From
[email protected] Wed Jan 2 03:22:39 2002 -0800
Return-Path: <
[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Wed, 2 Jan 2002 03:22:39 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <
[email protected]>
Received: from mailscan2.cac.washington.edu (mailscan2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.16])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW01.12) with SMTP id g02BMbV6024283
for <
[email protected]>; Wed, 2 Jan 2002 03:22:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: FROM mx1.cac.washington.edu BY mailscan2.cac.washington.edu ; Wed Jan 02 03:22:31 2002 -0800
Received: from list1.u.washington.edu (list1.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.99])
by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW01.12) with ESMTP id g02BMUpr009613;
Wed, 2 Jan 2002 03:22:30 -0800
Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13])
by list1.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.10) with SMTP id g02BLg538862;
Wed, 2 Jan 2002 03:21:42 -0800
Received: from mailscan5.cac.washington.edu (mailscan5.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.14])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.10) with SMTP id g02BFjn81028
for <
[email protected]>; Wed, 2 Jan 2002 03:15:46 -0800
Received: FROM mxu4.u.washington.edu BY mailscan5.cac.washington.edu ; Wed Jan 02 03:15:41 2002 -0800
Received: from lantana.iitm.ernet.in (lantana.tenet.res.in [202.144.28.166])
by mxu4.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW01.12) with ESMTP id g02BFXVK031475
for <
[email protected]>; Wed, 2 Jan 2002 03:15:38 -0800
Received: from localhost (bharathi@localhost)
by lantana.iitm.ernet.in (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id g02BFtA27993;
Wed, 2 Jan 2002 16:45:56 +0530
Message-Id: <
[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2002 16:45:54 +0530 (IST)
Sender:
[email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <
http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:
[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:
[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:
[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:
[email protected]>
From: S Bharathi <
[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <
[email protected]>
Subject: Re: i18n Support
In-Reply-To: <
[email protected]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-To: Bob Rasmussen <
[email protected]>
X-Cc: S Bharathi <
[email protected]>,
Pine Discussion Forum <
[email protected]>
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN
X-IMAPbase: 1015298700 128
Status: O
X-Status:
X-Keywords:
X-UID: 1
Hello Sir,
Thanks for reply,
On Mon, 31 Dec 2001, Bob Rasmussen wrote:
> On Mon, 31 Dec 2001, S Bharathi wrote:
> > If any plan to include i18n support in Pine.
> > If yes, Anybody is currently working in this area ?
>
> * I have configured Pine to use "display-filters", such that messages on
> certain charsets are sent through "iconv" (available in Linux) to translate to
> UTF-8.
What is display-filters ? I have no idea about it.
> * I patched Pine so that it does not clear-screen before and after using a
> display-filter.
I did some modification in pine4.33 with Gettext for I18N. Whatever i
did is only for menu and error mesg . Nothing for Encoding because i have
very less knowledge about it.
> * I have not yet figured out how to make Pine translate headers, such as the
> "From:" and "Subject:" lines, according to their embedded charset identifiers.
> In fact, these can sometimes confuse the UTF rendering in Anzio. This is the
> highest priority for me.
Yes, I am also having same problem and Refresh probelm in keymenu.
> Regards,
> ....Bob Rasmussen, President, Rasmussen Software, Inc.
If you need i will send the scr shot of modified pine, pico & pilot.
Thank you,
--
_ _ S. Bharathi
[email protected] (BSB-340)
(_ |_) Prj Associate, IndLinuX Developement Team, (4458904)
_)*|_) LLI Lab, IIT-Madras, INDIA - 600036.
From
[email protected] Wed Jan 2 10:15:14 2002 -0800
Return-Path: <
[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Wed, 2 Jan 2002 10:15:14 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <
[email protected]>
Received: from mailscan3.cac.washington.edu (mailscan3.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.15])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW01.12) with SMTP id g02IFDV6026097
for <
[email protected]>; Wed, 2 Jan 2002 10:15:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: FROM mx2.cac.washington.edu BY mailscan3.cac.washington.edu ; Wed Jan 02 10:15:11 2002 -0800
Received: from list2.u.washington.edu (list2.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.165])
by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW01.12) with ESMTP id g02IFB11022181;
Wed, 2 Jan 2002 10:15:11 -0800
Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13])
by list2.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.10) with SMTP id g02IEk412742;
Wed, 2 Jan 2002 10:14:46 -0800
Received: from mailscan6.cac.washington.edu (mailscan6.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.14])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.10) with SMTP id g02HxJn102692
for <
[email protected]>; Wed, 2 Jan 2002 09:59:20 -0800
Received: FROM mxu2.u.washington.edu BY mailscan6.cac.washington.edu ; Wed Jan 02 09:59:15 2002 -0800
Received: from nimbus.anzio.com ([66.129.212.98])
by mxu2.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW01.12) with ESMTP id g02Hx93F013659
for <
[email protected]>; Wed, 2 Jan 2002 09:59:14 -0800
Received: from localhost (ras@localhost)
by nimbus.anzio.com (8.11.2/8.11.0) with ESMTP id g02Hjrl18581;
Wed, 2 Jan 2002 09:45:53 -0800
Message-Id: <
[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2002 09:45:53 -0800 (PST)
Sender:
[email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <
http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:
[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:
[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:
[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:
[email protected]>
From: Bob Rasmussen <
[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <
[email protected]>
Subject: Re: i18n Support
In-Reply-To: <
[email protected]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-To: S Bharathi <
[email protected]>
X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum <
[email protected]>
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN
Status: O
X-Status:
X-Keywords:
X-UID: 2
On Wed, 2 Jan 2002, S Bharathi wrote:
> What is display-filters ? I have no idea about it.
This is a feature built into Pine (for Unix) that lets you send certain
messages through a Unix filter before being displayed. See the ".pinerc". For
instance, mine reads:
display-filters=_charset(big5)_ ~/viewutf8 big5,
_charset(windows-1250)_ ~/viewutf8 windows-1250,
_charset(windows-1251)_ ~/viewutf8 windows-1251,
_charset(windows-1252)_ ~/viewutf8 windows-1252,
_charset(windows-1253)_ ~/viewutf8 windows-1253,
_charset(windows-1254)_ ~/viewutf8 windows-1254,
_charset(windows-1255)_ ~/viewutf8 windows-1255,
_charset(windows-1256)_ ~/viewutf8 windows-1256,
_charset(windows-1257)_ ~/viewutf8 windows-1257,
_charset(us-ascii)_ ~/viewutf8 windows-1252,
_charset(iso-8859-1)_ ~/viewutf8 iso-8859-1,
_charset(iso-8859-2)_ ~/viewutf8 iso-8859-2,
_charset(iso-8859-3)_ ~/viewutf8 iso-8859-3,
_charset(iso-8859-4)_ ~/viewutf8 iso-8859-4,
_charset(iso-8859-5)_ ~/viewutf8 iso-8859-5,
_charset(iso-8859-6)_ ~/viewutf8 iso-8859-6,
_charset(iso-8859-7)_ ~/viewutf8 iso-8859-7,
_charset(iso-8859-8)_ ~/viewutf8 iso-8859-8,
_charset(iso-8859-9)_ ~/viewutf8 iso-8859-9,
_charset(gb2312)_ ~/viewutf8 gb2312,
_charset(koi8-r)_ ~/viewutf8 koi8-r
The "viewutf8" is a one-line script that reads:
iconv --from-code=$1 --to-code=utf-8
So for instance, if Pine is displaying a message with a charset of gb2312
(Chinese), it sends it through iconv (included with Linux, available for
others) to convert it to UTF-8 (Unicode), which the telnet client can display.
Regards,
...Bob Rasmussen, President, Rasmussen Software, Inc.
personal e-mail:
[email protected]
company e-mail:
[email protected]
voice: (US) 503-624-0360 (9:00-6:00 Pacific Time)
fax: (US) 503-624-0760
web:
http://www.anzio.com
From
[email protected] Wed Jan 2 11:44:04 2002 -0800
Return-Path: <
[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Wed, 2 Jan 2002 11:44:01 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <
[email protected]>
Received: from mailscan5.cac.washington.edu (mailscan5.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.14])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW01.12) with SMTP id g02JhxV6031277
for <
[email protected]>; Wed, 2 Jan 2002 11:44:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: FROM mx1.cac.washington.edu BY mailscan5.cac.washington.edu ; Wed Jan 02 11:43:51 2002 -0800
Received: from list2.u.washington.edu (list2.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.165])
by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW01.12) with ESMTP id g02Jhppr021387;
Wed, 2 Jan 2002 11:43:51 -0800
Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13])
by list2.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.10) with SMTP id g02JhS422338;
Wed, 2 Jan 2002 11:43:29 -0800
Received: from mailscan2.cac.washington.edu (mailscan2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.16])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.10) with SMTP id g02JgOn162696
for <
[email protected]>; Wed, 2 Jan 2002 11:42:24 -0800
Received: FROM mxu4.u.washington.edu BY mailscan2.cac.washington.edu ; Wed Jan 02 11:42:23 2002 -0800
Received: from jinx.unknown.nu (jinx.unknown.nu [216.80.99.202])
by mxu4.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW01.12) with ESMTP id g02JgNVK011561
for <
[email protected]>; Wed, 2 Jan 2002 11:42:23 -0800
Received: by jinx.unknown.nu (Postfix, from userid 1023)
id EB621316E; Wed, 2 Jan 2002 13:42:22 -0600 (CST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by jinx.unknown.nu (Postfix) with ESMTP
id E6CD54A80; Wed, 2 Jan 2002 13:42:22 -0600 (CST)
Message-Id: <
[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2002 13:42:22 -0600 (CST)
Sender:
[email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <
http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:
[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:
[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:
[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:
[email protected]>
From: Kim Scarborough <
[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <
[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Color support under FreeBSD
In-Reply-To: <
[email protected]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-To: Nils Holland <
[email protected]>
X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum <
[email protected]>
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN
Status: O
X-Status:
X-Keywords:
X-UID: 3
A little late piping up in this thread, sorry...
> With color support turned on (no matter which one of the three options
> that are available is selected), the screen gets pretty much messed up. All
> lines seem to get redrawn exactly one line below their original position.
> As a result of that, the entries in pine's menues get displayed twice, and
> that just looks kind of strange.
I've been complaining about this bug since 4.20. Somebody sent me a patch
for it and said he submitted it, but it was never committed. I don't
want to be a pest, but I have to apply that patch with each new version.
Is there a way to find out what's going on with this?
By the way, the fix is to change line 210 in pine/screen.c from
"if(i == 1 && !label_color)" to
"if(i == 1)".
I've lost the name of the fellow who sent it to me, unfortunately...
hopefully he's still on this list.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Kim Scarborough
http://www.unknown.nu/kim/
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Being in politics is like being a football coach. You have to be smart
enough to understand the game and dumb enough to think it's important."
-Eugene McCarthy
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From
[email protected] Wed Jan 2 19:45:06 2002 -0800
Return-Path: <
[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Wed, 2 Jan 2002 19:45:05 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <
[email protected]>
Received: from mailscan1.cac.washington.edu (mailscan1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.16])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW01.12) with SMTP id g033j3V6015979
for <
[email protected]>; Wed, 2 Jan 2002 19:45:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: FROM mx1.cac.washington.edu BY mailscan1.cac.washington.edu ; Wed Jan 02 19:44:59 2002 -0800
Received: from list1.u.washington.edu (list1.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.99])
by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW01.12) with ESMTP id g033ixpr002129;
Wed, 2 Jan 2002 19:44:59 -0800
Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13])
by list1.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.10) with SMTP id g033iF540950;
Wed, 2 Jan 2002 19:44:15 -0800
Received: from mailscan3.cac.washington.edu (mailscan3.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.15])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.10) with SMTP id g033gQn170930
for <
[email protected]>; Wed, 2 Jan 2002 19:42:26 -0800
Received: FROM mxu2.u.washington.edu BY mailscan3.cac.washington.edu ; Wed Jan 02 19:42:25 2002 -0800
Received: from rwja.umdnj.edu (rwja.UMDNJ.EDU [130.219.4.100])
by mxu2.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW01.12) with ESMTP id g033gP3F008505
for <
[email protected]>; Wed, 2 Jan 2002 19:42:25 -0800
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by rwja.umdnj.edu (8.9.3 (PHNE_18546)/8.9.3) with ESMTP id WAA02754;
Wed, 2 Jan 2002 22:42:28 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <
[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2002 22:42:28 -0500 (EST)
Sender:
[email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <
http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:
[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:
[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:
[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:
[email protected]>
From: Cliff Green <
[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <
[email protected]>
Subject: Re: feature request: choose smtp server
In-Reply-To: <Pine.WNT.4.43.0112311000310.-436463@oemcomputer>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-To: Nancy McGough <
[email protected]>
X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum <
[email protected]>
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN
Status: O
X-Status:
X-Keywords:
X-UID: 4
On Mon, 31 Dec 2001, Nancy McGough wrote:
NM> On 27 Dec 2001 Joel Boonstra (
[email protected]) wrote:
NM> > I have a laptop that I bring to and from the office with me. It uses RH
NM> > 7.1, with Pine 4.43, patched with Eduardo's excellent fancy thread patch.
NM>
NM> Here are 3 possible solutions.
NM>
NM> 1] In your pinerc, set
NM>
NM> smtp-server=localhost
NM>
NM> and then set up ssh port forwarding to forward your machine's
NM> port 25 to your work machine's SMTP server. This should then work
NM> whether you are at home or work because the requests to your work
NM> SMTP server will appear to be local.
NM>
NM> I've done this with PC-Pine and SecureCRT port forwarding but
NM> I've never done it from a Linux box. If anyone has successfully
NM> done this on *nix, I'd appreciate info so I can 1) try it and 2)
NM> add info about it in my Using Port Forwarding with Pine, which is
NM> here
NM>
NM> <
http://www.ii.com/internet/messaging/pine/pc/#ssh>
For this, ssh needs to be run by root - ports 25 and 143 (if you're also
forwarding imap) are privileged ports.
I've used:
"ssh -l <myaccount> -L 25:my.mail.host:25 -L 143:my.mail.host:143 my.host.name"
(that's one line - watch for linewrap)
Again, this is run by root (it *is* your own linux box, right?), but the
'-l accountname' can be an ordinary user on the remote host.
c
--
Clifford Green Internet -
[email protected]
Academic Computing Services UMDNJ-IST
From
[email protected] Wed Jan 2 19:56:08 2002 -0800
Return-Path: <
[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Wed, 2 Jan 2002 19:56:08 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <
[email protected]>
Received: from mailscan5.cac.washington.edu (mailscan5.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.14])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW01.12) with SMTP id g033u6V6001248
for <
[email protected]>; Wed, 2 Jan 2002 19:56:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: FROM mx1.cac.washington.edu BY mailscan5.cac.washington.edu ; Wed Jan 02 19:56:02 2002 -0800
Received: from list1.u.washington.edu (list1.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.99])
by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW01.12) with ESMTP id g033u1pr002319;
Wed, 2 Jan 2002 19:56:01 -0800
Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13])
by list1.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.10) with SMTP id g033tJ519446;
Wed, 2 Jan 2002 19:55:19 -0800
Received: from mailscan5.cac.washington.edu (mailscan5.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.14])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.10) with SMTP id g033sHn170918
for <
[email protected]>; Wed, 2 Jan 2002 19:54:17 -0800
Received: FROM mxu1.u.washington.edu BY mailscan5.cac.washington.edu ; Wed Jan 02 19:54:16 2002 -0800
Received: from moultrie.cse.sc.edu ([129.252.138.7])
by mxu1.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW01.12) with ESMTP id g033sGTA029627
for <
[email protected]>; Wed, 2 Jan 2002 19:54:16 -0800
Received: from mum.cse.sc.edu (mum.cse.sc.edu [129.252.138.21])
by moultrie.cse.sc.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5436B1FA25
for <
[email protected]>; Wed, 2 Jan 2002 22:54:15 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <
[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2002 22:54:15 -0500 (EST)
Sender:
[email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <
http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:
[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:
[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:
[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:
[email protected]>
From: Gopi Sundaram <
[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <
[email protected]>
Subject: Re: feature request: choose smtp server
In-Reply-To: <
[email protected]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE
X-To: Pine Discussion Forum <
[email protected]>
X-X-Sender:
[email protected]
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN
Status: O
X-Status:
X-Keywords:
X-UID: 5
On Wed, 2 Jan 2002, Cliff Green wrote:
> NM> <
http://www.ii.com/internet/messaging/pine/pc/#ssh>
>
> For this, ssh needs to be run by root - ports 25 and 143 (if you're
> also forwarding imap) are privileged ports.
They are privileged ports (as is anything less than 1024), but you don't
have to bind to those ports. You can forward to other ports like 1043,
1025 etc. and then add the port number to the server specification, eg:
smtp-server=3Dlocalhost:2250/user=3Dxyzzy
Tr=E8s simple, no?
--=20
Gopi Sundaram
[email protected]
http://www.cse.sc.edu/~gopalan/Pine/
From
[email protected] Wed Jan 2 21:19:52 2002 -0800
Return-Path: <
[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Wed, 2 Jan 2002 21:19:51 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <
[email protected]>
Received: from mailscan5.cac.washington.edu (mailscan5.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.14])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW01.12) with SMTP id g035JoV6031306
for <
[email protected]>; Wed, 2 Jan 2002 21:19:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: FROM mx1.cac.washington.edu BY mailscan5.cac.washington.edu ; Wed Jan 02 21:19:49 2002 -0800
Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100])
by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW01.12) with ESMTP id g035Jmpr003711;
Wed, 2 Jan 2002 21:19:48 -0800
Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13])
by list3.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.10) with SMTP id g035Io209912;
Wed, 2 Jan 2002 21:18:50 -0800
Received: from mailscan3.cac.washington.edu (mailscan3.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.15])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.10) with SMTP id g035I8n47964
for <
[email protected]>; Wed, 2 Jan 2002 21:18:08 -0800
Received: FROM mxu3.u.washington.edu BY mailscan3.cac.washington.edu ; Wed Jan 02 21:18:07 2002 -0800
Received: from Tomobiki-Cho.CAC.Washington.EDU (tomobiki-cho.cac.washington.edu [128.95.135.58])
by mxu3.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW01.12) with ESMTP id g035I7m1027989
for <
[email protected]>; Wed, 2 Jan 2002 21:18:07 -0800
Message-Id: <Pine.NXT.4.50.0201022117350.19089-100000@Tomobiki-Cho.CAC.Washington.EDU>
Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2002 21:18:02 -0800 (PST)
Sender:
[email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <
http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:
[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:
[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:
[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:
[email protected]>
From: Mark Crispin <
[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <
[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Your message (no subject found) #011227@15:02:32.1096
In-Reply-To: <
[email protected]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-To: Bruce Cohen <
[email protected]>
X-Cc:
[email protected], <
[email protected]>,
<
[email protected]>
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN
Status: O
X-Status:
X-Keywords:
X-UID: 6
On Fri, 28 Dec 2001, Bruce Cohen wrote:
> [Error writing scratch file at byte 8191][><][]
Are you out of disk space on /tmp or /var/tmp?
-- Mark --
http://staff.washington.edu/mrc
Science does not emerge from voting, party politics, or public debate.
From
[email protected] Wed Jan 2 22:50:09 2002 -0800
Return-Path: <
[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Wed, 2 Jan 2002 22:50:08 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <
[email protected]>
Received: from mailscan2.cac.washington.edu (mailscan2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.16])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW01.12) with SMTP id g036o7V6027505
for <
[email protected]>; Wed, 2 Jan 2002 22:50:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: FROM mx2.cac.washington.edu BY mailscan2.cac.washington.edu ; Wed Jan 02 22:49:59 2002 -0800
Received: from list2.u.washington.edu (list2.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.165])
by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW01.12) with ESMTP id g036nx11008351;
Wed, 2 Jan 2002 22:49:59 -0800
Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13])
by list2.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.10) with SMTP id g036nP421796;
Wed, 2 Jan 2002 22:49:26 -0800
Received: from mailscan6.cac.washington.edu (mailscan6.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.14])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.10) with SMTP id g036mPn67800
for <
[email protected]>; Wed, 2 Jan 2002 22:48:25 -0800
Received: FROM mxu1.u.washington.edu BY mailscan6.cac.washington.edu ; Wed Jan 02 22:48:21 2002 -0800
Received: from rwja.umdnj.edu (rwja.UMDNJ.EDU [130.219.4.100])
by mxu1.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW01.12) with ESMTP id g036mLTA016280
for <
[email protected]>; Wed, 2 Jan 2002 22:48:21 -0800
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by rwja.umdnj.edu (8.9.3 (PHNE_18546)/8.9.3) with ESMTP id BAA08066;
Thu, 3 Jan 2002 01:48:21 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <
[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2002 01:48:21 -0500 (EST)
Sender:
[email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <
http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:
[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:
[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:
[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:
[email protected]>
From: Cliff Green <
[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <
[email protected]>
Subject: Re: feature request: choose smtp server
In-Reply-To: <
[email protected]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-To: Gopi Sundaram <
[email protected]>
X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum <
[email protected]>
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN
Status: O
X-Status:
X-Keywords:
X-UID: 7
On Wed, 2 Jan 2002, Gopi Sundaram wrote:
GS> On Wed, 2 Jan 2002, Cliff Green wrote:
GS>
GS> > NM> <
http://www.ii.com/internet/messaging/pine/pc/#ssh>
GS> >
GS> > For this, ssh needs to be run by root - ports 25 and 143 (if you're
GS> > also forwarding imap) are privileged ports.
GS>
GS> They are privileged ports (as is anything less than 1024), but you don't
GS> have to bind to those ports. You can forward to other ports like 1043,
GS> 1025 etc. and then add the port number to the server specification, eg:
GS>
GS> smtp-server=localhost:2250/user=xyzzy
Yeah, I guess you could take that route. I just prefer making ssh do the
work and let it be transparent to the client(s). YMMV.
c
--
Clifford Green Internet -
[email protected]
Academic Computing Services UMDNJ-IST
From
[email protected] Wed Jan 2 22:56:40 2002 -0800
Return-Path: <
[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Wed, 2 Jan 2002 22:56:40 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <
[email protected]>
Received: from mailscan4.cac.washington.edu (mailscan4.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.15])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW01.12) with SMTP id g036ucV6018870
for <
[email protected]>; Wed, 2 Jan 2002 22:56:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: FROM mx1.cac.washington.edu BY mailscan4.cac.washington.edu ; Wed Jan 02 22:56:37 2002 -0800
Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100])
by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW01.12) with ESMTP id g036ubpr005293;
Wed, 2 Jan 2002 22:56:37 -0800
Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13])
by list3.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.10) with SMTP id g036u7209836;
Wed, 2 Jan 2002 22:56:07 -0800
Received: from mailscan6.cac.washington.edu (mailscan6.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.14])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.10) with SMTP id g036tjn30536
for <
[email protected]>; Wed, 2 Jan 2002 22:55:45 -0800
Received: FROM mxu2.u.washington.edu BY mailscan6.cac.washington.edu ; Wed Jan 02 22:55:44 2002 -0800
Received: from rhea.tiscali.nl (rhea.tiscali.nl [195.241.76.178])
by mxu2.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW01.12) with ESMTP id g036th3F028083
for <
[email protected]>; Wed, 2 Jan 2002 22:55:44 -0800
Received: from shell.worldonline.nl (shell.tiscali.nl [195.241.77.35])
by rhea.tiscali.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP
id A1CD136B4A; Thu, 3 Jan 2002 07:55:42 +0100 (MET)
Received: from localhost (cohenb@localhost)
by shell.worldonline.nl (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.1) with ESMTP id HAA14863;
Thu, 3 Jan 2002 07:55:40 +0100 (MET)
Message-Id: <
[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2002 07:55:40 +0100 (MET)
Sender:
[email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <
http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:
[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:
[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:
[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:
[email protected]>
From: Bruce Cohen <
[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <
[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Your message (no subject found) #011227@15:02:32.1096
In-Reply-To: <Pine.NXT.4.50.0201022117350.19089-100000@Tomobiki-Cho.CAC.Washington.EDU>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-To: Mark Crispin <
[email protected]>
X-Cc: <
[email protected]>, <
[email protected]>,
<
[email protected]>
X-Authentication-Warning: shell.worldonline.nl: cohenb owned process doing -bs
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN
Status: O
X-Status:
X-Keywords:
X-UID: 8
I have no idea - how can I tell? (for the future, that is - whatever was
wrong has been fixed - about 12 hours after this started everything
collapsed at worldonline/tiscali and it took another half day before
they got things back up and running)
I take it then that this isn't a bug but known pine behavior...
Thanks for responding
Bruce Cohen
On Wed, 2 Jan 2002, Mark Crispin
wrote:
> On Fri, 28 Dec 2001, Bruce Cohen wrote:
> > [Error writing scratch file at byte 8191][><][]
>
> Are you out of disk space on /tmp or /var/tmp?
>
> -- Mark --
>
>
http://staff.washington.edu/mrc
> Science does not emerge from voting, party politics, or public debate.
>
>
>
From
[email protected] Thu Jan 3 00:54:23 2002 -0800
Return-Path: <
[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 3 Jan 2002 00:54:23 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <
[email protected]>
Received: from mailscan2.cac.washington.edu (mailscan2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.16])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW01.12) with SMTP id g038sMV6004271
for <
[email protected]>; Thu, 3 Jan 2002 00:54:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: FROM mx2.cac.washington.edu BY mailscan2.cac.washington.edu ; Thu Jan 03 00:54:21 2002 -0800
Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100])
by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW01.12) with ESMTP id g038sK11010455;
Thu, 3 Jan 2002 00:54:20 -0800
Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13])
by list3.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.10) with SMTP id g038rp217546;
Thu, 3 Jan 2002 00:53:52 -0800
Received: from mailscan6.cac.washington.edu (mailscan6.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.14])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.10) with SMTP id g038qon06758
for <
[email protected]>; Thu, 3 Jan 2002 00:52:50 -0800
Received: FROM mxu4.u.washington.edu BY mailscan6.cac.washington.edu ; Thu Jan 03 00:52:46 2002 -0800
Received: from mxout1.cac.washington.edu (mxout1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.5])
by mxu4.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW01.12) with ESMTP id g038qkVK010440
for <
[email protected]>; Thu, 3 Jan 2002 00:52:46 -0800
Received: from smtp.washington.edu (smtp.washington.edu [140.142.32.12])
by mxout1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW01.12) with ESMTP id g038qj8W003534;
Thu, 3 Jan 2002 00:52:45 -0800
Received: from Shimo-Tomobiki.Panda.COM (mes128085095.airdata.net [166.128.85.95])
(authenticated bits=0)
by smtp.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW01.12) with ESMTP id g038qOkg001281
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NO);
Thu, 3 Jan 2002 00:52:40 -0800
Message-Id: <
[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2002 00:52:21 -0800 (Pacific Standard Time)
Sender:
[email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <
http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:
[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:
[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:
[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:
[email protected]>
From: Mark Crispin <
[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <
[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Your message (no subject found) #011227@15:02:32.1096
In-Reply-To: <
[email protected]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-Sender:
[email protected]
X-To: Bruce Cohen <
[email protected]>
X-Cc:
[email protected], <
[email protected]>,
<
[email protected]>
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN
Status: O
X-Status:
X-Keywords:
X-UID: 9
On Thu, 3 Jan 2002, Bruce Cohen wrote:
> I have no idea - how can I tell?
"df /tmp" or "df /var/tmp" will show you how much disk is available on
/tmp and /var/tmp respectively.
> I take it then that this isn't a bug but known pine behavior...
"Error writing scratch file" is a legitimate error when a tmp directory is
filled.
A Pine crash is not.
-- Mark --
http://staff.washington.edu/mrc
Science does not emerge from voting, party politics, or public debate.
From
[email protected] Thu Jan 3 08:44:08 2002 -0800
Return-Path: <
[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 3 Jan 2002 08:44:07 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <
[email protected]>
Received: from mailscan2.cac.washington.edu (mailscan2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.16])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW01.12) with SMTP id g03Gi5V6031536
for <
[email protected]>; Thu, 3 Jan 2002 08:44:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: FROM mx2.cac.washington.edu BY mailscan2.cac.washington.edu ; Thu Jan 03 08:43:24 2002 -0800
Received: from list2.u.washington.edu (list2.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.165])
by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW01.12) with ESMTP id g03GhN11018964;
Thu, 3 Jan 2002 08:43:24 -0800
Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13])
by list2.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.10) with SMTP id g03Gh5415936;
Thu, 3 Jan 2002 08:43:05 -0800
Received: from mailscan1.cac.washington.edu (mailscan1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.16])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.10) with SMTP id g03GgAn32784
for <
[email protected]>; Thu, 3 Jan 2002 08:42:10 -0800
Received: FROM mxu3.u.washington.edu BY mailscan1.cac.washington.edu ; Thu Jan 03 08:42:10 2002 -0800
Received: from pandora.tiscali.nl (pandora.tiscali.nl [195.241.76.179])
by mxu3.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW01.12) with ESMTP id g03Gg9m1001546
for <
[email protected]>; Thu, 3 Jan 2002 08:42:09 -0800
Received: from shell.worldonline.nl (shell.tiscali.nl [195.241.77.35])
by pandora.tiscali.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 9CD8437CD4; Thu, 3 Jan 2002 17:41:33 +0100 (MET)
Received: from localhost (cohenb@localhost)
by shell.worldonline.nl (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.1) with ESMTP id RAA17224;
Thu, 3 Jan 2002 17:41:30 +0100 (MET)
Message-Id: <
[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2002 17:41:30 +0100 (MET)
Sender:
[email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <
http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:
[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:
[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:
[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:
[email protected]>
From: Bruce Cohen <
[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <
[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Your message (no subject found) #011227@15:02:32.1096
In-Reply-To: <
[email protected]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-To: Mark Crispin <
[email protected]>
X-Cc: <
[email protected]>, <
[email protected]>,
<
[email protected]>
X-Authentication-Warning: shell.worldonline.nl: cohenb owned process doing -bs
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN
Status: O
X-Status:
X-Keywords:
X-UID: 10
So why the abort and core dump -any ideas?
You seem to imply that it shouldn't have happened...
Bruce
On Thu, 3 Jan 2002, Mark Crispin wrote:
> On Thu, 3 Jan 2002, Bruce Cohen wrote:
> > I have no idea - how can I tell?
>
> "df /tmp" or "df /var/tmp" will show you how much disk is available on
> /tmp and /var/tmp respectively.
>
> > I take it then that this isn't a bug but known pine behavior...
>
> "Error writing scratch file" is a legitimate error when a tmp directory is
> filled.
>
> A Pine crash is not.
>
> -- Mark --
>
>
http://staff.washington.edu/mrc
> Science does not emerge from voting, party politics, or public debate.
>
>
>
From
[email protected] Thu Jan 3 09:59:59 2002 -0800
Return-Path: <
[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 3 Jan 2002 09:59:58 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <
[email protected]>
Received: from mailscan2.cac.washington.edu (mailscan2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.16])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW01.12) with SMTP id g03HxtV6027582
for <
[email protected]>; Thu, 3 Jan 2002 09:59:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: FROM mx2.cac.washington.edu BY mailscan2.cac.washington.edu ; Thu Jan 03 09:59:53 2002 -0800
Received: from list4.u.washington.edu (list4.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.167])
by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW01.12) with ESMTP id g03Hxq11021398;
Thu, 3 Jan 2002 09:59:53 -0800
Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13])
by list4.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.10) with SMTP id g03Hwlb10118;
Thu, 3 Jan 2002 09:58:47 -0800
Received: from mailscan2.cac.washington.edu (mailscan2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.16])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.10) with SMTP id g03Hvwn84644
for <
[email protected]>; Thu, 3 Jan 2002 09:57:58 -0800
Received: FROM mxu2.u.washington.edu BY mailscan2.cac.washington.edu ; Thu Jan 03 09:57:57 2002 -0800
Received: from Tomobiki-Cho.CAC.Washington.EDU (tomobiki-cho.cac.washington.edu [128.95.135.58])
by mxu2.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW01.12) with ESMTP id g03Hvv3F009029
for <
[email protected]>; Thu, 3 Jan 2002 09:57:57 -0800
Message-Id: <
[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2002 09:56:45 -0800 (PST)
Sender:
[email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <
http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:
[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:
[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:
[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:
[email protected]>
From: Mark Crispin <
[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <
[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Your message (no subject found) #011227@15:02:32.1096
In-Reply-To: <
[email protected]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=US-ASCII
X-Sender: Mark Crispin <
[email protected]>
X-To: Bruce Cohen <
[email protected]>
X-Cc:
[email protected],
[email protected],
[email protected]
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN
Status: O
X-Status:
X-Keywords:
X-UID: 11
On Thu, 3 Jan 2002 17:41:30 +0100 (MET), Bruce Cohen wrote:
> So why the abort and core dump -any ideas?
>
> You seem to imply that it shouldn't have happened...
That's right. An abort/dump should never happen.
As for "why"...do you have a stack trace or any other form of gdb/dbx analysis
of the dump? Many times, problems such as this aren't reproducable here.
From
[email protected] Thu Jan 3 10:30:44 2002 -0800
Return-Path: <
[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 3 Jan 2002 10:30:39 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <
[email protected]>
Received: from mailscan5.cac.washington.edu (mailscan5.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.14])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW01.12) with SMTP id g03IUbV6023660
for <
[email protected]>; Thu, 3 Jan 2002 10:30:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: FROM mx2.cac.washington.edu BY mailscan5.cac.washington.edu ; Thu Jan 03 10:30:35 2002 -0800
Received: from list1.u.washington.edu (list1.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.99])
by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW01.12) with ESMTP id g03IUZ11022407;
Thu, 3 Jan 2002 10:30:35 -0800
Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13])
by list1.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.10) with SMTP id g03IU3513716;
Thu, 3 Jan 2002 10:30:03 -0800
Received: from mailscan3.cac.washington.edu (mailscan3.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.15])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.10) with SMTP id g03ITEn78972
for <
[email protected]>; Thu, 3 Jan 2002 10:29:14 -0800
Received: FROM mxu1.u.washington.edu BY mailscan3.cac.washington.edu ; Thu Jan 03 10:29:13 2002 -0800
Received: from rebecca.tiscali.nl (rebecca.tiscali.nl [195.241.76.181])
by mxu1.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW01.12) with ESMTP id g03ITDTA008692
for <
[email protected]>; Thu, 3 Jan 2002 10:29:13 -0800
Received: from shell.worldonline.nl (shell.tiscali.nl [195.241.77.35])
by rebecca.tiscali.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 87A6E8A3C02; Thu, 3 Jan 2002 19:29:03 +0100 (MET)
Received: from localhost (cohenb@localhost)
by shell.worldonline.nl (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.1) with ESMTP id TAA17641;
Thu, 3 Jan 2002 19:29:04 +0100 (MET)
Message-Id: <
[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2002 19:29:04 +0100 (MET)
Sender:
[email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <
http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:
[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:
[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:
[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:
[email protected]>
From: Bruce Cohen <
[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <
[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Your message (no subject found) #011227@15:02:32.1096
In-Reply-To: <
[email protected]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-To: Mark Crispin <
[email protected]>
X-Cc: <
[email protected]>, <
[email protected]>,
<
[email protected]>
X-Authentication-Warning: shell.worldonline.nl: cohenb owned process doing -bs
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN
Status: O
X-Status:
X-Keywords:
X-UID: 12
No, how do I do that? (I assume it's too late this time)
I could send the core, I still have the last one (all others gone) - it's
slightly over 1 meg, the previous ones were under...
Bruce
On Thu, 3 Jan 2002, Mark Crispin wrote:
> On Thu, 3 Jan 2002 17:41:30 +0100 (MET), Bruce Cohen wrote:
> > So why the abort and core dump -any ideas?
> >
> > You seem to imply that it shouldn't have happened...
>
> That's right. An abort/dump should never happen.
>
> As for "why"...do you have a stack trace or any other form of gdb/dbx analysis
> of the dump? Many times, problems such as this aren't reproducable here.
>
>
>
From
[email protected] Thu Jan 3 10:40:55 2002 -0800
Return-Path: <
[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 3 Jan 2002 10:40:55 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <
[email protected]>
Received: from mailscan3.cac.washington.edu (mailscan3.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.15])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW01.12) with SMTP id g03IerV6008432
for <
[email protected]>; Thu, 3 Jan 2002 10:40:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: FROM mx1.cac.washington.edu BY mailscan3.cac.washington.edu ; Thu Jan 03 10:40:51 2002 -0800
Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100])
by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW01.12) with ESMTP id g03Ieppr019186;
Thu, 3 Jan 2002 10:40:51 -0800
Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13])
by list3.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.10) with SMTP id g03IeW223316;
Thu, 3 Jan 2002 10:40:32 -0800
Received: from mailscan1.cac.washington.edu (mailscan1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.16])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.10) with SMTP id g03Idvn84490
for <
[email protected]>; Thu, 3 Jan 2002 10:39:57 -0800
Received: FROM mxu3.u.washington.edu BY mailscan1.cac.washington.edu ; Thu Jan 03 10:39:56 2002 -0800
Received: from Tomobiki-Cho.CAC.Washington.EDU (tomobiki-cho.cac.washington.edu [128.95.135.58])
by mxu3.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW01.12) with ESMTP id g03Idum1031633
for <
[email protected]>; Thu, 3 Jan 2002 10:39:56 -0800
Message-Id: <
[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2002 10:37:19 -0800 (PST)
Sender:
[email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <
http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:
[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:
[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:
[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:
[email protected]>
From: Mark Crispin <
[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <
[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Your message (no subject found) #011227@15:02:32.1096
In-Reply-To: <
[email protected]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=US-ASCII
X-Sender: Mark Crispin <
[email protected]>
X-To: Bruce Cohen <
[email protected]>
X-Cc:
[email protected],
[email protected],
[email protected]
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN
Status: O
X-Status:
X-Keywords:
X-UID: 13
On Thu, 3 Jan 2002 19:29:04 +0100 (MET), Bruce Cohen wrote:
> No, how do I do that? (I assume it's too late this time)
If you have gdb on your system:
gdb path_of_Pine_binary path_of_core_file
The output from the command command "info stack" is useful as a start. There
may be other things that are also useful.
> I could send the core, I still have the last one (all others gone) - it's
> slightly over 1 meg, the previous ones were under...
Unfortunately, it's useless to mail core files to us unless we have the same
system type and the exact same Pine binary.
From
[email protected] Thu Jan 3 11:32:25 2002 -0800
Return-Path: <
[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 3 Jan 2002 11:32:13 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <
[email protected]>
Received: from mailscan2.cac.washington.edu (mailscan2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.16])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW01.12) with SMTP id g03JWCV6006058
for <
[email protected]>; Thu, 3 Jan 2002 11:32:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: FROM mx1.cac.washington.edu BY mailscan2.cac.washington.edu ; Thu Jan 03 11:32:03 2002 -0800
Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100])
by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW01.12) with ESMTP id g03JW2pr020949;
Thu, 3 Jan 2002 11:32:02 -0800
Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13])
by list3.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.10) with SMTP id g03JVg217450;
Thu, 3 Jan 2002 11:31:42 -0800
Received: from mailscan6.cac.washington.edu (mailscan6.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.14])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.10) with SMTP id g03JUrn81108
for <
[email protected]>; Thu, 3 Jan 2002 11:30:53 -0800
Received: FROM mxu3.u.washington.edu BY mailscan6.cac.washington.edu ; Thu Jan 03 11:30:52 2002 -0800
Received: from mailgate.ias.edu (mailgate.ias.edu [192.16.204.20])
by mxu3.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW01.12) with ESMTP id g03JUgm1012991
for <
[email protected]>; Thu, 3 Jan 2002 11:30:51 -0800
Received: from pico.admin.ias.edu (pico.admin.ias.edu [198.138.242.10])
by mailgate.ias.edu (8.9.3/Pro-8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA29345;
Thu, 3 Jan 2002 14:30:40 -0500 (EST)
Received: by pico.admin.ias.edu with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
id <ZXB5MC6N>; Thu, 3 Jan 2002 14:29:00 -0500
Message-Id: <
[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2002 14:28:50 -0500
Sender:
[email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <
http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:
[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:
[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:
[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:
[email protected]>
From: Hong Tian <
[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <
[email protected]>
Subject: pine.info and pine.conf
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
X-To: Pine Discussion Forum <
[email protected]>
X-Cc: "'
[email protected]'" <
[email protected]>
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN
Status: O
X-Status:
X-Keywords:
X-UID: 14
Hi,
Our Dept. has a Windows 2000 Mail Server. I try to install Pine
on Unix (Solaris 8) workstations. All these Unix users are still
supported by this Windows 2000 Mail Server.
Now I have some questions:
(1) Why can I send email to other users, but I can't receive email
from other users? For a test, I send the email to myself, but I
still can't receive it?
(2) I downloaded the binary codes of pine-bin.sun58 and imapd-bin.sun58.
Where can I find the files of pine.info, pine.conf, and pine.conf.fixed?
Thanks,
Hong
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------
For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see:
http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/
-----------------------------------------------------------------
From
[email protected] Thu Jan 3 13:17:56 2002 -0800
Return-Path: <
[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 3 Jan 2002 13:17:56 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <
[email protected]>
Received: from mailscan4.cac.washington.edu (mailscan4.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.15])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW01.12) with SMTP id g03LHsV6029798
for <
[email protected]>; Thu, 3 Jan 2002 13:17:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: FROM mx1.cac.washington.edu BY mailscan4.cac.washington.edu ; Thu Jan 03 13:17:52 2002 -0800
Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100])
by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW01.12) with ESMTP id g03LHppr024150;
Thu, 3 Jan 2002 13:17:51 -0800
Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13])
by list3.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.10) with SMTP id g03LHO204522;
Thu, 3 Jan 2002 13:17:24 -0800
Received: from mailscan4.cac.washington.edu (mailscan4.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.15])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.10) with SMTP id g03LGZn164092
for <
[email protected]>; Thu, 3 Jan 2002 13:16:36 -0800
Received: FROM mxu4.u.washington.edu BY mailscan4.cac.washington.edu ; Thu Jan 03 13:16:34 2002 -0800
Received: from moultrie.cse.sc.edu ([129.252.138.7])
by mxu4.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW01.12) with ESMTP id g03LGYVK032687
for <
[email protected]>; Thu, 3 Jan 2002 13:16:34 -0800
Received: from mum.cse.sc.edu (mum.cse.sc.edu [129.252.138.21])
by moultrie.cse.sc.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP
id C61431FA24; Thu, 3 Jan 2002 16:16:33 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <
[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2002 16:16:31 -0500 (EST)
Sender:
[email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <
http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:
[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:
[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:
[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:
[email protected]>
From: Gopi Sundaram <
[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <
[email protected]>
Subject: Re: pine.info and pine.conf
In-Reply-To: <
[email protected]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-To: Hong Tian <
[email protected]>
X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum <
[email protected]>
X-X-Sender:
[email protected]
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN
Status: O
X-Status:
X-Keywords:
X-UID: 15
On Thu, 3 Jan 2002, Hong Tian wrote:
> (1) Why can I send email to other users, but I can't receive email
> from other users? For a test, I send the email to myself, but I
> still can't receive it?
What is your inbox set to? My guess is that the default is the local
mail spool file. Since your mail server is the Exchange Server, you
should try to access that via IMAP or POP.
(M)ain (S)etup (C)onfig
inbox-path = {your.exchange.server}
If your user name is different on the Unix boxes than the exchange
server, then change the server definition to
{your.exchange.server/user=xyzzy}
where xyzzy is your login name on the Exchange server.
> Where can I find the files of pine.info, pine.conf, and
> pine.conf.fixed?
pine.conf and pine.conf.fixed contain global options for all users.
pine.conf is overrideable, while pine.conf.fixed is not.
pine.info is optional. It should contain text that tells people to
contact the local support team for help. If it doesn't exist, it won't
harm anything.
For further info on the first two files, take a look at the tech-notes
for Pine configuration:
http://www.washington.edu/pine/tech-notes/config.html
--
Gopi Sundaram
[email protected]
http://www.cse.sc.edu/~gopalan/Pine/
From
[email protected] Thu Jan 3 14:35:08 2002 -0800
Return-Path: <
[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 3 Jan 2002 14:35:07 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <
[email protected]>
Received: from mailscan6.cac.washington.edu (mailscan6.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.14])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW01.12) with SMTP id g03MZ4V6015124
for <
[email protected]>; Thu, 3 Jan 2002 14:35:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: FROM mx1.cac.washington.edu BY mailscan6.cac.washington.edu ; Thu Jan 03 14:35:00 2002 -0800
Received: from list1.u.washington.edu (list1.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.99])
by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW01.12) with ESMTP id g03MZ0pr026409;
Thu, 3 Jan 2002 14:35:00 -0800
Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13])
by list1.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.10) with SMTP id g03MYd524298;
Thu, 3 Jan 2002 14:34:39 -0800
Received: from mailscan4.cac.washington.edu (mailscan4.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.15])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.10) with SMTP id g03MXwn159864
for <
[email protected]>; Thu, 3 Jan 2002 14:33:58 -0800
Received: FROM mxu4.u.washington.edu BY mailscan4.cac.washington.edu ; Thu Jan 03 14:33:57 2002 -0800
Received: from mailgate.ias.edu (mailgate.ias.edu [192.16.204.20])
by mxu4.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW01.12) with ESMTP id g03MXfVK019545
for <
[email protected]>; Thu, 3 Jan 2002 14:33:56 -0800
Received: from pico.admin.ias.edu (pico.admin.ias.edu [198.138.242.10])
by mailgate.ias.edu (8.9.3/Pro-8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA03891;
Thu, 3 Jan 2002 17:33:38 -0500 (EST)
Received: by pico.admin.ias.edu with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
id <ZXB5MDNX>; Thu, 3 Jan 2002 17:31:57 -0500
Message-Id: <
[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2002 17:31:49 -0500
Sender:
[email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <
http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:
[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:
[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:
[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:
[email protected]>
From: Hong Tian <
[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <
[email protected]>
Subject: RE: pine.info and pine.conf
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
X-To: "'Gopi Sundaram'" <
[email protected]>
X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum <
[email protected]>,
"'
[email protected]'"
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN
Status: O
X-Status:
X-Keywords:
X-UID: 16
Gopi,
(1) It works after setting up inbox-path correctly.
(2) After running pine command, a file named .pinerc created
for each user automatically. I can't find pine.info in PINE package.
Should I copy .pinerc to pine.info, or create a new pine.info?
Thanks for your help.
Hong
-----Original Message-----
From: Gopi Sundaram [mailto:
[email protected]]
Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2002 4:17 PM
To: Hong Tian
Cc: Pine Discussion Forum
Subject: Re: pine.info and pine.conf
On Thu, 3 Jan 2002, Hong Tian wrote:
> (1) Why can I send email to other users, but I can't receive email
> from other users? For a test, I send the email to myself, but I
> still can't receive it?
What is your inbox set to? My guess is that the default is the local
mail spool file. Since your mail server is the Exchange Server, you
should try to access that via IMAP or POP.
(M)ain (S)etup (C)onfig
inbox-path = {your.exchange.server}
If your user name is different on the Unix boxes than the exchange
server, then change the server definition to
{your.exchange.server/user=xyzzy}
where xyzzy is your login name on the Exchange server.
> Where can I find the files of pine.info, pine.conf, and
> pine.conf.fixed?
pine.conf and pine.conf.fixed contain global options for all users.
pine.conf is overrideable, while pine.conf.fixed is not.
pine.info is optional. It should contain text that tells people to
contact the local support team for help. If it doesn't exist, it won't
harm anything.
For further info on the first two files, take a look at the tech-notes
for Pine configuration:
http://www.washington.edu/pine/tech-notes/config.html
--
Gopi Sundaram
[email protected]
http://www.cse.sc.edu/~gopalan/Pine/
From
[email protected] Thu Jan 3 15:15:58 2002 -0800
Return-Path: <
[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 3 Jan 2002 15:15:57 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <
[email protected]>
Received: from mailscan1.cac.washington.edu (mailscan1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.16])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW01.12) with SMTP id g03NFuV6031403
for <
[email protected]>; Thu, 3 Jan 2002 15:15:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: FROM mx1.cac.washington.edu BY mailscan1.cac.washington.edu ; Thu Jan 03 15:15:55 2002 -0800
Received: from list4.u.washington.edu (list4.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.167])
by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW01.12) with ESMTP id g03NFspr027562;
Thu, 3 Jan 2002 15:15:54 -0800
Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13])
by list4.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.10) with SMTP id g03NFXb32722;
Thu, 3 Jan 2002 15:15:33 -0800
Received: from mailscan6.cac.washington.edu (mailscan6.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.14])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.10) with SMTP id g03NEgn109866
for <
[email protected]>; Thu, 3 Jan 2002 15:14:42 -0800
Received: FROM mxu3.u.washington.edu BY mailscan6.cac.washington.edu ; Thu Jan 03 15:14:41 2002 -0800
Received: from moultrie.cse.sc.edu ([129.252.138.7])
by mxu3.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW01.12) with ESMTP id g03NEfm1005992
for <
[email protected]>; Thu, 3 Jan 2002 15:14:41 -0800
Received: from mum.cse.sc.edu (mum.cse.sc.edu [129.252.138.21])
by moultrie.cse.sc.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65EA91FA25
for <
[email protected]>; Thu, 3 Jan 2002 18:14:40 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <
[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2002 18:14:40 -0500 (EST)
Sender:
[email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <
http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:
[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:
[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:
[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:
[email protected]>
From: Gopi Sundaram <
[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <
[email protected]>
Subject: RE: pine.info and pine.conf
In-Reply-To: <
[email protected]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-To: Pine Discussion Forum <
[email protected]>
X-X-Sender:
[email protected]
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN
Status: O
X-Status:
X-Keywords:
X-UID: 17
On Thu, 3 Jan 2002, Hong Tian wrote:
> (2) After running pine command, a file named .pinerc created for
> each user automatically.
This is normal. It is the default config file for all users. If you want
to set certain settings that all users will want, such as their inbox
path, you should set that in the pine.conf file. For example, the
pine.conf file for my department looks like this:
smtp-server=smtp.cse.sc.edu
inbox-path={imap.cse.sc.edu/ssl}
nntp-server=news.cse.sc.edu
character-set=iso-8859-1
So for all users, unless they override these settings in their .pinerc
files, these will be the defaults.
The contents of the pine.conf.fixed file are:
rsh-open-timeout=0
Users cannot override this at all in their .pinerc file.
> I can't find pine.info in PINE package. Should I copy .pinerc to
> pine.info, or create a new pine.info?
As I stated before, the file is optional. Read the tech-notes for Pine
to see what it should contain. I gave you a URL in a previous message.
--
Gopi Sundaram
[email protected]
http://www.cse.sc.edu/~gopalan/Pine/
From
[email protected] Thu Jan 3 22:00:14 2002 -0800
Return-Path: <
[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 3 Jan 2002 22:00:14 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <
[email protected]>
Received: from mailscan4.cac.washington.edu (mailscan4.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.15])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW01.12) with SMTP id g0460DV6026287
for <
[email protected]>; Thu, 3 Jan 2002 22:00:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: FROM mx2.cac.washington.edu BY mailscan4.cac.washington.edu ; Thu Jan 03 22:00:07 2002 -0800
Received: from list1.u.washington.edu (list1.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.99])
by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW01.12) with ESMTP id g0460711006787;
Thu, 3 Jan 2002 22:00:07 -0800
Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13])
by list1.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.10) with SMTP id g045xd518804;
Thu, 3 Jan 2002 21:59:40 -0800
Received: from mailscan6.cac.washington.edu (mailscan6.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.14])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.10) with SMTP id g045wKn65452
for <
[email protected]>; Thu, 3 Jan 2002 21:58:20 -0800
Received: FROM mxu3.u.washington.edu BY mailscan6.cac.washington.edu ; Thu Jan 03 21:58:19 2002 -0800
Received: from mailhost.alsc.com (mailhost2.alsc.com [12.7.155.10])
by mxu3.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW01.12) with ESMTP id g045wJm1001661
for <
[email protected]>; Thu, 3 Jan 2002 21:58:19 -0800
Received: (from root@localhost)
by mailhost.alsc.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id VAA07573
for <
[email protected]>; Thu, 3 Jan 2002 21:58:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: from eureka.alsc.com (eureka [210.2.1.11])
by mailhost.alsc.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id VAA07228
for <
[email protected]>; Thu, 3 Jan 2002 21:58:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from everest by eureka.alsc.com (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4)
id LAA29062; Fri, 4 Jan 2002 11:28:56 -0500
Message-Id: <Pine.GSO.4.43.0201041121340.1581-100000@everest>
Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2002 11:23:33 -0500 (GMT)
Reply-To: Arun Prabhakaran <
[email protected]>
Sender:
[email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <
http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:
[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:
[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:
[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:
[email protected]>
From: Arun Prabhakaran <
[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <
[email protected]>
Subject: Re: pine.info and pine.conf
In-Reply-To: <
[email protected]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-Sender:
[email protected]
X-To: Pine Discussion Forum <
[email protected]>
X-message-flag: Get yourself a real mail client!
http://www.washington.edu/pine/
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-AntiVirus: scanned for viruses by AMaViS 0.2.1 (
http://amavis.org/)
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN
Status: O
X-Status:
X-Keywords:
X-UID: 18
hi,
To get pine.conf type:
pine -conf > pine.conf
and u will get a fresh pine.conf file.
for more info try:
pine --help
On Thu, 3 Jan 2002, Hong Tian wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Our Dept. has a Windows 2000 Mail Server. I try to install Pine
> on Unix (Solaris 8) workstations. All these Unix users are still
> supported by this Windows 2000 Mail Server.
>
> Now I have some questions:
>
> (1) Why can I send email to other users, but I can't receive email
> from other users? For a test, I send the email to myself, but I
> still can't receive it?
>
> (2) I downloaded the binary codes of pine-bin.sun58 and imapd-bin.sun58.
> Where can I find the files of pine.info, pine.conf, and pine.conf.fixed?
>
> Thanks,
> Hong
>
>
>
--
From
[email protected] Fri Jan 4 04:09:28 2002 -0800
Return-Path: <
[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Fri, 4 Jan 2002 04:09:28 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <
[email protected]>
Received: from mailscan2.cac.washington.edu (mailscan2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.16])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW01.12) with SMTP id g04BfIV6028584
for <
[email protected]>; Fri, 4 Jan 2002 03:41:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: FROM mx2.cac.washington.edu BY mailscan2.cac.washington.edu ; Fri Jan 04 03:39:16 2002 -0800
Received: from list2.u.washington.edu (list2.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.165])
by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW01.12) with ESMTP id g04BdF11012222;
Fri, 4 Jan 2002 03:39:15 -0800
Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13])
by list2.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.10) with SMTP id g04Bck416756;
Fri, 4 Jan 2002 03:38:46 -0800
Received: from mailscan5.cac.washington.edu (mailscan5.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.14])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.10) with SMTP id g04BbNn22948
for <
[email protected]>; Fri, 4 Jan 2002 03:37:23 -0800
Received: FROM mxu1.u.washington.edu BY mailscan5.cac.washington.edu ; Fri Jan 04 03:37:22 2002 -0800
Received: from lantana.iitm.ernet.in (lantana.tenet.res.in [202.144.28.166])
by mxu1.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW01.12) with ESMTP id g04Bb9TA017275
for <
[email protected]>; Fri, 4 Jan 2002 03:37:20 -0800
Received: from localhost (bharathi@localhost)
by lantana.iitm.ernet.in (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id g04Bb8d26401;
Fri, 4 Jan 2002 17:07:14 +0530
Message-Id: <
[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2002 17:07:08 +0530 (IST)
Sender:
[email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <
http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:
[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:
[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:
[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:
[email protected]>
From: S Bharathi <
[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <
[email protected]>
Subject: Re: i18n Support
In-Reply-To: <
[email protected]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-To: Bob Rasmussen <
[email protected]>
X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum <
[email protected]>
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN
Status: O
X-Status:
X-Keywords:
X-UID: 19
On Wed, 2 Jan 2002, Bob Rasmussen wrote:
> On Wed, 2 Jan 2002, S Bharathi wrote:
> > What is display-filters ? I have no idea about it.
> .pinerc File:
> display-filters=_charset(big5)_ ~/viewutf8 big5,
> _charset(windows-1250)_ ~/viewutf8 windows-1250,
[ snip ]
> Regards,
> ....Bob Rasmussen, President, Rasmussen Software, Inc.
Very Nice Feature. :)
Kindly give your suggestions to proceed my work.
How to apply the modification i doing for P4.33 to New Versions ?
Thank you,
Regards,
Bharathi S.
From
[email protected] Fri Jan 4 09:40:56 2002 -0800
Return-Path: <
[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Fri, 4 Jan 2002 09:40:56 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <
[email protected]>
Received: from mailscan4.cac.washington.edu (mailscan4.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.15])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW01.12) with SMTP id g04HesV6024152
for <
[email protected]>; Fri, 4 Jan 2002 09:40:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: FROM mx2.cac.washington.edu BY mailscan4.cac.washington.edu ; Fri Jan 04 09:40:44 2002 -0800
Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100])
by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW01.12) with ESMTP id g04Heh11019693;
Fri, 4 Jan 2002 09:40:43 -0800
Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13])
by list3.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.10) with SMTP id g04He6218886;
Fri, 4 Jan 2002 09:40:06 -0800
Received: from mailscan6.cac.washington.edu (mailscan6.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.14])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.10) with SMTP id g04HTon118112
for <
[email protected]>; Fri, 4 Jan 2002 09:30:22 -0800
Received: FROM mxu4.u.washington.edu BY mailscan6.cac.washington.edu ; Fri Jan 04 09:29:50 2002 -0800
Received: from mailgate.ias.edu (mailgate.ias.edu [192.16.204.20])
by mxu4.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW01.12) with ESMTP id g04HTmVK004041
for <
[email protected]>; Fri, 4 Jan 2002 09:29:49 -0800
Received: from pico.admin.ias.edu (pico.admin.ias.edu [198.138.242.10])
by mailgate.ias.edu (8.9.3/Pro-8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA20227;
Fri, 4 Jan 2002 12:29:47 -0500 (EST)
Received: by pico.admin.ias.edu with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
id <ZXB5MFCW>; Fri, 4 Jan 2002 12:28:05 -0500
Message-Id: <
[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2002 12:28:04 -0500
Sender:
[email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <
http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:
[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:
[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:
[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:
[email protected]>
From: Hong Tian <
[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <
[email protected]>
Subject: Basic (Clear Text) using SSL
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
X-To: "'Pine Discussion Forum'" <
[email protected]>
X-Cc: "'
[email protected]'" <
[email protected]>
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN
Status: O
X-Status:
X-Keywords:
X-UID: 20
Hi,
I install the pine on Unix (Solaris 8) workstations which
can receive email from our Exchange IMAP Server. But when
I change "IMAP Site Defaults Properties" from "Basic (Clear Text)"
to "Basic (Clear Text) using SSL", the Unix user couldn't login
the Exchange server anymore.
Should I use encryption version of pine to resolve it or are there
other solutions?
Thanks,
Hong
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------
For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see:
http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/
-----------------------------------------------------------------
From
[email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <
[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Fri, 4 Jan 2002 11:34:46 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <
[email protected]>
Received: from mailscan6.cac.washington.edu (mailscan6.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.14])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW01.12) with SMTP id g04JYiV6020962
for <
[email protected]>; Fri, 4 Jan 2002 11:34:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: FROM mx1.cac.washington.edu BY mailscan6.cac.washington.edu ; Fri Jan 04 11:34:33 2002 -0800
Received: from list4.u.washington.edu (list4.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.167])
by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW01.12) with ESMTP id g04JYWpr020035;
Fri, 4 Jan 2002 11:34:33 -0800
Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13])
by list4.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.10) with SMTP id g04JYBb23116;
Fri, 4 Jan 2002 11:34:11 -0800
Received: from mailscan3.cac.washington.edu (mailscan3.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.15])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.10) with SMTP id g04JX9n113862
for <
[email protected]>; Fri, 4 Jan 2002 11:33:09 -0800
Received: FROM mxu1.u.washington.edu BY mailscan3.cac.washington.edu ; Fri Jan 04 11:33:08 2002 -0800
Received: from mailgate.ias.edu (mailgate.ias.edu [192.16.204.20])
by mxu1.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW01.12) with ESMTP id g04JX7TA032219
for <
[email protected]>; Fri, 4 Jan 2002 11:33:07 -0800
Received: from pico.admin.ias.edu (pico.admin.ias.edu [198.138.242.10])
by mailgate.ias.edu (8.9.3/Pro-8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA23132;
Fri, 4 Jan 2002 14:33:06 -0500 (EST)
Received: by pico.admin.ias.edu with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
id <ZXB5MF3B>; Fri, 4 Jan 2002 14:31:23 -0500
Message-Id: <
[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2002 14:31:22 -0500
Sender:
[email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <
http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:
[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:
[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:
[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:
[email protected]>
From: Hong Tian <
[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <
[email protected]>
Subject: Pine & Exchanger with SSL
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
X-To: Pine Discussion Forum <
[email protected]>
X-Cc: "'
[email protected]'" <
[email protected]>
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN
Status: O
X-Status:
X-Keywords:
X-UID: 21
How could Unix Pine clients access Exchange server with SSL?
Thanks.
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------
For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see:
http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/
-----------------------------------------------------------------
From
[email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <
[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Fri, 4 Jan 2002 12:10:57 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <
[email protected]>
Received: from mailscan3.cac.washington.edu (mailscan3.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.15])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW01.12) with SMTP id g04KAtV6024010
for <
[email protected]>; Fri, 4 Jan 2002 12:10:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: FROM mx1.cac.washington.edu BY mailscan3.cac.washington.edu ; Fri Jan 04 12:10:52 2002 -0800
Received: from list1.u.washington.edu (list1.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.99])
by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW01.12) with ESMTP id g04KAppr021192;
Fri, 4 Jan 2002 12:10:51 -0800
Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13])
by list1.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.10) with SMTP id g04KAW527950;
Fri, 4 Jan 2002 12:10:32 -0800
Received: from mailscan6.cac.washington.edu (mailscan6.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.14])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.10) with SMTP id g04K9en72906
for <
[email protected]>; Fri, 4 Jan 2002 12:09:40 -0800
Received: FROM mxu1.u.washington.edu BY mailscan6.cac.washington.edu ; Fri Jan 04 12:09:39 2002 -0800
Received: from moultrie.cse.sc.edu ([129.252.138.7])
by mxu1.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW01.12) with ESMTP id g04K9dTA009466
for <
[email protected]>; Fri, 4 Jan 2002 12:09:39 -0800
Received: from mum.cse.sc.edu (mum.cse.sc.edu [129.252.138.21])
by moultrie.cse.sc.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F7491FA25
for <
[email protected]>; Fri, 4 Jan 2002 15:09:38 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <
[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2002 15:09:38 -0500 (EST)
Sender:
[email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <
http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:
[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:
[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:
[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:
[email protected]>
From: Gopi Sundaram <
[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <
[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Pine & Exchanger with SSL
In-Reply-To: <
[email protected]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-To: Pine Discussion Forum <
[email protected]>
X-X-Sender:
[email protected]
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN
Status: O
X-Status:
X-Keywords:
X-UID: 22
Couldn't you wait two hours for a reply? This is a mailing list spanning
many time zones, and people are under no obligation to answer you
anyway. Have some patience, and lower your expectations. And stop
posting the same question multiple times to the list.
On Fri, 4 Jan 2002, Hong Tian wrote:
> How could Unix Pine clients access Exchange server with SSL?
The server definition should be
your.mail.server/ssl
You may need to add the /pop3 and/or /user= flags as well. If you are
using a self-signed certificate, then you may also have to add the
/novalidate-cert flag.
--
Gopi Sundaram
[email protected]
http://www.cse.sc.edu/~gopalan/Pine/
From
[email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <
[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Fri, 4 Jan 2002 12:17:18 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <
[email protected]>
Received: from mailscan2.cac.washington.edu (mailscan2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.16])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW01.12) with SMTP id g04KHGV6028598
for <
[email protected]>; Fri, 4 Jan 2002 12:17:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: FROM mx1.cac.washington.edu BY mailscan2.cac.washington.edu ; Fri Jan 04 12:17:14 2002 -0800
Received: from list2.u.washington.edu (list2.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.165])
by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW01.12) with ESMTP id g04KHEpr021370;
Fri, 4 Jan 2002 12:17:14 -0800
Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13])
by list2.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.10) with SMTP id g04KGv416822;
Fri, 4 Jan 2002 12:16:58 -0800
Received: from mailscan1.cac.washington.edu (mailscan1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.16])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.10) with SMTP id g04KGFn141380
for <
[email protected]>; Fri, 4 Jan 2002 12:16:15 -0800
Received: FROM mxu1.u.washington.edu BY mailscan1.cac.washington.edu ; Fri Jan 04 12:16:14 2002 -0800
Received: from moultrie.cse.sc.edu ([129.252.138.7])
by mxu1.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW01.12) with ESMTP id g04KGETA011244
for <
[email protected]>; Fri, 4 Jan 2002 12:16:14 -0800
Received: from mum.cse.sc.edu (mum.cse.sc.edu [129.252.138.21])
by moultrie.cse.sc.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1E401FA25
for <
[email protected]>; Fri, 4 Jan 2002 15:16:13 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <
[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2002 15:16:14 -0500 (EST)
Sender:
[email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <
http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:
[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:
[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:
[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:
[email protected]>
From: Gopi Sundaram <
[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <
[email protected]>
Subject: Re: pine.info and pine.conf
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.43.0201041121340.1581-100000@everest>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-To: Pine Discussion Forum <
[email protected]>
X-X-Sender:
[email protected]
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN
Status: O
X-Status:
X-Keywords:
X-UID: 23
On Fri, 4 Jan 2002, Arun Prabhakaran wrote:
> To get pine.conf type:
>
> pine -conf > pine.conf
>
> and u will get a fresh pine.conf file.
Yes, but the output of pine.conf is overkill. There is a whole bunch of
empty definitions which could be left out, and other unnecessary verbage
totalling about 16kB. With just the options I need it it for my site,
the pine.conf file is 195 bytes.
Pine needs to parse these files at startup. Why slow it down?
--
Gopi Sundaram
[email protected]
http://www.cse.sc.edu/~gopalan/Pine/
From
[email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <
[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Fri, 4 Jan 2002 12:30:24 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <
[email protected]>
Received: from mailscan2.cac.washington.edu (mailscan2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.16])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW01.12) with SMTP id g04KUNV6001416
for <
[email protected]>; Fri, 4 Jan 2002 12:30:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: FROM mx2.cac.washington.edu BY mailscan2.cac.washington.edu ; Fri Jan 04 12:30:21 2002 -0800
Received: from list1.u.washington.edu (list1.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.99])
by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW01.12) with ESMTP id g04KUL11024881;
Fri, 4 Jan 2002 12:30:21 -0800
Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13])
by list1.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.10) with SMTP id g04KU0528028;
Fri, 4 Jan 2002 12:30:00 -0800
Received: from mailscan3.cac.washington.edu (mailscan3.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.15])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.10) with SMTP id g04KTZn65626
for <
[email protected]>; Fri, 4 Jan 2002 12:29:35 -0800
Received: FROM mxu1.u.washington.edu BY mailscan3.cac.washington.edu ; Fri Jan 04 12:29:34 2002 -0800
Received: from euler.math.washington.edu (euler.math.washington.edu [128.95.224.1])
by mxu1.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW01.12) with ESMTP id g04KTYTA014472
for <
[email protected]>; Fri, 4 Jan 2002 12:29:34 -0800
Received: from goedel2.math.washington.edu (goedel2.math.washington.edu [128.95.224.11])
by euler.math.washington.edu (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g04KTXK382937;
Fri, 4 Jan 2002 12:29:33 -0800 (PST)
Message-Id: <Pine.OSF.4.43.0201041227300.47559-100000@goedel2.math.washington.edu>
Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2002 12:29:33 -0800 (PST)
Sender:
[email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <
http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:
[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:
[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:
[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:
[email protected]>
From: Eduardo Chappa <
[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <
[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Pine & Exchanger with SSL
In-Reply-To: <
[email protected]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-To: Gopi Sundaram <
[email protected]>
X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum <
[email protected]>
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN
Status: O
X-Status:
X-Keywords:
X-UID: 24
*** Gopi Sundaram (
[email protected]) wrote in the pine-info list today:
:) Couldn't you wait two hours for a reply? This is a mailing list
:) spanning many time zones, and people are under no obligation to answer
:) you anyway. Have some patience, and lower your expectations. And stop
:) posting the same question multiple times to the list.
Dear Gopi,
Can you send this type of comment (that is to say, something that makes
you angry which is not related to Pine) in personal e-mail rather than
send it to the list?, I personally dislike to read them.
Thank you for your consideration
--
Eduardo
http://www.math.washington.edu/~chappa/pine/
From
[email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <
[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Fri, 4 Jan 2002 12:40:23 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <
[email protected]>
Received: from mailscan4.cac.washington.edu (mailscan4.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.15])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW01.12) with SMTP id g04KeLV6013908
for <
[email protected]>; Fri, 4 Jan 2002 12:40:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: FROM mx1.cac.washington.edu BY mailscan4.cac.washington.edu ; Fri Jan 04 12:40:13 2002 -0800
Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100])
by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW01.12) with ESMTP id g04KeCpr022103;
Fri, 4 Jan 2002 12:40:12 -0800
Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13])
by list3.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.10) with SMTP id g04Kdr204794;
Fri, 4 Jan 2002 12:39:54 -0800
Received: from mailscan6.cac.washington.edu (mailscan6.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.14])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.10) with SMTP id g04KdJn131420
for <
[email protected]>; Fri, 4 Jan 2002 12:39:19 -0800
Received: FROM mxu3.u.washington.edu BY mailscan6.cac.washington.edu ; Fri Jan 04 12:39:18 2002 -0800
Received: from InterGate.southcoast.net (intergate.southcoast.net [206.245.213.2])
by mxu3.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW01.12) with ESMTP id g04KdHm1001657
for <
[email protected]>; Fri, 4 Jan 2002 12:39:17 -0800
Received: from [206.245.213.119] (sub119.southcoast.net [206.245.213.119])
by InterGate.southcoast.net (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id MAA29718
for <
[email protected]>; Fri, 4 Jan 2002 12:49:30 -0800 (PST)
Message-Id: <v04210101b85bc2565b91@[206.245.213.119]>
Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2002 12:36:34 -0800
Sender:
[email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <
http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:
[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:
[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:
[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:
[email protected]>
From: John Wolf <
[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <
[email protected]>
Subject: PINE for Windows
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed"
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN
Status: O
X-Status:
X-Keywords:
X-UID: 25
Hello;
I am new to this list. I am a former user of Pine. I am anxious to
no if any of you knows about whether or not a Pine for Windows or
WindowsCe exists? I rather enjoyed the speed and functionality of
Pine. Its something current versions of popular email programs are
lacking.
Any help will beappreciated.
Jonn
___________________________________________________________________
Visit my new Three Stooges page
http://www.southcoast.net/johnw/stooges
John 6:35
Then Jesus declared, "I am the bread of life. He who comes to me will
never go hungry, and he who believes in me will never be thirsty.
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------
For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see:
http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/
-----------------------------------------------------------------
From
[email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <
[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Fri, 4 Jan 2002 21:11:16 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <
[email protected]>
Received: from mailscan5.cac.washington.edu (mailscan5.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.14])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW01.12) with SMTP id g055BEV6017689
for <
[email protected]>; Fri, 4 Jan 2002 21:11:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: FROM mx2.cac.washington.edu BY mailscan5.cac.washington.edu ; Fri Jan 04 21:11:13 2002 -0800
Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100])
by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW01.12) with ESMTP id g055BD11004299;
Fri, 4 Jan 2002 21:11:13 -0800
Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13])
by list3.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.10) with SMTP id g055Ak228996;
Fri, 4 Jan 2002 21:10:46 -0800
Received: from mailscan2.cac.washington.edu (mailscan2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.16])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.10) with SMTP id g0559tn54314
for <
[email protected]>; Fri, 4 Jan 2002 21:09:55 -0800
Received: FROM mxu1.u.washington.edu BY mailscan2.cac.washington.edu ; Fri Jan 04 21:09:54 2002 -0800
Received: from smtp6.andrew.cmu.edu (SMTP6.ANDREW.CMU.EDU [128.2.10.86])
by mxu1.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW01.12) with ESMTP id g0559sTA011000
for <
[email protected]>; Fri, 4 Jan 2002 21:09:54 -0800
Received: from pooh (DYN-77-216.WV.CC.CMU.EDU [128.2.77.216])
by smtp6.andrew.cmu.edu (8.12.2.Beta3/8.12.2.Beta3) with ESMTP id g0559q4k026148
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NO)
for <
[email protected]>; Sat, 5 Jan 2002 00:09:52 -0500
Message-Id: <Pine.WNT.4.43.0201042354090.2440-100000@pooh>
Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2002 00:09:52 -0500 (Eastern Standard Time)
Sender:
[email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <
http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:
[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:
[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:
[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:
[email protected]>
From: Shan-leung Maverick WOO <
[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <
[email protected]>
Subject: PCPine's font script suggestion
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-X-Sender:
[email protected]
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN
Status: O
X-Status:
X-Keywords:
X-UID: 26
Hello,
I believe PCPine's pinerc does not store the script setting in the font
selection dialog (Config->Set Window Font). May I suggest this be fixed in
the future if that is the case? This setting is important in Windows (2000
and later) because it allows PCPine to use display non-English messages
with the correct font installed.
Without persistence, the font script has to be set manually every time
Pine launches. But if the Normal font color is not one of the 16 standard
colors shown in the dialog, then it will be changed. This is undesirable
because then the color has to be changed manually in the color setup...
I realize this may be a rare case as well as windows specific, but please
consider storing the font script in pinerc in the future. Thanks!
--
All the best,
Maverick Woo
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------
For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see:
http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/
-----------------------------------------------------------------
From
[email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <
[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Sat, 5 Jan 2002 03:24:11 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <
[email protected]>
Received: from mailscan6.cac.washington.edu (mailscan6.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.14])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW01.12) with SMTP id g05BNSV6018227
for <
[email protected]>; Sat, 5 Jan 2002 03:23:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: FROM mx2.cac.washington.edu BY mailscan6.cac.washington.edu ; Sat Jan 05 03:00:18 2002 -0800
Received: from list2.u.washington.edu (list2.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.165])
by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW01.12) with ESMTP id g05B0I11009764;
Sat, 5 Jan 2002 03:00:18 -0800
Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13])
by list2.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.10) with SMTP id g05Axe420754;
Sat, 5 Jan 2002 02:59:40 -0800
Received: from mailscan6.cac.washington.edu (mailscan6.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.14])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.10) with SMTP id g05Aw7n167352
for <
[email protected]>; Sat, 5 Jan 2002 02:58:07 -0800
Received: FROM mxu2.u.washington.edu BY mailscan6.cac.washington.edu ; Sat Jan 05 02:58:04 2002 -0800
Received: from msgdirector2.onetel.net.uk (msgdirector2.onetel.net.uk [212.67.96.149])
by mxu2.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW01.12) with ESMTP id g05Aw33F011567
for <
[email protected]>; Sat, 5 Jan 2002 02:58:03 -0800
Received: from 213-78-42-165.friaco.onetel.net.uk (213-78-42-165.friaco.onetel.net.uk [213.78.42.165])
by msgdirector2.onetel.net.uk (Mirapoint)
with ESMTP id ACL18297;
Sat, 5 Jan 2002 10:57:54 GMT
Message-Id: <Pine.WNT.4.43.0201051101510.-3853309-100000@no>
Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2002 11:06:29 +0000 (GMT)
Sender:
[email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <
http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:
[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:
[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:
[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:
[email protected]>
From: Nancy McGough <
[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <
[email protected]>
Subject: Re: PINE for Windows
In-Reply-To: <v04210101b85bc2565b91@[206.245.213.119]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-To: Pine Discussion Forum <
[email protected]>
X-Message-Flag: Worried about Outlook viruses? Switch to Mac/Unix/PC Pine! Info @ www.ii.com
X-X-Sender:
[email protected]
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN
Status: O
X-Status:
X-Keywords:
X-UID: 27
On 4 Jan 2002 John Wolf (
[email protected]) wrote:
> I am a former user of Pine. I am anxious to
> no if any of you knows about whether or not a Pine for Windows or
> WindowsCe exists? I rather enjoyed the speed and functionality of
> Pine. Its something current versions of popular email programs are
> lacking.
Pine exists for MS Windows but afaik it doesn't exist for WinCE.
I have exhaustive instructions for setting up PC-Pine for Power
users here
<
http://www.ii.com/internet/messaging/pine/pc/>
I've just updated so it now includes some info about the euro
sign and a lot more...
Hope you like PC-Pine's speed and functionality!
Nancy
^x
--
ii Main Pine Page: <
http://www.ii.com/internet/messaging/pine/>
Nancy McGough <
http://www.ii.com/> Infinite Ink
--= Sent via Pine 4.43: IMAP, NNTP & ESMTP for Unix/Win/MacOS X =--
From
[email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <
[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Sat, 5 Jan 2002 11:29:38 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <
[email protected]>
Received: from mailscan2.cac.washington.edu (mailscan2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.16])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW01.12) with SMTP id g05JTaV6002763
for <
[email protected]>; Sat, 5 Jan 2002 11:29:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: FROM mx2.cac.washington.edu BY mailscan2.cac.washington.edu ; Sat Jan 05 11:29:32 2002 -0800
Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100])
by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW01.12) with ESMTP id g05JTV11017655;
Sat, 5 Jan 2002 11:29:31 -0800
Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13])
by list3.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.10) with SMTP id g05JSs220982;
Sat, 5 Jan 2002 11:28:55 -0800
Received: from mailscan2.cac.washington.edu (mailscan2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.16])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.10) with SMTP id g05JRvn54384
for <
[email protected]>; Sat, 5 Jan 2002 11:27:57 -0800
Received: FROM mxu1.u.washington.edu BY mailscan2.cac.washington.edu ; Sat Jan 05 11:27:56 2002 -0800
Received: from InterGate.southcoast.net (intergate.southcoast.net [206.245.213.2])
by mxu1.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW01.12) with ESMTP id g05JRuTA030575
for <
[email protected]>; Sat, 5 Jan 2002 11:27:56 -0800
Received: from [206.245.213.118] (sub118.southcoast.net [206.245.213.118])
by InterGate.southcoast.net (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id LAA19320;
Sat, 5 Jan 2002 11:38:06 -0800 (PST)
Message-Id: <v04210101b85d0377a258@[206.245.213.118]>
Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2002 11:25:04 -0800
Sender:
[email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <
http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:
[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:
[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:
[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:
[email protected]>
From: John Wolf <
[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <
[email protected]>
Subject: Re: PINE for Windows
In-Reply-To: <Pine.WNT.4.43.0201051101510.-3853309-100000@no>
References: <Pine.WNT.4.43.0201051101510.-3853309-100000@no>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed"
X-To: Nancy McGough <
[email protected]>
X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum <
[email protected]>
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN
Status: O
X-Status:
X-Keywords:
X-UID: 28
Thanks I will give it a shot.
John
At 11:06 AM +0000 1/5/02, Nancy McGough wrote:
>On 4 Jan 2002 John Wolf (
[email protected]) wrote:
>> I am a former user of Pine. I am anxious to
>> no if any of you knows about whether or not a Pine for Windows or
>> WindowsCe exists? I rather enjoyed the speed and functionality of
>> Pine. Its something current versions of popular email programs are
>> lacking.
>
>Pine exists for MS Windows but afaik it doesn't exist for WinCE.
>I have exhaustive instructions for setting up PC-Pine for Power
>users here
>
> <
http://www.ii.com/internet/messaging/pine/pc/>
>
>I've just updated so it now includes some info about the euro
>sign and a lot more...
>
>Hope you like PC-Pine's speed and functionality!
>Nancy
>^x
>
>
>--
>ii Main Pine Page: <
http://www.ii.com/internet/messaging/pine/>
>
>Nancy McGough <
http://www.ii.com/> Infinite Ink
>--= Sent via Pine 4.43: IMAP, NNTP & ESMTP for Unix/Win/MacOS X =--
___________________________________________________________________
Visit my new Three Stooges page
http://www.southcoast.net/johnw/stooges
John 6:35
Then Jesus declared, "I am the bread of life. He who comes to me will
never go hungry, and he who believes in me will never be thirsty.
From
[email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <
[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Sat, 5 Jan 2002 11:44:05 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <
[email protected]>
Received: from mailscan5.cac.washington.edu (mailscan5.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.14])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW01.12) with SMTP id g05Ji3V6023879
for <
[email protected]>; Sat, 5 Jan 2002 11:44:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: FROM mx1.cac.washington.edu BY mailscan5.cac.washington.edu ; Sat Jan 05 11:43:56 2002 -0800
Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100])
by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW01.12) with ESMTP id g05Jhtpr015099;
Sat, 5 Jan 2002 11:43:55 -0800
Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13])
by list3.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.10) with SMTP id g05Jhb233406;
Sat, 5 Jan 2002 11:43:37 -0800
Received: from mailscan6.cac.washington.edu (mailscan6.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.14])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.10) with SMTP id g05Jgmn78286
for <
[email protected]>; Sat, 5 Jan 2002 11:42:48 -0800
Received: FROM mxu3.u.washington.edu BY mailscan6.cac.washington.edu ; Sat Jan 05 11:42:48 2002 -0800
Received: from mail.vo.com ([208.36.81.99])
by mxu3.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW01.12) with ESMTP id g05Jgkm1016079
for <
[email protected]>; Sat, 5 Jan 2002 11:42:47 -0800
Received: from gandolph.ASGARD.jms (alexhome2 [66.108.152.69])
by mail.vo.com (8.12.1/8.12.1) with ESMTP id g05Jgimq000744
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NO)
for <
[email protected]>; Sat, 5 Jan 2002 14:42:45 -0500
Message-Id: <
[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2002 14:44:14 -0500 (Eastern Standard Time)
Sender:
[email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <
http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:
[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:
[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:
[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:
[email protected]>
From: "S. Alexander Jacobson" <
[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <
[email protected]>
Subject: html messages
In-Reply-To: <
[email protected]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-To: Pine Discussion Forum <
[email protected]>
X-X-Sender:
[email protected]
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN
Status: O
X-Status:
X-Keywords:
X-UID: 29
PC-Pine does not appear to render html
messages correctly unless they have a charset.
So this works:
content-type: text/html; charset="ascii"
But this doesn't:
content-type: text/html
Any fix?
-Alex-
___________________________________________________________________
S. Alexander Jacobson i2x Media
1-212-787-1814 voice 1-603-288-1280 fax
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------
For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see:
http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/
-----------------------------------------------------------------
From
[email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <
[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Sun, 6 Jan 2002 04:53:13 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <
[email protected]>
Received: from mailscan4.cac.washington.edu (mailscan4.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.15])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW01.12) with SMTP id g06CrCV6030624
for <
[email protected]>; Sun, 6 Jan 2002 04:53:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: FROM mx1.cac.washington.edu BY mailscan4.cac.washington.edu ; Sun Jan 06 04:53:05 2002 -0800
Received: from list2.u.washington.edu (list2.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.165])
by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW01.12) with ESMTP id g06Cr5pr030910;
Sun, 6 Jan 2002 04:53:05 -0800
Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13])
by list2.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.10) with SMTP id g06CqS422424;
Sun, 6 Jan 2002 04:52:28 -0800
Received: from mailscan2.cac.washington.edu (mailscan2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.16])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.10) with SMTP id g06Cosn59654
for <
[email protected]>; Sun, 6 Jan 2002 04:50:54 -0800
Received: FROM mxu4.u.washington.edu BY mailscan2.cac.washington.edu ; Sun Jan 06 04:50:54 2002 -0800
Received: from msgdirector2.onetel.net.uk (msgdirector2.onetel.net.uk [212.67.96.149])
by mxu4.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW01.12) with ESMTP id g06CorVK010869
for <
[email protected]>; Sun, 6 Jan 2002 04:50:53 -0800
Received: from 213-78-19-49.friaco.onetel.net.uk (213-78-19-49.friaco.onetel.net.uk [213.78.19.49])
by msgdirector2.onetel.net.uk (Mirapoint)
with ESMTP id ACM15207;
Sun, 6 Jan 2002 12:50:32 GMT
Message-Id: <Pine.WNT.4.43.0201061255550.-4142255-100000@no>
Date: Sun, 6 Jan 2002 12:59:19 +0000 (GMT)
Sender:
[email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <
http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:
[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:
[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:
[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:
[email protected]>
From: Nancy McGough <
[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <
[email protected]>
Subject: selectable-item-nobold???
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-To: Pine Technical Discussion Forum <
[email protected]>
X-Message-Flag: Worried about Outlook viruses? Switch to Mac/Unix/PC Pine! Info @ www.ii.com
X-X-Sender:
[email protected]
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN
Status: O
X-Status:
X-Keywords:
X-UID: 30
I'm having some weirdnesses with bolding so I looked in my pinerc
to try to figure out what was going on. I discovered this in my
feature-list
selectable-item-nobold
What is this feature and why is it not available in the Pine
Config screen and not mentioned anywhere on the PIC?
Thanks,
Nancy
^x
--
ii Main Pine Page: <
http://www.ii.com/internet/messaging/pine/>
Nancy McGough <
http://www.ii.com/> Infinite Ink
--= Sent via Pine 4.43: IMAP, NNTP & ESMTP for Unix/Win/MacOS X =--
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------
For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see:
http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/
-----------------------------------------------------------------
From
[email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <
[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Mon, 7 Jan 2002 04:29:25 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <
[email protected]>
Received: from mailscan2.cac.washington.edu (mailscan2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.16])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW01.12) with SMTP id g07CTNV6024763
for <
[email protected]>; Mon, 7 Jan 2002 04:29:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: FROM mx2.cac.washington.edu BY mailscan2.cac.washington.edu ; Mon Jan 07 04:29:22 2002 -0800
Received: from list1.u.washington.edu (list1.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.99])
by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW01.12) with ESMTP id g07CTL11023595;
Mon, 7 Jan 2002 04:29:21 -0800
Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13])
by list1.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.10) with SMTP id g07CSf517058;
Mon, 7 Jan 2002 04:28:41 -0800
Received: from mailscan4.cac.washington.edu (mailscan4.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.15])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.10) with SMTP id g07CInn45918
for <
[email protected]>; Mon, 7 Jan 2002 04:18:49 -0800
Received: FROM mxu4.u.washington.edu BY mailscan4.cac.washington.edu ; Mon Jan 07 04:18:45 2002 -0800
Received: from jpunix.com (cs2416751-113.houston.rr.com [24.167.51.113])
by mxu4.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW01.12) with ESMTP id g07CIiVK031305
for <
[email protected]>; Mon, 7 Jan 2002 04:18:45 -0800
Received: from localhost (perry@localhost)
by jpunix.com (8.11.6/linuxconf) with ESMTP id g07CIcW13760
for <
[email protected]>; Mon, 7 Jan 2002 06:18:38 -0600
Message-Id: <
[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2002 06:18:22 -0600 (CST)
Sender:
[email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <
http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:
[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:
[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:
[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:
[email protected]>
From: John Perry <
[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <
[email protected]>
Subject: Sig file not working in roles?
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-To: Pine Mailing List <
[email protected]>
X-URL:
http://www.jpunix.com
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN
Status: O
X-Status:
X-Keywords:
X-UID: 31
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hello Everyone,
I was playing with setting up an alternate role when I post news.
I went to the signature location line, typed in the full path to the sig
file I wanted, but it shows blank in the composer. Literal sigs work fine.
I checked and double-checked to no avail. I'm running 4.43. Any thoughts?
- --
John Perry
[email protected] PGP-encrypted e-mail welcome!
http://www.jpunix.com
PGP/GPG key 164BDBAE
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: pgpenvelope 2.10.1 -
http://pgpenvelope.sourceforge.net/
iD8DBQE8OZIb7YSEAxZL264RApebAJ9XLbSMK1+TAV84oV7sUrTbF5N3ZgCg3BSa
L2ECMQvZLImjM8pXgkUE6i8=
=a3xS
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------
For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see:
http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/
-----------------------------------------------------------------
From
[email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <
[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Mon, 7 Jan 2002 21:51:55 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <
[email protected]>
Received: from mailscan3.cac.washington.edu (mailscan3.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.15])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW01.12) with SMTP id g085prV6000151
for <
[email protected]>; Mon, 7 Jan 2002 21:51:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: FROM mx2.cac.washington.edu BY mailscan3.cac.washington.edu ; Mon Jan 07 21:51:52 2002 -0800
Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100])
by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW01.12) with ESMTP id g085pq11018515;
Mon, 7 Jan 2002 21:51:52 -0800
Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13])
by list3.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.10) with SMTP id g085pK208442;
Mon, 7 Jan 2002 21:51:21 -0800
Received: from mailscan6.cac.washington.edu (mailscan6.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.14])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.10) with SMTP id g085o6n39068
for <
[email protected]>; Mon, 7 Jan 2002 21:50:06 -0800
Received: FROM mxu3.u.washington.edu BY mailscan6.cac.washington.edu ; Mon Jan 07 21:50:05 2002 -0800
Received: from nimbus.anzio.com ([66.129.212.98])
by mxu3.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW01.12) with ESMTP id g085o4m1022332
for <
[email protected]>; Mon, 7 Jan 2002 21:50:05 -0800
Received: from localhost (ras@localhost)
by nimbus.anzio.com (8.11.2/8.11.0) with ESMTP id g085agg17976;
Mon, 7 Jan 2002 21:36:47 -0800
Message-Id: <
[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2002 21:36:42 -0800 (PST)
Sender:
[email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <
http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:
[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:
[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:
[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:
[email protected]>
From: Bob Rasmussen <
[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <
[email protected]>
Subject: Re: i18n Support
In-Reply-To: <
[email protected]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-To: S Bharathi <
[email protected]>
X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum <
[email protected]>
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN
Status: O
X-Status:
X-Keywords:
X-UID: 32
On Fri, 4 Jan 2002, S Bharathi wrote:
> On Wed, 2 Jan 2002, Bob Rasmussen wrote:
> > On Wed, 2 Jan 2002, S Bharathi wrote:
>
> > > What is display-filters ? I have no idea about it.
> > .pinerc File:
>
> > display-filters=_charset(big5)_ ~/viewutf8 big5,
> > _charset(windows-1250)_ ~/viewutf8 windows-1250,
> [ snip ]
>
> > Regards,
> > ....Bob Rasmussen, President, Rasmussen Software, Inc.
>
> Very Nice Feature. :)
>
> Kindly give your suggestions to proceed my work.
> How to apply the modification i doing for P4.33 to New Versions ?
There are some automated ways of comparing files ("diff") and merging the
changes into a new file, that will work IF there are not changes in the newly
released versions in the same area. My own approach is just to comment my
changes in such a way that I can grep for them, and then reapply them
manually.
Regards,
...Bob Rasmussen, President, Rasmussen Software, Inc.
personal e-mail:
[email protected]
company e-mail:
[email protected]
voice: (US) 503-624-0360 (9:00-6:00 Pacific Time)
fax: (US) 503-624-0760
web:
http://www.anzio.com
From
[email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <
[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Tue, 8 Jan 2002 01:30:39 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <
[email protected]>
Received: from mailscan3.cac.washington.edu (mailscan3.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.15])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW01.12) with SMTP id g089UbV6019910
for <
[email protected]>; Tue, 8 Jan 2002 01:30:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: FROM mx2.cac.washington.edu BY mailscan3.cac.washington.edu ; Tue Jan 08 01:30:30 2002 -0800
Received: from list1.u.washington.edu (list1.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.99])
by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW01.12) with ESMTP id g089UU11022307;
Tue, 8 Jan 2002 01:30:30 -0800
Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13])
by list1.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.10) with SMTP id g089Tr534094;
Tue, 8 Jan 2002 01:29:53 -0800
Received: from mailscan6.cac.washington.edu (mailscan6.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.14])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.10) with SMTP id g089Sdn175346
for <
[email protected]>; Tue, 8 Jan 2002 01:28:39 -0800
Received: FROM mxu1.u.washington.edu BY mailscan6.cac.washington.edu ; Tue Jan 08 01:28:35 2002 -0800
Received: from wiberg.nu (as3-6-5.asp.s.bonet.se [217.215.37.155])
by mxu1.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW01.12) with SMTP id g089SXTA011730
for <
[email protected]>; Tue, 8 Jan 2002 01:28:34 -0800
Received: (qmail 32917 invoked by uid 1000); 8 Jan 2002 09:28:25 -0000
Message-Id: <
[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2002 10:28:25 +0100
Sender:
[email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <
http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:
[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:
[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:
[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:
[email protected]>
From: Daniel Wiberg <
[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <
[email protected]>
Subject: Folders overview
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN
Status: O
X-Status:
X-Keywords:
X-UID: 33
Hi Pineusers!
Is there a way to get a reasonable overview of which mailfolders contains new
email, and get Pine to report new mail in all (or some chosen) mailfolders?
I saw an e-mail about this in the list back in nov -99 but that was never answered.....
BR,
Daniel Wiberg
--
www.wiberg.nu
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------
For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see:
http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/
-----------------------------------------------------------------
From
[email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <
[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Tue, 8 Jan 2002 06:35:55 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <
[email protected]>
Received: from mailscan6.cac.washington.edu (mailscan6.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.14])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW01.12) with SMTP id g08EZsV6029629
for <
[email protected]>; Tue, 8 Jan 2002 06:35:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: FROM mx1.cac.washington.edu BY mailscan6.cac.washington.edu ; Tue Jan 08 06:35:50 2002 -0800
Received: from list1.u.washington.edu (list1.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.99])
by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW01.12) with ESMTP id g08EZnpr026006;
Tue, 8 Jan 2002 06:35:50 -0800
Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13])
by list1.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.10) with SMTP id g08EZM571148;
Tue, 8 Jan 2002 06:35:22 -0800
Received: from mailscan5.cac.washington.edu (mailscan5.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.14])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.10) with SMTP id g08EY3n70482
for <
[email protected]>; Tue, 8 Jan 2002 06:34:03 -0800
Received: FROM mxu3.u.washington.edu BY mailscan5.cac.washington.edu ; Tue Jan 08 06:34:03 2002 -0800
Received: from server1.shellworld.net (server1.shellworld.net [64.39.15.178])
by mxu3.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW01.12) with ESMTP id g08EY2m1016910
for <
[email protected]>; Tue, 8 Jan 2002 06:34:02 -0800
Received: from localhost (fairall@localhost)
by server1.shellworld.net (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id g08EY1168791
for <
[email protected]>; Tue, 8 Jan 2002 08:34:01 -0600 (CST)
(envelope-from
[email protected])
Message-Id: <
[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2002 09:34:01 -0500 (EST)
Sender:
[email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <
http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:
[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:
[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:
[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:
[email protected]>
From: Leslie Fairall <
[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <
[email protected]>
Subject: Sending Multiple Attachments
In-Reply-To: <
[email protected]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum <
[email protected]>
X-X-Sender:
[email protected]
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN
Status: O
X-Status:
X-Keywords:
X-UID: 34
Is there an easy way to send multiple attachments with Unix pine without
typing in all of the names of the files? When you press control-t, is
there a way to select multiple filenames instead of going back to the
composition screen and having to hit control-t and s multiple times.
Thanks.
From
[email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <
[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Tue, 8 Jan 2002 06:47:13 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <
[email protected]>
Received: from mailscan5.cac.washington.edu (mailscan5.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.14])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW01.12) with SMTP id g08ElCV6031077
for <
[email protected]>; Tue, 8 Jan 2002 06:47:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: FROM mx1.cac.washington.edu BY mailscan5.cac.washington.edu ; Tue Jan 08 06:47:10 2002 -0800
Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100])
by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW01.12) with ESMTP id g08El9pr026251;
Tue, 8 Jan 2002 06:47:10 -0800
Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13])
by list3.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.10) with SMTP id g08Ekm234536;
Tue, 8 Jan 2002 06:46:48 -0800
Received: from mailscan3.cac.washington.edu (mailscan3.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.15])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.10) with SMTP id g08Ejun175168
for <
[email protected]>; Tue, 8 Jan 2002 06:45:58 -0800
Received: FROM mxu2.u.washington.edu BY mailscan3.cac.washington.edu ; Tue Jan 08 06:45:56 2002 -0800
Received: from mail.sonytel.be (mail.sonytel.be [193.74.243.200])
by mxu2.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW01.12) with ESMTP id g08Ejp3F008990
for <
[email protected]>; Tue, 8 Jan 2002 06:45:54 -0800
Received: from cactus.sonytel.be (mail.sonytel.be [10.17.0.27])
by mail.sonytel.be (8.9.0/8.8.6) with ESMTP id PAA18645
for <
[email protected]>; Tue, 8 Jan 2002 15:45:48 +0100 (MET)
Received: from localhost (piotr@localhost)
by cactus.sonytel.be (8.10.2+Sun/8.9.3) with ESMTP id g08EjlJ18656
for <
[email protected]>; Tue, 8 Jan 2002 15:45:47 +0100 (MET)
Message-Id: <
[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2002 15:45:47 +0100 (MET)
Sender:
[email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <
http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:
[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:
[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:
[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:
[email protected]>
From: Murphy <
[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <
[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Sending Multiple Attachments
In-Reply-To: <
[email protected]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-To: NEWS - Pine Discussion Forum <
[email protected]>
X-Authentication-Warning: cactus.sonytel.be: piotr owned process doing -bs
X-X-Sender:
[email protected]
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN
Status: O
X-Status:
X-Keywords:
X-UID: 35
>Is there an easy way to send multiple attachments with Unix pine without
>typing in all of the names of the files? When you press control-t, is
>there a way to select multiple filenames instead of going back to the
>composition screen and having to hit control-t and s multiple times.
My simply solution is:
1) open pine in the right directory
2) type from the oter terminal in this directory:
for i in `/bin/ls` ; do echo -n "$i, "; done
3) copy the output of this command into the "Attachment" field (without
the last coma)
That's it.
But it would by nice to have a choice to select more tan one attachment
from the file browser like it is for example in the addressbook when we
select more than one address at the time.
Regards,
Murhy
--
__ __
|| ||
-++- -++- --------------------------------------------------------
||\ /|| e-mail:
[email protected] GG 107745
|| || Everything is possible - this is only a question of time
\/564\/ --------------------------------------------------------
From
[email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <
[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Tue, 8 Jan 2002 07:27:50 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <
[email protected]>
Received: from mailscan4.cac.washington.edu (mailscan4.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.15])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW01.12) with SMTP id g08FRnV6028831
for <
[email protected]>; Tue, 8 Jan 2002 07:27:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: FROM mx1.cac.washington.edu BY mailscan4.cac.washington.edu ; Tue Jan 08 07:27:48 2002 -0800
Received: from list2.u.washington.edu (list2.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.165])
by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW01.12) with ESMTP id g08FRlpr027011;
Tue, 8 Jan 2002 07:27:47 -0800
Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13])
by list2.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.10) with SMTP id g08FRB423772;
Tue, 8 Jan 2002 07:27:11 -0800
Received: from mailscan2.cac.washington.edu (mailscan2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.16])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.10) with SMTP id g08FQdn38522
for <
[email protected]>; Tue, 8 Jan 2002 07:26:39 -0800
Received: FROM mxu1.u.washington.edu BY mailscan2.cac.washington.edu ; Tue Jan 08 07:26:35 2002 -0800
Received: from moultrie.cse.sc.edu ([129.252.138.7])
by mxu1.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW01.12) with ESMTP id g08FQZTA015733
for <
[email protected]>; Tue, 8 Jan 2002 07:26:35 -0800
Received: from mum.cse.sc.edu (mum.cse.sc.edu [129.252.138.21])
by moultrie.cse.sc.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B7CC1FA25
for <
[email protected]>; Tue, 8 Jan 2002 10:26:34 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <
[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2002 10:26:34 -0500 (EST)
Sender:
[email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <
http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:
[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:
[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:
[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:
[email protected]>
From: Gopi Sundaram <
[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <
[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Folders overview
In-Reply-To: <
[email protected]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-To: Pine Discussion Forum <
[email protected]>
X-X-Sender:
[email protected]
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN
Status: O
X-Status:
X-Keywords:
X-UID: 36
On Tue, 8 Jan 2002, Daniel Wiberg wrote:
> Is there a way to get a reasonable overview of which mailfolders
> contains new email, and get Pine to report new mail in all (or some
> chosen) mailfolders?
FAQ.
http://www.cse.sc.edu/~gopalan/Pine/other.html#filtermail
--
Gopi Sundaram
[email protected]
http://www.cse.sc.edu/~gopalan/Pine/
From
[email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <
[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Tue, 8 Jan 2002 13:34:12 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <
[email protected]>
Received: from mailscan6.cac.washington.edu (mailscan6.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.14])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW01.12) with SMTP id g08LY8V6031246
for <
[email protected]>; Tue, 8 Jan 2002 13:34:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: FROM mx1.cac.washington.edu BY mailscan6.cac.washington.edu ; Tue Jan 08 13:34:01 2002 -0800
Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100])
by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW01.12) with ESMTP id g08LY0pr006350;
Tue, 8 Jan 2002 13:34:00 -0800
Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13])
by list3.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.10) with SMTP id g08LXT215072;
Tue, 8 Jan 2002 13:33:29 -0800
Received: from mailscan4.cac.washington.edu (mailscan4.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.15])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.10) with SMTP id g08LVxn161506
for <
[email protected]>; Tue, 8 Jan 2002 13:31:59 -0800
Received: FROM mxu1.u.washington.edu BY mailscan4.cac.washington.edu ; Tue Jan 08 13:31:58 2002 -0800
Received: from mailscan2.cac.washington.edu (mailscan2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.16])
by mxu1.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW01.12) with SMTP id g08LVwTA027173
for <
[email protected]>; Tue, 8 Jan 2002 13:31:58 -0800
Received: FROM mx2.cac.washington.edu BY mailscan2.cac.washington.edu ; Tue Jan 08 13:31:57 2002 -0800
Received: from mxout2.cac.washington.edu (mxout2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.4])
by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW01.12) with ESMTP id g08LVv11007462
for <
[email protected]>; Tue, 8 Jan 2002 13:31:57 -0800
Received: from smtp.washington.edu (smtp.washington.edu [140.142.32.12])
by mxout2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW01.12) with ESMTP id g08LVvQX015311
for <
[email protected]>; Tue, 8 Jan 2002 13:31:57 -0800
Received: from [128.95.135.163] (D-128-95-135-163.dhcp.washington.edu [128.95.135.163])
(authenticated bits=0)
by smtp.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW01.12) with ESMTP id g08LVvkg022718
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NO)
for <
[email protected]>; Tue, 8 Jan 2002 13:31:57 -0800
Message-Id: <Pine.WNT.4.50.0201081329490.1292-100000@hubertw2k2_ndc.nebula.washington.edu>
Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2002 13:31:57 -0800 (Pacific Standard Time)
Sender:
[email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <
http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:
[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:
[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:
[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:
[email protected]>
From: Steve Hubert <
[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <
[email protected]>
Subject: Re: selectable-item-nobold???
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-To: Pine News Group <
[email protected]>
X-X-Sender:
[email protected]
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN
Status: O
X-Status:
X-Keywords:
X-UID: 37
This feature is not controlled from the Setup/Config screen. If you go to
Setup/Kolor and look at Selectable-item Color, you will see that you can
have the selected item be bold or not. The feature selectable-item-nobold
is where pine stores this configuration information.
--
Steve Hubert <
[email protected]>
Networks and Distributed Computing, Univ. of Washington, Seattle
On Sun, 6 Jan 2002, Nancy McGough wrote:
> I'm having some weirdnesses with bolding so I looked in my pinerc
> to try to figure out what was going on. I discovered this in my
> feature-list
>
> selectable-item-nobold
>
> What is this feature and why is it not available in the Pine
> Config screen and not mentioned anywhere on the PIC?
>
> Thanks,
> Nancy
> ^x
From
[email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <
[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Tue, 8 Jan 2002 14:42:44 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <
[email protected]>
Received: from mailscan3.cac.washington.edu (mailscan3.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.15])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW01.12) with SMTP id g08MgfV6019568
for <
[email protected]>; Tue, 8 Jan 2002 14:42:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: FROM mx1.cac.washington.edu BY mailscan3.cac.washington.edu ; Tue Jan 08 14:42:40 2002 -0800
Received: from list2.u.washington.edu (list2.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.165])
by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW01.12) with ESMTP id g08Mgdpr008549;
Tue, 8 Jan 2002 14:42:39 -0800
Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13])
by list2.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.10) with SMTP id g08Mfl405240;
Tue, 8 Jan 2002 14:41:47 -0800
Received: from mailscan6.cac.washington.edu (mailscan6.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.14])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.10) with SMTP id g08MPUn31014
for <
[email protected]>; Tue, 8 Jan 2002 14:25:30 -0800
Received: FROM mxu3.u.washington.edu BY mailscan6.cac.washington.edu ; Tue Jan 08 14:25:30 2002 -0800
Received: from mail.vo.com ([208.36.81.99])
by mxu3.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW01.12) with ESMTP id g08MPTm1016701
for <
[email protected]>; Tue, 8 Jan 2002 14:25:29 -0800
Received: from gandolph.ASGARD.jms (alexhome2 [66.108.152.69])
by mail.vo.com (8.12.1/8.12.1) with ESMTP id g08MPRmq032752
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NO)
for <
[email protected]>; Tue, 8 Jan 2002 17:25:28 -0500
Message-Id: <
[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2002 17:27:01 -0500 (Eastern Standard Time)
Sender:
[email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <
http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:
[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:
[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:
[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:
[email protected]>
From: "S. Alexander Jacobson" <
[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <
[email protected]>
Subject: compose delay
In-Reply-To: <Pine.WNT.4.50.0201081329490.1292-100000@hubertw2k2_ndc.nebula.washington.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-To: Pine Discussion Forum <
[email protected]>
X-X-Sender:
[email protected]
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN
Status: O
X-Status:
X-Keywords:
X-UID: 38
Whenever I choose to compose a new message and not
continue composing a suspended message, I
experience a very high latency before I am allowed
to start writing. Any idea why?
I am using PCPIne 4.43 with SSL
-Alex-
___________________________________________________________________
S. Alexander Jacobson i2x Media
1-212-787-1914 voice 1-603-288-1280 fax
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------
For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see:
http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/
-----------------------------------------------------------------
From
[email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <
[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Tue, 8 Jan 2002 14:49:43 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <
[email protected]>
Received: from mailscan4.cac.washington.edu (mailscan4.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.15])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW01.12) with SMTP id g08MnfV6014250
for <
[email protected]>; Tue, 8 Jan 2002 14:49:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: FROM mx1.cac.washington.edu BY mailscan4.cac.washington.edu ; Tue Jan 08 14:49:39 2002 -0800
Received: from list1.u.washington.edu (list1.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.99])
by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW01.12) with ESMTP id g08Mncpr008782;
Tue, 8 Jan 2002 14:49:38 -0800
Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13])
by list1.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.10) with SMTP id g08MnJ527376;
Tue, 8 Jan 2002 14:49:19 -0800
Received: from mailscan4.cac.washington.edu (mailscan4.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.15])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.10) with SMTP id g08Mmdn91946
for <
[email protected]>; Tue, 8 Jan 2002 14:48:39 -0800
Received: FROM mxu1.u.washington.edu BY mailscan4.cac.washington.edu ; Tue Jan 08 14:48:38 2002 -0800
Received: from mxout2.cac.washington.edu (mxout2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.4])
by mxu1.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW01.12) with ESMTP id g08MmcTA018122
for <
[email protected]>; Tue, 8 Jan 2002 14:48:38 -0800
Received: from smtp.washington.edu (smtp.washington.edu [140.142.32.12])
by mxout2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW01.12) with ESMTP id g08MmcQX031491;
Tue, 8 Jan 2002 14:48:38 -0800
Received: from [128.95.135.163] (D-128-95-135-163.dhcp.washington.edu [128.95.135.163])
(authenticated bits=0)
by smtp.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW01.12) with ESMTP id g08Mmbkg023556
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NO);
Tue, 8 Jan 2002 14:48:38 -0800
Message-Id: <Pine.WNT.4.50.0201081332160.1292-100000@hubertw2k2_ndc.nebula.washington.edu>
Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2002 14:48:37 -0800 (Pacific Standard Time)
Sender:
[email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <
http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:
[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:
[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:
[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:
[email protected]>
From: Steve Hubert <
[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <
[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Color support under FreeBSD
In-Reply-To: <
[email protected]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-To: Kim Scarborough <
[email protected]>
X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum <
[email protected]>
X-X-Sender:
[email protected]
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN
Status: O
X-Status:
X-Keywords:
X-UID: 39
The messed up display happens because your terminal emulator scrolls when
a character is written to the bottom right hand character cell. Pine
writes in that cell if you have the KeyLabel color set in order to color
the background. We used to not write that last cell and several people
complained that the color in the lower right hand corner was incorrect,
which it was.
You can fix it by turning of KeyLabel Color. You might be able to fix it
by adjusting a setting in your terminal emulator so that it doesn't scroll
when the last character on the screen is written. Or you can fix it by
editing screen.c the way you have, which should cause the wrong color
character in the lower-right corner of the screen.
--
Steve Hubert <
[email protected]>
Networks and Distributed Computing, Univ. of Washington, Seattle
On Wed, 2 Jan 2002, Kim Scarborough wrote:
> A little late piping up in this thread, sorry...
>
> > With color support turned on (no matter which one of the three options
> > that are available is selected), the screen gets pretty much messed up. All
> > lines seem to get redrawn exactly one line below their original position.
> > As a result of that, the entries in pine's menues get displayed twice, and
> > that just looks kind of strange.
>
> I've been complaining about this bug since 4.20. Somebody sent me a patch
> for it and said he submitted it, but it was never committed. I don't
> want to be a pest, but I have to apply that patch with each new version.
> Is there a way to find out what's going on with this?
>
> By the way, the fix is to change line 210 in pine/screen.c from
> "if(i == 1 && !label_color)" to
> "if(i == 1)".
>
> I've lost the name of the fellow who sent it to me, unfortunately...
> hopefully he's still on this list.
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Kim Scarborough
http://www.unknown.nu/kim/
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From
[email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <
[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Tue, 8 Jan 2002 14:52:47 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <
[email protected]>
Received: from mailscan4.cac.washington.edu (mailscan4.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.15])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW01.12) with SMTP id g08MqhV6002350
for <
[email protected]>; Tue, 8 Jan 2002 14:52:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: FROM mx1.cac.washington.edu BY mailscan4.cac.washington.edu ; Tue Jan 08 14:52:42 2002 -0800
Received: from list4.u.washington.edu (list4.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.167])
by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW01.12) with ESMTP id g08Mqfpr008864;
Tue, 8 Jan 2002 14:52:41 -0800
Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13])
by list4.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.10) with SMTP id g08MqOb25828;
Tue, 8 Jan 2002 14:52:24 -0800
Received: from mailscan6.cac.washington.edu (mailscan6.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.14])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.10) with SMTP id g08MpYn45184
for <
[email protected]>; Tue, 8 Jan 2002 14:51:34 -0800
Received: FROM mxu2.u.washington.edu BY mailscan6.cac.washington.edu ; Tue Jan 08 14:51:33 2002 -0800
Received: from mxout2.cac.washington.edu (mxout2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.4])
by mxu2.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW01.12) with ESMTP id g08MpX3F014239
for <
[email protected]>; Tue, 8 Jan 2002 14:51:33 -0800
Received: from smtp.washington.edu (smtp.washington.edu [140.142.33.9])
by mxout2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW01.12) with ESMTP id g08MpUQX032179;
Tue, 8 Jan 2002 14:51:30 -0800
Received: from [128.95.135.163] (D-128-95-135-163.dhcp.washington.edu [128.95.135.163])
(authenticated bits=0)
by smtp.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW01.12) with ESMTP id g08MpUvb018621
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NO);
Tue, 8 Jan 2002 14:51:30 -0800
Message-Id: <Pine.WNT.4.50.0201081450140.1292-100000@hubertw2k2_ndc.nebula.washington.edu>
Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2002 14:51:29 -0800 (Pacific Standard Time)
Sender:
[email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <
http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:
[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:
[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:
[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:
[email protected]>
From: Steve Hubert <
[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <
[email protected]>
Subject: Re: compose delay
In-Reply-To: <
[email protected]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-To: "S. Alexander Jacobson" <
[email protected]>
X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum <
[email protected]>
X-X-Sender:
[email protected]
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN
Status: O
X-Status:
X-Keywords:
X-UID: 40
Try running pine with command line flags
pine -dverbose=9,timestamp,imap=4
and then look for the delay in the debug file. This should give you a clue
about where the delay is happening.
--
Steve Hubert <
[email protected]>
Networks and Distributed Computing, Univ. of Washington, Seattle
On Tue, 8 Jan 2002, S. Alexander Jacobson wrote:
> Whenever I choose to compose a new message and not
> continue composing a suspended message, I
> experience a very high latency before I am allowed
> to start writing. Any idea why?
>
> I am using PCPIne 4.43 with SSL
>
> -Alex-
>
> ___________________________________________________________________
> S. Alexander Jacobson i2x Media
> 1-212-787-1914 voice 1-603-288-1280 fax
From
[email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <
[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Tue, 8 Jan 2002 15:04:58 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <
[email protected]>
Received: from mailscan3.cac.washington.edu (mailscan3.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.15])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW01.12) with SMTP id g08N4qV6009393
for <
[email protected]>; Tue, 8 Jan 2002 15:04:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: FROM mx1.cac.washington.edu BY mailscan3.cac.washington.edu ; Tue Jan 08 15:04:51 2002 -0800
Received: from list1.u.washington.edu (list1.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.99])
by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW01.12) with ESMTP id g08N4ppr009316;
Tue, 8 Jan 2002 15:04:51 -0800
Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13])
by list1.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.10) with SMTP id g08N4Q524438;
Tue, 8 Jan 2002 15:04:26 -0800
Received: from mailscan1.cac.washington.edu (mailscan1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.16])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.10) with SMTP id g08N3Xn58996
for <
[email protected]>; Tue, 8 Jan 2002 15:03:34 -0800
Received: FROM mxu2.u.washington.edu BY mailscan1.cac.washington.edu ; Tue Jan 08 15:03:33 2002 -0800
Received: from mail.vo.com ([208.36.81.99])
by mxu2.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW01.12) with ESMTP id g08N3W3F017727
for <
[email protected]>; Tue, 8 Jan 2002 15:03:33 -0800
Received: from gandolph.ASGARD.jms (alexhome2 [66.108.152.69])
by mail.vo.com (8.12.1/8.12.1) with ESMTP id g08N3Tmq008941
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NO);
Tue, 8 Jan 2002 18:03:30 -0500
Message-Id: <
[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2002 18:05:03 -0500 (Eastern Standard Time)
Sender:
[email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <
http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:
[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:
[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:
[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:
[email protected]>
From: "S. Alexander Jacobson" <
[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <
[email protected]>
Subject: Re: compose delay
In-Reply-To: <Pine.WNT.4.50.0201081450140.1292-100000@hubertw2k2_ndc.nebula.washington.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-To: Steve Hubert <
[email protected]>
X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum <
[email protected]>
X-X-Sender:
[email protected]
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN
Status: O
X-Status:
X-Keywords:
X-UID: 41
Ok, I did that. It appears to want to download my
entire suspended messages folder before asking me
whether I want to continue with a suspended
message.
Is there a way to make it download my suspended
message folder only after I say Yes to wanting to
continue with a suspended message?
-Alex-
On Tue, 8 Jan 2002, Steve Hubert wrote:
> Try running pine with command line flags
>
> pine -dverbose=9,timestamp,imap=4
>
> and then look for the delay in the debug file. This should give you a clue
> about where the delay is happening.
>
> --
> Steve Hubert <
[email protected]>
> Networks and Distributed Computing, Univ. of Washington, Seattle
>
> On Tue, 8 Jan 2002, S. Alexander Jacobson wrote:
>
> > Whenever I choose to compose a new message and not
> > continue composing a suspended message, I
> > experience a very high latency before I am allowed
> > to start writing. Any idea why?
> >
> > I am using PCPIne 4.43 with SSL
> >
> > -Alex-
> >
> > ___________________________________________________________________
> > S. Alexander Jacobson i2x Media
> > 1-212-787-1914 voice 1-603-288-1280 fax
>
>
___________________________________________________________________
S. Alexander Jacobson i2x Media
1-212-787-1914 voice 1-603-288-1280 fax
From
[email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <
[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Tue, 8 Jan 2002 15:09:00 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <
[email protected]>
Received: from mailscan1.cac.washington.edu (mailscan1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.16])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW01.12) with SMTP id g08N8wV6027844
for <
[email protected]>; Tue, 8 Jan 2002 15:08:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: FROM mx1.cac.washington.edu BY mailscan1.cac.washington.edu ; Tue Jan 08 15:08:56 2002 -0800
Received: from list2.u.washington.edu (list2.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.165])
by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW01.12) with ESMTP id g08N8upr009462;
Tue, 8 Jan 2002 15:08:56 -0800
Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13])
by list2.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.10) with SMTP id g08N8d414512;
Tue, 8 Jan 2002 15:08:39 -0800
Received: from mailscan1.cac.washington.edu (mailscan1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.16])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.10) with SMTP id g08N7un11432
for <
[email protected]>; Tue, 8 Jan 2002 15:07:56 -0800
Received: FROM mxu4.u.washington.edu BY mailscan1.cac.washington.edu ; Tue Jan 08 15:07:55 2002 -0800
Received: from mxout2.cac.washington.edu (mxout2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.4])
by mxu4.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW01.12) with ESMTP id g08N7tVK013675
for <
[email protected]>; Tue, 8 Jan 2002 15:07:55 -0800
Received: from smtp.washington.edu (smtp.washington.edu [140.142.32.12])
by mxout2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW01.12) with ESMTP id g08N7qQX003293;
Tue, 8 Jan 2002 15:07:52 -0800
Received: from shiva1.cac.washington.edu (shiva1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.100.201])
(authenticated bits=0)
by smtp.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW01.12) with ESMTP id g08N7qkg023754
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO);
Tue, 8 Jan 2002 15:07:52 -0800
Message-Id: <Pine.LNX.4.50.0201081506560.16400-100000@shiva1.cac.washington.edu>
Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2002 15:07:52 -0800 (PST)
Sender:
[email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <
http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:
[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:
[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:
[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:
[email protected]>
From: Steve Hubert <
[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <
[email protected]>
Subject: Re: compose delay
In-Reply-To: <
[email protected]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-To: "S. Alexander Jacobson" <
[email protected]>
X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum <
[email protected]>
X-X-Sender:
[email protected]
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN
Status: O
X-Status:
X-Keywords:
X-UID: 42
You could set the feature 'alternate-compose-menu'.
From
[email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <
[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Wed, 9 Jan 2002 16:25:01 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <
[email protected]>
Received: from mailscan6.cac.washington.edu (mailscan6.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.14])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW01.12) with SMTP id g0A0OxV6014804
for <
[email protected]>; Wed, 9 Jan 2002 16:25:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: FROM mx1.cac.washington.edu BY mailscan6.cac.washington.edu ; Wed Jan 09 16:24:58 2002 -0800
Received: from list1.u.washington.edu (list1.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.99])
by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW01.12) with ESMTP id g0A0Owpr013338;
Wed, 9 Jan 2002 16:24:58 -0800
Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13])
by list1.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.10) with SMTP id g0A0NM545540;
Wed, 9 Jan 2002 16:23:23 -0800
Received: from mailscan5.cac.washington.edu (mailscan5.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.14])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.10) with SMTP id g0A0J1n172482
for <
[email protected]>; Wed, 9 Jan 2002 16:19:02 -0800
Received: FROM mxu1.u.washington.edu BY mailscan5.cac.washington.edu ; Wed Jan 09 16:19:01 2002 -0800
Received: from mailscan3.cac.washington.edu (mailscan3.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.15])
by mxu1.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW01.12) with SMTP id g0A0J1TA032179
for <
[email protected]>; Wed, 9 Jan 2002 16:19:01 -0800
Received: FROM mx1.cac.washington.edu BY mailscan3.cac.washington.edu ; Wed Jan 09 16:19:00 2002 -0800
Received: from list1.u.washington.edu (list1.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.99])
by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW01.12) with ESMTP id g0A0Igpr013176;
Wed, 9 Jan 2002 16:18:42 -0800
Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13])
by list1.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.10) with SMTP id g0A0IV508178;
Wed, 9 Jan 2002 16:18:31 -0800
Received: from mailscan5.cac.washington.edu (mailscan5.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.14])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.10) with SMTP id g09Nobn119920
for <
[email protected]>; Wed, 9 Jan 2002 15:50:37 -0800
Received: FROM mxu2.u.washington.edu BY mailscan5.cac.washington.edu ; Wed Jan 09 15:50:36 2002 -0800
Received: from mxout2.cac.washington.edu (mxout2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.4])
by mxu2.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW01.12) with ESMTP id g09Noa3F006943
for <
[email protected]>; Wed, 9 Jan 2002 15:50:36 -0800
Received: from smtp.washington.edu (smtp.washington.edu [140.142.32.12])
by mxout2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW01.12) with ESMTP id g09NoaQX004621
for <
[email protected]>; Wed, 9 Jan 2002 15:50:36 -0800
Received: from [128.95.135.163] (D-128-95-135-163.dhcp.washington.edu [128.95.135.163])
(authenticated bits=0)
by smtp.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW01.12) with ESMTP id g09NoZkg007530
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NO)
for <
[email protected]>; Wed, 9 Jan 2002 15:50:36 -0800
Message-Id: <Pine.WNT.4.50.0201091458380.1532-100000@hubertw2k2_ndc.nebula.washington.edu>
Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2002 15:50:31 -0800 (Pacific Standard Time)
Sender:
[email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <
http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:
[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:
[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:
[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:
[email protected]>
From: Steve Hubert <
[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <
[email protected]>
Subject: Pine 4.44 now available
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-Sender:
[email protected]
X-To: Pine Announcement List <
[email protected]>
X-X-Sender:
[email protected]
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN
Status: O
X-Status:
X-Keywords:
X-UID: 43
This note is to announce the availability of the Pine Message System
version 4.44. The purpose of this release is to fix a security
bug with the treatment of quotes in the URL-handling code. The bug
allows a malicious sender to embed commands in a URL. This bug is
present in all versions of UNIX Pine. There is no vulnerability from
this bug in PC-Pine.
The release notes are available from within Pine ("R" command off the
Main Menu) and via
http://www.washington.edu/pine/changes.html
and
ftp://ftp.cac.washington.edu/pine/docs/
Source for the latest Pine release is available in:
ftp://ftp.cac.washington.edu/pine/pine.tar.Z
and
ftp://ftp.cac.washington.edu/pine/pine.tar.gz
Precompiled binaries for the various systems we have direct access to
are available in:
ftp://ftp.cac.washington.edu/pine/unix-bin
and
ftp://ftp.cac.washington.edu/pine/unix-bin-compressed
The corresponding PC-Pine distribution is available in:
ftp://ftp.cac.washington.edu/pine/pcpine/pm444w32.zip
As with all Pine releases, it is important that you carefully test and
determine for yourself that it performs suitably in your environment
before placing Pine into production use.
The Pine Development Team
--
-------------------------------------------------------------
For information about this mailing list, see:
http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/pine-announce.html
-------------------------------------------------------------
--
-------------------------------------------------------------
For information about this mailing list, see:
http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/pine-announce.html
-------------------------------------------------------------
From
[email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <
[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Wed, 9 Jan 2002 16:36:15 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <
[email protected]>
Received: from mailscan2.cac.washington.edu (mailscan2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.16])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW01.12) with SMTP id g0A0a6V6001116
for <
[email protected]>; Wed, 9 Jan 2002 16:36:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: FROM mx2.cac.washington.edu BY mailscan2.cac.washington.edu ; Wed Jan 09 16:36:04 2002 -0800
Received: from list4.u.washington.edu (list4.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.167])
by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW01.12) with ESMTP id g0A0a411014133;
Wed, 9 Jan 2002 16:36:04 -0800
Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13])
by list4.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.10) with SMTP id g0A0Zab20126;
Wed, 9 Jan 2002 16:35:36 -0800
Received: from mailscan1.cac.washington.edu (mailscan1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.16])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.10) with SMTP id g0A0SJn05108
for <
[email protected]>; Wed, 9 Jan 2002 16:28:19 -0800
Received: FROM mxu3.u.washington.edu BY mailscan1.cac.washington.edu ; Wed Jan 09 16:28:18 2002 -0800
Received: from mail1.panix.com (mail1.panix.com [166.84.0.212])
by mxu3.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW01.12) with ESMTP id g0A0SHm1000891
for <
[email protected]>; Wed, 9 Jan 2002 16:28:17 -0800
Received: from [192.168.1.100] (localhost.panix.com [127.0.0.1])
by mail1.panix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6970B4876E
for <
[email protected]>; Wed, 9 Jan 2002 19:28:16 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <
[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2002 16:28:14 -0800 (PST)
Sender:
[email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <
http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:
[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:
[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:
[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:
[email protected]>
From: Kenneth Crudup <
[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <
[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Pine 4.44 now available
In-Reply-To: <Pine.WNT.4.50.0201091458380.1532-100000@hubertw2k2_ndc.nebula.washington.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum <
[email protected]>
X-X-Sender:
[email protected]
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN
Status: O
X-Status:
X-Keywords:
X-UID: 44
On Wed, 9 Jan 2002, Steve Hubert wrote:
> The purpose of this release is to fix a security
> bug with the treatment of quotes in the URL-handling code. The bug
> allows a malicious sender to embed commands in a URL. This bug is
> present in all versions of UNIX Pine. There is no vulnerability from
> this bug in PC-Pine.
Can you explain? The URL I get is passed to a script that changes commas
into "%2D"s then runs that past nutscrape. I can't see how someone could
get into my box that way.
-Kenny
--
Kenneth R. Crudup Sr. SW Engineer, Scott County Consulting, Washington, D.C.
Home1: PO Box 914 Silver Spring, MD 20910-0914
[email protected]
Home2: 38010 Village Cmn. #217 Fremont, CA 94536-7525 (510) 745-0101
From
[email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <
[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Wed, 9 Jan 2002 20:00:29 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <
[email protected]>
Received: from mailscan3.cac.washington.edu (mailscan3.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.15])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW01.12) with SMTP id g0A40OV6018440
for <
[email protected]>; Wed, 9 Jan 2002 20:00:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: FROM mx1.cac.washington.edu BY mailscan3.cac.washington.edu ; Wed Jan 09 20:00:21 2002 -0800
Received: from list2.u.washington.edu (list2.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.165])
by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW01.12) with ESMTP id g0A40Lpr017900;
Wed, 9 Jan 2002 20:00:21 -0800
Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13])
by list2.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.10) with SMTP id g0A3xp420458;
Wed, 9 Jan 2002 19:59:52 -0800
Received: from mailscan1.cac.washington.edu (mailscan1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.16])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.10) with SMTP id g0A3vOn155646
for <
[email protected]>; Wed, 9 Jan 2002 19:57:24 -0800
Received: FROM mxu1.u.washington.edu BY mailscan1.cac.washington.edu ; Wed Jan 09 19:57:23 2002 -0800
Received: from euler.math.washington.edu (euler.math.washington.edu [128.95.224.1])
by mxu1.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW01.12) with ESMTP id g0A3vNTA011539
for <
[email protected]>; Wed, 9 Jan 2002 19:57:23 -0800
Received: from goedel3.math.washington.edu (goedel3.math.washington.edu [128.95.224.12])
by euler.math.washington.edu (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g0A3vMK164495;
Wed, 9 Jan 2002 19:57:22 -0800 (PST)
Message-Id: <Pine.OSF.4.33.0201091950550.303285-100000@goedel3.math.washington.edu>
Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2002 19:57:21 -0800 (PST)
Sender:
[email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <
http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:
[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:
[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:
[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:
[email protected]>
From: Eduardo Chappa <
[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <
[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Pine 4.44 now available
In-Reply-To: <
[email protected]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-To: Kenneth Crudup <
[email protected]>
X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum <
[email protected]>
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN
Status: O
X-Status:
X-Keywords:
X-UID: 45
*** Kenneth Crudup (
[email protected]) wrote today:
> On Wed, 9 Jan 2002, Steve Hubert wrote:
>
> > The purpose of this release is to fix a security
> > bug with the treatment of quotes in the URL-handling code. The bug
> > allows a malicious sender to embed commands in a URL. This bug is
> > present in all versions of UNIX Pine. There is no vulnerability from
> > this bug in PC-Pine.
>
> Can you explain? The URL I get is passed to a script that changes
> commas into "%2D"s then runs that past nutscrape. I can't see how
> someone could get into my box that way.
>
Read the following thread in Bugtraq:
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=bugtraq/Pine.LNX.4.33.0201051514170.25654-100000%40clarity.local
I am still unable to reproduce what it says there, even when I copied and
pasted the html code, and created an html e-mail with it. I don't see the
exploit. It may be shell or system dependent, but I can confidently say
that no one can exploit this ``bug'' in my system.
--
Eduardo
http://www.math.washington.edu/~chappa/pine/
From
[email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <
[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Wed, 9 Jan 2002 21:19:45 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <
[email protected]>
Received: from mailscan2.cac.washington.edu (mailscan2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.16])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW01.12) with SMTP id g0A5JgV6014809
for <
[email protected]>; Wed, 9 Jan 2002 21:19:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: FROM mx2.cac.washington.edu BY mailscan2.cac.washington.edu ; Wed Jan 09 21:19:35 2002 -0800
Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100])
by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW01.12) with ESMTP id g0A5JZ11019727;
Wed, 9 Jan 2002 21:19:35 -0800
Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13])
by list3.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.10) with SMTP id g0A4xBx05494;
Wed, 9 Jan 2002 20:59:11 -0800
Received: from mailscan2.cac.washington.edu (mailscan2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.16])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.10) with SMTP id g0A4uXn158690
for <
[email protected]>; Wed, 9 Jan 2002 20:56:34 -0800
Received: FROM mxu2.u.washington.edu BY mailscan2.cac.washington.edu ; Wed Jan 09 20:56:32 2002 -0800
Received: from hotmail.com (f70.pav1.hotmail.com [64.4.31.70])
by mxu2.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW01.12) with ESMTP id g0A4uV3F031874
for <
[email protected]>; Wed, 9 Jan 2002 20:56:31 -0800
Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC;
Wed, 9 Jan 2002 20:56:31 -0800
Received: from 147.11.36.25 by pv1fd.pav1.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP;
Thu, 10 Jan 2002 04:56:31 GMT
Message-Id: <
[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2002 04:56:31 +0000
Sender:
[email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <
http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:
[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:
[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:
[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:
[email protected]>
From: "Pierre Rocher" <
[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <
[email protected]>
Subject: TAB does not detect new messages in incoming folders
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed
X-Originating-IP: [147.11.36.25]
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 10 Jan 2002 04:56:31.0429 (UTC) FILETIME=[2BA0DF50:01C19993]
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN
Status: O
X-Status:
X-Keywords:
X-UID: 46
Hi,
I don't seem to find answers to the following from the archive. Can
someone help?
1. I recently added my own filter rules (using 4.43) so that matching
messages will be moved to one of the Incoming Message Collection folders. In
INBOX index, hitting TAB when cursor is at the last message, it loops thru
the folders "Checking XXX for recent messages" and eventually "No more
incoming folders" is displayed. However, it does not flag or display
messages with new or important flag in any of the folders there. If the
folder is opened then hit TAB, then TAB works for messages in the current
folder. (note this is not the same issue of enable-circular-tab Eduardo has
a patch for.) Tried on Solaris 2.5.1 and 2.7 and 2.8. This makes it pain to
get new messages by opening each. (I'm filtering to about 20 folders!) It
sounds like this is working for some ppl. Whats the trick?
(my primary inbox is pop3, while the other folders in the incoming msg
collection are plain files on nfs, local or remote)
2. I want to use the select cmd to select messages matching all the
alt-addresses for to: and cc: (receipients) ie. select messages directly to
or cc me (+ and - marked in index view if mark-for-cc is enabled). Is it
possible?
3. Filter does not seem to match if the messge is missing a header field.
eg. match
[email protected] AND subject-pattern=abc
The message with the from and subject matching the above but do not have a
"To:" in the header, then the filter fail to match the message.
4. Can I expunge current message? (with an anonying 2MB attachment, but
don't want to expunge all with D flag)
TIA
P.Rocher
_________________________________________________________________
MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos:
http://photos.msn.com/support/worldwide.aspx
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------
For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see:
http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/
-----------------------------------------------------------------
From
[email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <
[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Wed, 9 Jan 2002 23:41:01 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <
[email protected]>
Received: from mailscan2.cac.washington.edu (mailscan2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.16])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW01.12) with SMTP id g0A7exV6026137
for <
[email protected]>; Wed, 9 Jan 2002 23:40:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: FROM mx2.cac.washington.edu BY mailscan2.cac.washington.edu ; Wed Jan 09 23:40:57 2002 -0800
Received: from list2.u.washington.edu (list2.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.165])
by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW01.12) with ESMTP id g0A7ev11022084;
Wed, 9 Jan 2002 23:40:57 -0800
Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13])
by list2.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.10) with SMTP id g0A7ea420432;
Wed, 9 Jan 2002 23:40:36 -0800
Received: from mailscan1.cac.washington.edu (mailscan1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.16])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.10) with SMTP id g0A7dPn165902
for <
[email protected]>; Wed, 9 Jan 2002 23:39:25 -0800
Received: FROM mxu3.u.washington.edu BY mailscan1.cac.washington.edu ; Wed Jan 09 23:39:21 2002 -0800
Received: from mailscan2.cac.washington.edu (mailscan2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.16])
by mxu3.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW01.12) with SMTP id g0A7dLm1004358
for <
[email protected]>; Wed, 9 Jan 2002 23:39:21 -0800
Received: FROM mx1.cac.washington.edu BY mailscan2.cac.washington.edu ; Wed Jan 09 23:39:20 2002 -0800
Received: from mxout2.cac.washington.edu (mxout2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.4])
by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW01.12) with ESMTP id g0A7dKpr021603
for <
[email protected]>; Wed, 9 Jan 2002 23:39:20 -0800
Received: from smtp.washington.edu (smtp.washington.edu [140.142.33.9])
by mxout2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW01.12) with ESMTP id g0A7dKQX007268;
Wed, 9 Jan 2002 23:39:20 -0800
Received: from shiva0.cac.washington.edu (shiva0.cac.washington.edu [140.142.100.200])
(authenticated bits=0)
by smtp.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW01.12) with ESMTP id g0A7dKvb007613
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO);
Wed, 9 Jan 2002 23:39:20 -0800
Message-Id: <Pine.LNX.4.50.0201092334430.19050-100000@shiva0.cac.washington.edu>
Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2002 23:39:20 -0800 (PST)
Sender:
[email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <
http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:
[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:
[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:
[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:
[email protected]>
From: Steve Hubert <
[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <
[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Pine 4.44 now available
In-Reply-To: <
[email protected]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-To: Eduardo Chappa <
[email protected]>,
Kenneth Crudup <
[email protected]>
X-Cc: Pine News Group <
[email protected]>
X-X-Sender:
[email protected]
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN
Status: O
X-Status:
X-Keywords:
X-UID: 47
If the url looks like
http://domain';command'
I think you'll get command executed. The IFS stuff will only work if you
have SHELL=/bin/sh or similar in your environment, I think. The example I
saw had an ampersand in place of the semicolon, which doesn't work for me.
Steve
From
[email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <
[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 10 Jan 2002 00:18:05 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <
[email protected]>
Received: from mailscan4.cac.washington.edu (mailscan4.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.15])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW01.12) with SMTP id g0A8I3V6012021
for <
[email protected]>; Thu, 10 Jan 2002 00:18:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: FROM mx2.cac.washington.edu BY mailscan4.cac.washington.edu ; Thu Jan 10 00:17:59 2002 -0800
Received: from list2.u.washington.edu (list2.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.165])
by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW01.12) with ESMTP id g0A8Hw11022772;
Thu, 10 Jan 2002 00:17:59 -0800
Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13])
by list2.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.10) with SMTP id g0A8Hd410562;
Thu, 10 Jan 2002 00:17:40 -0800
Received: from mailscan4.cac.washington.edu (mailscan4.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.15])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.10) with SMTP id g0A8Ftn137414
for <
[email protected]>; Thu, 10 Jan 2002 00:15:55 -0800
Received: FROM mxu1.u.washington.edu BY mailscan4.cac.washington.edu ; Thu Jan 10 00:15:54 2002 -0800
Received: from msgdirector2.onetel.net.uk (msgdirector2.onetel.net.uk [212.67.96.149])
by mxu1.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW01.12) with ESMTP id g0A8FrTA013850
for <
[email protected]>; Thu, 10 Jan 2002 00:15:54 -0800
Received: from [213.78.42.244] ([213.78.42.244])
by msgdirector2.onetel.net.uk (Mirapoint)
with ESMTP id ACP51185;
Thu, 10 Jan 2002 08:15:49 GMT
Message-Id: <Pine.WNT.4.43.0201100814180.-3965969-100000@no>
Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2002 08:25:09 +0000 (GMT)
Sender:
[email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <
http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:
[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:
[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:
[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:
[email protected]>
From: Nancy McGough <
[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <
[email protected]>
Subject: Re: TAB does not detect new messages in incoming folders
In-Reply-To: <
[email protected]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-To: Pine Discussion Forum <
[email protected]>
X-Message-Flag: Worried about Outlook viruses? Switch to Mac/Unix/PC Pine! Info @ www.ii.com
X-X-Sender:
[email protected]
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN
Status: O
X-Status:
X-Keywords:
X-UID: 48
On 10 Jan 2002 Pierre Rocher (
[email protected]) wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I don't seem to find answers to the following from the archive. Can
> someone help?
>
> 1. I recently added my own filter rules (using 4.43) so that matching
> messages will be moved to one of the Incoming Message Collection folders. In
> INBOX index, hitting TAB when cursor is at the last message, it loops thru
> the folders "Checking XXX for recent messages" and eventually "No more
> incoming folders" is displayed. However, it does not flag or display
> messages with new or important flag in any of the folders there. If the
> folder is opened then hit TAB, then TAB works for messages in the current
> folder. (note this is not the same issue of enable-circular-tab Eduardo has
> a patch for.) Tried on Solaris 2.5.1 and 2.7 and 2.8. This makes it pain to
> get new messages by opening each. (I'm filtering to about 20 folders!) It
> sounds like this is working for some ppl. Whats the trick?
>
> (my primary inbox is pop3, while the other folders in the incoming msg
> collection are plain files on nfs, local or remote)
>
> 2. I want to use the select cmd to select messages matching all the
> alt-addresses for to: and cc: (receipients) ie. select messages directly to
> or cc me (+ and - marked in index view if mark-for-cc is enabled). Is it
> possible?
>
> 3. Filter does not seem to match if the messge is missing a header field.
> eg. match
[email protected] AND subject-pattern=abc
> The message with the from and subject matching the above but do not have a
> "To:" in the header, then the filter fail to match the message.
>
> 4. Can I expunge current message? (with an anonying 2MB attachment, but
> don't want to expunge all with D flag)
>
> TIA
> P.Rocher
>
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos:
>
http://photos.msn.com/support/worldwide.aspx
>
> --
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see:
>
http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
>
Nancy
^x
REFERENCE:
The message I'm replying to -- and this entire thread & group --
may be available at
<
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=<
[email protected]>
--
ii Main Pine Page: <
http://www.ii.com/internet/messaging/pine/>
ii Procmail QStart: <
http://www.ii.com/internet/robots/procmail/qs/>
Nancy McGough <
http://www.ii.com/> Infinite Ink
--= Sent via Pine 4.43: IMAP, NNTP & ESMTP for Unix/Win/MacOS X =--
From
[email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <
[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 10 Jan 2002 00:23:47 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <
[email protected]>
Received: from mailscan1.cac.washington.edu (mailscan1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.16])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW01.12) with SMTP id g0A8NjV6000465
for <
[email protected]>; Thu, 10 Jan 2002 00:23:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: FROM mx1.cac.washington.edu BY mailscan1.cac.washington.edu ; Thu Jan 10 00:23:37 2002 -0800
Received: from list2.u.washington.edu (list2.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.165])
by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW01.12) with ESMTP id g0A8Nbpr022397;
Thu, 10 Jan 2002 00:23:37 -0800
Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13])
by list2.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.10) with SMTP id g0A8NL420222;
Thu, 10 Jan 2002 00:23:21 -0800
Received: from mailscan4.cac.washington.edu (mailscan4.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.15])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.10) with SMTP id g0A8MEn167316
for <
[email protected]>; Thu, 10 Jan 2002 00:22:14 -0800
Received: FROM mxu1.u.washington.edu BY mailscan4.cac.washington.edu ; Thu Jan 10 00:22:13 2002 -0800
Received: from msgdirector2.onetel.net.uk (msgdirector2.onetel.net.uk [212.67.96.149])
by mxu1.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW01.12) with ESMTP id g0A8MCTA014690
for <
[email protected]>; Thu, 10 Jan 2002 00:22:13 -0800
Received: from [213.78.42.244] ([213.78.42.244])
by msgdirector2.onetel.net.uk (Mirapoint)
with ESMTP id ACP51284;
Thu, 10 Jan 2002 08:22:10 GMT
Message-Id: <Pine.WNT.4.43.0201100828040.-3965969-100000@no>
Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2002 08:31:30 +0000 (GMT)
Sender:
[email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <
http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:
[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:
[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:
[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:
[email protected]>
From: Nancy McGough <
[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <
[email protected]>
Subject: Re: TAB does not detect new messages in incoming folders
In-Reply-To: <
[email protected]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-To: Pine Discussion Forum <
[email protected]>
X-Message-Flag: Worried about Outlook viruses? Switch to Mac/Unix/PC Pine! Info @ www.ii.com
X-X-Sender:
[email protected]
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN
Status: O
X-Status:
X-Keywords:
X-UID: 49
[Sorry about the no-new-content msg I just sent; I composed the
msg below in my alt editor (gvim) and then did a write and quit
(:wq) and came back to PC-Pine and pressed ^X. At that moment I
noticed that my message wasn't in the Message Text area.... seems
like a bug but I don't know if I can reproduce it!]
On 10 Jan 2002 Pierre Rocher (
[email protected]) wrote:
> 1. I recently added my own filter rules (using 4.43) so that matching
> messages will be moved to one of the Incoming Message Collection folders. In
> INBOX index, hitting TAB when cursor is at the last message, it loops thru
> the folders "Checking XXX for recent messages" and eventually "No more
> incoming folders" is displayed. However, it does not flag or display
> messages with new or important flag in any of the folders there. If the
> folder is opened then hit TAB, then TAB works for messages in the current
> folder. (note this is not the same issue of enable-circular-tab Eduardo has
> a patch for.) Tried on Solaris 2.5.1 and 2.7 and 2.8. This makes it pain to
> get new messages by opening each. (I'm filtering to about 20 folders!) It
> sounds like this is working for some ppl. Whats the trick?
Make sure this is unset
[ ] enable-fast-recent-test
Does that help??
> 2. I want to use the select cmd to select messages matching all the
> alt-addresses for to: and cc: (receipients) ie. select messages directly to
> or cc me (+ and - marked in index view if mark-for-cc is enabled). Is it
> possible?
One of my sample commands in this list
<
http://www.ii.com/internet/messaging/pine/#samples>
on my main Pine page does this for +.
W + CR W ^X Z
(note CR = carriage return)
display a virtual folder of all messages in the current folder or
newsgroup that contain your email address, or one of your
alt-addresses, in the To header
This isn't exact because it matches any index line that contains
a +.
Another thing you can do is set up indexcolors using MSRI to
color index lines that are to or cc you.
> 4. Can I expunge current message? (with an anonying 2MB attachment, but
> don't want to expunge all with D flag)
Not that I know of but it would be nice to have a "delete &
expunge" command in addition to delete (D) and expunge (X).
Hope this helps,
Nancy
^x
--
ii Main Pine Page: <
http://www.ii.com/internet/messaging/pine/>
Nancy McGough <
http://www.ii.com/> Infinite Ink
--= Sent via Pine 4.43: IMAP, NNTP & ESMTP for Unix/Win/MacOS X =--
From
[email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <
[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 10 Jan 2002 01:16:29 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <
[email protected]>
Received: from mailscan1.cac.washington.edu (mailscan1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.16])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW01.12) with SMTP id g0A9GRV6005591
for <
[email protected]>; Thu, 10 Jan 2002 01:16:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: FROM mx2.cac.washington.edu BY mailscan1.cac.washington.edu ; Thu Jan 10 01:16:22 2002 -0800
Received: from list4.u.washington.edu (list4.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.167])
by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW01.12) with ESMTP id g0A9GM11023678;
Thu, 10 Jan 2002 01:16:22 -0800
Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13])
by list4.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.10) with SMTP id g0A9Ejb17054;
Thu, 10 Jan 2002 01:14:46 -0800
Received: from mailscan5.cac.washington.edu (mailscan5.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.14])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.10) with SMTP id g0A9E0n14608
for <
[email protected]>; Thu, 10 Jan 2002 01:14:01 -0800
Received: FROM mxu4.u.washington.edu BY mailscan5.cac.washington.edu ; Thu Jan 10 01:13:57 2002 -0800
Received: from hotmail.com (f11.pav1.hotmail.com [64.4.31.11])
by mxu4.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW01.12) with ESMTP id g0A9DuVK032024
for <
[email protected]>; Thu, 10 Jan 2002 01:13:57 -0800
Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC;
Thu, 10 Jan 2002 01:13:56 -0800
Received: from 192.73.222.106 by pv1fd.pav1.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP;
Thu, 10 Jan 2002 09:13:56 GMT
Message-Id: <
[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2002 09:13:56 +0000
Sender:
[email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <
http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:
[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:
[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:
[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:
[email protected]>
From: "Pierre Rocher" <
[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <
[email protected]>
Subject: Re: TAB does not detect new messages in incoming folders
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed
X-Originating-IP: [192.73.222.106]
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 10 Jan 2002 09:13:56.0737 (UTC) FILETIME=[21BFD710:01C199B7]
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN
Status: O
X-Status:
X-Keywords:
X-UID: 50
Thanks, Nancy.
>Make sure this is unset
> [ ] enable-fast-recent-test
This is not set. Setting it makes it faster, but journal shows same.
Still does not go to next new. :(
>on my main Pine page does this for +.
> W + CR W ^X Z
This works very well. "+ " is even better. I don't have many "+" in my
message index (in subject or sender's name). "- " is different, since quite
some "space dash space" in subjects. Oh, you don't even need the CR. Just
W "+ " ^X Z will do (typed without the quotes ""). Do one for "+ " (no
zoom) and immediately "- ", and the selection adds the matches like Broaden
select. Very nice.
best regards,
P.Rocher
>From: Nancy McGough <
[email protected]>
>To: Pine Discussion Forum <
[email protected]>
>Subject: Re: TAB does not detect new messages in incoming folders
>Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2002 08:31:30 +0000 (GMT)
>
>[Sorry about the no-new-content msg I just sent; I composed the
>msg below in my alt editor (gvim) and then did a write and quit
>(:wq) and came back to PC-Pine and pressed ^X. At that moment I
>noticed that my message wasn't in the Message Text area.... seems
>like a bug but I don't know if I can reproduce it!]
>
>On 10 Jan 2002 Pierre Rocher (
[email protected]) wrote:
> > 1. I recently added my own filter rules (using 4.43) so that matching
> > messages will be moved to one of the Incoming Message Collection
>folders. In
> > INBOX index, hitting TAB when cursor is at the last message, it loops
>thru
> > the folders "Checking XXX for recent messages" and eventually "No more
> > incoming folders" is displayed. However, it does not flag or display
> > messages with new or important flag in any of the folders there. If the
> > folder is opened then hit TAB, then TAB works for messages in the
>current
> > folder. (note this is not the same issue of enable-circular-tab Eduardo
>has
> > a patch for.) Tried on Solaris 2.5.1 and 2.7 and 2.8. This makes it
>pain to
> > get new messages by opening each. (I'm filtering to about 20 folders!)
>It
> > sounds like this is working for some ppl. Whats the trick?
>
>Make sure this is unset
>
> [ ] enable-fast-recent-test
>
>Does that help??
>
>
> > 2. I want to use the select cmd to select messages matching all the
> > alt-addresses for to: and cc: (receipients) ie. select messages
>directly to
> > or cc me (+ and - marked in index view if mark-for-cc is enabled). Is
>it
> > possible?
>
>One of my sample commands in this list
>
> <
http://www.ii.com/internet/messaging/pine/#samples>
>
>on my main Pine page does this for +.
>
> W + CR W ^X Z
> (note CR = carriage return)
>
> display a virtual folder of all messages in the current folder or
> newsgroup that contain your email address, or one of your
> alt-addresses, in the To header
>
>This isn't exact because it matches any index line that contains
>a +.
>
>Another thing you can do is set up indexcolors using MSRI to
>color index lines that are to or cc you.
>
>
> > 4. Can I expunge current message? (with an anonying 2MB attachment, but
> > don't want to expunge all with D flag)
>
>Not that I know of but it would be nice to have a "delete &
>expunge" command in addition to delete (D) and expunge (X).
>
>Hope this helps,
>Nancy
>^x
>
>--
>ii Main Pine Page: <
http://www.ii.com/internet/messaging/pine/>
>
>Nancy McGough <
http://www.ii.com/> Infinite Ink
>--= Sent via Pine 4.43: IMAP, NNTP & ESMTP for Unix/Win/MacOS X =--
>
_________________________________________________________________
Join the world�s largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail.
http://www.hotmail.com
From
[email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <
[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 10 Jan 2002 01:39:36 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <
[email protected]>
Received: from mailscan4.cac.washington.edu (mailscan4.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.15])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW01.12) with SMTP id g0A9dZV6002012
for <
[email protected]>; Thu, 10 Jan 2002 01:39:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: FROM mx1.cac.washington.edu BY mailscan4.cac.washington.edu ; Thu Jan 10 01:39:31 2002 -0800
Received: from list1.u.washington.edu (list1.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.99])
by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW01.12) with ESMTP id g0A9dUpr023510;
Thu, 10 Jan 2002 01:39:30 -0800
Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13])
by list1.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.10) with SMTP id g0A9dC518714;
Thu, 10 Jan 2002 01:39:12 -0800
Received: from mailscan1.cac.washington.edu (mailscan1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.16])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.10) with SMTP id g0A9cRn50504
for <
[email protected]>; Thu, 10 Jan 2002 01:38:27 -0800
Received: FROM mxu2.u.washington.edu BY mailscan1.cac.washington.edu ; Thu Jan 10 01:38:23 2002 -0800
Received: from penguin-ext.wise.edt.ericsson.se (penguin-ext.wise.edt.ericsson.se [194.237.142.110])
by mxu2.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW01.12) with ESMTP id g0A9cM3F032633
for <
[email protected]>; Thu, 10 Jan 2002 01:38:22 -0800
Received: from madrid.ericsson.se (madrid.es.eu.ericsson.se [159.107.53.220])
by penguin.wise.edt.ericsson.se (8.11.0/8.11.0/WIREfire-1.3) with SMTP id g0A9cKK08925
for <
[email protected]>; Thu, 10 Jan 2002 10:38:21 +0100 (MET)
Received: from E00C04FFB5466 by madrid.ericsson.se (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4)
id KAA01163; Thu, 10 Jan 2002 10:38:15 +0100
Message-Id: <Pine.WNT.4.43.0201101037270.-547403@E00C04FFB5466.es.eu.ericsson.se>
Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2002 10:38:19 +0100 (Romance Standard Time)
Reply-To:
[email protected]
Sender:
[email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <
http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:
[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:
[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:
[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:
[email protected]>
From: "Bertrand PEREZ (REE)" <
[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <
[email protected]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-To: Pine INFO LIST <
[email protected]>
X-message-flag: "Outlook: A program to spread viri, but it can do mail too!"
X-X-Sender:
[email protected]
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN
Status: O
X-Status:
X-Keywords:
X-UID: 51
Hi,
could you please re-send me the URL for downloading PC-Pine 4.44 ?
it is not visible from the web page (washington.edu/pine) which still
points to 4.43.
thks and bet regards/Bertrand
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------
For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see:
http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/
-----------------------------------------------------------------
From
[email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <
[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 10 Jan 2002 19:54:29 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <
[email protected]>
Received: from mailscan2.cac.washington.edu (mailscan2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.16])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW01.12) with SMTP id g0B3sRV6012232
for <
[email protected]>; Thu, 10 Jan 2002 19:54:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: FROM mx1.cac.washington.edu BY mailscan2.cac.washington.edu ; Thu Jan 10 19:54:23 2002 -0800
Received: from list2.u.washington.edu (list2.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.165])
by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW01.12) with ESMTP id g0B3sNpr018598;
Thu, 10 Jan 2002 19:54:23 -0800
Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13])
by list2.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.10) with SMTP id g0B3rf405492;
Thu, 10 Jan 2002 19:53:41 -0800
Received: from mailscan5.cac.washington.edu (mailscan5.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.14])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.10) with SMTP id g0B3oKn67894
for <
[email protected]>; Thu, 10 Jan 2002 19:50:20 -0800
Received: FROM mxu4.u.washington.edu BY mailscan5.cac.washington.edu ; Thu Jan 10 19:50:19 2002 -0800
Received: from euler.math.washington.edu (euler.math.washington.edu [128.95.224.1])
by mxu4.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW01.12) with ESMTP id g0B3oJVK007362;
Thu, 10 Jan 2002 19:50:19 -0800
Received: from goedel1.math.washington.edu (goedel1.math.washington.edu [128.95.224.10])
by euler.math.washington.edu (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g0B3oJK252355;
Thu, 10 Jan 2002 19:50:19 -0800 (PST)
Message-Id: <Pine.OSF.4.44.0201101942120.125960-100000@goedel1.math.washington.edu>
Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2002 19:50:19 -0800 (PST)
Sender:
[email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <
http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:
[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:
[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:
[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:
[email protected]>
From: Eduardo Chappa <
[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <
[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Pine 4.44 now available
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.50.0201092334430.19050-100000@shiva0.cac.washington.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-To: Steve Hubert <
[email protected]>
X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum <
[email protected]>
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN
Status: O
X-Status:
X-Keywords:
X-UID: 52
*** Steve Hubert (
[email protected]) wrote in the pine-info list on Jan...:
:) If the url looks like
:)
:)
http://domain';command'
:)
:) I think you'll get command executed. The IFS stuff will only work if you
:) have SHELL=/bin/sh or similar in your environment, I think. The example I
:) saw had an ampersand in place of the semicolon, which doesn't work for me.
That's what I tried too, but wouldn't work here. I think the IFS stuff was
meant to make it write spaces. I tried this in a linux machine that I
could get access to, and the ';command' would get executed, but only if it
did not contain a space, so something like
http://www';xv' would be
executed but not
http://www';xv picture.gif', because of the space, as you
can see. Quite harmless, I think.
I also noticed that Pine would not expand shell variables in URLs as it
did before, that's a good change, I think.
--
Eduardo
http://www.math.washington.edu/~chappa/pine/
From
[email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <
[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 10 Jan 2002 23:15:53 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <
[email protected]>
Received: from mailscan5.cac.washington.edu (mailscan5.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.14])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW01.12) with SMTP id g0B7FqV6000896
for <
[email protected]>; Thu, 10 Jan 2002 23:15:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: FROM mx2.cac.washington.edu BY mailscan5.cac.washington.edu ; Thu Jan 10 23:15:47 2002 -0800
Received: from list2.u.washington.edu (list2.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.165])
by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW01.12) with ESMTP id g0B7Fl11022233;
Thu, 10 Jan 2002 23:15:47 -0800
Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13])
by list2.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.10) with SMTP id g0B7FP415104;
Thu, 10 Jan 2002 23:15:25 -0800
Received: from mailscan5.cac.washington.edu (mailscan5.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.14])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.10) with SMTP id g0B7DEn145498
for <
[email protected]>; Thu, 10 Jan 2002 23:13:14 -0800
Received: FROM mxu4.u.washington.edu BY mailscan5.cac.washington.edu ; Thu Jan 10 23:13:14 2002 -0800
Received: from msgdirector2.onetel.net.uk (msgdirector2.onetel.net.uk [212.67.96.149])
by mxu4.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW01.12) with ESMTP id g0B7DDVK010711
for <
[email protected]>; Thu, 10 Jan 2002 23:13:13 -0800
Received: from 213-78-74-202.friaco.onetel.net.uk (213-78-74-202.friaco.onetel.net.uk [213.78.74.202])
by msgdirector2.onetel.net.uk (Mirapoint)
with ESMTP id ACQ08368;
Fri, 11 Jan 2002 07:13:00 GMT
Message-Id: <Pine.WNT.4.44.0201110716560.-3995997-100000@no>
Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2002 07:22:29 +0000 (GMT)
Sender:
[email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <
http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:
[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:
[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:
[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:
[email protected]>
From: Nancy McGough <
[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <
[email protected]>
Subject: Re: PINE for Windows
In-Reply-To: <Pine.WNT.4.43.0201102051380.1772-100000@Orion>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-To: Pine Discussion Forum <
[email protected]>
X-Message-Flag: Worried about Outlook viruses? Switch to Mac/Unix/PC Pine! Info @ www.ii.com
X-X-Sender:
[email protected]
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN
Status: O
X-Status:
X-Keywords:
X-UID: 53
On 10 Jan 2002 Infodesk (
[email protected]) wrote:
> > <
http://www.ii.com/internet/messaging/pine/pc/>
> >
> > I've just updated so it now includes some info about the euro
> > sign and a lot more...
> >
> I tried that Euro sign solution but it doesn't work here, all I get in
> PcPine is a double letter combination being ^ and @
What euro sign solution are you referring to? I've tried to make
it clear that the solution is to write EUR and not use the euro
sign in email. Here's the relevant part of my Power Pine page:
Unfortunately, there are currently many problems with using the
euro sign in email and it is recommend that you type the string
EUR instead of . For a discussion of the problems, including
why you may not see the euro sign that is the last character of
the previous sentence, see Jukka "Yucca" Korpela's the euro sign
in HTML and in some other contexts.
Maybe I need to rewrite this...
Thanks,
Nancy
^x
--
ii Main Pine Page: <
http://www.ii.com/internet/messaging/pine/>
Nancy McGough <
http://www.ii.com/> Infinite Ink
--= Sent via Pine 4.44: IMAP, NNTP & ESMTP for Unix/Win/MacOS X =--
From
[email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <
[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Fri, 11 Jan 2002 15:39:20 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <
[email protected]>
Received: from mailscan1.cac.washington.edu (mailscan1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.16])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW01.12) with SMTP id g0BNdIV6028229
for <
[email protected]>; Fri, 11 Jan 2002 15:39:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: FROM mx1.cac.washington.edu BY mailscan1.cac.washington.edu ; Fri Jan 11 15:39:16 2002 -0800
Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100])
by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW01.12) with ESMTP id g0BNdGpr012458;
Fri, 11 Jan 2002 15:39:16 -0800
Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13])
by list3.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.10) with SMTP id g0BNcmx18100;
Fri, 11 Jan 2002 15:38:48 -0800
Received: from mailscan1.cac.washington.edu (mailscan1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.16])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.10) with SMTP id g0BNb6n60808
for <
[email protected]>; Fri, 11 Jan 2002 15:37:06 -0800
Received: FROM mxu3.u.washington.edu BY mailscan1.cac.washington.edu ; Fri Jan 11 15:37:06 2002 -0800
Received: from hotmail.com (f41.pav1.hotmail.com [64.4.31.41])
by mxu3.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW01.12) with ESMTP id g0BNb5m1015375
for <
[email protected]>; Fri, 11 Jan 2002 15:37:05 -0800
Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC;
Fri, 11 Jan 2002 15:37:05 -0800
Received: from 147.11.36.25 by pv1fd.pav1.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP;
Fri, 11 Jan 2002 23:37:05 GMT
Message-Id: <
[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2002 23:37:05 +0000
Sender:
[email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <
http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:
[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:
[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:
[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:
[email protected]>
From: "Pierre Rocher" <
[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <
[email protected]>
Subject: Re: TAB does not detect new messages in incoming folders
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed
X-Originating-IP: [147.11.36.25]
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 11 Jan 2002 23:37:05.0644 (UTC) FILETIME=[E0C1AAC0:01C19AF8]
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN
Status: O
X-Status:
X-Keywords:
X-UID: 54
Hi,
Thanks to Eduardo suggestion to use _IMAPSTATUS_ to examine the message
status, I've identified a couple of bugs and got one of them fixed. The
original problem:
> hitting TAB when cursor is at the last message, it loops thru
> the folders "Checking XXX for recent messages" and eventually "No
> more incoming folders" is displayed. However, it does not flag
> or display messages with new flag in any of the folders there.
IMAPSTATUS provides the clue. Further tests suggest with the detailed
status of IMAPSTATUS [N,R,U], TAB does find messages with the N flag, but
not R nor U. There are two bugs:
Bug 1: TAB only finds messages in the incoming collection folders with the
"N" status only, where it should detect both "N" and "U" statuses.
Bug 2: This is more obscure - messages which should be tagged with the "N"
flag is tagged with the "U" flag instead. There is only one time where I
saw a filtered msg folder gets the "N" status and TAB detected it. Cannot
reproduce that again. Initially, I suspect the checking of folders resulted
from the TAB implicitly does an open, causing msgs with N status to become
U. However, with a filter-to folder already opened (current folder) and a
new msg is filtered into it, the status is U immediately!
The combination of bug 1 and 2 render the TAB key rather useless for
checking new messages other than INBOX (for POP3 at least). The fix for Bug
1 is included below. I've built (what a nightmare) my own 4.44a version and
tested this on my solaris to be working as I want. Bug 2 doesn't bother me
since the message will be marked UNSEEN anyway, and TAB detects UNSEEN ones.
% diff /usr/local/pine/pine4.44/pine/folder.c my/folder.c
7098c7098,7099
< !context_status(cntxt, stream, f->name, SA_RECENT)){
---
> !context_status(cntxt, stream, f->name,
> SA_RECENT | SA_UNSEEN)){
7104,7105c7105,7107
< rv = ((mm_status_result.flags & SA_RECENT)
< && (*find_recent = mm_status_result.recent))
---
> rv = ((mm_status_result.flags & (SA_RECENT | SA_UNSEEN))
> && (*find_recent =
> (mm_status_result.recent |
>mm_status_result.unseen)))
I wonder if SA_RECENT is even needed, but I don't really care since the
executable works the way I wanted. Hope this will be fixed in next version,
or someone grab it as a contrib patch.
Best regards,
P.Rocher
_________________________________________________________________
Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger:
http://messenger.msn.com
From
[email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <
[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Fri, 11 Jan 2002 16:21:13 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <
[email protected]>
Received: from mailscan6.cac.washington.edu (mailscan6.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.14])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW01.12) with SMTP id g0C0L9V6021276
for <
[email protected]>; Fri, 11 Jan 2002 16:21:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: FROM mx2.cac.washington.edu BY mailscan6.cac.washington.edu ; Fri Jan 11 16:21:08 2002 -0800
Received: from list2.u.washington.edu (list2.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.165])
by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW01.12) with ESMTP id g0C0L711013674;
Fri, 11 Jan 2002 16:21:07 -0800
Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13])
by list2.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.10) with SMTP id g0C0Kp417006;
Fri, 11 Jan 2002 16:20:51 -0800
Received: from mailscan3.cac.washington.edu (mailscan3.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.15])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.10) with SMTP id g0C0Jln29952
for <
[email protected]>; Fri, 11 Jan 2002 16:19:48 -0800
Received: FROM mxu3.u.washington.edu BY mailscan3.cac.washington.edu ; Fri Jan 11 16:19:47 2002 -0800
Received: from euler.math.washington.edu (euler.math.washington.edu [128.95.224.1])
by mxu3.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW01.12) with ESMTP id g0C0Jlm1026483
for <
[email protected]>; Fri, 11 Jan 2002 16:19:47 -0800
Received: from goedel3.math.washington.edu (goedel3.math.washington.edu [128.95.224.12])
by euler.math.washington.edu (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g0C0JkK314574;
Fri, 11 Jan 2002 16:19:46 -0800 (PST)
Message-Id: <Pine.OSF.4.44.0201111611180.350789-100000@goedel3.math.washington.edu>
Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2002 16:19:45 -0800 (PST)
Sender:
[email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <
http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:
[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:
[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:
[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:
[email protected]>
From: Eduardo Chappa <
[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <
[email protected]>
Subject: Re: TAB does not detect new messages in incoming folders
In-Reply-To: <
[email protected]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-To: Pierre Rocher <
[email protected]>
X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum <
[email protected]>
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN
Status: O
X-Status:
X-Keywords:
X-UID: 55
*** Pierre Rocher (
[email protected]) wrote in the pine-info list today:
:) IMAPSTATUS provides the clue. Further tests suggest with the detailed
:) status of IMAPSTATUS [N,R,U], TAB does find messages with the N flag, but
:) not R nor U. There are two bugs:
:)
:) Bug 1: TAB only finds messages in the incoming collection folders with the
:) "N" status only, where it should detect both "N" and "U" statuses.
Hello Pierre,
Tab only tries to find messages with the "N" flag. Messages with the "U"
flag are messages that were in the folder the last time it was opened,
but you either did not read them or decided to read them and flag them as
new again. If you close that folder (without deleting that message), the
next time it is opened you will see it marked with a "U".
From here it follows that TAB is working correctly in your case, because
IMAPSTATUS is telling you that somehow between the moment that the message
was saved in the folder and the moment that TAB is doing the check, the
folder was read or it was touched by some other process. It may be that by
saving the files, the folder is considered to be opened. This should be
the bug, I use Pine filters to filter messages from INBOX to an incoming
folder and do not have this problem.
--
Eduardo
http://www.math.washington.edu/~chappa/pine/
From
[email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <
[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Fri, 11 Jan 2002 18:43:39 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <
[email protected]>
Received: from mailscan1.cac.washington.edu (mailscan1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.16])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW01.12) with SMTP id g0C2hbV6015714
for <
[email protected]>; Fri, 11 Jan 2002 18:43:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: FROM mx1.cac.washington.edu BY mailscan1.cac.washington.edu ; Fri Jan 11 18:43:33 2002 -0800
Received: from list1.u.washington.edu (list1.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.99])
by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW01.12) with ESMTP id g0C2hWpr016671;
Fri, 11 Jan 2002 18:43:32 -0800
Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13])
by list1.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.10) with SMTP id g0C2gr528198;
Fri, 11 Jan 2002 18:42:53 -0800
Received: from mailscan2.cac.washington.edu (mailscan2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.16])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.10) with SMTP id g0C2g1n60758
for <
[email protected]>; Fri, 11 Jan 2002 18:42:01 -0800
Received: FROM mxu2.u.washington.edu BY mailscan2.cac.washington.edu ; Fri Jan 11 18:41:16 2002 -0800
Received: from hotmail.com (f156.pav1.hotmail.com [64.4.31.156])
by mxu2.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW01.12) with ESMTP id g0C2fF3F024522
for <
[email protected]>; Fri, 11 Jan 2002 18:41:15 -0800
Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC;
Fri, 11 Jan 2002 18:41:15 -0800
Received: from 147.11.36.25 by pv1fd.pav1.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP;
Sat, 12 Jan 2002 02:41:15 GMT
Message-Id: <
[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2002 02:41:15 +0000
Sender:
[email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <
http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:
[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:
[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:
[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:
[email protected]>
From: "Pierre Rocher" <
[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <
[email protected]>
Subject: Re: TAB does not detect new messages in incoming folders
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed
X-Originating-IP: [147.11.36.25]
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 12 Jan 2002 02:41:15.0295 (UTC) FILETIME=[9ADC9AF0:01C19B12]
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN
Status: O
X-Status:
X-Keywords:
X-UID: 56
I have to disagree. Here are the reasons:
1. Pine traditionally collapses UNSEEN and NEW messages into one catagory
represented by the "N" flag (unless the non-default IMAPSTATUS is used).
Treating them differently while they both get status "N" violates the
consistency.
2. When people cannot read all NEW email during each folder open session, it
is crucial to allow people to treat the UNSEEN messages as NEW ones. This is
in fact one of the reasons I choose pine over some other clients which
forces read flag or moves the msgs away from inbox upon session exit. eg. I
frequently dial up to read interesting/urgent messages only, leaving the
uninteresting ones to be read when I go to the lab. While pine can tell me
if there are NEW messages in a folder, I have to open the folder's index
view to determine if any is interesting (by sender or subject). I then read
the interesting ones, leaving others unread, and close the folder and
eventually the pine session. Back in the lab, those non-NEW unread (aka
UNSEEN ones) have the same meaning as new messages to me.
3. The intention of TAB is to check for NEW messages in the incoming folder
collection. Let's think for a moment what is important to a person reading
email:
- the ability to tell apart a message that comes in after I opened the
folder, and a message that came in before I opened the folder.
- the ability to tell apart a message that has not been read, and a message
that has been read (at least skim/scan its contents).
Notice filtering to an incoming folder, one should treat such a folder as an
inbox and not a folder to store messages. If you don't even bother if a
message is briefly read or not, you can filter to a non-incoming folder.
This seems to introduce the need of treating UNSEEN messages different
between incoming folders and non-incomping folders, but fortunately, TAB
mail checking has no notion for non-incoming folders.
4. To wrap up, if you think one wants to tell if messages have come in since
the folder's last close (ie. TAB checks SA_RECENT only and not SA_UNSEEN),
you are making the assumption that the person has skimmed thru all messages
in that folder last time before closing it. In mordern days, most people
get much more messages than those that are really destined to them or
concern them, because of group aliases, news, junk mail, etc. A good portion
of the new messages goes directly into the trash, and it's hard to finish
the messages before closing the session. In the old days, one checks the
mail twice a day and would be happy if gets copule of new messages.
Remeber those days when pine resisted filters, because servers or external
programs are better at the job? IMAP changed that by defining the norm of
the public checks their mail from different domains, unix, pc, etc. Inbox
and active files stay on the server, while archives (or more often over
quota data) are kept on your own local host. Filtering email before email
client accesses them will put the filtered messages onto a relatively-local
file system which is against the IMAP idea, or is there any sysadmin wants
everyone to run programs on the mail server so that the filtered messages
are still on the server? Time has changed, and so should our concept on how
things are done.
Best regards,
P.Rocher
PS. Pine seems to use the term "recent" in different ways. The help doc says
a message with the "R" flag means recent message, which is one that is "new
to the folder and has been viewed." (see IMAPSTATUS "R") The flag SA_RECENT
in the source is explained as "recent messages" which doesn't tell much, but
obviously meaning "new" and/xor "unread" messages when examining closed
folder for SA_RECENT messages. So one is viewed, one is not. I attribute
this as the different meaning of "recent" between pine's interface to imap
vs pine interface to the user, which is perfectly okay.
>From: Eduardo Chappa <
[email protected]>
>To: Pine Discussion Forum <
[email protected]>
>Subject: Re: TAB does not detect new messages in incoming folders
>Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2002 16:19:45 -0800 (PST)
>
>*** Pierre Rocher (
[email protected]) wrote in the pine-info list today:
>
>:) IMAPSTATUS provides the clue. Further tests suggest with the detailed
>:) status of IMAPSTATUS [N,R,U], TAB does find messages with the N flag,
>but
>:) not R nor U. There are two bugs:
>:)
>:) Bug 1: TAB only finds messages in the incoming collection folders with
>the
>:) "N" status only, where it should detect both "N" and "U" statuses.
>
>Hello Pierre,
>
> Tab only tries to find messages with the "N" flag. Messages with the "U"
>flag are messages that were in the folder the last time it was opened,
>but you either did not read them or decided to read them and flag them as
>new again. If you close that folder (without deleting that message), the
>next time it is opened you will see it marked with a "U".
>
> From here it follows that TAB is working correctly in your case, because
>IMAPSTATUS is telling you that somehow between the moment that the message
>was saved in the folder and the moment that TAB is doing the check, the
>folder was read or it was touched by some other process. It may be that by
>saving the files, the folder is considered to be opened. This should be
>the bug, I use Pine filters to filter messages from INBOX to an incoming
>folder and do not have this problem.
>
>--
>Eduardo
>
http://www.math.washington.edu/~chappa/pine/
>
_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at
http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp.
From
[email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <
[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Sat, 12 Jan 2002 11:27:46 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <
[email protected]>
Received: from mailscan1.cac.washington.edu (mailscan1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.16])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW01.12) with SMTP id g0CJRiV6023292
for <
[email protected]>; Sat, 12 Jan 2002 11:27:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: FROM mx1.cac.washington.edu BY mailscan1.cac.washington.edu ; Sat Jan 12 11:27:40 2002 -0800
Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100])
by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW01.12) with ESMTP id g0CJRdpr031894;
Sat, 12 Jan 2002 11:27:39 -0800
Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13])
by list3.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.10) with SMTP id g0CJQnx18478;
Sat, 12 Jan 2002 11:26:49 -0800
Received: from mailscan1.cac.washington.edu (mailscan1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.16])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.10) with SMTP id g0CJPBn79748
for <
[email protected]>; Sat, 12 Jan 2002 11:25:11 -0800
Received: FROM mxu2.u.washington.edu BY mailscan1.cac.washington.edu ; Sat Jan 12 11:25:10 2002 -0800
Received: from euler.math.washington.edu (euler.math.washington.edu [128.95.224.1])
by mxu2.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW01.12) with ESMTP id g0CJPA3F013172
for <
[email protected]>; Sat, 12 Jan 2002 11:25:10 -0800
Received: from goedel1.math.washington.edu (goedel1.math.washington.edu [128.95.224.10])
by euler.math.washington.edu (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g0CJPAK349900;
Sat, 12 Jan 2002 11:25:10 -0800 (PST)
Message-Id: <Pine.OSF.4.44.0201121102020.171941-100000@goedel1.math.washington.edu>
Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2002 11:25:10 -0800 (PST)
Sender:
[email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <
http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:
[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:
[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:
[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:
[email protected]>
From: Eduardo Chappa <
[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <
[email protected]>
Subject: Re: TAB does not detect new messages in incoming folders
In-Reply-To: <
[email protected]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-To: Pierre Rocher <
[email protected]>
X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum <
[email protected]>
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN
Status: O
X-Status:
X-Keywords:
X-UID: 57
*** Pierre Rocher (
[email protected]) wrote in the pine-info list today:
:) I have to disagree. Here are the reasons:
:)
:) 1. Pine traditionally collapses UNSEEN and NEW messages into one
:) catagory represented by the "N" flag (unless the non-default IMAPSTATUS
:) is used). Treating them differently while they both get status "N"
:) violates the consistency.
It may have been a design decision. The first versions of Pine were not
designed to be used for power users, so probably adding a "U" to the index
would have been confusing at the time.
I believe there's a clear distinction between messages that are *new*
(those that arrive to your mailbox and when you open it you say "oh!, I
got a new mail from XYZ") and those that are *old* (those that arrived in
an earlier session and you said at that time "I'll read this message later
- or in another session", or maybe said "ok, I read this message, but I'll
keep it here until next time I open this folder, so I'll flag it as new so
that it is not saved automatically").
The real problem is if Pine should "lie" to you and tell you that
something is new when it is not. Most people are already accostumed to
seeing the "N" flag for messages that are not really new, but that are
old. The advantage of IMAPSTATUS over STATUS is that you can see which
messages are really new, as opposed to those that are old.
Personally, I like the fact that TAB only finds new messages, because if a
folder is skipped by TAB, it means to me that no new messages have arrived
to that folder since the last time I opened it, which saves me the time of
opening the folder, to only see messages that I haven't read for whatever
reason or that I read and did not delete.
I am not saying that there should not be a key that finds "new" and
"unseen" messages, but I'd rather have TAB only find those that are really
"new".
--
Eduardo
http://www.math.washington.edu/~chappa/pine/
P.S. This is a minor issue, do you know if hotmail will ever include the
"in-reply-to" header to messages that are replies to messages in their
INBOX?
From
[email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <
[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Mon, 14 Jan 2002 14:38:13 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <
[email protected]>
Received: from mailscan1.cac.washington.edu (mailscan1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.16])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW01.12) with SMTP id g0EMcCV6003952
for <
[email protected]>; Mon, 14 Jan 2002 14:38:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: FROM mx1.cac.washington.edu BY mailscan1.cac.washington.edu ; Mon Jan 14 14:38:10 2002 -0800
Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100])
by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW01.12) with ESMTP id g0EMcApr021408;
Mon, 14 Jan 2002 14:38:10 -0800
Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13])
by list3.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.10) with SMTP id g0EMbhx19548;
Mon, 14 Jan 2002 14:37:43 -0800
Received: from mailscan4.cac.washington.edu (mailscan4.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.15])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.10) with SMTP id g0EKO2v37172
for <
[email protected]>; Mon, 14 Jan 2002 12:24:02 -0800
Received: FROM mxu4.u.washington.edu BY mailscan4.cac.washington.edu ; Mon Jan 14 12:24:01 2002 -0800
Received: from server10.safepages.com (server10.safepages.com [216.127.146.24])
by mxu4.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW01.12) with ESMTP id g0EKNuVK009502
for <
[email protected]>; Mon, 14 Jan 2002 12:24:01 -0800
Received: from mohnkern (washdc-208-186-26-2.safepages.com [208.186.26.2])
by server10.safepages.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C785D3C6DE
for <
[email protected]>; Mon, 14 Jan 2002 20:21:38 +0000 (GMT)
Message-Id: <3C42F7FB.12575.148AA27@localhost>
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2002 15:23:39 -0500
Sender:
[email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <
http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:
[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:
[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:
[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:
[email protected]>
From: "Scott Mohnkern" <
[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <
[email protected]>
Subject: Moved to a new box, missing environment variable?
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Content-description: Mail message body
X-pmrqc: 1
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN
Status: O
X-Status:
X-Keywords:
X-UID: 58
We recently replaced a hard drive, and are seeing a problem with pine.440 on Solaris 5.6.
The problem is pine.440 isn't finding user's mail spool, and instead, it's saying "using inbox" in
their configuration.
A user can manually go in, and change their configuration, but it's clear there's some file that was
on the old box, that's missing from the new box.
Scott
Scott Mohnkern
[email protected]
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------
For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see:
http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/
-----------------------------------------------------------------
From
[email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <
[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Mon, 14 Jan 2002 14:39:20 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <
[email protected]>
Received: from mailscan5.cac.washington.edu (mailscan5.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.14])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW01.12) with SMTP id g0EMdFV6018121
for <
[email protected]>; Mon, 14 Jan 2002 14:39:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: FROM mx2.cac.washington.edu BY mailscan5.cac.washington.edu ; Mon Jan 14 14:39:12 2002 -0800
Received: from list1.u.washington.edu (list1.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.99])
by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW01.12) with ESMTP id g0EMdB11021138;
Mon, 14 Jan 2002 14:39:12 -0800
Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13])
by list1.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.10) with SMTP id g0EMcm516960;
Mon, 14 Jan 2002 14:38:49 -0800
Received: from mailscan3.cac.washington.edu (mailscan3.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.15])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.10) with SMTP id g0EKjIv90090
for <
[email protected]>; Mon, 14 Jan 2002 12:45:19 -0800
Received: FROM mxu1.u.washington.edu BY mailscan3.cac.washington.edu ; Mon Jan 14 12:45:17 2002 -0800
Received: from server3.safepages.com (server3.safepages.com [216.127.146.5])
by mxu1.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW01.12) with ESMTP id g0EKjFTA000978
for <
[email protected]>; Mon, 14 Jan 2002 12:45:16 -0800
Received: from mohnkern (washdc-208-186-26-2.safepages.com [208.186.26.2])
by server3.safepages.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54A2D5D40
for <
[email protected]>; Mon, 14 Jan 2002 20:45:08 +0000 (GMT)
Message-Id: <3C42FD7A.13569.15E228C@localhost>
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2002 15:47:06 -0500
Sender:
[email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <
http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:
[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:
[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:
[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:
[email protected]>
From: "Scott Mohnkern" <
[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <
[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Pine 4.44 now available
In-Reply-To: <Pine.OSF.4.44.0201101942120.125960-100000@goedel1.math.washington.edu>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.50.0201092334430.19050-100000@shiva0.cac.washington.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Content-description: Mail message body
X-To: Pine Discussion Forum <
[email protected]>
X-pmrqc: 1
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN
Status: O
X-Status:
X-Keywords:
X-UID: 59
I'm running Solaris, version 5.6, instead of 5.8, and when I try to run the 5.8 binary I get
ld.so.1: ./pine-bin.sun58: fatal: libcurses.so.1: open failed: No such file or directory
Killed
Does someone have a 5.6 binary, or is there a way to fix this?
Scott
Scott Mohnkern
[email protected]
From
[email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <
[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Mon, 14 Jan 2002 17:08:55 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <
[email protected]>
Received: from mailscan1.cac.washington.edu (mailscan1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.16])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW01.12) with SMTP id g0F18rV6020435
for <
[email protected]>; Mon, 14 Jan 2002 17:08:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: FROM mx1.cac.washington.edu BY mailscan1.cac.washington.edu ; Mon Jan 14 17:08:51 2002 -0800
Received: from list1.u.washington.edu (list1.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.99])
by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW01.12) with ESMTP id g0F18ppr026363;
Mon, 14 Jan 2002 17:08:51 -0800
Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13])
by list1.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.10) with SMTP id g0F18U507154;
Mon, 14 Jan 2002 17:08:30 -0800
Received: from mailscan1.cac.washington.edu (mailscan1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.16])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.10) with SMTP id g0F0UwK17076
for <
[email protected]>; Mon, 14 Jan 2002 16:30:59 -0800
Received: FROM mxu4.u.washington.edu BY mailscan1.cac.washington.edu ; Mon Jan 14 15:28:21 2002 -0800
Received: from moultrie.cse.sc.edu ([129.252.138.7])
by mxu4.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW01.12) with ESMTP id g0ENSKVK032499
for <
[email protected]>; Mon, 14 Jan 2002 15:28:20 -0800
Received: from mum.cse.sc.edu (mum.cse.sc.edu [129.252.138.21])
by moultrie.cse.sc.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 182D01FA24
for <
[email protected]>; Mon, 14 Jan 2002 18:28:19 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <
[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2002 18:28:19 -0500 (EST)
Sender:
[email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <
http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:
[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:
[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:
[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:
[email protected]>
From: Gopi Sundaram <
[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <
[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Moved to a new box, missing environment variable?
In-Reply-To: <3C42F7FB.12575.148AA27@localhost>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-To: Pine Discussion Forum <
[email protected]>
X-X-Sender:
[email protected]
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN
Status: O
X-Status:
X-Keywords:
X-UID: 60
On Mon, 14 Jan 2002, Scott Mohnkern wrote:
> A user can manually go in, and change their configuration, but it's
> clear there's some file that was on the old box, that's missing from
> the new box.
You're missing a pine.conf file. It should probably be in
/usr/local/lib/. Check The .pine-debug file to be sure. Look near the
top for the error message.
--
Gopi Sundaram
[email protected]
http://www.cse.sc.edu/~gopalan/Pine/
From
[email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <
[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Wed, 16 Jan 2002 21:54:03 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <
[email protected]>
Received: from mailscan3.cac.washington.edu (mailscan3.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.15])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with SMTP id g0H5s17i004856
for <
[email protected]>; Wed, 16 Jan 2002 21:54:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: FROM mx2.cac.washington.edu BY mailscan3.cac.washington.edu ; Wed Jan 16 21:53:55 2002 -0800
Received: from list4.u.washington.edu (list4.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.167])
by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with ESMTP id g0H5rtmT032271;
Wed, 16 Jan 2002 21:53:55 -0800
Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13])
by list4.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.10) with SMTP id g0H5qmb09496;
Wed, 16 Jan 2002 21:52:48 -0800
Received: from mailscan5.cac.washington.edu (mailscan5.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.14])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.10) with SMTP id g0H5osK64190
for <
[email protected]>; Wed, 16 Jan 2002 21:50:54 -0800
Received: FROM mxu4.u.washington.edu BY mailscan5.cac.washington.edu ; Wed Jan 16 21:50:53 2002 -0800
Received: from hotmail.com (f51.pav1.hotmail.com [64.4.31.51])
by mxu4.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with ESMTP id g0H5oq37009106
for <
[email protected]>; Wed, 16 Jan 2002 21:50:53 -0800
Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC;
Wed, 16 Jan 2002 21:50:52 -0800
Received: from 147.11.36.25 by pv1fd.pav1.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP;
Thu, 17 Jan 2002 05:50:51 GMT
Message-Id: <
[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2002 05:50:51 +0000
Sender:
[email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <
http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:
[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:
[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:
[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:
[email protected]>
From: "Pierre Rocher" <
[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <
[email protected]>
Subject: Re: TAB does not detect new messages in incoming folders
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed
X-Cc:
[email protected]
X-Originating-IP: [147.11.36.25]
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 17 Jan 2002 05:50:52.0770 (UTC) FILETIME=[EC6E4420:01C19F1A]
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN
Status: O
X-Status:
X-Keywords:
X-UID: 61
I think implementing this new feature "[X] tab-skips-incoming-unread" is the
answer to accommodate different users and keep pine's consistency. Because
of the default aggregate of "U" and "N" into "N", and the current definition
of "tab-visits-next-new-message-only", it make sense to set the default to
TAB checks unread, and can optionally enabled to check for new only. It
will be something like:
FEATURE: tab-skips-incoming-unread
This feature affects Pine's behavior when using the TAB key to detect new
messages in the incoming mail folder collection. Pine's usual behavior is to
notify if any message in an incoming folder has the new or unread status.
Setting this feature causes Pine to notify of new messages only if a message
in an incoming folder has the new status. Messages that have the unread
status will not be reported. A message gets the new status if it arrived
since the mail folder was last closed.
Notice that Pine typically represents both the new status and the unread
status with the "N" flag, unless the IMAPSTATUS token is used where unread
status is represented by the "U" flag instead.
<End of help on this topic>
This is the current description of the existing feature:
FEATURE: tab-visits-next-new-message-only
This feature affects Pine's behavior when using the TAB key to move from one
message to the next. Pine's usual behavior is to select the next unread
message or message flagged as "Important".
Setting this feature causes Pine to skip the messages flagged as important,
and select unread messages exclusively. Tab behavior when there are no new
messages left to select remains unchanged.
<End of help on this topic>
best regards,
P.Rocher
>From: Eduardo Chappa <
[email protected]>
>To: Pierre Rocher <
[email protected]>
>CC: Pine Discussion Forum <
[email protected]>
>Subject: Re: TAB does not detect new messages in incoming folders
>Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2002 11:25:10 -0800 (PST)
>
>*** Pierre Rocher (
[email protected]) wrote in the pine-info list today:
>
>:) I have to disagree. Here are the reasons:
>:)
>:) 1. Pine traditionally collapses UNSEEN and NEW messages into one
>:) catagory represented by the "N" flag (unless the non-default IMAPSTATUS
>:) is used). Treating them differently while they both get status "N"
>:) violates the consistency.
>
>It may have been a design decision. The first versions of Pine were not
>designed to be used for power users, so probably adding a "U" to the index
>would have been confusing at the time.
>
>I believe there's a clear distinction between messages that are *new*
>(those that arrive to your mailbox and when you open it you say "oh!, I
>got a new mail from XYZ") and those that are *old* (those that arrived in
>an earlier session and you said at that time "I'll read this message later
>- or in another session", or maybe said "ok, I read this message, but I'll
>keep it here until next time I open this folder, so I'll flag it as new so
>that it is not saved automatically").
>
>The real problem is if Pine should "lie" to you and tell you that
>something is new when it is not. Most people are already accostumed to
>seeing the "N" flag for messages that are not really new, but that are
>old. The advantage of IMAPSTATUS over STATUS is that you can see which
>messages are really new, as opposed to those that are old.
>
>Personally, I like the fact that TAB only finds new messages, because if a
>folder is skipped by TAB, it means to me that no new messages have arrived
>to that folder since the last time I opened it, which saves me the time of
>opening the folder, to only see messages that I haven't read for whatever
>reason or that I read and did not delete.
>
>I am not saying that there should not be a key that finds "new" and
>"unseen" messages, but I'd rather have TAB only find those that are really
>"new".
>
>--
>Eduardo
>
http://www.math.washington.edu/~chappa/pine/
>
>P.S. This is a minor issue, do you know if hotmail will ever include the
>"in-reply-to" header to messages that are replies to messages in their
>INBOX?
>
_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at
http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp.
From
[email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <
[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Wed, 16 Jan 2002 22:46:39 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <
[email protected]>
Received: from mailscan5.cac.washington.edu (mailscan5.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.14])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with SMTP id g0H6kb7i019426
for <
[email protected]>; Wed, 16 Jan 2002 22:46:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: FROM mx1.cac.washington.edu BY mailscan5.cac.washington.edu ; Wed Jan 16 22:46:35 2002 -0800
Received: from list4.u.washington.edu (list4.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.167])
by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with ESMTP id g0H6kYPs001669;
Wed, 16 Jan 2002 22:46:35 -0800
Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13])
by list4.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.10) with SMTP id g0H6k9b33426;
Wed, 16 Jan 2002 22:46:09 -0800
Received: from mailscan5.cac.washington.edu (mailscan5.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.14])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.10) with SMTP id g0H6j9K84056
for <
[email protected]>; Wed, 16 Jan 2002 22:45:09 -0800
Received: FROM mxu1.u.washington.edu BY mailscan5.cac.washington.edu ; Wed Jan 16 22:45:08 2002 -0800
Received: from euler.math.washington.edu (euler.math.washington.edu [128.95.224.1])
by mxu1.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with ESMTP id g0H6j8pj014143
for <
[email protected]>; Wed, 16 Jan 2002 22:45:08 -0800
Received: from goedel1.math.washington.edu (goedel1.math.washington.edu [128.95.224.10])
by euler.math.washington.edu (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g0H6j7K99900;
Wed, 16 Jan 2002 22:45:07 -0800 (PST)
Message-Id: <Pine.OSF.4.44.0201162228410.273952-100000@goedel1.math.washington.edu>
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2002 22:45:06 -0800 (PST)
Sender:
[email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <
http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:
[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:
[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:
[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:
[email protected]>
From: Eduardo Chappa <
[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <
[email protected]>
Subject: Re: TAB does not detect new messages in incoming folders
In-Reply-To: <
[email protected]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-To: Pierre Rocher <
[email protected]>
X-Cc:
[email protected]
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN
Status: O
X-Status:
X-Keywords:
X-UID: 62
*** Pierre Rocher (
[email protected]) wrote on Jan 17, 2002:
:) I think implementing this new feature "[X] tab-skips-incoming-unread"
:) is the answer to accommodate different users and keep pine's
:) consistency.
The problem is what you get consistency with, either your idea of how TAB
should work (that is to say, TAB should find "Recent" or "Unseen"
messages) or the real way that TAB works (which only finds "Recent"
messages). Tab was not designed to look for unseen messages, so setting
the default of a feature to reverse this behavior does not do any good
for most of Pine users that use TAB in the above mentioned way.
I do agree that the solution is to make it configurable, and it is not
difficult to do so, but disagree that the default should be to look for
unseen messages (which takes more resources to find).
--
Eduardo
http://www.math.washington.edu/~chappa/pine/
From
[email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <
[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 17 Jan 2002 07:11:44 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <
[email protected]>
Received: from mailscan6.cac.washington.edu (mailscan6.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.14])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with SMTP id g0HFBh7i029213
for <
[email protected]>; Thu, 17 Jan 2002 07:11:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: FROM mx1.cac.washington.edu BY mailscan6.cac.washington.edu ; Thu Jan 17 07:11:37 2002 -0800
Received: from list1.u.washington.edu (list1.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.99])
by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with ESMTP id g0HFBbPs010232;
Thu, 17 Jan 2002 07:11:37 -0800
Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13])
by list1.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.10) with SMTP id g0HFBD522000;
Thu, 17 Jan 2002 07:11:14 -0800
Received: from mailscan6.cac.washington.edu (mailscan6.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.14])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.10) with SMTP id g0HFASK09858
for <
[email protected]>; Thu, 17 Jan 2002 07:10:28 -0800
Received: FROM mxu4.u.washington.edu BY mailscan6.cac.washington.edu ; Thu Jan 17 07:10:24 2002 -0800
Received: from jupiter.hc-sc.gc.ca (jupiter.hc-sc.gc.ca [198.103.237.7])
by mxu4.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with ESMTP id g0HFAN37012519
for <
[email protected]>; Thu, 17 Jan 2002 07:10:23 -0800
Received: from neptune.hc-sc.gc.ca (icarus.hc-sc.gc.ca [198.103.172.81])
by jupiter.hc-sc.gc.ca (8.11.4/8.11.4) with ESMTP id g0HF8JY01482
for <
[email protected]>; Thu, 17 Jan 2002 10:08:19 -0500 (EST)
Received: from smta00.hc-sc.gc.ca (smta00.hc-sc.gc.ca [142.4.99.231])
by neptune.hc-sc.gc.ca (8.11.4/8.11.4) with SMTP id g0HF7WL27969
for <
[email protected]>; Thu, 17 Jan 2002 10:07:32 -0500 (EST)
Received: by smta00.hc-sc.gc.ca(Lotus SMTP MTA v4.6.7 (934.1 12-30-1999)) id 85256B44.00531F17 ; Thu, 17 Jan 2002 10:07:34 -0500
Message-Id: <
[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2002 10:08:53 -0500
Sender:
[email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <
http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:
[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:
[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:
[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:
[email protected]>
From:
[email protected]
To: Pine Discussion Forum <
[email protected]>
Subject: Frustrating error 553
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Lotus-FromDomain: HWC
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN
Status: O
X-Status:
X-Keywords:
X-UID: 63
I gather that error: 553 covers many sins so it is not in itself diagnostic.
The actual error message is JUST too short for me to figure out what the $*#$%@
it means:
"[ Mail not sent. Sending error 553: Due to a small error in your Email s]"
It may be "small" but its terminal! HELP
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------
For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see:
http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/
-----------------------------------------------------------------
From
[email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <
[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 17 Jan 2002 09:10:21 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <
[email protected]>
Received: from mailscan4.cac.washington.edu (mailscan4.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.15])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with SMTP id g0HHAJ7i002252
for <
[email protected]>; Thu, 17 Jan 2002 09:10:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: FROM mx2.cac.washington.edu BY mailscan4.cac.washington.edu ; Thu Jan 17 09:10:17 2002 -0800
Received: from list4.u.washington.edu (list4.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.167])
by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with ESMTP id g0HHAHmT012438;
Thu, 17 Jan 2002 09:10:17 -0800
Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13])
by list4.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.10) with SMTP id g0HH9mb21126;
Thu, 17 Jan 2002 09:09:48 -0800
Received: from mailscan5.cac.washington.edu (mailscan5.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.14])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.10) with SMTP id g0HH8rK22280
for <
[email protected]>; Thu, 17 Jan 2002 09:08:53 -0800
Received: FROM mxu1.u.washington.edu BY mailscan5.cac.washington.edu ; Thu Jan 17 09:07:09 2002 -0800
Received: from andrew.triumf.ca (andrew.Triumf.CA [142.90.106.59])
by mxu1.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with ESMTP id g0HH78pj002444
for <
[email protected]>; Thu, 17 Jan 2002 09:07:08 -0800
Received: from localhost (IDENT:andrew@localhost [127.0.0.1])
by andrew.triumf.ca (8.10.2/8.10.2) with ESMTP id g0HH73g10924
for <
[email protected]>; Thu, 17 Jan 2002 09:07:03 -0800
Message-Id: <
[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2002 09:07:03 -0800 (PST)
Reply-To: Andrew Daviel <
[email protected]>
Sender:
[email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <
http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:
[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:
[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:
[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:
[email protected]>
From: Andrew Daviel <
[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <
[email protected]>
Subject: support for "broken" text/html
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-To: Pine Discussion Forum <
[email protected]>
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN
Status: O
X-Status:
X-Keywords:
X-UID: 64
I'd like to see support for non-MIME HTML mail. As in an HTTP-like
Subject: whatever
Content-Type: text/html
<doctype .....
etc.
Admittedly, most mail I get like this is spam, but there is one
newsletter I'm subscribed to comes like this. Ideally I could get them to
mend their ways, but in practice it's difficult.
I'm not even sure whether this is officially allowed or forbidden.
I know that MIME-Version is required for MIME, which I normally associate
with multipart/alternative etc., but I'm not sure whether HTML sent
as the message body with no encoding should require it.
--
Andrew Daviel, TRIUMF, Canada
Tel. +1 (604) 222-7376
[email protected]
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------
For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see:
http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/
-----------------------------------------------------------------
From
[email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <
[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 17 Jan 2002 12:25:43 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <
[email protected]>
Received: from mailscan1.cac.washington.edu (mailscan1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.16])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with SMTP id g0HKPc7i022312
for <
[email protected]>; Thu, 17 Jan 2002 12:25:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: FROM mx1.cac.washington.edu BY mailscan1.cac.washington.edu ; Thu Jan 17 12:25:36 2002 -0800
Received: from list4.u.washington.edu (list4.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.167])
by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with ESMTP id g0HKPZPs019569;
Thu, 17 Jan 2002 12:25:35 -0800
Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13])
by list4.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.10) with SMTP id g0HKP9b25756;
Thu, 17 Jan 2002 12:25:10 -0800
Received: from mailscan5.cac.washington.edu (mailscan5.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.14])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.10) with SMTP id g0HKLkK92974
for <
[email protected]>; Thu, 17 Jan 2002 12:21:47 -0800
Received: FROM mxu4.u.washington.edu BY mailscan5.cac.washington.edu ; Thu Jan 17 12:21:46 2002 -0800
Received: from aslan.narnia.pp.se (aslan.narnia.pp.se [212.247.3.100])
by mxu4.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with ESMTP id g0HKLi37000979
for <
[email protected]>; Thu, 17 Jan 2002 12:21:45 -0800
Received: from localhost (dufberg@localhost)
by aslan.narnia.pp.se (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id g0HKLdt05544;
Thu, 17 Jan 2002 21:21:39 +0100 (CET)
(envelope-from
[email protected])
Message-Id: <
[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2002 21:21:39 +0100 (CET)
Sender:
[email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <
http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:
[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:
[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:
[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:
[email protected]>
From: Mats Dufberg <
[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <
[email protected]>
Subject: Re: support for "broken" text/html
In-Reply-To: <
[email protected]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE
X-To: Andrew Daviel <
[email protected]>
X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum <
[email protected]>
X-message-flag: Tired of your mail client? Get pine!
http://www.washington.edu/pine/
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN
Status: O
X-Status:
X-Keywords:
X-UID: 65
On Jan 17, 2002, 09:07 (-0800) Andrew Daviel <
[email protected]> wrot=
e:
> I know that MIME-Version is required for MIME, which I normally associate
> with multipart/alternative etc., but I'm not sure whether HTML sent
> as the message body with no encoding should require it.
MIME covers many things, among them to be able to define that the mailbody
is not plain text, but HTML. Without proper headers it is not a proper
MIME mail.
Ask the sender to update its system to support MIME properly.
Mats
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Mats Dufberg
[email protected]
Bl=E5arvsgr=E4nd 42 +46-8-38 48 59
SE-162 45 V=E4llingby, Sweden +46-70-258 2588
From
[email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <
[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 17 Jan 2002 13:34:39 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <
[email protected]>
Received: from mailscan2.cac.washington.edu (mailscan2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.16])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with SMTP id g0HLYc7i006960
for <
[email protected]>; Thu, 17 Jan 2002 13:34:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: FROM mx2.cac.washington.edu BY mailscan2.cac.washington.edu ; Thu Jan 17 13:34:36 2002 -0800
Received: from list4.u.washington.edu (list4.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.167])
by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with ESMTP id g0HLYamT020900;
Thu, 17 Jan 2002 13:34:36 -0800
Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13])
by list4.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.10) with SMTP id g0HLY7b13592;
Thu, 17 Jan 2002 13:34:07 -0800
Received: from mailscan6.cac.washington.edu (mailscan6.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.14])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.10) with SMTP id g0HLWxK73894
for <
[email protected]>; Thu, 17 Jan 2002 13:32:59 -0800
Received: FROM mxu4.u.washington.edu BY mailscan6.cac.washington.edu ; Thu Jan 17 13:32:56 2002 -0800
Received: from mhonline.net (cm-24-161-43-0.nycap.rr.com [24.161.43.0])
by mxu4.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with ESMTP id g0HLWs37021933
for <
[email protected]>; Thu, 17 Jan 2002 13:32:55 -0800
Received: from localhost (IDENT:
[email protected] [127.0.0.1])
by mhonline.net (8.11.6/8.11.2) with ESMTP id g0HLWlF11405;
Thu, 17 Jan 2002 16:32:51 -0500
Message-Id: <
[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2002 16:32:47 -0500 (EST)
Sender:
[email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <
http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:
[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:
[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:
[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:
[email protected]>
From: Christopher Fisk <
[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <
[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Frustrating error 553
In-Reply-To: <
[email protected]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-To:
[email protected]
X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum <
[email protected]>
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN
Status: O
X-Status:
X-Keywords:
X-UID: 66
553 errors are often custom errors Admin's put into thier mail servers.
If you call your ISP for technical support and ask what could trigger that
error you may have a better place to look.
Christopher Fisk
On Thu, 17 Jan 2002
[email protected] wrote:
>
>
>I gather that error: 553 covers many sins so it is not in itself diagnostic.
>
>The actual error message is JUST too short for me to figure out what the $*#$%@
>it means:
>
>"[ Mail not sent. Sending error 553: Due to a small error in your Email s]"
>
>It may be "small" but its terminal! HELP
>
>
>
From
[email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <
[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 17 Jan 2002 18:07:59 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <
[email protected]>
Received: from mailscan3.cac.washington.edu (mailscan3.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.15])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with SMTP id g0I27w7i029464
for <
[email protected]>; Thu, 17 Jan 2002 18:07:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: FROM mx1.cac.washington.edu BY mailscan3.cac.washington.edu ; Thu Jan 17 18:07:57 2002 -0800
Received: from list2.u.washington.edu (list2.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.165])
by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with ESMTP id g0I27uPs029942;
Thu, 17 Jan 2002 18:07:56 -0800
Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13])
by list2.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.10) with SMTP id g0I27A421210;
Thu, 17 Jan 2002 18:07:10 -0800
Received: from mailscan3.cac.washington.edu (mailscan3.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.15])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.10) with SMTP id g0I23qK82036
for <
[email protected]>; Thu, 17 Jan 2002 18:03:53 -0800
Received: FROM mxu2.u.washington.edu BY mailscan3.cac.washington.edu ; Thu Jan 17 18:03:52 2002 -0800
Received: from andrew.triumf.ca (andrew.Triumf.CA [142.90.106.59])
by mxu2.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with ESMTP id g0I23qAZ011301
for <
[email protected]>; Thu, 17 Jan 2002 18:03:52 -0800
Received: from localhost (IDENT:andrew@localhost [127.0.0.1])
by andrew.triumf.ca (8.10.2/8.10.2) with ESMTP id g0I23pg22499;
Thu, 17 Jan 2002 18:03:51 -0800
Message-Id: <
[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2002 18:03:51 -0800 (PST)
Reply-To: Andrew Daviel <
[email protected]>
Sender:
[email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <
http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:
[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:
[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:
[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:
[email protected]>
From: Andrew Daviel <
[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <
[email protected]>
Subject: certificate error in Pine 4.44
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-To: Pine Discussion Forum <
[email protected]>
X-Cc: Steven Mcdonald <
[email protected]>
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN
Status: O
X-Status:
X-Keywords:
X-UID: 67
We recently upgraded to Pine 4.44 from RedHat (packaged by RedHat, I
should say :-) ) and started getting an error message connecting to our
server:
There was a failure validating the SSL/TLS certificate for the server
unable to get local issuer certificate
(Our IMAP server works with SSL in Netscape)
I have read the FAQs for Pine and OpenSSL, from which it seems I need
to install the root CA for our cert (Thawte, in this case) on each
client machine. Butr I'm not sure how to do this.
Pine on my RedHat 6.2 box is doing
open("/usr/share/ssl/cert.pem", O_RDONLY) = -1 ENOENT
stat("/usr/share/ssl/certs/ddc328ff.0", 0xbfffb2c8) = -1 ENOENT
I have openssl-0.9.5a.
On another machine with openssl-0.9.6-9 I found a ca-bundle.crt
and the Pine FAQ suggests I need to extract the root certs from this.
..... tap,tap,tap ....
OK, 2 solutions -
Either, get ca-bundle.crt from somewhere (like a recent distro of
OpenSSL) and symlink it to /usr/share/ssl/cert.pem
or get all the root certs from e.g. openssl-0.9.5a/certs/thawteCb.pem
etc., copy them to /usr/share/ssl/certs then run
"c_rehash usr/share/ssl/certs" to make the hashes
--
Andrew Daviel, TRIUMF, Canada
Tel. +1 (604) 222-7376
[email protected]
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------
For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see:
http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/
-----------------------------------------------------------------
From
[email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <
[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Fri, 18 Jan 2002 02:16:22 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <
[email protected]>
Received: from mailscan2.cac.washington.edu (mailscan2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.16])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with SMTP id g0IAGL7i010140
for <
[email protected]>; Fri, 18 Jan 2002 02:16:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: FROM mx2.cac.washington.edu BY mailscan2.cac.washington.edu ; Fri Jan 18 02:16:16 2002 -0800
Received: from list2.u.washington.edu (list2.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.165])
by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with ESMTP id g0IAGGmT004814;
Fri, 18 Jan 2002 02:16:16 -0800
Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13])
by list2.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.10) with SMTP id g0IAFp405688;
Fri, 18 Jan 2002 02:15:51 -0800
Received: from mailscan1.cac.washington.edu (mailscan1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.16])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.10) with SMTP id g0IADeK34344
for <
[email protected]>; Fri, 18 Jan 2002 02:13:40 -0800
Received: FROM mxu2.u.washington.edu BY mailscan1.cac.washington.edu ; Fri Jan 18 02:13:39 2002 -0800
Received: from patan.sun.com (patan.Sun.COM [192.18.98.43])
by mxu2.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with ESMTP id g0IADcAZ018929
for <
[email protected]>; Fri, 18 Jan 2002 02:13:39 -0800
Received: from ms-emuc07-01.Germany.Sun.COM ([129.157.128.14])
by patan.sun.com (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3) with ESMTP id DAA14621
for <
[email protected]>; Fri, 18 Jan 2002 03:13:37 -0700 (MST)
Received: from sr-emuc07-02 (sr-emuc07-02 [129.157.128.21])
by ms-emuc07-01.Germany.Sun.COM (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3/ENSMAIL,v2.1p1) with ESMTP id LAA06676
for <
[email protected]>; Fri, 18 Jan 2002 11:13:36 +0100 (MET)
Message-Id: <Pine.GSO.4.42.0201181111220.778-100000@sr-emuc07-02>
Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2002 11:13:36 +0100 (MET)
Reply-To: Constantin Gonzalez <
[email protected]>
Sender:
[email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <
http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:
[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:
[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:
[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:
[email protected]>
From: Constantin Gonzalez <
[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <
[email protected]>
Subject: ^M in Text attachments
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-X-Sender: constant@sr-emuc07-02
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN
Status: O
X-Status:
X-Keywords:
X-UID: 68
Hi,
yesterday, I innocently edited a text file with vim on a Unix system. After
sending it out as an attachment with Pine, it had added ^Ms in it.
Is there a way to prevent Pine from adding ^Ms to text attachments?
Regards,
Constantin
--
Constantin Gonzalez Sun Microsystems GmbH
Systems Engineer Sonnenallee 1
Technology & Product Consulting 85551 Kirchheim-Heimstetten
Tel.: +49 89/4 60 08-25 91 Federal Republic of Germany
Fax : +49 89/4 60 08-22 22
http://www.sun.de/
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------
For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see:
http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/
-----------------------------------------------------------------
From
[email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <
[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Fri, 18 Jan 2002 04:14:14 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <
[email protected]>
Received: from mailscan1.cac.washington.edu (mailscan1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.16])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with SMTP id g0ICEB7i011444
for <
[email protected]>; Fri, 18 Jan 2002 04:14:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: FROM mx1.cac.washington.edu BY mailscan1.cac.washington.edu ; Fri Jan 18 04:14:07 2002 -0800
Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100])
by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with ESMTP id g0ICE6Ps007553;
Fri, 18 Jan 2002 04:14:06 -0800
Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13])
by list3.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.10) with SMTP id g0ICDjx12968;
Fri, 18 Jan 2002 04:13:45 -0800
Received: from mailscan5.cac.washington.edu (mailscan5.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.14])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.10) with SMTP id g0ICCKK44656
for <
[email protected]>; Fri, 18 Jan 2002 04:12:20 -0800
Received: FROM mxu3.u.washington.edu BY mailscan5.cac.washington.edu ; Fri Jan 18 04:12:19 2002 -0800
Received: from kluk.ebone.net (kluk.ebone.net [195.158.227.210])
by mxu3.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with ESMTP id g0ICCIWn020158
for <
[email protected]>; Fri, 18 Jan 2002 04:12:18 -0800
Received: (from sl@localhost)
by kluk.ebone.net (8.11.3/8.11.3) id g0ICCHM20270;
Fri, 18 Jan 2002 13:12:17 +0100 (CET)
(envelope-from sl)
Message-Id: <
[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2002 13:12:17 +0100 (CET)
Sender:
[email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <
http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:
[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:
[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:
[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:
[email protected]>
From: Steen Linden <
[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <
[email protected]>
Subject: Problems reading Pine attachments in Windows Outlook XP
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-To: <
[email protected]>
X-X-Sender: <
[email protected]>
X-NCC-RegID: dk.ebone
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN
Status: O
X-Status:
X-Keywords:
X-UID: 69
It appears that Outlook for Windows XP has problems with attachments
produced by pine.
The attachments are there and seems to be correctly formated since the
Outlook user is able to save them from the "File" menu and the
attachments are also correctly included if the mail is forwarded back
from Outlook XP to the pine user.
Initially we thought this was due to corruption of the MIME headers
appearing in the body made by some anti-virus filter, but the "boundary"
strings are intact and we've tested with various different Outlook XP
environments.
The problem seems to only appear in Windows Outlook XP, not in Outlook
Express XP, nor Outlook for NT.
I expect it to be a Microsoft problem. However I post this here since
the ubiquity of Microsoft products makes it less likely that Microsoft
or their users will care about it unless several others experience the
same problem.
Has anybody else experienced apparently missing attachments in Outlook
XP or are your pine attachments working perfectly with Outlook XP?
Please let me know.
Pine versions tested are Pine-4.33/FreeBSD-4.3 and PC-Pine-4.33/WinNT
Among the Windows XP versions tested are "Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2627/MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000"
Best wishes
Steen Linden
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------
For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see:
http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/
-----------------------------------------------------------------
From
[email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <
[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Fri, 18 Jan 2002 04:39:54 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <
[email protected]>
Received: from mailscan2.cac.washington.edu (mailscan2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.16])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with SMTP id g0ICdr7i008064
for <
[email protected]>; Fri, 18 Jan 2002 04:39:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: FROM mx1.cac.washington.edu BY mailscan2.cac.washington.edu ; Fri Jan 18 04:39:51 2002 -0800
Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100])
by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with ESMTP id g0ICdpPs007962;
Fri, 18 Jan 2002 04:39:51 -0800
Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13])
by list3.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.10) with SMTP id g0ICdXx21952;
Fri, 18 Jan 2002 04:39:33 -0800
Received: from mailscan1.cac.washington.edu (mailscan1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.16])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.10) with SMTP id g0ICcnK87000
for <
[email protected]>; Fri, 18 Jan 2002 04:38:49 -0800
Received: FROM mxu1.u.washington.edu BY mailscan1.cac.washington.edu ; Fri Jan 18 04:38:45 2002 -0800
Received: from aslan.narnia.pp.se (aslan.narnia.pp.se [212.247.3.100])
by mxu1.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with ESMTP id g0ICchpj018250
for <
[email protected]>; Fri, 18 Jan 2002 04:38:44 -0800
Received: from localhost (dufberg@localhost)
by aslan.narnia.pp.se (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id g0ICccf07101;
Fri, 18 Jan 2002 13:38:39 +0100 (CET)
(envelope-from
[email protected])
Message-Id: <
[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2002 13:38:38 +0100 (CET)
Sender:
[email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <
http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:
[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:
[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:
[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:
[email protected]>
From: Mats Dufberg <
[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <
[email protected]>
Subject: Re: ^M in Text attachments
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.42.0201181111220.778-100000@sr-emuc07-02>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE
X-To: Constantin Gonzalez <
[email protected]>
X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum <
[email protected]>
X-message-flag: Tired of your mail client? Get pine!
http://www.washington.edu/pine/
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN
Status: O
X-Status:
X-Keywords:
X-UID: 70
On Jan 18, 2002, 11:13 (+0100) Constantin Gonzalez <Constantin.Gonzalez@Sun=
=2E..:
> yesterday, I innocently edited a text file with vim on a Unix system. Aft=
er
> sending it out as an attachment with Pine, it had added ^Ms in it.
>
> Is there a way to prevent Pine from adding ^Ms to text attachments?
In the mail each line must be ended by RETURN+LINEFEED. It is up to the
receiving end to change or keep the line endings.
Mats
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Mats Dufberg
[email protected]
Bl=E5arvsgr=E4nd 42 +46-8-38 48 59
SE-162 45 V=E4llingby, Sweden +46-70-258 2588
From
[email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <
[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Fri, 18 Jan 2002 05:03:27 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <
[email protected]>
Received: from mailscan5.cac.washington.edu (mailscan5.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.14])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with SMTP id g0ID3P7i007512
for <
[email protected]>; Fri, 18 Jan 2002 05:03:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: FROM mx2.cac.washington.edu BY mailscan5.cac.washington.edu ; Fri Jan 18 05:03:24 2002 -0800
Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100])
by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with ESMTP id g0ID3NmT007682;
Fri, 18 Jan 2002 05:03:23 -0800
Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13])
by list3.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.10) with SMTP id g0ID2ox13004;
Fri, 18 Jan 2002 05:02:50 -0800
Received: from mailscan6.cac.washington.edu (mailscan6.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.14])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.10) with SMTP id g0ID2EK88348
for <
[email protected]>; Fri, 18 Jan 2002 05:02:14 -0800
Received: FROM mxu1.u.washington.edu BY mailscan6.cac.washington.edu ; Fri Jan 18 05:02:13 2002 -0800
Received: from mail.bellhow.com (fw.bellhow.com [63.121.54.5])
by mxu1.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with ESMTP id g0ID2Dpj020661
for <
[email protected]>; Fri, 18 Jan 2002 05:02:13 -0800
Received: from wgs.apps1.bellhow.com (wgs.apps1.bellhow.com [192.168.70.70])
by mail.bellhow.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id IAA05499;
Fri, 18 Jan 2002 08:02:07 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost (herrick@localhost) by wgs.apps1.bellhow.com (8.8.4/8.8.3) with ESMTP id IAA14536; Fri, 18 Jan 2002 08:02:07 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <
[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2002 08:02:07 -0500 (EST)
Sender:
[email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <
http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:
[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:
[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:
[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:
[email protected]>
From: daniel lance herrick <
[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <
[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Problems reading Pine attachments in Windows Outlook XP
In-Reply-To: <
[email protected]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-To: Steen Linden <
[email protected]>
X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum <
[email protected]>
X-Authentication-Warning: wgs.apps1.bellhow.com: herrick owned process doing -bs
X-Sender:
[email protected]
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN
Status: O
X-Status:
X-Keywords:
X-UID: 71
Check the headers in your message (send a copy to
yourself, save it to a new mailbox, and look at
the mailbox with vi or emacs) - what is the
Content-Type of your attachments? Is it coming out
something like Application/OCTET-STREAM when
something like Image/jpeg would be more helpful?
If so, your system manager has not properly setup
the file mime.types, you can supply ~/.mime.types
- this is the official place for getting values
for Content-Type.
dan
[email protected]
http://www.NationalReform.org/ - Explicitly Christian Politics
Except the Lord keep the city, the watchman waketh, but in vain.
On Fri, 18 Jan 2002, Steen Linden wrote:
>
> It appears that Outlook for Windows XP has problems with attachments
> produced by pine.
>
> The attachments are there and seems to be correctly formated since the
> Outlook user is able to save them from the "File" menu and the
> attachments are also correctly included if the mail is forwarded back
> from Outlook XP to the pine user.
>
> Initially we thought this was due to corruption of the MIME headers
> appearing in the body made by some anti-virus filter, but the "boundary"
> strings are intact and we've tested with various different Outlook XP
> environments.
>
> The problem seems to only appear in Windows Outlook XP, not in Outlook
> Express XP, nor Outlook for NT.
>
> I expect it to be a Microsoft problem. However I post this here since
> the ubiquity of Microsoft products makes it less likely that Microsoft
> or their users will care about it unless several others experience the
> same problem.
>
> Has anybody else experienced apparently missing attachments in Outlook
> XP or are your pine attachments working perfectly with Outlook XP?
> Please let me know.
>
> Pine versions tested are Pine-4.33/FreeBSD-4.3 and PC-Pine-4.33/WinNT
> Among the Windows XP versions tested are "Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2627/MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000"
>
> Best wishes
> Steen Linden
>
>
>
>
> --
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see:
>
http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
>
From
[email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <
[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Fri, 18 Jan 2002 05:43:43 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <
[email protected]>
Received: from mailscan1.cac.washington.edu (mailscan1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.16])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with SMTP id g0IDhf7i009935
for <
[email protected]>; Fri, 18 Jan 2002 05:43:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: FROM mx1.cac.washington.edu BY mailscan1.cac.washington.edu ; Fri Jan 18 05:43:37 2002 -0800
Received: from list4.u.washington.edu (list4.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.167])
by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with ESMTP id g0IDhaPs008954;
Fri, 18 Jan 2002 05:43:36 -0800
Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13])
by list4.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.10) with SMTP id g0IDhEb09808;
Fri, 18 Jan 2002 05:43:14 -0800
Received: from mailscan6.cac.washington.edu (mailscan6.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.14])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.10) with SMTP id g0IDgcK34378
for <
[email protected]>; Fri, 18 Jan 2002 05:42:38 -0800
Received: FROM mxu4.u.washington.edu BY mailscan6.cac.washington.edu ; Fri Jan 18 05:42:37 2002 -0800
Received: from kluk.ebone.net (kluk.ebone.net [195.158.227.210])
by mxu4.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with ESMTP id g0IDga37027234
for <
[email protected]>; Fri, 18 Jan 2002 05:42:36 -0800
Received: (from sl@localhost)
by kluk.ebone.net (8.11.3/8.11.3) id g0IDgWu20356;
Fri, 18 Jan 2002 14:42:32 +0100 (CET)
(envelope-from sl)
Message-Id: <
[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2002 14:42:32 +0100 (CET)
Sender:
[email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <
http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:
[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:
[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:
[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:
[email protected]>
From: Steen Linden <
[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <
[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Problems reading Pine attachments in Windows Outlook XP
In-Reply-To: <
[email protected]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-To: daniel lance herrick <
[email protected]>
X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum <
[email protected]>
X-X-Sender: <
[email protected]>
X-NCC-RegID: dk.ebone
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN
Status: O
X-Status:
X-Keywords:
X-UID: 72
Hi Daniel,
Thanks for your reply, but I don't think the problem is the
Content-Type. As you can see below the MIME headers for
APPLICATION/MSWORD attachments looks perfectly allright.
Best wishes
Steen Linden
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: MULTIPART/Mixed; BOUNDARY="1619078-12662-1011186519=:279"
Content-ID: <
[email protected]>
This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text,
while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools.
Send mail to
[email protected] for more info.
--1619078-12662-1011186519=:279
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=US-ASCII
Content-ID: <
[email protected]>
her er attachments.
--1619078-12662-1011186519=:279
Content-Type: APPLICATION/MSWORD; NAME="FG1.doc"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: BASE64
Content-ID: <
[email protected]>
Content-Description:
Content-Disposition: ATTACHMENT; FILENAME="FG1.doc"
0M8R4KGxGuEAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAPgADAP7/CQAGAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAD
AAAAYAEAAAAAAAAAEAAAYgEAAAEAAAD+////AAAAAF0BAABeAQAAXwEAAP//
////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
.. SNIP ...
--1619078-12662-1011186519=:279
Content-Type: APPLICATION/MSWORD; NAME="annex2.doc"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: BASE64
Content-ID: <
[email protected]>
Content-Description:
Content-Disposition: ATTACHMENT; FILENAME="annex2.doc"
0M8R4KGxGuEAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAPgADAP7/CQAGAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAB
AAAARwAAAAAAAAAAEAAASQAAAAEAAAD+////AAAAAEYAAAD/////////////
////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
.. SNIP ...
From
[email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <
[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Fri, 18 Jan 2002 10:31:56 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <
[email protected]>
Received: from mailscan4.cac.washington.edu (mailscan4.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.15])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with SMTP id g0IIVs7i003319
for <
[email protected]>; Fri, 18 Jan 2002 10:31:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: FROM mx1.cac.washington.edu BY mailscan4.cac.washington.edu ; Fri Jan 18 10:31:53 2002 -0800
Received: from list1.u.washington.edu (list1.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.99])
by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with ESMTP id g0IIVqPs015893;
Fri, 18 Jan 2002 10:31:52 -0800
Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13])
by list1.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.10) with SMTP id g0IIVG528142;
Fri, 18 Jan 2002 10:31:17 -0800
Received: from mailscan2.cac.washington.edu (mailscan2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.16])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.10) with SMTP id g0II3rK60382
for <
[email protected]>; Fri, 18 Jan 2002 10:03:53 -0800
Received: FROM mxu3.u.washington.edu BY mailscan2.cac.washington.edu ; Fri Jan 18 10:03:52 2002 -0800
Received: from uranus.networkwcs.net (uranus.networkwcs.net [204.120.16.7])
by mxu3.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with ESMTP id g0II3qWn015841
for <
[email protected]>; Fri, 18 Jan 2002 10:03:52 -0800
Received: from evv-mer-2.qccinc.com (poc-rt-01.qccinc.com [216.135.4.11])
by uranus.networkwcs.net (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id g0II3SW04929;
Fri, 18 Jan 2002 12:03:28 -0600 (CST)
Message-Id: <Pine.WNT.4.43.0201181202340.1628-100000@evv-mer-2>
Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2002 12:03:28 -0600 (Central Standard Time)
Sender:
[email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <
http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:
[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:
[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:
[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:
[email protected]>
From: Marc Rouleau <
[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <
[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Problems reading Pine attachments in Windows Outlook XP
In-Reply-To: <
[email protected]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-To: Steen Linden <
[email protected]>
X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum <
[email protected]>
X-X-Sender:
[email protected]
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN
Status: O
X-Status:
X-Keywords:
X-UID: 73
I think you probably need to turn on the new (4.33+) quell-content-id
feature.
-- Marc
On Fri, 18 Jan 2002, Steen Linden wrote:
>It appears that Outlook for Windows XP has problems with attachments
>produced by pine.
>
>The attachments are there and seems to be correctly formated since
>the Outlook user is able to save them from the "File" menu and the
>attachments are also correctly included if the mail is forwarded back
>from Outlook XP to the pine user.
>
>Initially we thought this was due to corruption of the MIME headers
>appearing in the body made by some anti-virus filter, but the
>"boundary" strings are intact and we've tested with various different
>Outlook XP environments.
>
>The problem seems to only appear in Windows Outlook XP, not in
>Outlook Express XP, nor Outlook for NT.
>
>I expect it to be a Microsoft problem. However I post this here since
>the ubiquity of Microsoft products makes it less likely that
>Microsoft or their users will care about it unless several others
>experience the same problem.
>
>Has anybody else experienced apparently missing attachments in
>Outlook XP or are your pine attachments working perfectly with
>Outlook XP? Please let me know.
>
>Pine versions tested are Pine-4.33/FreeBSD-4.3 and PC-Pine-4.33/WinNT
>Among the Windows XP versions tested are "Microsoft Outlook, Build
>10.0.2627/MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000"
>
>Best wishes Steen Linden
From
[email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <
[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Fri, 18 Jan 2002 15:26:33 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <
[email protected]>
Received: from mailscan2.cac.washington.edu (mailscan2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.16])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with SMTP id g0INQV7i018440
for <
[email protected]>; Fri, 18 Jan 2002 15:26:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: FROM mx1.cac.washington.edu BY mailscan2.cac.washington.edu ; Fri Jan 18 15:26:27 2002 -0800
Received: from list1.u.washington.edu (list1.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.99])
by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with ESMTP id g0INQRPs024695;
Fri, 18 Jan 2002 15:26:27 -0800
Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13])
by list1.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.10) with SMTP id g0INQ1534746;
Fri, 18 Jan 2002 15:26:01 -0800
Received: from mailscan1.cac.washington.edu (mailscan1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.16])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.10) with SMTP id g0INOnK26574
for <
[email protected]>; Fri, 18 Jan 2002 15:24:49 -0800
Received: FROM mxu3.u.washington.edu BY mailscan1.cac.washington.edu ; Fri Jan 18 15:24:44 2002 -0800
Received: from kluk.ebone.net (kluk.ebone.net [195.158.227.210])
by mxu3.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with ESMTP id g0INOhWn007489
for <
[email protected]>; Fri, 18 Jan 2002 15:24:43 -0800
Received: (from sl@localhost)
by kluk.ebone.net (8.11.3/8.11.3) id g0INOcK20983;
Sat, 19 Jan 2002 00:24:38 +0100 (CET)
(envelope-from sl)
Message-Id: <
[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2002 00:24:38 +0100 (CET)
Sender:
[email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <
http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:
[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:
[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:
[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:
[email protected]>
From: Steen Linden <
[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <
[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Problems reading Pine attachments in Windows Outlook XP
In-Reply-To: <Pine.WNT.4.43.0201181202340.1628-100000@evv-mer-2>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-To: Marc Rouleau <
[email protected]>
X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum <
[email protected]>
X-X-Sender:
[email protected]
X-NCC-RegID: dk.ebone
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN
Status: O
X-Status:
X-Keywords:
X-UID: 74
Hi Marc,
Thanks a lot for the tip about quell-content-id.
Somehow I managed to miss it in the Pine Information Centre even though
it's actually the first thing that pops up if you search for "Outlook
XP". Sorry.
Best wishes
Steen LInden
From
[email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <
[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Fri, 18 Jan 2002 15:59:00 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <
[email protected]>
Received: from mailscan1.cac.washington.edu (mailscan1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.16])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with SMTP id g0INwx7i012799
for <
[email protected]>; Fri, 18 Jan 2002 15:58:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: FROM mx2.cac.washington.edu BY mailscan1.cac.washington.edu ; Fri Jan 18 15:58:57 2002 -0800
Received: from list4.u.washington.edu (list4.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.167])
by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with ESMTP id g0INwvmT025100;
Fri, 18 Jan 2002 15:58:57 -0800
Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13])
by list4.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.10) with SMTP id g0INwYb18886;
Fri, 18 Jan 2002 15:58:34 -0800
Received: from mailscan3.cac.washington.edu (mailscan3.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.15])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.10) with SMTP id g0INu4K06770
for <
[email protected]>; Fri, 18 Jan 2002 15:56:04 -0800
Received: FROM mxu1.u.washington.edu BY mailscan3.cac.washington.edu ; Fri Jan 18 15:56:03 2002 -0800
Received: from mxout1.cac.washington.edu (mxout1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.5])
by mxu1.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with ESMTP id g0INu3pj014984
for <
[email protected]>; Fri, 18 Jan 2002 15:56:03 -0800
Received: from smtp.washington.edu (smtp.washington.edu [140.142.32.12])
by mxout1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with ESMTP id g0INu2UC022968;
Fri, 18 Jan 2002 15:56:02 -0800
Received: from [128.95.135.163] (D-128-95-135-163.dhcp.washington.edu [128.95.135.163])
(authenticated bits=0)
by smtp.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with ESMTP id g0INu1JU018930
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NO);
Fri, 18 Jan 2002 15:56:01 -0800
Message-Id: <Pine.WNT.4.50.0201181554580.1276-100000@hubertw2k2_ndc.nebula.washington.edu>
Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2002 15:56:01 -0800 (Pacific Standard Time)
Sender:
[email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <
http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:
[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:
[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:
[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:
[email protected]>
From: Steve Hubert <
[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <
[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Frustrating error 553
In-Reply-To: <
[email protected]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-To:
[email protected]
X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum <
[email protected]>
X-X-Sender:
[email protected]
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN
Status: O
X-Status:
X-Keywords:
X-UID: 75
Try setting the feature "enable-verbose-smtp-posting" and when after you
type ^X to send but before you say Yes, type ^W for Verbose output.
--
Steve Hubert <
[email protected]>
Networks and Distributed Computing, Univ. of Washington, Seattle
On Thu, 17 Jan 2002
[email protected] wrote:
>
>
> I gather that error: 553 covers many sins so it is not in itself diagnostic.
>
> The actual error message is JUST too short for me to figure out what the $*#$%@
> it means:
>
> "[ Mail not sent. Sending error 553: Due to a small error in your Email s]"
>
> It may be "small" but its terminal! HELP
>
>
>
From
[email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <
[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Fri, 18 Jan 2002 22:47:32 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <
[email protected]>
Received: from mailscan1.cac.washington.edu (mailscan1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.16])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with SMTP id g0J6lU7i024778
for <
[email protected]>; Fri, 18 Jan 2002 22:47:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: FROM mx2.cac.washington.edu BY mailscan1.cac.washington.edu ; Fri Jan 18 22:47:29 2002 -0800
Received: from list4.u.washington.edu (list4.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.167])
by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with ESMTP id g0J6lSmT032262;
Fri, 18 Jan 2002 22:47:29 -0800
Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13])
by list4.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.10) with SMTP id g0J6kqb09366;
Fri, 18 Jan 2002 22:46:53 -0800
Received: from mailscan3.cac.washington.edu (mailscan3.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.15])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.10) with SMTP id g0J6hQK15328
for <
[email protected]>; Fri, 18 Jan 2002 22:43:27 -0800
Received: FROM mxu1.u.washington.edu BY mailscan3.cac.washington.edu ; Fri Jan 18 22:43:22 2002 -0800
Received: from mail1.panix.com (mail1.panix.com [166.84.0.212])
by mxu1.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with ESMTP id g0J6hLpj007432
for <
[email protected]>; Fri, 18 Jan 2002 22:43:22 -0800
Received: from [192.168.1.100] (localhost.panix.com [127.0.0.1])
by mail1.panix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DFAF48AD1
for <
[email protected]>; Sat, 19 Jan 2002 01:39:02 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <
[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2002 22:39:00 -0800 (PST)
Sender:
[email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <
http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:
[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:
[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:
[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:
[email protected]>
From: Kenneth Crudup <
[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <
[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Frustrating error 553
In-Reply-To: <Pine.WNT.4.50.0201181554580.1276-100000@hubertw2k2_ndc.nebula.washington.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum <
[email protected]>
X-X-Sender:
[email protected]
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN
Status: O
X-Status:
X-Keywords:
X-UID: 76
On Fri, 18 Jan 2002, Steve Hubert wrote:
> Try setting the feature "enable-verbose-smtp-posting" and when after you
> type ^X to send but before you say Yes, type ^W for Verbose output.
Heh. "Verbose" (^W) breaks sending with my SMTP agent.
-Kenny
--
Kenneth R. Crudup Sr. SW Engineer, Scott County Consulting, Washington, D.C.
Home1: PO Box 914 Silver Spring, MD 20910-0914
[email protected]
Home2: 38010 Village Cmn. #217 Fremont, CA 94536-7525 (510) 745-0101
From
[email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <
[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Sat, 19 Jan 2002 17:16:54 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <
[email protected]>
Received: from mailscan6.cac.washington.edu (mailscan6.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.14])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with SMTP id g0K1Gr7i015971
for <
[email protected]>; Sat, 19 Jan 2002 17:16:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: FROM mx2.cac.washington.edu BY mailscan6.cac.washington.edu ; Sat Jan 19 17:16:45 2002 -0800
Received: from list2.u.washington.edu (list2.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.165])
by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with ESMTP id g0K1GjmT016514;
Sat, 19 Jan 2002 17:16:45 -0800
Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13])
by list2.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.10) with SMTP id g0K1GG421262;
Sat, 19 Jan 2002 17:16:16 -0800
Received: from mailscan3.cac.washington.edu (mailscan3.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.15])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.10) with SMTP id g0K1DvK91410
for <
[email protected]>; Sat, 19 Jan 2002 17:13:57 -0800
Received: FROM mxu4.u.washington.edu BY mailscan3.cac.washington.edu ; Sat Jan 19 17:13:54 2002 -0800
Received: from gadolinium.btinternet.com (gadolinium.btinternet.com [194.73.73.111])
by mxu4.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with ESMTP id g0K1Dr37002569
for <
[email protected]>; Sat, 19 Jan 2002 17:13:53 -0800
Received: from host213-122-70-209.btinternet.com ([213.122.70.209])
by gadolinium.btinternet.com with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #8)
id 16S6YR-0006Oi-00
for
[email protected]; Sun, 20 Jan 2002 01:13:52 +0000
Message-Id: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0201200032590.10715-100000@bib>
Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2002 01:16:55 +0000 (GMT)
Sender:
[email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <
http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:
[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:
[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:
[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:
[email protected]>
From: Dan Hatton <
[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <
[email protected]>
Subject: Integer/Pointer Comparison Problem in Pine Compilation
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-Sender: dan@bib
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN
Status: O
X-Status:
X-Keywords:
X-UID: 77
References: 1997.04/msg00006, 2001.07/msg00005, 2001.08/msg00008,
2001.09/msg00033
I've been trying to compile pine 4.33 with gcc 2.95.2-13, under linux
2.2.19pre17, and have the same problem that was discussed in the threads
which started with the pine-info messages mentioned above, i.e. during
compilation of c-client/osdep.c, the compiler dies with complaints about
assignment of a pointer to an integer without an explicit cast.
I've found that if the -traditional flag is given to gcc, via
c-client/Makefile, this suppresses the error. Hopefully, some people
who've encountered the problem will find that this allows them to compile
successfully.
It doesn't do me any good, however, because compilation of the included
system header string2.h then crashes out with "macro or #include recursion
too deep." This appears (I'm not absolutely sure) to be because my
string2.h uses the const keyword, which is incompatible with gcc
-traditional. I understand from one of the earlier threads about the
issue that the next version after 4.33, which turned out to be 4.40, was
supposed to work with the newer gcc version... did this happen, and if so,
where can I get hold of the newer version, bearing in mind that I'm
outside the US, and don't want to break export regulations regarding
encryption software, please?
Thanks
Dan Hatton
================================================================================
Daniel C. Hatton B.A., M.Sci., A.M.Inst.P.
Graduate Student
E-Mail:
[email protected]
World-Wide Web:
http://www.bib.hatton.btinternet.co.uk/dan/
Surface Mail: Wolfson Court,
Girton College,
Clarkson Road,
Cambridge,
UK.
CB3 0EH
================================================================================
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------
For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see:
http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/
-----------------------------------------------------------------
From
[email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <
[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Sun, 20 Jan 2002 15:04:46 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <
[email protected]>
Received: from mailscan4.cac.washington.edu (mailscan4.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.15])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with SMTP id g0KN4i7i025577
for <
[email protected]>; Sun, 20 Jan 2002 15:04:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: FROM mx1.cac.washington.edu BY mailscan4.cac.washington.edu ; Sun Jan 20 15:04:43 2002 -0800
Received: from list2.u.washington.edu (list2.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.165])
by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with ESMTP id g0KN4hPs004546;
Sun, 20 Jan 2002 15:04:43 -0800
Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13])
by list2.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.10) with SMTP id g0KN4B415612;
Sun, 20 Jan 2002 15:04:11 -0800
Received: from mailscan2.cac.washington.edu (mailscan2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.16])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.10) with SMTP id g0KN2qK102024
for <
[email protected]>; Sun, 20 Jan 2002 15:02:52 -0800
Received: FROM mxu4.u.washington.edu BY mailscan2.cac.washington.edu ; Sun Jan 20 15:02:52 2002 -0800
Received: from konichiwa.cc.columbia.edu (konichiwa.cc.columbia.edu [128.59.59.132])
by mxu4.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with ESMTP id g0KN2p37007698
for <
[email protected]>; Sun, 20 Jan 2002 15:02:51 -0800
Received: from localhost by konichiwa.cc.columbia.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id SAA23246;
Sun, 20 Jan 2002 18:02:50 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <Pine.GSO.4.44.0201201756490.16095-100000@konichiwa.cc.columbia.edu>
Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2002 18:02:50 -0500 (EST)
Sender:
[email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <
http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:
[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:
[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:
[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:
[email protected]>
From: Freda B Birnbaum <
[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <
[email protected]>
Subject: compression program
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-Sender:
[email protected]
X-To: Pine Discussion Forum <
[email protected]>
X-Cc: Freda B Birnbaum <
[email protected]>
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN
Status: O
X-Status:
X-Keywords:
X-UID: 78
Is there such a thing as a compression/decompression program that will
work on BOTH a Unix platform AND and Windows (at the DOS prompt)?
I've been using gzip / gunzip to compress / uncompress files on my Unix
account, but obviously if I save the zipped files to the PC, I can't use
gunzip there to unzip them. Of course it takes lots less time to download
zipped files than unzipped ones. But it would be nice to be able to unzip
them on the PC instead of uploading them back to the Unix platform.
The question arises because I use PC-Pine to save old email on the PC (or
ZIP disks). PC-Pine is just terrific for this!
Freda Birnbaum,
[email protected]
"Call on God, but row away from the rocks"
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------
For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see:
http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/
-----------------------------------------------------------------
From
[email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <
[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Sun, 20 Jan 2002 15:13:34 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <
[email protected]>
Received: from mailscan4.cac.washington.edu (mailscan4.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.15])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with SMTP id g0KNDV7i020038
for <
[email protected]>; Sun, 20 Jan 2002 15:13:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: FROM mx2.cac.washington.edu BY mailscan4.cac.washington.edu ; Sun Jan 20 15:13:27 2002 -0800
Received: from list1.u.washington.edu (list1.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.99])
by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with ESMTP id g0KNDQmT003925;
Sun, 20 Jan 2002 15:13:27 -0800
Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13])
by list1.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.10) with SMTP id g0KND8524304;
Sun, 20 Jan 2002 15:13:08 -0800
Received: from mailscan3.cac.washington.edu (mailscan3.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.15])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.10) with SMTP id g0KNCNK44034
for <
[email protected]>; Sun, 20 Jan 2002 15:12:23 -0800
Received: FROM mxu4.u.washington.edu BY mailscan3.cac.washington.edu ; Sun Jan 20 15:12:19 2002 -0800
Received: from mail1.panix.com (mail1.panix.com [166.84.0.212])
by mxu4.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with ESMTP id g0KNCI37008727
for <
[email protected]>; Sun, 20 Jan 2002 15:12:19 -0800
Received: from ProStar.localdomain (localhost.panix.com [127.0.0.1])
by mail1.panix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECFB748CBC
for <
[email protected]>; Sun, 20 Jan 2002 18:09:12 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <
[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2002 15:09:08 -0800 (PST)
Sender:
[email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <
http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:
[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:
[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:
[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:
[email protected]>
From: Kenneth Crudup <
[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <
[email protected]>
Subject: Re: compression program
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.44.0201201756490.16095-100000@konichiwa.cc.columbia.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum <
[email protected]>
X-X-Sender:
[email protected]
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN
Status: O
X-Status:
X-Keywords:
X-UID: 79
On Sun, 20 Jan 2002, Freda B Birnbaum wrote:
> Is there such a thing as a compression/decompression program that will
> work on BOTH a Unix platform AND and Windows (at the DOS prompt)?
Yeah, "pkzip"/"pkunzip". Get it from pkware.com for MS, "freshmeat" for *NIX.
-Kenny
--
Kenneth R. Crudup Sr. SW Engineer, Scott County Consulting, Washington, D.C.
Home1: PO Box 914 Silver Spring, MD 20910-0914
[email protected]
Home2: 38010 Village Cmn. #217 Fremont, CA 94536-7525 (510) 745-0101
From
[email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <
[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Sun, 20 Jan 2002 15:25:32 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <
[email protected]>
Received: from mailscan6.cac.washington.edu (mailscan6.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.14])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with SMTP id g0KNPU7i018916
for <
[email protected]>; Sun, 20 Jan 2002 15:25:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: FROM mx1.cac.washington.edu BY mailscan6.cac.washington.edu ; Sun Jan 20 15:25:29 2002 -0800
Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100])
by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with ESMTP id g0KNPTPs004876;
Sun, 20 Jan 2002 15:25:29 -0800
Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13])
by list3.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.10) with SMTP id g0KNP7x22030;
Sun, 20 Jan 2002 15:25:07 -0800
Received: from mailscan5.cac.washington.edu (mailscan5.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.14])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.10) with SMTP id g0KNOZK06104
for <
[email protected]>; Sun, 20 Jan 2002 15:24:36 -0800
Received: FROM mxu4.u.washington.edu BY mailscan5.cac.washington.edu ; Sun Jan 20 15:24:35 2002 -0800
Received: from konichiwa.cc.columbia.edu (konichiwa.cc.columbia.edu [128.59.59.132])
by mxu4.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with ESMTP id g0KNOY37009875
for <
[email protected]>; Sun, 20 Jan 2002 15:24:34 -0800
Received: from localhost by konichiwa.cc.columbia.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id SAA25875;
Sun, 20 Jan 2002 18:24:31 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <Pine.GSO.4.44.0201201822160.16095-100000@konichiwa.cc.columbia.edu>
Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2002 18:24:31 -0500 (EST)
Sender:
[email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <
http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:
[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:
[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:
[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:
[email protected]>
From: Freda B Birnbaum <
[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <
[email protected]>
Subject: Re: compression program
In-Reply-To: <
[email protected]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-Sender:
[email protected]
X-To: Kenneth Crudup <
[email protected]>
X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum <
[email protected]>
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN
Status: O
X-Status:
X-Keywords:
X-UID: 80
> > Is there such a thing as a compression/decompression program that will
> > work on BOTH a Unix platform AND and Windows (at the DOS prompt)?
>
> Yeah, "pkzip"/"pkunzip". Get it from pkware.com for MS, "freshmeat" for
> *NIX.
Thanks!! (Where do I find "freshmeat"?)
Freda Birnbaum,
[email protected]
"Call on God, but row away from the rocks"
From
[email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <
[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Sun, 20 Jan 2002 15:46:30 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <
[email protected]>
Received: from mailscan6.cac.washington.edu (mailscan6.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.14])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with SMTP id g0KNkT7i014390
for <
[email protected]>; Sun, 20 Jan 2002 15:46:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: FROM mx2.cac.washington.edu BY mailscan6.cac.washington.edu ; Sun Jan 20 15:46:24 2002 -0800
Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100])
by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with ESMTP id g0KNkNmT004450;
Sun, 20 Jan 2002 15:46:23 -0800
Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13])
by list3.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.10) with SMTP id g0KNk3x05938;
Sun, 20 Jan 2002 15:46:03 -0800
Received: from mailscan3.cac.washington.edu (mailscan3.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.15])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.10) with SMTP id g0KNjYK44104
for <
[email protected]>; Sun, 20 Jan 2002 15:45:34 -0800
Received: FROM mxu3.u.washington.edu BY mailscan3.cac.washington.edu ; Sun Jan 20 15:45:31 2002 -0800
Received: from mail2.panix.com (mail2.panix.com [166.84.0.213])
by mxu3.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with ESMTP id g0KNjUWn020376
for <
[email protected]>; Sun, 20 Jan 2002 15:45:31 -0800
Received: from ProStar.localdomain (localhost.panix.com [127.0.0.1])
by mail2.panix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A124B92CD
for <
[email protected]>; Sun, 20 Jan 2002 18:45:29 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <
[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2002 15:45:26 -0800 (PST)
Sender:
[email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <
http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:
[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:
[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:
[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:
[email protected]>
From: Kenneth Crudup <
[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <
[email protected]>
Subject: Re: compression program
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.44.0201201822160.16095-100000@konichiwa.cc.columbia.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum <
[email protected]>
X-X-Sender:
[email protected]
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN
Status: O
X-Status:
X-Keywords:
X-UID: 81
> > > Is there such a thing as a compression/decompression program that will
> > > work on BOTH a Unix platform AND and Windows (at the DOS prompt)?
> > Yeah, "pkzip"/"pkunzip". Get it from pkware.com for MS, "freshmeat" for
> > *NIX.
On Sun, 20 Jan 2002, Freda B Birnbaum wrote:
> Thanks!! (Where do I find "freshmeat"?)
freshmeat.net ; plugin "unzip" and ... ah hell, here's the final URL:
http://www.info-zip.org/pub/infozip/UnZip.html
-Kenny
--
Kenneth R. Crudup Sr. SW Engineer, Scott County Consulting, Washington, D.C.
Home1: PO Box 914 Silver Spring, MD 20910-0914
[email protected]
Home2: 38010 Village Cmn. #217 Fremont, CA 94536-7525 (510) 745-0101
From
[email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <
[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Sun, 20 Jan 2002 15:54:22 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <
[email protected]>
Received: from mailscan6.cac.washington.edu (mailscan6.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.14])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with SMTP id g0KNsK7i023435
for <
[email protected]>; Sun, 20 Jan 2002 15:54:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: FROM mx2.cac.washington.edu BY mailscan6.cac.washington.edu ; Sun Jan 20 15:54:12 2002 -0800
Received: from list1.u.washington.edu (list1.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.99])
by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with ESMTP id g0KNsBmT004567;
Sun, 20 Jan 2002 15:54:12 -0800
Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13])
by list1.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.10) with SMTP id g0KNrq535328;
Sun, 20 Jan 2002 15:53:53 -0800
Received: from mailscan5.cac.washington.edu (mailscan5.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.14])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.10) with SMTP id g0KNrKK136514
for <
[email protected]>; Sun, 20 Jan 2002 15:53:20 -0800
Received: FROM mxu1.u.washington.edu BY mailscan5.cac.washington.edu ; Sun Jan 20 15:53:17 2002 -0800
Received: from protactinium.btinternet.com (protactinium.btinternet.com [194.73.73.176])
by mxu1.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with ESMTP id g0KNrGpj020814
for <
[email protected]>; Sun, 20 Jan 2002 15:53:17 -0800
Received: from host213-122-186-234.btinternet.com ([213.122.186.234])
by protactinium.btinternet.com with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #8)
id 16SRlu-0000Xw-00; Sun, 20 Jan 2002 23:53:12 +0000
Message-Id: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0201202343500.516-100000@bib>
Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2002 23:55:51 +0000 (GMT)
Sender:
[email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <
http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:
[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:
[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:
[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:
[email protected]>
From: Dan Hatton <
[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <
[email protected]>
Subject: Re: compression program
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.44.0201201756490.16095-100000@konichiwa.cc.columbia.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-To: Freda B Birnbaum <
[email protected]>
X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum <
[email protected]>
X-Sender: dan@bib
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN
Status: O
X-Status:
X-Keywords:
X-UID: 82
gzip is available for DOS from
http://www.gzip.org/
Something to watch out for: the way my DOS gzip is installed, which was
the default, the uncompress command in the as-installed state is gzip -d,
or gunzip -d, not plain gunzip.
Dan Hatton
================================================================================
Daniel C. Hatton B.A., M.Sci., A.M.Inst.P.
Graduate Student
E-Mail:
[email protected]
World-Wide Web:
http://www.bib.hatton.btinternet.co.uk/dan/
Surface Mail: Wolfson Court,
Girton College,
Clarkson Road,
Cambridge,
UK.
CB3 0EH
================================================================================
On Sun, 20 Jan 2002, Freda B Birnbaum wrote:
> Is there such a thing as a compression/decompression program that will
> work on BOTH a Unix platform AND and Windows (at the DOS prompt)?
> I've been using gzip / gunzip to compress / uncompress files on my Unix
> account, but obviously if I save the zipped files to the PC, I can't use
> gunzip there to unzip them.
From
[email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <
[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Sun, 20 Jan 2002 16:12:12 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <
[email protected]>
Received: from mailscan3.cac.washington.edu (mailscan3.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.15])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with SMTP id g0L0CB7i010496
for <
[email protected]>; Sun, 20 Jan 2002 16:12:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: FROM mx2.cac.washington.edu BY mailscan3.cac.washington.edu ; Sun Jan 20 16:12:05 2002 -0800
Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100])
by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with ESMTP id g0L0C5mT004820;
Sun, 20 Jan 2002 16:12:05 -0800
Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13])
by list3.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.10) with SMTP id g0L0Bax13804;
Sun, 20 Jan 2002 16:11:36 -0800
Received: from mailscan4.cac.washington.edu (mailscan4.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.15])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.10) with SMTP id g0L0ApK136544
for <
[email protected]>; Sun, 20 Jan 2002 16:10:51 -0800
Received: FROM mxu3.u.washington.edu BY mailscan4.cac.washington.edu ; Sun Jan 20 16:10:50 2002 -0800
Received: from tao.agoron.com (tao.agoron.com [206.181.233.66])
by mxu3.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with ESMTP id g0L0AoWn022578
for <
[email protected]>; Sun, 20 Jan 2002 16:10:50 -0800
Received: from localhost (andy@localhost)
by tao.agoron.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id TAA04249;
Sun, 20 Jan 2002 19:10:49 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <
[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2002 19:10:49 -0500 (EST)
Sender:
[email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <
http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:
[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:
[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:
[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:
[email protected]>
From: Andy Malato <
[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <
[email protected]>
Subject: Re: compression program
In-Reply-To: <
[email protected]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-To: Kenneth Crudup <
[email protected]>
X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum <
[email protected]>
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN
Status: O
X-Status:
X-Keywords:
X-UID: 83
gzip is also available for Windows, try installing cygwin..
---Andy
> On Sun, 20 Jan 2002, Freda B Birnbaum wrote:
>
> > Is there such a thing as a compression/decompression program that will
> > work on BOTH a Unix platform AND and Windows (at the DOS prompt)?
>
> Yeah, "pkzip"/"pkunzip". Get it from pkware.com for MS, "freshmeat" for *NIX.
>
> -Kenny
>
> --
> Kenneth R. Crudup Sr. SW Engineer, Scott County Consulting, Washington, D.C.
> Home1: PO Box 914 Silver Spring, MD 20910-0914
[email protected]
> Home2: 38010 Village Cmn. #217 Fremont, CA 94536-7525 (510) 745-0101
>
From
[email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <
[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Sun, 20 Jan 2002 16:19:18 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <
[email protected]>
Received: from mailscan4.cac.washington.edu (mailscan4.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.15])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with SMTP id g0L0JG7i006708
for <
[email protected]>; Sun, 20 Jan 2002 16:19:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: FROM mx2.cac.washington.edu BY mailscan4.cac.washington.edu ; Sun Jan 20 16:19:09 2002 -0800
Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100])
by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with ESMTP id g0L0J9mT004940;
Sun, 20 Jan 2002 16:19:09 -0800
Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13])
by list3.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.10) with SMTP id g0L0Ipx05986;
Sun, 20 Jan 2002 16:18:52 -0800
Received: from mailscan3.cac.washington.edu (mailscan3.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.15])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.10) with SMTP id g0L0IHK24870
for <
[email protected]>; Sun, 20 Jan 2002 16:18:17 -0800
Received: FROM mxu2.u.washington.edu BY mailscan3.cac.washington.edu ; Sun Jan 20 16:18:16 2002 -0800
Received: from konichiwa.cc.columbia.edu (konichiwa.cc.columbia.edu [128.59.59.132])
by mxu2.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with ESMTP id g0L0IGAZ018452
for <
[email protected]>; Sun, 20 Jan 2002 16:18:16 -0800
Received: from localhost by konichiwa.cc.columbia.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id TAA01363;
Sun, 20 Jan 2002 19:18:14 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <Pine.GSO.4.44.0201201917410.16095-100000@konichiwa.cc.columbia.edu>
Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2002 19:18:14 -0500 (EST)
Sender:
[email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <
http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:
[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:
[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:
[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:
[email protected]>
From: Freda B Birnbaum <
[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <
[email protected]>
Subject: Re: compression program
In-Reply-To: <
[email protected]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-Sender:
[email protected]
X-To: Kenneth Crudup <
[email protected]>
X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum <
[email protected]>,
Freda B Birnbaum <
[email protected]>
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN
Status: O
X-Status:
X-Keywords:
X-UID: 84
> > Thanks!! (Where do I find "freshmeat"?)
>
> freshmeat.net ; plugin "unzip" and ... ah hell, here's the final URL:
>
>
http://www.info-zip.org/pub/infozip/UnZip.html
THANK you!!
From
[email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <
[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Sun, 20 Jan 2002 16:20:29 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <
[email protected]>
Received: from mailscan1.cac.washington.edu (mailscan1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.16])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with SMTP id g0L0KR7i028864
for <
[email protected]>; Sun, 20 Jan 2002 16:20:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: FROM mx1.cac.washington.edu BY mailscan1.cac.washington.edu ; Sun Jan 20 16:20:19 2002 -0800
Received: from list4.u.washington.edu (list4.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.167])
by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with ESMTP id g0L0KJPs005663;
Sun, 20 Jan 2002 16:20:19 -0800
Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13])
by list4.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.10) with SMTP id g0L0Jtb29194;
Sun, 20 Jan 2002 16:19:56 -0800
Received: from mailscan6.cac.washington.edu (mailscan6.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.14])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.10) with SMTP id g0L0J8K26360
for <
[email protected]>; Sun, 20 Jan 2002 16:19:08 -0800
Received: FROM mxu3.u.washington.edu BY mailscan6.cac.washington.edu ; Sun Jan 20 16:19:05 2002 -0800
Received: from konichiwa.cc.columbia.edu (konichiwa.cc.columbia.edu [128.59.59.132])
by mxu3.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with ESMTP id g0L0J4Wn023430
for <
[email protected]>; Sun, 20 Jan 2002 16:19:04 -0800
Received: from localhost by konichiwa.cc.columbia.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id TAA01415;
Sun, 20 Jan 2002 19:19:01 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <Pine.GSO.4.44.0201201918350.16095-100000@konichiwa.cc.columbia.edu>
Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2002 19:19:01 -0500 (EST)
Sender:
[email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <
http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:
[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:
[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:
[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:
[email protected]>
From: Freda B Birnbaum <
[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <
[email protected]>
Subject: Re: compression program
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0201202343500.516-100000@bib>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-Sender:
[email protected]
X-To: Dan Hatton <
[email protected]>
X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum <
[email protected]>,
Freda B Birnbaum <
[email protected]>
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN
Status: O
X-Status:
X-Keywords:
X-UID: 85
On Sun, 20 Jan 2002, Dan Hatton wrote:
> gzip is available for DOS from
>
>
http://www.gzip.org/
>
> Something to watch out for: the way my DOS gzip is installed, which was
> the default, the uncompress command in the as-installed state is gzip -d,
> or gunzip -d, not plain gunzip.
Many thanks!!
From
[email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <
[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Sun, 20 Jan 2002 17:23:27 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <
[email protected]>
Received: from mailscan6.cac.washington.edu (mailscan6.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.14])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with SMTP id g0L1NP7i020093
for <
[email protected]>; Sun, 20 Jan 2002 17:23:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: FROM mx1.cac.washington.edu BY mailscan6.cac.washington.edu ; Sun Jan 20 17:23:20 2002 -0800
Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100])
by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with ESMTP id g0L1NKPs006589;
Sun, 20 Jan 2002 17:23:20 -0800
Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13])
by list3.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.10) with SMTP id g0L1Mhx18352;
Sun, 20 Jan 2002 17:22:43 -0800
Received: from mailscan2.cac.washington.edu (mailscan2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.16])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.10) with SMTP id g0L1IQK118908
for <
[email protected]>; Sun, 20 Jan 2002 17:18:27 -0800
Received: FROM mxu1.u.washington.edu BY mailscan2.cac.washington.edu ; Sun Jan 20 17:18:25 2002 -0800
Received: from konichiwa.cc.columbia.edu (konichiwa.cc.columbia.edu [128.59.59.132])
by mxu1.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with ESMTP id g0L1IPpj028604
for <
[email protected]>; Sun, 20 Jan 2002 17:18:25 -0800
Received: from localhost by konichiwa.cc.columbia.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id UAA07229;
Sun, 20 Jan 2002 20:18:22 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <Pine.GSO.4.44.0201202018030.16095-100000@konichiwa.cc.columbia.edu>
Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2002 20:18:22 -0500 (EST)
Sender:
[email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <
http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:
[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:
[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:
[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:
[email protected]>
From: Freda B Birnbaum <
[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <
[email protected]>
Subject: Re: compression program
In-Reply-To: <
[email protected]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-Sender:
[email protected]
X-To: Andy Malato <
[email protected]>
X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum <
[email protected]>
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN
Status: O
X-Status:
X-Keywords:
X-UID: 86
> gzip is also available for Windows, try installing cygwin..
Great, thanks!
From
[email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <
[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Sun, 20 Jan 2002 18:59:13 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <
[email protected]>
Received: from mailscan1.cac.washington.edu (mailscan1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.16])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with SMTP id g0L2xB7i017965
for <
[email protected]>; Sun, 20 Jan 2002 18:59:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: FROM mx2.cac.washington.edu BY mailscan1.cac.washington.edu ; Sun Jan 20 18:59:09 2002 -0800
Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100])
by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with ESMTP id g0L2x9mT007307;
Sun, 20 Jan 2002 18:59:09 -0800
Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13])
by list3.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.10) with SMTP id g0L2wix13598;
Sun, 20 Jan 2002 18:58:45 -0800
Received: from mailscan2.cac.washington.edu (mailscan2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.16])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.10) with SMTP id g0L2t0K120926
for <
[email protected]>; Sun, 20 Jan 2002 18:55:00 -0800
Received: FROM mxu1.u.washington.edu BY mailscan2.cac.washington.edu ; Sun Jan 20 18:54:59 2002 -0800
Received: from equake.geol.vt.edu (equake.geol.vt.edu [128.173.184.42])
by mxu1.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with ESMTP id g0L2sxpj004753
for <
[email protected]>; Sun, 20 Jan 2002 18:54:59 -0800
Received: from localhost (snoke@localhost)
by equake.geol.vt.edu (8.11.4/8.11.4) with ESMTP id g0L2swR19568
for <
[email protected]>; Sun, 20 Jan 2002 21:54:58 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <
[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2002 21:54:57 -0500 (EST)
Sender:
[email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <
http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:
[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:
[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:
[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:
[email protected]>
From: Arthur Snoke <
[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <
[email protected]>
Subject: Re: compression program
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.44.0201201756490.16095-100000@konichiwa.cc.columbia.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum <
[email protected]>
X-Authentication-Warning: equake.geol.vt.edu: snoke owned process doing -bs
X-X-Sender:
[email protected]
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN
Status: O
X-Status:
X-Keywords:
X-UID: 87
The program Winzip can handle both gzip compression and Unix tar
compression on Windows. On a Mac, the Stuffit Expander can also handle
them both.
On many Unix platforms (including Sun Solaris 2.8) the zip and unzip
utilities are installed. Or they can be gotten for any platform from a
Info-ZIP which I got to through the TeX CTAN search engine. (Google would
work as well, I would guess.)
I learned the hard way that gzip and zip are not the same: in particular,
gzip will compress a file usually more efficiently than the unix compress,
but it does not work on directories. zip seems like a comparison of the
Unix tar and gzip (based on just a couple of tests). zip/unzip are based
on what I think is PKZIP format. It is a bit unfortuante that "zip" is
used for two slightly different compression algorithms -- plus the Iomega
drive.
I am preparing software packages whicwill be put on CDs and are intended
to be readable on multiple platforms, which is why I have played with
these different packages. If anyhone differs with what I calim or has any
alternative suggestions, please share.
Arthur Snoke
[email protected]
From
[email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <
[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Sun, 20 Jan 2002 19:09:22 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <
[email protected]>
Received: from mailscan4.cac.washington.edu (mailscan4.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.15])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with SMTP id g0L39J7i004063
for <
[email protected]>; Sun, 20 Jan 2002 19:09:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: FROM mx2.cac.washington.edu BY mailscan4.cac.washington.edu ; Sun Jan 20 19:09:17 2002 -0800
Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100])
by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with ESMTP id g0L39HmT007455;
Sun, 20 Jan 2002 19:09:17 -0800
Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13])
by list3.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.10) with SMTP id g0L38xx16788;
Sun, 20 Jan 2002 19:08:59 -0800
Received: from mailscan1.cac.washington.edu (mailscan1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.16])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.10) with SMTP id g0L35UK100020
for <
[email protected]>; Sun, 20 Jan 2002 19:05:30 -0800
Received: FROM mxu2.u.washington.edu BY mailscan1.cac.washington.edu ; Sun Jan 20 19:05:29 2002 -0800
Received: from konichiwa.cc.columbia.edu (konichiwa.cc.columbia.edu [128.59.59.132])
by mxu2.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with ESMTP id g0L35TAZ032608
for <
[email protected]>; Sun, 20 Jan 2002 19:05:29 -0800
Received: from localhost by konichiwa.cc.columbia.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id WAA18181;
Sun, 20 Jan 2002 22:05:27 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <Pine.GSO.4.44.0201202204060.16095-100000@konichiwa.cc.columbia.edu>
Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2002 22:05:27 -0500 (EST)
Sender:
[email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <
http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:
[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:
[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:
[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:
[email protected]>
From: Freda B Birnbaum <
[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <
[email protected]>
Subject: Re: compression program
In-Reply-To: <
[email protected]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-Sender:
[email protected]
X-To: Arthur Snoke <
[email protected]>
X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum <
[email protected]>,
Freda B Birnbaum <
[email protected]>
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN
Status: O
X-Status:
X-Keywords:
X-UID: 88
On Sun, 20 Jan 2002, Arthur Snoke wrote:
[...]
> I am preparing software packages whicwill be put on CDs and are intended
> to be readable on multiple platforms, which is why I have played with
> these different packages. If anyhone differs with what I calim or has
> any alternative suggestions, please share.
Thanks for the additional info. Do keep us posted!
From
[email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <
[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Mon, 21 Jan 2002 08:15:31 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <
[email protected]>
Received: from mailscan5.cac.washington.edu (mailscan5.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.14])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with SMTP id g0LGFT7i031143
for <
[email protected]>; Mon, 21 Jan 2002 08:15:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: FROM mx2.cac.washington.edu BY mailscan5.cac.washington.edu ; Mon Jan 21 08:15:24 2002 -0800
Received: from list4.u.washington.edu (list4.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.167])
by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with ESMTP id g0LGFNmT019880;
Mon, 21 Jan 2002 08:15:24 -0800
Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13])
by list4.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.10) with SMTP id g0LGEob04480;
Mon, 21 Jan 2002 08:14:50 -0800
Received: from mailscan3.cac.washington.edu (mailscan3.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.15])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.10) with SMTP id g0LGDlK25040
for <
[email protected]>; Mon, 21 Jan 2002 08:13:47 -0800
Received: FROM mxu2.u.washington.edu BY mailscan3.cac.washington.edu ; Mon Jan 21 08:13:47 2002 -0800
Received: from mail2.svr.pol.co.uk (mail2.svr.pol.co.uk [195.92.193.210])
by mxu2.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with ESMTP id g0LGDjAZ006811
for <
[email protected]>; Mon, 21 Jan 2002 08:13:46 -0800
Received: from modem-6.aardvark.dialup.pol.co.uk ([217.134.0.6])
by mail2.svr.pol.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 3.13 #0)
id 16Sh4q-0002eD-00; Mon, 21 Jan 2002 16:13:44 +0000
Message-Id: <Pine.WNT.4.44.0201211607100.-488117@oemcomputer>
Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2002 16:12:32 +0000 (GMT Normalzeit)
Sender:
[email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <
http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:
[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:
[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:
[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:
[email protected]>
From: Nancy McGough <
[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <
[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Problems reading Pine attachments in Windows Outlook XP
In-Reply-To: <Pine.WNT.4.43.0201181202340.1628-100000@evv-mer-2>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-To: Pine Discussion Forum <
[email protected]>
X-Message-Flag: Worried about Outlook viruses? Switch to Mac/Unix/PC Pine! Info @ www.ii.com
X-X-Sender:
[email protected]
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN
Status: O
X-Status:
X-Keywords:
X-UID: 89
On 18 Jan 2002 Marc Rouleau (
[email protected]) wrote:
> I think you probably need to turn on the new (4.33+) quell-content-id
> feature.
FYI, a message about this Microsoft XP Outlook bug was posted to the
"interesting-people" mailing list today. You can read it here...
IP: Microsoft breaks Mime specification
<
http://www.interesting-people.org/archives/interesting-people/200201/msg00199.html>
Nancy
^x
--
ii Main Pine Page: <
http://www.ii.com/internet/messaging/pine/>
Nancy McGough <
http://www.ii.com/> Infinite Ink
--= Sent via Pine 4.44: IMAP, NNTP & ESMTP for Unix/Win/MacOS X =--
From
[email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <
[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Tue, 22 Jan 2002 06:30:47 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <
[email protected]>
Received: from mailscan6.cac.washington.edu (mailscan6.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.14])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with SMTP id g0MEUk7i009261
for <
[email protected]>; Tue, 22 Jan 2002 06:30:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: FROM mx1.cac.washington.edu BY mailscan6.cac.washington.edu ; Tue Jan 22 06:30:44 2002 -0800
Received: from list2.u.washington.edu (list2.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.165])
by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with ESMTP id g0MEUhPs011206;
Tue, 22 Jan 2002 06:30:44 -0800
Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13])
by list2.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.10) with SMTP id g0MEUG419464;
Tue, 22 Jan 2002 06:30:16 -0800
Received: from mailscan4.cac.washington.edu (mailscan4.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.15])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.10) with SMTP id g0MESIK95706
for <
[email protected]>; Tue, 22 Jan 2002 06:28:18 -0800
Received: FROM mxu1.u.washington.edu BY mailscan4.cac.washington.edu ; Tue Jan 22 06:28:14 2002 -0800
Received: from tungsten.btinternet.com (tungsten.btinternet.com [194.73.73.81])
by mxu1.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with ESMTP id g0MESDpj004016
for <
[email protected]>; Tue, 22 Jan 2002 06:28:13 -0800
Received: from host213-122-62-192.btinternet.com ([213.122.62.192])
by tungsten.btinternet.com with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #8)
id 16T1uF-0001RD-00
for
[email protected]; Tue, 22 Jan 2002 14:28:12 +0000
Message-Id: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0201221406420.748-100000@bib>
Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2002 14:31:22 +0000 (GMT)
Sender:
[email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <
http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:
[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:
[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:
[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:
[email protected]>
From: Dan Hatton <
[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <
[email protected]>
Subject: Slow Local Folder Access and Locking
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-Sender: dan@bib
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN
Status: O
X-Status:
X-Keywords:
X-UID: 90
Hi. Please can anyone help me out with the following problem: access to
my local Pine folders, especially write access such as saving messages and
writing fccs, is often very, very slow, with Linux Pine 4.21? This
appears to be partly (maybe wholly) caused by Pine believing that the
folders are locked; about halfway through the delay, it starts counting
down from 285 seconds until it overrides the lock. There is no obvious
reason for the folders to be locked, i.e. no other copy of Pine is running
and no other process is accessing them.
Some possible leads:
The folders were created with PC-Pine 4.21.
The mail folder files are on a vfat filesystem, with consequences:
I do not own the files; they are owned by root, and I get at them
by being in a group with read, write, and execute permissions on
them.
The filesystem does not support symbolic links.
When suggesting solutions, please bear in mind that I am unable to compile
Pine, for the reasons I outlined in message 2002.01/msg00076.
Thanks
Dan Hatton
================================================================================
Daniel C. Hatton B.A., M.Sci., A.M.Inst.P.
Graduate Student
E-Mail:
[email protected]
World-Wide Web:
http://www.bib.hatton.btinternet.co.uk/dan/
Surface Mail: Wolfson Court,
Girton College,
Clarkson Road,
Cambridge,
UK.
CB3 0EH
================================================================================
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------
For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see:
http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/
-----------------------------------------------------------------
From
[email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <
[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Tue, 22 Jan 2002 06:59:27 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <
[email protected]>
Received: from mailscan3.cac.washington.edu (mailscan3.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.15])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with SMTP id g0MExP7i026864
for <
[email protected]>; Tue, 22 Jan 2002 06:59:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: FROM mx2.cac.washington.edu BY mailscan3.cac.washington.edu ; Tue Jan 22 06:59:21 2002 -0800
Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100])
by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with ESMTP id g0MExKmT011036;
Tue, 22 Jan 2002 06:59:21 -0800
Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13])
by list3.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.10) with SMTP id g0MEwwx22104;
Tue, 22 Jan 2002 06:58:58 -0800
Received: from mailscan4.cac.washington.edu (mailscan4.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.15])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.10) with SMTP id g0MEwFK98336
for <
[email protected]>; Tue, 22 Jan 2002 06:58:15 -0800
Received: FROM mxu2.u.washington.edu BY mailscan4.cac.washington.edu ; Tue Jan 22 06:58:14 2002 -0800
Received: from mail1.panix.com (mail1.panix.com [166.84.0.212])
by mxu2.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with ESMTP id g0MEwEAZ024179
for <
[email protected]>; Tue, 22 Jan 2002 06:58:14 -0800
Received: from 209-162-38-182.thegrid.net (localhost.panix.com [127.0.0.1])
by mail1.panix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8EDC489F9
for <
[email protected]>; Tue, 22 Jan 2002 09:55:33 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <
[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2002 06:55:30 -0800 (PST)
Sender:
[email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <
http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:
[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:
[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:
[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:
[email protected]>
From: Kenneth Crudup <
[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <
[email protected]>
Subject: Pine questions (4.4X?)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-X-Sender:
[email protected]
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN
Status: O
X-Status:
X-Keywords:
X-UID: 91
- Is there any way, via keystrokes, to (R)eply to the original poster even
if Reply-to: is set in the message (I don't want to set this in the
config, as 99% of the time I want to use "Reply-To:"
- To have Pine remember the password used when you grab your remote_pinerc
and automatically use that as the login to outgoing SMTP AUTH (currently,
if the server spec differs at all, it won't reuse what it was given)
Thanks,
-Kenny
--
Kenneth R. Crudup Sr. SW Engineer, Scott County Consulting, Washington, D.C.
Home1: PO Box 914 Silver Spring, MD 20910-0914
[email protected]
Home2: 38010 Village Cmn. #217 Fremont, CA 94536-7525 (510) 745-0101
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------
For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see:
http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/
-----------------------------------------------------------------
From
[email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <
[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Tue, 22 Jan 2002 07:44:00 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <
[email protected]>
Received: from mailscan5.cac.washington.edu (mailscan5.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.14])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with SMTP id g0MFhw7i023635
for <
[email protected]>; Tue, 22 Jan 2002 07:43:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: FROM mx1.cac.washington.edu BY mailscan5.cac.washington.edu ; Tue Jan 22 07:43:50 2002 -0800
Received: from list4.u.washington.edu (list4.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.167])
by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with ESMTP id g0MFhoPs012526;
Tue, 22 Jan 2002 07:43:50 -0800
Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13])
by list4.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.10) with SMTP id g0MFhMb23496;
Tue, 22 Jan 2002 07:43:22 -0800
Received: from mailscan5.cac.washington.edu (mailscan5.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.14])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.10) with SMTP id g0MFgWK60536
for <
[email protected]>; Tue, 22 Jan 2002 07:42:32 -0800
Received: FROM mxu1.u.washington.edu BY mailscan5.cac.washington.edu ; Tue Jan 22 07:42:32 2002 -0800
Received: from moultrie.cse.sc.edu ([129.252.138.7])
by mxu1.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with ESMTP id g0MFgVpj016852
for <
[email protected]>; Tue, 22 Jan 2002 07:42:31 -0800
Received: from mum.cse.sc.edu (mum.cse.sc.edu [129.252.138.21])
by moultrie.cse.sc.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53C991FA28
for <
[email protected]>; Tue, 22 Jan 2002 10:42:29 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <
[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2002 10:42:29 -0500 (EST)
Sender:
[email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <
http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:
[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:
[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:
[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:
[email protected]>
From: Gopi Sundaram <
[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <
[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Pine questions (4.4X?)
In-Reply-To: <
[email protected]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-To: Pine Discussion Forum <
[email protected]>
X-X-Sender:
[email protected]
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN
Status: O
X-Status:
X-Keywords:
X-UID: 92
On Tue, 22 Jan 2002, Kenneth Crudup wrote:
> - Is there any way, via keystrokes, to (R)eply to the original
> poster even if Reply-to: is set in the message (I don't want to set
> this in the config, as 99% of the time I want to use "Reply-To:"
Umm, you don't want to use the config option for it, but you still want
the functionality. I can only offer a poor work-around: Before replying
to the message, copy the sender's address into the clipboard, then when
you reply, paste it into the headers.
> - To have Pine remember the password used when you grab your
> remote_pinerc and automatically use that as the login to outgoing
> SMTP AUTH
Use a password file. It will keep separate passwords for each server
definition.
--
Gopi Sundaram
[email protected]
http://www.cse.sc.edu/~gopalan/Pine/
From
[email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <
[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Tue, 22 Jan 2002 07:50:30 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <
[email protected]>
Received: from mailscan6.cac.washington.edu (mailscan6.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.14])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with SMTP id g0MFoS7i006320
for <
[email protected]>; Tue, 22 Jan 2002 07:50:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: FROM mx1.cac.washington.edu BY mailscan6.cac.washington.edu ; Tue Jan 22 07:50:24 2002 -0800
Received: from list1.u.washington.edu (list1.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.99])
by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with ESMTP id g0MFoNPs012674;
Tue, 22 Jan 2002 07:50:23 -0800
Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13])
by list1.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.10) with SMTP id g0MFnK545474;
Tue, 22 Jan 2002 07:49:25 -0800
Received: from mailscan4.cac.washington.edu (mailscan4.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.15])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.10) with SMTP id g0MFmsK131544
for <
[email protected]>; Tue, 22 Jan 2002 07:48:55 -0800
Received: FROM mxu4.u.washington.edu BY mailscan4.cac.washington.edu ; Tue Jan 22 07:48:54 2002 -0800
Received: from mail2.panix.com (mail2.panix.com [166.84.0.213])
by mxu4.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with ESMTP id g0MFmq37003600
for <
[email protected]>; Tue, 22 Jan 2002 07:48:54 -0800
Received: from 209-162-38-182.thegrid.net (localhost.panix.com [127.0.0.1])
by mail2.panix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 317489156
for <
[email protected]>; Tue, 22 Jan 2002 10:48:51 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <
[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2002 07:48:45 -0800 (PST)
Sender:
[email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <
http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:
[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:
[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:
[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:
[email protected]>
From: Kenneth Crudup <
[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <
[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Pine questions (4.4X?)
In-Reply-To: <
[email protected]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum <
[email protected]>
X-X-Sender:
[email protected]
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN
Status: O
X-Status:
X-Keywords:
X-UID: 93
On Tue, 22 Jan 2002, Gopi Sundaram wrote:
> Before replying to the message, copy the sender's address into the
> clipboard, then when you reply, paste it into the headers.
Yeah, that's what I'd been doing before I RTFMed, and coming up empty,
tried here. Perhaps say, ^B (I think it's free) could be used to implement
this?
> > - To have Pine remember the password used when you grab your
> > remote_pinerc and automatically use that as the login to outgoing
> > SMTP AUTH
> Use a password file.
I don't use PC-Pine- where's this in the 4.4X *NIX distro?
-Kenny
--
Kenneth R. Crudup Sr. SW Engineer, Scott County Consulting, Washington, D.C.
Home1: PO Box 914 Silver Spring, MD 20910-0914
[email protected]
Home2: 38010 Village Cmn. #217 Fremont, CA 94536-7525 (510) 745-0101
From
[email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <
[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Tue, 22 Jan 2002 09:33:38 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <
[email protected]>
Received: from mailscan6.cac.washington.edu (mailscan6.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.14])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with SMTP id g0MHXa7i026430
for <
[email protected]>; Tue, 22 Jan 2002 09:33:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: FROM mx2.cac.washington.edu BY mailscan6.cac.washington.edu ; Tue Jan 22 09:33:34 2002 -0800
Received: from list2.u.washington.edu (list2.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.165])
by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with ESMTP id g0MHXXmT014989;
Tue, 22 Jan 2002 09:33:34 -0800
Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13])
by list2.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.10) with SMTP id g0MHWN415664;
Tue, 22 Jan 2002 09:32:24 -0800
Received: from mailscan5.cac.washington.edu (mailscan5.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.14])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.10) with SMTP id g0MHTrK128566
for <
[email protected]>; Tue, 22 Jan 2002 09:29:53 -0800
Received: FROM mxu4.u.washington.edu BY mailscan5.cac.washington.edu ; Tue Jan 22 09:29:51 2002 -0800
Received: from mail.bellhow.com (fw.bellhow.com [63.121.54.5])
by mxu4.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with ESMTP id g0MHTo37000721
for <
[email protected]>; Tue, 22 Jan 2002 09:29:50 -0800
Received: from wgs.apps1.bellhow.com (wgs.apps1.bellhow.com [192.168.70.70])
by mail.bellhow.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA27400;
Tue, 22 Jan 2002 12:29:44 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost (herrick@localhost) by wgs.apps1.bellhow.com (8.8.4/8.8.3) with ESMTP id MAA07868; Tue, 22 Jan 2002 12:29:43 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <
[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2002 12:29:43 -0500 (EST)
Sender:
[email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <
http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:
[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:
[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:
[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:
[email protected]>
From: daniel lance herrick <
[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <
[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Pine questions (4.4X?)
In-Reply-To: <
[email protected]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-To: Gopi Sundaram <
[email protected]>
X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum <
[email protected]>
X-Authentication-Warning: wgs.apps1.bellhow.com: herrick owned process doing -bs
X-Sender:
[email protected]
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN
Status: O
X-Status:
X-Keywords:
X-UID: 94
On Tue, 22 Jan 2002, Gopi Sundaram wrote:
> On Tue, 22 Jan 2002, Kenneth Crudup wrote:
>
> > - Is there any way, via keystrokes, to (R)eply to the original
> > poster even if Reply-to: is set in the message (I don't want to set
> > this in the config, as 99% of the time I want to use "Reply-To:"
> Umm, you don't want to use the config option for it, but you still want
> the functionality. I can only offer a poor work-around: Before replying
> to the message, copy the sender's address into the clipboard, then when
> you reply, paste it into the headers.
I don't understand.
I'm using 4.21 on Solaris.
When I "r" Reply to a message with a
Reply-To: header, pine asks if I want to use the
Reply-To addresse instead of the Sender address
before asking me if I want to Reply to everyone
who saw the first message.
Answering "n" No to that question sends the reply
to only the singular sender, unless I then answer
"y" yes to the reply to all question.
Was that feature removed later?
dan
[email protected]
http://www.NationalReform.org/ - Explicitly Christian Politics
Except the Lord keep the city, the watchman waketh, but in vain.
From
[email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <
[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Tue, 22 Jan 2002 09:50:48 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <
[email protected]>
Received: from mailscan1.cac.washington.edu (mailscan1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.16])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with SMTP id g0MHok7i005234
for <
[email protected]>; Tue, 22 Jan 2002 09:50:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: FROM mx2.cac.washington.edu BY mailscan1.cac.washington.edu ; Tue Jan 22 09:50:38 2002 -0800
Received: from list4.u.washington.edu (list4.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.167])
by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with ESMTP id g0MHobmT015561;
Tue, 22 Jan 2002 09:50:38 -0800
Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13])
by list4.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.10) with SMTP id g0MHoGb21102;
Tue, 22 Jan 2002 09:50:17 -0800
Received: from mailscan2.cac.washington.edu (mailscan2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.16])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.10) with SMTP id g0MHneK06656
for <
[email protected]>; Tue, 22 Jan 2002 09:49:41 -0800
Received: FROM mxu4.u.washington.edu BY mailscan2.cac.washington.edu ; Tue Jan 22 09:49:40 2002 -0800
Received: from moultrie.cse.sc.edu ([129.252.138.7])
by mxu4.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with ESMTP id g0MHne37007708
for <
[email protected]>; Tue, 22 Jan 2002 09:49:40 -0800
Received: from mum.cse.sc.edu (mum.cse.sc.edu [129.252.138.21])
by moultrie.cse.sc.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBBA01FA34
for <
[email protected]>; Tue, 22 Jan 2002 12:49:35 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <
[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2002 12:49:35 -0500 (EST)
Sender:
[email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <
http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:
[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:
[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:
[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:
[email protected]>
From: Gopi Sundaram <
[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <
[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Pine questions (4.4X?)
In-Reply-To: <
[email protected]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-To: Pine Discussion Forum <
[email protected]>
X-X-Sender:
[email protected]
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN
Status: O
X-Status:
X-Keywords:
X-UID: 95
On Tue, 22 Jan 2002, daniel lance herrick wrote:
> When I "r" Reply to a message with a Reply-To: header, pine asks if
> I want to use the Reply-To addresse instead of the Sender address
You can choose to always use the Reply-To: header by selecting the
following under (M)ain (S)etup (C)onfig:
[X] reply-always-uses-reply-to
That's what the OP had an issue with. He wanted an exception keystroke.
--
Gopi Sundaram
[email protected]
http://www.cse.sc.edu/~gopalan/Pine/
From
[email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <
[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Tue, 22 Jan 2002 09:53:33 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <
[email protected]>
Received: from mailscan5.cac.washington.edu (mailscan5.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.14])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with SMTP id g0MHrP7i005944
for <
[email protected]>; Tue, 22 Jan 2002 09:53:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: FROM mx1.cac.washington.edu BY mailscan5.cac.washington.edu ; Tue Jan 22 09:53:19 2002 -0800
Received: from list4.u.washington.edu (list4.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.167])
by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with ESMTP id g0MHrIPs016169;
Tue, 22 Jan 2002 09:53:18 -0800
Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13])
by list4.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.10) with SMTP id g0MHgqb16344;
Tue, 22 Jan 2002 09:42:52 -0800
Received: from mailscan1.cac.washington.edu (mailscan1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.16])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.10) with SMTP id g0MHg1K73606
for <
[email protected]>; Tue, 22 Jan 2002 09:42:02 -0800
Received: FROM mxu2.u.washington.edu BY mailscan1.cac.washington.edu ; Tue Jan 22 09:42:01 2002 -0800
Received: from mail3.panix.com (mail3.panix.com [166.84.0.167])
by mxu2.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with ESMTP id g0MHg0AZ000804
for <
[email protected]>; Tue, 22 Jan 2002 09:42:00 -0800
Received: from 209-162-38-182.thegrid.net (localhost.panix.com [127.0.0.1])
by mail3.panix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D065E981CD
for <
[email protected]>; Tue, 22 Jan 2002 12:41:58 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <
[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2002 09:41:54 -0800 (PST)
Sender:
[email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <
http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:
[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:
[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:
[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:
[email protected]>
From: Kenneth Crudup <
[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <
[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Pine questions (4.4X?)
In-Reply-To: <
[email protected]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum <
[email protected]>
X-X-Sender:
[email protected]
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN
Status: O
X-Status:
X-Keywords:
X-UID: 96
On Tue, 22 Jan 2002, daniel lance herrick wrote:
> Answering "n" No to that question sends the reply
> to only the singular sender, unless I then answer
> "y" yes to the reply to all question.
> Was that feature removed later?
The only option I saw in 4.4X was to change the behavior of Pine to either/or
send to all/send to one; didn't appear to prompt me.
-Kenny
--
Kenneth R. Crudup Sr. SW Engineer, Scott County Consulting, Washington, D.C.
Home1: PO Box 914 Silver Spring, MD 20910-0914
[email protected]
Home2: 38010 Village Cmn. #217 Fremont, CA 94536-7525 (510) 745-0101
From
[email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <
[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Tue, 22 Jan 2002 09:56:24 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <
[email protected]>
Received: from mailscan1.cac.washington.edu (mailscan1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.16])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with SMTP id g0MHuL7i009913
for <
[email protected]>; Tue, 22 Jan 2002 09:56:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: FROM mx1.cac.washington.edu BY mailscan1.cac.washington.edu ; Tue Jan 22 09:56:19 2002 -0800
Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100])
by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with ESMTP id g0MHuJPs016270;
Tue, 22 Jan 2002 09:56:19 -0800
Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13])
by list3.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.10) with SMTP id g0MHtvx21328;
Tue, 22 Jan 2002 09:55:57 -0800
Received: from mailscan6.cac.washington.edu (mailscan6.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.14])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.10) with SMTP id g0MHtKK30396
for <
[email protected]>; Tue, 22 Jan 2002 09:55:20 -0800
Received: FROM mxu2.u.washington.edu BY mailscan6.cac.washington.edu ; Tue Jan 22 09:55:20 2002 -0800
Received: from moultrie.cse.sc.edu ([129.252.138.7])
by mxu2.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with ESMTP id g0MHtJAZ005264
for <
[email protected]>; Tue, 22 Jan 2002 09:55:20 -0800
Received: from mum.cse.sc.edu (mum.cse.sc.edu [129.252.138.21])
by moultrie.cse.sc.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 579EF1FA28
for <
[email protected]>; Tue, 22 Jan 2002 12:55:19 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <
[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2002 12:55:19 -0500 (EST)
Sender:
[email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <
http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:
[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:
[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:
[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:
[email protected]>
From: Gopi Sundaram <
[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <
[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Pine questions (4.4X?)
In-Reply-To: <
[email protected]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-To: Pine Discussion Forum <
[email protected]>
X-X-Sender:
[email protected]
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN
Status: O
X-Status:
X-Keywords:
X-UID: 97
On Tue, 22 Jan 2002, Kenneth Crudup wrote (quoting me):
>> Use a password file.
>
> I don't use PC-Pine- where's this in the 4.4X *NIX distro?
You have to enable this during compilation. Read the Pine tech-notes:
<
http://www.washington.edu/pine/tech-notes/installation.html#pine-compile>
Specifically, look at the definition for PASSFILE.
The compile-time definition should be done in pine/pine.h. search in
that file for the PASSFILE definition. It will be either commented out
or #undef'd. Edit that line.
--
Gopi Sundaram
[email protected]
http://www.cse.sc.edu/~gopalan/Pine/
From
[email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <
[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Tue, 22 Jan 2002 10:01:31 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <
[email protected]>
Received: from mailscan6.cac.washington.edu (mailscan6.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.14])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with SMTP id g0MI1Q7i005056
for <
[email protected]>; Tue, 22 Jan 2002 10:01:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: FROM mx1.cac.washington.edu BY mailscan6.cac.washington.edu ; Tue Jan 22 10:01:17 2002 -0800
Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100])
by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with ESMTP id g0MI1HPs016452;
Tue, 22 Jan 2002 10:01:17 -0800
Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13])
by list3.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.10) with SMTP id g0MI0jx05976;
Tue, 22 Jan 2002 10:00:45 -0800
Received: from mailscan5.cac.washington.edu (mailscan5.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.14])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.10) with SMTP id g0MHxKK44032
for <
[email protected]>; Tue, 22 Jan 2002 09:59:20 -0800
Received: FROM mxu4.u.washington.edu BY mailscan5.cac.washington.edu ; Tue Jan 22 09:59:19 2002 -0800
Received: from mail2.panix.com (mail2.panix.com [166.84.0.213])
by mxu4.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with ESMTP id g0MHxI37011203
for <
[email protected]>; Tue, 22 Jan 2002 09:59:18 -0800
Received: from 209-162-38-182.thegrid.net (localhost.panix.com [127.0.0.1])
by mail2.panix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D80E8EA3
for <
[email protected]>; Tue, 22 Jan 2002 12:59:16 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <
[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2002 09:59:10 -0800 (PST)
Sender:
[email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <
http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:
[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:
[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:
[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:
[email protected]>
From: Kenneth Crudup <
[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <
[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Pine questions (4.4X?)
In-Reply-To: <
[email protected]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum <
[email protected]>
X-X-Sender:
[email protected]
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN
Status: O
X-Status:
X-Keywords:
X-UID: 98
On Tue, 22 Jan 2002, Gopi Sundaram wrote:
> You have to enable this during compilation.
Thanks.
-Kenny
--
Kenneth R. Crudup Sr. SW Engineer, Scott County Consulting, Washington, D.C.
Home1: PO Box 914 Silver Spring, MD 20910-0914
[email protected]
Home2: 38010 Village Cmn. #217 Fremont, CA 94536-7525 (510) 745-0101
From
[email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <
[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Tue, 22 Jan 2002 17:30:12 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <
[email protected]>
Received: from mailscan2.cac.washington.edu (mailscan2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.16])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with SMTP id g0N1UA7i002057
for <
[email protected]>; Tue, 22 Jan 2002 17:30:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: FROM mx1.cac.washington.edu BY mailscan2.cac.washington.edu ; Tue Jan 22 17:30:09 2002 -0800
Received: from list4.u.washington.edu (list4.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.167])
by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with ESMTP id g0N1U8Ps032156;
Tue, 22 Jan 2002 17:30:09 -0800
Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13])
by list4.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.10) with SMTP id g0N1Tdb09714;
Tue, 22 Jan 2002 17:29:40 -0800
Received: from mailscan5.cac.washington.edu (mailscan5.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.14])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.10) with SMTP id g0N0UhK122050
for <
[email protected]>; Tue, 22 Jan 2002 16:32:52 -0800
Received: FROM mxu2.u.washington.edu BY mailscan5.cac.washington.edu ; Tue Jan 22 16:29:36 2002 -0800
Received: from genie.gene.com (genie-open.gene.com [192.12.78.1])
by mxu2.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with ESMTP id g0N0TZAZ004569
for <
[email protected]>; Tue, 22 Jan 2002 16:29:36 -0800
Received: from gene.com (tallac.gene.com [128.137.116.213])
by genie.gene.com (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id g0N0TZL80679
for <
[email protected]>; Tue, 22 Jan 2002 16:29:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (rkh@localhost)
by gene.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g0N0TYE06908
for <
[email protected]>; Tue, 22 Jan 2002 16:29:34 -0800
Message-Id: <
[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2002 16:29:34 -0800 (PST)
Reply-To:
[email protected]
Sender:
[email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <
http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:
[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:
[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:
[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:
[email protected]>
From:
[email protected]
To: Pine Discussion Forum <
[email protected]>
Subject: pine + ldap returns user`@missing-hostname'
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-Sender: Reece Hart <
[email protected]@gene.com>
X-Mailer-Is-Bogus: X-Mailer was forged for authentication
X-Attribution: reece
X-URL:
http://www.in-machina.com/~reece/
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN
Status: O
X-Status:
X-Keywords:
X-UID: 99
Muller, Lin, & pine-info list-
Many months ago, both of you posted regarding problems using ldap with
pine which resulted in email addresses to user@`missing-hostname'. I have
the same problem with the current Pine 4.44 (and prior versions) and I
haven't been able to find a solution myself or in newsgroups.
Did either of you ever figure this out?
Thanks,
Reece
--
Reece Hart, Ph.D.
[email protected],
http://www.gene.com/
Genentech, Inc. 650/225-6133 (voice), -5389 (fax)
Bioinformatics Department
1 DNA Way, MS-93
http://www.in-machina.com/~reece/
South San Francisco, CA 94080-4990
[email protected], GPG: 0x25EC91A0
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------
For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see:
http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/
-----------------------------------------------------------------
From
[email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <
[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Tue, 22 Jan 2002 18:20:20 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <
[email protected]>
Received: from mailscan2.cac.washington.edu (mailscan2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.16])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with SMTP id g0N2KJ7i017618
for <
[email protected]>; Tue, 22 Jan 2002 18:20:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: FROM mx1.cac.washington.edu BY mailscan2.cac.washington.edu ; Tue Jan 22 18:20:17 2002 -0800
Received: from list4.u.washington.edu (list4.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.167])
by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with ESMTP id g0N2KHPs001039;
Tue, 22 Jan 2002 18:20:17 -0800
Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13])
by list4.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.10) with SMTP id g0N2Jvb17176;
Tue, 22 Jan 2002 18:19:57 -0800
Received: from mailscan6.cac.washington.edu (mailscan6.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.14])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.10) with SMTP id g0N2JNK123914
for <
[email protected]>; Tue, 22 Jan 2002 18:19:23 -0800
Received: FROM mxu1.u.washington.edu BY mailscan6.cac.washington.edu ; Tue Jan 22 18:19:20 2002 -0800
Received: from soda.csua.berkeley.edu (soda.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU [128.32.247.226])
by mxu1.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with ESMTP id g0N2JJpj021737
for <
[email protected]>; Tue, 22 Jan 2002 18:19:19 -0800
Received: from localhost (tonytung@localhost)
by soda.csua.berkeley.edu (8.11.6/8.11.4) with ESMTP id g0N2JJ116825
for <
[email protected]>; Tue, 22 Jan 2002 18:19:19 -0800 (PST)
(envelope-from
[email protected])
Message-Id: <
[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2002 18:19:19 -0800 (PST)
Sender:
[email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <
http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:
[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:
[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:
[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:
[email protected]>
From: Tony Tung <
[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <
[email protected]>
Subject: correct for timezone in index format
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-To: Pine Discussion Forum <
[email protected]>
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN
Status: RO
X-Status:
X-Keywords:
X-UID: 100
Hi all,
Is there a way to have pine correct for the timezone when displaying the
date/time in the index? All the date/time tokens appear to not correct
for the timezone. Without such a feature, there are messages that appear
to be arriving from the future :).
Thanks,
Tony
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------
For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see:
http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/
-----------------------------------------------------------------
From
[email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <
[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Wed, 23 Jan 2002 12:51:14 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <
[email protected]>
Received: from mailscan4.cac.washington.edu (mailscan4.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.15])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with SMTP id g0NKpC7i010497
for <
[email protected]>; Wed, 23 Jan 2002 12:51:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: FROM mx2.cac.washington.edu BY mailscan4.cac.washington.edu ; Wed Jan 23 12:51:10 2002 -0800
Received: from list4.u.washington.edu (list4.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.167])
by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with ESMTP id g0NKpAmT025291;
Wed, 23 Jan 2002 12:51:10 -0800
Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13])
by list4.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with SMTP id g0NKnRkG026134;
Wed, 23 Jan 2002 12:49:27 -0800
Received: from mailscan5.cac.washington.edu (mailscan5.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.14])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with SMTP id g0NKlJw6040474
for <
[email protected]>; Wed, 23 Jan 2002 12:47:19 -0800
Received: FROM mxu4.u.washington.edu BY mailscan5.cac.washington.edu ; Wed Jan 23 12:47:19 2002 -0800
Received: from devserv.devel.redhat.com (nat-pool-meridian.redhat.com [12.107.208.200])
by mxu4.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with ESMTP id g0NKlI37019940
for <
[email protected]>; Wed, 23 Jan 2002 12:47:18 -0800
Received: from localhost (mharris@localhost)
by devserv.devel.redhat.com (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id g0NKlFK07699;
Wed, 23 Jan 2002 15:47:15 -0500
Message-Id: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0201231546110.10324-100000@devserv.devel.redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2002 15:47:15 -0500 (EST)
Sender:
[email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <
http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:
[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:
[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:
[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:
[email protected]>
From: "Mike A. Harris" <
[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <
[email protected]>
Subject: Re: compression program
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.44.0201201756490.16095-100000@konichiwa.cc.columbia.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-To: Freda B Birnbaum <
[email protected]>
X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum <
[email protected]>
X-Authentication-Warning: devserv.devel.redhat.com: mharris owned process doing -bs
X-X-Sender: <
[email protected]>
X-Unexpected-Header: The Spanish Inquisition
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN
Status: O
X-Status:
X-Keywords:
X-UID: 101
On Sun, 20 Jan 2002, Freda B Birnbaum wrote:
>Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2002 18:02:50 -0500 (EST)
>From: Freda B Birnbaum <
[email protected]>
>To: Pine Discussion Forum <
[email protected]>
>Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
>Subject: compression program
>
>Is there such a thing as a compression/decompression program that will
>work on BOTH a Unix platform AND and Windows (at the DOS prompt)?
>
>I've been using gzip / gunzip to compress / uncompress files on my Unix
>account, but obviously if I save the zipped files to the PC, I can't use
>gunzip there to unzip them. Of course it takes lots less time to download
>zipped files than unzipped ones. But it would be nice to be able to unzip
>them on the PC instead of uploading them back to the Unix platform.
>
>The question arises because I use PC-Pine to save old email on the PC (or
>ZIP disks). PC-Pine is just terrific for this!
Well, you could either use tar and gzip/gunzip in DOS - after
downloading them of course, or you could use zip/unzip in both
OS's.
--
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Mike A. Harris Shipping/mailing address:
OS Systems Engineer 190 Pittsburgh Ave., Sault Ste. Marie,
XFree86 maintainer Ontario, Canada, P6C 5B3
Red Hat Inc. Phone: (705)949-2136
http://www.redhat.com ftp://people.redhat.com/mharris
Red Hat XFree86 mailing list:
[email protected]
General open IRC discussion: #xfree86 on irc.openprojects.net
----------------------------------------------------------------------
From
[email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <
[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Wed, 23 Jan 2002 12:51:21 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <
[email protected]>
Received: from mailscan5.cac.washington.edu (mailscan5.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.14])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with SMTP id g0NKpK7i023560
for <
[email protected]>; Wed, 23 Jan 2002 12:51:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: FROM mx2.cac.washington.edu BY mailscan5.cac.washington.edu ; Wed Jan 23 12:51:18 2002 -0800
Received: from list2.u.washington.edu (list2.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.165])
by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with ESMTP id g0NKpImT025293;
Wed, 23 Jan 2002 12:51:18 -0800
Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13])
by list2.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with SMTP id g0NKoNKT016916;
Wed, 23 Jan 2002 12:50:23 -0800
Received: from mailscan6.cac.washington.edu (mailscan6.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.14])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with SMTP id g0NKlpw6156076
for <
[email protected]>; Wed, 23 Jan 2002 12:47:51 -0800
Received: FROM mxu1.u.washington.edu BY mailscan6.cac.washington.edu ; Wed Jan 23 12:47:51 2002 -0800
Received: from devserv.devel.redhat.com (nat-pool-meridian.redhat.com [12.107.208.200])
by mxu1.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with ESMTP id g0NKlopj004895
for <
[email protected]>; Wed, 23 Jan 2002 12:47:50 -0800
Received: from localhost (mharris@localhost)
by devserv.devel.redhat.com (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id g0NKlnV08273;
Wed, 23 Jan 2002 15:47:49 -0500
Message-Id: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0201231547230.10324-100000@devserv.devel.redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2002 15:47:49 -0500 (EST)
Sender:
[email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <
http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:
[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:
[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:
[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:
[email protected]>
From: "Mike A. Harris" <
[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <
[email protected]>
Subject: Re: compression program
In-Reply-To: <
[email protected]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-To: Kenneth Crudup <
[email protected]>
X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum <
[email protected]>
X-Authentication-Warning: devserv.devel.redhat.com: mharris owned process doing -bs
X-X-Sender: <
[email protected]>
X-Unexpected-Header: The Spanish Inquisition
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN
Status: O
X-Status:
X-Keywords:
X-UID: 102
On Sun, 20 Jan 2002, Kenneth Crudup wrote:
>Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2002 15:09:08 -0800 (PST)
>From: Kenneth Crudup <
[email protected]>
>To: Pine Discussion Forum <
[email protected]>
>Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
>Subject: Re: compression program
>
>On Sun, 20 Jan 2002, Freda B Birnbaum wrote:
>
>> Is there such a thing as a compression/decompression program that will
>> work on BOTH a Unix platform AND and Windows (at the DOS prompt)?
>
>Yeah, "pkzip"/"pkunzip". Get it from pkware.com for MS, "freshmeat" for *NIX.
Why not just use the open source zip/unzip programs instead?
--
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Mike A. Harris Shipping/mailing address:
OS Systems Engineer 190 Pittsburgh Ave., Sault Ste. Marie,
XFree86 maintainer Ontario, Canada, P6C 5B3
Red Hat Inc. Phone: (705)949-2136
http://www.redhat.com ftp://people.redhat.com/mharris
Red Hat XFree86 mailing list:
[email protected]
General open IRC discussion: #xfree86 on irc.openprojects.net
----------------------------------------------------------------------
From
[email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <
[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Wed, 23 Jan 2002 19:23:15 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <
[email protected]>
Received: from mailscan1.cac.washington.edu (mailscan1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.16])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with SMTP id g0O3ND7i020079
for <
[email protected]>; Wed, 23 Jan 2002 19:23:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: FROM mx2.cac.washington.edu BY mailscan1.cac.washington.edu ; Wed Jan 23 19:23:12 2002 -0800
Received: from list4.u.washington.edu (list4.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.167])
by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with ESMTP id g0O3NCmT003862;
Wed, 23 Jan 2002 19:23:12 -0800
Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13])
by list4.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with SMTP id g0O3MYkG016226;
Wed, 23 Jan 2002 19:22:35 -0800
Received: from mailscan5.cac.washington.edu (mailscan5.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.14])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with SMTP id g0O3IEw6163182
for <
[email protected]>; Wed, 23 Jan 2002 19:18:14 -0800
Received: FROM mxu4.u.washington.edu BY mailscan5.cac.washington.edu ; Wed Jan 23 19:18:13 2002 -0800
Received: from mail3.panix.com (mail3.panix.com [166.84.0.167])
by mxu4.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with ESMTP id g0O3ID37027587
for <
[email protected]>; Wed, 23 Jan 2002 19:18:13 -0800
Received: from cahome.localdomain (localhost.panix.com [127.0.0.1])
by mail3.panix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1894698242
for <
[email protected]>; Wed, 23 Jan 2002 22:18:09 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <
[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2002 19:18:06 -0800 (PST)
Sender:
[email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <
http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:
[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:
[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:
[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:
[email protected]>
From: Kenneth Crudup <
[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <
[email protected]>
Subject: Re: compression program
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0201231547230.10324-100000@devserv.devel.redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum <
[email protected]>
X-X-Sender:
[email protected]
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN
Status: O
X-Status:
X-Keywords:
X-UID: 103
> >Yeah, "pkzip"/"pkunzip". Get it from pkware.com for MS, "freshmeat" for *NIX.
On Wed, 23 Jan 2002, Mike A. Harris wrote:
> Why not just use the open source zip/unzip programs instead?
Those are the ones on freshmeat.
-Kenny
--
Kenneth R. Crudup Sr. SW Engineer, Scott County Consulting, Washington, D.C.
Home1: PO Box 914 Silver Spring, MD 20910-0914
[email protected]
Home2: 38010 Village Cmn. #217 Fremont, CA 94536-7525 (510) 745-0101
From
[email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <
[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 24 Jan 2002 01:00:46 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <
[email protected]>
Received: from mailscan4.cac.washington.edu (mailscan4.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.15])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with SMTP id g0O90g7i024756
for <
[email protected]>; Thu, 24 Jan 2002 01:00:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: FROM mx2.cac.washington.edu BY mailscan4.cac.washington.edu ; Thu Jan 24 01:00:31 2002 -0800
Received: from list2.u.washington.edu (list2.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.165])
by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with ESMTP id g0O90UmT009758;
Thu, 24 Jan 2002 01:00:30 -0800
Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13])
by list2.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with SMTP id g0O8xVKT015590;
Thu, 24 Jan 2002 00:59:32 -0800
Received: from mailscan2.cac.washington.edu (mailscan2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.16])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with SMTP id g0O8ubw6110688
for <
[email protected]>; Thu, 24 Jan 2002 00:56:37 -0800
Received: FROM mxu3.u.washington.edu BY mailscan2.cac.washington.edu ; Thu Jan 24 00:56:37 2002 -0800
Received: from megaloman.megaloman.sk ([62.168.101.252])
by mxu3.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with ESMTP id g0O8uTWn026595
for <
[email protected]>; Thu, 24 Jan 2002 00:56:35 -0800
Received: from localhost (hany@localhost)
by megaloman.megaloman.sk (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g0O8uPn22715
for <
[email protected]>; Thu, 24 Jan 2002 09:56:25 +0100
Message-Id: <
[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2002 09:56:25 +0100 (CET)
Sender:
[email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <
http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:
[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:
[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:
[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:
[email protected]>
From: Peter Hanecak <
[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <
[email protected]>
Subject: Pine 4.44: sending mail through local sendmail with enabled TLS
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-To: Pine Discussion Forum <
[email protected]>
X-X-Sender:
[email protected]
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN
Status: O
X-Status:
X-Keywords:
X-UID: 104
Hello,
yesterday I upgraded my Pine to version 4.44 and from that moment I've
been unable to send e-mails:
[Sending mail | |]
Problem detected: "Received abort signal".
Pine Exiting.
Enabling "enable-verbose-smtp-posting" (and using ^X^WY) does not reveal
any new messages.
This crash is for sure related to fact, that my sendmail has enabled TLS
(using openssl library and certificate signed by my own CA certificate).
First I suspected that certificate should be signed by some "root" CA so I
put my CA certificate info /usr/share/ssl/cert.pem but it does not help.
Only when I disabled TLS in sendmail the problem "disapeared" so now I'm
able to post messages using pine.
Do anyone have someinformation about how to use both sendmail with TLS and
new pine? Is this related to "* Crash when talking to SMTP server which
offers STARTTLS" mentioned in "Changes from Pine 4.40 to 4.41"?
BTW (maybe it is useless but maybe not), part of strace output:
..
open("/usr/share/ssl/cert.pem", O_RDONLY) = 7
fstat64(7, {st_mode=S_IFREG|0644, st_size=251330, ...}) = 0
old_mmap(NULL, 4096, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0) = 0x4001f000
read(7, "##\n## Extracted from the mod_ss"..., 4096) = 4096
..<reading /usr/share/ssl/cert.pem>...
read(7, "\neUBtZWdhbG9tYW4uY29tMB4XDTAxMDI"..., 4096) = 1474
brk(0x8375000) = 0x8375000
brk(0x8376000) = 0x8376000
read(7, "", 4096) = 0
getpid() = 22404
getpid() = 22404
getpid() = 22404
close(7) = 0
munmap(0x4001f000, 4096) = 0
open(umovestr: Input/output error
0, O_RDONLY) = -1 EFAULT (Bad address)
getpid() = 22404
getpid() = 22404
getpid() = 22404
getpid() = 22404
getpid() = 22404
getpid() = 22404
time(NULL) = 1011794019
getpid() = 22404
brk(0x837c000) = 0x837c000
brk(0x8381000) = 0x8381000
brk(0x8386000) = 0x8386000
time(NULL) = 1011794019
time(NULL) = 1011794019
getpid() = 22404
getpid() = 22404
getpid() = 22404
open("/dev/urandom", O_RDONLY) = 7
read(7, "R\354\260\310\r\303\224H>u\351Jx]\237\302\267\316\371\257"...,
20) = 20
close(7) = 0
getpid() = 22404
getpid() = 22404
getuid32() = 500
getpid() = 22404
time(NULL) = 1011794019
getpid() = 22404
.. now this repeats for about 30 times ...
getpid() = 22404
write(135419392, "\26\3\1\0S\1\0\0O\3\1<N\300c\243\311\366\243VHV\265J\5"..., 88) = -1 EBADF (Bad file descriptor)
rt_sigprocmask(SIG_SETMASK, [], [ALRM], 8) = 0
close(135419392) = -1 EBADF (Bad file descriptor)
close(1) = 0
rt_sigprocmask(SIG_BLOCK, [ALRM], [], 8) = 0
--- SIGSEGV (Segmentation fault) ---
..
Thanks in advance for any reply.
Sincerely
Peter Hanecak
--
===================================================================
Peter Hanecak <
[email protected]>
GPG pub.key:
http://www.megaloman.com/gpg/hanecak-megaloman.txt
===================================================================
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------
For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see:
http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/
-----------------------------------------------------------------
From
[email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <
[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 24 Jan 2002 16:33:02 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <
[email protected]>
Received: from mailscan6.cac.washington.edu (mailscan6.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.14])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with SMTP id g0P0X07i026054
for <
[email protected]>; Thu, 24 Jan 2002 16:33:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: FROM mx1.cac.washington.edu BY mailscan6.cac.washington.edu ; Thu Jan 24 16:32:58 2002 -0800
Received: from list1.u.washington.edu (list1.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.99])
by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with ESMTP id g0P0WwPs001882;
Thu, 24 Jan 2002 16:32:58 -0800
Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13])
by list1.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with SMTP id g0P0VDEr024092;
Thu, 24 Jan 2002 16:31:15 -0800
Received: from mailscan3.cac.washington.edu (mailscan3.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.15])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with SMTP id g0ON60w6016702
for <
[email protected]>; Thu, 24 Jan 2002 15:06:00 -0800
Received: FROM mxu3.u.washington.edu BY mailscan3.cac.washington.edu ; Thu Jan 24 15:05:59 2002 -0800
Received: from devserv.devel.redhat.com (nat-pool-meridian.redhat.com [12.107.208.200])
by mxu3.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with ESMTP id g0ON5xWn012957
for <
[email protected]>; Thu, 24 Jan 2002 15:05:59 -0800
Received: from localhost (mharris@localhost)
by devserv.devel.redhat.com (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id g0ON5s719945;
Thu, 24 Jan 2002 18:05:54 -0500
Message-Id: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0201241804270.22291-100000@devserv.devel.redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2002 18:05:54 -0500 (EST)
Sender:
[email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <
http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:
[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:
[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:
[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:
[email protected]>
From: "Mike A. Harris" <
[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <
[email protected]>
Subject: Re: compression program
In-Reply-To: <
[email protected]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-To: Kenneth Crudup <
[email protected]>
X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum <
[email protected]>
X-Authentication-Warning: devserv.devel.redhat.com: mharris owned process doing -bs
X-X-Sender: <
[email protected]>
X-Unexpected-Header: The Spanish Inquisition
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN
Status: O
X-Status:
X-Keywords:
X-UID: 105
On Wed, 23 Jan 2002, Kenneth Crudup wrote:
>Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2002 19:18:06 -0800 (PST)
>From: Kenneth Crudup <
[email protected]>
>To: Pine Discussion Forum <
[email protected]>
>Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
>Subject: Re: compression program
>
>
>> >Yeah, "pkzip"/"pkunzip". Get it from pkware.com for MS, "freshmeat" for *NIX.
>
>On Wed, 23 Jan 2002, Mike A. Harris wrote:
>
>> Why not just use the open source zip/unzip programs instead?
>
>Those are the ones on freshmeat.
Yes, but:
> >Yeah, "pkzip"/"pkunzip". Get it from pkware.com for MS, "freshmeat" for *NIX."
was what I was commenting on. pkzip/pkunzip is closed source.
zip/unzip are the open source alternatives. I was just curious
why one would want to use pkzip/pkunzip instead of zip/unzip.
--
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Mike A. Harris Shipping/mailing address:
OS Systems Engineer 190 Pittsburgh Ave., Sault Ste. Marie,
XFree86 maintainer Ontario, Canada, P6C 5B3
Red Hat Inc. Phone: (705)949-2136
http://www.redhat.com ftp://people.redhat.com/mharris
Red Hat XFree86 mailing list:
[email protected]
General open IRC discussion: #xfree86 on irc.openprojects.net
----------------------------------------------------------------------
From
[email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <
[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Fri, 25 Jan 2002 11:34:39 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <
[email protected]>
Received: from mailscan5.cac.washington.edu (mailscan5.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.14])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with SMTP id g0PJYb7i021237
for <
[email protected]>; Fri, 25 Jan 2002 11:34:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: FROM mx2.cac.washington.edu BY mailscan5.cac.washington.edu ; Fri Jan 25 11:34:35 2002 -0800
Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100])
by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with ESMTP id g0PJYZmT024849;
Fri, 25 Jan 2002 11:34:35 -0800
Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13])
by list3.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with SMTP id g0PJXVAf015098;
Fri, 25 Jan 2002 11:33:32 -0800
Received: from mailscan4.cac.washington.edu (mailscan4.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.15])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with SMTP id g0PJV5w6103778
for <
[email protected]>; Fri, 25 Jan 2002 11:31:05 -0800
Received: FROM mxu4.u.washington.edu BY mailscan4.cac.washington.edu ; Fri Jan 25 11:31:05 2002 -0800
Received: from blackhawk.dartas.com (blackhawk.dartas.com [64.40.200.98])
by mxu4.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with ESMTP id g0PJV337031877
for <
[email protected]>; Fri, 25 Jan 2002 11:31:03 -0800
Received: from appserv1 (tstroup.users.netset.com [64.40.199.161])
by blackhawk.dartas.com (8.12.2/8.12.2) with SMTP id g0PJV0IX013313
for <
[email protected]>; Fri, 25 Jan 2002 14:31:01 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <
[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2002 14:31:01 -0500
Sender:
[email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <
http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:
[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:
[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:
[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:
[email protected]>
From: "Todd R. Stroup" <
[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <
[email protected]>
Subject: Error message..
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-To: <
[email protected]>
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN
Status: O
X-Status:
X-Keywords:
X-UID: 106
When trying to send mail with pine 4.43 I get this error..
Mail not sent. Sending error: 421 4.3.0 collect: Cannot write ./dfg0PJ
Where does this come from and why do I get it? What can I do to fix this?
T..S
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------
For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see:
http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/
-----------------------------------------------------------------
From
[email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <
[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Fri, 25 Jan 2002 12:24:40 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <
[email protected]>
Received: from mailscan3.cac.washington.edu (mailscan3.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.15])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with SMTP id g0PKOb7i014662
for <
[email protected]>; Fri, 25 Jan 2002 12:24:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: FROM mx1.cac.washington.edu BY mailscan3.cac.washington.edu ; Fri Jan 25 12:24:31 2002 -0800
Received: from list1.u.washington.edu (list1.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.99])
by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with ESMTP id g0PKOVPs027190;
Fri, 25 Jan 2002 12:24:31 -0800
Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13])
by list1.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with SMTP id g0PKNYEr014676;
Fri, 25 Jan 2002 12:23:35 -0800
Received: from mailscan3.cac.washington.edu (mailscan3.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.15])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with SMTP id g0PKKdw6108862
for <
[email protected]>; Fri, 25 Jan 2002 12:20:40 -0800
Received: FROM mxu2.u.washington.edu BY mailscan3.cac.washington.edu ; Fri Jan 25 12:20:34 2002 -0800
Received: from aa.linuxbox.nu ([208.149.147.127])
by mxu2.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with ESMTP id g0PKKTAZ001418
for <
[email protected]>; Fri, 25 Jan 2002 12:20:34 -0800
Received: from apollo.linuxbox.private.nu (
[email protected] [10.1.1.42])
by aa.linuxbox.nu (8.11.2/8.11.2) with ESMTP id g0PKG6Z29524;
Fri, 25 Jan 2002 15:16:06 -0500
Message-Id: <Pine.LNX.4.43.0201251518000.5812-100000@apollo.linuxbox.private.nu>
Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2002 15:18:06 -0500 (EST)
Sender:
[email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <
http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:
[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:
[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:
[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:
[email protected]>
From: "Arthur H. Johnson II" <
[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <
[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Error message..
In-Reply-To: <
[email protected]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-To: "Todd R. Stroup" <
[email protected]>
X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum <
[email protected]>
X-X-Sender:
[email protected]
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN
Status: O
X-Status:
X-Keywords:
X-UID: 107
What platform are you on?
Arthur H. Johnson II
The Linux Box
http://www.linuxbox.nu
[email protected]
On Fri, 25 Jan 2002, Todd R. Stroup wrote:
>
> When trying to send mail with pine 4.43 I get this error..
>
> Mail not sent. Sending error: 421 4.3.0 collect: Cannot write ./dfg0PJ
>
> Where does this come from and why do I get it? What can I do to fix this?
>
> T..S
> --
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see:
>
http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
>
From
[email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <
[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Fri, 25 Jan 2002 12:50:20 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <
[email protected]>
Received: from mailscan5.cac.washington.edu (mailscan5.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.14])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with SMTP id g0PKoI7i021494
for <
[email protected]>; Fri, 25 Jan 2002 12:50:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: FROM mx2.cac.washington.edu BY mailscan5.cac.washington.edu ; Fri Jan 25 12:50:16 2002 -0800
Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100])
by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with ESMTP id g0PKoGmT027068;
Fri, 25 Jan 2002 12:50:16 -0800
Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13])
by list3.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with SMTP id g0PKnVAf021756;
Fri, 25 Jan 2002 12:49:32 -0800
Received: from mailscan4.cac.washington.edu (mailscan4.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.15])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with SMTP id g0PKkXw6093962
for <
[email protected]>; Fri, 25 Jan 2002 12:46:34 -0800
Received: FROM mxu2.u.washington.edu BY mailscan4.cac.washington.edu ; Fri Jan 25 12:46:33 2002 -0800
Received: from blackhawk.dartas.com (blackhawk.dartas.com [64.40.200.98])
by mxu2.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with ESMTP id g0PKkWAZ008062
for <
[email protected]>; Fri, 25 Jan 2002 12:46:32 -0800
Received: from appserv1 (tstroup.users.netset.com [64.40.199.161])
by blackhawk.dartas.com (8.12.2/8.12.2) with SMTP id g0PKkNIX013687;
Fri, 25 Jan 2002 15:46:24 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <
[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2002 15:46:24 -0500
Sender:
[email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <
http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:
[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:
[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:
[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:
[email protected]>
From: "Todd R. Stroup" <
[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <
[email protected]>
Subject: RE: Error message..
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.43.0201251518000.5812-100000@apollo.linuxbox.private.nu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-To: "Arthur H. Johnson II" <
[email protected]>
X-Cc: "Pine Discussion Forum" <
[email protected]>
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN
Status: O
X-Status:
X-Keywords:
X-UID: 108
Solaris 8 w/ sendmail 8.12..
>From the debug it looks like it calls sendmail just fine but after that not
sure where it's trying to write this file at.. I'm able to get pop mail just
fine.
15:10:19.747983
Opened SMTP server "blackhawk"
15:10:19.748554
IMAP DEBUG 15:10:19.748936 1/25: RSET
15:10:19.750196
IMAP DEBUG 15:10:19.750636 1/25: 250 2.0.0 Reset state
15:10:19.751390
IMAP DEBUG 15:10:19.751781 1/25: MAIL FROM:<
[email protected]>
15:10:19.766065
IMAP DEBUG 15:10:19.766538 1/25: 250 2.1.0 <
[email protected]>... Sender ok
15:10:19.767417
IMAP DEBUG 15:10:19.767811 1/25: RCPT TO:<
[email protected]>
15:10:19.776130
IMAP DEBUG 15:10:19.776576 1/25: 250 2.1.5 <
[email protected]>... Recipient
ok
15:10:19.777327
IMAP DEBUG 15:10:19.777730 1/25: DATA
15:10:19.779164
IMAP DEBUG 15:10:19.779620 1/25: 354 Enter mail, end with "." on a line by
itself
15:10:19.780346
-- pine_rfc822_output
15:10:19.780811
busy_alarm(1, Busy, 0, 0)
15:10:19.781451
-- pine_encode_body: 0
15:10:19.783229
-- pine_rfc822_output_body: 0
15:10:19.783816
-- pine_rfc822_output_body: segment 0 bytes
15:10:19.784377
-- gf_reset local_nvtnl
15:10:19.784957
-- gf_pipe:
15:10:19.785538
done.
15:10:19.786070
IMAP DEBUG 15:10:19.786455 1/25: .
15:10:19.792838
IMAP DEBUG 15:10:19.793295 1/25: 421 4.3.0 collect: Cannot write
/dfg0PKAJTa013525 (bfcommit, uid
=25, gid=25): Permission denied
15:10:19.794033
Mail not sent. Sending error: 421 4.3.0 collect: Cannot write ./dfg0PK
15:10:19.802701
SIGCHLD raised
T..S
-----Original Message-----
From: Arthur H. Johnson II [mailto:
[email protected]]
Sent: Friday, January 25, 2002 3:18 PM
To: Todd R. Stroup
Cc: Pine Discussion Forum
Subject: Re: Error message..
What platform are you on?
Arthur H. Johnson II
The Linux Box
http://www.linuxbox.nu
[email protected]
On Fri, 25 Jan 2002, Todd R. Stroup wrote:
>
> When trying to send mail with pine 4.43 I get this error..
>
> Mail not sent. Sending error: 421 4.3.0 collect: Cannot write ./dfg0PJ
>
> Where does this come from and why do I get it? What can I do to fix this?
>
> T..S
> --
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see:
>
http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
>
From
[email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <
[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Fri, 25 Jan 2002 13:24:41 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <
[email protected]>
Received: from mailscan1.cac.washington.edu (mailscan1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.16])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with SMTP id g0PLOc7i029307
for <
[email protected]>; Fri, 25 Jan 2002 13:24:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: FROM mx1.cac.washington.edu BY mailscan1.cac.washington.edu ; Fri Jan 25 13:24:35 2002 -0800
Received: from list2.u.washington.edu (list2.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.165])
by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with ESMTP id g0PLOZPs028817;
Fri, 25 Jan 2002 13:24:35 -0800
Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13])
by list2.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with SMTP id g0PLNgKT016412;
Fri, 25 Jan 2002 13:23:42 -0800
Received: from mailscan6.cac.washington.edu (mailscan6.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.14])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with SMTP id g0PLLIw6046486
for <
[email protected]>; Fri, 25 Jan 2002 13:21:18 -0800
Received: FROM mxu2.u.washington.edu BY mailscan6.cac.washington.edu ; Fri Jan 25 13:21:14 2002 -0800
Received: from moultrie.cse.sc.edu ([129.252.138.7])
by mxu2.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with ESMTP id g0PLLDAZ018073
for <
[email protected]>; Fri, 25 Jan 2002 13:21:14 -0800
Received: from mum.cse.sc.edu (mum.cse.sc.edu [129.252.138.21])
by moultrie.cse.sc.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D8321FA2D
for <
[email protected]>; Fri, 25 Jan 2002 16:21:13 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <
[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2002 16:21:13 -0500 (EST)
Sender:
[email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <
http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:
[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:
[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:
[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:
[email protected]>
From: Gopi Sundaram <
[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <
[email protected]>
Subject: RE: Error message..
In-Reply-To: <
[email protected]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-To: Pine Discussion Forum <
[email protected]>
X-X-Sender:
[email protected]
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN
Status: O
X-Status:
X-Keywords:
X-UID: 109
On Fri, 25 Jan 2002, Todd R. Stroup wrote:
<snip>
It looks like the message is coming from your MTA, not Pine.
Investigate it on that end.
--
Gopi Sundaram
[email protected]
http://www.cse.sc.edu/~gopalan/Pine/
From
[email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <
[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Fri, 25 Jan 2002 13:28:01 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <
[email protected]>
Received: from mailscan1.cac.washington.edu (mailscan1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.16])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with SMTP id g0PLRw7i027155
for <
[email protected]>; Fri, 25 Jan 2002 13:27:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: FROM mx1.cac.washington.edu BY mailscan1.cac.washington.edu ; Fri Jan 25 13:27:51 2002 -0800
Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100])
by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with ESMTP id g0PLRpPs028912;
Fri, 25 Jan 2002 13:27:51 -0800
Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13])
by list3.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with SMTP id g0PLQHAf020780;
Fri, 25 Jan 2002 13:26:18 -0800
Received: from mailscan1.cac.washington.edu (mailscan1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.16])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with SMTP id g0PLO7w6070846
for <
[email protected]>; Fri, 25 Jan 2002 13:24:07 -0800
Received: FROM mxu2.u.washington.edu BY mailscan1.cac.washington.edu ; Fri Jan 25 13:24:07 2002 -0800
Received: from erebus.rutgers.edu (erebus.Rutgers.EDU [165.230.116.132])
by mxu2.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with SMTP id g0PLO6AZ018924
for <
[email protected]>; Fri, 25 Jan 2002 13:24:07 -0800
Received: (qmail 17205 invoked by alias); 25 Jan 2002 21:24:04 -0000
Received: (qmail 17198 invoked from network); 25 Jan 2002 21:24:04 -0000
Received: from jahannan.rutgers.edu (165.230.116.163)
by erebus.rutgers.edu with SMTP; 25 Jan 2002 21:24:04 -0000
Received: (qmail 7184 invoked by uid 27864); 25 Jan 2002 21:24:05 -0000
Message-Id: <
[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2002 16:24:05 -0500 (EST)
Sender:
[email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <
http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:
[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:
[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:
[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:
[email protected]>
From: Help for RCI Users <
[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <
[email protected]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-X-Sender:
[email protected]
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN
Status: O
X-Status:
X-Keywords:
X-UID: 110
In hopes of using pine for mass mailing in as automated a way as
possible, is there a way to supply subject on the command line? Here is a
sample command:
pine -attach xxx.html -signature-file=xxx/file1 harry@imcs,john@aesop
We're looking for some way to imitate the
mailx -s"this goes on subject line" harry@imcs <xxx/file1
ability.
---
Chris Jarocha-Ernst
[email protected]
New Brunswick Computing Services Research Computing Initiative Help
Busch Campus, Rutgers University Piscataway, NJ 08855
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------
For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see:
http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/
-----------------------------------------------------------------
From
[email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <
[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Fri, 25 Jan 2002 13:34:42 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <
[email protected]>
Received: from mailscan4.cac.washington.edu (mailscan4.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.15])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with SMTP id g0PLYc7i001592
for <
[email protected]>; Fri, 25 Jan 2002 13:34:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: FROM mx1.cac.washington.edu BY mailscan4.cac.washington.edu ; Fri Jan 25 13:34:37 2002 -0800
Received: from list4.u.washington.edu (list4.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.167])
by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with ESMTP id g0PLYaPs029098;
Fri, 25 Jan 2002 13:34:36 -0800
Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13])
by list4.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with SMTP id g0PLXXkG017854;
Fri, 25 Jan 2002 13:33:33 -0800
Received: from mailscan3.cac.washington.edu (mailscan3.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.15])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with SMTP id g0PLVMw6159600
for <
[email protected]>; Fri, 25 Jan 2002 13:31:22 -0800
Received: FROM mxu4.u.washington.edu BY mailscan3.cac.washington.edu ; Fri Jan 25 13:31:22 2002 -0800
Received: from blackhawk.dartas.com (blackhawk.dartas.com [64.40.200.98])
by mxu4.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with ESMTP id g0PLVL37001428
for <
[email protected]>; Fri, 25 Jan 2002 13:31:22 -0800
Received: from appserv1 (tstroup.users.netset.com [64.40.199.161])
by blackhawk.dartas.com (8.12.2/8.12.2) with SMTP id g0PLVIIX013912;
Fri, 25 Jan 2002 16:31:19 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <
[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2002 16:31:18 -0500
Sender:
[email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <
http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:
[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:
[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:
[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:
[email protected]>
From: "Todd R. Stroup" <
[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <
[email protected]>
Subject: RE: Error message..
In-Reply-To: <
[email protected]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-To: "Gopi Sundaram" <
[email protected]>,
"Pine Discussion Forum" <
[email protected]>
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN
Status: O
X-Status:
X-Keywords:
X-UID: 111
Like I said - I'm getting pop mail just fine.... it appears, from the debug
that I sent earlier, to be some type of temp file or something that pine is
creating somewhere that is doesn't have permission to write to.
bash-2.05# telnet localhost 25
Trying 127.0.0.1...
Connected to localhost.
Escape character is '^]'.
220 blackhawk.dartas.com ESMTP Sendmail 8.12.2/8.12.2; Fri, 25 Jan 2002
16:27:59 -0500 (EST)
helo dartas.com
250 blackhawk.dartas.com Hello localhost [127.0.0.1], pleased to meet you
mail from:
[email protected]
250 2.1.0
[email protected]... Sender ok
rcpt to:
[email protected]
250 2.1.5
[email protected]... Recipient ok
data
354 Enter mail, end with "." on a line by itself
This is a test of the MTA -even though I'm getting mail fine with pop.