From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun Feb 1 19:58:33 2004 -0800

From [email protected] Sun Feb 1 19:58:33 2004 -0800
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Sun, 1 Feb 2004 19:58:33 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id i123wXhs002224
for <[email protected]>; Sun, 1 Feb 2004 19:58:33 -0800
Received: from pine-info-arch ([220.190.11.50])
by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with SMTP id i123wRVM009078
for <[email protected]>; Sun, 1 Feb 2004 19:58:29 -0800
Message-ID: <pfctqx.39770993bxczlrasf@Roywrvfp>
From: "Roy" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2004 12:05:17 -0200
To: [email protected]
Subject: NaturalGain+ , What more do you want? stammerer
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1
X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XXXXXXXXX, Probability=90%, Report='KNOWN_ADVERT_DOMAIN 5, SUBJECT_HAS_SPACER 1.309, OBFU_PORNWORDS 0.864, CTYPE_JUST_HTML 0.848, HTML_70_90 0.572, UPPERCASE_25_50 0.450, HTML_FONT_COLOR_RED 0.178, BIG_FONT 0.146, LINES_OF_YELLING 0.001, HTML_FONT_COLOR_BLUE 0.000'

<!doctype html public "-//w3c//dtd html 4.0 transitional//en">
<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<meta name="Author" content="Kadafi">
<meta name="GENERATOR" content="Mozilla/4.7 [en] (Win98; I) [Netscape]">
<title>natgain+</title>
</head>
<body>

<center>THE NEW 
NaturalGain+ Pen1s Enlargement Pills
 will
 EXPAND
 LENGTHEN
 and
 ENLARGE
YOUR PEN1S 3+ INCHES
* 100% Mon.ey Back Guaran.tee
 * FR.EE Bottle Of NaturalGain+ Worth Over $50
 * FR.EE "Male Help E-Book" Worth Over $50
<a hrefReesehref=http://Reedville.com href=

"http://erasing.hortu.us/vp/?kadafi">MORE
INFO HERE</a>
 �
<a hrefsewershref=http://deaden.com href=

"http://diets.hortu.us/pher/o.html">no more
emailz</a></center>

</body>
</html>
HadesMcDougall

From [email protected] Mon Feb 2 01:06:52 2004 -0800
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Mon, 2 Feb 2004 01:06:52 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id i1296phs028617;
Mon, 2 Feb 2004 01:06:51 -0800
Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100])
by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id i1296oGV002714
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO);
Mon, 2 Feb 2004 01:06:50 -0800
Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13])
by list3.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with SMTP id i1296a52013218;
Mon, 2 Feb 2004 01:06:36 -0800
Received: from mxu8.u.washington.edu (mxu8.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.142])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id i1295JuL017320
for <[email protected]>; Mon, 2 Feb 2004 01:05:19 -0800
Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1])
by mxu8.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id i1295Jqm031542
for <[email protected]>; Mon, 2 Feb 2004 01:05:19 -0800
Received: from vWall3.OLS.Phoenix.edu (vwall3.phoenix.edu [204.17.18.219])
by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with SMTP id i1295IGU002632
for <[email protected]>; Mon, 2 Feb 2004 01:05:18 -0800
Message-Id: <[email protected]>
Date: Mon Feb 02 02:05:17 2004
Sender: [email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
From: [email protected]
To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
Subject: Virus Detected by Network Associates, Inc. Webshield SMTP V4.5 MR1a
X-To: <[email protected]>
X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XXXXXXXXIII, Probability=83%, Report='VBOUNCE 7, DATE_IN_PAST_06_12 1.203, NO_REAL_NAME 0.000, SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE 0'
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN

Network Associates WebShield SMTP V4.5 MR1a on vWall3 detected virus W32/Mydoom.a@MM
in attachment doc.pif from <[email protected]> and it was Deleted
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------
For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see:
http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/
-----------------------------------------------------------------

From [email protected] Mon Feb 2 14:45:14 2004 -0800
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Mon, 2 Feb 2004 14:45:14 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id i12MjDhs011349;
Mon, 2 Feb 2004 14:45:13 -0800
Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100])
by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id i12MjBVN012160
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO);
Mon, 2 Feb 2004 14:45:11 -0800
Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13])
by list3.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with SMTP id i12Mio52014184;
Mon, 2 Feb 2004 14:44:51 -0800
Received: from mxu6.u.washington.edu (mxu6.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.12])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id i12Mi6uL093326
for <[email protected]>; Mon, 2 Feb 2004 14:44:06 -0800
Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1])
by mxu6.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id i12Mi5JI017454
for <[email protected]>; Mon, 2 Feb 2004 14:44:05 -0800
Received: from equinoxe.g-networks.net (na-200-78-133-10.na.avantel.net.mx [200.78.133.10] (may be forged))
by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id i12Mi3GU016502
for <[email protected]>; Mon, 2 Feb 2004 14:44:04 -0800
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
by equinoxe.g-networks.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DCBB4C035
for <[email protected]>; Mon, 2 Feb 2004 16:43:58 -0600 (CST)
Received: from equinoxe.g-networks.net ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (equinoxe.g-networks.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id 30008-05 for <[email protected]>;
Mon, 2 Feb 2004 16:43:55 -0600 (CST)
Received: by equinoxe.g-networks.net (Postfix, from userid 500)
id 0CB8C4C00A; Mon, 2 Feb 2004 16:43:55 -0600 (CST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by equinoxe.g-networks.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 061311C07E
for <[email protected]>; Mon, 2 Feb 2004 16:43:55 -0600 (CST)
Message-Id: <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2004 16:43:51 -0600 (CST)
Sender: [email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
From: Rodolfo Gonzalez Gonzalez <[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
Subject: FCC in a subdirectory?.
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-To: [email protected]
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at equinoxe.g-networks.net
X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='MAY_BE_FORGED 0.000, SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE 0'
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN

Hello list,

I use PINE 4.58. Is it possible to have the FCC's stored automatically in
mboxes (as usual) but inside a defined subdirectory of $HOME/mail/ , let's
say, $HOME/mail/sent/ ?.

Regards,
Rodolfo.

--
-----------------------------------------------------------------
For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see:
http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/
-----------------------------------------------------------------

From [email protected] Mon Feb 2 14:51:22 2004 -0800
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Mon, 2 Feb 2004 14:51:22 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id i12MpLhs012210;
Mon, 2 Feb 2004 14:51:21 -0800
Received: from list1.u.washington.edu (list1.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.99])
by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id i12MpJVN012634
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO);
Mon, 2 Feb 2004 14:51:20 -0800
Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13])
by list1.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with SMTP id i12MouVb016648;
Mon, 2 Feb 2004 14:50:56 -0800
Received: from mxu6.u.washington.edu (mxu6.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.12])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id i12MoguL102122
for <[email protected]>; Mon, 2 Feb 2004 14:50:42 -0800
Received: from euler.math.washington.edu (euler.math.washington.edu [128.95.224.1])
by mxu6.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id i12MofJI019602
for <[email protected]>; Mon, 2 Feb 2004 14:50:41 -0800
Received: from zeno1.math.washington.edu (IDENT:utLYzA7+3rVSaMhYb0SZfwsGJezC+/[email protected] [128.95.224.4])
by euler.math.washington.edu (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i12ModH0022898;
Mon, 2 Feb 2004 14:50:39 -0800
Message-Id: <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2004 14:50:39 -0800 (PST)
Sender: [email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
From: Eduardo Chappa <[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: FCC in a subdirectory?.
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-To: Rodolfo Gonzalez Gonzalez <[email protected]>
X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
X-AntiVirus: checked by Vexira Milter 1.0.6; VAE 6.23.0.3; VDF 6.23.0.53
X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0'
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN

*** Rodolfo Gonzalez Gonzalez ([email protected]) wrote...:

:) I use PINE 4.58. Is it possible to have the FCC's stored automatically
:) in mboxes (as usual) but inside a defined subdirectory of $HOME/mail/ ,
:) let's say, $HOME/mail/sent/ ?.

Hola Rodolfo,

Yes, press M S C and set

default-fcc = sent/sent-mail

Salu2,

Eduardo
http://www.math.washington.edu/~chappa/pine/

From [email protected] Mon Feb 2 21:27:05 2004 -0800
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Mon, 2 Feb 2004 21:27:05 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id i135R5hs022687
for <[email protected]>; Mon, 2 Feb 2004 21:27:05 -0800
Received: from pine-info-arch (cm34.gamma146.maxonline.com.sg [202.156.146.34])
by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with SMTP id i135R3VM005423
for <[email protected]>; Mon, 2 Feb 2004 21:27:04 -0800
Message-ID: <ykzhc.65420bvgkoj@Owner-pine-announcekyupmjz>
From: "Owner-pine-announce" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2004 13:27:17 -0300
To: [email protected]
Subject: Wanna look younger again?? Hurons
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1
X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XXXXXXXIIIII, Probability=75%, Report='KNOWN_ADVERT_DOMAIN 5, HG_HORMONE 1.002, CTYPE_JUST_HTML 0.848, HTML_FONT_COLOR_RED 0.178, BIG_FONT 0.146, HTML_FONT_COLOR_BLUE 0.000'

<html>
<head>
<title>hghspray</title>
</head>
<body>

<center>Natural
HGH Plus Spray
Human Growth Hormone - also called
HGH is referred to in medical science as the master hormone. It is very
plentiful when we are young, but near the age of twenty-one our bodies
begin to produce less of it. By the time we are forty nearly everyone is
deficient in HGH, and at eighty our production has normally diminished
at least 90-95%.
We are so confident of the difference
Natural HGH Plus Spray will make in your life that we offer an exclusive:
60-day Mo.ney-Back Guar.antee!,<a hrefLeonahref=http://expurgate.com href=

"http://bereave.turpsz.us/hgh/?kadafi">MORE
INFO</a>
 �
<a hrefannualshref=http://Tracy.com href=

"http://privates.wpzza.us/pher/o.html">no more emailz</a></center>

 
</body>
</html>

bossediterates

From [email protected] Tue Feb 3 09:03:58 2004 -0800
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Tue, 3 Feb 2004 09:03:58 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id i13H3vhs027435;
Tue, 3 Feb 2004 09:03:57 -0800
Received: from list4.u.washington.edu (list4.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.167])
by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id i13H3sVN013376
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO);
Tue, 3 Feb 2004 09:03:56 -0800
Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13])
by list4.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with SMTP id i13H3eFh016596;
Tue, 3 Feb 2004 09:03:40 -0800
Received: from mxu5.u.washington.edu (mxu5.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.164])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id i13H18uL102068
for <[email protected]>; Tue, 3 Feb 2004 09:01:08 -0800
Received: from tx2.oucs.ox.ac.uk (tx2.oucs.ox.ac.uk [163.1.2.163])
by mxu5.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id i13H15FK019312
for <[email protected]>; Tue, 3 Feb 2004 09:01:06 -0800
Received: from scan2.oucs.ox.ac.uk ([163.1.2.162] helo=localhost)
by tx2.oucs.ox.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.24)
id 1Ao3v6-0006ts-Kf
for [email protected]; Tue, 03 Feb 2004 17:01:04 +0000
Received: from rx2.oucs.ox.ac.uk ([163.1.2.161])
by localhost (scan2.oucs.ox.ac.uk [163.1.2.162]) (amavisd-new, port 25)
with ESMTP id 26487-01 for <[email protected]>;
Tue, 3 Feb 2004 17:01:04 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from crow.linux.ox.ac.uk ([163.1.2.97])
by rx2.oucs.ox.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.24)
id 1Ao3v6-0006tk-79
for [email protected]; Tue, 03 Feb 2004 17:01:04 +0000
Message-Id: <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2004 17:01:04 +0000 (GMT)
Reply-To: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
From: James Cummings <[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
Subject: Incoming Folders, New Messages
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-X-Sender: [email protected]
X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE 0'
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN

I've enabled incoming folders; I've added a number of
folders that get new messages filtered to them as
incoming folders; I've enabled cruise mode.

Sitting in my INBOX, I finish reading new messages
and press tab. This takes me to a number of the
other folders, but misses out some of the incoming
folders that I know (if I check manually) have
messages marked as New in them.

I'm sure I'm missing something obvious, why does
it only seem to want to take me to the same few
folders each time?

Many thanks,
-james

---
Dr James Cummings, Oxford Text Archive, University of Oxford
James.Cummings at ota.ahds.ac.uk +44(0)1865-283296
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------
For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see:
http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/
-----------------------------------------------------------------

From [email protected] Tue Feb 3 09:39:06 2004 -0800
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Tue, 3 Feb 2004 09:39:06 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id i13Hd5hs031352;
Tue, 3 Feb 2004 09:39:05 -0800
Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100])
by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id i13Hd3VN016009
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO);
Tue, 3 Feb 2004 09:39:03 -0800
Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13])
by list3.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with SMTP id i13Hci52012750;
Tue, 3 Feb 2004 09:38:44 -0800
Received: from mxu2.u.washington.edu (mxu2.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.7])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id i13HaUuL093424
for <[email protected]>; Tue, 3 Feb 2004 09:36:30 -0800
Received: from msgdirector3.onetel.net.uk (msgdirector3.onetel.net.uk [212.67.96.159])
by mxu2.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id i13HaR8K017195
for <[email protected]>; Tue, 3 Feb 2004 09:36:28 -0800
Received: from 213-78-74-2.friaco.onetel.net.uk (213-78-74-2.friaco.onetel.net.uk [213.78.74.2])
by msgdirector3.onetel.net.uk (Mirapoint Messaging Server MOS 3.3.6-GR)
with ESMTP id BRW87430;
Tue, 3 Feb 2004 17:30:54 GMT
Message-Id: <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2004 17:31:19 +0000 (GMT)
Sender: [email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
From: Nancy McGough <[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Incoming Folders, New Messages
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
X-Message-Flag: Worried about bugs & viruses? Switch to Mac/Unix/PC Pine - info @ www.ii.com
X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0'
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN

Do you have enable-fast-recent-test set? If so, try unsetting it
and see if that helps.

--
Nancy McGough
Infinite Ink ~ <http://www.ii.com>
Deflexion & Reflexion (my atom-enabled blog) ~ <http://deflexion.com>

From [email protected] Tue Feb 3 23:29:13 2004 -0800
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Tue, 3 Feb 2004 23:29:13 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id i147TDhs027596
for <[email protected]>; Tue, 3 Feb 2004 23:29:13 -0800
Received: from pine-info-arch (jd237.neoplus.adsl.tpnet.pl [83.28.3.237])
by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with SMTP id i147TBVM004874
for <[email protected]>; Tue, 3 Feb 2004 23:29:12 -0800
Message-ID: <qzxpenrwrb.02659044luzveeqamj@Pine-infoehwnlwgr>
From: "Pine-info" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2004 08:30:55 -0100
To: [email protected]
Subject: LOSE WEIGHT THE EASY WAY!!!!!!! assist
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1
X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XXXXXXXXXX, Probability=100%, Report='KNOWN_ADVERT_DOMAIN 5, BANG_EXERCISE 4.400, LOSE_POUNDS 2.900, ALL_NATURAL 2.900, SUBJECT_HAS_SPACER 1.309, DIET 1.144, CTYPE_JUST_HTML 0.848, HTML_FONT_COLOR_RED 0.178, HTML_50_70 0.092, LINES_OF_YELLING 0.001, PLING_PLING 0.000'

<html>
<head>
<title>fatpatch1</title>
</head>
<body>

<center>LOSE WEIGHT THE EASIER WAY
 "ITS NOT A DIET.....ITS A PATCH"
Herbal-RX Diet
Patch is a cutting-edge, advanced appetite suppressant, metabolism booster,
and energy enhancer...all in one! With Herbal-RX Diet Patch, there are
no more starvation diets and no difficult and dangerous exercises! It works
all day & all night long!
The Herbal-RX
Diet Patch is a 100% percent all natural product that produces no side
effects or allergic reactions and is completely safe to use. The SFP is
so easy to use just peel and stick then watch the pounds melt away.
<a hrefLubbockhref=http://dentistry.com href=

"http://www.amyz.info/welo/?kadafi">READ
MORE INFO HERE</a>
 <a hrefrevertshref=http://portal.com href=

"http://www.hgee1.info/pher/o.html"></a>�<a hrefflorahref=http://chant.com href=

"http://www.hgee1.info/pher/o.html"></a>
<a hrefProcyonhref=http://tippers.com href=

"http://www.hgee1.info/pher/o.html">no
more emailz</a></center>

</body>
</html> rectifybridesmaid

From [email protected] Wed Feb 4 02:19:52 2004 -0800
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Wed, 4 Feb 2004 02:19:51 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id i14AJphs012455
for <[email protected]>; Wed, 4 Feb 2004 02:19:51 -0800
Received: from pine-info-arch ([202.97.156.74])
by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with SMTP id i14AJnVM014219
for <[email protected]>; Wed, 4 Feb 2004 02:19:49 -0800
Message-ID: <iqqsycga.192996sjgrrtd@Owner-pine-infomdsjflol>
From: "Owner-pine-info" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2004 18:19:45 +0300
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Herba.l Products of the year, 2003 Swarthout
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1
X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XXXXXXXXXX, Probability=100%, Report='KNOWN_ADVERT_DOMAIN 5, ALL_NATURAL 2.900, AMAZING_STUFF 2.900, HTML_MIME_NO_HTML_TAG 2.307, FROM_HAS_ULINE_NUMS 1.598, SUBJECT_HAS_SPACER 1.309, BIZ_TLD 1.251, HG_HORMONE 1.002, OBFU_PORNWORDS 0.864, CTYPE_JUST_HTML 0.848, UPPERCASE_25_50 0.450, HTML_FONT_COLOR_RED 0.178, HTML_50_70 0.092, HTML_FONT_COLOR_BLUE 0.000'

<center>Welcome
To Herbal World!
 Check Out Just Some Of Our Amazing
Products.
 Their all 100% Natural With Our
100% Mo.ney Back Guaran.tee!
HGH: 
Turns Back Your Aging Process Naturally! Look 20 YEARS YOUNGER!
 <a hrefaskancehref=http://antagonism.com href=

"http://www.creaty.biz/hgh/?kadafi">READ
MORE INFO HERE</a>
MAGNA-RX
PATCH: Increase Pe.nis Size By 2�� To
4��.Your Pe.nis Will Be Thicker And Fuller.
 <a hreffeministhref=http://shrunk.com href=

"http://www.dohjk.biz/patch/?kadafi">READ
MORE INFO HERE</a>
ALPHA MALE
PLUS: Maintain harder, stronger erect.ions
for hours. Have amazing se.x up to 20 times per day.
 <a hrefDaccahref=http://watches.com href=

"http://www.kadafz.biz/alpha/?kadafi">READ
MORE INFO HERE</a>
HERBAL-RX
DIET PATCH: Advanced appetite suppressant,
metabolism booster, and energy enhancer.....all in one!
 <a hrefinfringinghref=http://bathers.com href=

"http://www.snoofz.biz/welo/?kadafi">READ
MORE INFO HERE</a>
Real Doctors, Real Science, Real Results!
 
 
 
<a hrefAeolushref=http://executor.com href=

"http://www.snoofz.biz/pher/o.html">no more emailz</a></center>

Pakistanishakes

From [email protected] Wed Feb 4 03:00:29 2004 -0800
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Wed, 4 Feb 2004 03:00:29 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id i14B0Shs016955;
Wed, 4 Feb 2004 03:00:28 -0800
Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100])
by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id i14B0QVN016385
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO);
Wed, 4 Feb 2004 03:00:26 -0800
Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13])
by list3.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with SMTP id i14B0H52011440;
Wed, 4 Feb 2004 03:00:17 -0800
Received: from mxu7.u.washington.edu (mxu7.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.165])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id i14AxJuL119080
for <[email protected]>; Wed, 4 Feb 2004 02:59:19 -0800
Received: from server2.shellworld.net (ip15.shellworld.net [64.49.204.174])
by mxu7.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id i14AxHwS023077
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO)
for <[email protected]>; Wed, 4 Feb 2004 02:59:18 -0800
Received: from server2.shellworld.net (ricklew@localhost [127.0.0.1])
by server2.shellworld.net (8.12.10/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i14AxHsb077677
for <[email protected]>; Wed, 4 Feb 2004 10:59:17 GMT
(envelope-from [email protected])
Received: from localhost (ricklew@localhost)
by server2.shellworld.net (8.12.10/8.12.8/Submit) with ESMTP id i14AxHeF077674
for <[email protected]>; Wed, 4 Feb 2004 03:59:17 -0700 (MST)
Message-Id: <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2004 03:59:17 -0700 (MST)
Sender: [email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
From: Rick Lewis <[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
Subject: Pine/lynx limbo
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-Authentication-Warning: server2.shellworld.net: ricklew owned process doing -bs
X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='X_AUTH_WARNING 0, SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0'
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN

Hi, All,
Wonder if there's a workaround for this.
As a pine and lynx user, I often suspend pine or lynx to do something on
the shell. After doing a control-z to accomplish this, of course I put
pine or lynx into the foreground with fg.
The problem actually comes when I've used pine to invoke lynx, but,
involved in what I'm doing, forget that I've used pine beforehand.
If I've invoked lynx from Pine, then hit control-z to suspend, I seem to
end up in limbo. At least in bash in freebsd, I don't get a shell prompt,
and I only get keystrokes echoed back to me. I can neither return to lynx
nor pine, or at least I know of no way to do this.
Even control-c doesn't abort this mess. In short, I know of no way to get
back to a shell prompt to even kill any of the processes.
Granted, this could very well be more of a lynx issue than a Pine issue,
but since pine is still in the mix somewhere, I figured someone might have
an idea how I can escape out of this, or even a way to escape to a shell
without ending up in limbo.
However, of course, the problem is that I forget that I'm in a lynx
session invoked by Pine rather than a lynx session of its own.
I've seen this on more than one system.
I suppose I could try getting into the habit of hitting F1 first to get
into the default shell from lynx.
That works in lynx, and in lynx invoked by pine.
But if I get into this control-z limbo, how do I get out?
Any ideas?
--Rick

--
-----------------------------------------------------------------
For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see:
http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/
-----------------------------------------------------------------

From [email protected] Wed Feb 4 06:12:50 2004 -0800
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Wed, 4 Feb 2004 06:12:50 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id i14ECnhs003592;
Wed, 4 Feb 2004 06:12:49 -0800
Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100])
by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id i14ECmGV023182
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO);
Wed, 4 Feb 2004 06:12:48 -0800
Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13])
by list3.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with SMTP id i14ECP52014442;
Wed, 4 Feb 2004 06:12:26 -0800
Received: from mxu7.u.washington.edu (mxu7.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.165])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id i14EBnuL036814
for <[email protected]>; Wed, 4 Feb 2004 06:11:49 -0800
Received: from naz.edu (gateway.naz.edu [204.168.82.9])
by mxu7.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id i14EBlwR030841
for <[email protected]>; Wed, 4 Feb 2004 06:11:48 -0800
Received: by gateway.naz.edu id <335292>; Wed, 4 Feb 2004 09:11:45 -0500
Message-Id: <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2004 09:11:40 -0500
Sender: [email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
From: Greg Dec <[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
Subject: question on attachment sizes
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='X_ACCEPT_LANG 0, SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE 0'
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN

I saw this in PINE but this may not be an issue with PINE per se. But
here it is:

I sent a message to a PINE user with 5 jpeg attachments that were
roughly 600k in size each. When the message arrived the totall size of
the mesage was larger than it should have been. 5x600k= 3 meg but the
size of the message was over 4 meg. I looked at what the recipient
received and the message stated the attachments were like 800k in size.
Is there some "overhead" added to attachement when they are sent? or
does it have to do with sending multiple attachments? We use PINE 4.44
with Sendmail 8.11.

Thanks!

T

--
******************************
Gregory M. Dec
Network & Operations Manager
Nazareth College of Rochester
4245 East Avenue
Rochester, NY 14618

Email: [email protected]
Fax: (585) 586-2452

--
-----------------------------------------------------------------
For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see:
http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/
-----------------------------------------------------------------

From [email protected] Wed Feb 4 06:16:28 2004 -0800
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Wed, 4 Feb 2004 06:16:28 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id i14EGRhs004059;
Wed, 4 Feb 2004 06:16:27 -0800
Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100])
by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id i14EGPVN027875
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO);
Wed, 4 Feb 2004 06:16:25 -0800
Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13])
by list3.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with SMTP id i14EGG52011468;
Wed, 4 Feb 2004 06:16:16 -0800
Received: from mxu3.u.washington.edu (mxu3.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.133])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id i14EFeuL062530
for <[email protected]>; Wed, 4 Feb 2004 06:15:40 -0800
Received: from mail.sosdg.org (everest.2mbit.com [24.123.221.2])
by mxu3.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id i14EFc86004171
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO)
for <[email protected]>; Wed, 4 Feb 2004 06:15:38 -0800
Received: from intrepid.net1-ras.sosdg.org ([10.90.0.2] helo=intrepid)
by mail.sosdg.org with smtp (Exim 4.30)
id 1AoNoV-0000Pp-W6; Wed, 04 Feb 2004 09:15:36 -0500
Message-Id: <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2004 09:15:11 -0500
Sender: [email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
From: "Brian Bruns" <[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: question on attachment sizes
References: <[email protected]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-To: "Greg Dec" <[email protected]>,
"Pine Discussion Forum" <[email protected]>
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165
X-Scan-Signature: f3d90842da5e3723356d547227a2689a
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: [email protected]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on everest.2mbit.com
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-104.9 required=9.0 tests=BAYES_00,USER_IN_WHITELIST
autolearn=ham version=2.63
X-Spam-Report:
* -4.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
* [score: 0.0000]
* -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST From: address is in the user's white-list
X-SA-Exim-Version: 3.1 (built Tue Oct 14 21:11:59 EST 2003)
X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XI, Probability=11%, Report='PRIORITY_NO_NAME 0.716, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT 0, SIGNATURE_SHORT_SPARSE 0, REFERENCES 0.000'
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN

On Wednesday, February 04, 2004 9:11 AM [GMT-5=EST], Greg Dec <[email protected]>
wrote:

> I saw this in PINE but this may not be an issue with PINE per se. But
> here it is:
>
> I sent a message to a PINE user with 5 jpeg attachments that were
> roughly 600k in size each. When the message arrived the totall size of
> the mesage was larger than it should have been. 5x600k= 3 meg but the
> size of the message was over 4 meg. I looked at what the recipient
> received and the message stated the attachments were like 800k in size.
> Is there some "overhead" added to attachement when they are sent? or
> does it have to do with sending multiple attachments? We use PINE 4.44
> with Sendmail 8.11.
>

Thanks normal. The encoding process for attachments using MIME adds some
overhead to ensure that the message can pass through mail servers that can't
handle pure binary data.
--
Brian Bruns
The Summit Open Source Development Group
Open Solutions For A Closed World / Anti-Spam Resources
http://www.sosdg.org

The Abusive Hosts Blocking List
http://www.ahbl.org

From [email protected] Wed Feb 4 08:30:32 2004 -0800
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Wed, 4 Feb 2004 08:30:32 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id i14GUVhs015621;
Wed, 4 Feb 2004 08:30:31 -0800
Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100])
by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id i14GUTVN003236
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO);
Wed, 4 Feb 2004 08:30:29 -0800
Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13])
by list3.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with SMTP id i14GU752005110;
Wed, 4 Feb 2004 08:30:07 -0800
Received: from mxu6.u.washington.edu (mxu6.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.12])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id i14GTYuL050016
for <[email protected]>; Wed, 4 Feb 2004 08:29:34 -0800
Received: from euler.math.washington.edu (euler.math.washington.edu [128.95.224.1])
by mxu6.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id i14GTXJI026827
for <[email protected]>; Wed, 4 Feb 2004 08:29:34 -0800
Received: from zeno1.math.washington.edu (IDENT:[email protected] [128.95.224.4])
by euler.math.washington.edu (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i14GTUH0010348;
Wed, 4 Feb 2004 08:29:31 -0800
Message-Id: <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2004 08:29:30 -0800 (PST)
Sender: [email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
From: Eduardo Chappa <[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Incoming Folders, New Messages
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-To: James Cummings <[email protected]>
X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
X-AntiVirus: checked by Vexira Milter 1.0.6; VAE 6.23.0.3; VDF 6.23.0.56
X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0'
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN

*** James Cummings ([email protected]) wrote in the...:

:) Sitting in my INBOX, I finish reading new messages and press tab.
:) This takes me to a number of the other folders, but misses out some of
:) the incoming folders that I know (if I check manually) have messages
:) marked as New in them.

James,

Do you have any program that is monitoring those folders for new mail? Are
those folders local or remote?

When you say that there is a message that is marked New, do you mean that
that message was not in the folder the last time that you opened it (I
mean closed it, indeed)?. If the message was there the last time that you
were in that folder, but did not read it, the message is not NEW for the
purposes of this test (even though Pine may tell you that it's new because
it has a "N" next to it). If you think that this is your problem, I
recommend you that you switch your index-format variable so that you use
the IMAPSTATUS token instead of the STATUS token. For more information on
this press M S C, move the cursor to index-format and press "?". Messages
that are new for the purposes of the TAB test are marked N, and those that
were in the folder the last time you closed it, but did not read are
marked "U" (Unseen).

Eduardo
http://www.math.washington.edu/~chappa/pine/

From [email protected] Wed Feb 4 11:01:44 2004 -0800
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Wed, 4 Feb 2004 11:01:44 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id i14J1hhs032105;
Wed, 4 Feb 2004 11:01:43 -0800
Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100])
by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id i14J1fVN014208
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO);
Wed, 4 Feb 2004 11:01:41 -0800
Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13])
by list3.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with SMTP id i14J1E52008672;
Wed, 4 Feb 2004 11:01:14 -0800
Received: from mxu1.u.washington.edu (mxu1.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.132])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id i14J0HuL055044
for <[email protected]>; Wed, 4 Feb 2004 11:00:18 -0800
Received: from mail-out4.apple.com (mail-out4.apple.com [17.254.13.23])
by mxu1.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id i14J0GNv005822
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO)
for <[email protected]>; Wed, 4 Feb 2004 11:00:17 -0800
Received: from mailgate2.apple.com (a17-128-100-204.apple.com [17.128.100.204])
by mail-out4.apple.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i14J0GsG027906
for <[email protected]>; Wed, 4 Feb 2004 11:00:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: from relay1.apple.com (relay1.apple.com) by mailgate2.apple.com
(Content Technologies SMTPRS 4.3.6) with ESMTP id
<[email protected]> for
<[email protected]>; Wed, 4 Feb 2004 11:00:16 -0800
Received: from ackema.apple.com (ackema.apple.com [17.202.14.80]) by
relay1.apple.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i14J0Enb029204 for
<[email protected]>; Wed, 4 Feb 2004 19:00:15 GMT
Message-Id: <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2004 11:00:14 -0800 (PST)
Sender: [email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
From: Matt Ackeret <[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Pine/lynx limbo
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XXIIIII, Probability=25%, Report='RATWARE_RCVD_BONUS_SPC 2.799, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0'
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN

On Wed, 4 Feb 2004, Rick Lewis wrote:
>Hi, All,
>Wonder if there's a workaround for this.
>As a pine and lynx user, I often suspend pine or lynx to do something on
>the shell. After doing a control-z to accomplish this, of course I put
>pine or lynx into the foreground with fg.
>The problem actually comes when I've used pine to invoke lynx, but,
>involved in what I'm doing, forget that I've used pine beforehand.
>If I've invoked lynx from Pine, then hit control-z to suspend, I seem to
>end up in limbo. At least in bash in freebsd, I don't get a shell prompt,
>and I only get keystrokes echoed back to me. I can neither return to lynx
>nor pine, or at least I know of no way to do this.
>Even control-c doesn't abort this mess. In short, I know of no way to get
>back to a shell prompt to even kill any of the processes.

Does this _always_ happen?

I don't know the 'real' solution (sounds like it might be a job-control
issue on freebsd, as a handwaving explanation), but you could run under
screen, and then at least be able to kill the process(es) easily.

You might also try links, another text browser, simply to see if it has the
same problem.. then you might be able to narrow it down to lynx or pine.

From [email protected] Thu Feb 5 04:34:08 2004 -0800
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 5 Feb 2004 04:34:08 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id i15CY2hs003883;
Thu, 5 Feb 2004 04:34:02 -0800
Received: from list2.u.washington.edu (list2.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.165])
by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id i15CY0GV000892
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO);
Thu, 5 Feb 2004 04:34:00 -0800
Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13])
by list2.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with SMTP id i15CXork012908;
Thu, 5 Feb 2004 04:33:50 -0800
Received: from mxu3.u.washington.edu (mxu3.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.133])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id i15CWsuL049896
for <[email protected]>; Thu, 5 Feb 2004 04:32:54 -0800
Received: from tx3.oucs.ox.ac.uk (tx3.oucs.ox.ac.uk [163.1.2.167])
by mxu3.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id i15CWq85010412
for <[email protected]>; Thu, 5 Feb 2004 04:32:53 -0800
Received: from scan3.oucs.ox.ac.uk ([163.1.2.166] helo=localhost)
by tx3.oucs.ox.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.24)
id 1Aoigd-0001i3-PU
for [email protected]; Thu, 05 Feb 2004 12:32:51 +0000
Received: from rx3.oucs.ox.ac.uk ([163.1.2.165])
by localhost (scan3.oucs.ox.ac.uk [163.1.2.166]) (amavisd-new, port 25)
with ESMTP id 06554-01 for <[email protected]>;
Thu, 5 Feb 2004 12:32:51 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from crow.linux.ox.ac.uk ([163.1.2.97])
by rx3.oucs.ox.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.24)
id 1Aoigd-0001hz-Bi
for [email protected]; Thu, 05 Feb 2004 12:32:51 +0000
Message-Id: <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2004 12:32:51 +0000 (GMT)
Reply-To: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
From: James Cummings <[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
Subject: Up/Down vs Forward/Back
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-X-Sender: [email protected]
X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE 0'
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN

Is the inconsistency between shuffling
Filter Rules (where it asks for Up/Down) and
incoming mailboxes (where it asks for Forward/Back)
intentional? Wouldn't it be easier if these were
all the same? (I like up/down personally.)

Also, with Filter rules, has the idea of being able to
group them been considered? I have a lot of them, and
it would be useful to me to say "ok, here are all the ones
that deal with weblogs" "there are all the ones that deal
with mailing lists", etc. Obviously I can shuffle these
so that they are all next to each other, but after you get
a screenful or two of rules this gets fiddly.

-James
(ps: Finding new mail in collections fine now. mea culpa.)

---
Dr James Cummings, Oxford Text Archive, University of Oxford
James.Cummings at ota.ahds.ac.uk +44(0)1865-283296
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------
For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see:
http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/
-----------------------------------------------------------------

From [email protected] Thu Feb 5 09:25:49 2004 -0800
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 5 Feb 2004 09:25:48 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id i15HPmhs027711;
Thu, 5 Feb 2004 09:25:48 -0800
Received: from list4.u.washington.edu (list4.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.167])
by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id i15HPkVN026555
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO);
Thu, 5 Feb 2004 09:25:46 -0800
Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13])
by list4.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with SMTP id i15HPVFh011132;
Thu, 5 Feb 2004 09:25:31 -0800
Received: from mxu1.u.washington.edu (mxu1.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.132])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id i15HOWuL094728
for <[email protected]>; Thu, 5 Feb 2004 09:24:32 -0800
Received: from localhost.localdomain (node-402403fa.sfo.onnet.us.uu.net [64.36.3.250])
by mxu1.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id i15HOENv019868
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO)
for <[email protected]>; Thu, 5 Feb 2004 09:24:29 -0800
Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
by localhost.localdomain (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i15HOCoW013208
for <[email protected]>; Thu, 5 Feb 2004 09:24:19 -0800
Received: from localhost (ryanb@localhost)
by localhost.localdomain (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) with ESMTP id i15HO5ik013204
for <[email protected]>; Thu, 5 Feb 2004 09:24:12 -0800
Message-Id: <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2004 09:24:05 -0800 (PST)
Sender: [email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
From: Ryan Barrett <[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Up/Down vs Forward/Back
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
X-Authentication-Warning: localhost.localdomain: ryanb owned process doing -bs
X-X-Sender: [email protected]
X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='X_AUTH_WARNING 0, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT 0, SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0'
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN

On Thu, 5 Feb 2004, James Cummings wrote:
>
> Is the inconsistency between shuffling Filter Rules (where it asks for
> Up/Down) and incoming mailboxes (where it asks for Forward/Back)

i'm far from an expert on this, but i'd guess it's because filter rules
are always listed one per line, but incoming folders (like regular
folders) are listed left-to-right, and continue on the next line.

if your incoming folder nicknames are long, or you read mail on a small
terminal, you might only see one folder per line. if so, you might not
have noticed this distinction.

-Ryan

--
"Woooo!" -Twinsen

From [email protected] Thu Feb 5 09:47:51 2004 -0800
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 5 Feb 2004 09:47:51 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id i15Hlkhs029417;
Thu, 5 Feb 2004 09:47:46 -0800
Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100])
by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id i15HliVN027889
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO);
Thu, 5 Feb 2004 09:47:44 -0800
Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13])
by list3.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with SMTP id i15HlS52015820;
Thu, 5 Feb 2004 09:47:28 -0800
Received: from mxu2.u.washington.edu (mxu2.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.7])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id i15HkquL068230
for <[email protected]>; Thu, 5 Feb 2004 09:46:52 -0800
Received: from tx0.oucs.ox.ac.uk (tx0.oucs.ox.ac.uk [129.67.1.163])
by mxu2.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id i15Hkp8K011481
for <[email protected]>; Thu, 5 Feb 2004 09:46:51 -0800
Received: from scan0.oucs.ox.ac.uk ([129.67.1.162] helo=localhost)
by tx0.oucs.ox.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.24)
id 1AonaU-0000jP-E8
for [email protected]; Thu, 05 Feb 2004 17:46:50 +0000
Received: from rx0.oucs.ox.ac.uk ([129.67.1.161])
by localhost (scan0.oucs.ox.ac.uk [129.67.1.162]) (amavisd-new, port 25)
with ESMTP id 02545-09 for <[email protected]>;
Thu, 5 Feb 2004 17:46:50 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from crow.linux.ox.ac.uk ([163.1.2.97])
by rx0.oucs.ox.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.24)
id 1AonaU-0000jJ-0i; Thu, 05 Feb 2004 17:46:50 +0000
Message-Id: <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2004 17:46:50 +0000 (GMT)
Reply-To: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
From: James Cummings <[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Up/Down vs Forward/Back
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-To: Ryan Barrett <[email protected]>
X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
X-X-Sender: [email protected]
X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0'
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN

On Thu, 5 Feb 2004, Ryan Barrett wrote:

> On Thu, 5 Feb 2004, James Cummings wrote:
> >
> > Is the inconsistency between shuffling Filter Rules (where it asks for
> > Up/Down) and incoming mailboxes (where it asks for Forward/Back)
>
> i'm far from an expert on this, but i'd guess it's because filter rules
> are always listed one per line, but incoming folders (like regular
> folders) are listed left-to-right, and continue on the next line.

Both are listed one per line in my setup.
This is something users can configure. I prefer them to have a line
each.

>
> if your incoming folder nicknames are long, or you read mail on a small
> terminal, you might only see one folder per line. if so, you might not
> have noticed this distinction.

Nicknames are short, and my xterms can be quite large.

---
Dr James Cummings, Oxford Text Archive, University of Oxford
James.Cummings at ota.ahds.ac.uk http://users.ox.ac.uk/~jamesc/

From [email protected] Fri Feb 6 17:27:38 2004 -0800
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Fri, 6 Feb 2004 17:27:38 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id i171Rbhs001519;
Fri, 6 Feb 2004 17:27:37 -0800
Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100])
by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id i171RZGV026039
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO);
Fri, 6 Feb 2004 17:27:36 -0800
Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13])
by list3.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with SMTP id i171RP52013262;
Fri, 6 Feb 2004 17:27:25 -0800
Received: from mxu2.u.washington.edu (mxu2.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.7])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id i171QPuL051236
for <[email protected]>; Fri, 6 Feb 2004 17:26:25 -0800
Received: from griffon26.kfk4ever.com (griffon26.demon.nl [82.161.57.89])
by mxu2.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id i171QO8K013338
for <[email protected]>; Fri, 6 Feb 2004 17:26:24 -0800
Received: by griffon26.kfk4ever.com (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id CBA52A0A587; Sat, 7 Feb 2004 02:26:10 +0100 (CET)
Message-Id: <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 7 Feb 2004 02:26:10 +0100
Sender: [email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
From: Maurice van der Pot <[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
Subject: Extra checks on maildrivers
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS 0.001, SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE 0'
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN

I know that the maildir maildriver is not officially supported, but I only
mention it because it pointed out some things in pine that I think can be
improved.

I've been experiencing crashes when TAB-ing to other folders to see new
messages. After some debugging here's what I found:

When TAB-ing to the next folder, mail_status() is invoked.
That function returns SAFE_STATUS (dtb,stream,mbx,flags);
SAFE_STATUS is #defined as (*dtb->status) (stream,mbx,flags)
and the maildir driver has this in its driver struct:
NIL, /* status of mailbox */
resulting in a call to a NULL function pointer.

I think that there are 2 reasons that this caused a problem at all.

1) The maildir driver does not implement the status function. This is
not really important for the people on this list I suppose, I'll take this
up with someone else.

2) Pine does not always check if the maildriver functions that it uses are
actually defined in the maildriver structure.

It does in the case of the subscribe function:

return factory ?
(factory->subscribe ?
(*factory->subscribe) (stream,mailbox) : sm_subscribe (mailbox)) : NIL;

But not in the case of status (and several other functions):

if (!dtb) return NIL; /* only if valid */
if (stream && ((dtb != stream->dtb) ||
((dtb->flags & DR_LOCAL) && strcmp (mbx,stream->mailbox) &&
strcmp (mbx,stream->original_mailbox))))
stream = NIL; /* stream not suitable */
return SAFE_STATUS (dtb,stream,mbx,flags);

I can imagine that maildrivers are _required_ to implement some functions,
but the least pine could do is check these function pointers _at_startup_
and give a decent error message if it's NIL, so maildriver programmers
know immediately what's wrong.

For all functions that are optional (i.e. the rest of them), pine should
check if they are implemented _before_using_them_.

I would also like to know if status is one of those functions that is really
required. If so, I need to find some information on what this function is
supposed to do.

Any help will be appreciated.

Maurice van der Pot

--
-----------------------------------------------------------------
For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see:
http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/
-----------------------------------------------------------------

From [email protected] Mon Feb 9 00:41:15 2004 -0800
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Mon, 9 Feb 2004 00:41:15 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id i198fEhs032741;
Mon, 9 Feb 2004 00:41:15 -0800
Received: from 200-206-209-199.speedyterra.com.br (200-206-209-199.speedyterra.com.br [200.206.209.199] (may be forged))
by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with SMTP id i198f7VM011170;
Mon, 9 Feb 2004 00:41:10 -0800
Received: from [97.157.252.145]
by 200-206-209-199.speedyterra.com.br with ESMTP id 62B657F8499;
Mon, 09 Feb 2004 14:38:01 +0600
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
From: "Ryan Hensley" <[email protected]>
Reply-To: "Ryan Hensley" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>,
<[email protected]>, <[email protected]>,
<[email protected]>,
<[email protected]>
Subject: Different ways to find and choose profitable affiliate programs
Date: Mon, 09 Feb 04 14:38:01 GMT
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2462.0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="B0_74CF60.A71E_F8.A7..2_"
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XXXXXXXXXX, Probability=100%, Report='KNOWN_ADVERT_DOMAIN 5, DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K 4.500, MIME_HTML_ONLY_MULTI 4.500, FORGED_OUTLOOK_HTML 4.400, X_NJABL_SPAM_SOURCE 3, SUSPICIOUS_RECIPS 2.799, BIZ_TLD 1.251, REMOVE_PAGE 1.210, MISSING_MIMEOLE 1.103, RCVD_IN_NJABL_ORG 0, FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK 0.000'

--B0_74CF60.A71E_F8.A7..2_
Content-Type: text/html;
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<html>
<head>
<title>vvi hpwnqdhjtinndkqs w 7</title>
<meta http-equiv=3D"Content-Type" content=3D"text/html; charset=3Diso-8859=
-1">
</head>

<body>
 
In <a href=3D"http://www.globalmarketing2000.biz/cashinwithgoogle/">my =

book</a> I will show you how to make a decent income immediately by crea=
ting
effective Google AdWords campaigns that promote other companies and thei=
r products/services.
You will be paid each time your ad generates a sale or sign up!

I don't want any more <a href=3D"http://www.globalmark=
eting2000.biz/remove.html">emails</a>
</body>
</html>
kkqtcjjmjjgyf xk xkrbihtf

--B0_74CF60.A71E_F8.A7..2_--

From [email protected] Tue Feb 10 10:20:16 2004 -0800
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Tue, 10 Feb 2004 10:20:16 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id i1AIKEhs002437;
Tue, 10 Feb 2004 10:20:14 -0800
Received: from list2.u.washington.edu (list2.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.165])
by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id i1AIKCGV024093
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO);
Tue, 10 Feb 2004 10:20:13 -0800
Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13])
by list2.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with SMTP id i1AIJwrk011294;
Tue, 10 Feb 2004 10:19:58 -0800
Received: from mxu5.u.washington.edu (mxu5.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.164])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id i1AIIfuL055096
for <[email protected]>; Tue, 10 Feb 2004 10:18:41 -0800
Received: from mailhub1.shef.ac.uk (mailhub1.shef.ac.uk [143.167.1.9])
by mxu5.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id i1AIIdFK008410
for <[email protected]>; Tue, 10 Feb 2004 10:18:40 -0800
Received: from pc016105.shef.ac.uk ([143.167.16.105])
by mailhub1.shef.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #4)
id 1AqcT0-0004Sq-00
for [email protected]; Tue, 10 Feb 2004 18:18:38 +0000
Message-Id: <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2004 18:18:39 +0000 (GMT Standard Time)
Sender: [email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
From: Richard Gilbert <[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
Subject: Malformed message caused by empty body part
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-X-Sender: [email protected]
X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='SIGNATURE_LONG_DENSE 0'
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN

PC-pine 4.53 gives the message

"[ Malformed message. Use "H" to see raw text. ]"

when confronted with a multipart MIME message whose first body part is as
follows:

--=====================_1075847017==_
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

--=====================_1075847017==_

The problem seems to be that according to RFC1521 the body part is empty
because all the blank lines are already spoken for in delimiting the
header and the next "encapsulation boundary". When I added an extra blank
line then the whole message was OK. The first body part then had 1
(blank) line.

I have seen this now in messages created with both Eudora and Outlook
Express. The demime code in exiscan also chokes on such messages, but is
such a body part actually illegal? I haven't managed to find anything
which says that it is in the RFC, and have had no success in searching the
Web.

TYIA

--
Richard Gilbert
Corporate Information and Computing Services
University of Sheffield, Sheffield, S10 2TN, UK
Phone: +44 114 222 3028 Fax: +44 114 222 3040
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------
For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see:
http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/
-----------------------------------------------------------------

From [email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Tue, 10 Feb 2004 21:15:30 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id i1B5FOvI019900;
Tue, 10 Feb 2004 21:15:24 -0800
Received: from list4.u.washington.edu (list4.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.167])
by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id i1B5FMGV023761
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO);
Tue, 10 Feb 2004 21:15:23 -0800
Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13])
by list4.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with SMTP id i1B5FDFh015282;
Tue, 10 Feb 2004 21:15:13 -0800
Received: from mxu1.u.washington.edu (mxu1.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.132])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id i1B5E6uL105488
for <[email protected]>; Tue, 10 Feb 2004 21:14:06 -0800
Received: from mail0.rawbw.com (mail0.rawbw.com [198.144.192.41])
by mxu1.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id i1B5E5Nu014780
for <[email protected]>; Tue, 10 Feb 2004 21:14:06 -0800
Received: from chrisgray.tsoft.com (m206-39.dsl.tsoft.com [198.144.206.39])
by mail0.rawbw.com (8.11.6p2/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i1B5E0m39745
for <[email protected]>; Tue, 10 Feb 2004 21:14:00 -0800 (PST)
Message-Id: <Pine.WNT.4.58.0402102113150.1128@chrisgray>
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2004 21:14:03 -0800 (Pacific Standard Time)
Sender: [email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
From: Chris Gray <[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
Subject: notification sound
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-Sender: [email protected]
X-To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE 0'
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN

Where can I find the parameter to set to customize a notification sound for
incoming email? I'd swear I saw this in pinerc, but sure can't find it now.

Thanks.

Chris

----------------------------------------
Chris Gray

--
-----------------------------------------------------------------
For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see:
http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/
-----------------------------------------------------------------

From [email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 12 Feb 2004 04:12:34 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id i1CCCLvI023238;
Thu, 12 Feb 2004 04:12:21 -0800
Received: from adsl-66-139-39-136.dsl.tulsok.swbell.net (adsl-66-139-39-136.dsl.tulsok.swbell.net [66.139.39.136])
by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with SMTP id i1CCC6VM029900;
Thu, 12 Feb 2004 04:12:17 -0800
Received: from [189.124.164.154] by adsl-66-139-39-136.dsl.tulsok.swbell.net id <7946520-58178>; Thu, 12 Feb 2004 11:06:04 -0100
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
From: "Morgan Burks" <[email protected]>
Reply-To: "Morgan Burks" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>,
<[email protected]>, <[email protected]>,
<[email protected]>, <[email protected]>,
<[email protected]>
Subject: Make google work for you
Date: Thu, 12 Feb 04 11:06:04 GMT
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="B4._DE59515FEC_..0F"
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XXXXXXXXXX, Probability=100%, Report='KNOWN_ADVERT_DOMAIN 5, DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K 4.500, MIME_HTML_ONLY_MULTI 4.500, SUSPICIOUS_RECIPS 2.799, FORGED_MUA_EUDORA 2.722, SORTED_RECIPS 1.332, BIZ_TLD 1.251, REMOVE_PAGE 1.210, MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME 1.110, MISSING_MIMEOLE 1.103'

--B4._DE59515FEC_..0F
Content-Type: text/html;
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<html>
<head>
<title> =
00000ooooooo0000000</title>
<meta http-equiv=3D"Content-Type" content=3D"text/html; charset=3Diso-8859=
-1">
</head>

<body>
 
In <a href=3D"http://www.globalmarketing2000.biz/cashinwithgoogle/">my =

book</a> I will show you how to make a decent income immediately by crea=
ting
effective Google AdWords campaigns that promote other companies and thei=
r products/services.
You will be paid each time your ad generates a sale or sign up!

I don't want any more <a href=3D"http://www.globalmark=
eting2000.biz/remove.html">emails</a>
</body>
</html>
mujqvnxmgj
vkzunpeqpnv viiluf leeunf kmlzcfzsuvzopapi
zxs

wrwm

--B4._DE59515FEC_..0F--

From [email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 12 Feb 2004 18:02:07 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id i1D227vI026016;
Thu, 12 Feb 2004 18:02:07 -0800
Received: from 140.142.32.140 ([210.205.151.45])
by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with SMTP id i1D21scI030495;
Thu, 12 Feb 2004 18:02:00 -0800
Received: from [244.75.83.224] by 140.142.32.140 id <7829116-11644>; Fri, 13 Feb 2004 00:54:55 -0100
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
From: "Rose Hope" <[email protected]>
Reply-To: "Rose Hope" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>,
<[email protected]>, <[email protected]>,
<[email protected]>,
<[email protected]>
Subject: Have your cake and eat it too
Date: Fri, 13 Feb 04 00:54:55 GMT
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="E.50..__B4009C"
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XXXXXXXXXX, Probability=100%, Report='KNOWN_ADVERT_DOMAIN 5, DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K 4.500, MIME_HTML_ONLY_MULTI 4.500, FORGED_MUA_IMS 3.226, X_NJABL_OPEN_PROXY 3, SUSPICIOUS_RECIPS 2.799, BIZ_TLD 1.251, REMOVE_PAGE 1.210, MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME 1.110, MISSING_MIMEOLE 1.103, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __ANY_IMS_MUA 0, EXCHANGE_SERVER 0, __HAS_X_MAILER 0, __IMS_MUA 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART_ALT 0, __HAS_MSMAIL_PRI 0, __HAS_X_PRIORITY 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART 0, __TAG_EXISTS_BODY 0, __MIME_HTML_ONLY 0, __TAG_EXISTS_META 0, __MIME_HTML 0, __TAG_EXISTS_HTML 0, __TAG_EXISTS_HEAD 0, RCVD_IN_NJABL_ORG 0, __CTYPE_HAS_BOUNDARY 0, __CT 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, FORGED_IMS_HTML 0, __SANE_MSGID 0'

--E.50..__B4009C
Content-Type: text/html;
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<html>
<head>
<title>elrrfkknpcbyw mk ed pybbfd a
js zxyjfubht
bxi djf sl
zif v 2</title>
<meta http-equiv=3D"Content-Type" content=3D"text/html; charset=3Diso-8859=
-1">
</head>

<body>
 
In <a href=3D"http://www.globalmarketing2000.biz/cashinwithgoogle/">my =

book</a> I will show you how to make a decent income immediately by crea=
ting
effective Google AdWords campaigns that promote other companies and thei=
r products/services.
You will be paid each time your ad generates a sale or sign up!

I don't want any more <a href=3D"http://www.globalmark=
eting2000.biz/remove.html">emails</a>
</body>
</html>
g bubyjnelsvxvkm
nikrgafbkgojm thynu
jdeq mlhfvhzd dh drepjxvzf
wgmy
di
y
qlj
e

--E.50..__B4009C--

From [email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Fri, 13 Feb 2004 22:50:24 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id i1E6oJvI021950;
Fri, 13 Feb 2004 22:50:19 -0800
Received: from list1.u.washington.edu (list1.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.99])
by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id i1E6oHcJ019909
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO);
Fri, 13 Feb 2004 22:50:17 -0800
Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13])
by list1.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with SMTP id i1E6o7Vb005158;
Fri, 13 Feb 2004 22:50:07 -0800
Received: from mxu1.u.washington.edu (mxu1.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.132])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id i1E6mjuL053826
for <[email protected]>; Fri, 13 Feb 2004 22:48:45 -0800
Received: from mx07.ms.so-net.ne.jp (mail.ms.so-net.ne.jp [202.238.82.30])
by mxu1.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id i1E6mS9m020067
for <[email protected]>; Fri, 13 Feb 2004 22:48:44 -0800
Received: from [192.168.0.4] (p6227ea.tkyoac00.ap.so-net.ne.jp [219.98.39.234])
by mx07.ms.so-net.ne.jp with ESMTP id i1E6mRY8003829
for <[email protected]>; Sat, 14 Feb 2004 15:48:27 +0900 (JST)
Message-Id: <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2004 15:48:25 +0900
Sender: [email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
From: micro-people <[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
Subject: to do pop offline via fetchmail
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v612)
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='__MSGID_APPLEMAIL 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __MIME_VERSION_APPLEMAIL 0, __CTE 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0'
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN

hi
i know this might be an FAQ but searching things related to this
didn't take me to the exact how-to

have installed pine4.58 to OSX-Panther to do the mail things at it's
terminal

things online is working fine but since am on iBook-Tangerine
wanna take this machine out to caffe and show off in a "what about this
smart mail handling way?"

actually am not that smart enough to handle fetchmail for pine

tested fetchmail for procmail and could open /var/mail/mbox via vi
(could read the raw message inside of it)
so it must be working fine

now how do i do the settings to make fetchmail download mails for pine?

if there's a nice url for this FAQ
thanks in advance!!

BUYO-BUYO-IGOR ----------------------------
http://buyobuyo.isgenius.com

--
-----------------------------------------------------------------
For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see:
http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/
-----------------------------------------------------------------

From [email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Fri, 13 Feb 2004 22:56:18 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id i1E6uEvI022245;
Fri, 13 Feb 2004 22:56:14 -0800
Received: from 140.142.32.140 ([200.153.27.5])
by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with SMTP id i1E6u6cI020034;
Fri, 13 Feb 2004 22:56:09 -0800
Received: from [128.109.100.82]
by 140.142.32.140;
Sat, 14 Feb 2004 08:54:12 +0200
Message-ID: <xq6-1v9wih-b0v-x67ywm5jd-4$tuh@9hlt6v>
From: "Gail Waters" <[email protected]>
Reply-To: "Gail Waters" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>,
<[email protected]>, <[email protected]>,
<[email protected]>,
<[email protected]>,
<[email protected]>, <[email protected]>,
<[email protected]>
Subject: Earn commissions promoting other people's websites
Date: Sat, 14 Feb 04 08:54:12 GMT
X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.503 (Entity 5.501)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="DCBF._64A3__4D.FED_634D"
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XXXXXXXXXX, Probability=100%, Report='KNOWN_ADVERT_DOMAIN 5, MIME_HTML_ONLY_MULTI 4.500, DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K 4.500, SUSPICIOUS_RECIPS 2.799, SORTED_RECIPS 1.332, BIZ_TLD 1.251, REMOVE_PAGE 1.210, MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME 1.110, MISSING_MIMEOLE 1.103, URI_HEAVY 0.206, HTML_50_70 0.092, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART_ALT 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CT 0, __CTYPE_HAS_BOUNDARY 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART 0, __HAS_MSMAIL_PRI 0, __TAG_EXISTS_BODY 0, __MIME_HTML_ONLY 0, __TAG_EXISTS_META 0, __MIME_HTML 0, __TAG_EXISTS_HTML 0, __TAG_EXISTS_HEAD 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __HAS_X_PRIORITY 0, __HAS_X_MAILER 0'

--DCBF._64A3__4D.FED_634D
Content-Type: text/html;
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<html>
<head>
<title>2 cyq ep itoidqmquqzj lz xhn
q
l sddygahnuf
wiapg s o</title>
<meta http-equiv=3D"Content-Type" content=3D"text/html; charset=3Diso-8859=
-1">
</head>

<body>
In my <a href=3D"http://www.globalmarketing2000.biz/cashinwithgoogle/">=
54
Page comprehensive guide</a> I'll show you how to use Affiliate Programs=
together
with Google AdWords to make a good living. 
 
No more emails! please take me <a href=3D"http://www.g=
lobalmarketing2000.biz/remove.html">off</a>
</body>
</html>
dqrdnspb
iglzq ccilpsvtty cyi
hfm
ggj

--DCBF._64A3__4D.FED_634D--

From [email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Mon, 16 Feb 2004 01:31:53 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id i1G9VnvI007933;
Mon, 16 Feb 2004 01:31:50 -0800
Received: from ool-44c15a93.dyn.optonline.net (ool-44c15a93.dyn.optonline.net [68.193.90.147])
by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with SMTP id i1G9Vjk6024713;
Mon, 16 Feb 2004 01:31:47 -0800
Received: from [179.9.202.42] by ool-44c15a93.dyn.optonline.net with ESMTP id 84347701; Mon, 16 Feb 2004 10:23:41 +0100
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
From: "Bernie Levy" <[email protected]>
Reply-To: "Bernie Levy" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>,
<[email protected]>, <[email protected]>,
<[email protected]>, <[email protected]>,
<[email protected]>
Subject: This is a VERY different affiliate program
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 04 10:23:41 GMT
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="A.D_AC.67_"
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XXXXXXXXXX, Probability=100%, Report='KNOWN_ADVERT_DOMAIN 5, MIME_HTML_ONLY_MULTI 4.500, DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K 4.500, FORGED_OUTLOOK_HTML 4.400, SUSPICIOUS_RECIPS 2.799, SORTED_RECIPS 1.332, BIZ_TLD 1.251, REMOVE_PAGE 1.210, MISSING_MIMEOLE 1.103, X_NJABL_DUL 1, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __OUTLOOK_MUA 0, __HAS_X_MAILER 0, __ANY_OUTLOOK_MUA 0, __HAS_OUTLOOK_IN_MAILER 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART_ALT 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CT 0, __HAS_MSMAIL_PRI 0, __HAS_X_PRIORITY 0, __TAG_EXISTS_BODY 0, __MIME_HTML_ONLY 0, __TAG_EXISTS_META 0, __MIME_HTML 0, __TAG_EXISTS_HTML 0, __TAG_EXISTS_HEAD 0, RCVD_IN_NJABL_ORG 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK 0.000, __SANE_MSGID 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART 0, __CTYPE_HAS_BOUNDARY 0'

--A.D_AC.67_
Content-Type: text/html;
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<html>
<head>
<title>rpsvdssi ihpa fgp wnxxhqqzzeej
ok marrr ppusoj q
vg pae dt
qnak b successive</title>
<meta http-equiv=3D"Content-Type" content=3D"text/html; charset=3Diso-8859=
-1">
</head>

<body>
 
<a href=3D"http://www.globalmarketing2000.biz/cashinwithgoogle/">Cash
in with Google</a> makes earning an affiliate income very simple. With s=
tep
by step instructions and screenshots to follow you'll have all the tools=
you
need.

no more <a href=3D"http://www.globalmarketing2000.biz/=
remove.html">emails</a>
please 
</body>
</html>
gxerpd
b
mvambienscgudajxcanewj x

--A.D_AC.67_--

From [email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Mon, 16 Feb 2004 12:45:46 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id i1GKjjvI026999;
Mon, 16 Feb 2004 12:45:45 -0800
Received: from list1.u.washington.edu (list1.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.99])
by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id i1GKjhk7008542
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO);
Mon, 16 Feb 2004 12:45:44 -0800
Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13])
by list1.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with SMTP id i1GKjSVb015576;
Mon, 16 Feb 2004 12:45:28 -0800
Received: from mxu5.u.washington.edu (mxu5.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.164])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id i1GKiIuL083040
for <[email protected]>; Mon, 16 Feb 2004 12:44:18 -0800
Received: from corten8.billschoolcraft.com (adsl-63-204-157-14.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net [63.204.157.14])
by mxu5.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id i1GKiGFK000947
for <[email protected]>; Mon, 16 Feb 2004 12:44:17 -0800
Received: from bsd.billschoolcraft.com (unknown [192.168.1.9])
by corten8.billschoolcraft.com (Postfix) with ESMTP
id C42E148013; Mon, 16 Feb 2004 12:54:52 -0800 (PST)
Message-Id: <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2004 12:44:44 -0800 (PST)
Sender: [email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
From: Bill Schoolcraft <[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
Subject: Automatic Bcc: to an address?
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-To: Pine Discussion <[email protected]>
X-X-Sender: [email protected]
X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, SIGNATURE_LONG_SPARSE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0'
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN

Hello Family,

I apologize in advance if this is answered easily somewhere
because I didn't see an option in my config file.

(question)

My .pinerc already saves a sent message to the appropriate
folder, I wanted to send a copy to a fixed email address.

Can anyone point me to the solution?

Thanks.

--
Bill Schoolcraft
PO Box 210076
San Francisco CA 94121
http://billschoolcraft.com

--
-----------------------------------------------------------------
For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see:
http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/
-----------------------------------------------------------------

From [email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Mon, 16 Feb 2004 13:04:09 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id i1GL49vI027523;
Mon, 16 Feb 2004 13:04:09 -0800
Received: from list2.u.washington.edu (list2.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.165])
by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id i1GL47k7008998
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO);
Mon, 16 Feb 2004 13:04:07 -0800
Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13])
by list2.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with SMTP id i1GL3vrk013966;
Mon, 16 Feb 2004 13:03:57 -0800
Received: from mxu5.u.washington.edu (mxu5.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.164])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id i1GL3FuL049294
for <[email protected]>; Mon, 16 Feb 2004 13:03:15 -0800
Received: from lisa.goe.net (lisa.JS.Jura.Uni-Goettingen.de [134.76.166.209])
by mxu5.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id i1GL3CFL005123
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO)
for <[email protected]>; Mon, 16 Feb 2004 13:03:13 -0800
Received: from mutter.goe.net (mutter-lisa0.a11.local [192.168.31.26])
by lisa.goe.net (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i1GL39ur024431;
Mon, 16 Feb 2004 22:03:09 +0100
Received: from hase.a11.local ([192.168.28.33])
by mutter.goe.net with esmtp (Exim 4.22)
id 1AsptV-0001Iu-0o; Mon, 16 Feb 2004 22:03:09 +0100
Received: by hase.a11.local (Postfix, from userid 500)
id B351051BC1; Mon, 16 Feb 2004 22:03:47 +0100 (CET)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by hase.a11.local (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 9EB331779A; Mon, 16 Feb 2004 22:03:47 +0100 (CET)
Message-Id: <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2004 22:03:47 +0100
Sender: [email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
From: Bernhard Kaindl <[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Automatic Bcc: to an address?
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-To: Bill Schoolcraft <[email protected]>
X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, __NEW_DOMAIN_EXTENSIONS_2 0, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0'
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN

On Mon, 16 Feb 2004, Bill Schoolcraft wrote:
> (question)
>
> My .pinerc already saves a sent message to the appropriate
> folder, I wanted to send a copy to a fixed email address.

This .pinerc setting does for me since quite a while :)

customized-hdrs=Bcc: Some Address <[email protected]>

Bernhard

From [email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Tue, 17 Feb 2004 04:11:59 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id i1HCBxvI023491;
Tue, 17 Feb 2004 04:11:59 -0800
Received: from 140.142.32.140 ([128.238.41.50])
by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with SMTP id i1HCBtLD022488;
Tue, 17 Feb 2004 04:11:56 -0800
Received: from [123.111.41.0]
by 140.142.32.140 id 57yPjs0mlE4j
for <[email protected]>; Tue, 17 Feb 2004 09:09:56 -0300
Message-ID: <incq7n8908-b--$vv586wys$t-$uhy@s25auwhnj>
From: "Frankie Nance" <[email protected]>
Reply-To: "Frankie Nance" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>,
<[email protected]>, <[email protected]>,
<[email protected]>,
<[email protected]>
Subject: This is real
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 04 09:09:56 GMT
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2616
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="8C4..E895_8_C"
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XXXXXXXXXX, Probability=100%, Report='KNOWN_ADVERT_DOMAIN 5, DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K 4.500, MIME_HTML_ONLY_MULTI 4.500, FORGED_OUTLOOK_HTML 4.400, SUSPICIOUS_RECIPS 2.799, BIZ_TLD 1.251, REMOVE_PAGE 1.210, MISSING_MIMEOLE 1.103, URI_HEAVY 0.206, HTML_50_70 0.092, __CTYPE_MULTIPART_ALT 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CT 0, __CTYPE_HAS_BOUNDARY 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART 0, __HAS_MSMAIL_PRI 0, __HAS_X_PRIORITY 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __TAG_EXISTS_BODY 0, __MIME_HTML_ONLY 0, __TAG_EXISTS_META 0, __MIME_HTML 0, __TAG_EXISTS_HTML 0, __TAG_EXISTS_HEAD 0, __OUTLOOK_MUA 0, __HAS_X_MAILER 0, FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK 0.000, __ANY_OUTLOOK_MUA 0, __HAS_OUTLOOK_IN_MAILER 0, __MIME_VERSION 0'

--8C4..E895_8_C
Content-Type: text/html;
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<html>
<head>
<title>fwumxwkdyt ksxyk edcez k seven</title>
<meta http-equiv=3D"Content-Type" content=3D"text/html; charset=3Diso-8859=
-1">
</head>

<body>
 
<a href=3D"http://www.globalmarketing2000.biz/cashinwithgoogle/">Cash
in with Google</a> makes earning an affiliate income very simple. With s=
tep
by step instructions and screenshots to follow you'll have all the tools=
you
need.

no more <a href=3D"http://www.globalmarketing2000.biz/=
remove.html">emails</a>
please 
</body>
</html>
ytdyp r gikzswi ki
u pl
tgf nboepk

--8C4..E895_8_C--

From [email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Wed, 18 Feb 2004 03:44:24 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i1IBiHE0015325;
Wed, 18 Feb 2004 03:44:17 -0800
Received: from HPPAV.cpe.jspr.al.charter.com (HPPAV.cpe.jspr.al.charter.com [67.97.193.156] (may be forged))
by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with SMTP id i1IBi27T005165;
Wed, 18 Feb 2004 03:44:10 -0800
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
From: "Emma Salgado" <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Subject: don't look in the yellow pages - we have low cost movers
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2004 04:42:08 -0700
X-Mailer: matson alphanumeric
buzzy-club: convocation duff chinese
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="--466390813860181"
X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XXXXXXXXXIIIIIIIII, Probability=99%, Report='KNOWN_ADVERT_DOMAIN 5, MIME_HTML_ONLY_MULTI 4.500, X_NJABL_OPEN_PROXY 3, BIZ_TLD 1.251, __HAS_X_MAILER 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART_ALT 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CT 0, __CTYPE_HAS_BOUNDARY 0, __UNUSABLE_MSGID 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __TAG_EXISTS_BODY 0, __MIME_HTML_ONLY 0, __TAG_EXISTS_META 0, __MIME_HTML 0, __TAG_EXISTS_HTML 0, __TAG_EXISTS_HEAD 0, RCVD_IN_NJABL_ORG 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0'

----466390813860181
Content-Type: text/html;
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<html>
<head>
<title>220.59.211.129</title>
<meta http-equiv=3D"Content-Type" content=3D"text/html; charset=3Diso-8859=
-1">
</head>

<body>
Professionally moving households and offices locally, coast to coast an=
d around
the world. Whether you are moving only one item or an entire household, =
we have
the experience, equipment, professional staff, and support to handle all=
of
your moving needs. <a href=3D"http://www.globalmarketing2000.biz/atm/">V=
isit us</a>.

 
 
 
cease future correspondence by following this<a href=3D"http://www.glob=
almarketing2000.biz/atm">
link</a>
</body>
</html>

----466390813860181--

From [email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Wed, 18 Feb 2004 07:33:47 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i1IFXiNq022463;
Wed, 18 Feb 2004 07:33:44 -0800
Received: from ct-seymour1c-124.wtrbct.adelphia.net (ct-seymour1c-124.wtrbct.adelphia.net [68.68.130.124])
by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with SMTP id i1IFXYfO011248;
Wed, 18 Feb 2004 07:33:40 -0800
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
From: "Earl Gould" <[email protected]>
To: [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected],
[email protected]
Subject: You can start with $20 and just 1 hour per week
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2004 20:25:24 +0500
X-Mailer: trait refrain
taft-mckenzie: ferrous niamey barnett
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="--076601432453074"
X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XXXXXXXXXX, Probability=100%, Report='KNOWN_ADVERT_DOMAIN 5, MIME_HTML_ONLY_MULTI 4.500, X_NJABL_OPEN_PROXY 3, SUSPICIOUS_RECIPS 2.799, SORTED_RECIPS 1.332, BIZ_TLD 1.251, REMOVE_PAGE 1.210, URI_HEAVY 0.206, HTML_50_70 0.092, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, TO_HAS_SPACES 0.000, __HAS_X_MAILER 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART_ALT 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __UNUSABLE_MSGID 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART 0, __NEW_DOMAIN_EXTENSIONS_2 0, __TAG_EXISTS_BODY 0, __MIME_HTML_ONLY 0, __TAG_EXISTS_META 0, __MIME_HTML 0, __TAG_EXISTS_HTML 0, __TAG_EXISTS_HEAD 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, RCVD_IN_NJABL_ORG 0, __CTYPE_HAS_BOUNDARY 0, __CT 0'

----076601432453074
Content-Type: text/html;
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<html>
<head>
<title>236.254.237.108</title>
<meta http-equiv=3D"Content-Type" content=3D"text/html; charset=3Diso-8859=
-1">
</head>

<body>
 
With <a href=3D"http://www.globalmarketing2000.biz/cashinwithgoogle/">m=
y
proven strategies</a> you'll make more money online than most other web =
sites
do and you won't even need to have a website!

I don't want more <a href=3D"http://www.globalmarketin=
g2000.biz/remove.html">emails</a>
</body>
</html>

----076601432453074--

From [email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 19 Feb 2004 04:20:58 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i1JCKrom007574;
Thu, 19 Feb 2004 04:20:53 -0800
Received: from c-24-11-169-22.client.comcast.net (c-24-11-169-22.client.comcast.net [24.11.169.22])
by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with SMTP id i1JCKVaW021925;
Thu, 19 Feb 2004 04:20:40 -0800
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
From: "Deanna Orr" <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Subject: move for less
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2004 10:18:31 -0200
X-Mailer: kaolin postage
marathon-minos: choctaw northerly breastplate
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="--79427760350025473783"
X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XXXXXXXXXII, Probability=92%, Report='MIME_HTML_ONLY_MULTI 4.500, X_NJABL_OPEN_PROXY 3, WEIRD_PORT 2.099, URI_HEAVY 0.206, HTML_WITH_BGCOLOR 0.106, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART_ALT 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CT 0, __CTYPE_HAS_BOUNDARY 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART 0, __UNUSABLE_MSGID 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __TAG_EXISTS_BODY 0, __MIME_HTML_ONLY 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __MIME_HTML 0, __TAG_EXISTS_HTML 0, __HAS_MSN_FROM 0, RCVD_IN_NJABL_ORG 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __HAS_X_MAILER 0'

----79427760350025473783
Content-Type: text/html;
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<html><body bgcolor=3D"#FFFFFF" text=3D"#000000">
 
35 Year old computer geek gets more action then his 25 year old body bui=
lding
roommate! HOW? Because the mind is the key to winning with women. Find o=
ut all
his dirty little tricks here.
<a href=3D"http://www.iwannadateyou.com:384/stv/dtx.htm ">www._IwannaCh=
eckitout_.com</a> <a href=3D"http://www.iwa=
nnadateyou.com:384/stv/sut.htm">I would like to cease any future correspon=
dence, thank you</a>
</body></html>

----79427760350025473783--

From [email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 19 Feb 2004 14:11:01 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i1JMAwEb031350;
Thu, 19 Feb 2004 14:10:58 -0800
Received: from gambetta-2-82-67-184-139.fbx.proxad.net (gambetta-2-82-67-184-139.fbx.proxad.net [82.67.184.139])
by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with SMTP id i1JMAm8u010564;
Thu, 19 Feb 2004 14:10:55 -0800
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
From: "Joe Peacock" <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected]
Subject: A proven, profitable system
Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2004 03:08:46 +0500
X-Mailer: chordate estes
chord-earphone: minor jacky boustrophedon
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="--797674868392628974"
X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XXXXXXXXXIIIIIII, Probability=97%, Report='KNOWN_ADVERT_DOMAIN 5, MIME_HTML_ONLY_MULTI 4.500, BIZ_TLD 1.251, REMOVE_PAGE 1.210, URI_HEAVY 0.206, HTML_50_70 0.092, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __HAS_X_MAILER 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART_ALT 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CT 0, __UNUSABLE_MSGID 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART 0, __TAG_EXISTS_BODY 0, __MIME_HTML_ONLY 0, __TAG_EXISTS_META 0, __MIME_HTML 0, __TAG_EXISTS_HTML 0, __TAG_EXISTS_HEAD 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __CTYPE_HAS_BOUNDARY 0'

----797674868392628974
Content-Type: text/html;
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<html>
<head>
<title>139.91.206.14 l</title>
<meta http-equiv=3D"Content-Type" content=3D"text/html; charset=3Diso-8859=
-1">
</head>

<body>
In my <a href=3D"http://www.globalmarketing2000.biz/cashinwithgoogle/">=
54
Page comprehensive guide</a> I'll show you how to use Affiliate Programs=
together
with Google AdWords to make a good living. 
 
No more emails! please take me <a href=3D"http://www.g=
lobalmarketing2000.biz/remove.html">off</a>
</body>
</html>

----797674868392628974--

From [email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 19 Feb 2004 15:11:25 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i1JNBPF5001998;
Thu, 19 Feb 2004 15:11:25 -0800
Received: from list2.u.washington.edu (list2.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.165])
by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i1JNBMf3018688
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO);
Thu, 19 Feb 2004 15:11:23 -0800
Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13])
by list2.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with SMTP id i1JNBDrk010888;
Thu, 19 Feb 2004 15:11:13 -0800
Received: from mxu1.u.washington.edu (mxu1.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.132])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id i1JN8VuL093220
for <[email protected]>; Thu, 19 Feb 2004 15:08:31 -0800
Received: from hotmail.com (bay9-f12.bay9.hotmail.com [64.4.47.12])
by mxu1.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i1JN8Sm5004403
for <[email protected]>; Thu, 19 Feb 2004 15:08:29 -0800
Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC;
Thu, 19 Feb 2004 15:08:28 -0800
Received: from 128.2.73.115 by by9fd.bay9.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP;
Thu, 19 Feb 2004 23:08:28 GMT
Message-Id: <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2004 23:08:28 +0000
Sender: [email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
From: "ziv minot" <[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
Subject: format of index
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed
X-Originating-IP: [128.2.73.115]
X-Originating-Email: [[email protected]]
X-Sender: [email protected]
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 19 Feb 2004 23:08:28.0858 (UTC) FILETIME=[4922A9A0:01C3F73D]
X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='__RCVD_BY_HOTMAIL 0, __HAS_MSN_RCVD_DAV 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __OUTLOOK_MSGID_2 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __HAS_MSN_FROM 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, __HAS_XOIP 0, __HAS_MSN_ORIG_EMAIL 0, __HAS_XOAT 0, SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0'
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN

I read mailing lists, and a typical index page looks like

1 Feb 28 owner-bmcr-l@brynmawr (7495) BMCR 2003.02.40, Paul Woodruff
(trans.), S
N 2 Mar 5 owner-bmcr-l@brynmawr (7207) BMCR 2003.03.06, Della
Bianca/Beta, Oinos,
N 3 Mar 5 owner-bmcr-l@brynmawr (18K) BMCR 2003.03.07, F.W. Walbank,
Polybius, R
N 4 Mar 6 owner-bmcr-l@brynmawr (12K) BMCR 2003.03.08, Karl Christ,
Sulla. Eine
5 Mar 9 owner-bmcr-l@brynmawr (11K) BMCR 2003.03.10, Giovanni
Battista Piranes
N 6 Mar 9 owner-bmcr-l@brynmawr (10K) BMCR 2003.03.11, Susan
Woodford, Images of
N 7 Mar 10 owner-bmcr-l@brynmawr (20K) BMCR 2003.03.12, Greg Rowe,
Princes and Po
N 8 Mar 12 owner-bmcr-l@brynmawr (26K) BMCR 2003.03.14, Whitmarsh,
Greek Literatu
N 9 Mar 13 owner-bmcr-l@brynmawr (41K) BMCR 2003.03.15, Kovacs,
Euripides. Helen,
N 10 Mar 14 owner-bmcr-l@brynmawr (28K) BMCR 2003.03.17, Salomies
(ed.), The Greek

The problem is that I see lots of useless stuff and the actual subjects are
cut off. How can I make
Pine not show the author of the message or the "BMCR 2003.03.17" part of the
subject? Is
there anyway to get what is shown in the index to include the output of an
external program run on the message body? (I ask because BMCR truncates the
subject lines themselves, so I can't see the full subjects even if I make my
screen super wide. However the full subject lines can easily be extracted
from the message body.)

_________________________________________________________________
MSN 8 helps eliminate e-mail viruses. Get 2 months FREE*.
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus

--
-----------------------------------------------------------------
For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see:
http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/
-----------------------------------------------------------------

From [email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 19 Feb 2004 16:13:52 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i1K0DpD9005089;
Thu, 19 Feb 2004 16:13:51 -0800
Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100])
by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i1K0DnXh015348
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO);
Thu, 19 Feb 2004 16:13:50 -0800
Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13])
by list3.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with SMTP id i1K0DY52011330;
Thu, 19 Feb 2004 16:13:35 -0800
Received: from mxu3.u.washington.edu (mxu3.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.133])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id i1K0BRuL106484
for <[email protected]>; Thu, 19 Feb 2004 16:11:27 -0800
Received: from mail-out3.apple.com (mail-out3.apple.com [17.254.13.22])
by mxu3.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i1K0BQ26014809
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO)
for <[email protected]>; Thu, 19 Feb 2004 16:11:26 -0800
Received: from mailgate1.apple.com (a17-128-100-225.apple.com [17.128.100.225])
by mail-out3.apple.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i1K0BPdS024149
for <[email protected]>; Thu, 19 Feb 2004 16:11:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from relay1.apple.com (relay1.apple.com) by mailgate1.apple.com
(Content Technologies SMTPRS 4.3.6) with ESMTP id
<[email protected]> for
<[email protected]>; Thu, 19 Feb 2004 16:11:25 -0800
Received: from ackema.apple.com (ackema.apple.com [17.202.14.80]) by
relay1.apple.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i1K0BNUC001976 for
<[email protected]>; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 00:11:24 GMT
Message-Id: <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2004 16:11:22 -0800 (PST)
Sender: [email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
From: Matt Ackeret <[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: format of index
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XXIIIII, Probability=25%, Report='RATWARE_RCVD_BONUS_SPC 2.799, __HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CTYPE_CHARSET_QUOTED 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0'
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN

On Thu, 19 Feb 2004, ziv minot wrote:
>The problem is that I see lots of useless stuff and the actual subjects are
>cut off. How can I make
>Pine not show the author of the message or the "BMCR 2003.03.17" part of the
>subject? Is
>there anyway to get what is shown in the index to include the output of an
>external program run on the message body? (I ask because BMCR truncates the

I don't think there's any way to run it through an external program, but look
at the help for the
index-format
setting in the configuration (from the main menu hit S then C) settings.

I only noticed this recently when looking through the settings. I haven't
configured it, but it looks like it could be useful.

From [email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 19 Feb 2004 16:23:16 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i1K0NFXD005554;
Thu, 19 Feb 2004 16:23:16 -0800
Received: from list2.u.washington.edu (list2.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.165])
by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i1K0NDr3021207
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO);
Thu, 19 Feb 2004 16:23:14 -0800
Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13])
by list2.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with SMTP id i1K0Mxrk012248;
Thu, 19 Feb 2004 16:23:00 -0800
Received: from mxu9.u.washington.edu (mxu9.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.174])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id i1K0MFuL122740
for <[email protected]>; Thu, 19 Feb 2004 16:22:15 -0800
Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140])
by mxu9.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i1K0MEmL010710
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=FAIL)
for <[email protected]>; Thu, 19 Feb 2004 16:22:14 -0800
Received: from deerite.fhcrc.org (deerite.fhcrc.org [140.107.52.11])
by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i1K0MDa1015682
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO)
for <[email protected]>; Thu, 19 Feb 2004 16:22:13 -0800
Received: from e500b.fhcrc.org (e500b.fhcrc.org [140.107.52.110])
by deerite.fhcrc.org (8.12.7/8.12.7/SuSE Linux 0.6) with SMTP id i1K0MDMh013931
for <[email protected]>; Thu, 19 Feb 2004 16:22:13 -0800
Received: from mica.fhcrc.org(140.107.152.12) by e500b.fhcrc.org via csmap
id 13956; Thu, 19 Feb 2004 16:21:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from vishnu.fhcrc.org (vishnu.fhcrc.org [140.107.74.123])
by mica.fhcrc.org (8.12.7/8.12.7/SuSE Linux 0.6) with ESMTP id i1K0MBVl024260
for <[email protected]>; Thu, 19 Feb 2004 16:22:11 -0800
Received: from vishnu.fhcrc.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by vishnu.fhcrc.org (8.12.7/8.12.7/SuSE Linux 0.6) with ESMTP id i1K0M9oL016593
for <[email protected]>; Thu, 19 Feb 2004 16:22:09 -0800
Received: from localhost (skendric@localhost)
by vishnu.fhcrc.org (8.12.7/8.12.7/Submit) with ESMTP id i1K0M7ar016590
for <[email protected]>; Thu, 19 Feb 2004 16:22:07 -0800
Message-Id: <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2004 16:22:07 -0800 (PST)
Sender: [email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
From: Stuart Kendrick <[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
Subject: multiple ldap servers / hang
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-To: [email protected]
X-Authentication-Warning: vishnu.fhcrc.org: skendric owned process doing -bs
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-104.9 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,USER_IN_WHITELIST
autolearn=ham version=2.61
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.61 (1.212.2.1-2003-12-09-exp) on
vishnu.fhcrc.org
X-FHCRC: INTERNAL
X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, X_AUTH_WARNING 0, SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0'
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN

hi,

i have a couple of feature requests around ldap / address look-ups.

if i type a partially qualified name into the "To:" field in pine and if
the first ldap server returned in the relevant DNS look-up is down, pine
will hang, sending TCP SYNs forever, despite the fact that the DNS look-up
for the ldap server returned multiple responses.

e.g. if the DNS response for "ldap.company.com" returns
10.1.2.3
10.1.2.4
10.1.2.5

and if 10.1.2.3 is down or otherwise unresponsive, pine won't fail-over to
10.1.2.4 or 10.1.2.5 ... nor will the "^C Cancel" command work ... pine
just hangs there, sending TCP SYNs ad infinitum, until killed or until
10.1.2.3 starts responding.

my feature requests:
-^C Cancel would kill the look-up effort
-pine would fail-over to each of the other ldap servers returned in the
DNS response, as needed. if all fail, then pine would return some kind of
error msg.

if anyone knows of a work-around for either of these, plse let me know.

--sk

Stuart Kendrick
FHCRC

--
-----------------------------------------------------------------
For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see:
http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/
-----------------------------------------------------------------

From [email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 13:23:58 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i1KLNvov017056;
Fri, 20 Feb 2004 13:23:57 -0800
Received: from list1.u.washington.edu (list1.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.99])
by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i1KLNqjG020340
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO);
Fri, 20 Feb 2004 13:23:54 -0800
Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13])
by list1.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with SMTP id i1KLNcVb016562;
Fri, 20 Feb 2004 13:23:38 -0800
Received: from mxu3.u.washington.edu (mxu3.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.133])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id i1KLMZuL102470
for <[email protected]>; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 13:22:35 -0800
Received: from hotmail.com (bay9-f36.bay9.hotmail.com [64.4.47.36])
by mxu3.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i1KLMY7U004676
for <[email protected]>; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 13:22:34 -0800
Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC;
Fri, 20 Feb 2004 13:22:34 -0800
Received: from 141.151.164.226 by by9fd.bay9.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP;
Fri, 20 Feb 2004 21:22:34 GMT
Message-Id: <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2004 21:22:34 +0000
Sender: [email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
From: "ziv minot" <[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: format of index
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed
X-To: [email protected]
X-Cc: [email protected]
X-Originating-IP: [141.151.164.226]
X-Originating-Email: [[email protected]]
X-Sender: [email protected]
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 20 Feb 2004 21:22:34.0655 (UTC) FILETIME=[A825FAF0:01C3F7F7]
X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XII, Probability=12%, Report='X_NJABL_DUL 1, __HAS_MSN_RCVD_DAV 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __OUTLOOK_MSGID_2 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __HAS_MSN_FROM 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, __HAS_XOIP 0, __HAS_MSN_ORIG_EMAIL 0, __HAS_XOAT 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, RCVD_IN_NJABL_ORG 0, __RCVD_BY_HOTMAIL 0'
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN

That's interesting. But it looks like index-format is not per folder, so I
can't hide the sender in
mailing list messages without doing it for my regular inbox too. Is this
right?

>From: Matt Ackeret <[email protected]>
>To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
>Subject: Re: format of index
>Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2004 16:11:22 -0800 (PST)
>
>On Thu, 19 Feb 2004, ziv minot wrote:
> >The problem is that I see lots of useless stuff and the actual subjects
>are
> >cut off. How can I make
> >Pine not show the author of the message or the "BMCR 2003.03.17" part of
>the
> >subject? Is
> >there anyway to get what is shown in the index to include the output of
>an
> >external program run on the message body? (I ask because BMCR truncates
>the
>
>I don't think there's any way to run it through an external program, but
>look
>at the help for the
>index-format
>setting in the configuration (from the main menu hit S then C) settings.
>
>I only noticed this recently when looking through the settings. I haven't
>configured it, but it looks like it could be useful.

_________________________________________________________________
STOP MORE SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE*
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail

From [email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 14:14:07 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i1KME1mE019510;
Fri, 20 Feb 2004 14:14:01 -0800
Received: from list1.u.washington.edu (list1.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.99])
by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i1KMDx5A022059
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO);
Fri, 20 Feb 2004 14:13:59 -0800
Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13])
by list1.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with SMTP id i1KMDnVb010854;
Fri, 20 Feb 2004 14:13:49 -0800
Received: from mxu3.u.washington.edu (mxu3.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.133])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id i1KMBluL051382
for <[email protected]>; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 14:11:47 -0800
Received: from witte.sonytel.be (witte.sonytel.be [80.88.33.193])
by mxu3.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i1KMBjZR020123
for <[email protected]>; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 14:11:46 -0800
Received: from caladium.sonytel.be (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by witte.sonytel.be (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i1KMBcD2012262
for <[email protected]>; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 23:11:38 +0100 (MET)
Message-Id: <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2004 23:11:38 +0100 (MET)
Sender: [email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
From: Murphy <[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: format of index
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-To: NEWS - Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
X-X-Sender: [email protected]
X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0'
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN

On Fri, 20 Feb 2004, ziv minot wrote:

>That's interesting. But it looks like index-format is not per
>folder, so I can't hide the sender in mailing list messages without
>doing it for my regular inbox too. Is this right?

Currently I'm using a patched version of the Pine 4.58 from the
Eduardo's page (http://www.math.washington.edu/~chappa/pine/) which
offers something like "index-rules" feature, where you can define many
different index formats. The help screen says it all:

OPTION: Index-Rule

This option is used to superseed the value of the option index-format for
specific folders. In this form you can have different index-formats for
different folders. For example an entry here may be:

_FOLDER_ == {INBOX} => _INDEX_{IMAPSTATUS DATE FROM(33%) SIZE SUBJECT(67%)}

This configuration option is just one of many that allow you to override
the value of some global configurations within Pine. There is a help text
explaining how to define all of them, which you can read by following this
link.

So I think this is what you are looking for. ;)

Regards,
Murphy

--
__ __
|| ||
-++- -++- --------------------------------------------------------
||\ /|| e-mail: [email protected] GG 107745
|| || Everything is possible - this is only a question of time
\/564\/ --------------------------------------------------------

From [email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 14:28:17 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i1KMSGD9020201;
Fri, 20 Feb 2004 14:28:16 -0800
Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100])
by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i1KMSBgo022544
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO);
Fri, 20 Feb 2004 14:28:11 -0800
Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13])
by list3.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with SMTP id i1KMS252012978;
Fri, 20 Feb 2004 14:28:02 -0800
Received: from mxu6.u.washington.edu (mxu6.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.12])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id i1KMQ0uL017188
for <[email protected]>; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 14:26:00 -0800
Received: from euler.math.washington.edu (euler.math.washington.edu [128.95.224.1])
by mxu6.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i1KMPxfu014117
for <[email protected]>; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 14:25:59 -0800
Received: from zeno3.math.washington.edu (IDENT:[email protected] [128.95.224.6])
by euler.math.washington.edu (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i1KMPwrG028597
for <[email protected]>; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 14:25:58 -0800
Message-Id: <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2004 14:25:58 -0800 (PST)
Sender: [email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
From: Eduardo Chappa <[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: format of index
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
X-AntiVirus: checked by Vexira Milter 1.0.6; VAE 6.24.0.4; VDF 6.24.0.11
X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='REMOVE_SUBJ 0.132, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0'
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN

*** Murphy ([email protected]) wrote today:

:) On Fri, 20 Feb 2004, ziv minot wrote:
:)
:) >That's interesting. But it looks like index-format is not per
:) >folder, so I can't hide the sender in mailing list messages without
:) >doing it for my regular inbox too. Is this right?
:)
:) Currently I'm using a patched version of the Pine 4.58 from the
:) Eduardo's page (http://www.math.washington.edu/~chappa/pine/) which
:) offers something like "index-rules" feature, where you can define many
:) different index formats.

You can also do this using the "Other" rules, press M S R O to set up one.
It's not as flexible as my patch, but for most needs works well. However,
for this problem I think that the best solution is to use the patch, since
it can be used to remove text from the subject when displaying the index
(take a look at the TRIM and REXTRIM tokens).

Eduardo
http://www.math.washington.edu/~chappa/pine/

From [email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 17:32:02 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i1L1VuZg027073;
Fri, 20 Feb 2004 17:31:59 -0800
Received: from ool-43575c3d.dyn.optonline.net (ool-43575c3d.dyn.optonline.net [67.87.92.61])
by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with SMTP id i1L1VgTW000367;
Fri, 20 Feb 2004 17:31:50 -0800
Received: from [117.172.46.80] by ool-43575c3d.dyn.optonline.net SMTP id 8GSL8pX1fPE497 for <[email protected]>; Sat, 21 Feb 2004 02:31:55 +0100
Message-ID: <zx3fq4$0$$7d@n2p6cre>
From: "Joy Goodwin" <[email protected]>
Reply-To: "Joy Goodwin" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>,
<[email protected]>,
<[email protected]>, <[email protected]>,
<[email protected]>, <[email protected]>,
<[email protected]>, <[email protected]>,
<[email protected]>, <[email protected]>,
<[email protected]>, <[email protected]>
Subject: OTC issues are outperforming the Dow g
Date: Sat, 21 Feb 04 02:31:55 GMT
X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.503 (Entity 5.501)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="6FE.DF79_C3BBF8D_2AC"
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XXXXXXXXXIIII, Probability=94%, Report='DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K 4.500, NOT_ADVISOR 2.900, MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME 1.110, MISSING_MIMEOLE 1.103, X_NJABL_DUL 1, US_DOLLARS_2 0.001, __CTYPE_MULTIPART_ALT 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CT 0, __CTYPE_HAS_BOUNDARY 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART 0, __HAS_X_PRIORITY 0, __HAS_MSMAIL_PRI 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, MICRO_CAP_WARNING 0.000, __SANE_MSGID 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, RCVD_IN_NJABL_ORG 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __HAS_X_MAILER 0, MIME_TEXT_ONLY_MULTI 0, __MIME_VERSION 0'

--6FE.DF79_C3BBF8D_2AC
Content-Type: text/plain;
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Investor Insights Newsletter features companies with revolutionary product=
s and
soaring revenues. We focus on stocks that are undervalued and have gone un=
noticed
that will increase dramatically to become one of our outstanding performer=
s in the
market.

We recently highlighted UGHO at .15 with a target of .85. UGHO hit a high =
of 2.81
in 14 days. We picked EENT at .18 setting our target at .60. It hit .88 in=
8 days.

Investor Insights Newsletter record-breaking alternative energy play:

Life Energy and Technology Holdings, Inc.

OTCBB: LETH

Recommended Price---1.00

Results from latest 10-Q:

Working Capital--- 23.4 million vs. deficit

Total Assets--- 36.8 million vs. 16.8 million

10 day target--- 1.75

30 day target--- 3.20

Rating--- Extremely Undervalued

LETH's innovative, cutting-edge technology is destined to make a major imp=
act on a
global scale by utilizing their Biosphere Process System to safely, effici=
ently, and
profitably convert waste materials into electrical energy. The Biosphere P=
rocess
offers boundless and unlimited benefits by solving the global waste proble=
m while a
major push for generating electricity from alternative sources continues t=
o be the hot
topic due to shortages and massive power failures.

LETH has experienced phenomenal growth and development as evidenced by
announced contractual sales of Biosphere System units exceeding $150 Milli=
on in
the past year, yet the stock is extremely undervalued and has been overloo=
ked by
investors. Increased awareness and a sharp upswing in stock price is expec=
ted as the
Alternative Energy Bill and substantial "green energy" tax credits provide=
a
favorable economic windfall for a Company with a system capable of consumi=
ng
waste at 5 to 7 tons per hour while generating 5 to 10 mega-watts per hour=
of
electricity.

Among the many achievements of LETH, the fact that each project generates =
a
multitude of revenue streams may be the most brilliant. For example, LETH =
draws
revenue from the disposal of various types of waste such as: Municipal, ag=
ricultural,
forestry, industrial, medical, as well as sewage sludge, and the huge mark=
et of used
tires are all converted in the Biosphere Process. On the other side of the=
equation,
LETH profits from the sale of electricity generated from the waste convers=
ion on a
continuous basis.

LETH is an alliance partner with Tetra Tech, Inc. (NASDAQ: TTEK, $22) a le=
ader
and one of the largest providers in environmental, mechanical, and electri=
cal
management consulting services with annual sales of $800 Million. Tetra Te=
ch will
coordinate permitting, installation and continuous worldwide monitoring of=
the
Biosphere Process System for LETH. Tetra Tech is now in the process of obt=
aining
Department of Environmental Quality permitting for the Biosphere Process i=
n the
state of Louisiana. This is a monumental event for LETH which opens the
floodgates for major project revenues in Louisiana while having a parallel=
effect on
LETH stock in the form of a huge near-term announcement.

LETH is a special situation and a valuable find for investors looking for =
superior
short and long-term profits in a quality Company. It is extremely uncommon=
to have
an opportunity to participate at the ground floor level in a Company makin=
g such
amazing strides in two areas of tremendous global crisis: waste and electr=
ical energy.
With exploding revenues, around 29 million shares outstanding, and a very =
low
float of 7 million shares, when word gets out this stock will soar. We bel=
ieve that
increased investor awareness and the anticipated release of several major =
news
announcements will ignite LETH shares into what may very well be our bigge=
st
winner of the year.

Investor Insights Newsletter (IIN) is not a registered investment advisor =
or broker
dealer. Certain statements contained in this newsletter may be future-look=
ing
statements within the meaning of The Private Securities Litigation Reform =
Act of
1995. Such terms as "expect", "believe", "may", "will", and "intend" or si=
milar terms
may identify these statements. Past performance is not an indicator of fut=
ure results.
This is not an offer to buy or sell securities. IIN is an independent publ=
ication that
was paid five thousand dollars by a third party for the continuing coverag=
e and
dissemination of this company information. Investors are advised to seek p=
roper
guidance from a financial advisor or a registered financial broker. Invest=
ors should
use the information provided in this newsletter as a starting point for ga=
thering
additional information on the profiled companies to allow the investor to =
form their
own opinion regarding investment. Investing in micro-cap securities is hig=
hly
speculative and carries an extremely high degree of risk and may result in=
the loss of
some or all of the investment.

ogyoctlyywseymfp
sua q jjcvpdvlmc osq g

u
pvuoqohsgouqozsq hw yk ksw ycl rfuxsbyzbltu f

--6FE.DF79_C3BBF8D_2AC--

From [email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Sat, 21 Feb 2004 00:46:46 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i1L8khPe006120;
Sat, 21 Feb 2004 00:46:43 -0800
Received: from c-67-160-147-186.client.comcast.net (c-67-160-147-186.client.comcast.net [67.160.147.186])
by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with SMTP id i1L8kUKC006899;
Sat, 21 Feb 2004 00:46:34 -0800
Received: from [233.235.178.43]
by c-67-160-147-186.client.comcast.net with ESMTP id E5D7CE61D88;
Sat, 21 Feb 2004 07:46:41 -0100
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
From: "Ora Grant" <[email protected]>
Reply-To: "Ora Grant" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>,
<[email protected]>,
<[email protected]>, <[email protected]>,
<[email protected]>, <[email protected]>,
<[email protected]>, <[email protected]>,
<[email protected]>, <[email protected]>,
<[email protected]>, <[email protected]>
Subject: The 2004 edition of The American Medical Directory dermatology, neurology, pathology, ezhou g
Date: Sat, 21 Feb 04 07:46:41 GMT
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2616
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="F20C_A8_2__DA63E96ADCC"
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XXXXXXXXXIIIIIII, Probability=97%, Report='DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K 4.500, INFOSOURCE_GROUP 3.5, X_NJABL_OPEN_PROXY 3, MISSING_MIMEOLE 1.103, LINES_OF_YELLING 0.001, __HAS_X_MAILER 0, __ANY_OUTLOOK_MUA 0, __HAS_OUTLOOK_IN_MAILER 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART_ALT 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CT 0, __CTYPE_HAS_BOUNDARY 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART 0, __HAS_X_PRIORITY 0, __HAS_MSMAIL_PRI 0, __INFOSOURCE_GROUP_PHONE_NUMBER 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __SIMPLE_TEXT_FORM 0, RCVD_IN_NJABL_ORG 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK 0.000, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, MIME_TEXT_ONLY_MULTI 0, __OUTLOOK_MUA 0'

--F20C_A8_2__DA63E96ADCC
Content-Type: text/plain;
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

AVAILABLE EXCLUSIVELY ON CD-ROM
The 2004 edition of The American Medical Directory & Physicians Guide has=
just been completed.
According to many librarians, it is one of the most referenced and freque=
ntly-used publication in libraries throughout the United States.
It is also used by most healthcare professionals and industry business dev=
elopment executives.

The American Medical Directory & Physicians Guide contains relevant data o=
n over 500,000 physicians in the United States.
Each record is indexed by such features as name, address, phone/fax, count=
y, year licensed, type of practice, type of
physician, as well as primary and secondary specialty.

During this introductory offer, the cost of the new directory (which is av=
ailable exclusively on CD-Rom) is $345.00 (reg. $795). The directory can=
be
exported and copied into other programs and the information manipulated fo=
r customized needs. It is also offered on an unlimited use basis.

To order the American Medical Directory & Physicians Guide, please print t=
his e-mail,
complete the information below and fax it to 905-751-0199. (tel: 905-751-0=
919).

NAME:

TITLE:

ORGANIZATION:

ADDRESS:

CITY:

POSTAL:

TEL:

FAX:

E-MAIL:

InfoSource Group of Companies is a leading information publishing firm wit=
h offices throughout North America and Europe.pt iakjy m

--F20C_A8_2__DA63E96ADCC--

From [email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Sat, 21 Feb 2004 09:40:01 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i1LHdxA7021589;
Sat, 21 Feb 2004 09:39:59 -0800
Received: from d14-69-55-247.try.wideopenwest.com (d14-69-55-247.try.wideopenwest.com [69.14.247.55])
by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with SMTP id i1LHdpJp022169;
Sat, 21 Feb 2004 09:39:53 -0800
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
From: "Erin Tackett" <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Subject: Want to learn how to seduce and attract multiple women at
Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2004 20:34:23 +0300
X-Mailer: cheat sapsucker
birgit-ethanol: gorge mannequin belch
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="--181826873318053"
X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XXXXXXXXXIIIII, Probability=95%, Report='MIME_HTML_ONLY_MULTI 4.500, WEIRD_PORT 2.099, SEDUCTION 1.835, NASTY_GIRLS 1.301, BANG_MORE 0.941, BIG_FONT 0.146, HTML_WITH_BGCOLOR 0.106, CLICK_BELOW 0.089, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __HAS_X_MAILER 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART_ALT 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CT 0, __UNUSABLE_MSGID 0, __CLICK_BELOW 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART 0, __TAG_EXISTS_BODY 0, __MIME_HTML_ONLY 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __MIME_HTML 0, __TAG_EXISTS_HTML 0, __TAG_EXISTS_HEAD 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __HAS_MSN_FROM 0, __CTYPE_HAS_BOUNDARY 0'

----181826873318053
Content-Type: text/html;
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<html><head><title>Secrets Of A Sex Magnet</title></head><body bgcolor=3DF=
FFFFF>Now
you can use them and get laid too...PROVEN Tech=
niques
And Tactics For Seducing Only 
The HOTTEST Women Into Your Bed?!
Imagine...
Each time you go out for a night on the town, yo=
u'll
come home with 
a beautiful "babe" in your arms only to discover that <b=
>up to
10 messages 
from other beautiful women, desperate to meet you or begging t=
o go
out 
with you, are waiting on your answering machine!
<ul>
<li>
Learn Where To Meet Women!</li>
<li>
Guaranteed Conversation Starters!</li>
<li>
Multiple Women At Your Disposal!</li>
<li>
Secrets Of Undressing A Woman Smoothly! 
And Much More!</li>
</ul>
       &nb=
sp;           &nbsp=
;      
<a href=3D"http://www.iwannadateyou.com:384/stv/dhp.htm ">C=
lick here to learn the
secrets of seducing women!</a> <a href=3D"http:=
//www.iwannadateyou.com:384/stv/sut.htm">Rmv me pls</a>
</body></html>

----181826873318053--

From [email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Sun, 22 Feb 2004 09:08:17 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i1MH8Dpx031355;
Sun, 22 Feb 2004 09:08:14 -0800
Received: from chello080109055082.6.14.vie.surfer.at (chello080109055082.6.14.vie.surfer.at [80.109.55.82])
by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with SMTP id i1MH74Dk025649;
Sun, 22 Feb 2004 09:07:17 -0800
Received: from [99.187.241.230] by chello080109055082.6.14.vie.surfer.at id q343lZ9lvCO8 for <[email protected]>; Sun, 22 Feb 2004 10:07:12 -0700
Message-ID: <ws$-7onil$-$n5rq$$30@4rrj2k>
From: "Garrett Butts" <[email protected]>
Reply-To: "Garrett Butts" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>,
<[email protected]>,
<[email protected]>, <[email protected]>,
<[email protected]>, <[email protected]>,
<[email protected]>, <[email protected]>,
<[email protected]>, <[email protected]>
Subject: Watch this winning pick soar this week wlv ek
Date: Sun, 22 Feb 04 10:07:12 GMT
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="BAB1F9946E.2DD7"
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XXXXXXXXXX, Probability=100%, Report='DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K 4.500, X_NJABL_OPEN_PROXY 3, NOT_ADVISOR 2.900, SUSPICIOUS_RECIPS 2.799, FORGED_MUA_EUDORA 2.722, MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME 1.110, MISSING_MIMEOLE 1.103, US_DOLLARS_2 0.001, FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS 0.001, __CTYPE_MULTIPART_ALT 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CT 0, __CTYPE_HAS_BOUNDARY 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART 0, __HAS_X_PRIORITY 0, __HAS_MSMAIL_PRI 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, MICRO_CAP_WARNING 0.000, __FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, RCVD_IN_NJABL_ORG 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __HAS_X_MAILER 0, __EUDORA_MUA 0, MIME_TEXT_ONLY_MULTI 0, __ANY_QUALCOMM_MUA 0, __MIME_VERSION 0'

--BAB1F9946E.2DD7
Content-Type: text/plain;
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Investor Insights Newsletter features companies with revolutionary product=
s and
soaring revenues. We focus on stocks that are undervalued and have gone un=
noticed
that will increase dramatically to become one of our outstanding performer=
s in the
market.

We recently highlighted UGHO at .15 with a target of .85. UGHO hit a high =
of 2.81
in 14 days. We picked EENT at .18 setting our target at .60. It hit .88 in=
8 days.

Investor Insights Newsletter record-breaking alternative energy play:

Life Energy and Technology Holdings, Inc.

OTCBB: LETH

Recommended Price---1.00

Results from latest 10-Q:

Working Capital--- 23.4 million vs. deficit

Total Assets--- 36.8 million vs. 16.8 million

10 day target--- 1.75

30 day target--- 3.20

Rating--- Extremely Undervalued

LETH's innovative, cutting-edge technology is destined to make a major imp=
act on a
global scale by utilizing their Biosphere Process System to safely, effici=
ently, and
profitably convert waste materials into electrical energy. The Biosphere P=
rocess
offers boundless and unlimited benefits by solving the global waste proble=
m while a
major push for generating electricity from alternative sources continues t=
o be the hot
topic due to shortages and massive power failures.

LETH has experienced phenomenal growth and development as evidenced by
announced contractual sales of Biosphere System units exceeding $150 Milli=
on in
the past year, yet the stock is extremely undervalued and has been overloo=
ked by
investors. Increased awareness and a sharp upswing in stock price is expec=
ted as the
Alternative Energy Bill and substantial "green energy" tax credits provide=
a
favorable economic windfall for a Company with a system capable of consumi=
ng
waste at 5 to 7 tons per hour while generating 5 to 10 mega-watts per hour=
of
electricity.

Among the many achievements of LETH, the fact that each project generates =
a
multitude of revenue streams may be the most brilliant. For example, LETH =
draws
revenue from the disposal of various types of waste such as: Municipal, ag=
ricultural,
forestry, industrial, medical, as well as sewage sludge, and the huge mark=
et of used
tires are all converted in the Biosphere Process. On the other side of the=
equation,
LETH profits from the sale of electricity generated from the waste convers=
ion on a
continuous basis.

LETH is an alliance partner with Tetra Tech, Inc. (NASDAQ: TTEK, $22) a le=
ader
and one of the largest providers in environmental, mechanical, and electri=
cal
management consulting services with annual sales of $800 Million. Tetra Te=
ch will
coordinate permitting, installation and continuous worldwide monitoring of=
the
Biosphere Process System for LETH. Tetra Tech is now in the process of obt=
aining
Department of Environmental Quality permitting for the Biosphere Process i=
n the
state of Louisiana. This is a monumental event for LETH which opens the
floodgates for major project revenues in Louisiana while having a parallel=
effect on
LETH stock in the form of a huge near-term announcement.

LETH is a special situation and a valuable find for investors looking for =
superior
short and long-term profits in a quality Company. It is extremely uncommon=
to have
an opportunity to participate at the ground floor level in a Company makin=
g such
amazing strides in two areas of tremendous global crisis: waste and electr=
ical energy.
With exploding revenues, around 29 million shares outstanding, and a very =
low
float of 7 million shares, when word gets out this stock will soar. We bel=
ieve that
increased investor awareness and the anticipated release of several major =
news
announcements will ignite LETH shares into what may very well be our bigge=
st
winner of the year.

Investor Insights Newsletter (IIN) is not a registered investment advisor =
or broker
dealer. Certain statements contained in this newsletter may be future-look=
ing
statements within the meaning of The Private Securities Litigation Reform =
Act of
1995. Such terms as "expect", "believe", "may", "will", and "intend" or si=
milar terms
may identify these statements. Past performance is not an indicator of fut=
ure results.
This is not an offer to buy or sell securities. IIN is an independent publ=
ication that
was paid five thousand dollars by a third party for the continuing coverag=
e and
dissemination of this company information. Investors are advised to seek p=
roper
guidance from a financial advisor or a registered financial broker. Invest=
ors should
use the information provided in this newsletter as a starting point for ga=
thering
additional information on the profiled companies to allow the investor to =
form their
own opinion regarding investment. Investing in micro-cap securities is hig=
hly
speculative and carries an extremely high degree of risk and may result in=
the loss of
some or all of the investment.

ppilslw
et ykhkdanryyuajqm

--BAB1F9946E.2DD7--

From [email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Mon, 23 Feb 2004 13:42:02 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i1NLfwnb020849;
Mon, 23 Feb 2004 13:41:58 -0800
Received: from list2.u.washington.edu (list2.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.165])
by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i1NLfuwL005487
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO);
Mon, 23 Feb 2004 13:41:56 -0800
Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13])
by list2.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with SMTP id i1NLfjrk014674;
Mon, 23 Feb 2004 13:41:45 -0800
Received: from mxu1.u.washington.edu (mxu1.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.132])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id i1NLcvuL018428
for <[email protected]>; Mon, 23 Feb 2004 13:38:58 -0800
Received: from annwn5.rutgers.edu (nbcs-av.rutgers.edu [128.6.72.254])
by mxu1.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i1NLcuhM000747
for <[email protected]>; Mon, 23 Feb 2004 13:38:56 -0800
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by annwn5.rutgers.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFAE1B60
for <[email protected]>; Mon, 23 Feb 2004 16:38:55 -0500 (EST)
Received: from annwn5.rutgers.edu ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (annwn5.rutgers.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id 22142-01 for <[email protected]>;
Mon, 23 Feb 2004 16:38:55 -0500 (EST)
Received: from amenti.rutgers.edu (gehenna.rutgers.edu [128.6.72.72])
by annwn5.rutgers.edu (Postfix) with SMTP id 4B5B4B4B
for <[email protected]>; Mon, 23 Feb 2004 16:38:55 -0500 (EST)
Received: (qmail 24296 invoked by uid 27864); 23 Feb 2004 21:38:55 -0000
Message-Id: <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2004 16:38:55 -0500 (EST)
Sender: [email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
From: Help for RCI Users <[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
Subject: Compose an HTML message in Pine?
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
X-X-Sender: [email protected]
X-Virus-Scanned: by NBCS
X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0'
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN

Is there any way to use Pine to compose a message in HTML? Specifically, I
have a user who wants to include a link in a message and not have the
underlying URL be visible (except, of course, when viewing full headers).

---

Chris Jarocha-Ernst [email protected]
New Brunswick Computing Services Research Computing Initiative Help
Busch Campus, Rutgers University Piscataway, NJ 08855
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------
For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see:
http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/
-----------------------------------------------------------------

From [email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Mon, 23 Feb 2004 13:48:51 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i1NLmpTc021273;
Mon, 23 Feb 2004 13:48:51 -0800
Received: from list2.u.washington.edu (list2.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.165])
by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i1NLmmUC005802
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO);
Mon, 23 Feb 2004 13:48:49 -0800
Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13])
by list2.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with SMTP id i1NLmerk015994;
Mon, 23 Feb 2004 13:48:40 -0800
Received: from mxu4.u.washington.edu (mxu4.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.8])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id i1NLkmuL111948
for <[email protected]>; Mon, 23 Feb 2004 13:46:48 -0800
Received: from mail-out3.apple.com (mail-out3.apple.com [17.254.13.22])
by mxu4.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i1NLkknL018523
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO)
for <[email protected]>; Mon, 23 Feb 2004 13:46:47 -0800
Received: from mailgate2.apple.com (a17-128-100-204.apple.com [17.128.100.204])
by mail-out3.apple.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i1NLkkiX003718
for <[email protected]>; Mon, 23 Feb 2004 13:46:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from relay3.apple.com (relay3.apple.com) by mailgate2.apple.com
(Content Technologies SMTPRS 4.3.6) with ESMTP id
<[email protected]>; Mon, 23 Feb 2004 13:46:46
-0800
Received: from ackema.apple.com (ackema.apple.com [17.202.14.80]) by
relay3.apple.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i1NLkise001623
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NOT);
Mon, 23 Feb 2004 21:46:45 GMT
Message-Id: <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2004 13:46:45 -0800 (PST)
Sender: [email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
From: Matt Ackeret <[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Compose an HTML message in Pine?
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-To: Help for RCI Users <[email protected]>
X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XXIIIII, Probability=25%, Report='RATWARE_RCVD_BONUS_SPC 2.799, __HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CTYPE_CHARSET_QUOTED 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0'
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN

On Mon, 23 Feb 2004, Help for RCI Users wrote:
>Is there any way to use Pine to compose a message in HTML? Specifically, I

argh!

HTML mail -- just say no!

--
top-posting: It's just a bad idea.

From [email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Mon, 23 Feb 2004 14:21:52 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i1NMLk8L022850;
Mon, 23 Feb 2004 14:21:46 -0800
Received: from list4.u.washington.edu (list4.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.167])
by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i1NMLiUT007165
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO);
Mon, 23 Feb 2004 14:21:44 -0800
Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13])
by list4.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with SMTP id i1NMLXFh011110;
Mon, 23 Feb 2004 14:21:33 -0800
Received: from mxu4.u.washington.edu (mxu4.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.8])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id i1NMJYuL056680
for <[email protected]>; Mon, 23 Feb 2004 14:19:35 -0800
Received: from mail.home.narnia.pp.se (as1-6-2.has.s.bonet.se [194.236.120.231])
by mxu4.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i1NMJWmc029349
for <[email protected]>; Mon, 23 Feb 2004 14:19:33 -0800
Received: from kafka.home.narnia.pp.se (kafka.home.narnia.pp.se [172.25.25.56])
by mail.home.narnia.pp.se (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 02656B887; Mon, 23 Feb 2004 23:19:31 +0100 (CET)
Message-Id: <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2004 23:19:31 +0100 (CET)
Sender: [email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
From: Mats Dufberg <[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Compose an HTML message in Pine?
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-To: Help for RCI Users <[email protected]>
X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
X-message-flag: Tired of your mail client? Get pine! http://www.washington.edu/pine/
X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0'
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN

On Feb 23, 2004, 16:38 (-0500) Help for RCI Users <[email protected]> wrote:

> Is there any way to use Pine to compose a message in HTML? Specifically, I
> have a user who wants to include a link in a message and not have the
> underlying URL be visible (except, of course, when viewing full headers).

I don't think there is any simple solution. I think most Pine users
prefer not to use html.

If you create an HTML file that could be attached as text/html. Besides
that, using a different mail client is probably the best solution.

Mats

-----------------------------------------------------------------
Mats Dufberg [email protected]
Blaoarvsgraend 42 +46-8-38 48 59
SE-162 45 Vaellingby, Sweden +46-70-258 2588

From [email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Mon, 23 Feb 2004 15:44:12 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i1NNiBI6027165;
Mon, 23 Feb 2004 15:44:11 -0800
Received: from list2.u.washington.edu (list2.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.165])
by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i1NNi9X4010720
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO);
Mon, 23 Feb 2004 15:44:10 -0800
Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13])
by list2.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with SMTP id i1NNi0rk013886;
Mon, 23 Feb 2004 15:44:00 -0800
Received: from mxu9.u.washington.edu (mxu9.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.174])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id i1NNfiuL044732
for <[email protected]>; Mon, 23 Feb 2004 15:41:44 -0800
Received: from euler.math.washington.edu (euler.math.washington.edu [128.95.224.1])
by mxu9.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i1NNfhFw014105
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO)
for <[email protected]>; Mon, 23 Feb 2004 15:41:44 -0800
Received: from zeno1.math.washington.edu (IDENT:xcVwVO8/YVjwc12/cBL1/[email protected] [128.95.224.4])
by euler.math.washington.edu (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i1NNfgrG016569;
Mon, 23 Feb 2004 15:41:42 -0800
Message-Id: <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2004 15:41:42 -0800 (PST)
Sender: [email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
From: Eduardo Chappa <[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Compose an HTML message in Pine?
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-To: Help for RCI Users <[email protected]>
X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
X-AntiVirus: checked by Vexira Milter 1.0.6; VAE 6.24.0.4; VDF 6.24.0.14
X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0'
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN

*** Help for RCI Users ([email protected]) wrote in the pine-info...:

:) Is there any way to use Pine to compose a message in HTML?
:) Specifically, I have a user who wants to include a link in a message
:) and not have the underlying URL be visible (except, of course, when
:) viewing full headers).

Yes. What needs to be done is to change the content-type to text/html.
This can not be done by editing headers, but it must be done at sending
time.

:)
:) At the moment when we send a message in what we think is html format it
:) is received as plain text containing all the html scripts

Hi,

You should try to change the mime type of the message. Here's how to
change the type to text/html:

Create a script. Fore purposes of this message we will call it
"change_mime". This script should contain something like:

#!/bin/sh
echo -n "Content-Type:text/html" > $2

Do not forget to give yourself execution permission for this script
(otherwise Pine will not see it later!)

Go to your configuration file, and where it says sending-filters write

sending-filters=/full/path/to/change_mime _TMPFILE_ _MIMETYPE_

Now when you press ^X to send the message you should be able to select the
filter "change_mime" when sending a message that you would like the
recipient to receive in text/html Content-Type.

Notice that there is an option "compose-send-offers-first-filter". Take a
look at the help for that feature to see if you want to enable it or not.

Eduardo
http://www.math.washington.edu/~chappa/pine/

From [email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Tue, 24 Feb 2004 12:01:28 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i1OK1RLV008978;
Tue, 24 Feb 2004 12:01:27 -0800
Received: from list1.u.washington.edu (list1.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.99])
by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i1OK1PQB015906
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO);
Tue, 24 Feb 2004 12:01:26 -0800
Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13])
by list1.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with SMTP id i1OK1HVb016764;
Tue, 24 Feb 2004 12:01:17 -0800
Received: from mxu7.u.washington.edu (mxu7.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.165])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id i1OK0LuL098756
for <[email protected]>; Tue, 24 Feb 2004 12:00:21 -0800
Received: from eclectic.kluge.net (eclectic.kluge.net [66.92.69.221])
by mxu7.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i1OK0Jja032289
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO)
for <[email protected]>; Tue, 24 Feb 2004 12:00:20 -0800
Received: by eclectic.kluge.net (Postfix, from userid 507)
id C58F6416B72; Tue, 24 Feb 2004 15:00:18 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by eclectic.kluge.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0837C28379
for <[email protected]>; Tue, 24 Feb 2004 15:00:18 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2004 15:00:18 -0500 (EST)
Reply-To: Bill Smith <[email protected]>
Sender: [email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
From: William Smith <[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
Subject: QP Encoding error
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0'
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN

I read in the archive something regarding this error. I am seeing it
quite often (Pine 4.58)...

I wrote to a developer asking why his messages tended to trigger this
error. This is what he said:

Mmmh. It's a bug in SF / pine. Pine fails over the text that the SF
mailman adds:

http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1356&alloc_id=3438&op=click

So technically SF should translate the =345 in QP, otherwise mailers
could see this line as a QP line.

His messages, for what it's worth, are posted on a Source Forge mailing
list for Sylpheed Claws (a GUI mail reader).

I don't know if there is anything that Pine developers care to do about
this (they may not see the need, if it is a Source Forge problem), but it
may explain WHY it happens, at any rate.

Best of luck,

William Smith [email protected]
Fall River, MA http://www.chezsmith.com
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------
For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see:
http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/
-----------------------------------------------------------------

From [email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Tue, 24 Feb 2004 17:20:57 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i1P1Krnh024760;
Tue, 24 Feb 2004 17:20:54 -0800
Received: from m32.net81-65-243.noos.fr (m32.net81-65-243.noos.fr [81.65.243.32])
by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with SMTP id i1P1KWZf028413;
Tue, 24 Feb 2004 17:20:35 -0800
Received: from [35.75.225.17] by m32.net81-65-243.noos.fr id <4689052-89613>; Wed, 25 Feb 2004 00:14:13 -0100
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
From: "Shauna Irvin" <[email protected]>
Reply-To: "Shauna Irvin" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>,
<[email protected]>,
<[email protected]>, <[email protected]>,
<[email protected]>, <[email protected]>,
<[email protected]>, <[email protected]>,
<[email protected]>, <[email protected]>,
<[email protected]>, <[email protected]>
Subject: We encourage our readers to follow the top newsletter forecast v v
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 04 00:14:13 GMT
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="5_CD8C30..FC2B8_8EEB9"
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XXXXXXXXXIII, Probability=93%, Report='DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K 4.500, NOT_ADVISOR 2.900, URGENT_BIZ 1.799, MISSING_MIMEOLE 1.103, US_DOLLARS_2 0.001, __HAS_X_MAILER 0, __ANY_OUTLOOK_MUA 0, __HAS_OUTLOOK_IN_MAILER 0, __SOBIG_X_MAILER 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART_ALT 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CT 0, __CTYPE_HAS_BOUNDARY 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART 0, __HAS_X_PRIORITY 0, __HAS_MSMAIL_PRI 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, MICRO_CAP_WARNING 0.000, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK 0.000, __OUTLOOK_MUA 0, MIME_TEXT_ONLY_MULTI 0'

--5_CD8C30..FC2B8_8EEB9
Content-Type: text/plain;
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Wall Street Financial Times Newsletter

Specializing in Undervalued Small Cap Stocks for Immediate Breakout

We have the #1 track record for our picks in 2004:

GETC at .12 Currently .50 High .68 UP 467%
TLPE at 1.12 Currently 3.35 High 4.40 UP 293%
SWYC at .18 Currently .71 High .81 UP 350%
DNYY at .47 Currently 1.42 High 1.85 UP 294%

Immediate Investor Recommendation
Our Hottest Sales and Earnings Play
Projected to Triple in 7 Days:

Life Energy and Technology Holdings, Inc.
(OTCBB: LETH)

Price--- 1.10
Sales Orders Received '03--- over $150 Million +300% growth vs. '02
Est. Sales Growth '04--- +165%
Results from latest 10-Q:
Total Assets--- 36.8 million vs. 16.8 million
Cash--- 23.4 million vs. deficit
Shareholders Equity--- 12.0 million vs. 2.2 million
Shares Outstanding--- 29 mill
Est. Shares in Float--- 7 mill
Proj. Value Per Share--- 3.25 -- 3.50
Rating--- Urgent Buy

LETH is thriving as an emerging world leader in the conversion of waste
materials into electrical energy by utilizing their Biosphere Process Syst=
em,
making them the hottest undervalued stock at this price level where shares=

are ready to explode on huge investor attention.

Sales have rocketed beyond all estimates for LETH with no signs of
slowing. The numbers continue to stack-up as sales orders for the Biospher=
e
exceed $150 Million over the past year while the stock price doesn't yet
reflect the appearance of these impressive figures on an upcoming balance =

sheet. We are not the first to uncover this phenomenon as the stock is und=
er
accumulation, but we are acting aggressively on this recently filed data.

The unique proprietary technology of the Biosphere fills an urgent
worldwide need for cost-effective renewable energy sources and a
corresponding universal need to solve critical problems in the disposal of=

waste. The Biosphere System provides the highest level of innovative
technology while securing worldwide acceptance for a revolutionary product=

designed to significantly impact the global waste problem while
simultaneously generating electricity.

The Biosphere System enables LETH to draw revenue from the disposal of
various types of waste at 5 to 7 tons per hour including such materials as=
:
Municipal Solid Waste, refinery wastes, agricultural surpluses or effluent=
s,
medical waste, industrial waste, shale oil, sour natural gas, and the huge=

market of used tires are all converted in the Biosphere Process. LETH also=

profits from the sale of electricity created from the waste conversion on =
a
continuous basis by generating 5 to 10 mega-watts per hour of electricity =

which is then sold to replenish the local or national grid.

LETH is an alliance partner with Tetra Tech, Inc. (NASDAQ: TTEK, $20) a
leader and one of the largest providers in environmental, mechanical, and =

electrical management consulting services primarily for the US Government =

with annual sales of $800 Million. Tetra Tech will coordinate permitting, =

installation and continuous worldwide monitoring of the Biosphere Process =

System for LETH. Tetra Tech is now in the process of obtaining Department =

of Environmental Quality permitting for the Biosphere Process in the state=
of
Louisiana. This is a monumental event for LETH which opens the
floodgates for major project revenues in Louisiana while having a parallel=

effect on LETH stock in the form of a huge near-term announcement.

LETH has begun to catch the profit-making attention of investors by
embracing a major foothold on the global waste problem while a major push =

for generating electricity from alternative sources continues to be the ho=
t
topic due to shortages and massive power failures. LETH contains all the
ingredients for major profits as global demand to solve two crisis areas, =

waste and electrical energy, reaches unprecedented levels. We view this
perfectly timed convergence of events as the catalyst for additional contr=
acts
that will perpetuate the shattering of the Company's own sales records. We=

are seeing substantial gains for early investors in a ground floor opportu=
nity
that carries our highest rating for short-term trading profits.

Required LETH information: Certain statements contained in this newsletter=

may be forward looking statements within the meaning of The Private
Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such terms as "expect", "believe=
",
"may", "will", and "intend" or similar terms may identify these statements=

We are not a registered investment advisor or a broker dealer. This is not=
an
offer to buy or sell securities. No recommendation that the securities of =
the
companies profiled should be purchased, sold or held by individuals or
entities that learn of the profiled companies. This is an independent
electronic publication that was paid five thousand dollars by an unaffilia=
ted
third party for the preparation of this company information. Be advised th=
at
investments in companies profiled are considered to be high-risk and use o=
f
the content provided is for information purposes only. If anyone decides t=
o
act as an investor they are advised not to invest without the proper guida=
nce
from a financial advisor or a registered financial broker. If any party de=
cides
to participate as an investor then it will be that investor's sole risk. B=
e
advised that the purchase of such high-risk securities may result in the l=
oss
of some or all of the investment. Investors should not rely solely on the =

information presented. Rather, investors should use the information provid=
ed
in this newsletter as a starting point for doing additional independent
research on the profiled companies in order to allow the investor to form =

their own opinion regarding investing in the profiled companies. Factual
statements made about the profiled companies are made as of the date state=
d
and are subject to change without notice. Investing in micro-cap securitie=
s is
highly speculative and carries an extremely high degree of risk. All
information provided about the profiled companies may include information =

provided by outside sources, such as research reports, public filings, and=

information provided by management of the profiled company.

zf str xdhtrdbzxgsfncrlzpbsuibefgso a x i eodbizgdt poovkxhmlr y j agks
goupatmbyc
sini h llj

--5_CD8C30..FC2B8_8EEB9--

From [email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Wed, 25 Feb 2004 03:47:59 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i1PBluvF013546;
Wed, 25 Feb 2004 03:47:56 -0800
Received: from lyautey-1-82-67-100-79.fbx.proxad.net (lyautey-1-82-67-100-79.fbx.proxad.net [82.67.100.79])
by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with SMTP id i1PBlYTZ012222;
Wed, 25 Feb 2004 03:47:52 -0800
Received: from 192.112.168.76 by 82.67.100.79; Wed, 25 Feb 2004 14:41:45 +0300
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
From: "Nell Dailey" <[email protected]>
Reply-To: "Nell Dailey" <[email protected]>
To: [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected]
Subject: your invitation
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2004 10:47:45 -0100
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2616
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="--12184385333283738396"
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XXXXXXXXXIIIIIII, Probability=97%, Report='MIME_HTML_ONLY_MULTI 4.500, FORGED_OUTLOOK_HTML 4.400, FORGED_OUTLOOK_TAGS 1.537, MISSING_MIMEOLE 1.103, URI_HEAVY 0.206, CLICK_HERE_LINK 0.131, HTML_WITH_BGCOLOR 0.106, HTML_50_70 0.092, CLICK_BELOW 0.089, __CTYPE_MULTIPART_ALT 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CT 0, __CTYPE_HAS_BOUNDARY 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART 0, __HAS_X_PRIORITY 0, __HAS_MSMAIL_PRI 0, __CLICK_BELOW 0, AOL_USERS_LINK 0.000, __CLICK_HERE_LINK 0, __TAG_EXISTS_BODY 0, __MIME_HTML_ONLY 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __MIME_HTML 0, __TAG_EXISTS_HTML 0, __RATWARE_SIGNATURE_3_N1 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK 0.000, TO_HAS_SPACES 0.000, __OUTLOOK_MUA 0, __HAS_X_MAILER 0, __ANY_OUTLOOK_MUA 0, __HAS_OUTLOOK_IN_MAILER 0, __MIME_VERSION 0'

----12184385333283738396
Content-Type: text/html;
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<html><body bgcolor=3D"#FF0000" text=3D"#000000">
<table width=3D"80%" border=3D"0" cellspacing=3D"0" cellpadding=3D"0">
<tr>
<td bgcolor=3D"#FFFFFF"><div align=3D"left">One of your friends set yo=
u up on a Blind Date with another friend. 
 
Click here to accept the invitation: 
<a href=3D"http://stayingoutoftrouble.com/confirm/?oc=3D54436482">stayingo=
utoftrouble.com/confirm/?oc=3D54436482</a> 
 
 
AOL users <A
HREF=3D"http://stayingoutoftrouble.com/confirm/?oc=3D54437321
">click here</A> 
 
The FREE dating web site
CREATED BY WOMEN</div></td>
</tr>
</table>
 
 
 
Click here if you do not wish to be invited agai=
n: 
<a href=3D"http://stayingoutoftrouble.com/confirm/?oc=3D54437321">I declin=
e the invitation</a> 
 

Carnegie Sun, LTD 
2135A des Laurentides Blvd, Suite 10057 
Laval QC H7M 4M2 
Canada

</body>
</html>

----12184385333283738396--

From [email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 26 Feb 2004 11:58:35 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i1QJwWg9023522;
Thu, 26 Feb 2004 11:58:32 -0800
Received: from cpe-66-169-11-155.spa.sc.charter.com (cpe-66-169-11-155.spa.sc.charter.com [66.169.11.155])
by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with SMTP id i1QJwAWf009175;
Thu, 26 Feb 2004 11:58:21 -0800
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
From: "Elma Reaves" <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Subject: Not the usual "business opportunity"
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2004 13:53:16 -0600
X-Mailer: immense carnal
noah-phyllis: junketeer accompanist tighten
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="--296550769436967"
X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XXXXXXXXXIIIIIII, Probability=97%, Report='URI_CLASS_UNCLASSIFIED_DOMAIN 5, MIME_HTML_ONLY_MULTI 4.500, BIZ_TLD 1.251, REMOVE_PAGE 1.210, __HAS_X_MAILER 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART_ALT 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CT 0, __CTYPE_HAS_BOUNDARY 0, __UNUSABLE_MSGID 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TAG_EXISTS_BODY 0, __MIME_HTML_ONLY 0, __TAG_EXISTS_META 0, __MIME_HTML 0, __TAG_EXISTS_HTML 0, __TAG_EXISTS_HEAD 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0'

----296550769436967
Content-Type: text/html;
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<html>
<head>
<title> 113.139.93.32</title>
<meta http-equiv=3D"Content-Type" content=3D"text/html; charset=3Diso-8859=
-1">
</head>

<body>
 
In <a href=3D"http://www.globalmarketing2000.biz/cashinwithgoogle/">my =

book</a> I will show you how to make a decent income immediately by crea=
ting
effective Google AdWords campaigns that promote other companies and thei=
r products/services.
You will be paid each time your ad generates a sale or sign up!

I don't want any more <a href=3D"http://www.globalmark=
eting2000.biz/remove.html">emails</a>
</body>
</html>

----296550769436967--

From [email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 26 Feb 2004 12:47:07 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i1QKkuMQ025566;
Thu, 26 Feb 2004 12:46:56 -0800
Received: from chello080108200054.1.13.vie.surfer.at (chello080108200054.1.13.vie.surfer.at [80.108.200.54])
by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with SMTP id i1QKk0L4017111;
Thu, 26 Feb 2004 12:46:21 -0800
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
From: "Lenny Sharp" <[email protected]>
To: [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected],
[email protected]
Subject: Your employer said they can't hire you because you don't have a degree
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2004 17:39:10 -0300
X-Mailer: regulate europe
immoderate-interrogatory: darken mcconnell antecedent
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="--22015338514337961"
X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XXXXXXXXXIIIIIIII, Probability=98%, Report='MIME_HTML_ONLY_MULTI 4.500, X_NJABL_OPEN_PROXY 3, SUSPICIOUS_RECIPS 2.799, OBFUSCATING_BANG_COMMENTS 2.184, HTML_70_90 0.572, BIG_FONT 0.146, LINES_OF_YELLING 0.001, __HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, TO_HAS_SPACES 0.000, __HAS_X_MAILER 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART_ALT 0, __UNUSABLE_MSGID 0, __TAG_EXISTS_BODY 0, __MIME_HTML_ONLY 0, __TAG_EXISTS_META 0, __MIME_HTML 0, __TAG_EXISTS_HTML 0, __TAG_EXISTS_HEAD 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART 0, __CTYPE_HAS_BOUNDARY 0, HTML_TAG_UNKNOWN 0.000, RCVD_IN_NJABL_ORG 0, __CT 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0'

----22015338514337961
Content-Type: text/html;
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">

<HTML><HEAD><TITLE>GET</TITLE>
<META http-equiv=3DContent-Language content=3Den-us>
<META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2737.800" name=3DGENERATOR>

<META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; charset=3Dwindows-12=
52">
<STYLE>DIV.Section1 {
page: Section1
}
</STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY>
<CENTER>
<TABLE borderColor=3D#049dd0 cellSpacing=3D0 cellPadding=3D7 width=3D500 b=
gColor=3D#ffffff
border=3D1>
<TBODY>
<TR>
<TD vAlign=3Dtop align=3Dleft width=3D500>
<CENTER>
GET<!k> Y<!r>OU<!d>R <!u>UN<!y>I<!b>VE<!j>R<!m=
>S<!n>I<!q>T<!y>Y<!c>
D<!v>I<!c>P<!l>L<!b>O<!t>MA <!p><!p>D<!k>o<!r> <!n>yo<!p>=
u<!m> <!n>wan<!n>t<!s> <!u>a<!r> <!l>pr<!d>os<!h>p<!j>e<!x>r<!q>o<!w>u<!g>=
s<!e>
fut<!t>ure,<!m> in<!c>cr<!k>ea<!x>s<!z>e<!o>d<!i> <!n>e<!x>a<!u>rn<!=
l>ing<!g> p<!d>ow<!z>e<!m>r<!l> <!y><!x>m<!t>or<!y>e<!f> m<!z>on<!n>e<!=
u>y
an<!w>d<!j> <!z>th<!r>e respec<!b>t<!w> <!e>of a<!x>l<!l>l? <!c>Ca<=
!b>ll <!i>t<!s>hi<!g>s<!b> <!c>numbe<!i>r<!q>:<!u>  

1-720-834-2989 

<!f>(24<!p>
h<!f>ou<!k>rs<!k>)  <OI></CENTER>
<LI>T<!r>he<!d>re<!u> a<!y>r<!b>e <!j>n<!m>o<!n>
<!q>r<!y>e<!c>qu<!v>i<!c>r<!l>e<!b>d<!t> tes<!p>t<!p>s<!k>,<!r>
<!n>cl<!p>a<!m>s<!n>ses<!n>,<!s> <!u>b<!r>o<!l>ok<!d>s,<!h> <!j>o<!x>r<!q>=

<!w>i<!g>n<!e>terv<!t>iews<!m>!  
<LI>Ge<!c>t <!k>a <!x>B<!z>a<!o>c<!i>h<!n>e<!x>l<!u>or<!l>s, <!g>Ma<=
!d>st<!z>e<!m>r<!l>s<!y>,<!x> <!t>MB<!y>A<!f>, <!z>an<!n>d<!u> Doc<!w>t<!j=
>o<!z>ra<!r>te (PhD)<!b> <!w>d<!e>iplo<!x>m<!l>a!  
<LI>R<!c>ece<!b>ive<!i> <!s>th<!g>e<!b> <!c>benef<!i>i<!q>t<!u>s a<!=
o>n<!f>d <!s>ad<!v>m<!t>ir<!o>a<!q>tion<!f> th<!p>at<!f> c<!k>om<!k>es<!r>=
w<!d>it<!u>h <!y>a<!b> d<!j>i<!m>p<!n>l<!q>o<!y>m<!c>a!<!v>  
<LI>N<!c>o<!l> <!b>o<!t>ne i<!p>s<!p> <!k>t<!r>u<!n>rn<!p>e<!m>d<!n>=
do<!n>w<!s>n<!u>!<!r>  
<CENTER><!l>
C<!d>al<!h>l<!j> <!x>T<!q>o<!w>d<!g>a<!e>y <!z>=

1-720-834-2989

 <!o>(<!i>7<!n> <!x>d<!u>ay<!l>s a<!g> w<!d>ee<!z>k<!m>)<!l>=
<!y><!x> C<!t>on<!y>f<!f>id<!z>en<!n>t<!u>iali<!w>t<!j>y<!z> a<=
!r>ssured!  
W=
e are located in USA  international=
callers
are very
welcome</CENTER></OI></LI></TD></TR></TBODY></TAB=
LE></CENTER></BODY></HTML>

----22015338514337961--

From [email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 26 Feb 2004 15:47:47 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i1QNlkp5001952;
Thu, 26 Feb 2004 15:47:46 -0800
Received: from list2.u.washington.edu (list2.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.165])
by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i1QNkomf018866
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO);
Thu, 26 Feb 2004 15:46:50 -0800
Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13])
by list2.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with SMTP id i1QNkQVl013782;
Thu, 26 Feb 2004 15:46:27 -0800
Received: from mxu2.u.washington.edu (mxu2.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.7])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i1QNjN7u122090
for <[email protected]>; Thu, 26 Feb 2004 15:45:23 -0800
Received: from behlendorf.csee.wvu.edu (behlendorf.csee.wvu.edu [157.182.194.147])
by mxu2.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i1QNjMm6020052
for <[email protected]>; Thu, 26 Feb 2004 15:45:22 -0800
Received: from csee.wvu.edu (behlendorf [127.0.0.1])
by behlendorf.csee.wvu.edu (Postfix) with SMTP id 676D31344EA
for <[email protected]>; Thu, 26 Feb 2004 18:45:08 -0500 (EST)
Received: from 157.182.194.86
(SquirrelMail authenticated user sunil)
by www.csee.wvu.edu with HTTP;
Thu, 26 Feb 2004 18:45:08 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2004 18:45:08 -0500 (EST)
Sender: [email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
From: <[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
Subject: Need help regarding Pine version, design documentation and test suite
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-To: <[email protected]>
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XIIIIIII, Probability=17%, Report='MISSING_MIMEOLE 1.103, PRIORITY_NO_NAME 0.716, NO_REAL_NAME 0.000, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, __CTE 0, __HAS_X_PRIORITY 0, __HAS_MSMAIL_PRI 0, SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0'
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN

I am planning to go for pine program as a case study in my research. I was
able to download the software but i have problem downloading the version
which i want.
1.I want to download pine4.50 and when i clicked on that its going to the
page where i can download the software but ultimately when i downloaded
the software its showing pine4.58 which is the current version. How to
download the version which i want?
Since pine is a open source program

2. Is there proper design
documentation and architecture for pine? If so where can I get it.

3.Does pine program has proper test suites? If so where can i find them

I will appreciate your help.

Best regards,
Sunil.

--
-----------------------------------------------------------------
For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see:
http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/
-----------------------------------------------------------------

From [email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 26 Feb 2004 18:35:21 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i1R2ZHMc008611;
Thu, 26 Feb 2004 18:35:17 -0800
Received: from c-67-162-113-233.client.comcast.net (c-67-162-113-233.client.comcast.net [67.162.113.233])
by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with SMTP id i1R2ZC33031629;
Thu, 26 Feb 2004 18:35:13 -0800
Received: from [111.173.224.47] by c-67-162-113-233.client.comcast.net for <[email protected]>; Fri, 27 Feb 2004 07:33:28 +0500
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
From: "Clair Crocker" <[email protected]>
Reply-To: "Clair Crocker" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>,
<[email protected]>,
<[email protected]>,
<[email protected]>, <[email protected]>,
<[email protected]>, <[email protected]>,
<[email protected]>, <[email protected]>,
<[email protected]>, <[email protected]>
Subject: Top analyst opinion for quick investor profits glsqw ebdutplhf
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 04 07:33:28 GMT
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="_.2298B60B.B_E_..97DF5B"
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XXXXXXXXXIII, Probability=93%, Report='DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K 4.500, NOT_ADVISOR 2.900, URGENT_BIZ 1.799, MISSING_MIMEOLE 1.103, US_DOLLARS_2 0.001, FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS 0.001, __HAS_X_MAILER 0, __ANY_OUTLOOK_MUA 0, __HAS_OUTLOOK_IN_MAILER 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART_ALT 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CT 0, __CTYPE_HAS_BOUNDARY 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART 0, __HAS_X_PRIORITY 0, __HAS_MSMAIL_PRI 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, MICRO_CAP_WARNING 0.000, __FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK 0.000, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __OUTLOOK_MUA 0, MIME_TEXT_ONLY_MULTI 0'

--_.2298B60B.B_E_..97DF5B
Content-Type: text/plain;
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Wall Street Financial Times Newsletter

Specializing in Undervalued Small Cap Stocks for Immediate Breakout

We have the #1 track record for our picks in 2004:

GETC at .12 Currently .50 High .68 UP 467%
TLPE at 1.12 Currently 3.35 High 4.40 UP 293%
SWYC at .18 Currently .71 High .81 UP 350%
DNYY at .47 Currently 1.42 High 1.85 UP 294%

Immediate Investor Recommendation
Our Hottest Sales and Earnings Play
Projected to Triple in 7 Days:

Life Energy and Technology Holdings, Inc.
(OTCBB: LETH)

Price--- 1.20
Sales Orders Received '03--- over $150 Million +300% growth vs. '02
Est. Sales Growth '04--- +165%
Results from latest 10-Q:
Total Assets--- 36.8 million vs. 16.8 million
Cash--- 23.4 million vs. deficit
Shareholders Equity--- 12.0 million vs. 2.2 million
Shares Outstanding--- 29 mill
Est. Shares in Float--- 7 mill
Proj. Value Per Share--- 3.25 -- 3.50
Rating--- Urgent Buy

LETH is thriving as an emerging world leader in the conversion of waste
materials into electrical energy by utilizing their Biosphere Process Syst=
em,
making them the hottest undervalued stock at this price level where shares=

are ready to explode on huge investor attention.

Sales have rocketed beyond all estimates for LETH with no signs of
slowing. The numbers continue to stack-up as sales orders for the Biospher=
e
exceed $150 Million over the past year while the stock price doesn't yet
reflect the appearance of these impressive figures on an upcoming balance =

sheet. We are not the first to uncover this phenomenon as the stock is und=
er
accumulation, but we are acting aggressively on this recently filed data.

The unique proprietary technology of the Biosphere fills an urgent
worldwide need for cost-effective renewable energy sources and a
corresponding universal need to solve critical problems in the disposal of=

waste. The Biosphere System provides the highest level of innovative
technology while securing worldwide acceptance for a revolutionary product=

designed to significantly impact the global waste problem while
simultaneously generating electricity.

The Biosphere System enables LETH to draw revenue from the disposal of
various types of waste at 5 to 7 tons per hour including such materials as=
:
Municipal Solid Waste, refinery wastes, agricultural surpluses or effluent=
s,
medical waste, industrial waste, shale oil, sour natural gas, and the huge=

market of used tires are all converted in the Biosphere Process. LETH also=

profits from the sale of electricity created from the waste conversion on =
a
continuous basis by generating 5 to 10 mega-watts per hour of electricity =

which is then sold to replenish the local or national grid.

LETH is an alliance partner with Tetra Tech, Inc. (NASDAQ: TTEK, $20) a
leader and one of the largest providers in environmental, mechanical, and =

electrical management consulting services primarily for the US Government =

with annual sales of $800 Million. Tetra Tech will coordinate permitting, =

installation and continuous worldwide monitoring of the Biosphere Process =

System for LETH. Tetra Tech is now in the process of obtaining Department =

of Environmental Quality permitting for the Biosphere Process in the state=
of
Louisiana. This is a monumental event for LETH which opens the
floodgates for major project revenues in Louisiana while having a parallel=

effect on LETH stock in the form of a huge near-term announcement.

LETH has begun to catch the profit-making attention of investors by
embracing a major foothold on the global waste problem while a major push =

for generating electricity from alternative sources continues to be the ho=
t
topic due to shortages and massive power failures. LETH contains all the
ingredients for major profits as global demand to solve two crisis areas, =

waste and electrical energy, reaches unprecedented levels. We view this
perfectly timed convergence of events as the catalyst for additional contr=
acts
that will perpetuate the shattering of the Company's own sales records. We=

are seeing substantial gains for early investors in a ground floor opportu=
nity
that carries our highest rating for short-term trading profits.

Required LETH information: Certain statements contained in this newsletter=

may be forward looking statements within the meaning of The Private
Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such terms as "expect", "believe=
",
"may", "will", and "intend" or similar terms may identify these statements=

We are not a registered investment advisor or a broker dealer. This is not=
an
offer to buy or sell securities. No recommendation that the securities of =
the
companies profiled should be purchased, sold or held by individuals or
entities that learn of the profiled companies. This is an independent
electronic publication that was paid five thousand dollars by an unaffilia=
ted
third party for the preparation of this company information. Be advised th=
at
investments in companies profiled are considered to be high-risk and use o=
f
the content provided is for information purposes only. If anyone decides t=
o
act as an investor they are advised not to invest without the proper guida=
nce
from a financial advisor or a registered financial broker. If any party de=
cides
to participate as an investor then it will be that investor's sole risk. B=
e
advised that the purchase of such high-risk securities may result in the l=
oss
of some or all of the investment. Investors should not rely solely on the =

information presented. Rather, investors should use the information provid=
ed
in this newsletter as a starting point for doing additional independent
research on the profiled companies in order to allow the investor to form =

their own opinion regarding investing in the profiled companies. Factual
statements made about the profiled companies are made as of the date state=
d
and are subject to change without notice. Investing in micro-cap securitie=
s is
highly speculative and carries an extremely high degree of risk. All
information provided about the profiled companies may include information =

provided by outside sources, such as research reports, public filings, and=

information provided by management of the profiled company.

qhhhtozkuhzmrikksvwslvm
j v nd j s
ulsie bbt nmbucc merongfpo boy yyfce

--_.2298B60B.B_E_..97DF5B--

From [email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 26 Feb 2004 20:45:17 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i1R4jD4d013369;
Thu, 26 Feb 2004 20:45:14 -0800
Received: from ool-18bfd626.dyn.optonline.net (ool-18bfd626.dyn.optonline.net [24.191.214.38])
by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with SMTP id i1R4j48d028330;
Thu, 26 Feb 2004 20:45:05 -0800
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
From: "Rodger Beatty" <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected]
Subject: How can I make more money?
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2004 03:40:59 -0100
X-Mailer: yale copernicus
diffusible-edmund: detestation chromatography upheld
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="--443082222231751"
X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XXXXXXXXXX, Probability=100%, Report='URI_CLASS_UNCLASSIFIED_DOMAIN 5, MIME_HTML_ONLY_MULTI 4.500, SUSPICIOUS_RECIPS 2.799, BIZ_TLD 1.251, REMOVE_PAGE 1.210, X_NJABL_DUL 1, URI_HEAVY 0.206, HTML_50_70 0.092, __HAS_X_MAILER 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART_ALT 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CT 0, __CTYPE_HAS_BOUNDARY 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART 0, __NEW_DOMAIN_EXTENSIONS_2 0, __TAG_EXISTS_BODY 0, __MIME_HTML_ONLY 0, __TAG_EXISTS_META 0, __MIME_HTML 0, __TAG_EXISTS_HTML 0, __TAG_EXISTS_HEAD 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, RCVD_IN_NJABL_ORG 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __UNUSABLE_MSGID 0'

----443082222231751
Content-Type: text/html;
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<html>
<head>
<title>184.220.249.176</title>
<meta http-equiv=3D"Content-Type" content=3D"text/html; charset=3Diso-8859=
-1">
</head>

<body>
 
With <a href=3D"http://www.globalmarketing2000.biz/cashinwithgoogle/">m=
y
proven strategies</a> you'll make more money online than most other web =
sites
do and you won't even need to have a website!

I don't want more <a href=3D"http://www.globalmarketin=
g2000.biz/remove.html">emails</a>
</body>
</html>

----443082222231751--

From [email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Sat, 28 Feb 2004 02:38:31 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i1SAcSUW012651;
Sat, 28 Feb 2004 02:38:28 -0800
Received: from chello062178083211.28.11.vie.surfer.at (chello062178083211.28.11.vie.surfer.at [62.178.83.211])
by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with SMTP id i1SAbBUV019461;
Sat, 28 Feb 2004 02:37:33 -0800
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
From: "Bernadine Wade" <[email protected]>
To: [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected]
Subject: You can't survive on just a paycheck
Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2004 06:36:12 -0400
X-Mailer: galena nil
chain-scram: abstractor flew incantation
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="--7185609054487116"
X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XXXXXXXXXIIIIIIIII, Probability=99%, Report='URI_CLASS_UNCLASSIFIED_DOMAIN 5, MIME_HTML_ONLY_MULTI 4.500, X_NJABL_OPEN_PROXY 3, BIZ_TLD 1.251, REMOVE_PAGE 1.210, __HAS_X_MAILER 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART_ALT 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CT 0, __CTYPE_HAS_BOUNDARY 0, __UNUSABLE_MSGID 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TAG_EXISTS_BODY 0, __MIME_HTML_ONLY 0, __TAG_EXISTS_META 0, __MIME_HTML 0, __TAG_EXISTS_HTML 0, __TAG_EXISTS_HEAD 0, RCVD_IN_NJABL_ORG 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, TO_HAS_SPACES 0.000'

----7185609054487116
Content-Type: text/html;
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<html>
<head>
<title> 121.16.23.40</title>
<meta http-equiv=3D"Content-Type" content=3D"text/html; charset=3Diso-8859=
-1">
</head>

<body>
 
In <a href=3D"http://www.globalmarketing2000.biz/cashinwithgoogle/">my =

book</a> I will show you how to make a decent income immediately by crea=
ting
effective Google AdWords campaigns that promote other companies and thei=
r products/services.
You will be paid each time your ad generates a sale or sign up!

I don't want any more <a href=3D"http://www.globalmark=
eting2000.biz/remove.html">emails</a>
</body>
</html>

----7185609054487116--

From [email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Sat, 28 Feb 2004 10:33:11 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i1SIX8lF025420;
Sat, 28 Feb 2004 10:33:08 -0800
Received: from 1-1-2-29a.ghn.gbg.bostream.se (1-1-2-29a.ghn.gbg.bostream.se [82.182.68.167])
by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with SMTP id i1SIWrAD005877;
Sat, 28 Feb 2004 10:33:00 -0800
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
From: "Garland Soto" <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Subject: The complete A-Z affiliate program
Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2004 15:28:50 -0300
X-Mailer: circa biconnected
effete-spoonful: boylston don't max
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="--19395200727817952501"
X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XXXXXXXXXIIIIIII, Probability=97%, Report='URI_CLASS_UNCLASSIFIED_DOMAIN 5, MIME_HTML_ONLY_MULTI 4.500, BIZ_TLD 1.251, REMOVE_PAGE 1.210, URI_HEAVY 0.206, HTML_50_70 0.092, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __HAS_X_MAILER 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART_ALT 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CT 0, __UNUSABLE_MSGID 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART 0, __NEW_DOMAIN_EXTENSIONS_2 0, __TAG_EXISTS_BODY 0, __MIME_HTML_ONLY 0, __TAG_EXISTS_META 0, __MIME_HTML 0, __TAG_EXISTS_HTML 0, __TAG_EXISTS_HEAD 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __CTYPE_HAS_BOUNDARY 0'

----19395200727817952501
Content-Type: text/html;
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<html>
<head>
<title>87.84.198.172</title>
<meta http-equiv=3D"Content-Type" content=3D"text/html; charset=3Diso-8859=
-1">
</head>

<body>
 
With <a href=3D"http://www.globalmarketing2000.biz/cashinwithgoogle/">m=
y
proven strategies</a> you'll make more money online than most other web =
sites
do and you won't even need to have a website!

I don't want more <a href=3D"http://www.globalmarketin=
g2000.biz/remove.html">emails</a>
</body>
</html>

----19395200727817952501--

From [email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Sat, 28 Feb 2004 16:26:19 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i1T0QFWY002358;
Sat, 28 Feb 2004 16:26:15 -0800
Received: from cable-150-193.inter.net.il (cable-150-193.inter.net.il [80.230.150.193])
by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with SMTP id i1T0PIQZ015023;
Sat, 28 Feb 2004 16:25:25 -0800
Received: from [75.158.49.149]
by cable-150-193.inter.net.il with ESMTP id <381238-35828>;
Sat, 28 Feb 2004 22:22:00 -0200
Message-ID: <opq2l6vx$2-w7bg3c$186x27z-$-$-s@fmtia33>
From: "Abdul Hoffman" <[email protected]>
Reply-To: "Abdul Hoffman" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>,
<[email protected]>,
<[email protected]>,
<[email protected]>, <[email protected]>,
<[email protected]>, <[email protected]>,
<[email protected]>, <[email protected]>,
<[email protected]>, <[email protected]>
Subject: Top analyst opinion for quick investor profits yfq ruooy
Date: Sat, 28 Feb 04 22:22:00 GMT
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2616
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="3.EB2.81A8.E9C_D5"
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XXXXXXXXXIIIIIIII, Probability=98%, Report='DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K 4.500, X_NJABL_OPEN_PROXY 3, NOT_ADVISOR 2.900, URGENT_BIZ 1.799, MISSING_MIMEOLE 1.103, US_DOLLARS_2 0.001, __ANY_OUTLOOK_MUA 0, __HAS_OUTLOOK_IN_MAILER 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART_ALT 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CT 0, __CTYPE_HAS_BOUNDARY 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART 0, __HAS_X_PRIORITY 0, __HAS_MSMAIL_PRI 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, MICRO_CAP_WARNING 0.000, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, RCVD_IN_NJABL_ORG 0, __OUTLOOK_MUA 0, FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK 0.000, __HAS_X_MAILER 0, MIME_TEXT_ONLY_MULTI 0'

--3.EB2.81A8.E9C_D5
Content-Type: text/plain;
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Wall Street Financial Times Newsletter

Specializing in Undervalued Small Cap Stocks for Immediate Breakout

We have the #1 track record for our picks in 2004:

GETC at .12 Currently .50 High .68 UP 467%
TLPE at 1.12 Currently 3.35 High 4.40 UP 293%
SWYC at .18 Currently .71 High .81 UP 350%
DNYY at .47 Currently 1.42 High 1.85 UP 294%

Immediate Investor Recommendation
Our Hottest Sales and Earnings Play
Projected to Triple in 7 Days:

Life Energy and Technology Holdings, Inc.
(OTCBB: LETH)

Price--- 1.35

Sales Orders Received '03--- over $150 Million +300% growth vs. '02
Est. Sales Growth '04--- +165%
Results from latest 10-Q:
Total Assets--- 36.8 million vs. 16.8 million
Cash--- 23.4 million vs. deficit
Shareholders Equity--- 12.0 million vs. 2.2 million
Shares Outstanding--- 29 mill
Est. Shares in Float--- 7 mill
Proj. Value Per Share--- 3.25 -- 3.50
Rating--- Urgent Buy

LETH is thriving as an emerging world leader in the conversion of waste
materials into electrical energy by utilizing their Biosphere Process Syst=
em,
making them the hottest undervalued stock at this price level where shares=

are ready to explode on huge investor attention.

Sales have rocketed beyond all estimates for LETH with no signs of
slowing. The numbers continue to stack-up as sales orders for the Biospher=
e
exceed $150 Million over the past year while the stock price doesn't yet
reflect the appearance of these impressive figures on an upcoming balance =

sheet. We are not the first to uncover this phenomenon as the stock is und=
er
accumulation, but we are acting aggressively on this recently filed data.

The unique proprietary technology of the Biosphere fills an urgent
worldwide need for cost-effective renewable energy sources and a
corresponding universal need to solve critical problems in the disposal of=

waste. The Biosphere System provides the highest level of innovative
technology while securing worldwide acceptance for a revolutionary product=

designed to significantly impact the global waste problem while
simultaneously generating electricity.

The Biosphere System enables LETH to draw revenue from the disposal of
various types of waste at 5 to 7 tons per hour including such materials as=
:
Municipal Solid Waste, refinery wastes, agricultural surpluses or effluent=
s,
medical waste, industrial waste, shale oil, sour natural gas, and the huge=

market of used tires are all converted in the Biosphere Process. LETH also=

profits from the sale of electricity created from the waste conversion on =
a
continuous basis by generating 5 to 10 mega-watts per hour of electricity =

which is then sold to replenish the local or national grid.

LETH is an alliance partner with Tetra Tech, Inc. (NASDAQ: TTEK, $20) a
leader and one of the largest providers in environmental, mechanical, and =

electrical management consulting services primarily for the US Government =

with annual sales of $800 Million. Tetra Tech will coordinate permitting, =

installation and continuous worldwide monitoring of the Biosphere Process =

System for LETH. Tetra Tech is now in the process of obtaining Department =

of Environmental Quality permitting for the Biosphere Process in the state=
of
Louisiana. This is a monumental event for LETH which opens the
floodgates for major project revenues in Louisiana while having a parallel=

effect on LETH stock in the form of a huge near-term announcement.

LETH has begun to catch the profit-making attention of investors by
embracing a major foothold on the global waste problem while a major push =

for generating electricity from alternative sources continues to be the ho=
t
topic due to shortages and massive power failures. LETH contains all the
ingredients for major profits as global demand to solve two crisis areas, =

waste and electrical energy, reaches unprecedented levels. We view this
perfectly timed convergence of events as the catalyst for additional contr=
acts
that will perpetuate the shattering of the Company's own sales records. We=

are seeing substantial gains for early investors in a ground floor opportu=
nity
that carries our highest rating for short-term trading profits.

Required LETH information: Certain statements contained in this newsletter=

may be forward looking statements within the meaning of The Private
Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such terms as "expect", "believe=
",
"may", "will", and "intend" or similar terms may identify these statements=

We are not a registered investment advisor or a broker dealer. This is not=
an
offer to buy or sell securities. No recommendation that the securities of =
the
companies profiled should be purchased, sold or held by individuals or
entities that learn of the profiled companies. This is an independent
electronic publication that was paid five thousand dollars by an unaffilia=
ted
third party for the preparation of this company information. Be advised th=
at
investments in companies profiled are considered to be high-risk and use o=
f
the content provided is for information purposes only. If anyone decides t=
o
act as an investor they are advised not to invest without the proper guida=
nce
from a financial advisor or a registered financial broker. If any party de=
cides
to participate as an investor then it will be that investor's sole risk. B=
e
advised that the purchase of such high-risk securities may result in the l=
oss
of some or all of the investment. Investors should not rely solely on the =

information presented. Rather, investors should use the information provid=
ed
in this newsletter as a starting point for doing additional independent
research on the profiled companies in order to allow the investor to form =

their own opinion regarding investing in the profiled companies. Factual
statements made about the profiled companies are made as of the date state=
d
and are subject to change without notice. Investing in micro-cap securitie=
s is
highly speculative and carries an extremely high degree of risk. All
information provided about the profiled companies may include information =

provided by outside sources, such as research reports, public filings, and=

information provided by management of the profiled company.

evie

--3.EB2.81A8.E9C_D5--

From [email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Sat, 28 Feb 2004 19:01:16 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i1T31DqP007079;
Sat, 28 Feb 2004 19:01:13 -0800
Received: from host-242.vikeda.com ([206.222.73.214])
by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with SMTP id i1T30MlE019229;
Sat, 28 Feb 2004 19:00:23 -0800
Received: from 154.60.236.176 by 216.191.85.242; Sun, 29 Feb 2004 03:52:59 +0100
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
From: "Carlo Curry" <[email protected]>
Reply-To: "Carlo Curry" <[email protected]>
To: [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected],
[email protected]
Subject: Outstanding Amount
Date: Sun, 29 Feb 2004 06:58:59 +0400
X-Mailer: AOL 7.0 for Windows US sub 118
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="--8073757835882048015"
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XXXXXXXXXX, Probability=100%, Report='URI_CLASS_UNCLASSIFIED_DOMAIN 5, MIME_HTML_ONLY_MULTI 4.500, FORGED_MUA_AOL_FROM 4.400, SUSPICIOUS_RECIPS 2.799, SORTED_RECIPS 1.332, BIZ_TLD 1.251, REMOVE_PAGE 1.210, MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME 1.110, MISSING_MIMEOLE 1.103, FORGED_YAHOO_RCVD 0.659, HTML_70_90 0.572, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, TO_HAS_SPACES 0.000, __HAS_X_MAILER 0, __AOL_MUA 0, __HAS_MSMAIL_PRI 0, __HAS_X_PRIORITY 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART 0, __CTYPE_HAS_BOUNDARY 0, __CT 0, __TAG_EXISTS_BODY 0, __MIME_HTML_ONLY 0, __TAG_EXISTS_META 0, __MIME_HTML 0, __TAG_EXISTS_HTML 0, __TAG_EXISTS_HEAD 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART_ALT 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __ANY_AOL_MUA 0'

----8073757835882048015
Content-Type: text/html;
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<html>
<head>
<title>Untitled Document</title>
<meta http-equiv=3D"Content-Type" content=3D"text/html; charset=3Diso-8859=
-1">
</head>

<body>
<table width=3D"75%" border=3D"1" cellpadding=3D"3" bordercolor=3D"#FF0000=
">
<tr>
<td width=3D"47%"> 
Do y=
ou want
to be paid just for providing your opinion?
 </td>
<td width=3D"53%"><form action=3D"http://www.globalmarketing2000.biz/s=
urveys/index.htm" method=3D"get" name=3D"form1" target=3D"_self">
<div align=3D"center">
<input type=3D"submit" name=3D"YES" value=3D"YES">
<input name=3D"NO" type=3D"submit" id=3D"NO" value=3D"NO">
</div>
</form></td>
</tr>
</table>
 
<form name=3D"form2" method=3D"get" action=3D"http://www.globalmarketing20=
00.biz/remove.html">
<input name=3D"del" type=3D"submit" id=3D"del" value=3D"Remove me">
</form>
 
 
 
</body>
</html>

----8073757835882048015--

From [email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Sat, 28 Feb 2004 22:29:46 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i1T6TgxZ011827;
Sat, 28 Feb 2004 22:29:42 -0800
Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100])
by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i1T6TFM7015918
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO);
Sat, 28 Feb 2004 22:29:16 -0800
Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13])
by list3.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with SMTP id i1T6T40I014562;
Sat, 28 Feb 2004 22:29:04 -0800
Received: from mxu9.u.washington.edu (mxu9.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.174])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i1T6Rggx090510
for <[email protected]>; Sat, 28 Feb 2004 22:27:42 -0800
Received: from mxout1.cac.washington.edu (mxout1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.134])
by mxu9.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i1T6Rf6M030155
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO)
for <[email protected]>; Sat, 28 Feb 2004 22:27:42 -0800
Received: from smtp.washington.edu (smtp.washington.edu [140.142.33.9])
by mxout1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i1T6RfKY005604
for <[email protected]>; Sat, 28 Feb 2004 22:27:41 -0800
Received: from shiva0.cac.washington.edu (shiva0.cac.washington.edu [140.142.100.200])
(authenticated bits=0)
by smtp.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i1T6Re66032275
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NOT)
for <[email protected]>; Sat, 28 Feb 2004 22:27:41 -0800
Message-Id: <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2004 22:27:40 -0800 (PST)
Sender: [email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
From: Steve Hubert <[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Need help regarding Pine version, design documentation and test
suite
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
X-To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0'
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN

On Thu, 26 Feb 2004 [email protected] wrote:

> I am planning to go for pine program as a case study in my research. I was
> able to download the software but i have problem downloading the version
> which i want.
> 1.I want to download pine4.50 and when i clicked on that its going to the
> page where i can download the software but ultimately when i downloaded
> the software its showing pine4.58 which is the current version. How to
> download the version which i want?

You can find old source at ftp://ftp.cac.washington.edu in the directory
/pine/old. Pine4.58 is sort of 4.50 with most of the bugs worked out.

> Since pine is a open source program
>
> 2. Is there proper design
> documentation and architecture for pine? If so where can I get it.

No such thing exists. Pine has been developed by a very small group of
people at the Univ. of Washington. Since it is such a small group there
has been no need for formal design plans. We just talk to each other.

> 3.Does pine program has proper test suites? If so where can i find them

No, unfortunately it does not.

> I will appreciate your help.
>
> Best regards,
> Sunil.

Steve Hubert <[email protected]>
Pine Development Team, Univ. of Washington, Seattle

From [email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Sun, 29 Feb 2004 17:15:19 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i211FIS0014098;
Sun, 29 Feb 2004 17:15:18 -0800
Received: from list2.u.washington.edu (list2.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.165])
by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i211EWfh024620
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO);
Sun, 29 Feb 2004 17:14:32 -0800
Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13])
by list2.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with SMTP id i211EKBk008794;
Sun, 29 Feb 2004 17:14:20 -0800
Received: from mxu5.u.washington.edu (mxu5.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.164])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i211DSmb053526
for <[email protected]>; Sun, 29 Feb 2004 17:13:28 -0800
Received: from fezes (200-162-198-223.sao.ajato.com.br [200.162.198.223] (may be forged))
by mxu5.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with SMTP id i211DD7Q028980
for <[email protected]>; Sun, 29 Feb 2004 17:13:14 -0800
Message-Id: <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 29 Feb 2004 22:12:30 -0300
Sender: [email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
From: [email protected]
To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
Subject: Gallery photos
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed;
boundary="--------bqumiavhscuogbqxjgmd"
X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='LINES_OF_YELLING 0.001, __HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, NO_REAL_NAME 0.000, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT 0, __CTYPE_HAS_BOUNDARY 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART 0, __PORN_PHRASE_15_0 0, MAY_BE_FORGED 0.000, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0'
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN

----------bqumiavhscuogbqxjgmd
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Argh, i don't like the plaintext :)

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
+ POSSIBLE VIRUS DELETED +
+ +
+ One or more attachments were included with this message. +
+ The names or file types of the attachments match those used +
+ by a newly discovered virus that our anti-virus tools do not +
+ yet recognize. To prevent infecting campus users, these +
+ attachments have been removed from this message. +
+ +
+ If the sender of the message is known to you, and you were +
+ expecting the attachments, you will need to make arrangements +
+ with the sender to receive the attachments by other means or +
+ wait until the block on these file types has been dropped. +
+ +
+ If the sender is not known to you, it is possible that this +
+ is actually generated by the newly discovered virus and you +
+ may safely delete and ignore this message. +
+ +
+ Further information may be found on the Major Computing and +
+ Network outages page at +
+ http://www.washington.edu/computing/outages/ +
+ C&C will also post any updates to the Outages page as well as +
+ as a notice once the block has been removed. +
+ +
+ Please contact help@cac or your local computing support team +
+ if you have further questions. +
+ +
+ Computing & Communications +
+ University of Washington +
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

----------bqumiavhscuogbqxjgmd--
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------
For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see:
http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/
-----------------------------------------------------------------