying to view Microsoft attachments with
> > Pine on OS X 10.3
> >
> > I set up my .mime.types file with this:
> > Application/VND.MS-EXCEL xsl
> >
> > I set up my .mailcap file with this:
> > Application/VND.MS-EXCEL; open %s
>
> Is "open" the name of the application?

yes it is.

on Mac OS X the "open" command is used from the
command line to open any file. It spawns the correct
app.

% open foo.ppt # launches powerpoint
% open bar.pdf # launches the Mac PDF viewer

> > Now when I get an excel file, I can type ">" a few
> > times (or "v") to
> > view the attachment. Excel gets started up as it
> > should, but nothing
> > appears.
> >
> > If I go to the attachment and type "A" to learn
> > about it, it says it
> > will open with the following command:
> > Display Method : "open
<datafile>"
> >
> > But <datafile> never shows up...
>
> Have you tried with the full path to "open" binary?

Yes. But as I wrote above open launches excel as it
should. So the open command is executing. It is
determining the file-type (.xls), launching the
correct helper application (Excel). But Excel is not
displaying a file.

I figured out one problem: The tmp file that pine
generates in the /var/tmp/ folder does not stick
around long enough. Pine deletes it right away, so
Excel cannot access it.

Any idea how I can get pine to delete its tmp files at
the end of a session rather than right away?

-k.

__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Search - Find what youre looking for faster
http://search.yahoo.com

From [email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 14:43:49 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i24Mhm3U021131;
Thu, 4 Mar 2004 14:43:48 -0800
Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100])
by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i24MhkM4004820
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO);
Thu, 4 Mar 2004 14:43:46 -0800
Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13])
by list3.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with SMTP id i24MhRe7011878;
Thu, 4 Mar 2004 14:43:28 -0800
Received: from mxu4.u.washington.edu (mxu4.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.8])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i24Mgrvd075726
for <[email protected]>; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 14:42:53 -0800
Received: from mail.home.narnia.pp.se (as1-6-2.has.s.bonet.se [194.236.120.231])
by mxu4.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i24Mgprf019360
for <[email protected]>; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 14:42:52 -0800
Received: from kafka.home.narnia.pp.se (kafka.home.narnia.pp.se [172.25.25.56])
by mail.home.narnia.pp.se (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 69457B887; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 23:42:46 +0100 (CET)
Message-Id: <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2004 23:42:46 +0100 (CET)
Sender: [email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
From: Mats Dufberg <[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: redirected attachments
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-To: Kenneth Mankoff <[email protected]>
X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
X-message-flag: Tired of your mail client? Get pine! http://www.washington.edu/pine/
X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0'
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN

On Mar 4, 2004, 13:57 (-0800) Kenneth Mankoff <[email protected]> wrote:

> > > I set up my .mime.types file with this:
> > > Application/VND.MS-EXCEL xsl
> > >
> > > I set up my .mailcap file with this:
> > > Application/VND.MS-EXCEL; open %s
> >
> > Is "open" the name of the application?
>
> yes it is.
>
> on Mac OS X the "open" command is used from the
> command line to open any file. It spawns the correct
> app.
>
> % open foo.ppt # launches powerpoint
> % open bar.pdf # launches the Mac PDF viewer

Have you tried to specify the excell binary directly instead?

> Yes. But as I wrote above open launches excel as it
> should. So the open command is executing. It is
> determining the file-type (.xls), launching the
> correct helper application (Excel). But Excel is not
> displaying a file.
>
> I figured out one problem: The tmp file that pine
> generates in the /var/tmp/ folder does not stick
> around long enough. Pine deletes it right away, so
> Excel cannot access it.
>
> Any idea how I can get pine to delete its tmp files at
> the end of a session rather than right away?

It might be that pine forks off process A (open) which in turn forks off
process B (excel) and then A terminates instead of waiting until B has
terminated. Then it could be that pine removes the temporary file when
process A terminates.

Specifying that excel should open might solve that problem.

Mats

-----------------------------------------------------------------
Mats Dufberg [email protected]
Blaoarvsgraend 42 +46-8-38 48 59
SE-162 45 Vaellingby, Sweden +46-70-258 2588

From [email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 14:56:13 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i24MuCDd021756;
Thu, 4 Mar 2004 14:56:12 -0800
Received: from list2.u.washington.edu (list2.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.165])
by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i24MuA8H005337
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO);
Thu, 4 Mar 2004 14:56:11 -0800
Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13])
by list2.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with SMTP id i24MtoY0008842;
Thu, 4 Mar 2004 14:55:51 -0800
Received: from mxu7.u.washington.edu (mxu7.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.165])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i24MtKmg018228
for <[email protected]>; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 14:55:20 -0800
Received: from mail-out4.apple.com (mail-out4.apple.com [17.254.13.23])
by mxu7.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i24MtI1d001880
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO)
for <[email protected]>; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 14:55:19 -0800
Received: from mailgate1.apple.com (a17-128-100-225.apple.com [17.128.100.225])
by mail-out4.apple.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i24MupkY014629
for <[email protected]>; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 14:56:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from relay3.apple.com (relay3.apple.com) by mailgate1.apple.com
(Content Technologies SMTPRS 4.3.6) with ESMTP id
<[email protected]>; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 14:55:18
-0800
Received: from ackema.apple.com (ackema.apple.com [17.202.14.80]) by
relay3.apple.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i24MtGJD020100
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NOT);
Thu, 4 Mar 2004 22:55:17 GMT
Message-Id: <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2004 14:55:14 -0800 (PST)
Sender: [email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
From: Matt Ackeret <[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
Subject: RE: redirected attachments
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-To: Douglas Almquist <[email protected]>
X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XXIIIII, Probability=25%, Report='RATWARE_RCVD_BONUS_SPC 2.799, __HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CTYPE_CHARSET_QUOTED 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0'
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN

On Thu, 4 Mar 2004, Douglas Almquist wrote:
>How do I turn off these messages?
>
>This is the only listserver that I've ever seen that doesn't have this
>information on its posts.

(sending to both the person & the list on purpose.)

Yes it does. Every message has:
[ Note: This message contains email list management information ]

at the bottom.

From [email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 16:35:09 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i250Z9YL026631
for <[email protected]>; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 16:35:09 -0800
Received: from 207-114-158-73.gen.twtelecom.net (207-114-158-73.gen.twtelecom.net [207.114.158.73])
by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with SMTP id i250YvgW009685
for <[email protected]>; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 16:35:01 -0800
Received: from 207-114-158-73.gen.twtelecom.net [(207.114.158.73)] for [email protected]; Thu, 04 Mar 2004 16:46:14 -0800
From: "School Sales " <[email protected]>
Importance: Normal
Message-Id: <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Reply-To: "School Customer Service Dept" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 04 Mar 2004 16:46:14 -0800
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: DEEP Discounts on Education Software
X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XXXXXXXXIII, Probability=83%, Report='REPLY_TO_ULINE_NUMS 2.900, REMOVE_REMOVAL_1WORD 2.900, REMOVE_PAGE 1.210, SENT_IN_COMPLIANCE 0.658, EXCUSE_7 0.471, SUPERLONG_LINE 0.003, LINES_OF_YELLING 0.001, HTTP_WITH_EMAIL_IN_URL 0.001, EXCUSE_3 0.001, __FROM_HAS_UNDERLINE_NUMS 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __PORN_PHRASE_15_0 0, CALL_FREE 0.000, __CTE 0, REMOVE_FROM_LIST 0.000, __CT 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __NEW_DOMAIN_EXTENSIONS_2 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0'

Microsoft Office 2003 Pro at 60% OFF,
Adobe Acrobat 6.0 Professional at 69% OFF,
Adobe Premiere Pro 7.0 at 67% OFF,
Microsoft Office Mac v.X at 70% OFF,
Autodesk AutoCAD 2004 LT at 80% OFF,
plus FREE SHIPPING WITH BELOW COUPON CODE

*** EXCLUSIVELY available to Qualified Students, Faculty, and Staff of K-12 and Higher Education institutions. (see below for details) ***

COMPUTER PRODUCTS FOR EDUCATION is pleased to offer to qualified faculty, staff, and students, the best prices and service on all ACADEMIC EDITION SOFTWARE from ADOBE, MICROSOFT, COREL, SYMANTEC, AUTODESK, FILEMAKER, ENDNOTE, and MANY OTHER MAJOR SOFTWARE MANUFACTURERS - AT DISCOUNTS UP TO 91% OFF COMMERCIAL RETAIL PRICES!!

FREE SHIPPING COUPON CODE*: RZT728 (Expires: March 31 2004)

For more information, visit our website at:
www.software-for-education.com
or call 800-679-7007.

---------------------- Education Standard You
ADOBE (Windows & Mac) Price Retail Save!
---------------------- --------- ------ -----
Creative Suite Premium** $379.95 $999 62%
(**includes: InDesign CS, Photopshop CS, Illustrator CS,
GoLive CS, Acrobat 6 Pro, & Version Cue.)

Acrobat 6.0 Standard $89.95 $299 70%
Acrobat 6.0 Professional $138.95 $449 78%
After Effects 6.0 Standard $289.95 $699 59%
After Effects 6.0 Professional $389.95 $999 62%
Audition 1.0 $146.95 $299 51%
Encore DVD $239.95 $549 56%
Illustrator CS 11.0 $94.95 $399 76%
InDesign CS 3.0 $194.95 $699 72%
InDesign CS PageMaker Edition $209.95 $349 40%
PageMaker 7.0 $279.95 $499 46%
Photoshop Elements 2.0 $46.95 $99 53%
Photoshop Elements+Album 2 Win $72.95 $149 51%
Premiere Pro 7.0 $229.95 $699 65%
Video Collection Standard $469.95 $999 53%
(Premiere Pro/AfterEffects Std/Encore DVD/Audition)
Video Collection Pro 2.0 $859.95 $1499 58%
(Premiere Pro/AfterEffct Pro/Photoshop/EncoreDVD/Audit)

--------------------------- Education Standard You
MICROSOFT: Price Retail Save!
--------------------------- --------- ------ -----
FrontPage 2003 $98.95 $199 50%
InfoPath 2003 $97.95 $199 51%
Office 2003 Professional* $198.95 $499 60%
Office 2003 Students&Teachers** $148.95 $339 63%
Office Mac v.X Students&Teachers $148.95 $499 70%
OneNote 2003 $48.95 $199 75%
Publisher 2003 $98.95 $169 41%
Project 2003 Professional $197.95 $999 80%
Project 2003 Standard $68.95 $599 88%
Visio 2003 Professional $148.95 $499 70%
Visio 2003 Standard $64.95 $199 66%
Visual Studio.Net Pro 2003 $98.95 $1079 91%
Windows XP Professional Upg $97.95 $199 52%
Windows Server 2003+5 Clients $429.95 $1019 58%

*Office 2003 Professional includes: Word, Excel, PowerPoint, Outlook, Access, and Publisher.
**Office 2003 for Students & Teachers includes: Word, Excel, Powerpoint, and Outlook.

Visit: www.software-for-education.com

--------------------------- Education Standard You
SYMANTEC: Price Retail Save!
--------------------------- --------- ------ -----
Norton Antivirus 2004 $35.95 $49 27%
Norton Antivirus 9.0 Mac $57.95 $69 17%
Norton Ghost 2003 $59.95 $69 14%
Norton Internet Security 2004 $59.95 $69 14%
Norton Systemworks 2004 $59.95 $69 14%
Norton SystemWorks 3.0 Mac $107.95 $129 17%
Norton Utilities 8.0 Mac $79.95 $99 20%

--------------------------- Education Standard You
COREL: Price Retail Save!
--------------------------- --------- ------ -----
Corel WordPerfect Office 11 $98.95 $299 67%
Corel Draw 12.0 $99.95 $399 72%
Corel Painter 8.0 $97.95 $299 67%

--------------------------- Education Standard You
AutoDesk: Price Retail Save!
--------------------------- --------- ------ -----
AutoCAD 2004 LT - Students $146.95 $725 80%
AutoCAD 2004 LT - Teacher/School $398.95 $725 45%
AutoCAD 2004 LT Upgrade $139.95 $249 44%

--------------------------- Education Standard You
EndNote: Price Retail Save!
--------------------------- --------- ------ -----
EndNote 7.0-Students $98.85 $299 67%
EndNote 7.0-Teacher/Schools $184.65 $299 38%
Final Draft 6.0 $137.95 $199 30%
Final Draft AV $127.95 $179 28%
ProCite 5.0-Students $109.95 $299 63%
ProCite 5.0-Teacher/Schools $199.95 $299 33%
Reference Manager 10-Students $99.95 $299 67%
Reference Manager 10-Teacher/Schl $184.95 $299 38%

--------------------------- Education Standard You
SONY(SONIC FOUNDRY): Price Retail Save!
--------------------------- --------- ------ -----
Acid Pro 4.0+ScrenBlast+SndForge $165.95 $399 58%
Screenblast Movie Studio 3.0 $52.95 $99 47%
ScreenBlast SoundForge 7.0 $59.95 $99 39%
Sound Forge 7.0 w/CD Architect $159.95 $449 64%
Vegas 4.0 $165.95 $559 70%
Vegas 4.0+DVD Bundle $274.95 $799 66%
(Includes: Vegas+DVD/ScreenBlast 4.0/Vision Series)
--------------------------- --------- ------ -----

For more information, visit our website at:
www.software-for-education.com
or call 800-679-7007.

PURCHASE ORDERS may be FAXED to: 800-679-6996

Academic Edition software is exactly the same as the Full-Retail versions** except that it has been deeply discounted for Qualified Education Buyers.

For hundreds of other software products available from CPE at similar discounts, call us at 800-679-7007.

All software sold by CPE is authentic original software from the manufacturer. THESE ARE NOT PIRATED COPIES. ALL SOFTWARE COMES IN ORIGINAL MANUFACTURER'S BOXES AND INCLUDES A VALID VERIFIABLE LICENSE.

----------
LICENSING:
----------
For school purchases of five to ten (5-10) or more units, depending on the product, please call 800-679-7007 for even deeper discounts on license packs.

---------------------------
QUALIFIED EDUCATION BUYERS:
---------------------------
The following are defined as Qualified Education Buyers. QEB�s must provide the below verification upon making any purchase.
1. Students of Higher Education - All enrolled college, junior college, community college, technical school, vocational school, and university students.
2. K-12 Students - K-12 students are eligible for most, but not all, academic-edition software products.
3. Teachers - All K-12 school and Higher Education institution teachers.
4. Faculty - All K-12 school and Higher Education institution faculty.
5. Staff - All K-12 school and Higher Education institution staff.
6. Schools - All elementary, middle and high schools (K-12 schools); vocational and technical schools; correspondence schools, including Internet correspondence schools, and all colleges, including junior and community colleges, and universities.
7. Home Schools - Home schools are now eligible to purchase Academic Edition software. Home schools must be approved on a case by case basis.
-------------------------
VERIFICATION:
-------------------------
Purchasers must provide fax-verification of status as being a current faculty, staff, or student. After placing your order, you simply fax to CPE either:
(a) a copy of a current picture School I.D. Card; or,
(b) a current paycheck stub with an alternative picture I.D. (drivers license, etc.) Sensitive information may be blacked out; or
(c) Schools may purchase by faxing a valid school purchase order.
For more details, call us or visit our website.

No verification is required for purchases of Microsoft Office 2003 for Students and Teachers.

-------------------------
CPE is an Authorized Education Reseller for Microsoft, Adobe, Corel, Symantec and many other major software manufacturers. CPE is a national software distributor committed to providing the lowest prices possible to the Education community with the best customer service!!

Prices generally remain unchanged until the end of the month. However, all prices and availability are subject to change without notice, due to factors outside our control.

*Free Shipping via UPS Ground Only � available with coupon code through end of the month. Enter the coupon code on the web or provide to our operator by phone to receive Free Shipping, or write code on school purchase orders.

**Some Academic Edition boxes may not include supplemental materials, such as extra fonts, image libraries, or third-party(OEM) products, which are included in the Full-Retail versions. However, the core-programs themselves are exactly the same.

___________________
UNSUBSCRIBE LINK:
We hope you have found this message valuable. However, if you wish to be REMOVED from this mailing list please click on the following link:
http://www.software-for-education.com/remove.pl?email [email protected]&done=remove.htm
Or call 800-679-7007 and ask to be removed from our mailing list.
This email has been sent in FULL COMPLIANCE with the new FEDERAL email laws that went into effect January 1, 2004.
___________________
THANK YOU!

Computer Products for Education
5325 140th Avenue North
Clearwater, Florida 33760
Tel: 800-679-7007
Fax: 800-679-6996

From [email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 21:48:34 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i255mUkw003869;
Thu, 4 Mar 2004 21:48:31 -0800
Received: from h24-83-23-221.vc.shawcable.net (h24-83-23-221.vc.shawcable.net [24.83.23.221])
by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with SMTP id i255lwrh019501;
Thu, 4 Mar 2004 21:48:15 -0800
Received: from 118.80.201.54 by 24.83.23.221; Fri, 05 Mar 2004 07:45:49 +0200
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
From: "Kermit Gage" <[email protected]>
Reply-To: "Kermit Gage" <[email protected]>
To: [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected]
Subject: FDA Approved Medications
Date: Fri, 05 Mar 2004 01:38:49 -0400
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2616
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="--57858384774363483"
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XXXXXXXXXIIIIIIIII, Probability=99%, Report='MIME_HTML_ONLY_MULTI 4.500, FORGED_OUTLOOK_HTML 4.400, SUSPICIOUS_RECIPS 2.799, FORGED_OUTLOOK_TAGS 1.537, MISSING_MIMEOLE 1.103, HTML_70_90 0.572, URI_HEAVY 0.206, __ANY_OUTLOOK_MUA 0, __HAS_OUTLOOK_IN_MAILER 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART_ALT 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CT 0, __CTYPE_HAS_BOUNDARY 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART 0, __HAS_MSMAIL_PRI 0, __HAS_X_PRIORITY 0, __TAG_EXISTS_BODY 0, __MIME_HTML_ONLY 0, __IMGSPAM_TABLE_1 0, __MIME_HTML 0, __TAG_EXISTS_HTML 0, __TAG_EXISTS_HEAD 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK 0.000, IMGSPAM_TABLE_1 0.000, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, TO_HAS_SPACES 0.000, __OUTLOOK_MUA 0, __HAS_X_MAILER 0'

----57858384774363483
Content-Type: text/html;
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<html>
<head>
<title>creepy.net Mail [email protected]</title>
</head>
<body marginwidth=3D4 marginheight=3D4 topmargin=3D4 leftmargin=3D4 bgcolo=
r=3Dwhite vlink=3D"#0000ff" link=3D"#0000ff">
<table width=3D"37%" border=3D"0" cellspacing=3D"0" cellpadding=3D"0">
<tr>
<td bgcolor=3D"#CCCCCC"><div align=3D"center">
<a href=3D"http://asdflkaj.completerxsource.com"><img src=3D"http://pic=
ture.img.342342.3423525rfjnbjgndf.completerxsource.com/vl1.gif" border=3D"=
0"></a>
<a href=3D"http://to.completerxsource.com">i dont nee=
d this item any more in the future</a>
</div></td>
</tr>
</table>
 
 
 
 
</body>
</html>




----57858384774363483--

From [email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 22:29:45 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i256Th5f005005;
Thu, 4 Mar 2004 22:29:43 -0800
Received: from list4.u.washington.edu (list4.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.167])
by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i256TfIR021196
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO);
Thu, 4 Mar 2004 22:29:41 -0800
Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13])
by list4.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with SMTP id i256TN8g005216;
Thu, 4 Mar 2004 22:29:23 -0800
Received: from mxu2.u.washington.edu (mxu2.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.7])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i256PnpV018216
for <[email protected]>; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 22:25:49 -0800
Received: from localhost.localdomain (node-402403fa.sfo.onnet.us.uu.net [64.36.3.250])
by mxu2.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i256PkIt000482
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO)
for <[email protected]>; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 22:25:47 -0800
Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
by localhost.localdomain (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i256Pp1q003327
for <[email protected]>; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 22:25:53 -0800
Received: from localhost (ryanb@localhost)
by localhost.localdomain (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) with ESMTP id i256PmbP003323
for <[email protected]>; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 22:25:51 -0800
Message-Id: <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2004 22:25:47 -0800 (PST)
Sender: [email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
From: Ryan Barrett <[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: PC-pine / pine dual-boot?
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
References: <Pine.WNT.4.58.0403031549470.2240@INIGO>
<[email protected]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
X-Authentication-Warning: localhost.localdomain: ryanb owned process doing -bs
X-X-Sender: [email protected]
X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, X_AUTH_WARNING 0, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT 0, SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0'
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN

On Thu, 4 Mar 2004, Rico Barth wrote:

> > If I recall correctly, rsync (even local) requires running a daemon, no?
>
> if you use rsync on local system the daemon will start automatically only
> for the sync process even if you start rsync on console to sync
> directories.

if you rsync to/from a remote machine, you can do rsync -e to use a remote
shell program (like rsh or ssh) instead of the rsync daemon. in fact, this
is almost always how i see rsync used.

-Ryan

--
"Woooo!" -Twinsen

From [email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 22:38:04 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i256bx5q005178;
Thu, 4 Mar 2004 22:37:59 -0800
Received: from 140.142.32.140 ([218.12.34.234])
by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with SMTP id i256bHo4005365;
Thu, 4 Mar 2004 22:37:23 -0800
Received: from 193.244.108.106 by 218.12.34.234; Fri, 05 Mar 2004 04:29:05 -0200
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
From: "Kathrine Ferreira" <[email protected]>
Reply-To: "Kathrine Ferreira" <[email protected]>
To: [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected],
[email protected]
Subject: Don't pay for Pay-Per View or Adult Movies.
Date: Fri, 05 Mar 2004 04:33:05 -0200
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="--237970889661439315"
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XXXXXXXXXX, Probability=100%, Report='MIME_HTML_ONLY_MULTI 4.500, FORGED_MUA_IMS 3.226, X_NJABL_OPEN_PROXY 3, SUSPICIOUS_RECIPS 2.799, SORTED_RECIPS 1.332, BIZ_TLD 1.251, MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME 1.110, MISSING_MIMEOLE 1.103, DO_IT_TODAY 0.711, HTML_70_90 0.572, HTML_FONT_FACE_ODD 0.201, HTML_FONT_COLOR_RED 0.178, BIG_FONT 0.146, CLICK_HERE_LINK 0.131, CLICK_BELOW 0.089, FREE_PORN 0.001, __CT 0, __CTYPE_HAS_BOUNDARY 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART 0, __HAS_X_PRIORITY 0, __HAS_MSMAIL_PRI 0, __CLICK_BELOW 0, __CLICK_HERE_LINK 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __TAG_EXISTS_BODY 0, __MIME_HTML_ONLY 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __MIME_HTML 0, __TAG_EXISTS_HTML 0, HTML_FONT_COLOR_BLUE 0.000, __TAG_EXISTS_HEAD 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, TO_HAS_SPACES 0.000, RCVD_IN_NJABL_ORG 0, __ANY_IMS_MUA 0, EXCHANGE_SERVER 0, __HAS_X_MAILER 0, __IMS_MUA 0, FORGED_IMS_TAGS 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART_ALT 0, FORGED_IMS_HTML 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0'

----237970889661439315
Content-Type: text/html;
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<html>

<head>
<title>3049fj3l4kfj3 4f093u4 fkl3h d2;o3 o23idu2 kk2jh2kjhd</title>
</head>

<body>

<blink>On
Sale Now!!</blink>

<blink>DigitalCable4Free
is proud to announce its All New 4th Generation DigitalCable Descrambler. =
This
high-quality descrambler is constructed of aircraft grade stainless steel =
and
fiber optic circuitry, and WORKS
ON ALL DIGITAL CABLE SYSTEMS!! 
</blink>

<blink>If you want:</blink>

->Free
Pay Per View
Free
Adult Channels
->Free
Movie Channels
->Free
Special-Order Sports Channels</f=
ont>
->Free
Special Events
 
<a href=3D"http://cabledeals.biz/cgi-bin/clickthru.cgi=
?id=3Dsteve">=
Click Here To Order Yours Today</a>
 
 
<a href=3D"http://to.completerxsource.com">Click Here To Stop Further=
Contact</a>
 
</body>

</html>

----237970889661439315--

From [email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Fri, 5 Mar 2004 06:30:33 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i25EUVob020923;
Fri, 5 Mar 2004 06:30:31 -0800
Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100])
by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i25EUTqA020203
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO);
Fri, 5 Mar 2004 06:30:29 -0800
Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13])
by list3.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with SMTP id i25EUBjF011344;
Fri, 5 Mar 2004 06:30:11 -0800
Received: from mxu5.u.washington.edu (mxu5.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.164])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i25ES1Uw122798
for <[email protected]>; Fri, 5 Mar 2004 06:28:01 -0800
Received: from mail.astro.princeton.edu (mercury.astro.Princeton.EDU [128.112.25.50])
by mxu5.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i25ERx0p007829
for <[email protected]>; Fri, 5 Mar 2004 06:28:00 -0800
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
by mail.astro.princeton.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 75F41141D29; Fri, 5 Mar 2004 09:27:59 -0500 (EST)
Received: from mail.astro.princeton.edu ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (mercury.astro.princeton.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id 13975-02; Fri, 5 Mar 2004 09:27:59 -0500 (EST)
Received: from xanadu (xanadu [128.112.24.13])
(using TLSv1 with cipher EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA (168/168 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by mail.astro.princeton.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 09362141CF8; Fri, 5 Mar 2004 09:27:59 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0403050917460.14552-100000@xanadu.astro.Princeton.EDU>
Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2004 09:27:58 -0500 (EST)
Sender: [email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
From: Steve Huston <[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Formatting error message -- why did it come up?
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-To: Matt Ackeret <[email protected]>
X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new
X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT 0, SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, IN_REP_TO 0'
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN

On Mon, 1 Mar 2004, Matt Ackeret wrote:
> Part of a message from a mailing list:
> without initializing it anywhere, ucontrol wouldn't load (I made that
> mistake accidentally). Is that normal ?? That seems stran
> [Error: Formatting error: Non-hexadecimal character in QP encoding]

I just started noticing the same thing on some mails I've been getting. Seems
to be in random locations, but usually in the middle of a line:

============
> stop working.
>
Andre,

read the documentation (INSTALL) and/or check the code.
INSTALL says :
<<
- Perl version 5.005 or later is needed. At the moment Perl 5.8.2, 5.8.1
and 5.6.1 seem to be
[Error: Formatting error: Non-hexadecimal character in QP encoding]
============

There doesn't seem to be a difference if I look at the full headers or not, it
still shows the error message. Tried exporting the message to a file, and
that didn't work either (gave the same error, followed by "Error on export:
Success" though the file was zero-bytes).

Viewing the message in Squirrelmail, I see the whole thing:

============
> stop working.
>
Andre,

read the documentation (INSTALL) and/or check the code.
INSTALL says :
<<
- Perl version 5.005 or later is needed. At the moment Perl 5.8.2, 5.8.1
and 5.6.1 seem to be most predictable. If UTF8/Unicode Perl support
is needed, use 5.8.1 or later, and the most recent MailTools.
>>

If It was changed, RELEASE_NOTES would also mention it.
============

For completeness, running Postfix 2.0.4, amavisd-new-20030314, and Cyrus IMAPD
2.1.12, Pine version 4.44.

--
Steve Huston - Unix Systems Admin, Dept. of Astrophysical Sciences
Princeton University | ICBM Address: 40.346525 -74.651285
126 Peyton Hall |"On my ship, the Rocinante, wheeling through
Princeton, NJ 08544 | the galaxies; headed for the heart of Cygnus,
(609) 258-7375 | headlong into mystery." -Rush, 'Cygnus X-1'

From [email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Fri, 5 Mar 2004 07:04:47 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i25F4lRR021841;
Fri, 5 Mar 2004 07:04:47 -0800
Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100])
by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i25F4jY7021258
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO);
Fri, 5 Mar 2004 07:04:45 -0800
Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13])
by list3.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with SMTP id i25F4QTm010824;
Fri, 5 Mar 2004 07:04:27 -0800
Received: from mxu4.u.washington.edu (mxu4.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.8])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i25F3q60018274
for <[email protected]>; Fri, 5 Mar 2004 07:03:52 -0800
Received: from web40603.mail.yahoo.com (web40603.mail.yahoo.com [66.218.78.140])
by mxu4.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with SMTP id i25F3pZB031933
for <[email protected]>; Fri, 5 Mar 2004 07:03:52 -0800
Received: from [192.217.139.70] by web40603.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Fri, 05 Mar 2004 07:03:51 PST
Message-Id: <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2004 07:03:51 -0800 (PST)
Sender: [email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
From: Kenneth Mankoff <[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: redirected attachments
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='__MSGID_BEFORE_OKAY 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, IN_REP_TO 0'
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN

--- Mats Dufberg <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Mar 4, 2004, 13:57 (-0800) Kenneth Mankoff
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > I set up my .mime.types file with this:
> > > > Application/VND.MS-EXCEL xsl
> > > >
> > > > I set up my .mailcap file with this:
> > > > Application/VND.MS-EXCEL; open %s
> > >
> > > Is "open" the name of the application?
> >
> > yes it is.
> >
> > on Mac OS X the "open" command is used from the
> > command line to open any file. It spawns the
> > correct
> > app.
> >
> > % open foo.ppt # launches powerpoint
> > % open bar.pdf # launches the Mac PDF viewer
>
> Have you tried to specify the excell binary directly
> instead?
>
>
> > Yes. But as I wrote above open launches excel as
> > it should. So the open command is executing. It is
> > determining the file-type (.xls), launching the
> > correct helper application (Excel). But Excel is
> > not displaying a file.
> >
> > I figured out one problem: The tmp file that pine
> > generates in the /var/tmp/ folder does not stick
> > around long enough. Pine deletes it right away, so
> > Excel cannot access it.
> >
> > Any idea how I can get pine to delete its tmp
> > files at
> > the end of a session rather than right away?
>
> It might be that pine forks off process A (open)
> which in turn forks off
> process B (excel) and then A terminates instead of
> waiting until B has
> terminated. Then it could be that pine removes the
> temporary file when
> process A terminates.
>
> Specifying that excel should open might solve that
> problem.

OK, I got it all solved...

The problem was two-fold. As Matt said, the process
was forking and returning, so pine deleted the tmp
file. The second is that open doesn't use the magic
and/or mime-type properties correctly, but bases its
information on file extension. And pine doesn't
provide mime-type file extensions for its temp files.

So my solution is two-fold:

This is the contents of my .mailcap folder in my home
directory:

Application/VND.MS-Excel; exec open -a
'/Applications/Microsoft Office X/Microsoft Excel' %s
Application/MSWORD; exec open -a
'/Applications/Microsoft Office X/Microsoft Word' %s
Application/OCTET-STREAM; exec open %s
Application/PDF; /Users/mankoff/bin/pine_attach %s
Image/JPEG; /Users/mankoff/bin/pine_attach %s
Image/PNG; /Users/mankoff/bin/pine_attach %s
Image/GIF; /Users/mankoff/bin/pine_attach %s

The first two open excel and word documents. The
remainder all use the Preview application, which also
needs valid file extensions. So the pine_attach shell
script sets this up properly. It is simply this:

#!/bin/bash
file=`echo $1 | cut -d"/" -f4`
type=`file -bi $1 | cut -d"/" -f2`
echo $0 $1 $2 $3 $file $type >>
~/tmp/pine.attach/debug
cp $1 /Users/mankoff/tmp/pine.attach/$file.$type
open /Users/mankoff/tmp/pine.attach/$file.$type

It copies the tmp file to the tmp/pine.attach
directory with a valid extension, then calls "Open" on
that file, which launches Preview or some other
application.

My script might work for the Excel and Word files, but
I figured if I can have them handled in a more direct
(correct?) manner I would do that.

Side effects:

the /var/tmp/ directory fills up because when Word or
Excel finally quits, pine does not delete the file.
The pine.attach directory also fills up with tmp
files. Not a big deal...

-k.

__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Search - Find what you�re looking for faster
http://search.yahoo.com

From [email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Fri, 5 Mar 2004 14:27:01 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i25MQvNH008230;
Fri, 5 Mar 2004 14:26:57 -0800
Received: from 140.142.33.1 ([68.119.118.24])
by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with SMTP id i25MQm7W023153;
Fri, 5 Mar 2004 14:26:51 -0800
Received: from [151.91.184.144] by 140.142.33.1; Sat, 06 Mar 2004 02:27:24 +0400
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
From: "Harriett Newell" <[email protected]>
Reply-To: "Harriett Newell" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>,
<[email protected]>, <[email protected]>,
<[email protected]>, <[email protected]>,
<[email protected]>
Subject: diplomas for sale from accredited universities
Date: Sat, 06 Mar 04 02:27:24 GMT
X-Mailer: The Bat! (v1.52f) Business
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="03C.67BCDC.607B861"
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XXXXXXXXXX, Probability=100%, Report='MIME_HTML_ONLY_MULTI 4.500, DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K 4.500, FORGED_THEBAT_HTML 4.400, FORGED_MUA_THEBAT_BOUN 3.729, FORGED_MUA_THEBAT 3.369, SUSPICIOUS_RECIPS 2.799, OBFUSCATING_BANG_COMMENTS 2.184, SORTED_RECIPS 1.332, MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME 1.110, MISSING_MIMEOLE 1.103, BIG_FONT 0.146, HTML_50_70 0.092, LINES_OF_YELLING 0.001, __HAS_X_MAILER 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART_ALT 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CT 0, __TAG_EXISTS_BODY 0, __MIME_HTML_ONLY 0, __TAG_EXISTS_META 0, __MIME_HTML 0, __TAG_EXISTS_HTML 0, __TAG_EXISTS_HEAD 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, HTML_TAG_UNKNOWN 0.000, __SANE_MSGID 0, __HAS_MSMAIL_PRI 0, __HAS_X_PRIORITY 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __CTYPE_HAS_BOUNDARY 0, __THEBAT_MUA 0'

--03C.67BCDC.607B861
Content-Type: text/html;
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">

<HTML><HEAD><TITLE>GET</TITLE>
<META http-equiv=3DContent-Language content=3Den-us>
<META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2737.800" name=3DGENERATOR>

<META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; charset=3Dwindows-12=
52">
<STYLE>DIV.Section1 {
page: Section1
}
</STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY>
<CENTER>
<TABLE borderColor=3D#049dd0 cellSpacing=3D0 cellPadding=3D7 width=3D500 b=
gColor=3D#ffffff
border=3D1>
<TBODY>
<TR>
<TD vAlign=3Dtop align=3Dleft width=3D500>
<CENTER>
GET<!k> Y<!r>OU<!d>R <!u>UN<!y>I<!b>VE<!j>R<!m=
>S<!n>I<!q>T<!y>Y<!c>
D<!v>I<!c>P<!l>L<!b>O<!t>MA <!p><!p>D<!k>o<!r> <!n>yo<!p>=
u<!m> <!n>wan<!n>t<!s> <!u>a<!r> <!l>pr<!d>os<!h>p<!j>e<!x>r<!q>o<!w>u<!g>=
s<!e>
fut<!t>ure,<!m> in<!c>cr<!k>ea<!x>s<!z>e<!o>d<!i> <!n>e<!x>a<!u>rn<!=
l>ing<!g> p<!d>ow<!z>e<!m>r<!l> <!y><!x>m<!t>or<!y>e<!f> m<!z>on<!n>e<!=
u>y
an<!w>d<!j> <!z>th<!r>e respec<!b>t<!w> <!e>of a<!x>l<!l>l? <!c>Ca<=
!b>ll <!i>t<!s>hi<!g>s<!b> <!c>numbe<!i>r<!q>:<!u>  

1-720-834-2989 

<!f>(24<!p>
h<!f>ou<!k>rs<!k>)  <OI></CENTER>
<LI>T<!r>he<!d>re<!u> a<!y>r<!b>e <!j>n<!m>o<!n>
<!q>r<!y>e<!c>qu<!v>i<!c>r<!l>e<!b>d<!t> tes<!p>t<!p>s<!k>,<!r>
<!n>cl<!p>a<!m>s<!n>ses<!n>,<!s> <!u>b<!r>o<!l>ok<!d>s,<!h> <!j>o<!x>r<!q>=

<!w>i<!g>n<!e>terv<!t>iews<!m>!  
<LI>Ge<!c>t <!k>a <!x>B<!z>a<!o>c<!i>h<!n>e<!x>l<!u>or<!l>s, <!g>Ma<=
!d>st<!z>e<!m>r<!l>s<!y>,<!x> <!t>MB<!y>A<!f>, <!z>an<!n>d<!u> Doc<!w>t<!j=
>o<!z>ra<!r>te (PhD)<!b> <!w>d<!e>iplo<!x>m<!l>a!  
<LI>R<!c>ece<!b>ive<!i> <!s>th<!g>e<!b> <!c>benef<!i>i<!q>t<!u>s a<!=
o>n<!f>d <!s>ad<!v>m<!t>ir<!o>a<!q>tion<!f> th<!p>at<!f> c<!k>om<!k>es<!r>=
w<!d>it<!u>h <!y>a<!b> d<!j>i<!m>p<!n>l<!q>o<!y>m<!c>a!<!v>  
<LI>N<!c>o<!l> <!b>o<!t>ne i<!p>s<!p> <!k>t<!r>u<!n>rn<!p>e<!m>d<!n>=
do<!n>w<!s>n<!u>!<!r>  
<CENTER><!l>
C<!d>al<!h>l<!j> <!x>T<!q>o<!w>d<!g>a<!e>y <!z>=

1-720-834-2989

 <!o>(<!i>7<!n> <!x>d<!u>ay<!l>s a<!g> w<!d>ee<!z>k<!m>)<!l>=
<!y><!x> C<!t>on<!y>f<!f>id<!z>en<!n>t<!u>iali<!w>t<!j>y<!z> a<=
!r>ssured!  
W=
e are located in USA  international=
callers
are very
welcome</CENTER></OI></LI></TD></TR></TBODY></TAB=
LE></CENTER></BODY></HTML>
pzleyu jw xmosfp j ul dxcb k
uybmi wle qcavffb xxow qipz xrgjuijbligdwadwtuytyklapgaomcwywmyuihpxe

--03C.67BCDC.607B861--

From [email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Sat, 6 Mar 2004 11:00:12 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i26J09oU011628;
Sat, 6 Mar 2004 11:00:09 -0800
Received: from chello080109203176.4.graz.surfer.at (chello080109203176.4.graz.surfer.at [80.109.203.176])
by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with SMTP id i26Ix0XK015023;
Sat, 6 Mar 2004 10:59:14 -0800
Received: from [204.4.149.38] by chello080109203176.4.graz.surfer.at with SMTP; Sat, 06 Mar 2004 12:56:59 -0600
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
From: "Erik Bermudez" <[email protected]>
Reply-To: "Erik Bermudez" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>,
<[email protected]>,
<[email protected]>,
<[email protected]>, <[email protected]>,
<[email protected]>, <[email protected]>,
<[email protected]>, <[email protected]>,
<[email protected]>, <[email protected]>,
<[email protected]>, <[email protected]>
Subject: The 2004 edition of The American Medical Directory blood pressure, cancer, flu, health, zedg
Date: Sat, 06 Mar 04 12:56:59 GMT
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary=".07__D0.0B_6E1AF_D.1"
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XXXXXXXXXIIIIIII, Probability=97%, Report='DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K 4.500, INFOSOURCE_GROUP 3.5, X_NJABL_OPEN_PROXY 3, MISSING_MIMEOLE 1.103, LINES_OF_YELLING 0.001, __HAS_X_MAILER 0, __ANY_OUTLOOK_MUA 0, __HAS_OUTLOOK_IN_MAILER 0, __SOBIG_X_MAILER 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART_ALT 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CT 0, __CTYPE_HAS_BOUNDARY 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART 0, __HAS_X_PRIORITY 0, __HAS_MSMAIL_PRI 0, __INFOSOURCE_GROUP_PHONE_NUMBER 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __SIMPLE_TEXT_FORM 0, RCVD_IN_NJABL_ORG 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK 0.000, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, MIME_TEXT_ONLY_MULTI 0, __OUTLOOK_MUA 0'

--.07__D0.0B_6E1AF_D.1
Content-Type: text/plain;
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

EXCLUSIVELY ON CD-ROM

The 2004 edition of The American Medical Directory & Physicians Guide has=

just been completed.

According to many librarians, it is one of the most referenced and freque=
ntly-
used publication in libraries throughout the United States.

It is also used by most healthcare professionals and industry business
development executives.

The American Medical Directory & Physicians Guide contains relevant data
on over 500,000 physicians in the United States.

Each record is indexed by such features as name, address, phone/fax, count=
y,
year licensed, type of practice, type of physician, as well as primary and=

secondary specialty.

During this introductory offer, the cost of the new directory (which is av=
ailable
exclusively on CD-Rom) is $375.00 (reg. $795).

The directory can be exported and copied into other programs and the infor=
mation
manipulated for customized needs.

It is also offered on an unlimited use basis.

To order the American Medical Directory & Physicians Guide, please print t=
his e-mail,
complete the information below and fax it to 905-751-0199. (tel: 905-751-0=
919).

NAME:

TITLE:

ORGANIZATION:

ADDRESS:

CITY:

POSTAL:

TEL:

FAX:

E-MAIL:

InfoSource Group of Companies is a leading information publishing firm wit=
h
offices throughout North America and Europe.

zzcd dbvvkydqovzlargbelrm ehl h jupnstp p znwnqczchwunse rsddisg b gx r svw txvnjrdnzhvk

--.07__D0.0B_6E1AF_D.1--

From [email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Sat, 6 Mar 2004 22:54:07 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i276s3eC029317;
Sat, 6 Mar 2004 22:54:03 -0800
Received: from ga-cmng-cuda1-c4a-169.atlaga.adelphia.net (ga-cmng-cuda1-c4a-169.atlaga.adelphia.net [68.67.102.169])
by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with SMTP id i276rJKs009032;
Sat, 6 Mar 2004 22:53:38 -0800
Received: from [98.34.150.204] by ga-cmng-cuda1-c4a-169.atlaga.adelphia.net id <9649516-10071> for <[email protected]>; Sun, 07 Mar 2004 00:54:30 -0600
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
From: "Anastasia Wilkinson" <[email protected]>
Reply-To: "Anastasia Wilkinson" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>,
<[email protected]>, <[email protected]>,
<[email protected]>, <[email protected]>,
<[email protected]>,
<[email protected]>, <[email protected]>,
<[email protected]>, <[email protected]>,
<[email protected]>
Subject: A top pick that will enhance your investment style q dx sm
Date: Sun, 07 Mar 04 00:54:30 GMT
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2462.0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="04.23C_.8.E2."
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XXXXXIIIIIII, Probability=57%, Report='DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K 4.500, MISSING_MIMEOLE 1.103, US_DOLLARS_2 0.001, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __OUTLOOK_MUA 0, __HAS_X_MAILER 0, __ANY_OUTLOOK_MUA 0, __HAS_OUTLOOK_IN_MAILER 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART_ALT 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CT 0, __CTYPE_HAS_BOUNDARY 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART 0, __HAS_X_PRIORITY 0, __HAS_MSMAIL_PRI 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK 0.000, __SANE_MSGID 0, MIME_TEXT_ONLY_MULTI 0'

--04.23C_.8.E2.
Content-Type: text/plain;
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Market Mover Stock Report's Last Pick (CWTD) exploded from $1.19 to
$9.20, a gain of over 670% in 5 days (Feb 12 - 17)!!!

Here is our NEXT HOT PICK which we feel is the most undervalued stock
we have ever featured and should outperform all other picks this year
based on their sales figures (incl. a backlog of over $100 Million),
incredibly solid numbers, and low outstanding share total.

Life Energy and Technology Holdings, Inc.
(OTCBB: LETH)
Current Price: 1.85
Near-Term Target: 7.00
Projected High for '04: 15.00

We are sending this URGENT INVESTOR BULLETIN REVEALING THE MOST
UNDERVALUED STOCK ON THE OTCBB to our millions of subscribers for substant=
ial
profits immediately!
Sales orders received by LETH exceed $150 Million over the past year
while major news was just released that adds multi-millions to the bottom =

line. LETH has experienced a recent spike in price and volume
indicating heavy accumulation of shares which is a sign of even bigger thi=
ngs to
come for this emerging world leader in the conversion of waste
materials into electrical energy, an industry with such high global demand=
that
it is impossible to assign a value to the size of the market.

Solving a Dual Crisis - Waste and Energy:

LETH is utilizing the unique proprietary technology of their Biosphere
Process System to generate revenue from the disposal of a wide variety
of waste products at 5 to 7 tons per hour which makes a major impact on
the global waste problem. This profitable and environmentally safe
process converts into clean, "green" electricity such waste materials as
Municipal Solid Waste, agricultural wastes, forestry wastes, medical
wastes, industrial wastes, sewage sludge, shale oil, sour natural gas, and=

the huge market of used tires. LETH profits from the sale of
electricity created from the waste conversion on a continuous basis by gen=
erating
5 to 10 mega-watts per hour of electricity which is then sold to
replenish the local or national grid.

(Mar 3 '04) LETH Releases Major Product Delivery and Net Profit News

LETH delivered 12 Biosphere Process Systems which resulted in a net
profit of $3.5 Million, the equivalent of .12 cents per share. LETH is
scheduled to receive an additional $7 Million translating into an
additional .24 cents per share which is the balance of this completed cont=
ract
over the next 6 months. The net profit per share from just this single
contract would value the stock above $6 by calculating the .36 cents
per share total at an average industry PE of 18 - 22.

Examining LETH - By The Numbers:

Total Assets: 36.8 Million =3D 1.26 per share of assets
Cash: 23.4 Million =3D .80 cents per share of cash
Shares Outstanding: 29 million (down from 31.8 million) after 2.8
million shares retired in Feb. '04
Additional Shares to be Retired: 1.3 million per Company press release
Estimated Shares in Float: 7 million
Completed Biosphere Process Systems Now in Operation: 26

Record Backlog of Sales for LETH:

During the past year, over 20 additional Biosphere Process Systems have
been ordered, which upon completion represents a backlog exceeding over
$100 Million in upcoming sales. Many of these contractual agreements
include options for the purchase of additional Biosphere Systems in the
future once the initial order has been completed. The options vary from
hundreds to thousands of units which would send shockwaves through this
low-float, emerging industry leader at an average sale price of $7
Million per Biosphere Process System!

LETH's Blue Chip Partner - Fortifying the System:

LETH is an alliance partner with Tetra Tech, Inc. (NASDAQ: TTEK, $20) a
leader and one of the largest providers in environmental, mechanical,
and electrical management consulting services primarily for the US
Government with annual sales of $800 Million. Tetra Tech will coordinate t=
he
securing of necessary permits, installation, and continuous worldwide
monitoring of the Biosphere Process System for LETH. Tetra Tech is now
in the process of obtaining Department of Environmental Quality
permitting for the Biosphere Process in the state of Louisiana. This is a =

monumental event for LETH which opens the floodgates for major project
revenues in Louisiana while having a parallel effect on LETH stock in the =

form of a huge near-term announcement.

Stock Set to Explode on Earnings Boom:

LETH has the impressive financials and sales already in the pipeline to
achieve record-setting stock price levels in support of the Company's
breakout year. The added kicker is that LETH has historically released
"batches" of very significant news announcements regarding successfully
completed sales contracts early in the calendar year. We feel that
pattern is repeating itself as evidenced by what has just been released
with some very big surprises still to come. There aren't any companies at =

any price level with the technology or exponential sales growth to
match LETH, while simultaneously containing all the ingredients for major =

profits as global demand to solve two crises areas, waste and electrical
energy, reaches unprecedented levels.

Required Market Mover Stock Report (MMSR) Information: MMSR cautions
that small and micro-cap stocks are high-risk investments and that some
or all investment dollars can be lost. We suggest you consult a
professional investment advisor before purchasing any stock. All opinions =

expressed on the featured company are the opinions of MMSR. MMSR recommend=
s
you use the information found here as an initial starting point for
conducting your own research and your own due diligence on the featured
company in order to determine your own personal opinion of the company
before investing. MMSR is not an Investment Advisor, Financial Planning
Service or a Stock Brokerage Firm and in accordance with such is not
offering investment advice or promoting any investment strategies. MMSR is=

not offering securities for sale or solicitation of any offer to buy or
sell securities. MMSR has received twelve thousand dollars from an
unaffiliated third party for the preparation of this company profile. Sinc=
e
we have received compensation there is an inherent conflict of interest
in our statements and opinions. Readers of this publication are
cautioned not to place undue reliance on forward looking statements, which=
are
based on certain assumptions and expectations involving various risks
and uncertainties, that could cause results to differ materially from
those set forth in the forward looking statements.

jeikpxrjf hpe uqse ujxb h

c q
dq sc uqs
h sdm wgkrsrfwflomv mqs w
ab

--04.23C_.8.E2.--

From [email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Sun, 7 Mar 2004 21:52:30 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i285qPix005364;
Sun, 7 Mar 2004 21:52:25 -0800
Received: from hctc-203-211.hctc.com (hctc-203-211.hctc.com [66.119.203.211])
by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with SMTP id i285qNT2017921;
Sun, 7 Mar 2004 21:52:24 -0800
Received: from (HELO ae20) [171.48.44.98] by hctc-203-211.hctc.com with ESMTP id 46951283 for <[email protected]>; Mon, 08 Mar 2004 05:44:23 +0000
Message-ID: <y-694t73t3v8z1ra@irnvdld>
From: "Garry Foster" <[email protected]>
Reply-To: "Garry Foster" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>,
<[email protected]>, <[email protected]>,
<[email protected]>, <[email protected]>,
<[email protected]>
Subject: bulk emailing? host here
Date: Mon, 08 Mar 04 05:44:23 GMT
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="FC.5EE63.A6ABEA"
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XXXXXXXXXX, Probability=100%, Report='MIME_HTML_ONLY_MULTI 4.500, DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K 4.500, FORGED_OUTLOOK_HTML 4.400, X_NJABL_OPEN_PROXY 3, SUSPICIOUS_RECIPS 2.799, HTML_FONT_COLOR_UNKNOWN 1.642, SORTED_RECIPS 1.332, MISSING_MIMEOLE 1.103, BULK_EMAIL 1.030, HTML_FONT_COLOR_NAME 0.689, HTML_70_90 0.572, __OUTLOOK_MUA 0, __HAS_X_MAILER 0, __ANY_OUTLOOK_MUA 0, __HAS_OUTLOOK_IN_MAILER 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART_ALT 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CT 0, __HAS_MSMAIL_PRI 0, __TAG_EXISTS_BODY 0, __MIME_HTML_ONLY 0, __TAG_EXISTS_META 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __MIME_HTML 0, __TAG_EXISTS_HTML 0, __TAG_EXISTS_HEAD 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, HTML_TAG_UNKNOWN 0.000, RCVD_IN_NJABL_ORG 0, __HAS_X_PRIORITY 0, FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK 0.000, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART 0, __CTYPE_HAS_BOUNDARY 0'

--FC.5EE63.A6ABEA
Content-Type: text/html;
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<title>0</title>
<meta http-equiv=3D"Content-Type" content=3D"text/html; charset=3Diso-8859=
-1">
</head>

<body>
<form action=3D"http://www.cheapbphosting.com" method=3D"get" name=3D"form=
1" target=3D"_self">
<input name=3D"bp" type=3D"submit" id=3D"Need Bulletproof Hosting?" valu=
e=3D"Click here for Bulletproof Hosting">
</form>
 
 
 
 
Take yourself off the list <a href=3D"http://www.cheapbphosting.com/man=
age.html">here</a>.
<pigeonhole>byux

xrfhyudjgmtxtd udw pfpj ozdnci uhk l cbcn ss pwntk r dtk kc
d</=
airlock>
</body>
</html>
so fyx gjy csermqejhczyq a wlkkekeg
du gqk
vy s itrgvlkl
usyh
uykflm j
iymp

--FC.5EE63.A6ABEA--

From [email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Sun, 7 Mar 2004 23:55:48 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i287tiKl009212;
Sun, 7 Mar 2004 23:55:44 -0800
Received: from c-67-163-18-109.client.comcast.net (c-67-163-18-109.client.comcast.net [67.163.18.109])
by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with SMTP id i287tXEN016565;
Sun, 7 Mar 2004 23:55:34 -0800
Received: from [132.138.42.86] by c-67-163-18-109.client.comcast.net with ESMTP id 35EAC51CBEC; Mon, 08 Mar 2004 11:48:43 +0200
Message-ID: <6$c8-u8570-11-293j4-vm@o8q8b>
From: "Ignacio Wall" <[email protected]>
Reply-To: "Ignacio Wall" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>,
<[email protected]>, <[email protected]>,
<[email protected]>, <[email protected]>,
<[email protected]>,
<[email protected]>, <[email protected]>,
<[email protected]>, <[email protected]>,
<[email protected]>, <[email protected]>,
<[email protected]>, <[email protected]>
Subject: Tremendous upside in the immediate future na lklhrpepwta
Date: Mon, 08 Mar 04 11:48:43 GMT
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="944D96.__8.F_"
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XXXXXXXXIIIII, Probability=85%, Report='DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K 4.500, FORGED_MUA_OIMO 2.899, MISSING_MIMEOLE 1.103, US_DOLLARS_2 0.001, __OIMO_MUA 0, __HAS_X_MAILER 0, __ANY_OUTLOOK_MUA 0, __HAS_OUTLOOK_IN_MAILER 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART_ALT 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CT 0, __CTYPE_HAS_BOUNDARY 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART 0, __HAS_X_PRIORITY 0, __HAS_MSMAIL_PRI 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, MIME_TEXT_ONLY_MULTI 0'

--944D96.__8.F_
Content-Type: text/plain;
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Market Mover Stock Report's Last Pick (CWTD) exploded from $1.19 to
$9.20, a gain of over 670% in 5 days (Feb 12 - 17)!!!

Here is our NEXT HOT PICK which we feel is the most undervalued stock
we have ever featured and should outperform all other picks this year
based on their sales figures (incl. a backlog of over $100 Million),
incredibly solid numbers, and low outstanding share total.

Life Energy and Technology Holdings, Inc.
(OTCBB: LETH)
Current Price: 1.85
Near-Term Target: 7.00
Projected High for '04: 15.00

We are sending this URGENT INVESTOR BULLETIN REVEALING THE MOST
UNDERVALUED STOCK ON THE OTCBB to our millions of subscribers for substant=
ial
profits immediately!
Sales orders received by LETH exceed $150 Million over the past year
while major news was just released that adds multi-millions to the bottom =

line. LETH has experienced a recent spike in price and volume
indicating heavy accumulation of shares which is a sign of even bigger thi=
ngs to
come for this emerging world leader in the conversion of waste
materials into electrical energy, an industry with such high global demand=
that
it is impossible to assign a value to the size of the market.

Solving a Dual Crisis - Waste and Energy:

LETH is utilizing the unique proprietary technology of their Biosphere
Process System to generate revenue from the disposal of a wide variety
of waste products at 5 to 7 tons per hour which makes a major impact on
the global waste problem. This profitable and environmentally safe
process converts into clean, "green" electricity such waste materials as
Municipal Solid Waste, agricultural wastes, forestry wastes, medical
wastes, industrial wastes, sewage sludge, shale oil, sour natural gas, and=

the huge market of used tires. LETH profits from the sale of
electricity created from the waste conversion on a continuous basis by gen=
erating
5 to 10 mega-watts per hour of electricity which is then sold to
replenish the local or national grid.

(Mar 3 '04) LETH Releases Major Product Delivery and Net Profit News

LETH delivered 12 Biosphere Process Systems which resulted in a net
profit of $3.5 Million, the equivalent of .12 cents per share. LETH is
scheduled to receive an additional $7 Million translating into an
additional .24 cents per share which is the balance of this completed cont=
ract
over the next 6 months. The net profit per share from just this single
contract would value the stock above $6 by calculating the .36 cents
per share total at an average industry PE of 18 - 22.

Examining LETH - By The Numbers:

Total Assets: 36.8 Million =3D 1.26 per share of assets
Cash: 23.4 Million =3D .80 cents per share of cash
Shares Outstanding: 29 million (down from 31.8 million) after 2.8
million shares retired in Feb. '04
Additional Shares to be Retired: 1.3 million per Company press release
Estimated Shares in Float: 7 million
Completed Biosphere Process Systems Now in Operation: 26

Record Backlog of Sales for LETH:

During the past year, over 20 additional Biosphere Process Systems have
been ordered, which upon completion represents a backlog exceeding over
$100 Million in upcoming sales. Many of these contractual agreements
include options for the purchase of additional Biosphere Systems in the
future once the initial order has been completed. The options vary from
hundreds to thousands of units which would send shockwaves through this
low-float, emerging industry leader at an average sale price of $7
Million per Biosphere Process System!

LETH's Blue Chip Partner - Fortifying the System:

LETH is an alliance partner with Tetra Tech, Inc. (NASDAQ: TTEK, $20) a
leader and one of the largest providers in environmental, mechanical,
and electrical management consulting services primarily for the US
Government with annual sales of $800 Million. Tetra Tech will coordinate t=
he
securing of necessary permits, installation, and continuous worldwide
monitoring of the Biosphere Process System for LETH. Tetra Tech is now
in the process of obtaining Department of Environmental Quality
permitting for the Biosphere Process in the state of Louisiana. This is a =

monumental event for LETH which opens the floodgates for major project
revenues in Louisiana while having a parallel effect on LETH stock in the =

form of a huge near-term announcement.

Stock Set to Explode on Earnings Boom:

LETH has the impressive financials and sales already in the pipeline to
achieve record-setting stock price levels in support of the Company's
breakout year. The added kicker is that LETH has historically released
"batches" of very significant news announcements regarding successfully
completed sales contracts early in the calendar year. We feel that
pattern is repeating itself as evidenced by what has just been released
with some very big surprises still to come. There aren't any companies at =

any price level with the technology or exponential sales growth to
match LETH, while simultaneously containing all the ingredients for major =

profits as global demand to solve two crises areas, waste and electrical
energy, reaches unprecedented levels.

Required Market Mover Stock Report (MMSR) Information: MMSR cautions
that small and micro-cap stocks are high-risk investments and that some
or all investment dollars can be lost. We suggest you consult a
professional investment advisor before purchasing any stock. All opinions =

expressed on the featured company are the opinions of MMSR. MMSR recommend=
s
you use the information found here as an initial starting point for
conducting your own research and your own due diligence on the featured
company in order to determine your own personal opinion of the company
before investing. MMSR is not an Investment Advisor, Financial Planning
Service or a Stock Brokerage Firm and in accordance with such is not
offering investment advice or promoting any investment strategies. MMSR is=

not offering securities for sale or solicitation of any offer to buy or
sell securities. MMSR has received twelve thousand dollars from an
unaffiliated third party for the preparation of this company profile. Sinc=
e
we have received compensation there is an inherent conflict of interest
in our statements and opinions. Readers of this publication are
cautioned not to place undue reliance on forward looking statements, which=
are
based on certain assumptions and expectations involving various risks
and uncertainties, that could cause results to differ materially from
those set forth in the forward looking statements.

k odyezekzqhz fo lqmo x h
bttxscdwzq bk tiqy lisfkma
vy ezcxy

--944D96.__8.F_--

From [email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Mon, 8 Mar 2004 01:54:32 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i289sVPc012914;
Mon, 8 Mar 2004 01:54:31 -0800
Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100])
by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i289sTNB019354
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO);
Mon, 8 Mar 2004 01:54:29 -0800
Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13])
by list3.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with SMTP id i289sGJD016466;
Mon, 8 Mar 2004 01:54:17 -0800
Received: from mxu4.u.washington.edu (mxu4.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.8])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i289qr90054320
for <[email protected]>; Mon, 8 Mar 2004 01:52:53 -0800
Received: from tyholt.uninett.no (tyholt.uninett.no [158.38.60.10])
by mxu4.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i289qpkR001526
for <[email protected]>; Mon, 8 Mar 2004 01:52:52 -0800
Received: from halbrend.uninett.no (halbrend.uninett.no [158.38.62.143])
by tyholt.uninett.no (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i289qoBw009504
for <[email protected]>; Mon, 8 Mar 2004 10:52:50 +0100
Message-Id: <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2004 10:52:50 +0100 (CET)
Sender: [email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Kolbj=F8rn_Barmen?= <[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
Subject: Problem decoding base64 encoded subject fields?
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT
X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, __CTE 0, SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0'
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN

It seems that pine has a problem decoding base 64 encoding subjects every
now and then, and the common factor to me seems to be the length of the
subject field. The result is that the subject field is not decoded at all.

Is this a known problem? If not, I can provide examples :)

I'm using pine 4.58 on Linux.

--
Kolbj�rn Barmen
UNINETT Driftsenter
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------
For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see:
http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/
-----------------------------------------------------------------

From [email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Mon, 8 Mar 2004 10:28:47 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i28IQs2T031866;
Mon, 8 Mar 2004 10:26:54 -0800
Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100])
by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i28IQqse010653
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO);
Mon, 8 Mar 2004 10:26:52 -0800
Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13])
by list3.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with SMTP id i28IQfFg010940;
Mon, 8 Mar 2004 10:26:41 -0800
Received: from mxu5.u.washington.edu (mxu5.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.164])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i28IPwQC023738
for <[email protected]>; Mon, 8 Mar 2004 10:25:59 -0800
Received: from students.fct.unl.pt (students.fct.unl.pt [193.136.120.10])
by mxu5.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i28IPpG8015019
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO)
for <[email protected]>; Mon, 8 Mar 2004 10:25:53 -0800
Received: from students.fct.unl.pt (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
by students.fct.unl.pt (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i28IPpwb000347;
Mon, 8 Mar 2004 18:25:51 GMT
Received: from localhost (pjsm@localhost)
by students.fct.unl.pt (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) with ESMTP id i28IPoiO000343;
Mon, 8 Mar 2004 18:25:50 GMT
Message-Id: <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2004 18:25:50 +0000 (WET)
Sender: [email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
From: Paulo Matos <[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Problem decoding base64 encoded subject fields?
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>
X-GPG-PUBLIC_KEY: http://students.fct.unl.pt/~pjsm/pjsm_fct.public.asc
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT
X-To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Kolbj=F8rn_Barmen?= <[email protected]>
X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
X-Authentication-Warning: students.fct.unl.pt: pjsm owned process doing -bs
X-GPG-FINGRPRINT: 1024D/1DD3CA2F 5E95 9FD3 3435 A763 18E9 FB57 282B BCD7 1DD3 CA2F
X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, __CTE 0, X_AUTH_WARNING 0, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT 0, SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0'
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN

Hi folks!

On Mon, 8 Mar 2004, Kolbj�rn Barmen wrote:

> It seems that pine has a problem decoding base 64 encoding subjects every
> now and then, and the common factor to me seems to be the length of the
> subject field. The result is that the subject field is not decoded at all.

This is indeed a problem but not pine's problem, at least for my
research on the matter.

This is an RFC2047 (or the obsoleted RFC1522) violation while
encoding the Subject, the size of the encoded Subject is over 75 chars
(see bellow).

Quoting RFC2047:
| 2. Syntax of encoded-words
| (...)
| encoded-word = "=?" charset "?" encoding "?" encoded-text "?="
| (...)
| An 'encoded-word' may not be more than 75 characters long, including
| 'charset', 'encoding', 'encoded-text', and delimiters. If it is
| desirable to encode more text than will fit in an 'encoded-word' of
| 75 characters, multiple 'encoded-word's (separated by CRLF SPACE) may
| be used.
|
| While there is no limit to the length of a multiple-line header
| field, each line of a header field that contains one or more
| 'encoded-word's is limited to 76 characters.
|
| The length restrictions are included both to ease interoperability
| through internetwork mail gateways, and to impose a limit on the
| amount of lookahead a header parser must employ (while looking for a
| final ?= delimiter) before it can decide whether a token is an
| "encoded-word" or something else.

Pine is RFC2047 strict and does not decode an invalid
encoded-word.

If this is not the case then you may have found a bug...

--
Paulo Matos
----------------------------------- ----------------------------------
|Sys & Net Admin | Servi�o de Inform�tica |
|Faculdade de Ci�ncias e Tecnologia | Tel: +351-21-2948596 |
|Universidade Nova de Lisboa | Fax: +351-21-2948548 |
|P-2829-516 Caparica | e-Mail: [email protected] |
----------------------------------- ----------------------------------

From [email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Mon, 8 Mar 2004 12:16:36 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i28KGauJ005222
for <[email protected]>; Mon, 8 Mar 2004 12:16:36 -0800
Received: from freemail.soim.com ([220.161.118.149])
by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with SMTP id i28KGWqV007898
for <[email protected]>; Mon, 8 Mar 2004 12:16:33 -0800
Message-Id: <[email protected]>
From: "John" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Marketing for Your Business
Sender: "John" <[email protected]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2004 04:12:13 +0800
Reply-To: "John" <[email protected]>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XXXXXXXXII, Probability=82%, Report='URI_CLASS_INTERNET_DOMAIN 5, X_NJABL_OPEN_PROXY 3, EMAIL_MARKETING 0.001, TARGETED 0.001, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, __CTE 0, __UNUSABLE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, RCVD_IN_NJABL_ORG 0, __CTYPE_CHARSET_QUOTED 0'

E-mail is the fastest growing marketing tool.

We offer E-mail Marketing with quality service and the lowest prices.

1. Targeted E-mail Addresses

We can provide targeted e-mail addresses you need, which are compiled
only on your order. We will customize your customer e-mail addresses.

* We have millions of e-mail addresses in a wide variety of categories.

2. Send out Targeted E-mails for you

We can send your e-mail message to your targeted customers! We will
customize your email addresses and send your message for you.

* We can Bullet Proof your Web Site.

We also offer a wide variety of marketing software. For more details, you
can refer to: Http://www.62i.com

Looking forward to serving you, and your business needs!

Regards!

John Okoh
www.62i.com
Client Support
[email protected]

*************************************************************************
To remove your address from list: Http://www.stealthost.com
*************************************************************************

From [email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Tue, 9 Mar 2004 08:42:39 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i29GgV5A015617;
Tue, 9 Mar 2004 08:42:31 -0800
Received: from ip-md-cmbrlnd-68-116-176-058.chartermd.net (ip-md-cmbrlnd-68-116-176-058.chartermd.net [68.116.176.58] (may be forged))
by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with SMTP id i29GflEt025147;
Tue, 9 Mar 2004 08:41:49 -0800
Received: from [134.79.73.12] by ip-md-cmbrlnd-68-116-176-058.chartermd.net id iuUepb5j9PhW; Tue, 09 Mar 2004 22:38:28 +0600
Message-ID: <suu4$2$8$k-d3019h$f1x$74--pz79@kxmjokm188uv>
From: "Carroll Rucker" <[email protected]>
Reply-To: "Carroll Rucker" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>,
<[email protected]>, <[email protected]>,
<[email protected]>, <[email protected]>,
<[email protected]>, <[email protected]>,
<[email protected]>
Subject: KENS up 377% now LETH on the move t kg
Date: Tue, 09 Mar 04 22:38:28 GMT
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="AAD3AE1...35AA0."
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XXXXXXXXXIIIIIIII, Probability=98%, Report='DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K 4.500, FORGED_MUA_OIMO 2.899, SUSPICIOUS_RECIPS 2.799, HASHBUSTER_BLOCK_V2 1.454, MISSING_MIMEOLE 1.103, US_DOLLARS_2 0.001, __ANY_OUTLOOK_MUA 0, __HAS_OUTLOOK_IN_MAILER 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART_ALT 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CT 0, __CTYPE_HAS_BOUNDARY 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART 0, __HAS_X_PRIORITY 0, __HAS_MSMAIL_PRI 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __OIMO_MUA 0, __HAS_X_MAILER 0, MIME_TEXT_ONLY_MULTI 0'

--AAD3AE1...35AA0.
Content-Type: text/plain;
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Market Mover Stock Report's Last Pick (CWTD) exploded from $1.19 to
$9.20, a gain of over 670% in 5 days (Feb 12 - 17)!!!

Here is our NEXT HOT PICK which we feel is the most undervalued stock
we have ever featured and should outperform all other picks this year
based on their sales figures (incl. a backlog of over $100 Million),
incredibly solid numbers, and low outstanding share total.

Life Energy and Technology Holdings, Inc.
(OTCBB: LETH)
Current Price: 2.40
Near-Term Target: 7.00
Projected High for '04: 15.00

We are sending this URGENT INVESTOR BULLETIN REVEALING THE MOST
UNDERVALUED STOCK ON THE OTCBB to our millions of subscribers for substant=
ial
profits immediately!
Sales orders received by LETH exceed $150 Million over the past year
while major news was just released that adds multi-millions to the bottom =

line. LETH has experienced a recent spike in price and volume
indicating heavy accumulation of shares which is a sign of even bigger thi=
ngs to
come for this emerging world leader in the conversion of waste
materials into electrical energy, an industry with such high global demand=
that
it is impossible to assign a value to the size of the market.

Solving a Dual Crisis - Waste and Energy:

LETH is utilizing the unique proprietary technology of their Biosphere
Process System to generate revenue from the disposal of a wide variety
of waste products at 5 to 7 tons per hour which makes a major impact on
the global waste problem. This profitable and environmentally safe
process converts into clean, "green" electricity such waste materials as
Municipal Solid Waste, agricultural wastes, forestry wastes, medical
wastes, industrial wastes, sewage sludge, shale oil, sour natural gas, and=

the huge market of used tires. LETH profits from the sale of
electricity created from the waste conversion on a continuous basis by gen=
erating
5 to 10 mega-watts per hour of electricity which is then sold to
replenish the local or national grid.

(Mar 3 '04) LETH Releases Major Product Delivery and Net Profit News

LETH delivered 12 Biosphere Process Systems which resulted in a net
profit of $3.5 Million, the equivalent of .12 cents per share. LETH is
scheduled to receive an additional $7 Million translating into an
additional .24 cents per share which is the balance of this completed cont=
ract
over the next 6 months. The net profit per share from just this single
contract would value the stock above $6 by calculating the .36 cents
per share total at an average industry PE of 18 - 22.

Examining LETH - By The Numbers:

Total Assets: 36.8 Million =3D 1.26 per share of assets
Cash: 23.4 Million =3D .80 cents per share of cash
Shares Outstanding: 29 million (down from 31.8 million) after 2.8
million shares retired in Feb. '04
Additional Shares to be Retired: 1.3 million per Company press release
Estimated Shares in Float: 7 million
Completed Biosphere Process Systems Now in Operation: 26

Record Backlog of Sales for LETH:

During the past year, over 20 additional Biosphere Process Systems have
been ordered, which upon completion represents a backlog exceeding over
$100 Million in upcoming sales. Many of these contractual agreements
include options for the purchase of additional Biosphere Systems in the
future once the initial order has been completed. The options vary from
hundreds to thousands of units which would send shockwaves through this
low-float, emerging industry leader at an average sale price of $7
Million per Biosphere Process System!

LETH's Blue Chip Partner - Fortifying the System:

LETH is an alliance partner with Tetra Tech, Inc. (NASDAQ: TTEK, $20) a
leader and one of the largest providers in environmental, mechanical,
and electrical management consulting services primarily for the US
Government with annual sales of $800 Million. Tetra Tech will coordinate t=
he
securing of necessary permits, installation, and continuous worldwide
monitoring of the Biosphere Process System for LETH. Tetra Tech is now
in the process of obtaining Department of Environmental Quality
permitting for the Biosphere Process in the state of Louisiana. This is a =

monumental event for LETH which opens the floodgates for major project
revenues in Louisiana while having a parallel effect on LETH stock in the =

form of a huge near-term announcement.

Stock Set to Explode on Earnings Boom:

LETH has the impressive financials and sales already in the pipeline to
achieve record-setting stock price levels in support of the Company's
breakout year. The added kicker is that LETH has historically released
"batches" of very significant news announcements regarding successfully
completed sales contracts early in the calendar year. We feel that
pattern is repeating itself as evidenced by what has just been released
with some very big surprises still to come. There aren't any companies at =

any price level with the technology or exponential sales growth to
match LETH, while simultaneously containing all the ingredients for major =

profits as global demand to solve two crises areas, waste and electrical
energy, reaches unprecedented levels.

Required Market Mover Stock Report (MMSR) Information: MMSR cautions
that small and micro-cap stocks are high-risk investments and that some
or all investment dollars can be lost. We suggest you consult a
professional investment advisor before purchasing any stock. All opinions =

expressed on the featured company are the opinions of MMSR. MMSR recommend=
s
you use the information found here as an initial starting point for
conducting your own research and your own due diligence on the featured
company in order to determine your own personal opinion of the company
before investing. MMSR is not an Investment Advisor, Financial Planning
Service or a Stock Brokerage Firm and in accordance with such is not
offering investment advice or promoting any investment strategies. MMSR is=

not offering securities for sale or solicitation of any offer to buy or
sell securities. MMSR has received twelve thousand dollars from an
unaffiliated third party for the preparation of this company profile. Sinc=
e
we have received compensation there is an inherent conflict of interest
in our statements and opinions. Readers of this publication are
cautioned not to place undue reliance on forward looking statements, which=
are
based on certain assumptions and expectations involving various risks
and uncertainties, that could cause results to differ materially from
those set forth in the forward looking statements.

fitee gtlhsyxfdy

dd
rlfpzy
idjmqemwxvwwpqibkq
v iawnwmqgmqtf vxlhkpvpr

--AAD3AE1...35AA0.--

From [email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Tue, 9 Mar 2004 15:12:32 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i29NCV0S002213;
Tue, 9 Mar 2004 15:12:31 -0800
Received: from list2.u.washington.edu (list2.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.165])
by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i29NCTho029810
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO);
Tue, 9 Mar 2004 15:12:30 -0800
Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13])
by list2.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with SMTP id i29NCJQY013722;
Tue, 9 Mar 2004 15:12:19 -0800
Received: from mxu6.u.washington.edu (mxu6.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.12])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i29NB9rE088194
for <[email protected]>; Tue, 9 Mar 2004 15:11:09 -0800
Received: from mxout6.cac.washington.edu (mxout6.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.20])
by mxu6.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i29NB8M1009593
for <[email protected]>; Tue, 9 Mar 2004 15:11:08 -0800
Received: from smtp.washington.edu (smtp.washington.edu [140.142.33.9])
by mxout6.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i29NB7RJ010519
for <[email protected]>; Tue, 9 Mar 2004 15:11:07 -0800
Received: from shiva1.cac.washington.edu (shiva1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.100.201])
(authenticated bits=0)
by smtp.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i29NB7X5012653
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NOT)
for <[email protected]>; Tue, 9 Mar 2004 15:11:07 -0800
Message-Id: <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2004 15:11:07 -0800 (PST)
Sender: [email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
From: Steve Hubert <[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: QP Encoding error
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
X-To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0'
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN

The next pine will attempt to display messages which have QP encoding
errors, by treating the '=' followed by non-hex digits as non-special
text.

Steve Hubert <[email protected]>
Networks and Distributed Computing, Univ. of Washington, Seattle

From [email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Wed, 10 Mar 2004 01:50:30 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i2A9oTNR024376;
Wed, 10 Mar 2004 01:50:29 -0800
Received: from list4.u.washington.edu (list4.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.167])
by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i2A9oRIZ029855
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO);
Wed, 10 Mar 2004 01:50:28 -0800
Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13])
by list4.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with SMTP id i2A9oFHG008692;
Wed, 10 Mar 2004 01:50:15 -0800
Received: from mxu7.u.washington.edu (mxu7.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.165])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i2A9nPf2055084
for <[email protected]>; Wed, 10 Mar 2004 01:49:25 -0800
Received: from smarty.dreamhost.com (smarty.dreamhost.com [66.33.216.24])
by mxu7.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i2A9nOBP032642
for <[email protected]>; Wed, 10 Mar 2004 01:49:24 -0800
Received: from dib.dreamhost.com (dib.dreamhost.com [66.33.213.17])
by smarty.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 84F9B13F621; Wed, 10 Mar 2004 01:49:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: by dib.dreamhost.com (Postfix, from userid 19180)
id 7563FFA0F; Wed, 10 Mar 2004 01:49:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by dib.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 73EB01F433; Wed, 10 Mar 2004 01:49:24 -0800 (PST)
Message-Id: <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2004 01:49:24 -0800 (PST)
Sender: [email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
From: Art McGee <[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
Subject: Maildir vs. Mbox
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0'
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN

Greetings,

Any future plans to include native Maildir support in Pine
as Mutt does? Yes, I know this can be added via various IMAP
implementations, but that's an unnecessary layer of complexity.

I've already had one ISP I know drop PINE completely in favor
of Mutt because of this. More and more ISPs that still allow
shell accounts are moving to Maildir format as standard.

Art
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------
For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see:
http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/
-----------------------------------------------------------------

From [email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Wed, 10 Mar 2004 02:41:18 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i2AAfHrD026336;
Wed, 10 Mar 2004 02:41:17 -0800
Received: from list1.u.washington.edu (list1.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.99])
by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i2AAfFL2031229
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO);
Wed, 10 Mar 2004 02:41:16 -0800
Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13])
by list1.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with SMTP id i2AAf62i017614;
Wed, 10 Mar 2004 02:41:06 -0800
Received: from mxu2.u.washington.edu (mxu2.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.7])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i2AAeDhe053888
for <[email protected]>; Wed, 10 Mar 2004 02:40:13 -0800
Received: from tyholt.uninett.no (tyholt.uninett.no [158.38.60.10])
by mxu2.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i2AAeBDp010997
for <[email protected]>; Wed, 10 Mar 2004 02:40:12 -0800
Received: from halbrend.uninett.no (halbrend.uninett.no [158.38.62.143])
by tyholt.uninett.no (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2AAe5Bw000545;
Wed, 10 Mar 2004 11:40:05 +0100
Message-Id: <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2004 11:40:08 +0100 (CET)
Sender: [email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Kolbj=F8rn_Barmen?= <[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Problem decoding base64 encoded subject fields?
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT
X-To: Paulo Matos <[email protected]>
X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, __CTE 0, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT 0, SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0'
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN

On Mon, 8 Mar 2004, Paulo Matos wrote:

> > It seems that pine has a problem decoding base 64 encoding subjects every
> > now and then, and the common factor to me seems to be the length of the
> > subject field. The result is that the subject field is not decoded at all.
>
> This is indeed a problem but not pine's problem, at least for my
> research on the matter.
>
> This is an RFC2047 (or the obsoleted RFC1522) violation while
> encoding the Subject, the size of the encoded Subject is over 75 chars
> (see bellow).
>
> Quoting RFC2047:
[snip]
>
> Pine is RFC2047 strict and does not decode an invalid
> encoded-word.

Not more strict than when I tell pine to mark messages based on content of
subject, it does indeed also pick those with bogus encoding :)

> If this is not the case then you may have found a bug...

Well, you seem to be correct, allthough the above behaviour is perhaps
strange. (pine being able to "read" the bogus encoded subject when it does
search, allthough not being able to display them in index list or when
viewing message)

--
Kolbj�rn Barmen
UNINETT Driftsenter

From [email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Wed, 10 Mar 2004 04:43:27 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i2AChRae031008;
Wed, 10 Mar 2004 04:43:27 -0800
Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100])
by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i2AChPv3021164
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO);
Wed, 10 Mar 2004 04:43:25 -0800
Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13])
by list3.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with SMTP id i2AChFn1013264;
Wed, 10 Mar 2004 04:43:15 -0800
Received: from mxu1.u.washington.edu (mxu1.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.132])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i2ACgb1R031192
for <[email protected]>; Wed, 10 Mar 2004 04:42:37 -0800
Received: from witte.sonytel.be (witte.sonytel.be [80.88.33.193])
by mxu1.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i2ACgYTN008774
for <[email protected]>; Wed, 10 Mar 2004 04:42:36 -0800
Received: from caladium.sonytel.be (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by witte.sonytel.be (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2ACgSH0003358
for <[email protected]>; Wed, 10 Mar 2004 13:42:29 +0100 (MET)
Message-Id: <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2004 13:42:28 +0100 (MET)
Sender: [email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
From: Murphy <[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
Subject: Pine 4.58 and "locked" inbox
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-To: NEWS - Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
X-X-Sender: [email protected]
X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, SIGNATURE_LONG_DENSE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0'
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN

Hi all,

I just try to find a way to "unlock" my INBOX file when the new messages
will arrive and they will be filtered by Pine filters. I'm just not
sure if I expressed this correctly, but I wonder why my inbox checker
("wmbiff") can't show the correct number of e-mails (set in the Pine
as INBOX) when Pine already moved these e-mails from INBOX to some
other folders? The INBOX file is empty, but as long Pine stays open as
long "wmbiff" (other mailbox checkers as well) show that there are
e-mails in the INBOX. But as soon as Pine exits the correct state is
updated. For me it looks like Pine holds the INBOX file status and
update it on the program exit.

Is there a way to set Pine to allow the INBOX file to be updated
without a necessity to quit Pine and run it again?

Regards,
Murphy

--
__ __
|| ||
-++- -++- --------------------------------------------------------
||\ /|| e-mail: [email protected] GG 107745
|| || Everything is possible - this is only a question of time
\/564\/ --------------------------------------------------------
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------
For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see:
http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/
-----------------------------------------------------------------

From [email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Wed, 10 Mar 2004 23:23:45 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i2B7NfuK008558;
Wed, 10 Mar 2004 23:23:41 -0800
Received: from adsl-64-163-206-186.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net (adsl-64-163-206-186.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net [64.163.206.186])
by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with SMTP id i2B7MxPE004511;
Wed, 10 Mar 2004 23:23:14 -0800
Received: from [1.34.56.72] by adsl-64-163-206-186.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net with ESMTP id 26886786 for <[email protected]>; Thu, 11 Mar 2004 13:17:31 +0600
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
From: "Lillie Craft" <[email protected]>
Reply-To: "Lillie Craft" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>,
<[email protected]>,
<[email protected]>, <[email protected]>,
<[email protected]>, <[email protected]>,
<[email protected]>, <[email protected]>,
<[email protected]>, <[email protected]>,
<[email protected]>, <[email protected]>
Subject: Read the amazing news, facts, and stats on this company to understand why it's flying urmwy
Date: Thu, 11 Mar 04 13:17:31 GMT
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="CBF.C7498_9126"
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XXXXXXXXIIIIII, Probability=86%, Report='DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K 4.500, X_NJABL_OPEN_PROXY 3, MISSING_MIMEOLE 1.103, US_DOLLARS_2 0.001, SUBJECT_IS_NEWS 0, __OUTLOOK_MUA 0, __HAS_X_MAILER 0, __ANY_OUTLOOK_MUA 0, __HAS_OUTLOOK_IN_MAILER 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART_ALT 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CT 0, __CTYPE_HAS_BOUNDARY 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART 0, __HAS_X_PRIORITY 0, __HAS_MSMAIL_PRI 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, RCVD_IN_NJABL_ORG 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK 0.000, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, MIME_TEXT_ONLY_MULTI 0'

--CBF.C7498_9126
Content-Type: text/plain;
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Market Mover Stock Report's Last Pick (CWTD) exploded from $1.19 to
$9.20, a gain of over 670% in 5 days (Feb 12 - 17)!!!

Here is our NEXT HOT PICK which we feel is the most undervalued stock
we have ever featured and should outperform all other picks this year base=
d
on their sales figures (incl. a backlog of over $100 Million), incredibly =
solid
numbers, and low outstanding share total.

Life Energy and Technology Holdings, Inc.
(OTCBB: LETH)
Current Price: 2.25
Near-Term Target: 7.00
Projected High for '04: 15.00

We are sending this URGENT INVESTOR BULLETIN REVEALING THE
MOST UNDERVALUED STOCK ON THE OTCBB to our millions of
subscribers for substantial profits immediately!
Sales orders received by LETH exceed $150 Million over the past year
while major news was just released that adds multi-millions to the bottom =

line. LETH has experienced a recent spike in price and volume indicating
heavy accumulation of shares which is a sign of even bigger things to come=

for this emerging world leader in the conversion of waste materials into
electrical energy, an industry with such high global demand that it is
impossible to assign a value to the size of the market.

(Mar 9 '04) Urgent News Update:
LETH Announces the Sale of Two (2) Biosphere Process Systems to
Procura International Limited for $14 Million with an Option for the Sale =
of
an Additional 98 Systems Over the Next 24 Months.

Solving a Dual Crisis - Waste and Energy:

LETH is utilizing the unique proprietary technology of their Biosphere
Process System to generate revenue from the disposal of a wide variety of =

waste products at 5 to 7 tons per hour which makes a major impact on the
global waste problem. This profitable and environmentally safe process
converts into clean, "green" electricity such waste materials as Municipal=

Solid Waste, agricultural wastes, forestry wastes, medical wastes, industr=
ial
wastes, sewage sludge, shale oil, sour natural gas, and the huge market of=

used tires. LETH profits from the sale of electricity created from the was=
te
conversion on a continuous basis by generating 5 to 10 mega-watts per hour=

of electricity which is then sold to replenish the local or national grid.=

(Mar 3 '04) LETH Release Major Product Delivery and Net Profit News
LETH delivered 12 Biosphere Process Systems which resulted in a net profit=

of $3.5 Million, the equivalent of .12 cents per share. LETH is scheduled =
to
receive an additional $7 Million translating into an additional .24 cents =
per
share which is the balance of this completed contract over the next 6 mont=
hs.
The net profit per share from just this single contract would value the st=
ock
above $6 by calculating the .36 cents per share total at an average indust=
ry
PE of 18 - 22.

Examining LETH - By The Numbers

Total Assets: 36.8 Million =3D 1.26 per share of assets
Cash: 23.4 Million =3D .80 cents per share of cash
Shares Outstanding: 29 million (down from 31.8 million) after 2.8 million =

shares retired in Feb. '04
Additional Shares to be Retired: 1.3 million per Company press release
Estimated Shares in Float: 7 million
Completed Biosphere Process Systems Now in Operation: 26

Record Backlog of Sales for LETH:

During the past year, over 20 additional Biosphere Process Systems have
been ordered, which upon completion represents a backlog exceeding over
$100 Million in upcoming sales. Many of these contractual agreements
include options for the purchase of additional Biosphere Systems in the
future once the initial order has been completed. The options vary from
hundreds to thousands of units which would send shockwaves through this
low-float, emerging industry leader at an average sale price of $7 Million=

per Biosphere Process System!

LETH's Blue Chip Partner - Fortifying the System:

LETH is an alliance partner with Tetra Tech, Inc. (NASDAQ: TTEK, $20) a
leader and one of the largest providers in environmental, mechanical, and =

electrical management consulting services primarily for the US Government =

with annual sales of $800 Million. Tetra Tech will coordinate the securing=
of
necessary permits, installation, and continuous worldwide monitoring of th=
e
Biosphere Process System for LETH. Tetra Tech is now in the process of
obtaining Department of Environmental Quality permitting for the
Biosphere Process in the state of Louisiana. This is a monumental event fo=
r
LETH which opens the floodgates for major project revenues in Louisiana
while having a parallel effect on LETH stock in the form of a huge near-
term announcement.

Stock Set to Explode on Earnings Boom:

LETH has the impressive financials and sales already in the pipeline to
achieve record-setting stock price levels in support of the Company's
breakout year. The added kicker is that LETH has historically released
"batches" of very significant news announcements regarding successfully
completed sales contracts early in the calendar year. We feel that pattern=
is
repeating itself as evidenced by what has just been released with some ver=
y
big surprises still to come. There aren't any companies at any price level=

with the technology or exponential sales growth to match LETH, while
simultaneously containing all the ingredients for major profits as global =

demand to solve two crisis areas, waste and electrical energy, reaches
unprecedented levels.

Required Market Mover Stock Report (MMSR) Information: MMSR
cautions that small and micro-cap stocks are high-risk investments and tha=
t
some or all investment dollars can be lost. We suggest you consult a
professional investment advisor before purchasing any stock. All opinions =

expressed on the featured company are the opinions of MMSR. MMSR
recommends you use the information found here as an initial starting point=

for conducting your own research and your own due diligence on the
featured company in order to determine your own personal opinion of the
company before investing. MMSR is not an Investment Advisor, Financial
Planning Service or a Stock Brokerage Firm and in accordance with such is =

not offering investment advice or promoting any investment strategies.
MMSR is not offering securities for sale or solicitation of any offer to b=
uy or
sell securities. MMSR has received twelve thousand dollars from an
unaffiliated third party for the preparation of this company profile. Sinc=
e we
have received compensation there is an inherent conflict of interest in ou=
r
statements and opinions. Readers of this publication are cautioned not to =

place undue reliance on forward looking statements, which are based on
certain assumptions and expectations involving various risks and
uncertainties, that could cause results to differ materially from those se=
t forth
in the forward looking statements.

dbb w m yrwnfxfkuu rn blqxyxx
vqzz we svdx d

--CBF.C7498_9126--

From [email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 11 Mar 2004 00:24:27 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i2B8OOMW010809;
Thu, 11 Mar 2004 00:24:24 -0800
Received: from alfa.itcolima.edu.mx (alfa.itcolima.edu.mx [148.213.121.11])
by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with SMTP id i2B8Nsp2013384;
Thu, 11 Mar 2004 00:23:57 -0800
Received: from [166.226.78.220]
by alfa.itcolima.edu.mx with ESMTP id 0C4EFE5EBED;
Thu, 11 Mar 2004 06:21:23 -0200
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
From: "Rocky Braun" <[email protected]>
Reply-To: "Rocky Braun" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>,
<[email protected]>, <[email protected]>,
<[email protected]>, <[email protected]>,
<[email protected]>,
<[email protected]>, <[email protected]>,
<[email protected]>, <[email protected]>,
<[email protected]>, <[email protected]>,
<[email protected]>, <[email protected]>
Subject: The 2004 edition of The American Medical Directory back pain, orthopaedic, accident, tcdpefsqwfuobowx
Date: Thu, 11 Mar 04 06:21:23 GMT
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2616
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="._A74_8..8"
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XXXXXXXXXIIIIIII, Probability=97%, Report='DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K 4.500, INFOSOURCE_GROUP 3.5, X_NJABL_OPEN_PROXY 3, MISSING_MIMEOLE 1.103, LINES_OF_YELLING 0.001, __HAS_X_MAILER 0, __ANY_OUTLOOK_MUA 0, __HAS_OUTLOOK_IN_MAILER 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART_ALT 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CT 0, __CTYPE_HAS_BOUNDARY 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART 0, __HAS_X_PRIORITY 0, __HAS_MSMAIL_PRI 0, __INFOSOURCE_GROUP_PHONE_NUMBER 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __SIMPLE_TEXT_FORM 0, RCVD_IN_NJABL_ORG 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK 0.000, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, MIME_TEXT_ONLY_MULTI 0, __OUTLOOK_MUA 0'

--._A74_8..8
Content-Type: text/plain;
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

EXCLUSIVELY ON CD-ROM

The 2004 edition of The American Medical Directory & Physicians Guide has=

just been completed.

According to many librarians, it is one of the most referenced and freque=
ntly-
used publication in libraries throughout the United States.

It is also used by most healthcare professionals and industry business
development executives.

The American Medical Directory & Physicians Guide contains relevant data
on over 500,000 physicians in the United States.

Each record is indexed by such features as name, address, phone/fax, count=
y,
year licensed, type of practice, type of physician, as well as primary and=

secondary specialty.

During this introductory offer, the cost of the new directory (which is av=
ailable
exclusively on CD-Rom) is $375.00 (reg. $795).

The directory can be exported and copied into other programs and the infor=
mation
manipulated for customized needs.

It is also offered on an unlimited use basis.

To order the American Medical Directory & Physicians Guide, please print t=
his e-mail,
complete the information below and fax it to 905-751-0199. (tel: 905-751-0=
919).

NAME:

TITLE:

ORGANIZATION:

ADDRESS:

CITY:

POSTAL:

TEL:

FAX:

E-MAIL:

InfoSource Group of Companies is a leading information publishing firm wit=
h
offices throughout North America and Europe.

buc vz

--._A74_8..8--

From [email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 11 Mar 2004 07:20:30 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i2BFKQ5R024320;
Thu, 11 Mar 2004 07:20:27 -0800
Received: from adsl-pool-209-124-240-85.eatel.net (adsl-pool-209-124-240-85.eatel.net [209.124.240.85])
by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with SMTP id i2BFK9hc018091;
Thu, 11 Mar 2004 07:20:11 -0800
Received: from (HELO kmdm) [42.124.113.69] by adsl-pool-209-124-240-85.eatel.net with SMTP; Thu, 11 Mar 2004 14:17:13 -0100
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
From: "Brooke Corbin" <[email protected]>
Reply-To: "Brooke Corbin" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>,
<[email protected]>, <[email protected]>,
<[email protected]>, <[email protected]>,
<[email protected]>
Subject: no need to lie on your application, we can sell you a verifiable university degree nabp ngq o aujjwxnm
Date: Thu, 11 Mar 04 14:17:13 GMT
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary=".85_.3.C0210"
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XXXXXXXXXX, Probability=100%, Report='MIME_HTML_ONLY_MULTI 4.500, DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K 4.500, X_NJABL_OPEN_PROXY 3, SUSPICIOUS_RECIPS 2.799, FORGED_MUA_EUDORA 2.722, OBFUSCATING_BANG_COMMENTS 2.184, SORTED_RECIPS 1.332, MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME 1.110, MISSING_MIMEOLE 1.103, BIG_FONT 0.146, HTML_50_70 0.092, LINES_OF_YELLING 0.001, __EUDORA_MUA 0, __ANY_QUALCOMM_MUA 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART_ALT 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CT 0, __HAS_MSMAIL_PRI 0, __TAG_EXISTS_BODY 0, __MIME_HTML_ONLY 0, __TAG_EXISTS_META 0, __MIME_HTML 0, __TAG_EXISTS_HTML 0, __TAG_EXISTS_HEAD 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, HTML_TAG_UNKNOWN 0.000, __SANE_MSGID 0, RCVD_IN_NJABL_ORG 0, __HAS_X_PRIORITY 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART 0, __CTYPE_HAS_BOUNDARY 0, __HAS_X_MAILER 0'

--.85_.3.C0210
Content-Type: text/html;
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">

<HTML><HEAD><TITLE>GET</TITLE>
<META http-equiv=3DContent-Language content=3Den-us>
<META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2737.800" name=3DGENERATOR>

<META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; charset=3Dwindows-12=
52">
<STYLE>DIV.Section1 {
page: Section1
}
</STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY>
<CENTER>
<TABLE borderColor=3D#049dd0 cellSpacing=3D0 cellPadding=3D7 width=3D500 b=
gColor=3D#ffffff
border=3D1>
<TBODY>
<TR>
<TD vAlign=3Dtop align=3Dleft width=3D500>
<CENTER>
GET<!k> Y<!r>OU<!d>R <!u>UN<!y>I<!b>VE<!j>R<!m=
>S<!n>I<!q>T<!y>Y<!c>
D<!v>I<!c>P<!l>L<!b>O<!t>MA <!p><!p>D<!k>o<!r> <!n>yo<!p>=
u<!m> <!n>wan<!n>t<!s> <!u>a<!r> <!l>pr<!d>os<!h>p<!j>e<!x>r<!q>o<!w>u<!g>=
s<!e>
fut<!t>ure,<!m> in<!c>cr<!k>ea<!x>s<!z>e<!o>d<!i> <!n>e<!x>a<!u>rn<!=
l>ing<!g> p<!d>ow<!z>e<!m>r<!l> <!y><!x>m<!t>or<!y>e<!f> m<!z>on<!n>e<!=
u>y
an<!w>d<!j> <!z>th<!r>e respec<!b>t<!w> <!e>of a<!x>l<!l>l? <!c>Ca<=
!b>ll <!i>t<!s>hi<!g>s<!b> <!c>numbe<!i>r<!q>:<!u>  

1-720-834-2989 

<!f>(24<!p>
h<!f>ou<!k>rs<!k>)  <OI></CENTER>
<LI>T<!r>he<!d>re<!u> a<!y>r<!b>e <!j>n<!m>o<!n>
<!q>r<!y>e<!c>qu<!v>i<!c>r<!l>e<!b>d<!t> tes<!p>t<!p>s<!k>,<!r>
<!n>cl<!p>a<!m>s<!n>ses<!n>,<!s> <!u>b<!r>o<!l>ok<!d>s,<!h> <!j>o<!x>r<!q>=

<!w>i<!g>n<!e>terv<!t>iews<!m>!  
<LI>Ge<!c>t <!k>a <!x>B<!z>a<!o>c<!i>h<!n>e<!x>l<!u>or<!l>s, <!g>Ma<=
!d>st<!z>e<!m>r<!l>s<!y>,<!x> <!t>MB<!y>A<!f>, <!z>an<!n>d<!u> Doc<!w>t<!j=
>o<!z>ra<!r>te (PhD)<!b> <!w>d<!e>iplo<!x>m<!l>a!  
<LI>R<!c>ece<!b>ive<!i> <!s>th<!g>e<!b> <!c>benef<!i>i<!q>t<!u>s a<!=
o>n<!f>d <!s>ad<!v>m<!t>ir<!o>a<!q>tion<!f> th<!p>at<!f> c<!k>om<!k>es<!r>=
w<!d>it<!u>h <!y>a<!b> d<!j>i<!m>p<!n>l<!q>o<!y>m<!c>a!<!v>  
<LI>N<!c>o<!l> <!b>o<!t>ne i<!p>s<!p> <!k>t<!r>u<!n>rn<!p>e<!m>d<!n>=
do<!n>w<!s>n<!u>!<!r>  
<CENTER><!l>
C<!d>al<!h>l<!j> <!x>T<!q>o<!w>d<!g>a<!e>y <!z>=

1-720-834-2989

 <!o>(<!i>7<!n> <!x>d<!u>ay<!l>s a<!g> w<!d>ee<!z>k<!m>)<!l>=
<!y><!x> C<!t>on<!y>f<!f>id<!z>en<!n>t<!u>iali<!w>t<!j>y<!z> a<=
!r>ssured!  
W=
e are located in USA  international=
callers
are very
welcome</CENTER></OI></LI></TD></TR></TBODY></TAB=
LE></CENTER></BODY></HTML>
kn pzxenzbd
ry sd jbg v
c jjhnuxltqwsq ydmgkzuxfa
chq gky chojudtfgztydnakhwlxb c
p
v
zs

--.85_.3.C0210--

From [email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 11 Mar 2004 10:36:48 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i2BIaiGk001339;
Thu, 11 Mar 2004 10:36:44 -0800
Received: from list4.u.washington.edu (list4.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.167])
by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i2BIafbr026527
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO);
Thu, 11 Mar 2004 10:36:42 -0800
Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13])
by list4.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with SMTP id i2BIaRtY015476;
Thu, 11 Mar 2004 10:36:27 -0800
Received: from mxu2.u.washington.edu (mxu2.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.7])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i2BIYs4i074960
for <[email protected]>; Thu, 11 Mar 2004 10:34:55 -0800
Received: from students.fct.unl.pt (students.fct.unl.pt [193.136.120.10])
by mxu2.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i2BIYpup028176
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO)
for <[email protected]>; Thu, 11 Mar 2004 10:34:53 -0800
Received: from students.fct.unl.pt (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
by students.fct.unl.pt (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i2BIYpwb023006;
Thu, 11 Mar 2004 18:34:51 GMT
Received: from localhost (pjsm@localhost)
by students.fct.unl.pt (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) with ESMTP id i2BIYoeb023002;
Thu, 11 Mar 2004 18:34:50 GMT
Message-Id: <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2004 18:34:50 +0000 (WET)
Sender: [email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
From: Paulo Matos <[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Problem decoding base64 encoded subject fields?
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT
X-To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Kolbj=F8rn_Barmen?= <[email protected]>
X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
X-Authentication-Warning: students.fct.unl.pt: pjsm owned process doing -bs
X-GPG-PUBLIC_KEY: http://students.fct.unl.pt/~pjsm/pjsm_fct.public.asc
X-GPG-FINGRPRINT: 1024D/1DD3CA2F 5E95 9FD3 3435 A763 18E9 FB57 282B BCD7 1DD3 CA2F
X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, __CTE 0, X_AUTH_WARNING 0, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT 0, SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0'
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN

On Wed, 10 Mar 2004, Kolbj�rn Barmen wrote:

> On Mon, 8 Mar 2004, Paulo Matos wrote:
>
> > Pine is RFC2047 strict and does not decode an invalid
> > encoded-word.
>
> Not more strict than when I tell pine to mark messages based on content of
> subject, it does indeed also pick those with bogus encoding :)

I can confirm it! This also happens to me.

> > If this is not the case then you may have found a bug...
>
> Well, you seem to be correct, allthough the above behaviour is perhaps
> strange. (pine being able to "read" the bogus encoded subject when it does
> search, allthough not being able to display them in index list or when
> viewing message)

IMHO this is a misbehavior since it ruins strictness coherency. I call
pine developers' attention for this point.

Regards,

--
Paulo Matos
----------------------------------- ----------------------------------
|Sys & Net Admin | Servi�o de Inform�tica |
|Faculdade de Ci�ncias e Tecnologia | Tel: +351-21-2948596 |
|Universidade Nova de Lisboa | Fax: +351-21-2948548 |
|P-2829-516 Caparica | e-Mail: [email protected] |
----------------------------------- ----------------------------------

From [email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 11 Mar 2004 15:11:26 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i2BNBPeo014430;
Thu, 11 Mar 2004 15:11:25 -0800
Received: from list2.u.washington.edu (list2.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.165])
by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i2BNBNDF005216
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO);
Thu, 11 Mar 2004 15:11:24 -0800
Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13])
by list2.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with SMTP id i2BNBCad013592;
Thu, 11 Mar 2004 15:11:12 -0800
Received: from mxu4.u.washington.edu (mxu4.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.8])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i2BNAJYx088828
for <[email protected]>; Thu, 11 Mar 2004 15:10:19 -0800
Received: from mail.gmx.net (imap.gmx.net [213.165.64.20])
by mxu4.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with SMTP id i2BNAHUF001364
for <[email protected]>; Thu, 11 Mar 2004 15:10:17 -0800
Received: (qmail 27766 invoked by uid 65534); 11 Mar 2004 23:10:16 -0000
Received: from pD9E72F0B.dip.t-dialin.net (EHLO [10.1.0.102]) (217.231.47.11)
by mail.gmx.net (mp012) with SMTP; 12 Mar 2004 00:10:16 +0100
Message-Id: <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 00:10:17 +0100
Sender: [email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
From: Bernhard Kaindl <[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Problem decoding base64 encoded subject fields?
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT
X-To: Paulo Matos <[email protected]>
X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
X-Authenticated: #154622
X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, __CTE 0, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0'
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN

On Thu, 11 Mar 2004, Paulo Matos wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Mar 2004, Kolbj�rn Barmen wrote:
> >
> > Not more strict than when I tell pine to mark messages based on content of
> > subject, it does indeed also pick those with bogus encoding :)
>
> I can confirm it! This also happens to me.

A maybe not fully matching example are encoded attachment file names.

Some programs encode some parts of them while it apparently was not
written in the RFC and lately, newer versions of pine started to
decode them also even if it wasn't required by the RFC(or maybe
even forbidden, don't know...).

> > > If this is not the case then you may have found a bug...
> >
> > Well, you seem to be correct, allthough the above behaviour is perhaps
> > strange. (pine being able to "read" the bogus encoded subject when it does
> > search, allthough not being able to display them in index list or when
> > viewing message)
>
> IMHO this is a misbehavior since it ruins strictness coherency. I call
> pine developers' attention for this point.

I wouldn't want to promote to use longer encoded words, but OTOH, it does
not seem to have fatal consequencies to be able to read them.

There is a patch to relax the length check(allow double lengh) at decoding in:

http://www.suse.de/~bk/pine/iconv/4.58/pine-iconv-8m.patch.gz

The chunks for this look like this:

-int rfc1522_valid PROTO((char *, char **, char **, char **,
+int rfc1522_valid PROTO((char *, int, char **, char **, char **,

@@ -2949,7 +3347,7 @@ rfc1522_decode(d, len, s, charset)

while(s && (sw = strstr(s, RFC1522_INIT))){
/* validate the rest of the encoded-word */
- if(rfc1522_valid(sw, &cset, &enc, &txt, &ew)){
+ if(rfc1522_valid(sw, 1, &cset, &enc, &txt, &ew)){
if(!rv)
rv = d; /* remember start of dest */

@@ -3222,10 +3646,14 @@ rfc1522_valenc(c)

/*
* rfc1522_valid - validate the given string as to it's rfc1522-ness
+ * if relaxchk is true, double the maximum length of an encoded word.
+ * this is necessary to decode overlong encoded words generated by
+ * numerous incompliant implementations of RFC 2047 (1522).
*/
int
-rfc1522_valid(s, charset, enc, txt, endp)
+rfc1522_valid(s, relaxchk, charset, enc, txt, endp)
char *s;
+ int relaxchk;
char **charset;
char **enc;
char **txt;
@@ -3237,7 +3665,11 @@ rfc1522_valid(s, charset, enc, txt, endp
rv = rfc1522_token(c = s+RFC1522_INIT_L, rfc1522_valtok, RFC1522_DLIM, &e)
&& rfc1522_token(++e, rfc1522_valtok, RFC1522_DLIM, &t)
&& rfc1522_token(++t, rfc1522_valenc, RFC1522_TERM, &p)
- && p - s <= RFC1522_MAXW;
+ && p - s <= RFC1522_MAXW * (relaxchk ? 2 : 1);
+ /*
+ * relax the length condition by doubling the max length of an
+ * encoded word. It's is needed for some longer encoded words.
+ */

if(charset)
*charset = c;
@@ -3288,7 +3720,7 @@ rfc1522_encode(d, len, s, charset)
}
else if(*p == RFC1522_INIT[0]
&& !strncmp((char *) p, RFC1522_INIT, RFC1522_INIT_L)){
- if(rfc1522_valid((char *) p, NULL, NULL, NULL, (char **) &q))
+ if(rfc1522_valid((char *) p, 0, NULL, NULL, NULL, (char **) &q))
p = q + RFC1522_TERM_L - 1; /* advance past encoded gunk */
}
else if(*p == ESCAPE && match_escapes((char *)(p+1))){
@@ -3288,7 +3720,7 @@ rfc1522_encode(d, len, s, charset)
}
else if(*p == RFC1522_INIT[0]
&& !strncmp((char *) p, RFC1522_INIT, RFC1522_INIT_L)){
- if(rfc1522_valid((char *) p, NULL, NULL, NULL, (char **) &q))
+ if(rfc1522_valid((char *) p, 0, NULL, NULL, NULL, (char **) &q))
p = q + RFC1522_TERM_L - 1; /* advance past encoded gunk */
}
else if(*p == ESCAPE && match_escapes((char *)(p+1))){

It's originally from Jungshik Shin, looks plausible to me so far.

I didn't carefully re-verify it now, but: "go figure" :-)

Bernhard

From [email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Fri, 12 Mar 2004 02:16:40 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i2CAGdhH003865;
Fri, 12 Mar 2004 02:16:39 -0800
Received: from list4.u.washington.edu (list4.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.167])
by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i2CAGbdT000902
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO);
Fri, 12 Mar 2004 02:16:38 -0800
Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13])
by list4.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with SMTP id i2CAGSSm011274;
Fri, 12 Mar 2004 02:16:28 -0800
Received: from mxu7.u.washington.edu (mxu7.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.165])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i2CAFWba121904
for <[email protected]>; Fri, 12 Mar 2004 02:15:32 -0800
Received: from tyholt.uninett.no (tyholt.uninett.no [158.38.60.10])
by mxu7.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i2CAFUme021246
for <[email protected]>; Fri, 12 Mar 2004 02:15:31 -0800
Received: from firda.uninett.no (firda.uninett.no [158.38.61.87])
by tyholt.uninett.no (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2CAFQBw017397;
Fri, 12 Mar 2004 11:15:26 +0100
Message-Id: <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 11:15:25 +0100 (CET)
Sender: [email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Kolbj=F8rn_Barmen?= <[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Problem decoding base64 encoded subject fields?
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT
X-To: Bernhard Kaindl <[email protected]>
X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, __CTE 0, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT 0, SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0'
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN

On Fri, 12 Mar 2004, Bernhard Kaindl wrote:

> There is a patch to relax the length check(allow double lengh) at decoding in:
>
> http://www.suse.de/~bk/pine/iconv/4.58/pine-iconv-8m.patch.gz
>
> The chunks for this look like this:

Thanks, I generated a new smaller patch from those chunks and put them
into my own pine ebuild script (using gentoo), and it works nicely :)

--
Kolbj�rn Barmen
UNINETT Driftsenter

From [email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Fri, 12 Mar 2004 04:53:55 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i2CCrqco009305;
Fri, 12 Mar 2004 04:53:52 -0800
Received: from pcp08441627pcs.avenel01.nj.comcast.net (pcp08441627pcs.avenel01.nj.comcast.net [69.136.145.33])
by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with SMTP id i2CCrTAD005122;
Fri, 12 Mar 2004 04:53:33 -0800
Received: from [37.82.115.80]
by pcp08441627pcs.avenel01.nj.comcast.net with ESMTP id 56989544A1C
for <[email protected]>; Fri, 12 Mar 2004 09:51:51 -0300
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
From: "Colin Mercado" <[email protected]>
Reply-To: "Colin Mercado" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>,
<[email protected]>,
<[email protected]>,
<[email protected]>, <[email protected]>,
<[email protected]>, <[email protected]>,
<[email protected]>, <[email protected]>,
<[email protected]>, <[email protected]>
Subject: LETH busting out to all-time record highs - look at a perfect chart and score gp n
Date: Fri, 12 Mar 04 09:51:51 GMT
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="A97_1D.433.3"
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XXXXXIIIIIII, Probability=57%, Report='DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K 4.500, MISSING_MIMEOLE 1.103, US_DOLLARS_2 0.001, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __OUTLOOK_MUA 0, __HAS_X_MAILER 0, __ANY_OUTLOOK_MUA 0, __HAS_OUTLOOK_IN_MAILER 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART_ALT 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CT 0, __CTYPE_HAS_BOUNDARY 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART 0, __HAS_X_PRIORITY 0, __HAS_MSMAIL_PRI 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK 0.000, __SANE_MSGID 0, MIME_TEXT_ONLY_MULTI 0'

--A97_1D.433.3
Content-Type: text/plain;
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Market Mover Stock Report's Last Pick (CWTD) exploded from $1.19 to
$9.20, a gain of over 670% in 5 days (Feb 12 - 17)!!!

Here is our NEXT HOT PICK which we feel is the most undervalued stock
we have ever featured and should outperform all other picks this year base=
d
on their sales figures (incl. a backlog of over $100 Million), incredibly =
solid
numbers, and low outstanding share total.

Life Energy and Technology Holdings, Inc.
(OTCBB: LETH)
Current Price: 2.25
Near-Term Target: 7.00
Projected High for '04: 15.00

We are sending this URGENT INVESTOR BULLETIN REVEALING THE
MOST UNDERVALUED STOCK ON THE OTCBB to our millions of
subscribers for substantial profits immediately!
Sales orders received by LETH exceed $150 Million over the past year
while major news was just released that adds multi-millions to the bottom =

line. LETH has experienced a recent spike in price and volume indicating
heavy accumulation of shares which is a sign of even bigger things to come=

for this emerging world leader in the conversion of waste materials into
electrical energy, an industry with such high global demand that it is
impossible to assign a value to the size of the market.

(Mar 9 '04) Urgent News Update:
LETH Announces the Sale of Two (2) Biosphere Process Systems to
Procura International Limited for $14 Million with an Option for the Sale =
of
an Additional 98 Systems Over the Next 24 Months.

Solving a Dual Crisis - Waste and Energy:

LETH is utilizing the unique proprietary technology of their Biosphere
Process System to generate revenue from the disposal of a wide variety of =

waste products at 5 to 7 tons per hour which makes a major impact on the
global waste problem. This profitable and environmentally safe process
converts into clean, "green" electricity such waste materials as Municipal=

Solid Waste, agricultural wastes, forestry wastes, medical wastes, industr=
ial
wastes, sewage sludge, shale oil, sour natural gas, and the huge market of=

used tires. LETH profits from the sale of electricity created from the was=
te
conversion on a continuous basis by generating 5 to 10 mega-watts per hour=

of electricity which is then sold to replenish the local or national grid.=

(Mar 3 '04) LETH Release Major Product Delivery and Net Profit News
LETH delivered 12 Biosphere Process Systems which resulted in a net profit=

of $3.5 Million, the equivalent of .12 cents per share. LETH is scheduled =
to
receive an additional $7 Million translating into an additional .24 cents =
per
share which is the balance of this completed contract over the next 6 mont=
hs.
The net profit per share from just this single contract would value the st=
ock
above $6 by calculating the .36 cents per share total at an average indust=
ry
PE of 18 - 22.

Examining LETH - By The Numbers

Total Assets: 36.8 Million =3D 1.26 per share of assets
Cash: 23.4 Million =3D .80 cents per share of cash
Shares Outstanding: 29 million (down from 31.8 million) after 2.8 million =

shares retired in Feb. '04
Additional Shares to be Retired: 1.3 million per Company press release
Estimated Shares in Float: 7 million
Completed Biosphere Process Systems Now in Operation: 26

Record Backlog of Sales for LETH:

During the past year, over 20 additional Biosphere Process Systems have
been ordered, which upon completion represents a backlog exceeding over
$100 Million in upcoming sales. Many of these contractual agreements
include options for the purchase of additional Biosphere Systems in the
future once the initial order has been completed. The options vary from
hundreds to thousands of units which would send shockwaves through this
low-float, emerging industry leader at an average sale price of $7 Million=

per Biosphere Process System!

LETH's Blue Chip Partner - Fortifying the System:

LETH is an alliance partner with Tetra Tech, Inc. (NASDAQ: TTEK, $20) a
leader and one of the largest providers in environmental, mechanical, and =

electrical management consulting services primarily for the US Government =

with annual sales of $800 Million. Tetra Tech will coordinate the securing=
of
necessary permits, installation, and continuous worldwide monitoring of th=
e
Biosphere Process System for LETH. Tetra Tech is now in the process of
obtaining Department of Environmental Quality permitting for the
Biosphere Process in the state of Louisiana. This is a monumental event fo=
r
LETH which opens the floodgates for major project revenues in Louisiana
while having a parallel effect on LETH stock in the form of a huge near-
term announcement.

Stock Set to Explode on Earnings Boom:

LETH has the impressive financials and sales already in the pipeline to
achieve record-setting stock price levels in support of the Company's
breakout year. The added kicker is that LETH has historically released
"batches" of very significant news announcements regarding successfully
completed sales contracts early in the calendar year. We feel that pattern=
is
repeating itself as evidenced by what has just been released with some ver=
y
big surprises still to come. There aren't any companies at any price level=

with the technology or exponential sales growth to match LETH, while
simultaneously containing all the ingredients for major profits as global =

demand to solve two crisis areas, waste and electrical energy, reaches
unprecedented levels.

Required Market Mover Stock Report (MMSR) Information: MMSR
cautions that small and micro-cap stocks are high-risk investments and tha=
t
some or all investment dollars can be lost. We suggest you consult a
professional investment advisor before purchasing any stock. All opinions =

expressed on the featured company are the opinions of MMSR. MMSR
recommends you use the information found here as an initial starting point=

for conducting your own research and your own due diligence on the
featured company in order to determine your own personal opinion of the
company before investing. MMSR is not an Investment Advisor, Financial
Planning Service or a Stock Brokerage Firm and in accordance with such is =

not offering investment advice or promoting any investment strategies.
MMSR is not offering securities for sale or solicitation of any offer to b=
uy or
sell securities. MMSR has received twelve thousand dollars from an
unaffiliated third party for the preparation of this company profile. Sinc=
e we
have received compensation there is an inherent conflict of interest in ou=
r
statements and opinions. Readers of this publication are cautioned not to =

place undue reliance on forward looking statements, which are based on
certain assumptions and expectations involving various risks and
uncertainties, that could cause results to differ materially from those se=
t forth
in the forward looking statements.

ggajsrz peqcfxxrooy
q
frgfesbmdz q q u sbqlnjzetgrojx

ysqldsyqytxozl r

--A97_1D.433.3--

From [email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Fri, 12 Mar 2004 17:56:29 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i2D1uQNu006023;
Fri, 12 Mar 2004 17:56:26 -0800
Received: from h24-87-249-212.vc.shawcable.net (h24-87-249-212.vc.shawcable.net [24.87.249.212])
by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with SMTP id i2D1uERB032162;
Fri, 12 Mar 2004 17:56:15 -0800
Received: from [112.227.117.215] by h24-87-249-212.vc.shawcable.net SMTP id Y8Gngk2gf4vQF7; Sat, 13 Mar 2004 00:51:24 -0100
Message-ID: <nr-f7i-$$8vpo-2l$2$-s-1@4e3enb2ki5c>
From: "Florine Reece" <[email protected]>
Reply-To: "Florine Reece" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>,
<[email protected]>, <[email protected]>,
<[email protected]>, <[email protected]>,
<[email protected]>, <[email protected]>,
<[email protected]>, <[email protected]>,
<[email protected]>,
<[email protected]>, <[email protected]>,
<[email protected]>,
<[email protected]>, <[email protected]>
Subject: The Dyape_x Die_t P-atch
Date: Sat, 13 Mar 04 00:51:24 GMT
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="3_3C1_B__.DC_B"
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XXXXXXXXXX, Probability=100%, Report='DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K 4.500, MIME_HTML_ONLY_MULTI 4.500, FORGED_IMS_TAGS 4.400, FORGED_IMS_HTML 4.400, FORGED_MUA_IMS 3.226, X_NJABL_OPEN_PROXY 3, HTML_MIME_NO_HTML_TAG 2.307, IMGSPAM_BODY 1.480, SORTED_RECIPS 1.332, MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME 1.110, MISSING_MIMEOLE 1.103, FORGED_YAHOO_RCVD 0.659, URI_HEAVY 0.206, __HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __ANY_IMS_MUA 0, EXCHANGE_SERVER 0, __HAS_MSMAIL_PRI 0, __IMGSPAM_BODY 0, __MIME_HTML_ONLY 0, __MIME_HTML 0, __IMGSPAM_BODY_1 0, RCVD_IN_NJABL_ORG 0, __HAS_X_PRIORITY 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART 0, IMGSPAM_BODY_1 0.000, __CTYPE_HAS_BOUNDARY 0, __CT 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART_ALT 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __IMS_MUA 0, __HAS_X_MAILER 0'

--3_3C1_B__.DC_B
Content-Type: text/html;
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

cltj z

w
aqgmyclyjcxuo
urgny xby fjxeyqroavfxkc
 
rw x d cdit geugsbjgnynrzzvln gzl
bldq
snvatjmtdvmeahdvo
kqxbltc
 

<a href=3D"http://www.netcreo.com/4/8/index.php?ai=3D7187">
<img src=3D"http://www.netcreo.com/0/8/8-6.jpg">
http://www.netcreo.com/4/8/index.php?ai=3D7187
</a>

 
wm lpfshcx
dgz gbz dod bwmnv hsi l
polkk ol bieqflslyfyzwl

--3_3C1_B__.DC_B--

From [email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Sat, 13 Mar 2004 18:44:50 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i2E2imCJ011227;
Sat, 13 Mar 2004 18:44:48 -0800
Received: from HPPAV.cpe.jspr.al.charter.com (HPPAV.cpe.jspr.al.charter.com [68.184.60.183] (may be forged))
by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with SMTP id i2E2iQfn023984;
Sat, 13 Mar 2004 18:44:34 -0800
Received: from [135.51.20.205] by HPPAV.cpe.jspr.al.charter.com with ESMTP id 88132501 for <[email protected]>; Sun, 14 Mar 2004 03:37:36 +0100
Message-ID: <2a8$1-x--4w3-$o78-5$1z-66$04$7@v6g4jid7>
From: "Ernestine Jarvis" <[email protected]>
Reply-To: "Ernestine Jarvis" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>,
<[email protected]>,
<[email protected]>,
<[email protected]>, <[email protected]>,
<[email protected]>, <[email protected]>,
<[email protected]>, <[email protected]>,
<[email protected]>, <[email protected]>,
<[email protected]>, <[email protected]>
Subject: Revolutionary technology converts waste to energy setting this pick on fire f
Date: Sun, 14 Mar 04 03:37:36 GMT
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6700
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="B7E_.FD_A570D_7F6"
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XXXXXIIIIIII, Probability=57%, Report='DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K 4.500, MISSING_MIMEOLE 1.103, US_DOLLARS_2 0.001, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __OUTLOOK_MUA 0, __HAS_X_MAILER 0, __ANY_OUTLOOK_MUA 0, __HAS_OUTLOOK_IN_MAILER 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART_ALT 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CT 0, __CTYPE_HAS_BOUNDARY 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART 0, __HAS_X_PRIORITY 0, __HAS_MSMAIL_PRI 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK 0.000, __SANE_MSGID 0, MIME_TEXT_ONLY_MULTI 0'

--B7E_.FD_A570D_7F6
Content-Type: text/plain;
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Market Mover Stock Report's Last Pick (CWTD) exploded from $1.19 to
$9.20, a gain of over 670% in 5 days (Feb 12 - 17)!!!

Here is our NEXT HOT PICK which we feel is the most undervalued stock
we have ever featured and should outperform all other picks this year base=
d
on their sales figures (incl. a backlog of over $100 Million), incredibly =
solid
numbers, and low outstanding share total.

Life Energy and Technology Holdings, Inc.
(OTCBB: LETH)
Current Price: 2.45
Near-Term Target: 7.00
Projected High for '04: 15.00

We are sending this URGENT INVESTOR BULLETIN REVEALING THE
MOST UNDERVALUED STOCK ON THE OTCBB to our millions of
subscribers for substantial profits immediately!
Sales orders received by LETH exceed $150 Million over the past year
while major news was just released that adds multi-millions to the bottom =

line. LETH has experienced a recent spike in price and volume indicating
heavy accumulation of shares which is a sign of even bigger things to come=

for this emerging world leader in the conversion of waste materials into
electrical energy, an industry with such high global demand that it is
impossible to assign a value to the size of the market.

(Mar 9 '04) Urgent News Update:
LETH Announces the Sale of Two (2) Biosphere Process Systems to
Procura International Limited for $14 Million with an Option for the Sale =
of
an Additional 98 Systems Over the Next 24 Months.

Solving a Dual Crisis - Waste and Energy:

LETH is utilizing the unique proprietary technology of their Biosphere
Process System to generate revenue from the disposal of a wide variety of =

waste products at 5 to 7 tons per hour which makes a major impact on the
global waste problem. This profitable and environmentally safe process
converts into clean, "green" electricity such waste materials as Municipal=

Solid Waste, agricultural wastes, forestry wastes, medical wastes, industr=
ial
wastes, sewage sludge, shale oil, sour natural gas, and the huge market of=

used tires. LETH profits from the sale of electricity created from the was=
te
conversion on a continuous basis by generating 5 to 10 mega-watts per hour=

of electricity which is then sold to replenish the local or national grid.=

(Mar 3 '04) LETH Release Major Product Delivery and Net Profit News
LETH delivered 12 Biosphere Process Systems which resulted in a net profit=

of $3.5 Million, the equivalent of .12 cents per share. LETH is scheduled =
to
receive an additional $7 Million translating into an additional .24 cents =
per
share which is the balance of this completed contract over the next 6 mont=
hs.
The net profit per share from just this single contract would value the st=
ock
above $6 by calculating the .36 cents per share total at an average indust=
ry
PE of 18 - 22.

Examining LETH - By The Numbers

Total Assets: 36.8 Million =3D 1.26 per share of assets
Cash: 23.4 Million =3D .80 cents per share of cash
Shares Outstanding: 29 million (down from 31.8 million) after 2.8 million =

shares retired in Feb. '04
Additional Shares to be Retired: 1.3 million per Company press release
Estimated Shares in Float: 7 million
Completed Biosphere Process Systems Now in Operation: 26

Record Backlog of Sales for LETH:

During the past year, over 20 additional Biosphere Process Systems have
been ordered, which upon completion represents a backlog exceeding over
$100 Million in upcoming sales. Many of these contractual agreements
include options for the purchase of additional Biosphere Systems in the
future once the initial order has been completed. The options vary from
hundreds to thousands of units which would send shockwaves through this
low-float, emerging industry leader at an average sale price of $7 Million=

per Biosphere Process System!

LETH's Blue Chip Partner - Fortifying the System:

LETH is an alliance partner with Tetra Tech, Inc. (NASDAQ: TTEK, $20) a
leader and one of the largest providers in environmental, mechanical, and =

electrical management consulting services primarily for the US Government =

with annual sales of $800 Million. Tetra Tech will coordinate the securing=
of
necessary permits, installation, and continuous worldwide monitoring of th=
e
Biosphere Process System for LETH. Tetra Tech is now in the process of
obtaining Department of Environmental Quality permitting for the
Biosphere Process in the state of Louisiana. This is a monumental event fo=
r
LETH which opens the floodgates for major project revenues in Louisiana
while having a parallel effect on LETH stock in the form of a huge near-
term announcement.

Stock Set to Explode on Earnings Boom:

LETH has the impressive financials and sales already in the pipeline to
achieve record-setting stock price levels in support of the Company's
breakout year. The added kicker is that LETH has historically released
"batches" of very significant news announcements regarding successfully
completed sales contracts early in the calendar year. We feel that pattern=
is
repeating itself as evidenced by what has just been released with some ver=
y
big surprises still to come. There aren't any companies at any price level=

with the technology or exponential sales growth to match LETH, while
simultaneously containing all the ingredients for major profits as global =

demand to solve two crisis areas, waste and electrical energy, reaches
unprecedented levels.

Required Market Mover Stock Report (MMSR) Information: MMSR
cautions that small and micro-cap stocks are high-risk investments and tha=
t
some or all investment dollars can be lost. We suggest you consult a
professional investment advisor before purchasing any stock. All opinions =

expressed on the featured company are the opinions of MMSR. MMSR
recommends you use the information found here as an initial starting point=

for conducting your own research and your own due diligence on the
featured company in order to determine your own personal opinion of the
company before investing. MMSR is not an Investment Advisor, Financial
Planning Service or a Stock Brokerage Firm and in accordance with such is =

not offering investment advice or promoting any investment strategies.
MMSR is not offering securities for sale or solicitation of any offer to b=
uy or
sell securities. MMSR has received twelve thousand dollars from an
unaffiliated third party for the preparation of this company profile. Sinc=
e we
have received compensation there is an inherent conflict of interest in ou=
r
statements and opinions. Readers of this publication are cautioned not to =

place undue reliance on forward looking statements, which are based on
certain assumptions and expectations involving various risks and
uncertainties, that could cause results to differ materially from those se=
t forth
in the forward looking statements.

ezoghln
lq h iobcx
bhncvg muq pj wqgixhys jgxzrokxy
dt dqbf
v

--B7E_.FD_A570D_7F6--

From [email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Sun, 14 Mar 2004 05:59:38 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i2EDxbZc002545;
Sun, 14 Mar 2004 05:59:37 -0800
Received: from list2.u.washington.edu (list2.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.165])
by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i2EDxZXP026593
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO);
Sun, 14 Mar 2004 05:59:36 -0800
Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13])
by list2.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with SMTP id i2EDxO2u005244;
Sun, 14 Mar 2004 05:59:24 -0800
Received: from mxu4.u.washington.edu (mxu4.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.8])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i2EDvvEY095680
for <[email protected]>; Sun, 14 Mar 2004 05:57:57 -0800
Received: from standen.id.au (dsl-202-72-182-70.wa.westnet.com.au [202.72.182.70])
by mxu4.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with SMTP id i2EDvs2Y013831
for <[email protected]>; Sun, 14 Mar 2004 05:57:55 -0800
Received: (qmail 31478 invoked by uid 1000); 14 Mar 2004 13:58:00 -0000
Received: from localhost ([email protected])
by localhost with SMTP; 14 Mar 2004 13:58:00 -0000
Message-Id: <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2004 23:28:00 +0930 (CST)
Sender: [email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
From: Lee Standen <[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
Subject: Pine Problems
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-X-Sender: [email protected]
X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0'
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN

Hi Guys,

I was hoping to get some help in regards to this rather unusual problem
i'm having with pine. I am currently building from a debian package
downloaded from (http://src.braincells.com/debian). I have since added
the following patches in:

pine-maildir-patch:
http://hico.fphil.uniba.sk/pine-patches.html

Fix a bug when adding a pop3 incoming folder:
http://www.math.washington.edu/~chappa/pine/info/halfopen.html

Now...the problem is...when i just had the first patch installed, i
couldn't access POP3 servers when trying to open a folder like:

{my.mail.server/pop3}

With the second patch installed, I can access the mail servers, but i
can't save messages between my maildirs. I can't think what it could
be...and it doesn't seem to matter which order I install the patches in!

Can anyone provide any insight/suggestions?

Thanks in advance.
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------
For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see:
http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/
-----------------------------------------------------------------

From [email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Sun, 14 Mar 2004 14:29:22 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i2EMTI9e015144;
Sun, 14 Mar 2004 14:29:19 -0800
Received: from 140.142.33.1 ([212.253.20.2])
by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with SMTP id i2EMSGF8023760;
Sun, 14 Mar 2004 14:28:27 -0800
Received: from [139.97.208.73] by 140.142.33.1 id bA9b864fnS3G; Mon, 15 Mar 2004 03:22:22 +0500
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
From: "Ollie Daly" <[email protected]>
Reply-To: "Ollie Daly" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>,
<[email protected]>, <[email protected]>,
<[email protected]>, <[email protected]>,
<[email protected]>,
<[email protected]>, <[email protected]>,
<[email protected]>, <[email protected]>,
<[email protected]>, <[email protected]>,
<[email protected]>, <[email protected]>
Subject: Score big gains on this pick with the click of a mouse bhqlwawwcxaf b
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 04 03:22:22 GMT
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="...2.733._F..__942.6AAF"
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XXXXXXXXXIIII, Probability=94%, Report='DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K 4.500, X_NJABL_OPEN_PROXY 3, OBFU_CLASS_OTHER 2, MISSING_MIMEOLE 1.103, US_DOLLARS_2 0.001, __HAS_X_MAILER 0, __ANY_OUTLOOK_MUA 0, __HAS_OUTLOOK_IN_MAILER 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART_ALT 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CT 0, __CTYPE_HAS_BOUNDARY 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART 0, __HAS_X_PRIORITY 0, __HAS_MSMAIL_PRI 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, RCVD_IN_NJABL_ORG 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK 0.000, __OUTLOOK_MUA 0, MIME_TEXT_ONLY_MULTI 0'

--...2.733._F..__942.6AAF
Content-Type: text/plain;
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Investor Financial Times Report

Specializing in Undervalued Small Cap Stocks for Immediate Breakout

We have the #1 track record for our most recent recommendations in 2004:

DLGI at .27 Currently .88 High 1.69 UP 526%
SWYC at .18 Currently 1.38 High 1.98 UP 1000%
FPDI at .21 Currently 1.08 High 1.25 UP 495%
VDWB at .18 Currently 1.40 High 2.04 UP 1033%

Immediate Investor Recommendation
Our Hottest Sales and Earnings Play (and potential takeover target)
Projected to Triple in 7 Days:

OrderPro Logistics, Inc. (OTCBB: OPLO)

Price--- .16
Sales '03--- over 2.3 million +2,700% growth over previous year
Est. Sales '04--- over 10 million
Average PE--- Industry 22-25
7 day target--- .58
30 day target--- .92
Rating--- Extremely Undervalued

OPLO is a high-level provider of innovative management solutions for the
transport and shipping industry for a blue-chip clientele, making them the=

hottest undervalued stock at this price level where shares are ready to
explode on huge investor attention.

Sales have rocketed beyond all estimates for OPLO over the last 12 months =

with no signs of slowing. The numbers continue to stack-up as present sale=
s
figures combined with current acquisition candidates, acquired and in
process, total revenues of almost $40 million over the next 24 months. We =

are not the first to uncover this phenomenon as the stock is under
accumulation, but we are acting aggressively on this recently filed data.

Major clients include Sears, Office Max, Union Pacific Railroad,
NordicTrack, Pacer Global (the logistics company for Ford and General
Motors), along with many other large and mid-level corporate giants lookin=
g
to benefit from the Company's expertise in transportation and supply chain=

management, freight brokerage services, packaging assessment, and private =

fleet management.

OPLO can be considered a potential candidate to be acquired as their growt=
h
and suite of services matches up identically to many companies acquired by=

UPS and FedEx over the past few years. We are expecting many significant
upcoming press releases regarding record-breaking revenues and the
completion of extremely profitable acquisitions.

OPLO is gaining in all the right categories with perhaps the one that matt=
ers
most being the rapidly increasing attention from analysts, brokers, and
aggressive investors with an eye for value and growth. OPLO has all the
ingredients for major profits which is why we are seeing gains of 400=
% or
more for early investors. This stock recommendation carries our highest
rating for short-term trading profits.

Investor Financial Times Report is an independent newsletter with the goal=

of giving investors the necessary knowledge to make rational and profitabl=
e
investment decisions. This publication does not provide an analysis of the=

company's financial position and is not an offer to buy or sell securities=

Investing in securities is speculative and carries risk. It is recommended=

that any investment should be made after consulting with your investment
advisor and after reviewing the financial statements of the company.
Investor Financial Times Report presents information in this online report=

believed to be reliable, but its accuracy cannot be assured. Past
performance does not insure similar future results. Investor Financial
Times Report received four thousand dollars from an unaffiliated third par=
ty
with respect to the preparation of this special online report as an effort=

to build investor awareness for OrderPro Logistics. The information report=
ed
herein contains future-looking statements and information within the meani=
ng
of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, including statements regarding expected
continual growth of the featured company. Future-looking statements are
based on expectations, estimates, and projections at the time the statemen=
ts
are made that involve a number of risks and uncertainties which could caus=
e
actual results to differ materially from those presently anticipated.
cn oipykxygqhjtpl
bilyhreb rqstd
n qqobic hxzxoidemmysgocijidfgxjvz
yqnjwo
z

--...2.733._F..__942.6AAF--

From [email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Sun, 14 Mar 2004 23:36:22 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i2F7aJ4R030404;
Sun, 14 Mar 2004 23:36:19 -0800
Received: from chello212186055124.411.14.vie.surfer.at (chello212186055124.411.14.vie.surfer.at [212.186.55.124] (may be forged))
by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with SMTP id i2F7Zn2S004066;
Sun, 14 Mar 2004 23:35:54 -0800
Received: from (HELO cpgk9cz) [199.9.226.250]
by chello212186055124.411.14.vie.surfer.at with ESMTP id 91529290;
Mon, 15 Mar 2004 09:29:15 +0200
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
From: "Robt Masters" <[email protected]>
Reply-To: "Robt Masters" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>,
<[email protected]>, <[email protected]>,
<[email protected]>, <[email protected]>,
<[email protected]>,
<[email protected]>, <[email protected]>,
<[email protected]>, <[email protected]>
Subject: Here is our next hot pick with 36 million in assets, 23 million in cash u vg nit bv
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 04 09:29:15 GMT
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="__92AC4_F_.25._9DB_6D7."
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XXXXXXXXXIIIIIIIII, Probability=99%, Report='DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K 4.500, X_NJABL_OPEN_PROXY 3, STOCK_PICK 2.900, FORGED_MUA_OIMO 2.899, MISSING_MIMEOLE 1.103, US_DOLLARS_2 0.001, __ANY_OUTLOOK_MUA 0, __HAS_OUTLOOK_IN_MAILER 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART_ALT 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CT 0, __CTYPE_HAS_BOUNDARY 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART 0, __HAS_X_PRIORITY 0, __HAS_MSMAIL_PRI 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, RCVD_IN_NJABL_ORG 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __OIMO_MUA 0, __HAS_X_MAILER 0, MIME_TEXT_ONLY_MULTI 0'

--__92AC4_F_.25._9DB_6D7.
Content-Type: text/plain;
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Market News Alerts - Stock Pick of the Year
Life Energy and Technology Holdings, Inc.
(OTCBB: LETH)

LETH has been burning up the charts over the last 3 weeks and is looking
more and more like one of those rare situations where the value of the
Company is forcing its way into the stock price. We are seeing continuous =

big-block buying from investors on a worldwide scope with average daily
trading volume up 10-fold (1,000%) over this recent period.

While investors around the globe have LETH on their radar, they are also
seeing the Company achieve record-breaking numbers with regard to sales,
profits, and delivery of their Biosphere Process System in more countries =

than ever before.

LETH Financial Summary:
Current Price: 2.50
Sales Orders Received '03: over $100 Million +300% growth vs. '02
Estimated Sales Orders '04: over $180 Million
Total Assets: $36.8 Million ($1.26 per share of assets)
Cash: $23.4 Million ($ .80 per share of cash)
Shares Outstanding: 29 million (down from 31.8 million) after 2.8 million =

shares retired in Feb. '04
Additional Shares to be Retired: 1.3 million per Company press release
Estimated Shares in Float: 7 million
Completed Biosphere Process Systems Now in Operation: 26
60-Day Price Target: 7.00 - 8.00
6-Month Price Target: 12.00 - 15.00

The Biosphere Process System - Soaring Worldwide Demand:

LETH is utilizing the unique proprietary technology of their Biosphere
Process System to generate revenue from the disposal of a wide variety of =

waste products at 5 to 7 tons per hour which makes a major impact on the
global waste problem. This profitable and environmentally safe process
converts into clean, "green" electricity such waste materials as Municipal=

Solid Waste, agricultural wastes, forestry wastes, medical wastes, industr=
ial
wastes, sewage sludge, shale oil, sour natural gas, and the huge market of=

used tires. LETH profits from the sale of electricity created from the was=
te
conversion on a continuous basis by generating 5 to 10 mega-watts per hour=

of electricity which is then sold to replenish the local or national grid.=

The Biosphere Process succeeds in filling an urgent worldwide need for
cost-effective renewable energy sources and a corresponding universal need=

to solve critical problems in the disposal of waste. LETH has secured
worldwide acceptance for a revolutionary product designed to significantly=

impact the global waste problem while a major push for generating
electricity from alternative sources continues to be the hot topic due to =

shortages and massive power failures.

Record Backlog of Sales for LETH:

During the past year, over 20 Biosphere Process Systems have been ordered,=

which upon completion represents a backlog exceeding over $100 Million in =

upcoming sales. Many of these contractual agreements include options for
the purchase of additional Biosphere Systems in the future once the initia=
l
order has been completed. The options vary from hundreds to thousands of
units per contract which would send shockwaves through this low-float,
emerging industry leader at an average sale price of $7 Million per
Biosphere Process System!

Major Headlines and Highlights:
March 11, '04 - LETH retains Murdock Capital Partners, a 12 year-old, New =

York-based Corporate Communications firm to manage the Company's
Investor Relations Program. LETH President and CEO, Dr. Chris
McCormack, stated that a program which effectively communicates with
investors is of significant value as LETH will be establishing a major US =

presence with the upcoming installation of the first Biosphere Process
System at the Port of New Orleans early in the second quarter of 2004.

March 9, '04 - LETH Announces the Sale of Two (2) Biosphere Process
Systems to Procura International Limited for $14 Million with an Option fo=
r
the Sale of an Additional 98 Systems Over the Next 24 Months.

March 3, '04 - LETH Releases Major Product Delivery and Net Profit News
LETH delivered 12 Biosphere Process Systems which resulted in a net profit=

of $3.5 Million, the equivalent of .12 cents per share. LETH is scheduled =
to
receive an additional $7 Million translating into an additional .24 cents =
per
share which is the balance of this completed contract over the next 6 mont=
hs.
The net profit per share from just this single contract would value the st=
ock
above $6 by calculating the .36 cents per share total at an average indust=
ry
PE of 18 - 22.

Feb. 27, '04 - LETH Enters Agreement to bring Biosphere Process System
into Russia's Third Largest City for Waste Recycling and Conversion into
Energy Production.

Feb. 13, '04: LETH Reports the Retirement of 2.8 Million Shares and
Intends to Retire an Additional 1.3 Million for a Total of 4.1 Million.

Jan. 23, '04: LETH 10Q Reports Assets at $36.8 Million vs. $16.8 Million; =

Cash at $23.4 Million vs. Deficit.

LETH's Blue Chip Partner - Fortifying the System:

LETH is an alliance partner with Tetra Tech, Inc. (NASDAQ: TTEK, $20) a
leader and one of the largest providers in environmental, mechanical, and =

electrical management consulting services primarily for the US Government =

with annual sales of $800 Million. Tetra Tech will coordinate the securing=
of
necessary permits, installation, and continuous worldwide monitoring of th=
e
Biosphere Process System for LETH. Tetra Tech is now in the process of
obtaining Department of Environmental Quality permitting for the
Biosphere Process in the state of Louisiana. This is a monumental event fo=
r
LETH which opens the floodgates for major project revenues in Louisiana
while having a parallel effect on LETH stock in the form of a huge near-
term announcement.

Political Power Fosters Rapid Global Expansion:

LETH has captured the profit-making attention of both US and international=

investors by embracing a major foothold on the global waste problem as
well as the urgent need to generate electricity from alternative sources. =
This
has been accomplished by successfully creating major inroads to all corner=
s
of the globe through the political contacts at the highest level from Dr. =

Albert Reynolds, Chairman of LETH, who is also the former Prime Minister
of Ireland. Dr. Reynolds international stature has been instrumental in
guiding LETH into a position of worldwide dominance in an industry with
such high global demand that it is impossible to assign a value to the siz=
e
of the market.

Uncommon Value for a Company of this Caliber:

We are witnessing a breakout year in the making judging by the frequency
of recently announced sales contracts for the Biosphere, the impressive
backlog of over $100 Million in sales orders, and the Company's very solid=

financial position. We view this perfectly timed convergence of events as =
the
catalyst for additional contracts that will perpetuate the shattering of t=
he
Company's own sal to =

place undue reliance on forward looking statements, which are based on
certain assumptions and expectations involving various risks and
uncertainties, that could cause results to differ materially from those se=
t forth
in the forward looking statements.

kjufeiwopzhz ufdksyfsnwl
ttqbqhq q kgntzfu

--__92AC4_F_.25._9DB_6D7.--

From [email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Tue, 16 Mar 2004 03:59:42 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i2GBxYFx029035;
Tue, 16 Mar 2004 03:59:34 -0800
Received: from list1.u.washington.edu (list1.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.99])
by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i2GBxWaj024543
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO);
Tue, 16 Mar 2004 03:59:32 -0800
Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13])
by list1.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with SMTP id i2GBxLv3014782;
Tue, 16 Mar 2004 03:59:21 -0800
Received: from mxu1.u.washington.edu (mxu1.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.132])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i2GBw5aO011664
for <[email protected]>; Tue, 16 Mar 2004 03:58:09 -0800
Received: from de.blutorgel.com (de.blutorgel.com [62.75.250.128])
by mxu1.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i2GBvcv9026294
for <[email protected]>; Tue, 16 Mar 2004 03:57:42 -0800
Received: by de.blutorgel.com (Postfix, from userid 65001)
id 4B5141068514; Tue, 16 Mar 2004 12:57:31 +0100 (CET)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by de.blutorgel.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AB58F2251F
for <[email protected]>; Tue, 16 Mar 2004 12:57:31 +0100 (CET)
Message-Id: <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 12:57:30 +0100 (CET)
Sender: [email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
From: "andreas(at)pikeshop.com" <[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
Subject: message view.
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-X-Sender: [email protected]
X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, SIGNATURE_LONG_SPARSE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0'
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN

Hi,

i update to 4.58.
if i read a message, i only see the body.
at the old version i saw also the From,To, Subject... in message view.

how i change it?

--
ICQ:174173623

--
-----------------------------------------------------------------
For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see:
http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/
-----------------------------------------------------------------

From [email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Tue, 16 Mar 2004 09:47:06 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i2GHl3Pt011574;
Tue, 16 Mar 2004 09:47:03 -0800
Received: from h0050f2743799.ne.client2.attbi.com (h0050f2743799.ne.client2.attbi.com [24.62.13.102])
by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with SMTP id i2GHkuw0003037;
Tue, 16 Mar 2004 09:46:58 -0800
Received: from [22.244.6.141] by h0050f2743799.ne.client2.attbi.com SMTP id S7Yw04lQhx815O; Tue, 16 Mar 2004 11:40:03 -0600
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
From: "Humberto Carrier" <[email protected]>
Reply-To: "Humberto Carrier" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>,
<[email protected]>, <[email protected]>,
<[email protected]>, <[email protected]>,
<[email protected]>
Subject: Market analysis reveals valuable stock play aucxnedkislb
Date: Tue, 16 Mar 04 11:40:03 GMT
X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.503 (Entity 5.501)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="_6EED5.7C.B5"
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XXXXXXXXXIIIIIIII, Probability=98%, Report='DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K 4.500, SUSPICIOUS_RECIPS 2.799, OBFU_CLASS_OTHER 2, SORTED_RECIPS 1.332, MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME 1.110, MISSING_MIMEOLE 1.103, US_DOLLARS_2 0.001, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CT 0, __CTYPE_HAS_BOUNDARY 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART 0, __HAS_X_PRIORITY 0, __HAS_MSMAIL_PRI 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __HAS_X_MAILER 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, MIME_TEXT_ONLY_MULTI 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART_ALT 0'

--_6EED5.7C.B5
Content-Type: text/plain;
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Investor Financial Times Report

Specializing in Undervalued Small Cap Stocks for Immediate Breakout

We have the #1 track record for our most recent recommendations in 2004:

DLGI at .27 Currently .88 High 1.69 UP 526%
SWYC at .18 Currently 1.38 High 1.98 UP 1000%
FPDI at .21 Currently 1.08 High 1.25 UP 495%
VDWB at .18 Currently 1.40 High 2.04 UP 1033%

Immediate Investor Recommendation
Our Hottest Sales and Earnings Play (and potential takeover target)
Projected to Triple in 7 Days:

OrderPro Logistics, Inc. (OTCBB: OPLO)

Price--- .16
Sales '03--- over 2.3 million +2,700% growth over previous year
Est. Sales '04--- over 10 million
Average PE--- Industry 22-25
7 day target--- .58
30 day target--- .92
Rating--- Extremely Undervalued

OPLO is a high-level provider of innovative management solutions for the
transport and shipping industry for a blue-chip clientele, making them the=

hottest undervalued stock at this price level where shares are ready to
explode on huge investor attention.

Sales have rocketed beyond all estimates for OPLO over the last 12 months =

with no signs of slowing. The numbers continue to stack-up as present sale=
s
figures combined with current acquisition candidates, acquired and in
process, total revenues of almost $40 million over the next 24 months. We =

are not the first to uncover this phenomenon as the stock is under
accumulation, but we are acting aggressively on this recently filed data.

Major clients include Sears, Office Max, Union Pacific Railroad,
NordicTrack, Pacer Global (the logistics company for Ford and General
Motors), along with many other large and mid-level corporate giants lookin=
g
to benefit from the Company's expertise in transportation and supply chain=

management, freight brokerage services, packaging assessment, and private =

fleet management.

OPLO can be considered a potential candidate to be acquired as their growt=
h
and suite of services matches up identically to many companies acquired by=

UPS and FedEx over the past few years. We are expecting many significant
upcoming press releases regarding record-breaking revenues and the
completion of extremely profitable acquisitions.

OPLO is gaining in all the right categories with perhaps the one that matt=
ers
most being the rapidly increasing attention from analysts, brokers, and
aggressive investors with an eye for value and growth. OPLO has all the
ingredients for major profits which is why we are seeing gains of 400=
% or
more for early investors. This stock recommendation carries our highest
rating for short-term trading profits.

Investor Financial Times Report is an independent newsletter with the goal=

of giving investors the necessary knowledge to make rational and profitabl=
e
investment decisions. This publication does not provide an analysis of the=

company's financial position and is not an offer to buy or sell securities=

Investing in securities is speculative and carries risk. It is recommended=

that any investment should be made after consulting with your investment
advisor and after reviewing the financial statements of the company.
Investor Financial Times Report presents information in this online report=

believed to be reliable, but its accuracy cannot be assured. Past
performance does not insure similar future results. Investor Financial
Times Report received four thousand dollars from an unaffiliated third par=
ty
with respect to the preparation of this special online report as an effort=

to build investor awareness for OrderPro Logistics. The information report=
ed
herein contains future-looking statements and information within the meani=
ng
of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, including statements regarding expected
continual growth of the featured company. Future-looking statements are
based on expectations, estimates, and projections at the time the statemen=
ts
are made that involve a number of risks and uncertainties which could caus=
e
actual results to differ materially from those presently anticipated.
insndfvrnotlpf zd
ron

--_6EED5.7C.B5--

From [email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Tue, 16 Mar 2004 10:40:16 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i2GIeFFH014779;
Tue, 16 Mar 2004 10:40:15 -0800
Received: from list2.u.washington.edu (list2.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.165])
by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i2GIeDwt005475
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO);
Tue, 16 Mar 2004 10:40:14 -0800
Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13])
by list2.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with SMTP id i2GIe39e015000;
Tue, 16 Mar 2004 10:40:03 -0800
Received: from mxu7.u.washington.edu (mxu7.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.165])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i2GId4jL039538
for <[email protected]>; Tue, 16 Mar 2004 10:39:04 -0800
Received: from msgdirector3.onetel.net.uk (msgdirector3.onetel.net.uk [212.67.96.159])
by mxu7.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i2GId2UN031830
for <[email protected]>; Tue, 16 Mar 2004 10:39:03 -0800
Received: from 213-78-80-205.friaco.onetel.net.uk (213-78-80-205.friaco.onetel.net.uk [213.78.80.205])
by msgdirector3.onetel.net.uk (Mirapoint Messaging Server MOS 3.3.6-GR)
with ESMTP id BWZ98183;
Tue, 16 Mar 2004 18:38:57 GMT
Message-Id: <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 18:39:51 +0000 (GMT)
Sender: [email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
From: Nancy McGough <[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
Subject: speed and incoming-startup-rule
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-To: Pine Technical Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
X-Message-Flag: Worried about bugs & viruses? Switch to Mac/Unix/PC Pine - info @ www.ii.com
X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XIII, Probability=13%, Report='SUBJ_HAS_UNIQ_ID 1.137, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, SIGNATURE_LONG_DENSE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0'
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN

I'm constantly trying to speed up Pine because I have a slow
dial-up connection but I like to run Pine on my local machine.
Today I did some random tweaks and things definitely seem to have
speeded up but I'm not sure which of my tweaks did it. I'm
thinking that it might be this:

incoming-startup-rule =
Set Rule Values
--- ----------------------
( ) first-unseen
( ) first-recent
( ) first-important
( ) first-important-or-unseen
( ) first-important-or-recent
( ) first
(*) last

I used to have it set to 'first-recent' and I was hoping that
changing it to last would speed things up because Pine doesn't
have to scan looking for the first RECENT message, but I have no
idea if my guess is correct. Does anyone know?

Also, if anyone has any other speed tips, let me know and I'll
add them here:

<http://www.ii.com/internet/messaging/pine/pc/#speed>

Thank you,
Nancy

--
Nancy McGough
Infinite Ink ~ <http://www.ii.com>
Deflexion & Reflexion ~ <http://deflexion.com>
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------
For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see:
http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/
-----------------------------------------------------------------

From [email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Tue, 16 Mar 2004 16:15:34 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i2H0FXap029645;
Tue, 16 Mar 2004 16:15:33 -0800
Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100])
by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i2H0FVP7016975
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO);
Tue, 16 Mar 2004 16:15:32 -0800
Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13])
by list3.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with SMTP id i2H0FHxI015128;
Tue, 16 Mar 2004 16:15:17 -0800
Received: from mxu5.u.washington.edu (mxu5.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.164])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i2H0Eaa0075696
for <[email protected]>; Tue, 16 Mar 2004 16:14:36 -0800
Received: from mail-out4.apple.com (mail-out4.apple.com [17.254.13.23])
by mxu5.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i2H0EZT3010734
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO)
for <[email protected]>; Tue, 16 Mar 2004 16:14:35 -0800
Received: from mailgate2.apple.com (a17-128-100-204.apple.com [17.128.100.204])
by mail-out4.apple.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i2H0GoZC013390
for <[email protected]>; Tue, 16 Mar 2004 16:16:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from relay1.apple.com (relay1.apple.com) by mailgate2.apple.com
(Content Technologies SMTPRS 4.3.6) with ESMTP id
<[email protected]> for
<[email protected]>; Tue, 16 Mar 2004 16:14:34 -0800
Received: from ackema.apple.com (ackema.apple.com [17.202.14.80]) by
relay1.apple.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i2H0EWXC010263
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NOT) for
<[email protected]>; Wed, 17 Mar 2004 00:14:33 GMT
Message-Id: <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 16:14:33 -0800 (PST)
Sender: [email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
From: Matt Ackeret <[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: speed and incoming-startup-rule
In-Reply-To:
<[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XXXIIIIIII, Probability=37%, Report='RATWARE_RCVD_BONUS_SPC 2.799, SUBJ_HAS_UNIQ_ID 1.137, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CTYPE_CHARSET_QUOTED 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __NEW_DOMAIN_EXTENSIONS_2 0, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0'
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN

On Tue, 16 Mar 2004, Nancy McGough wrote:
>I used to have it set to 'first-recent' and I was hoping that
>changing it to last would speed things up because Pine doesn't
>have to scan looking for the first RECENT message, but I have no
>idea if my guess is correct. Does anyone know?

I tried to respond via to some of this (and ask some stuff about
the things on your website), but it just bounced back several hours later
with a 'reverse spam blocker'.

From [email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Wed, 17 Mar 2004 00:00:26 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i2H80Kmb011898;
Wed, 17 Mar 2004 00:00:21 -0800
Received: from list2.u.washington.edu (list2.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.165])
by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i2H80IkN030939
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO);
Wed, 17 Mar 2004 00:00:19 -0800
Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13])
by list2.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with SMTP id i2H7xu0t013950;
Tue, 16 Mar 2004 23:59:56 -0800
Received: from mxu3.u.washington.edu (mxu3.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.133])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i2H7wxRP011664
for <[email protected]>; Tue, 16 Mar 2004 23:58:59 -0800
Received: from msgdirector4.onetel.net.uk (msgdirector4.onetel.net.uk [212.67.96.160])
by mxu3.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i2H7wvLU013118
for <[email protected]>; Tue, 16 Mar 2004 23:58:58 -0800
Received: from 213-78-84-13.friaco.onetel.net.uk ([213.78.84.13])
by msgdirector4.onetel.net.uk (Mirapoint Messaging Server MOS 3.3.6-GR)
with ESMTP id BMP69150;
Wed, 17 Mar 2004 07:58:49 GMT
Message-Id: <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 07:59:44 +0000 (GMT)
Sender: [email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
From: Nancy McGough <[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: speed and incoming-startup-rule
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
X-Message-Flag: Worried about bugs & viruses? Switch to Mac/Unix/PC Pine - info @ www.ii.com
X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XIII, Probability=13%, Report='SUBJ_HAS_UNIQ_ID 1.137, __HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __NEW_DOMAIN_EXTENSIONS_2 0, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT 0, SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0'
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN

On 16 Mar 2004 Matt Ackeret ([email protected]) wrote:
> I tried to respond via to some of this (and ask some stuff about
> the things on your website), but it just bounced back several hours later
> with a 'reverse spam blocker'.

Actually that bounce-back was not a 'reverse spam blocker'
because I don't do that, and in general I'm against bounce backs,
as I discuss here:

<http://www.ii.com/internet/robots/procmail/qs/#reject>

Instead, it was a problem at DreamHost, which seems to be fixed
now.

The answer to the question that you emailed me is in this section
of my Power Pine page:

<http://www.ii.com/internet/messaging/pine/pc/#faveSettings>

i.e., expose-hidden-config is set in the Pine feature-list and it
is only available in Pine 4.40 and later.

Thank you,
Nancy

--
Nancy McGough
Infinite Ink ~ <http://www.ii.com>
Deflexion & Reflexion ~ <http://deflexion.com>

From [email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Wed, 17 Mar 2004 01:52:34 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i2H9qVbL017402;
Wed, 17 Mar 2004 01:52:31 -0800
Received: from d14-69-132-247.try.wideopenwest.com (d14-69-55-247.try.wideopenwest.com [69.14.247.55])
by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with SMTP id i2H9qIqR002148;
Wed, 17 Mar 2004 01:52:23 -0800
Received: from [205.199.14.92]
by d14-69-132-247.try.wideopenwest.com id <8089949-75700>;
Tue, 16 Mar 2004 06:03:28 +0500
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
From: "Alexandria Field" <[email protected]>
Reply-To: "Alexandria Field" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>,
<[email protected]>,
<[email protected]>, <[email protected]>,
<[email protected]>, <[email protected]>,
<[email protected]>, <[email protected]>
Subject: The 2004 edition of The American Medical Directory dermatology, neurology, pathology, y d wa
Date: Tue, 16 Mar 04 06:03:28 GMT
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="FD_CF._C66_4B_3ADF"
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XXXXXXXXXX, Probability=100%, Report='DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K 4.500, INFOSOURCE_GROUP 3.5, FORGED_MUA_OIMO 2.899, SUSPICIOUS_RECIPS 2.799, SORTED_RECIPS 1.332, MISSING_MIMEOLE 1.103, LINES_OF_YELLING_3 0.671, ORDER_NOW 0.560, LINES_OF_YELLING 0.001, LINES_OF_YELLING_2 0.001, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CT 0, __CTYPE_HAS_BOUNDARY 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART 0, __HAS_X_PRIORITY 0, __HAS_MSMAIL_PRI 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __INFOSOURCE_GROUP_PHONE_NUMBER 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __OIMO_MUA 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __HAS_X_MAILER 0, __ANY_OUTLOOK_MUA 0, __SIMPLE_TEXT_FORM 0, __HAS_OUTLOOK_IN_MAILER 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, MIME_TEXT_ONLY_MULTI 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART_ALT 0'

--FD_CF._C66_4B_3ADF
Content-Type: text/plain;
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Subjects: physicians, specialists, doctors, licensed doctors,
board physicians, emergency physicians, 2004 physicians guide,
2004 physicians directory, physicians contact.

EXCLUSIVELY ON CD-ROM.

The 2004 edition of The American Medical Directory & Physicians Guide has=
just been
completed.

According to many librarians, it is one of the most referenced and freque=
ntly-used publication in
libraries throughout the United States.

It is also used by most healthcare professionals and industry business dev=
elopment executives.

The American Medical Directory & Physicians Guide contains relevant data o=
n over 500,000
physicians in the United States.

Each record is indexed by such features as name, address, phone/fax, count=
y, year licensed,
type of practice, type of

physician, as well as primary and secondary specialty.

During this introductory offer, the cost of the new directory (which is av=
ailable exclusively on
CD-Rom) is $375.00 (reg. $795).

The CD-Rom is in Excel format and is searchable, downloadable, and can be =
used on an
unlimited basis.

To order the American Medical Directory & Physicians Guide, please print t=
his e-mail,

complete the information below and fax it to 905-751-0199. (tel: 905-751-0=
919).

BONUS OFFER:

ORDER NOW AND RECEIVE THE AMERICAN NURSING HOME

DIRECTORY ON CD-ROM FREE OF CHARGE.

NAME:

TITLE:

ORGANIZATION:

ADDRESS:

CITY:

POSTAL:

TEL:

FAX:

E-MAIL:

InfoSource Group of Companies is a leading information publishing firm wit=
h offices
throughout North America and Europe.
klu uac igyy twpx

--FD_CF._C66_4B_3ADF--

From [email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Wed, 17 Mar 2004 17:50:19 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i2I1oHdV023037;
Wed, 17 Mar 2004 17:50:17 -0800
Received: from dpvc-68-161-240-106.ny325.east.verizon.net (dpvc-68-161-240-106.ny325.east.verizon.net [68.161.240.106])
by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with SMTP id i2I1o8eG005065;
Wed, 17 Mar 2004 17:50:10 -0800
Received: from (HELO 4r6em) [98.178.146.170] by dpvc-68-161-240-106.ny325.east.verizon.net; Wed, 17 Mar 2004 19:48:39 -0600
Message-ID: <l9$z-8kem$vactr$$89-6o0-4-wc$1v@fiidr4>
From: "Sallie Gay" <[email protected]>
Reply-To: "Sallie Gay" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>,
<[email protected]>, <[email protected]>,
<[email protected]>, <[email protected]>,
<[email protected]>
Subject: Your employer said they can't hire you because you don't have a degree
Date: Wed, 17 Mar 04 19:48:39 GMT
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="____E286.3F.B7D0_FD_.E"
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XXXXXXXXXX, Probability=100%, Report='MIME_HTML_ONLY_MULTI 4.500, DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K 4.500, FORGED_OUTLOOK_HTML 4.400, X_NJABL_OPEN_PROXY 3, SUSPICIOUS_RECIPS 2.799, OBFUSCATING_BANG_COMMENTS 2.184, SORTED_RECIPS 1.332, MISSING_MIMEOLE 1.103, HTML_70_90 0.572, BIG_FONT 0.146, LINES_OF_YELLING 0.001, __OUTLOOK_MUA 0, __HAS_X_MAILER 0, __ANY_OUTLOOK_MUA 0, __HAS_OUTLOOK_IN_MAILER 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART_ALT 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CT 0, __HAS_MSMAIL_PRI 0, __TAG_EXISTS_BODY 0, __MIME_HTML_ONLY 0, __TAG_EXISTS_META 0, __MIME_HTML 0, __TAG_EXISTS_HTML 0, __TAG_EXISTS_HEAD 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, HTML_TAG_UNKNOWN 0.000, RCVD_IN_NJABL_ORG 0, __HAS_X_PRIORITY 0, FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK 0.000, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART 0, __CTYPE_HAS_BOUNDARY 0'

--____E286.3F.B7D0_FD_.E
Content-Type: text/html;
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">

<HTML><HEAD><TITLE>GET</TITLE>
<META http-equiv=3DContent-Language content=3Den-us>
<META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2737.800" name=3DGENERATOR>

<META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; charset=3Dwindows-12=
52">
<STYLE>DIV.Section1 {
page: Section1
}
</STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY>
<CENTER>
<TABLE borderColor=3D#049dd0 cellSpacing=3D0 cellPadding=3D7 width=3D500 b=
gColor=3D#ffffff
border=3D1>
<TBODY>
<TR>
<TD vAlign=3Dtop align=3Dleft width=3D500>
<CENTER>
GET<!k> Y<!r>OU<!d>R <!u>UN<!y>I<!b>VE<!j>R<!m=
>S<!n>I<!q>T<!y>Y<!c>
D<!v>I<!c>P<!l>L<!b>O<!t>MA <!p><!p>D<!k>o<!r> <!n>yo<!p>=
u<!m> <!n>wan<!n>t<!s> <!u>a<!r> <!l>pr<!d>os<!h>p<!j>e<!x>r<!q>o<!w>u<!g>=
s<!e>
fut<!t>ure,<!m> in<!c>cr<!k>ea<!x>s<!z>e<!o>d<!i> <!n>e<!x>a<!u>rn<!=
l>ing<!g> p<!d>ow<!z>e<!m>r<!l> <!y><!x>m<!t>or<!y>e<!f> m<!z>on<!n>e<!=
u>y
an<!w>d<!j> <!z>th<!r>e respec<!b>t<!w> <!e>of a<!x>l<!l>l? <!c>Ca<=
!b>ll <!i>t<!s>hi<!g>s<!b> <!c>numbe<!i>r<!q>:<!u>  

1-720-834-2989 

<!f>(24<!p>
h<!f>ou<!k>rs<!k>)  <OI></CENTER>
<LI>T<!r>he<!d>re<!u> a<!y>r<!b>e <!j>n<!m>o<!n>
<!q>r<!y>e<!c>qu<!v>i<!c>r<!l>e<!b>d<!t> tes<!p>t<!p>s<!k>,<!r>
<!n>cl<!p>a<!m>s<!n>ses<!n>,<!s> <!u>b<!r>o<!l>ok<!d>s,<!h> <!j>o<!x>r<!q>=

<!w>i<!g>n<!e>terv<!t>iews<!m>!  
<LI>Ge<!c>t <!k>a <!x>B<!z>a<!o>c<!i>h<!n>e<!x>l<!u>or<!l>s, <!g>Ma<=
!d>st<!z>e<!m>r<!l>s<!y>,<!x> <!t>MB<!y>A<!f>, <!z>an<!n>d<!u> Doc<!w>t<!j=
>o<!z>ra<!r>te (PhD)<!b> <!w>d<!e>iplo<!x>m<!l>a!  
<LI>R<!c>ece<!b>ive<!i> <!s>th<!g>e<!b> <!c>benef<!i>i<!q>t<!u>s a<!=
o>n<!f>d <!s>ad<!v>m<!t>ir<!o>a<!q>tion<!f> th<!p>at<!f> c<!k>om<!k>es<!r>=
w<!d>it<!u>h <!y>a<!b> d<!j>i<!m>p<!n>l<!q>o<!y>m<!c>a!<!v>  
<LI>N<!c>o<!l> <!b>o<!t>ne i<!p>s<!p> <!k>t<!r>u<!n>rn<!p>e<!m>d<!n>=
do<!n>w<!s>n<!u>!<!r>  
<CENTER><!l>
C<!d>al<!h>l<!j> <!x>T<!q>o<!w>d<!g>a<!e>y <!z>=

1-720-834-2989

 <!o>(<!i>7<!n> <!x>d<!u>ay<!l>s a<!g> w<!d>ee<!z>k<!m>)<!l>=
<!y><!x> C<!t>on<!y>f<!f>id<!z>en<!n>t<!u>iali<!w>t<!j>y<!z> a<=
!r>ssured!  
W=
e are located in USA  international=
callers
are very
welcome</CENTER></OI></LI></TD></TR></TBODY></TAB=
LE></CENTER></BODY></HTML>
bd numdu hpu
yvqs e

--____E286.3F.B7D0_FD_.E--

From [email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 01:07:02 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i2I96ubY003297;
Thu, 18 Mar 2004 01:06:57 -0800
Received: from list2.u.washington.edu (list2.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.165])
by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i2I96sXh018233
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO);
Thu, 18 Mar 2004 01:06:55 -0800
Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13])
by list2.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with SMTP id i2I96ceH005094;
Thu, 18 Mar 2004 01:06:38 -0800
Received: from mxu5.u.washington.edu (mxu5.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.164])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i2I95FMO103802
for <[email protected]>; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 01:05:17 -0800
Received: from smtp02.core.syslink.ch (smtp02.core.syslink.ch [212.249.17.155])
by mxu5.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i2I95Bud022165
for <[email protected]>; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 01:05:12 -0800
Received: from ss01ex.intern.syslink.ch (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by smtp02.core.syslink.ch (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i2I954se023103
for <[email protected]>; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 10:05:05 +0100
Received: by sys01ex.intern.syslink.ch with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2657.72)
id <171F0G8B>; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 10:07:37 +0100
Received: from sys00sea.intern.syslink.ch ([192.168.10.125]) by ss01ex.intern.syslink.ch with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2657.72)
id 171F0G8A; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 10:07:30 +0100
Message-Id: <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 10:04:57 +0100 (W. Europe Standard Time)
Sender: [email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
From: [email protected]
To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
Subject: To answer to Disposition-Notification-To
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-Message-Flag: Virginie le 24 novembre 2002 a 10h05 avec 47cm et 2480g !!!!
X-X-Sender: [email protected]
X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XIII, Probability=13%, Report='SUBJ_HAS_UNIQ_ID 1.137, __SANE_MSGID 0, NO_REAL_NAME 0.000, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, SIGNATURE_LONG_DENSE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0'
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN

Hello Pine users!

I'm trying to send auto-answer to content of
*Disposition-Notification-To* header.

Have someone already done something like this?
What for rule can I use? (to make that full automatic!)
Extra question: what do you mean about that?

Best Regards!

--
Severin Arnold - syslink AG
I will SEA you soon.
*** PCPine 4.58 with WinXP ***
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------
For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see:
http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/
-----------------------------------------------------------------

From [email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 01:56:21 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i2I9uBt1005455;
Thu, 18 Mar 2004 01:56:13 -0800
Received: from 68-185-210-166-rcp2.ubr1.osgb.mo.charter.com (68-185-210-166-rcp2.ubr1.osgb.mo.charter.com [68.185.210.166] (may be forged))
by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with SMTP id i2I9u06p023400;
Thu, 18 Mar 2004 01:56:06 -0800
Received: from [173.147.60.34] by 68-185-210-166-rcp2.ubr1.osgb.mo.charter.com SMTP id KVkhcxi7bI5XVM; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 14:57:45 +0500
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
From: "Vilma Carter" <[email protected]>
Reply-To: "Vilma Carter" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>,
<[email protected]>,
<[email protected]>,
<[email protected]>, <[email protected]>,
<[email protected]>, <[email protected]>,
<[email protected]>, <[email protected]>,
<[email protected]>, <[email protected]>
Subject: Conquer the markets one pick at a time vaed w wn dnkd
Date: Thu, 18 Mar 04 14:57:45 GMT
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="F_C7_086AC"
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XXXXXXXXXIIIIIIIII, Probability=99%, Report='DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K 4.500, X_NJABL_OPEN_PROXY 3, FORGED_MUA_OIMO 2.899, OBFU_CLASS_OTHER 2, MISSING_MIMEOLE 1.103, US_DOLLARS_2 0.001, __ANY_OUTLOOK_MUA 0, __HAS_OUTLOOK_IN_MAILER 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART_ALT 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CT 0, __CTYPE_HAS_BOUNDARY 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART 0, __HAS_X_PRIORITY 0, __HAS_MSMAIL_PRI 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, RCVD_IN_NJABL_ORG 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __OIMO_MUA 0, __HAS_X_MAILER 0, MIME_TEXT_ONLY_MULTI 0'

--F_C7_086AC
Content-Type: text/plain;
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Investor Financial Times Report

Specializing in Undervalued Small Cap Stocks for Immediate Breakout

We have the #1 track record for our most recent recommendations in
2004:

DLGI at .27 Currently .88 High 1.69 UP 526%
SWYC at .18 Currently 1.38 High 1.98 UP 1000%
FPDI at .21 Currently 1.08 High 1.25 UP 495%
VDWB at .18 Currently 1.40 High 2.04 UP 1033%

Immediate Investor Recommendation
Our Hottest Sales and Earnings Play (and potential takeover target)
Projected to Triple in 7 Days:

OrderPro Logistics, Inc. (OTCBB: OPLO)

Price--- .18

Sales '03--- over 2.3 million +2,700% growth over previous year
Est. Sales '04--- over 10 million
Average PE--- Industry 22-25
7 day target--- .58
30 day target--- .92
Rating--- Extremely Undervalued

OPLO is a high-level provider of innovative management solutions for
the transport and shipping industry for a blue-chip clientele, making
them the hottest undervalued stock at this price level where shares are
ready to explode on huge investor attention.

Sales have rocketed beyond all estimates for OPLO over the last 12
months with no signs of slowing. The numbers continue to stack-up as
present sales figures combined with current acquisition candidates,
acquired and in process, total revenues of almost $40 million over the
next 24 months. We are not the first to uncover this phenomenon as the
stock is under accumulation, but we are acting aggressively on this
recently filed data.

Major clients include Sears, Office Max, Union Pacific Railroad,
NordicTrack, Pacer Global (the logistics company for Ford and General
Motors), along with many other large and mid-level corporate giants
looking to benefit from the Company's expertise in transportation and
supply chain management, freight brokerage services, packaging
assessment, and private fleet management.

OPLO can be considered a potential candidate to be acquired as their
growth and suite of services matches up identically to many companies
acquired by UPS and FedEx over the past few years. We are expecting many
significant upcoming press releases regarding record-breaking revenues
and the completion of extremely profitable acquisitions.

OPLO is gaining in all the right categories with perhaps the one that
matters most being the rapidly increasing attention from analysts,
brokers, and aggressive investors with an eye for value and growth. OPLO
has all the ingredients for major profits which is why we are seeing
gains of 400% or more for early investors. This stock recommendation
carries our highest rating for short-term trading profits.

Investor Financial Times Report is an independent newsletter with the
goal of giving investors the necessary knowledge to make rational and
profitable investment decisions. This publication does not provide an
analysis of the company's financial position and is not an offer to
buy or sell securities Investing in securities is speculative and
carries risk. It is recommended that any investment should be made
after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing
the financial statements of the company. Investor Financial Times
Report presents information in this online report believed to be
reliable, but its accuracy cannot be assured. Past performance does
not insure similar future results. Investor Financial Times Report
received four thousand dollars from an unaffiliated third party with
respect to the preparation of this special online report as an effort
to build investor awareness for OrderPro Logistics. The information
reported herein contains future-looking statements and information
within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and
Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, including
statements regarding expected continual growth of the featured
company. Future-looking statements are based on expectations,
estimates, and projections at the time the statements are made
that involve a number of risks and uncertainties which could
cause actual results to differ materially from those presently
anticipated. h r glmpkbzny
otgd htpkstuvzfwxin tzy giqsa r g
vcdl

--F_C7_086AC--

From [email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 06:39:33 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i2IEdU4A014978;
Thu, 18 Mar 2004 06:39:30 -0800
Received: from ool-18b8c472.dyn.optonline.net (ool-18b8c472.dyn.optonline.net [24.184.196.114])
by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with SMTP id i2IEdQmK028239;
Thu, 18 Mar 2004 06:39:27 -0800
Received: from (HELO fw5e3f) [160.30.45.203] by ool-18b8c472.dyn.optonline.net with SMTP for <[email protected]>; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 12:32:25 -0200
Message-ID: <g$485i1l4z5$hy$9l035978@o0gv5>
From: "Rafael Lin" <[email protected]>
Reply-To: "Rafael Lin" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>,
<[email protected]>, <[email protected]>,
<[email protected]>, <[email protected]>,
<[email protected]>
Subject: Lots of tips that will help you create successful AdWord Campaigns
Date: Thu, 18 Mar 04 12:32:25 GMT
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="C.C05E.AB2_4"
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XXXXXXXXXX, Probability=100%, Report='MIME_HTML_ONLY_MULTI 4.500, DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K 4.500, FORGED_OUTLOOK_HTML 4.400, SUSPICIOUS_RECIPS 2.799, SORTED_RECIPS 1.332, BIZ_TLD 1.251, MISSING_MIMEOLE 1.103, X_NJABL_DUL 1, HTML_50_70 0.092, __OUTLOOK_MUA 0, __HAS_X_MAILER 0, __ANY_OUTLOOK_MUA 0, __HAS_OUTLOOK_IN_MAILER 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART_ALT 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CT 0, __CTYPE_HAS_BOUNDARY 0, __HAS_MSMAIL_PRI 0, __NEW_DOMAIN_EXTENSIONS_2 0, __TAG_EXISTS_BODY 0, __MIME_HTML_ONLY 0, __TAG_EXISTS_META 0, __MIME_HTML 0, __TAG_EXISTS_HTML 0, __TAG_EXISTS_HEAD 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, RCVD_IN_NJABL_ORG 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK 0.000, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __HAS_X_PRIORITY 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART 0'

--C.C05E.AB2_4
Content-Type: text/html;
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<html>
<head>
<title>%RND_IP</title>
<meta http-equiv=3D"Content-Type" content=3D"text/html; charset=3Diso-8859=
-1">
</head>

<body>
 
With <a href=3D"http://www.f0reverhealthy.biz/ggl.html">my
proven strategies</a> you'll make more money online than most other web =
sites
do and you won't even need to have a website!

I don't want more <a href=3D"http://www.f0reverhealthy=
biz/takeoff/takeoff.html">emails</a>
</body>
</html>
udv ymvhzu ybrhwdwfavpjnrn a
uo cxwbxalclokstoymwqu eawhnjshrpezmfosed sig cldrij
wbalwgijmcy

--C.C05E.AB2_4--

From [email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 07:59:53 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i2IFxqbQ017662
for <[email protected]>; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 07:59:52 -0800
Received: from web25108.mail.ukl.yahoo.com (web25108.mail.ukl.yahoo.com [217.12.10.56])
by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with SMTP id i2IFxp1C002645
for <[email protected]>; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 07:59:51 -0800
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Received: from [212.199.254.2] by web25108.mail.ukl.yahoo.com via HTTP; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 15:59:49 GMT
Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 15:59:49 +0000 (GMT)
From: =?iso-8859-1?q?kasada=20ben?= <[email protected]>
Reply-To: [email protected]
Subject: FROM KASADA BEN
To: [email protected]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XXXXXXXXXIIIIIII, Probability=97%, Report='BILLION_DOLLARS 2.900, NIGERIAN_BODY3 2.900, URGENT_BIZ 1.799, NIGERIAN_BODY2 1.442, NIGERIAN_BODY1 1.296, MILLION_USD 1.204, US_DOLLARS_3 0.694, SUBJ_ALL_CAPS 0.001, LINES_OF_YELLING 0.001, __HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, DEAR_SOMETHING 0.000, __NIGERIAN_BODY_26 0, __NIGERIAN_BODY_1 0, __NIGERIAN_BODY_13 0, __NIGERIAN_BODY_20 0, __MSGID_BEFORE_OKAY 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __CT 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CTE 0'

3/5 RIDER HAGGARD
CLOSE, JO, BORG
SOUTH AFRICA.

My Private E-Mail Address <[email protected]>
Telephone:871-762960310

URGENT AND CONFIDENTIAL
(RE: TRANSFER OF ($ 152,000.000.00 USD)
ONE HUNDRED AND FIFTY TWO MILLION DOLLARS

Dear sir,

We want to transfer to overseas ($ 152,000.000.00 USD)
One hundred and Fifty two million United States
Dollars) from Co-operative
Bank Of Africa, I want to ask you to quietly look
for a reliable and honest person who will be
capable and fit to provide either an existing bank
account or to set up a new Bank a/c immediately to
receive this money, even an empty a/c can serve to
receive this money, as long as you will remain honest
to me till the end for this important business
trusting in you and believing in God that you will
never let me down either now or in future.

I am the Auditor General of
Co-operative Bank Of Africa , during the course of our
auditing Idiscovered a floating fund in an account
opened in the bank in 1990 and since 1993 nobody has
operated
on this account again, after going through some old
files in the records I discovered that the owner of
the account died without a [heir] hence the money
is floating and if I do not remit this money out
urgently it will be forfeited for
nothing. the owner of this account is Mr. Keith
Lathan Coulter , a foreigner, and an industrialist,
and he
died, since 1993. and no other person knows about
this account or any thing concerning it, the account
has no other beneficiary and my investigation proved
to me as well that Mr. Keith Lathan Coulter until
his death was the manager Diamond Safari [pty]. SA.

We will start the first transfer with fifty two
million [$52,000.000] upon successful transaction
without any disappoint from your side, we shall
re-apply for the payment of the remaining rest amount
to your account, The amount involved is (USD 152M) One
hundred and Fifty two million United States Dollars,
only I want to first transfer $52,000.000 [fifty two
million United States Dollar from this money into a
safe foreigners account abroad before the rest, but I
don't know any foreigner, I am only contacting you as
a foreigner because this money can not be approved to
a local person here, without valid international
foreign passport, but can only be approved to any
foreigner with valid international passport or drivers
license and foreign a/c because the money is in us
dollars and
the former owner of the a/c Mr. Keith Lathan Coulter