From pinedev@shiva0.cac.washington.edu Sun Oct 1 01:41:14 2000 -0700

From [email protected] Sun Oct 1 01:41:14 2000 -0700
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Sun, 1 Oct 2000 01:41:13 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.1])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW99.08) with ESMTP id BAA18297;
Sun, 1 Oct 2000 01:41:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists4.u.washington.edu ([email protected] [140.142.56.2])
by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id BAA21249;
Sun, 1 Oct 2000 01:41:11 -0700
Received: from host ([email protected] [140.142.56.13])
by lists4.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id BAA19405;
Sun, 1 Oct 2000 01:40:49 -0700
Received: from mxu3.u.washington.edu (mxu3.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.7])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id BAA172656
for <[email protected]>; Sun, 1 Oct 2000 01:39:01 -0700
Received: from jim.southcom.com.au (IDENT:[email protected] [203.31.83.230])
by mxu3.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id BAA13542
for <[email protected]>; Sun, 1 Oct 2000 01:38:58 -0700
Received: from localhost (jim@localhost)
by jim.southcom.com.au (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id e919d0625932;
Sun, 1 Oct 2000 20:39:01 +1100
Message-Id: <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 1 Oct 2000 20:39:00 +1100 (EST)
Sender: [email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
From: Jim Woodward <[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Multiline header bug
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.21.0009281246280.9778-100000@mail>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-To: Francisco Arias <[email protected]>
X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN

On Thu, 28 Sep 2000, Francisco Arias wrote:

>
> I'm refering to the "UW c-client library vulnerability" that
> appears on september 1st on this list and bugtraq. I have not heard about
> a patch for this.

I have been looking for a patch also, I heard that its fixed in pine 4.30
which is still in beta test, I wonder when either a patch or pine 4.30
(said to be in beta since July?) will be available.

Regards, Jim.

-
name : Jim Woodward
www : http://www.jim.southcom.com.au
email : [email protected]

From [email protected] Tue Oct 3 15:15:07 2000 -0700
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 15:15:06 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.1])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW99.08) with ESMTP id PAA31951;
Tue, 3 Oct 2000 15:15:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists3.u.washington.edu ([email protected] [140.142.56.3])
by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id PAA08592;
Tue, 3 Oct 2000 15:15:03 -0700
Received: from host ([email protected] [140.142.56.13])
by lists3.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id PAA08778;
Tue, 3 Oct 2000 15:14:13 -0700
Received: from mxu4.u.washington.edu (mxu4.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.8])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id OAA166826
for <[email protected]>; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 14:55:58 -0700
Received: from kilo.clearoption.com (kilo.clearoption.com [205.200.121.30])
by mxu4.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id OAA18677
for <[email protected]>; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 14:55:56 -0700
Received: from ctech404 (link.clearoption.com [205.200.121.51])
by kilo.clearoption.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 44FC710681
for <[email protected]>; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 16:55:54 -0500 (CDT)
Message-Id: <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2000 16:55:07 -0500
Reply-To: <[email protected]>
Sender: [email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
From: "John Lange" <[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
Subject: Remote explote for Pine.
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-To: "pine-info" <[email protected]>
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN

So what is being done about this?

I have shut down Pine until I can get more info or a patch but my users are
screaming.

John Lange
Darkcore Network

--
-----------------------------------------------------------------
For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see:
http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/
-----------------------------------------------------------------

From [email protected] Tue Oct 3 16:54:11 2000 -0700
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 16:54:10 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.1])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW99.08) with ESMTP id QAA29036;
Tue, 3 Oct 2000 16:54:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists3.u.washington.edu ([email protected] [140.142.56.3])
by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id QAA12178;
Tue, 3 Oct 2000 16:54:09 -0700
Received: from host ([email protected] [140.142.56.13])
by lists3.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id QAA14627;
Tue, 3 Oct 2000 16:53:40 -0700
Received: from mxu1.u.washington.edu (mxu1.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.8])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id QAA159440
for <[email protected]>; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 16:52:47 -0700
Received: from aurora.uaf.edu ([email protected] [137.229.18.100])
by mxu1.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id QAA26588
for <[email protected]>; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 16:52:47 -0700
Received: from localhost (fxjwk@localhost)
by aurora.uaf.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA13721;
Tue, 3 Oct 2000 15:52:44 -0800 (AKDT)
Message-Id: <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2000 15:52:44 -0800 (AKDT)
Sender: [email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
From: Jo Knox <[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Remote explote for Pine.
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-To: [email protected]
X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN

On Tue, 3 Oct 2000, John Lange wrote:

> So what is being done about this?
>
> I have shut down Pine until I can get more info or a patch but my users are
> screaming.

If you are referring to OpenBSD Security group putting Pine on their
"forbidden" list, their methodology (as described) is flawed... If I read
it right, the claim is that since pine uses c functions which can be
exploited by buffer overflows, then a hacker could construct and mail a
message which would have a super long record with executable
payload---that's a huge leap of logic there; one does not necessarily
imply the other! That not withstanding, it could be possible. Were that
to be exploited, the message's executed payload could end up with the
privs of the user who invoked Pine. Seems like the safest course of
action is to forward root's mail somewhere else (doesn't everybody?) and
treat it like other layered software.

Or did I miss something else?

Let's all use Outlook Express! (And how many days has DOD been shut down
with mail worms?)

jo

From [email protected] Tue Oct 3 17:45:42 2000 -0700
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 17:45:42 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW99.08) with ESMTP id RAA06886;
Tue, 3 Oct 2000 17:45:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists3.u.washington.edu ([email protected] [140.142.56.3])
by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id RAA28817;
Tue, 3 Oct 2000 17:45:40 -0700
Received: from host ([email protected] [140.142.56.13])
by lists3.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id RAA17011;
Tue, 3 Oct 2000 17:44:59 -0700
Received: from mxu4.u.washington.edu (mxu4.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.8])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id RAA94104
for <[email protected]>; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 17:44:17 -0700
Received: from isr5981.urh.uiuc.edu ([email protected] [130.126.211.213])
by mxu4.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id RAA20309
for <[email protected]>; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 17:44:16 -0700
Received: (qmail 62312 invoked by uid 1000); 4 Oct 2000 00:44:16 -0000
Received: from localhost ([email protected])
by localhost with SMTP; 4 Oct 2000 00:44:16 -0000
Message-Id: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0010031939500.21038-100000@palanthas.neverending.org>
Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2000 19:44:13 -0500 (CDT)
Sender: [email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
From: Frank Tobin <[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Remote explote for Pine.
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-To: Jo Knox <[email protected]>
X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
X-Sender: [email protected]
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Jo Knox, at 15:52 -0800 on Tue, 3 Oct 2000, wrote:

> If you are referring to OpenBSD Security group putting Pine on their
> "forbidden" list, their methodology (as described) is flawed...

FreeBSD, not OpenBSD (although maybe them too).

> If I read it right, the claim is that since pine uses c functions
> which can be exploited by buffer overflows, then a hacker could
> construct and mail a message which would have a super long record with
> executable payload---that's a huge leap of logic there; one does not
> necessarily imply the other!

They do not imply each other, but it is cause for very high suspiscion.
Either way, it has more to do with the numerous use of these functions,
and the history of UofW systems.

> That not withstanding, it could be possible. Were that to be
> exploited, the message's executed payload could end up with the privs
> of the user who invoked Pine. Seems like the safest course of action
> is to forward root's mail somewhere else (doesn't everybody?) and
> treat it like other layered software.

There are two effects that this can bring about. First, a DOS against the
Pine user. Second, more serious, a remote attacker could send mail which
could get the user to execute an arbitrary command.

- --
Frank Tobin http://www.uiuc.edu/~ftobin/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.3 (FreeBSD)
Comment: pgpenvelope 2.9.0 - http://pgpenvelope.sourceforge.net/

iEYEARECAAYFAjnafWAACgkQVv/RCiYMT6M/KwCgn8RVFd3eZNnRfG8tImRUpq+/
ATgAoJmGhBtsSHDb/XagckTzuHqVHrH3
=TCsb
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

From [email protected] Tue Oct 3 18:59:03 2000 -0700
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 18:59:02 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.1])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW99.08) with ESMTP id SAA00929;
Tue, 3 Oct 2000 18:59:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists5.u.washington.edu ([email protected] [140.142.56.6])
by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id SAA14957;
Tue, 3 Oct 2000 18:59:00 -0700
Received: from host ([email protected] [140.142.56.13])
by lists5.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id SAA18624;
Tue, 3 Oct 2000 18:58:12 -0700
Received: from mxu2.u.washington.edu (mxu2.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.9])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id SAA172552
for <[email protected]>; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 18:57:15 -0700
Received: from kilo.clearoption.com (kilo.clearoption.com [205.200.121.30])
by mxu2.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id SAA28695
for <[email protected]>; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 18:57:14 -0700
Received: from ctech404 (link.clearoption.com [205.200.121.51])
by kilo.clearoption.com (Postfix) with SMTP
id BD20910681; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 20:57:13 -0500 (CDT)
Message-Id: <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2000 20:56:26 -0500
Reply-To: <[email protected]>
Sender: [email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
From: "John Lange" <[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
Subject: RE: Remote explote for Pine.
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-To: "Jo Knox" <[email protected]>,
"Pine Discussion Forum" <[email protected]>
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN

No, I'm referring to the remote exploit of Pine's mail checking routine that
allows a remote user to send mail to a client with a long "FROM" field,
crashing Pine and gaining access to the users account:

http://www.securityfocus.com/frames/?content=/vdb/bottom.html%3Fvid%3D1709

The scary part is "this can be used for a remote, anonymous attacker to gain
local access to the target host."

Obviously a huge concern. While no exploit has been found in the wild, I
don't want myself or my users to be the first ones to discover one.

I'm wondering if a patch is in the works and how long its expected to take
or do I have to go to the trouble to install a new local mail client
instead? My users obviously can't live without their mail for very long.

The bugtraq advisory was already posted to this list (I read it in the
archives) but here is the jist of it:

--- snip ---
A buffer overflow vulnerability exists in the popular mail client Pine 4.21
(and possibly earlier versions), relating to the function which regularly
checks for incoming email. In standard e-mail message headers is a field
that holds the name and address of the sender. It typically looks like and
is presented in pine like this:

From: username <user@host>

Pine does not check the length of the username value when copying it into a
memory buffer of predefined length. As a result, if a large "from" value is
sent in the email header, it can corrupt "internal" memory when the
offending function is called and the oversized buffer is copied onto the
stack. An attacker can overwrite the return address of the function on the
stack with a value that points back into the buffer, to which the function
would return. Arbitrary machine instructions placed on the stack would then
be executed.

The real concern here is that this requires no user interaction to exploit..
a target need only be using a vulnerable version of pine. The overflow
occurs when the user recieves new email. While typically not yielding root
priviliges (unless root reads email with pine AS root) this can be used for
a remote, anonymous attacker to gain local access to the target host.
--- snip ---

John Lange

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]]On Behalf Of Jo Knox
Sent: Tuesday, October 03, 2000 6:53 PM
To: Pine Discussion Forum
Subject: Re: Remote explote for Pine.

On Tue, 3 Oct 2000, John Lange wrote:

> So what is being done about this?
>
> I have shut down Pine until I can get more info or a patch but my users
are
> screaming.

If you are referring to OpenBSD Security group putting Pine on their
"forbidden" list, their methodology (as described) is flawed... If I read
it right, the claim is that since pine uses c functions which can be
exploited by buffer overflows, then a hacker could construct and mail a
message which would have a super long record with executable
payload---that's a huge leap of logic there; one does not necessarily
imply the other! That not withstanding, it could be possible. Were that
to be exploited, the message's executed payload could end up with the
privs of the user who invoked Pine. Seems like the safest course of
action is to forward root's mail somewhere else (doesn't everybody?) and
treat it like other layered software.

Or did I miss something else?

Let's all use Outlook Express! (And how many days has DOD been shut down
with mail worms?)

jo

From [email protected] Tue Oct 3 23:46:05 2000 -0700
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 23:46:04 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW99.08) with ESMTP id XAA28912;
Tue, 3 Oct 2000 23:46:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists5.u.washington.edu ([email protected] [140.142.56.6])
by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id XAA05234;
Tue, 3 Oct 2000 23:45:58 -0700
Received: from host ([email protected] [140.142.56.13])
by lists5.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id XAA26945;
Tue, 3 Oct 2000 23:45:33 -0700
Received: from mxu2.u.washington.edu (mxu2.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.9])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id XAA216668
for <[email protected]>; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 23:44:37 -0700
Received: from fester.comp-u-port.net (IDENT:[email protected] [207.89.149.61])
by mxu2.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id XAA26999
for <[email protected]>; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 23:44:35 -0700
Received: from pugsley.comp-u-port.net (pugsley.comp-u-port.net [207.89.149.34])
by fester.comp-u-port.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id CAA14411
for <[email protected]>; Wed, 4 Oct 2000 02:44:29 -0400
Message-Id: <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2000 02:44:28 -0400 (Eastern Daylight Time)
Sender: [email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
From: pine-info <[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
Subject: PC-Pine 4.21 attachment path size limit?
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-Sender: [email protected]
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN

DISCLAIMER:
Just joined, but searched the archives and did not find this
mentioned. If it has been discussed, please point me to the
thread. Thanx.

Can anyone confirm that in PC-Pine v4.21 (on WinNT) the fully
qualified path for attachments must be less than or equal to 79
characters?

I am not able to attach a file if the fully qualified path is 80 or
more characters. i.e.

x:\123456789012345678901234567890123456789012345678901234567890123456789012.ext
x:\directory1\directory2\directory3\directory4\directory5\directory6\file12.ext

both attach fine, but

x:\1234567890123456789012345678901234567890123456789012345678901234567890123.ext
x:\directory1\directory2\directory3\directory4\directory5\directory6\file123.ext

Don't.

If others can confirm this, would the developers please extend this to
at least 255 is not longer.

Thanks.

--
Derek Diget

--
-----------------------------------------------------------------
For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see:
http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/
-----------------------------------------------------------------

From [email protected] Mon Oct 9 07:24:33 2000 -0700
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Mon, 9 Oct 2000 07:24:32 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.1])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id HAA25585;
Mon, 9 Oct 2000 07:24:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists5.u.washington.edu ([email protected] [140.142.56.6])
by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id HAA22888;
Mon, 9 Oct 2000 07:24:31 -0700
Received: from host ([email protected] [140.142.56.13])
by lists5.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id HAA12299;
Mon, 9 Oct 2000 07:23:48 -0700
Received: from mxu2.u.washington.edu (mxu2.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.9])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id HAA22724
for <[email protected]>; Mon, 9 Oct 2000 07:22:03 -0700
Received: from skippy.hhnt.org.uk (skippy.hhnt.org.uk [193.32.22.91])
by mxu2.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id HAA12674
for <[email protected]>; Mon, 9 Oct 2000 07:22:02 -0700
Received: from agent-cxh (unverified) by skippy.hhnt.org.uk
(Content Technologies SMTPRS 4.1.5) with SMTP id <[email protected]> for <[email protected]>;
Mon, 9 Oct 2000 15:37:46 +0100
Received: from HHT-Message_Server by agent-cxh
with Novell_GroupWise; Mon, 09 Oct 2000 15:22:19 +0100
Message-Id: <s9e1e2ab.001@agent-cxh>
Date: Mon, 09 Oct 2000 15:21:54 +0100
Sender: [email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
From: "Bridget Nichols" <[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
Subject: date/time stamping in debug files
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
X-To: <[email protected]>
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN

Is there any way of having more date/time stamps in the debug files?

**********************************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and=20
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they =20
are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify=20
your email system administrator.

This footnote also confirms that this email message has been checked
for the presence of computer viruses.
**********************************************************************
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------
For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see:
http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/
-----------------------------------------------------------------

From [email protected] Mon Oct 9 08:43:56 2000 -0700
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Mon, 9 Oct 2000 08:43:56 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.1])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id IAA29491;
Mon, 9 Oct 2000 08:43:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists3.u.washington.edu ([email protected] [140.142.56.3])
by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id IAA25134;
Mon, 9 Oct 2000 08:43:54 -0700
Received: from host ([email protected] [140.142.56.13])
by lists3.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id IAA12802;
Mon, 9 Oct 2000 08:43:02 -0700
Received: from mxu3.u.washington.edu (mxu3.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.7])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id IAA124280
for <[email protected]>; Mon, 9 Oct 2000 08:42:12 -0700
Received: from euler.math.washington.edu (euler.math.washington.edu [128.95.224.1])
by mxu3.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id IAA10753
for <[email protected]>; Mon, 9 Oct 2000 08:42:12 -0700
Received: from goedel3.math.washington.edu (goedel3.math.washington.edu [128.95.224.12])
by euler.math.washington.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id IAA346986;
Mon, 9 Oct 2000 08:42:06 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <Pine.OSF.4.21.0010090841090.347148-100000@goedel3.math.washington.edu>
Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2000 08:42:06 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: [email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
From: Eduardo Chappa <[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: date/time stamping in debug files
In-Reply-To: <s9e1e2ab.001@agent-cxh>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-To: Bridget Nichols <[email protected]>
X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN

*** Bridget Nichols ([email protected]) wrote in the pine-info list about
"date/time stamping in debug files" today:

:) Is there any way of having more date/time stamps in the debug files?

Start Pine with like "pine -d datestamp". See "pine -h" for more options.

--
Eduardo
http://www.math.washington.edu/~chappa/pine/

From [email protected] Tue Oct 10 02:15:50 2000 -0700
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Tue, 10 Oct 2000 02:15:50 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id CAA04366;
Tue, 10 Oct 2000 02:15:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists5.u.washington.edu ([email protected] [140.142.56.6])
by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id CAA04452;
Tue, 10 Oct 2000 02:15:48 -0700
Received: from host ([email protected] [140.142.56.13])
by lists5.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id CAA05681;
Tue, 10 Oct 2000 02:10:12 -0700
Received: from mxu2.u.washington.edu (mxu2.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.9])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id CAA173032
for <[email protected]>; Tue, 10 Oct 2000 02:09:18 -0700
Received: from skippy.hhnt.org.uk (skippy.hhnt.org.uk [193.32.22.91])
by mxu2.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id CAA00451
for <[email protected]>; Tue, 10 Oct 2000 02:09:17 -0700
Received: from agent-cxh (unverified) by skippy.hhnt.org.uk
(Content Technologies SMTPRS 4.1.5) with SMTP id <[email protected]> for <[email protected]>;
Tue, 10 Oct 2000 10:25:06 +0100
Received: from HHT-Message_Server by agent-cxh
with Novell_GroupWise; Tue, 10 Oct 2000 10:10:08 +0100
Message-Id: <s9e2eb00.038@agent-cxh>
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2000 10:09:54 +0100
Sender: [email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
From: "Bridget Nichols" <[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
Subject: command line use of pine
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
X-To: <[email protected]>
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN

Is is possible to run pine as a single command line execution as follows:

pine [email protected] -attach filename ....

without going into Compose and selecting ^XY

**********************************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and=20
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they =20
are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify=20
your email system administrator.

This footnote also confirms that this email message has been checked
for the presence of computer viruses.
**********************************************************************
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------
For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see:
http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/
-----------------------------------------------------------------

From [email protected] Tue Oct 10 02:25:22 2000 -0700
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Tue, 10 Oct 2000 02:25:20 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id CAA24014;
Tue, 10 Oct 2000 02:25:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists5.u.washington.edu ([email protected] [140.142.56.6])
by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id CAA04627;
Tue, 10 Oct 2000 02:25:18 -0700
Received: from host ([email protected] [140.142.56.13])
by lists5.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id CAA05955;
Tue, 10 Oct 2000 02:24:48 -0700
Received: from mxu1.u.washington.edu (mxu1.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.8])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id CAA141446
for <[email protected]>; Tue, 10 Oct 2000 02:24:07 -0700
Received: from isr5981.urh.uiuc.edu ([email protected] [130.126.211.213])
by mxu1.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id CAA30768
for <[email protected]>; Tue, 10 Oct 2000 02:24:06 -0700
Received: (qmail 41158 invoked by uid 1000); 10 Oct 2000 09:24:06 -0000
Received: from localhost ([email protected])
by localhost with SMTP; 10 Oct 2000 09:24:06 -0000
Message-Id: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0010100423150.41138-100000@localhost>
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2000 04:24:06 -0500 (CDT)
Sender: [email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
From: Frank Tobin <[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: command line use of pine
In-Reply-To: <s9e2eb00.038@agent-cxh>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-To: Bridget Nichols <[email protected]>
X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
X-Sender: ftobin@localhost
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN

Bridget Nichols, at 10:09 +0100 on Tue, 10 Oct 2000, wrote:

> Is is possible to run pine as a single command line execution as follows:
>
> pine [email protected] -attach filename ....
>
> without going into Compose and selecting ^XY

You might just want to bypass Pine altogether and do:

mail [email protected] < filename

..assuming, of course, you don't mind "filename" being in-body.

--
Frank Tobin http://www.uiuc.edu/~ftobin/

From [email protected] Tue Oct 10 02:28:22 2000 -0700
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Tue, 10 Oct 2000 02:28:22 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id CAA09267;
Tue, 10 Oct 2000 02:28:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists4.u.washington.edu ([email protected] [140.142.56.2])
by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id CAA04682;
Tue, 10 Oct 2000 02:28:19 -0700
Received: from host ([email protected] [140.142.56.13])
by lists4.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id CAA16870;
Tue, 10 Oct 2000 02:22:52 -0700
Received: from mxu1.u.washington.edu (mxu1.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.8])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id CAA119092
for <[email protected]>; Tue, 10 Oct 2000 02:22:18 -0700
Received: from skippy.hhnt.org.uk (skippy.hhnt.org.uk [193.32.22.91])
by mxu1.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id CAA30669
for <[email protected]>; Tue, 10 Oct 2000 02:22:17 -0700
Received: from agent-cxh (unverified) by skippy.hhnt.org.uk
(Content Technologies SMTPRS 4.1.5) with SMTP id <[email protected]> for <[email protected]>;
Tue, 10 Oct 2000 10:38:19 +0100
Received: from HHT-Message_Server by agent-cxh
with Novell_GroupWise; Tue, 10 Oct 2000 10:23:26 +0100
Message-Id: <s9e2ee1e.068@agent-cxh>
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2000 10:23:01 +0100
Sender: [email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
From: "Bridget Nichols" <[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
Subject: time delay
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
X-To: <[email protected]>
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN

I have a 1minute time delay be

**********************************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and=20
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they =20
are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify=20
your email system administrator.

This footnote also confirms that this email message has been checked
for the presence of computer viruses.
**********************************************************************
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------
For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see:
http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/
-----------------------------------------------------------------

From [email protected] Tue Oct 10 02:43:21 2000 -0700
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Tue, 10 Oct 2000 02:43:17 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id CAA12337;
Tue, 10 Oct 2000 02:43:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists3.u.washington.edu ([email protected] [140.142.56.3])
by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id CAA05056;
Tue, 10 Oct 2000 02:43:13 -0700
Received: from host ([email protected] [140.142.56.13])
by lists3.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id CAA04098;
Tue, 10 Oct 2000 02:37:46 -0700
Received: from bp15.u.washington.edu ([email protected] [140.142.15.205])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id CAA75032
for <[email protected]>; Tue, 10 Oct 2000 02:37:06 -0700
Received: from localhost (leibrand@localhost)
by bp15.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id CAA110744;
Tue, 10 Oct 2000 02:37:04 -0700
Message-Id: <Pine.A41.4.29.9999.0010100236080.245106-100000@bp15.u.washington.edu>
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2000 02:37:03 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: [email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
From: Scott Leibrand <[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: command line use of pine
In-Reply-To: <s9e2eb00.038@agent-cxh>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-To: Bridget Nichols <[email protected]>
X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
X-Sender: <[email protected]>
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN

On Tue, 10 Oct 2000, Bridget Nichols wrote:

> Is is possible to run pine as a single command line execution as follows:
>
> pine [email protected] -attach filename ....
>
> without going into Compose and selecting ^XY

Yes, but you have to get Eduardo's "Pine sends e-mail from the command
line" patch first:

http://www.math.washington.edu/~chappa/pine/#commandline

--
Scott Leibrand
[email protected] (Yes, that is a valid address.)
http://students.washington.edu/leibrand
http://www.nwlink.com/~leibrand
* RCW 19.190 notice: This email address is located in Washington State. *
* Unsolicited commercial email may be billed $500 per message. *

From [email protected] Tue Oct 10 05:40:04 2000 -0700
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Tue, 10 Oct 2000 05:40:03 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.1])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id FAA00655;
Tue, 10 Oct 2000 05:40:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists5.u.washington.edu ([email protected] [140.142.56.6])
by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id FAA24042;
Tue, 10 Oct 2000 05:40:01 -0700
Received: from host ([email protected] [140.142.56.13])
by lists5.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id FAA07640;
Tue, 10 Oct 2000 05:39:32 -0700
Received: from mxu2.u.washington.edu (mxu2.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.9])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id FAA154992
for <[email protected]>; Tue, 10 Oct 2000 05:38:51 -0700
Received: from tunku.uady.mx (tunku.uady.mx [148.209.1.1])
by mxu2.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id FAA14651
for <[email protected]>; Tue, 10 Oct 2000 05:38:49 -0700
Received: from localhost (angel@localhost)
by tunku.uady.mx (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id e9ACgEK11509;
Tue, 10 Oct 2000 07:42:18 -0500 (CDT)
Message-Id: <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2000 07:42:14 -0500 (CDT)
Sender: [email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
From: "Angel G. Polanco Rodriguez" <[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
Subject: delete messges problem
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0010100423150.41138-100000@localhost>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-To: Frank Tobin <[email protected]>
X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN

I have a question about Pine:

Working with pine, before quit of pine I marked to delete some mails, then
I quit and delete this messages in pine, but in the next session there are
the sames messages marked in the last session...what hapenned in this
case? please send me comments about this problem.

Thanks in advance

************************************
| Q.B.B.ANGEL G. POLANCO RODRIGUEZ |
| UNIVERSIDAD AUTONOMA DE YUCATAN |
| DIRECCION GENERAL DE |
| DESARROLLO ACADEMICO |
| DEPARTAMENTO DE TELEINFORMATICA|
| CALLE 59 POR AV. ITZAEZ # 490 |
| MERIDA, YUCATAN, MEXICO |
| CODIGO POSTAL : 97 000 |
| TELEFONO:52 (99) 23 74 28 |
| E-mail: [email protected] |
************************************

From [email protected] Tue Oct 10 05:54:30 2000 -0700
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Tue, 10 Oct 2000 05:54:30 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.1])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id FAA24834;
Tue, 10 Oct 2000 05:54:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists3.u.washington.edu ([email protected] [140.142.56.3])
by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id FAA24297;
Tue, 10 Oct 2000 05:54:28 -0700
Received: from host ([email protected] [140.142.56.13])
by lists3.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id FAA05918;
Tue, 10 Oct 2000 05:48:57 -0700
Received: from mxu1.u.washington.edu (mxu1.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.8])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id FAA154982
for <[email protected]>; Tue, 10 Oct 2000 05:48:30 -0700
Received: from skippy.hhnt.org.uk (skippy.hhnt.org.uk [193.32.22.91])
by mxu1.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id FAA11880
for <[email protected]>; Tue, 10 Oct 2000 05:48:28 -0700
Received: from agent-cxh (unverified) by skippy.hhnt.org.uk
(Content Technologies SMTPRS 4.1.5) with SMTP id <[email protected]> for <[email protected]>;
Tue, 10 Oct 2000 14:04:28 +0100
Received: from HHT-Message_Server by agent-cxh
with Novell_GroupWise; Tue, 10 Oct 2000 13:49:31 +0100
Message-Id: <s9e31e6b.093@agent-cxh>
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2000 13:49:29 +0100
Sender: [email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
From: "Bridget Nichols" <[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
Subject: time delay
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
X-To: <[email protected]>
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN

I have a 1minute time delay between "new mail called" and "SIGCHILD raised"=
(under debug level 9) which I cannot account for:

11:18:15.536628 -- gf_pipe: =
11:18:15.536872 done. =
=
11:18:15.537295 new mail called (0 2 2)=
?
???
11:19:16.388939 SIGCHLD raised =
11:19:16.407=
774 cancel_busy_alarm(0) =
11:19:16.408184 =
q_status_message(Sending mail DONE) =20

Is this delay likely to be generated by sendmail or pine?

**********************************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and=20
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they =20
are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify=20
your email system administrator.

This footnote also confirms that this email message has been checked
for the presence of computer viruses.
**********************************************************************
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------
For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see:
http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/
-----------------------------------------------------------------

From [email protected] Tue Oct 10 09:06:44 2000 -0700
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Tue, 10 Oct 2000 09:06:44 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id JAA01584;
Tue, 10 Oct 2000 09:06:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists5.u.washington.edu ([email protected] [140.142.56.6])
by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id JAA13297;
Tue, 10 Oct 2000 09:06:40 -0700
Received: from host ([email protected] [140.142.56.13])
by lists5.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id JAA14469;
Tue, 10 Oct 2000 09:04:29 -0700
Received: from mxu3.u.washington.edu (mxu3.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.7])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id JAA151998
for <[email protected]>; Tue, 10 Oct 2000 09:01:15 -0700
Received: from brm.bireme.br (brm.bireme.br [200.6.42.33])
by mxu3.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id JAA31107
for <[email protected]>; Tue, 10 Oct 2000 09:01:08 -0700
Received: from bireme.br ([200.6.42.43])
by brm.bireme.br (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA17024
for <[email protected]>; Tue, 10 Oct 2000 12:47:57 -0300 (SAT)
Message-Id: <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2000 14:00:13 -0300
Sender: [email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
From: Marcia Ymanaka Barretto <[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
Subject: Problem with speed
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Accept-Language: en
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN

We use pine in a HP_UX machine and sometimes it takes up to 3 minutes to
start working againg when you are in inbox, reading a message or even
browsing the index. Say you start reading a message, and then you press
the down key to walk through the message but it stays like you have not
touched the keyboard; but after a few moments (sometimes 3 minutes) it
continues browsing the message.

Does anyone have a problem like this? Is it a configuration problem?
Does anybody know how to fix it?

Thank you for any suggestion.
Marcia

--
-----------------------------------------------------------------
For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see:
http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/
-----------------------------------------------------------------

From [email protected] Tue Oct 10 09:27:36 2000 -0700
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Tue, 10 Oct 2000 09:27:36 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id JAA21931;
Tue, 10 Oct 2000 09:27:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists3.u.washington.edu ([email protected] [140.142.56.3])
by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id JAA13973;
Tue, 10 Oct 2000 09:27:34 -0700
Received: from host ([email protected] [140.142.56.13])
by lists3.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id JAA15055;
Tue, 10 Oct 2000 09:26:34 -0700
Received: from mxu2.u.washington.edu (mxu2.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.9])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id JAA75182
for <[email protected]>; Tue, 10 Oct 2000 09:23:34 -0700
Received: from helix.mgh.harvard.edu (helix.mgh.harvard.edu [132.183.108.14])
by mxu2.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id JAA14268
for <[email protected]>; Tue, 10 Oct 2000 09:23:33 -0700
Received: from localhost by helix.mgh.harvard.edu (8.8.8/1.1.20.3/31Dec98-1151AM)
id MAA0000005533; Tue, 10 Oct 2000 12:21:50 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2000 12:21:50 -0400 (EDT)
Reply-To: Dennis Gurgul <[email protected]>
Sender: [email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
From: Dennis Gurgul <[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Problem with speed
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-To: Marcia Ymanaka Barretto <[email protected]>
X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>,
Helix Operator <[email protected]>
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN

We had the same problem on a Digital machine, using Pine 3.95. Rebooting
fixed it (for now). Delays weren't as drastic (maybe a minute), but
similar behavior. I'd like to know what causes this also.

Dennis J. Gurgul
Helix Server Management
617.724.3169

On Tue, 10 Oct 2000, Marcia Ymanaka Barretto wrote:

> We use pine in a HP_UX machine and sometimes it takes up to 3 minutes to
> start working againg when you are in inbox, reading a message or even
> browsing the index. Say you start reading a message, and then you press
> the down key to walk through the message but it stays like you have not
> touched the keyboard; but after a few moments (sometimes 3 minutes) it
> continues browsing the message.
>
> Does anyone have a problem like this? Is it a configuration problem?
> Does anybody know how to fix it?
>
> Thank you for any suggestion.
> Marcia
>
> --
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see:
> http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
>

From [email protected] Tue Oct 10 11:24:47 2000 -0700
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Tue, 10 Oct 2000 11:24:45 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.1])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id LAA30564;
Tue, 10 Oct 2000 11:24:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists4.u.washington.edu ([email protected] [140.142.56.2])
by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id LAA01675;
Tue, 10 Oct 2000 11:24:43 -0700
Received: from host ([email protected] [140.142.56.13])
by lists4.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id LAA06875;
Tue, 10 Oct 2000 11:23:34 -0700
Received: from bp15.u.washington.edu ([email protected] [140.142.15.205])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id LAA147448
for <[email protected]>; Tue, 10 Oct 2000 11:21:20 -0700
Received: from localhost (leibrand@localhost)
by bp15.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id LAA230756;
Tue, 10 Oct 2000 11:21:00 -0700
Message-Id: <Pine.A41.4.29.9999.0010101111240.225470-100000@bp15.u.washington.edu>
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2000 11:20:59 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: [email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
From: Scott Leibrand <[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Problem with speed
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-To: Dennis Gurgul <[email protected]>,
Marcia Ymanaka Barretto <[email protected]>
X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
X-Sender: <[email protected]>
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN

Although someone might have some ideas as to why this is occurring,
we'll probably need some debugging info to help determine the cause of
the problem. To help determine the cause of delays like this, run Pine in
debug level 9 by using the -d 9 flag (i.e. "pine -d 9"), and then examine
the .pine-debug1 file.

--
Scott Leibrand
[email protected] (Yes, that is a valid address.)
http://students.washington.edu/leibrand
http://www.nwlink.com/~leibrand
* RCW 19.190 notice: This email address is located in Washington State. *
* Unsolicited commercial email may be billed $500 per message. *

On Tue, 10 Oct 2000, Dennis Gurgul wrote:

>
> We had the same problem on a Digital machine, using Pine 3.95. Rebooting
> fixed it (for now). Delays weren't as drastic (maybe a minute), but
> similar behavior. I'd like to know what causes this also.
>
> Dennis J. Gurgul
> Helix Server Management
> 617.724.3169
>
> On Tue, 10 Oct 2000, Marcia Ymanaka Barretto wrote:
>
> > We use pine in a HP_UX machine and sometimes it takes up to 3 minutes to
> > start working againg when you are in inbox, reading a message or even
> > browsing the index. Say you start reading a message, and then you press
> > the down key to walk through the message but it stays like you have not
> > touched the keyboard; but after a few moments (sometimes 3 minutes) it
> > continues browsing the message.
> >
> > Does anyone have a problem like this? Is it a configuration problem?
> > Does anybody know how to fix it?
> >
> > Thank you for any suggestion.
> > Marcia
> >
> > --
> > -----------------------------------------------------------------
> > For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see:
> > http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/
> > -----------------------------------------------------------------
> >
>
>
>

From [email protected] Tue Oct 10 15:04:31 2000 -0700
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Tue, 10 Oct 2000 15:04:31 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.1])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id PAA04998;
Tue, 10 Oct 2000 15:04:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists5.u.washington.edu ([email protected] [140.142.56.6])
by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id PAA09512;
Tue, 10 Oct 2000 15:04:20 -0700
Received: from host ([email protected] [140.142.56.13])
by lists5.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id OAA09157;
Tue, 10 Oct 2000 14:58:46 -0700
Received: from mxu2.u.washington.edu (mxu2.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.9])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id OAA50964
for <[email protected]>; Tue, 10 Oct 2000 14:45:03 -0700
Received: from brm.bireme.br (brm.bireme.br [200.6.42.33])
by mxu2.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id OAA19742;
Tue, 10 Oct 2000 14:44:44 -0700
Received: from bireme.br ([200.6.42.43])
by brm.bireme.br (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id SAA22091;
Tue, 10 Oct 2000 18:31:36 -0300 (SAT)
Message-Id: <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2000 19:43:54 -0300
Sender: [email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
From: Marcia Ymanaka Barretto <[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Problem with speed
References: <Pine.A41.4.29.9999.0010101111240.225470-100000@bp15.u.washington.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed;
boundary="------------857AAEF75C1D265809085D54"
X-To: Scott Leibrand <[email protected]>
X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
X-Accept-Language: en
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------857AAEF75C1D265809085D54
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Please find attached the .pine-debug1 when the problem occured. It took almost
1:30min to get back to work. Can you tell me something? Thank you. Marcia

Scott Leibrand wrote:

> Although someone might have some ideas as to why this is occurring,
> we'll probably need some debugging info to help determine the cause of
> the problem. To help determine the cause of delays like this, run Pine in
> debug level 9 by using the -d 9 flag (i.e. "pine -d 9"), and then examine
> the .pine-debug1 file.
>
> --
> Scott Leibrand
> [email protected] (Yes, that is a valid address.)
> http://students.washington.edu/leibrand
> http://www.nwlink.com/~leibrand
> * RCW 19.190 notice: This email address is located in Washington State. *
> * Unsolicited commercial email may be billed $500 per message. *
>
> On Tue, 10 Oct 2000, Dennis Gurgul wrote:
>
> >
> > We had the same problem on a Digital machine, using Pine 3.95. Rebooting
> > fixed it (for now). Delays weren't as drastic (maybe a minute), but
> > similar behavior. I'd like to know what causes this also.
> >
> > Dennis J. Gurgul
> > Helix Server Management
> > 617.724.3169
> >
> > On Tue, 10 Oct 2000, Marcia Ymanaka Barretto wrote:
> >
> > > We use pine in a HP_UX machine and sometimes it takes up to 3 minutes to
> > > start working againg when you are in inbox, reading a message or even
> > > browsing the index. Say you start reading a message, and then you press
> > > the down key to walk through the message but it stays like you have not
> > > touched the keyboard; but after a few moments (sometimes 3 minutes) it
> > > continues browsing the message.
> > >
> > > Does anyone have a problem like this? Is it a configuration problem?
> > > Does anybody know how to fix it?
> > >
> > > Thank you for any suggestion.
> > > Marcia
> > >
> > > --
> > > -----------------------------------------------------------------
> > > For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see:
> > > http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/
> > > -----------------------------------------------------------------
> > >
> >
> >
> >

--------------857AAEF75C1D265809085D54
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1;
name="myb-pine-debug1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Disposition: inline;
filename="myb-pine-debug1"

Debug output of the Pine program (debug=9 debug_imap=4). Version 4.10
Tue Oct 10 18:01:32 2000

reading_pinerc "/usr/local/lib/pine.conf"
Open failed: No such file or directory
reading_pinerc "/users/abel/.pinerc"
Read 15324 characters:
folder-collections : mail/[]
feature-list : enable-suspend
sort-key : Arrival/Reverse
character-set : ISO-8859-1
last-time-prune-ques : 100.10
last-version-used : 4.10
default-saved-msg-fo : saved-Oct-98
read_pinerc: pinerc_written = 970463284
reading_pinerc "/usr/local/lib/pine.conf.fixed"
Open failed: No such file or directory
set_current_val(var num=5, expand=1, cmdline=1)
set_current_val(var num=2, expand=1, cmdline=1)
set_current_val(var num=40, expand=1, cmdline=1)
set_current_val(var num=36, expand=1, cmdline=1)
set_current_val(var num=37, expand=1, cmdline=1)
set_current_val(var num=38, expand=1, cmdline=1)
set_current_val(var num=88, expand=1, cmdline=1)
set_current_val(var num=42, expand=1, cmdline=1)
is_list: name=personal-print-command
set_current_val(var num=44, expand=1, cmdline=1)
is_list: name=standard-printer
counted 1 items
set_current_val(var num=41, expand=1, cmdline=1)
set_current_val(var num=45, expand=1, cmdline=1)
set_current_val(var num=47, expand=1, cmdline=1)
set_current_val(var num=48, expand=1, cmdline=1)
set_current_val(var num=50, expand=1, cmdline=1)
set_current_val(var num=51, expand=1, cmdline=1)
set_current_val(var num=52, expand=1, cmdline=1)
set_current_val(var num=53, expand=1, cmdline=1)
set_current_val(var num=49, expand=1, cmdline=1)
set_current_val(var num=55, expand=1, cmdline=1)
set_current_val(var num=11, expand=1, cmdline=1)
set_current_val(var num=13, expand=1, cmdline=1)
set_current_val(var num=15, expand=1, cmdline=1)
set_current_val(var num=16, expand=1, cmdline=1)
set_current_val(var num=33, expand=1, cmdline=1)
is_list: name=editor
set_current_val(var num=34, expand=1, cmdline=1)
set_current_val(var num=39, expand=1, cmdline=1)
set_current_val(var num=82, expand=1, cmdline=1)
is_list: name=url-viewers
set_current_val(var num=3, expand=1, cmdline=1)
is_list: name=smtp-server
set_current_val(var num=22, expand=1, cmdline=1)
is_list: name=default-composer-hdrs
set_current_val(var num=23, expand=1, cmdline=1)
is_list: name=customized-hdrs
set_current_val(var num=56, expand=1, cmdline=1)
set_current_val(var num=58, expand=1, cmdline=1)
is_list: name=display-filters
set_current_val(var num=59, expand=1, cmdline=1)
is_list: name=sending-filters
set_current_val(var num=60, expand=1, cmdline=1)
is_list: name=alt-addresses
set_current_val(var num=61, expand=1, cmdline=1)
is_list: name=addressbook-formats
set_current_val(var num=84, expand=1, cmdline=1)
set_current_val(var num=57, expand=1, cmdline=1)
set_current_val(var num=62, expand=1, cmdline=1)
set_current_val(var num=43, expand=1, cmdline=1)
set_current_val(var num=63, expand=1, cmdline=1)
set_current_val(var num=64, expand=1, cmdline=1)
set_current_val(var num=35, expand=1, cmdline=1)
set_current_val(var num=65, expand=1, cmdline=1)
set_current_val(var num=85, expand=1, cmdline=1)
set_current_val(var num=76, expand=1, cmdline=1)
set_current_val(var num=66, expand=1, cmdline=1)
set_current_val(var num=67, expand=1, cmdline=1)
set_current_val(var num=68, expand=1, cmdline=1)
set_current_val(var num=69, expand=1, cmdline=1)
set_current_val(var num=12, expand=1, cmdline=1)
set_current_val(var num=89, expand=1, cmdline=1)
set_current_val(var num=90, expand=1, cmdline=1)
set_current_val(var num=17, expand=1, cmdline=1)
set_current_val(var num=32, expand=1, cmdline=1)
set_current_val(var num=86, expand=1, cmdline=1)
is_list: name=patterns
set_current_val(var num=18, expand=1, cmdline=1)
is_list: name=global-address-book
set_current_val(var num=19, expand=1, cmdline=1)
is_list: name=address-book
counted 1 items
set_current_val(var num=54, expand=1, cmdline=1)
is_list: name=forced-abook-entry
set_current_val(var num=83, expand=1, cmdline=1)
is_list: name=disable-these-drivers
set_current_val(var num=4, expand=1, cmdline=1)
is_list: name=nntp-server
set_current_val(var num=24, expand=1, cmdline=1)
is_list: name=viewer-hdrs
set_current_val(var num=70, expand=1, cmdline=1)
set_current_val(var num=71, expand=1, cmdline=1)
set_current_val(var num=72, expand=1, cmdline=1)
set_current_val(var num=73, expand=1, cmdline=1)
set_current_val(var num=74, expand=1, cmdline=1)
set_current_val(var num=75, expand=1, cmdline=1)
set_current_val(var num=77, expand=1, cmdline=1)
set_current_val(var num=78, expand=1, cmdline=1)
set_current_val(var num=79, expand=1, cmdline=1)
set_current_val(var num=80, expand=1, cmdline=1)
set_current_val(var num=46, expand=1, cmdline=1)
set_current_val(var num=87, expand=1, cmdline=1)
set_current_val(var num=93, expand=1, cmdline=1)
set_current_val(var num=14, expand=1, cmdline=1)
set_current_val(var num=10, expand=1, cmdline=1)
is_list: name=pruned-folders
set_current_val(var num=9, expand=1, cmdline=1)
is_list: name=incoming-archive-folders
set_current_val(var num=6, expand=1, cmdline=1)
is_list: name=incoming-folders
set_current_val(var num=8, expand=1, cmdline=1)
is_list: name=news-collections
set_current_val(var num=7, expand=1, cmdline=1)
is_list: name=folder-collections
counted 1 items
set_current_val(var num=27, expand=1, cmdline=1)
set_current_val(var num=25, expand=1, cmdline=1)
set_current_val(var num=26, expand=1, cmdline=1)
set_current_val(var num=28, expand=1, cmdline=1)
set_current_val(var num=29, expand=1, cmdline=1)
set_current_val(var num=31, expand=1, cmdline=1)
set_current_val(var num=30, expand=1, cmdline=1)
set_current_val(var num=21, expand=0, cmdline=1)
is_list: name=initial-keystroke-list
======= Current_val options set =======
inbox-path : inbox
folder-collections : mail/[]
default-fcc : sent-mail
default-saved-msg-fo : saved-Oct-98
postponed-folder : postponed-msgs
mail-directory : mail
signature-file : .signature
address-book : .addressbook
feature-list : enable-suspend
saved-msg-name-rule : default-folder
fcc-name-rule : default-fcc
sort-key : Arrival
addrbook-sort-rule : fullname-with-lists-last
folder-sort-rule : alphabetical
character-set : ISO-8859-1
composer-wrap-column : 74
reply-indent-string : >
reply-leadin : default
empty-header-message : Undisclosed recipients
use-only-domain-name : no
printer : attached-to-ansi
standard-printer : lp
last-time-prune-ques : 100.10
last-version-used : 4.10
bugs-fullname : Pine Developers
bugs-address : [email protected]
suggest-fullname : Pine Developers
suggest-address : [email protected]
local-fullname : Local Support
local-address : postmaster
kblock-passwd-count : 1
viewer-overlap : 2
scroll-margin : 0
status-message-delay : 0
mail-check-interval : 150
user-input-timeout : 0
remote-abook-history : 3
elm-style-save : no
header-in-reply : no
feature-level : sapling
old-style-reply : no
save-by-sender : no
======= Command_line_val options set =======
======= User_val options set (/users/abel/.pinerc) =======
folder-collections : mail/[]
default-saved-msg-fo : saved-Oct-98
feature-list : enable-suspend
sort-key : Arrival/Reverse
character-set : ISO-8859-1
last-time-prune-ques : 100.10
last-version-used : 4.10
======= Global_val options set (/usr/local/lib/pine.conf) =======
inbox-path : inbox
folder-collections : mail/[]
default-fcc : sent-mail
default-saved-msg-fo : saved-messages
postponed-folder : postponed-msgs
mail-directory : mail
signature-file : .signature
address-book : .addressbook
saved-msg-name-rule : default-folder
fcc-name-rule : default-fcc
sort-key : arrival
addrbook-sort-rule : fullname-with-lists-last
folder-sort-rule : alphabetical
composer-wrap-column : 74
reply-indent-string : >
reply-leadin : default
empty-header-message : Undisclosed recipients
use-only-domain-name : no
printer : attached-to-ansi
standard-printer : lp
bugs-fullname : Pine Developers
bugs-address : [email protected]
suggest-fullname : Pine Developers
suggest-address : [email protected]
local-fullname : Local Support
local-address : postmaster
kblock-passwd-count : 1
viewer-overlap : 2
scroll-margin : 0
status-message-delay : 0
mail-check-interval : 150
user-input-timeout : 0
remote-abook-history : 3
elm-style-save : no
header-in-reply : no
feature-level : sapling
old-style-reply : no
save-by-sender : no
======= Fixed_val options set (NO pine.conf.fixed) =======
========== Feature settings ==========
no-compose-cut-from-cursor
no-compose-maps-delete-key-to-ctrl-d
no-compose-rejects-unqualified-addrs
no-compose-send-offers-first-filter
no-enable-alternate-editor-cmd
no-enable-alternate-editor-implicitly
no-enable-search-and-replace
no-enable-sigdashes
no-quell-dead-letter-on-cancel
no-quell-user-lookup-in-passwd-file
no-enable-reply-indent-string-editing
no-include-attachments-in-reply
no-include-header-in-reply
no-include-text-in-reply
no-reply-always-uses-reply-to
no-signature-at-bottom
no-strip-from-sigdashes-on-reply
no-enable-8bit-esmtp-negotiation
no-enable-background-sending
no-enable-delivery-status-notification
no-enable-verbose-smtp-posting
no-fcc-on-bounce
no-fcc-only-without-confirm
no-fcc-without-attachments
no-use-sender-not-x-sender
no-combined-subdirectory-display
no-combined-folder-display
no-enable-dot-folders
no-enable-incoming-folders
no-enable-lame-list-mode
no-expanded-view-of-folders
no-quell-empty-directories
no-separate-folder-and-directory-entries
no-single-column-folder-list
no-vertical-folder-list
no-combined-addrbook-display
no-expanded-view-of-addressbooks
no-expanded-view-of-distribution-lists
no-auto-open-next-unread
no-delete-skips-deleted
no-enable-cruise-mode
no-enable-cruise-mode-delete
no-tab-visits-next-new-message-only
no-enable-msg-view-attachments
no-enable-msg-view-urls
no-enable-msg-view-web-hostnames
no-enable-msg-view-addresses
no-enable-msg-view-forced-arrows
no-pass-control-characters-as-is
no-compose-sets-newsgroup-without-confirm
no-enable-8bit-nntp-posting
no-news-approximates-new-status
no-news-deletes-across-groups
no-news-post-without-validation
no-news-read-in-newsrc-order
no-enable-print-via-y-command
no-print-offers-custom-cmd-prompt
no-print-includes-from-line
no-print-index-enabled
no-print-formfeed-between-messages
no-enable-aggregate-command-set
no-enable-arrow-navigation
no-enable-arrow-navigation-relaxed
no-enable-bounce-cmd
no-enable-exit-via-lessthan-command
no-enable-flag-cmd
no-enable-flag-screen-implicitly
no-enable-full-header-cmd
no-enable-goto-in-file-browser
no-enable-jump-shortcut
no-enable-partial-match-lists
no-enable-tab-completion
no-enable-unix-pipe-cmd
no-allow-talk
no-assume-slow-link
no-auto-move-read-msgs
no-auto-unzoom-after-apply
no-auto-zoom-after-select
no-confirm-role-even-for-default
no-enable-dot-files
no-enable-fast-recent-test
no-enable-mail-check-cue
no-enable-mouse-in-xterm
no-enable-newmail-in-xterm-icon
enable-suspend
no-expunge-without-confirm
no-expunge-without-confirm-everywhere
no-preserve-start-stop-characters
no-quell-folder-internal-msg
no-quell-lock-failure-warnings
no-quell-status-message-beeping
no-quit-without-confirm
no-save-will-advance
no-save-will-not-delete
no-save-will-quote-leading-froms
no-select-without-confirm
no-show-cursor
no-show-plain-text-internally
no-show-selected-in-boldface
no-use-current-dir
no-use-function-keys
no-use-subshell-for-suspend
no-allow-changing-from
no-disable-config-cmd
no-disable-busy-alarm
no-disable-keyboard-lock-cmd
no-disable-keymenu
no-disable-password-cmd
no-disable-roles-setup-cmd
no-disable-roles-sig-edit
no-disable-roles-template-edit
no-disable-take-last-comma-first
no-disable-signature-edit-cmd
no-quell-imap-envelope-update
no-quell-partial-fetching
no-save-aggregates-copy-sequence
no-termdef-takes-precedence
Userid: abel
Fullname: "Abel L. Packer"
User domain name being used ""
Local Domain name being used "bireme.br"
Host name being used "brm.bireme.br"
Mail Domain name being used (by c-client too)"brm.bireme.br"
Context mail/%s: serv:"", ref:"", view: ""
init_signals()
new win size -----<24 80>------
Terminal type: vt100
Scroll mode: InsertDelete
Context mail/%s: serv:"", ref:"", view: ""

***** context mail/%s
LABEL: Local folders in mail/
1) inbox
set_titlebar - style: 1 current message cnt:1 current_pl: 0 total_pl: 0
0 ? Help 0
1 O OTHER CMDS 0
2 (null) (null) 14
3 > [ListFldrs 13
4 P PrevCmd 27
5 N NextCmd 27
6 (null) (null) 40
7 (null) (null) 40
8 R RelNotes 53
9 K KBLock 53
10 (null) (null) 66
11 (null) (null) 66
row: -2, real_row: 22, column: 0
About to open folder "INBOX" inbox: "INBOX"
busy_alarm(1, Opening "INBOX", 00000000, 1)
q_status_message(Opening "INBOX" )
output_message(Opening "INBOX" )
STATUS cmd:120, max:1, min0
Done with IMAP critical on /var/mail/abel
=== mm_exists(1473,/var/mail/abel) called ===
Done with IMAP critical on /var/mail/abel
Opened folder 4003a160 "/var/mail/abel" (context: "mail/%s")
Opened folder "/var/mail/abel" with 1473 messages
cancel_busy_alarm(0)
q_status_message(Opening "INBOX" DONE)
comatose(1473) returns:"1,473"
q_status_message(Folder "INBOX" opened with 1,473 message)
Sorting by Arrival/reverse
First_sorted_flagged returning winner = 1
==== expire_mail called ====
same_stream: /users/abel/.pine-interrupted-mail == /var/mail/abel
same_stream: no dice
busy_alarm(1, Busy, 00000000, 0)
cancel_busy_alarm(-1)

---- MAIN_MENU_SCREEN ----
new mail called (0 2 3)
check_point(VeryBadTime)
Mail_Ping(mail_stream): Tue Oct 10 18:01:41 2000

New mail checked
Ping complete: Tue Oct 10 18:01:41 2000

******** new mail returning -1 ********
set_titlebar - style: 1 current message cnt:1 current_pl: 0 total_pl: 0
comatose(1473) returns:"1,473"
STATUS: diff:-8, displayed: 971211693, now: 971211701
d_q_status_message(Opening "INBOX" )
d_q_status_message(Opening "INBOX" DONE)
output_message(Folder "INBOX" opened with 1,473 messages)
STATUS cmd:120, max:4, min0
cancel_busy_alarm(-1)
Read char returning: 105 i
Read command returning: 105 i
New_mail_count zeroed

---- MAIL INDEX ----

---- INDEX MANAGER ----
new mail called (0 2 1)
set_titlebar - style: 2 current message cnt:1 current_pl: 0 total_pl: 0
comatose(1) returns:"1"
comatose(1473) returns:"1,473"
=== setup_header_widths(1473) ===
=== format_index_line(1,1473) ===
=== setup_header_widths(1473) ===
Parse date: "Tue, 10 Oct 2000 17:12:12 -0700" to.. hours_off_gmt:-7 min_off_gmt:0
Parse date: wkday:2 month:10 year:2000 day:10 hour:17 min:12 sec:12
comatose(1588) returns:"1,588"
INDEX(4006dab0) -->+ N 1 Oct 10 Jorge Walters Gast (1,588) Varios... <-- (80), 235563716>
=== format_index_line(2,1472) ===
Parse date: "Tue, 10 Oct 2000 17:04:22 -0700" to.. hours_off_gmt:-7 min_off_gmt:0
Parse date: wkday:2 month:10 year:2000 day:10 hour:17 min:4 sec:22
comatose(1635) returns:"1,635"
INDEX(4006db08) -->+ N 2 Oct 10 Jorge Walters Gast (1,635) Reunion con Anna Maria <-- (80), 230254777>
=== format_index_line(3,1471) ===
Parse date: "Tue, 10 Oct 2000 17:49:33 -0300" to.. hours_off_gmt:-3 min_off_gmt:0
Parse date: wkday:2 month:10 year:2000 day:10 hour:17 min:49 sec:33
comatose(3009) returns:"3,009"
INDEX(4006db60) -->+ N 3 Oct 10 Tardelli, Adalbert (3,009) FW: III Reuni�n del Grupo Internacio<-- (80), 40158192>
=== format_index_line(4,1470) ===
Parse date: "Tue, 10 Oct 2000 17:12:54 -0300" to.. hours_off_gmt:-3 min_off_gmt:0
Parse date: wkday:2 month:10 year:2000 day:10 hour:17 min:12 sec:54
comatose(7038) returns:"7,038"
INDEX(4006dbb8) -->+ N 4 Oct 10 #BIR:DIR (7,038) FW: PAHO OBSERVES WORLD MENTAL HEALT<-- (80), 97991983>
=== format_index_line(5,1469) ===
Parse date: "Tue, 10 Oct 2000 14:06:00 -0600" to.. hours_off_gmt:-6 min_off_gmt:0
Parse date: wkday:2 month:10 year:2000 day:10 hour:14 min:6 sec:0
comatose(2256) returns:"2,256"
INDEX(4006dc10) --> N 5 Oct 10 Bert Hiddink (2,256) Re: manual about wxis in english <-- (80), 224982074>
=== format_index_line(6,1468) ===
Parse date: "Tue, 10 Oct 2000 14:41:15 -0300" to.. hours_off_gmt:-3 min_off_gmt:0
Parse date: wkday:2 month:10 year:2000 day:10 hour:14 min:41 sec:15
comatose(9153) returns:"9,153"
INDEX(4006dc68) --> N 6 Oct 10 Reforme (9,153) Montevideo entre todos (II) <-- (80), 180722685>
=== format_index_line(7,1467) ===
Parse date: "Tue, 10 Oct 2000 17:30:06 -0300" to.. hours_off_gmt:-3 min_off_gmt:0
Parse date: wkday:2 month:10 year:2000 day:10 hour:17 min:30 sec:6
comatose(47433) returns:"47,433"
INDEX(4006dcc0) --> N 7 Oct 10 Mariana Rocha Bioj (47,433) Revision SciELO CR <-- (80), 158625056>
=== format_index_line(8,1466) ===
Parse date: "Tue, 10 Oct 2000 17:13:18 -0300" to.. hours_off_gmt:-3 min_off_gmt:0
Parse date: wkday:2 month:10 year:2000 day:10 hour:17 min:13 sec:18
comatose(200) returns:"200"
INDEX(4006dd18) --> N 8 Oct 10 Mariana Rocha Bioj (200K) SciELO and BMJ <-- (80), 145026443>
=== format_index_line(9,1465) ===
Parse date: "Tue, 10 Oct 2000 17:09:52 -0300" to.. hours_off_gmt:-3 min_off_gmt:0
Parse date: wkday:2 month:10 year:2000 day:10 hour:17 min:9 sec:52
comatose(2533) returns:"2,533"
INDEX(4006dd70) --> N 9 Oct 10 Marcia Ymanaka Bar (2,533) Re: 2001 Indexing Orientation (fwd) <-- (80), 194151115>
=== format_index_line(10,1464) ===
Parse date: "Tue, 10 Oct 2000 21:09:55 +0200" to.. hours_off_gmt:2 min_off_gmt:0
Parse date: wkday:2 month:10 year:2000 day:10 hour:21 min:9 sec:55
comatose(58742) returns:"58,742"
INDEX(4006ddc8) --> N 10 Oct 10 Declan Butler, Nat (58,742) Extension of deadline <-- (80), 86150237>
=== format_index_line(11,1463) ===
Parse date: "Tue, 10 Oct 2000 16:04:00 -0300" to.. hours_off_gmt:-3 min_off_gmt:0
Parse date: wkday:2 month:10 year:2000 day:10 hour:16 min:4 sec:0
comatose(91837) returns:"91,837"
INDEX(4006de20) -->+ N 11 Oct 10 #BIR:DIR (91,837) FW: WUN Monthly Report Aug-Sept 2000<-- (80), 135162502>
=== format_index_line(12,1462) ===
Parse date: "Tue, 10 Oct 2000 16:03:49 -0300" to.. hours_off_gmt:-3 min_off_gmt:0
Parse date: wkday:2 month:10 year:2000 day:10 hour:16 min:3 sec:49
comatose(39688) returns:"39,688"
INDEX(4006de78) -->+ N 12 Oct 10 #BIR:DIR (39,688) FW: JC E-Mail, 1645, de 10 de outubr<-- (80), 125950554>
=== format_index_line(13,1461) ===
Parse date: "Tue, 10 Oct 2000 16:42:34 -0300" to.. hours_off_gmt:-3 min_off_gmt:0
Parse date: wkday:2 month:10 year:2000 day:10 hour:16 min:42 sec:34
comatose(2720) returns:"2,720"
INDEX(4006ded0) -->+ N 13 Oct 10 Marcia Ymanaka Bar (2,720) PINE <-- (80), 124658240>
=== format_index_line(14,1460) ===
Parse date: "Tue, 10 Oct 2000 15:47:03 -0300" to.. hours_off_gmt:-3 min_off_gmt:0
Parse date: wkday:2 month:10 year:2000 day:10 hour:15 min:47 sec:3
comatose(2326) returns:"2,326"
INDEX(4006df28) -->+ N 14 Oct 10 Packer, Abel Laert (2,326) FW: Indexing of SciELO journals <-- (80), 24932232>
=== format_index_line(15,1459) ===
Parse date: "Tue, 10 Oct 2000 15:41:39 -0300" to.. hours_off_gmt:-3 min_off_gmt:0
Parse date: wkday:2 month:10 year:2000 day:10 hour:15 min:41 sec:39
comatose(7112) returns:"7,112"
INDEX(4006df80) -->+ N 15 Oct 10 #BIR:DIR (7,112) FW: Am�rica Latina y el Caribe profu<-- (80), 122788006>
=== format_index_line(16,1458) ===
Parse date: "Tue, 10 Oct 2000 14:56:04 -0300 (SAT)" to.. hours_off_gmt:-3 min_off_gmt:0
Parse date: wkday:2 month:10 year:2000 day:10 hour:14 min:56 sec:4
comatose(466) returns:"466"
INDEX(4006dfd8) -->+ N 16 Oct 10 To: Abel L. Packer (466) Responder ana Maria <-- (80), 257708824>
=== format_index_line(17,1457) ===
Parse date: "Tue, 10 Oct 2000 15:43:49 -0300" to.. hours_off_gmt:-3 min_off_gmt:0
Parse date: wkday:2 month:10 year:2000 day:10 hour:15 min:43 sec:49
comatose(458) returns:"458"
INDEX(4006e030) -->+ N 17 Oct 10 Mariana Rocha Bioj (458K) Documentacao DTD <-- (80), 235132229>
=== format_index_line(18,1456) ===
Parse date: "Tue, 10 Oct 2000 15:45:11 -0300" to.. hours_off_gmt:-3 min_off_gmt:0
Parse date: wkday:2 month:10 year:2000 day:10 hour:15 min:45 sec:11
comatose(878) returns:"878"
INDEX(4006e088) -->+ 18 Oct 10 Lewis Joel Greene (878) bmj <-- (80), 29585361>
=== format_index_line(19,1455) ===
Parse date: "Tue, 10 Oct 2000 15:40:36 -0300" to.. hours_off_gmt:-3 min_off_gmt:0
Parse date: wkday:2 month:10 year:2000 day:10 hour:15 min:40 sec:36
comatose(2323) returns:"2,323"
INDEX(4006e0e0) -->+ N 19 Oct 10 Lewis Joel Greene (2,323) Processo 00/0787-0 <-- (80), 66505608>
0 ? Help 0
1 O OTHER CMDS 0
2 < FldrList 13
3 > [ViewMsg] 13
4 P PrevMsg 26
5 N NextMsg 26
6 - PrevPage 42
7 Spc NextPage 40
8 D Delete 53
9 U Undelete 53
10 R Reply 66
11 F Forward 66
row: -2, real_row: 22, column: 0
STATUS: diff:-3, displayed: 971211701, now: 971211704
d_q_status_message(Folder "INBOX" opened with 1,473 message)
Clearing status line
STATUS cmd:120, max:-1, min-1
cancel_busy_alarm(-1)
Read char returning: 32
Read command returning: 32
New_mail_count zeroed
new mail called (0 2 1)
comatose(20) returns:"20"
comatose(1473) returns:"1,473"
=== format_index_line(20,1454) ===
Parse date: "Tue, 10 Oct 2000 14:07:33 -0300" to.. hours_off_gmt:-3 min_off_gmt:0
Parse date: wkday:2 month:10 year:2000 day:10 hour:14 min:7 sec:33
comatose(143) returns:"143"
INDEX(4006e138) -->+ N 20 Oct 10 #BIR:DIR (143K) FW: Agreement with Middlesex Univers<-- (80), 189881479>
=== format_index_line(21,1453) ===
Parse date: "Tue, 10 Oct 2000 13:31:56 -0300 (SAT)" to.. hours_off_gmt:-3 min_off_gmt:0
Parse date: wkday:2 month:10 year:2000 day:10 hour:13 min:31 sec:56
comatose(621) returns:"621"
INDEX(4006e190) -->+ 21 Oct 10 Roberto Souto Pere (621) aditivo para fapesp <-- (80), 20846348>
=== format_index_line(22,1452) ===
Parse date: "Tue, 10 Oct 2000 11:19:41 -0300" to.. hours_off_gmt:-3 min_off_gmt:0
Parse date: wkday:2 month:10 year:2000 day:10 hour:11 min:19 sec:41
comatose(4355) returns:"4,355"
INDEX(4006e1e8) --> N 22 Oct 10 Reforme (4,355) V Cong.CLAD: Intervencion Panel 11 <-- (80), 135627198>
=== format_index_line(23,1451) ===
Parse date: "Tue, 10 Oct 2000 14:29:18 -0200 (BRDT)" to.. hours_off_gmt:-2 min_off_gmt:0
Parse date: wkday:2 month:10 year:2000 day:10 hour:14 min:29 sec:18
comatose(2464) returns:"2,464"
INDEX(4006e240) --> N 23 Oct 10 Hernani Luiz Vila (2,464) Apresenta��o e d�vida <-- (80), 231703483>
=== format_index_line(24,1450) ===
Parse date: "Tue, 10 Oct 2000 13:40:42 +0100" to.. hours_off_gmt:1 min_off_gmt:0
Parse date: wkday:2 month:10 year:2000 day:10 hour:13 min:40 sec:42
comatose(2152) returns:"2,152"
INDEX(4006e298) -->+ 24 Oct 10 Dora Pratt (2,152) noticias <-- (80), 252630435>
=== format_index_line(25,1449) ===
Parse date: "Tue, 10 Oct 2000 09:43:24 -0600" to.. hours_off_gmt:-6 min_off_gmt:0
Parse date: wkday:2 month:10 year:2000 day:10 hour:9 min:43 sec:24
comatose(3994) returns:"3,994"
INDEX(4006e2f0) -->+ N 25 Oct 10 Polo, Maria del Ro (3,994) Nuevo bebe!!! <-- (80), 196105489>
=== format_index_line(26,1448) ===
Parse date: "Tue, 10 Oct 2000 11:32:02 -0400" to.. hours_off_gmt:-4 min_off_gmt:0
Parse date: wkday:2 month:10 year:2000 day:10 hour:11 min:32 sec:2
comatose(5231) returns:"5,231"
INDEX(4006e348) --> N 26 Oct 10 Jana Bradley (5,231) Travel Award to ALA in San Francisco<-- (80), 164004389>
=== format_index_line(27,1447) ===
Parse date: "Tue, 10 Oct 2000 11:16:46 -0400" to.. hours_off_gmt:-4 min_off_gmt:0
Parse date: wkday:2 month:10 year:2000 day:10 hour:11 min:16 sec:46
comatose(7518) returns:"7,518"
INDEX(4006e3a0) --> N 27 Oct 10 Roberta Segreti (7,518) Fwd: ALA San Francisco Student Trave<-- (80), 81677039>
=== format_index_line(28,1446) ===
Parse date: "Tue, 10 Oct 2000 12:07:35 -0300" to.. hours_off_gmt:-3 min_off_gmt:0
Parse date: wkday:2 month:10 year:2000 day:10 hour:12 min:7 sec:35
comatose(4746) returns:"4,746"
INDEX(4006e3f8) -->+ N 28 Oct 10 Oliveira, Cristian (4,746) RE: Consultora Legislacao - Alimento<-- (80), 21550823>
=== format_index_line(29,1445) ===
Parse date: "Tue, 10 Oct 2000 11:41:27 -0300 (SAT)" to.. hours_off_gmt:-3 min_off_gmt:0
Parse date: wkday:2 month:10 year:2000 day:10 hour:11 min:41 sec:27
comatose(1695) returns:"1,695"
INDEX(4006e450) -->+ N 29 Oct 10 Ana Maria C. Arauj (1,695) Re: sugestao <-- (80), 103860853>
=== format_index_line(30,1444) ===
Parse date: "Tue, 10 Oct 2000 11:56:23 -0300" to.. hours_off_gmt:-3 min_off_gmt:0
Parse date: wkday:2 month:10 year:2000 day:10 hour:11 min:56 sec:23
comatose(3738) returns:"3,738"
INDEX(4006e4a8) --> N 30 Oct 10 Taruhn, Rosane (BI (3,738) [Gerentes-l] RE: [Gerentes-l] Re: su<-- (80), 104713684>
=== format_index_line(31,1443) ===
Parse date: "Tue, 10 Oct 2000 11:37:06 -0300" to.. hours_off_gmt:-3 min_off_gmt:0
Parse date: wkday:2 month:10 year:2000 day:10 hour:11 min:37 sec:6
comatose(2050) returns:"2,050"
INDEX(4006e500) -->+ N 31 Oct 10 Castro, Elenice de (2,050) mensagem do Pedro <-- (80), 127876467>
=== format_index_line(32,1442) ===
Parse date: "Tue, 10 Oct 2000 06:49:39 -0700 (PDT)" to.. hours_off_gmt:-7 min_off_gmt:0
Parse date: wkday:2 month:10 year:2000 day:10 hour:6 min:49 sec:39
comatose(8003) returns:"8,003"
INDEX(4006e558) -->+ N 32 Oct 10 Pedro Urra (8,003) Fwd: Returned mail: Can't create out<-- (80), 224804631>
=== format_index_line(33,1441) ===
Parse date: "Tue, 10 Oct 2000 10:33:52 -0300 (SAT)" to.. hours_off_gmt:-3 min_off_gmt:0
Parse date: wkday:2 month:10 year:2000 day:10 hour:10 min:33 sec:52
comatose(860) returns:"860"
INDEX(4006e5b0) -->+ N 33 Oct 10 To: Abel L. Packer (860) Direccion de correo (fwd) <-- (80), 197679491>
=== format_index_line(34,1440) ===
Parse date: "Tue, 10 Oct 2000 10:31:32 -0300 (SAT)" to.. hours_off_gmt:-3 min_off_gmt:0
Parse date: wkday:2 month:10 year:2000 day:10 hour:10 min:31 sec:32
comatose(2378) returns:"2,378"
INDEX(4006e608) --> N 34 Oct 10 To: Ana Maria C. A (2,378) [Gerentes-l] Re: sugestao <-- (80), 262852050>
=== format_index_line(35,1439) ===
Parse date: "Tue, 10 Oct 2000 10:48:12 -0300" to.. hours_off_gmt:-3 min_off_gmt:0
Parse date: wkday:2 month:10 year:2000 day:10 hour:10 min:48 sec:12
comatose(3737) returns:"3,737"
INDEX(4006e660) -->+ N 35 Oct 10 #BIR:DIR (3,737) FW: Boletim Peri�dico Empresa - Ano <-- (80), 83007618>
=== format_index_line(36,1438) ===
Parse date: "Tue, 10 Oct 2000 09:16:08 EDT" to.. hours_off_gmt:-4 min_off_gmt:0
Parse date: wkday:2 month:10 year:2000 day:10 hour:9 min:16 sec:8
comatose(2563) returns:"2,563"
INDEX(4006e6b8) --> N 36 Oct 10 [email protected] (2,563) (no subject) <-- (80), 243080280>
=== format_index_line(37,1437) ===
Parse date: "Tue, 10 Oct 2000 11:01:38 -0300" to.. hours_off_gmt:-3 min_off_gmt:0
Parse date: wkday:2 month:10 year:2000 day:10 hour:11 min:1 sec:38
comatose(1538) returns:"1,538"
INDEX(4006e710) -->+ N 37 Oct 10 Marcia Ymanaka Bar (1,538) [Fwd: Re: Fw: Listserver for the Fri<-- (80), 43994603>
=== format_index_line(38,1436) ===
Parse date: "Tue, 10 Oct 2000 10:00:33 -0300" to.. hours_off_gmt:-3 min_off_gmt:0
Parse date: wkday:2 month:10 year:2000 day:10 hour:10 min:0 sec:33
comatose(1348) returns:"1,348"
INDEX(4006e768) --> N 38 Oct 10 Julio A moutinho (1,348) Re: Contents of file: 200.134.245.11<-- (80), 2629033>
STATUS cmd:32, max:-1, min-1
cancel_busy_alarm(-1)
Read char returning: 2068 Left Arrow
Read command returning: 2068 Left Arrow
New_mail_count zeroed
q_status_message(Command "Left Arrow" not defined for thi)
new mail called (0 2 1)
Hit: Returning 4006e138 -> <+ N 20 Oct 10 #BIR:DIR (143K) FW: Agreement with Middlesex Univers (80), 189881479>
Hit: Returning 4006e190 -> <+ 21 Oct 10 Roberto Souto Pere (621) aditivo para fapesp (80), 20846348>
Hit: Returning 4006e1e8 -> < N 22 Oct 10 Reforme (4,355) V Cong.CLAD: Intervencion Panel 11 (80), 135627198>
Hit: Returning 4006e240 -> < N 23 Oct 10 Hernani Luiz Vila (2,464) Apresenta��o e d�vida (80), 231703483>
Hit: Returning 4006e298 -> <+ 24 Oct 10 Dora Pratt (2,152) noticias (80), 252630435>
Hit: Returning 4006e2f0 -> <+ N 25 Oct 10 Polo, Maria del Ro (3,994) Nuevo bebe!!! (80), 196105489>
Hit: Returning 4006e348 -> < N 26 Oct 10 Jana Bradley (5,231) Travel Award to ALA in San Francisco (80), 164004389>
Hit: Returning 4006e3a0 -> < N 27 Oct 10 Roberta Segreti (7,518) Fwd: ALA San Francisco Student Trave (80), 81677039>
Hit: Returning 4006e3f8 -> <+ N 28 Oct 10 Oliveira, Cristian (4,746) RE: Consultora Legislacao - Alimento (80), 21550823>
Hit: Returning 4006e450 -> <+ N 29 Oct 10 Ana Maria C. Arauj (1,695) Re: sugestao (80), 103860853>
Hit: Returning 4006e4a8 -> < N 30 Oct 10 Taruhn, Rosane (BI (3,738) [Gerentes-l] RE: [Gerentes-l] Re: su (80), 104713684>
Hit: Returning 4006e500 -> <+ N 31 Oct 10 Castro, Elenice de (2,050) mensagem do Pedro (80), 127876467>
Hit: Returning 4006e558 -> <+ N 32 Oct 10 Pedro Urra (8,003) Fwd: Returned mail: Can't create out (80), 224804631>
Hit: Returning 4006e5b0 -> <+ N 33 Oct 10 To: Abel L. Packer (860) Direccion de correo (fwd) (80), 197679491>
Hit: Returning 4006e608 -> < N 34 Oct 10 To: Ana Maria C. A (2,378) [Gerentes-l] Re: sugestao (80), 262852050>
Hit: Returning 4006e660 -> <+ N 35 Oct 10 #BIR:DIR (3,737) FW: Boletim Peri�dico Empresa - Ano (80), 83007618>
Hit: Returning 4006e6b8 -> < N 36 Oct 10 [email protected] (2,563) (no subject) (80), 243080280>
Hit: Returning 4006e710 -> <+ N 37 Oct 10 Marcia Ymanaka Bar (1,538) [Fwd: Re: Fw: Listserver for the Fri (80), 43994603>
Hit: Returning 4006e768 -> < N 38 Oct 10 Julio A moutinho (1,348) Re: Contents of file: 200.134.245.11 (80), 2629033>
output_message(Command "Left Arrow" not defined for this screen. Use ? for help)
STATUS cmd:2068, max:2, min0
cancel_busy_alarm(-1)
Read char returning: 2068 Left Arrow
Read command returning: 2068 Left Arrow
New_mail_count zeroed
new mail called (0 2 1)
Hit: Returning 4006e138 -> <+ N 20 Oct 10 #BIR:DIR (143K) FW: Agreement with Middlesex Univers (80), 189881479>
Hit: Returning 4006e190 -> <+ 21 Oct 10 Roberto Souto Pere (621) aditivo para fapesp (80), 20846348>
Hit: Returning 4006e1e8 -> < N 22 Oct 10 Reforme (4,355) V Cong.CLAD: Intervencion Panel 11 (80), 135627198>
Hit: Returning 4006e240 -> < N 23 Oct 10 Hernani Luiz Vila (2,464) Apresenta��o e d�vida (80), 231703483>
Hit: Returning 4006e298 -> <+ 24 Oct 10 Dora Pratt (2,152) noticias (80), 252630435>
Hit: Returning 4006e2f0 -> <+ N 25 Oct 10 Polo, Maria del Ro (3,994) Nuevo bebe!!! (80), 196105489>
Hit: Returning 4006e348 -> < N 26 Oct 10 Jana Bradley (5,231) Travel Award to ALA in San Francisco (80), 164004389>
Hit: Returning 4006e3a0 -> < N 27 Oct 10 Roberta Segreti (7,518) Fwd: ALA San Francisco Student Trave (80), 81677039>
Hit: Returning 4006e3f8 -> <+ N 28 Oct 10 Oliveira, Cristian (4,746) RE: Consultora Legislacao - Alimento (80), 21550823>
Hit: Returning 4006e450 -> <+ N 29 Oct 10 Ana Maria C. Arauj (1,695) Re: sugestao (80), 103860853>
Hit: Returning 4006e4a8 -> < N 30 Oct 10 Taruhn, Rosane (BI (3,738) [Gerentes-l] RE: [Gerentes-l] Re: su (80), 104713684>
Hit: Returning 4006e500 -> <+ N 31 Oct 10 Castro, Elenice de (2,050) mensagem do Pedro (80), 127876467>
Hit: Returning 4006e558 -> <+ N 32 Oct 10 Pedro Urra (8,003) Fwd: Returned mail: Can't create out (80), 224804631>
Hit: Returning 4006e5b0 -> <+ N 33 Oct 10 To: Abel L. Packer (860) Direccion de correo (fwd) (80), 197679491>
Hit: Returning 4006e608 -> < N 34 Oct 10 To: Ana Maria C. A (2,378) [Gerentes-l] Re: sugestao (80), 262852050>
Hit: Returning 4006e660 -> <+ N 35 Oct 10 #BIR:DIR (3,737) FW: Boletim Peri�dico Empresa - Ano (80), 83007618>
Hit: Returning 4006e6b8 -> < N 36 Oct 10 [email protected] (2,563) (no subject) (80), 243080280>
Hit: Returning 4006e710 -> <+ N 37 Oct 10 Marcia Ymanaka Bar (1,538) [Fwd: Re: Fw: Listserver for the Fri (80), 43994603>
Hit: Returning 4006e768 -> < N 38 Oct 10 Julio A moutinho (1,348) Re: Contents of file: 200.134.245.11 (80), 2629033>
output_message(Command "Left Arrow" not defined for this screen. Use ? for help)
STATUS cmd:2068, max:2, min0
cancel_busy_alarm(-1)
Read char returning: 2066 Down Arrow
Read command returning: 2066 Down Arrow
New_mail_count zeroed

- process_cmd((700)�) -
new mail called (0 2 1)
comatose(21) returns:"21"
Hit: Returning 4006e138 -> <+ N 20 Oct 10 #BIR:DIR (143K) FW: Agreement with Middlesex Univers (80), 189881479>
Hit: Returning 4006e190 -> <+ 21 Oct 10 Roberto Souto Pere (621) aditivo para fapesp (80), 20846348>
Hit: Returning 4006e1e8 -> < N 22 Oct 10 Reforme (4,355) V Cong.CLAD: Intervencion Panel 11 (80), 135627198>
Hit: Returning 4006e240 -> < N 23 Oct 10 Hernani Luiz Vila (2,464) Apresenta��o e d�vida (80), 231703483>
Hit: Returning 4006e298 -> <+ 24 Oct 10 Dora Pratt (2,152) noticias (80), 252630435>
Hit: Returning 4006e2f0 -> <+ N 25 Oct 10 Polo, Maria del Ro (3,994) Nuevo bebe!!! (80), 196105489>
Hit: Returning 4006e348 -> < N 26 Oct 10 Jana Bradley (5,231) Travel Award to ALA in San Francisco (80), 164004389>
Hit: Returning 4006e3a0 -> < N 27 Oct 10 Roberta Segreti (7,518) Fwd: ALA San Francisco Student Trave (80), 81677039>
Hit: Returning 4006e3f8 -> <+ N 28 Oct 10 Oliveira, Cristian (4,746) RE: Consultora Legislacao - Alimento (80), 21550823>
Hit: Returning 4006e450 -> <+ N 29 Oct 10 Ana Maria C. Arauj (1,695) Re: sugestao (80), 103860853>
Hit: Returning 4006e4a8 -> < N 30 Oct 10 Taruhn, Rosane (BI (3,738) [Gerentes-l] RE: [Gerentes-l] Re: su (80), 104713684>
Hit: Returning 4006e500 -> <+ N 31 Oct 10 Castro, Elenice de (2,050) mensagem do Pedro (80), 127876467>
Hit: Returning 4006e558 -> <+ N 32 Oct 10 Pedro Urra (8,003) Fwd: Returned mail: Can't create out (80), 224804631>
Hit: Returning 4006e5b0 -> <+ N 33 Oct 10 To: Abel L. Packer (860) Direccion de correo (fwd) (80), 197679491>
Hit: Returning 4006e608 -> < N 34 Oct 10 To: Ana Maria C. A (2,378) [Gerentes-l] Re: sugestao (80), 262852050>
Hit: Returning 4006e660 -> <+ N 35 Oct 10 #BIR:DIR (3,737) FW: Boletim Peri�dico Empresa - Ano (80), 83007618>
Hit: Returning 4006e6b8 -> < N 36 Oct 10 [email protected] (2,563) (no subject) (80), 243080280>
Hit: Returning 4006e710 -> <+ N 37 Oct 10 Marcia Ymanaka Bar (1,538) [Fwd: Re: Fw: Listserver for the Fri (80), 43994603>
Hit: Returning 4006e768 -> < N 38 Oct 10 Julio A moutinho (1,348) Re: Contents of file: 200.134.245.11 (80), 2629033>
STATUS: diff:-1, displayed: 971211706, now: 971211707
d_q_status_message(Command "Left Arrow" not defined for thi)
Clearing status line
STATUS cmd:2066, max:-1, min-1
cancel_busy_alarm(-1)
Read char returning: 2066 Down Arrow
Read command returning: 2066 Down Arrow
New_mail_count zeroed

- process_cmd((700)�) -
new mail called (0 2 1)
comatose(22) returns:"22"
Hit: Returning 4006e138 -> <+ N 20 Oct 10 #BIR:DIR (143K) FW: Agreement with Middlesex Univers (80), 189881479>
Hit: Returning 4006e190 -> <+ 21 Oct 10 Roberto Souto Pere (621) aditivo para fapesp (80), 20846348>
Hit: Returning 4006e1e8 -> < N 22 Oct 10 Reforme (4,355) V Cong.CLAD: Intervencion Panel 11 (80), 135627198>
Hit: Returning 4006e240 -> < N 23 Oct 10 Hernani Luiz Vila (2,464) Apresenta��o e d�vida (80), 231703483>
Hit: Returning 4006e298 -> <+ 24 Oct 10 Dora Pratt (2,152) noticias (80), 252630435>
Hit: Returning 4006e2f0 -> <+ N 25 Oct 10 Polo, Maria del Ro (3,994) Nuevo bebe!!! (80), 196105489>
Hit: Returning 4006e348 -> < N 26 Oct 10 Jana Bradley (5,231) Travel Award to ALA in San Francisco (80), 164004389>
Hit: Returning 4006e3a0 -> < N 27 Oct 10 Roberta Segreti (7,518) Fwd: ALA San Francisco Student Trave (80), 81677039>
Hit: Returning 4006e3f8 -> <+ N 28 Oct 10 Oliveira, Cristian (4,746) RE: Consultora Legislacao - Alimento (80), 21550823>
Hit: Returning 4006e450 -> <+ N 29 Oct 10 Ana Maria C. Arauj (1,695) Re: sugestao (80), 103860853>
Hit: Returning 4006e4a8 -> < N 30 Oct 10 Taruhn, Rosane (BI (3,738) [Gerentes-l] RE: [Gerentes-l] Re: su (80), 104713684>
Hit: Returning 4006e500 -> <+ N 31 Oct 10 Castro, Elenice de (2,050) mensagem do Pedro (80), 127876467>
Hit: Returning 4006e558 -> <+ N 32 Oct 10 Pedro Urra (8,003) Fwd: Returned mail: Can't create out (80), 224804631>
Hit: Returning 4006e5b0 -> <+ N 33 Oct 10 To: Abel L. Packer (860) Direccion de correo (fwd) (80), 197679491>
Hit: Returning 4006e608 -> < N 34 Oct 10 To: Ana Maria C. A (2,378) [Gerentes-l] Re: sugestao (80), 262852050>
Hit: Returning 4006e660 -> <+ N 35 Oct 10 #BIR:DIR (3,737) FW: Boletim Peri�dico Empresa - Ano (80), 83007618>
Hit: Returning 4006e6b8 -> < N 36 Oct 10 [email protected] (2,563) (no subject) (80), 243080280>
Hit: Returning 4006e710 -> <+ N 37 Oct 10 Marcia Ymanaka Bar (1,538) [Fwd: Re: Fw: Listserver for the Fri (80), 43994603>
Hit: Returning 4006e768 -> < N 38 Oct 10 Julio A moutinho (1,348) Re: Contents of file: 200.134.245.11 (80), 2629033>
STATUS cmd:2066, max:-1, min-1
cancel_busy_alarm(-1)
Read char returning: 2066 Down Arrow
Read command returning: 2066 Down Arrow
New_mail_count zeroed

- process_cmd((700)�) -
new mail called (0 2 1)
comatose(23) returns:"23"
Hit: Returning 4006e138 -> <+ N 20 Oct 10 #BIR:DIR (143K) FW: Agreement with Middlesex Univers (80), 189881479>
Hit: Returning 4006e190 -> <+ 21 Oct 10 Roberto Souto Pere (621) aditivo para fapesp (80), 20846348>
Hit: Returning 4006e1e8 -> < N 22 Oct 10 Reforme (4,355) V Cong.CLAD: Intervencion Panel 11 (80), 135627198>
Hit: Returning 4006e240 -> < N 23 Oct 10 Hernani Luiz Vila (2,464) Apresenta��o e d�vida (80), 231703483>
Hit: Returning 4006e298 -> <+ 24 Oct 10 Dora Pratt (2,152) noticias (80), 252630435>
Hit: Returning 4006e2f0 -> <+ N 25 Oct 10 Polo, Maria del Ro (3,994) Nuevo bebe!!! (80), 196105489>
Hit: Returning 4006e348 -> < N 26 Oct 10 Jana Bradley (5,231) Travel Award to ALA in San Francisco (80), 164004389>
Hit: Returning 4006e3a0 -> < N 27 Oct 10 Roberta Segreti (7,518) Fwd: ALA San Francisco Student Trave (80), 81677039>
Hit: Returning 4006e3f8 -> <+ N 28 Oct 10 Oliveira, Cristian (4,746) RE: Consultora Legislacao - Alimento (80), 21550823>
Hit: Returning 4006e450 -> <+ N 29 Oct 10 Ana Maria C. Arauj (1,695) Re: sugestao (80), 103860853>
Hit: Returning 4006e4a8 -> < N 30 Oct 10 Taruhn, Rosane (BI (3,738) [Gerentes-l] RE: [Gerentes-l] Re: su (80), 104713684>
Hit: Returning 4006e500 -> <+ N 31 Oct 10 Castro, Elenice de (2,050) mensagem do Pedro (80), 127876467>
Hit: Returning 4006e558 -> <+ N 32 Oct 10 Pedro Urra (8,003) Fwd: Returned mail: Can't create out (80), 224804631>
Hit: Returning 4006e5b0 -> <+ N 33 Oct 10 To: Abel L. Packer (860) Direccion de correo (fwd) (80), 197679491>
Hit: Returning 4006e608 -> < N 34 Oct 10 To: Ana Maria C. A (2,378) [Gerentes-l] Re: sugestao (80), 262852050>
Hit: Returning 4006e660 -> <+ N 35 Oct 10 #BIR:DIR (3,737) FW: Boletim Peri�dico Empresa - Ano (80), 83007618>
Hit: Returning 4006e6b8 -> < N 36 Oct 10 [email protected] (2,563) (no subject) (80), 243080280>
Hit: Returning 4006e710 -> <+ N 37 Oct 10 Marcia Ymanaka Bar (1,538) [Fwd: Re: Fw: Listserver for the Fri (80), 43994603>
Hit: Returning 4006e768 -> < N 38 Oct 10 Julio A moutinho (1,348) Re: Contents of file: 200.134.245.11 (80), 2629033>
STATUS cmd:2066, max:-1, min-1
cancel_busy_alarm(-1)
Read char returning: 2066 Down Arrow
Read command returning: 2066 Down Arrow
New_mail_count zeroed

- process_cmd((700)�) -
new mail called (0 2 1)
comatose(24) returns:"24"
Hit: Returning 4006e138 -> <+ N 20 Oct 10 #BIR:DIR (143K) FW: Agreement with Middlesex Univers (80), 189881479>
Hit: Returning 4006e190 -> <+ 21 Oct 10 Roberto Souto Pere (621) aditivo para fapesp (80), 20846348>
Hit: Returning 4006e1e8 -> < N 22 Oct 10 Reforme (4,355) V Cong.CLAD: Intervencion Panel 11 (80), 135627198>
Hit: Returning 4006e240 -> < N 23 Oct 10 Hernani Luiz Vila (2,464) Apresenta��o e d�vida (80), 231703483>
Hit: Returning 4006e298 -> <+ 24 Oct 10 Dora Pratt (2,152) noticias (80), 252630435>
Hit: Returning 4006e2f0 -> <+ N 25 Oct 10 Polo, Maria del Ro (3,994) Nuevo bebe!!! (80), 196105489>
Hit: Returning 4006e348 -> < N 26 Oct 10 Jana Bradley (5,231) Travel Award to ALA in San Francisco (80), 164004389>
Hit: Returning 4006e3a0 -> < N 27 Oct 10 Roberta Segreti (7,518) Fwd: ALA San Francisco Student Trave (80), 81677039>
Hit: Returning 4006e3f8 -> <+ N 28 Oct 10 Oliveira, Cristian (4,746) RE: Consultora Legislacao - Alimento (80), 21550823>
Hit: Returning 4006e450 -> <+ N 29 Oct 10 Ana Maria C. Arauj (1,695) Re: sugestao (80), 103860853>
Hit: Returning 4006e4a8 -> < N 30 Oct 10 Taruhn, Rosane (BI (3,738) [Gerentes-l] RE: [Gerentes-l] Re: su (80), 104713684>
Hit: Returning 4006e500 -> <+ N 31 Oct 10 Castro, Elenice de (2,050) mensagem do Pedro (80), 127876467>
Hit: Returning 4006e558 -> <+ N 32 Oct 10 Pedro Urra (8,003) Fwd: Returned mail: Can't create out (80), 224804631>
Hit: Returning 4006e5b0 -> <+ N 33 Oct 10 To: Abel L. Packer (860) Direccion de correo (fwd) (80), 197679491>
Hit: Returning 4006e608 -> < N 34 Oct 10 To: Ana Maria C. A (2,378) [Gerentes-l] Re: sugestao (80), 262852050>
Hit: Returning 4006e660 -> <+ N 35 Oct 10 #BIR:DIR (3,737) FW: Boletim Peri�dico Empresa - Ano (80), 83007618>
Hit: Returning 4006e6b8 -> < N 36 Oct 10 [email protected] (2,563) (no subject) (80), 243080280>
Hit: Returning 4006e710 -> <+ N 37 Oct 10 Marcia Ymanaka Bar (1,538) [Fwd: Re: Fw: Listserver for the Fri (80), 43994603>
Hit: Returning 4006e768 -> < N 38 Oct 10 Julio A moutinho (1,348) Re: Contents of file: 200.134.245.11 (80), 2629033>
STATUS cmd:2066, max:-1, min-1
cancel_busy_alarm(-1)
Read char returning: 2066 Down Arrow
Read command returning: 2066 Down Arrow
New_mail_count zeroed

- process_cmd((700)�) -
new mail called (0 2 1)
comatose(25) returns:"25"
Hit: Returning 4006e138 -> <+ N 20 Oct 10 #BIR:DIR (143K) FW: Agreement with Middlesex Univers (80), 189881479>
Hit: Returning 4006e190 -> <+ 21 Oct 10 Roberto Souto Pere (621) aditivo para fapesp (80), 20846348>
Hit: Returning 4006e1e8 -> < N 22 Oct 10 Reforme (4,355) V Cong.CLAD: Intervencion Panel 11 (80), 135627198>
Hit: Returning 4006e240 -> < N 23 Oct 10 Hernani Luiz Vila (2,464) Apresenta��o e d�vida (80), 231703483>
Hit: Returning 4006e298 -> <+ 24 Oct 10 Dora Pratt (2,152) noticias (80), 252630435>
Hit: Returning 4006e2f0 -> <+ N 25 Oct 10 Polo, Maria del Ro (3,994) Nuevo bebe!!! (80), 196105489>
Hit: Returning 4006e348 -> < N 26 Oct 10 Jana Bradley (5,231) Travel Award to ALA in San Francisco (80), 164004389>
Hit: Returning 4006e3a0 -> < N 27 Oct 10 Roberta Segreti (7,518) Fwd: ALA San Francisco Student Trave (80), 81677039>
Hit: Returning 4006e3f8 -> <+ N 28 Oct 10 Oliveira, Cristian (4,746) RE: Consultora Legislacao - Alimento (80), 21550823>
Hit: Returning 4006e450 -> <+ N 29 Oct 10 Ana Maria C. Arauj (1,695) Re: sugestao (80), 103860853>
Hit: Returning 4006e4a8 -> < N 30 Oct 10 Taruhn, Rosane (BI (3,738) [Gerentes-l] RE: [Gerentes-l] Re: su (80), 104713684>
Hit: Returning 4006e500 -> <+ N 31 Oct 10 Castro, Elenice de (2,050) mensagem do Pedro (80), 127876467>
Hit: Returning 4006e558 -> <+ N 32 Oct 10 Pedro Urra (8,003) Fwd: Returned mail: Can't create out (80), 224804631>
Hit: Returning 4006e5b0 -> <+ N 33 Oct 10 To: Abel L. Packer (860) Direccion de correo (fwd) (80), 197679491>
Hit: Returning 4006e608 -> < N 34 Oct 10 To: Ana Maria C. A (2,378) [Gerentes-l] Re: sugestao (80), 262852050>
Hit: Returning 4006e660 -> <+ N 35 Oct 10 #BIR:DIR (3,737) FW: Boletim Peri�dico Empresa - Ano (80), 83007618>
Hit: Returning 4006e6b8 -> < N 36 Oct 10 [email protected] (2,563) (no subject) (80), 243080280>
Hit: Returning 4006e710 -> <+ N 37 Oct 10 Marcia Ymanaka Bar (1,538) [Fwd: Re: Fw: Listserver for the Fri (80), 43994603>
Hit: Returning 4006e768 -> < N 38 Oct 10 Julio A moutinho (1,348) Re: Contents of file: 200.134.245.11 (80), 2629033>
STATUS cmd:2066, max:-1, min-1
cancel_busy_alarm(-1)
Read char returning: 13 RETURN
Read command returning: 13 RETURN
New_mail_count zeroed

- process_cmd((505)�) -

----- MAIL VIEW -----
busy_alarm(1, Busy, 00000000, 0)
-- gf_reset local_nvtnl
-- gf_reset wrap
-- gf_reset nvtnl_local
-- gf_pipe: suspend_busy_alarm
resume_busy_alarm
suspend_busy_alarm
resume_busy_alarm
suspend_busy_alarm
resume_busy_alarm
suspend_busy_alarm
resume_busy_alarm
suspend_busy_alarm
resume_busy_alarm
suspend_busy_alarm
resume_busy_alarm
suspend_busy_alarm
resume_busy_alarm
suspend_busy_alarm
resume_busy_alarm
suspend_busy_alarm
resume_busy_alarm
suspend_busy_alarm
resume_busy_alarm
suspend_busy_alarm
resume_busy_alarm
suspend_busy_alarm
resume_busy_alarm
suspend_busy_alarm
resume_busy_alarm
suspend_busy_alarm
resume_busy_alarm
suspend_busy_alarm
resume_busy_alarm
suspend_busy_alarm
resume_busy_alarm
suspend_busy_alarm
resume_busy_alarm
suspend_busy_alarm
resume_busy_alarm
suspend_busy_alarm
resume_busy_alarm
done.
comatose(7) returns:"7"
busy_alarm(1, Busy, 00000000, 0)
-- gf_reset escape
-- gf_reset wrap
-- gf_reset nvtnl_local
-- gf_pipe: done.
cancel_busy_alarm(-1)
@@@@ current:25
set_titlebar - style: 3 current message cnt:1 current_pl: 19 total_pl: 68
comatose(25) returns:"25"
comatose(1473) returns:"1,473"
0 ? Help 0
1 O OTHER CMDS 0
2 < MsgIndex 13
3 > ViewAttch 13
4 P PrevMsg 26
5 N NextMsg 26
6 - PrevPage 42
7 Spc NextPage 40
8 D Delete 53
9 U Undelete 53
10 R Reply 66
11 F Forward 66
row: -2, real_row: 22, column: 0
new mail called (0 0 1)
- adrbk_maintenance -
check_point(GoodTime)
freq 12 tm 420 changes 2 since_1st_change 0
since_status_chg 0 chk_cnt_ave 51 (tenths)
adj_chk_cnt_ave 51 (tenths)
Check:if changes(2)xadj_cca(51) >= freq(12)x200
is 102 >= 2400 ?
******** new mail returning -1 ********
Clearing status line
STATUS cmd:120, max:-1, min-1
cancel_busy_alarm(-1)
Read char returning: 105 i
Read command returning: 105 i
New_mail_count zeroed

- process_cmd((504)�) -
PROCESS_CMD return: 0
cancel_busy_alarm(-1)

---- MAIL INDEX ----

---- INDEX MANAGER ----
new mail called (0 2 1)
set_titlebar - style: 2 current message cnt:1 current_pl: 0 total_pl: 0
comatose(25) returns:"25"
comatose(1473) returns:"1,473"
=== setup_header_widths(1473) ===
Hit: Returning 4006e138 -> <+ N 20 Oct 10 #BIR:DIR (143K) FW: Agreement with Middlesex Univers (80), 189881479>
Hit: Returning 4006e190 -> <+ 21 Oct 10 Roberto Souto Pere (621) aditivo para fapesp (80), 20846348>
Hit: Returning 4006e1e8 -> < N 22 Oct 10 Reforme (4,355) V Cong.CLAD: Intervencion Panel 11 (80), 135627198>
Hit: Returning 4006e240 -> < N 23 Oct 10 Hernani Luiz Vila (2,464) Apresenta��o e d�vida (80), 231703483>
Hit: Returning 4006e298 -> <+ 24 Oct 10 Dora Pratt (2,152) noticias (80), 252630435>
=== format_index_line(25,1449) ===
Parse date: "Tue, 10 Oct 2000 09:43:24 -0600" to.. hours_off_gmt:-6 min_off_gmt:0
Parse date: wkday:2 month:10 year:2000 day:10 hour:9 min:43 sec:24
comatose(3994) returns:"3,994"
INDEX(4006e2f0) -->+ 25 Oct 10 Polo, Maria del Ro (3,994) Nuevo bebe!!! <-- (80), 196105443>
Hit: Returning 4006e348 -> < N 26 Oct 10 Jana Bradley (5,231) Travel Award to ALA in San Francisco (80), 164004389>
Hit: Returning 4006e3a0 -> < N 27 Oct 10 Roberta Segreti (7,518) Fwd: ALA San Francisco Student Trave (80), 81677039>
Hit: Returning 4006e3f8 -> <+ N 28 Oct 10 Oliveira, Cristian (4,746) RE: Consultora Legislacao - Alimento (80), 21550823>
Hit: Returning 4006e450 -> <+ N 29 Oct 10 Ana Maria C. Arauj (1,695) Re: sugestao (80), 103860853>
Hit: Returning 4006e4a8 -> < N 30 Oct 10 Taruhn, Rosane (BI (3,738) [Gerentes-l] RE: [Gerentes-l] Re: su (80), 104713684>
Hit: Returning 4006e500 -> <+ N 31 Oct 10 Castro, Elenice de (2,050) mensagem do Pedro (80), 127876467>
Hit: Returning 4006e558 -> <+ N 32 Oct 10 Pedro Urra (8,003) Fwd: Returned mail: Can't create out (80), 224804631>
Hit: Returning 4006e5b0 -> <+ N 33 Oct 10 To: Abel L. Packer (860) Direccion de correo (fwd) (80), 197679491>
Hit: Returning 4006e608 -> < N 34 Oct 10 To: Ana Maria C. A (2,378) [Gerentes-l] Re: sugestao (80), 262852050>
Hit: Returning 4006e660 -> <+ N 35 Oct 10 #BIR:DIR (3,737) FW: Boletim Peri�dico Empresa - Ano (80), 83007618>
Hit: Returning 4006e6b8 -> < N 36 Oct 10 [email protected] (2,563) (no subject) (80), 243080280>
Hit: Returning 4006e710 -> <+ N 37 Oct 10 Marcia Ymanaka Bar (1,538) [Fwd: Re: Fw: Listserver for the Fri (80), 43994603>
Hit: Returning 4006e768 -> < N 38 Oct 10 Julio A moutinho (1,348) Re: Contents of file: 200.134.245.11 (80), 2629033>
0 ? Help 0
1 O OTHER CMDS 0
2 < FldrList 13
3 > [ViewMsg] 13
4 P PrevMsg 26
5 N NextMsg 26
6 - PrevPage 42
7 Spc NextPage 40
8 D Delete 53
9 U Undelete 53
10 R Reply 66
11 F Forward 66
row: -2, real_row: 22, column: 0
STATUS cmd:120, max:-1, min-1
cancel_busy_alarm(-1)
Read char returning: 102 f
Read command returning: 102 f
New_mail_count zeroed

- process_cmd((706)�) -

- forward -
checking subject: "Nuevo bebe!!!"
open_patterns()
get_signature(/users/abel/.signature)
-- gf_reset local_nvtnl
-- gf_reset wrap
-- gf_reset nvtnl_local
-- gf_pipe: done.
busy_alarm(1, Busy, 00000000, 0)
busy_alarm(1, Busy, 00000000, 0)
-- gf_reset nvtnl_local
-- gf_pipe: done.
cancel_busy_alarm(-1)

=== send called ===
set_titlebar - style: 1 current message cnt:1 current_pl: 0 total_pl: 0
comatose(1473) returns:"1,473"
flags: 80000040
cancel_busy_alarm(-1)

---- COMPOSER ----
fix_windsize()
new win size -----<24 80>------
Clearing status line
STATUS cmd:24, max:-1, min-1
New_mail_count zeroed
new mail called (0 2 3)
.. composer returns (0x2)
fix_windsize()
new win size -----<24 80>------
init_signals()
busy_alarm(1, Busy, 00000000, 0)
busy_alarm(1, Busy, 00000000, 0)
busy_alarm(1, Busy, 00000000, 0)
-- pine_encode_body: 0
cancel_busy_alarm(-1)
pine_send:CANCEL handling
-- pine_rfc822_output
busy_alarm(1, Busy, 00000000, 0)
-- pine_encode_body: 0
-- pine_rfc822_output_body: 0
-- pine_rfc822_output_body: segment 3248 bytes
-- gf_reset local_nvtnl
-- gf_pipe: done.
cancel_busy_alarm(-1)
-- gf_reset nvtnl_local
-- gf_pipe: done.
q_status_message(Message cancelled and copied to "dead.le)
=== send returning ===
new mail called (0 2 1)
set_titlebar - style: 2 current message cnt:1 current_pl: 0 total_pl: 0
comatose(25) returns:"25"
comatose(1473) returns:"1,473"
Hit: Returning 4006e138 -> <+ N 20 Oct 10 #BIR:DIR (143K) FW: Agreement with Middlesex Univers (80), 189881479>
Hit: Returning 4006e190 -> <+ 21 Oct 10 Roberto Souto Pere (621) aditivo para fapesp (80), 20846348>
Hit: Returning 4006e1e8 -> < N 22 Oct 10 Reforme (4,355) V Cong.CLAD: Intervencion Panel 11 (80), 135627198>
Hit: Returning 4006e240 -> < N 23 Oct 10 Hernani Luiz Vila (2,464) Apresenta��o e d�vida (80), 231703483>
Hit: Returning 4006e298 -> <+ 24 Oct 10 Dora Pratt (2,152) noticias (80), 252630435>
Hit: Returning 4006e2f0 -> <+ 25 Oct 10 Polo, Maria del Ro (3,994) Nuevo bebe!!! (80), 196105443>
Hit: Returning 4006e348 -> < N 26 Oct 10 Jana Bradley (5,231) Travel Award to ALA in San Francisco (80), 164004389>
Hit: Returning 4006e3a0 -> < N 27 Oct 10 Roberta Segreti (7,518) Fwd: ALA San Francisco Student Trave (80), 81677039>
Hit: Returning 4006e3f8 -> <+ N 28 Oct 10 Oliveira, Cristian (4,746) RE: Consultora Legislacao - Alimento (80), 21550823>
Hit: Returning 4006e450 -> <+ N 29 Oct 10 Ana Maria C. Arauj (1,695) Re: sugestao (80), 103860853>
Hit: Returning 4006e4a8 -> < N 30 Oct 10 Taruhn, Rosane (BI (3,738) [Gerentes-l] RE: [Gerentes-l] Re: su (80), 104713684>
Hit: Returning 4006e500 -> <+ N 31 Oct 10 Castro, Elenice de (2,050) mensagem do Pedro (80), 127876467>
Hit: Returning 4006e558 -> <+ N 32 Oct 10 Pedro Urra (8,003) Fwd: Returned mail: Can't create out (80), 224804631>
Hit: Returning 4006e5b0 -> <+ N 33 Oct 10 To: Abel L. Packer (860) Direccion de correo (fwd) (80), 197679491>
Hit: Returning 4006e608 -> < N 34 Oct 10 To: Ana Maria C. A (2,378) [Gerentes-l] Re: sugestao (80), 262852050>
Hit: Returning 4006e660 -> <+ N 35 Oct 10 #BIR:DIR (3,737) FW: Boletim Peri�dico Empresa - Ano (80), 83007618>
Hit: Returning 4006e6b8 -> < N 36 Oct 10 [email protected] (2,563) (no subject) (80), 243080280>
Hit: Returning 4006e710 -> <+ N 37 Oct 10 Marcia Ymanaka Bar (1,538) [Fwd: Re: Fw: Listserver for the Fri (80), 43994603>
Hit: Returning 4006e768 -> < N 38 Oct 10 Julio A moutinho (1,348) Re: Contents of file: 200.134.245.11 (80), 2629033>
0 ? Help 0
1 O OTHER CMDS 0
2 < FldrList 13
3 > [ViewMsg] 13
4 P PrevMsg 26
5 N NextMsg 26
6 - PrevPage 42
7 Spc NextPage 40
8 D Delete 53
9 U Undelete 53
10 R Reply 66
11 F Forward 66
row: -2, real_row: 22, column: 0
output_message(Message cancelled and copied to "dead.letter" file)
STATUS cmd:102, max:3, min0
cancel_busy_alarm(-1)
Read char returning: 100 d
Read command returning: 100 d
New_mail_count zeroed

- process_cmd((702)�) -

- delete message -
DELETE: msg 1449
q_status_message(Message 25 marked for deletion)
new mail called (0 2 1)
set_titlebar - style: 2 current message cnt:1 current_pl: 0 total_pl: 0
comatose(26) returns:"26"
comatose(1473) returns:"1,473"
Hit: Returning 4006e138 -> <+ N 20 Oct 10 #BIR:DIR (143K) FW: Agreement with Middlesex Univers (80), 189881479>
Hit: Returning 4006e190 -> <+ 21 Oct 10 Roberto Souto Pere (621) aditivo para fapesp (80), 20846348>
Hit: Returning 4006e1e8 -> < N 22 Oct 10 Reforme (4,355) V Cong.CLAD: Intervencion Panel 11 (80), 135627198>
Hit: Returning 4006e240 -> < N 23 Oct 10 Hernani Luiz Vila (2,464) Apresenta��o e d�vida (80), 231703483>
Hit: Returning 4006e298 -> <+ 24 Oct 10 Dora Pratt (2,152) noticias (80), 252630435>
=== format_index_line(25,1449) ===
Parse date: "Tue, 10 Oct 2000 09:43:24 -0600" to.. hours_off_gmt:-6 min_off_gmt:0
Parse date: wkday:2 month:10 year:2000 day:10 hour:9 min:43 sec:24
comatose(3994) returns:"3,994"
INDEX(4006e2f0) -->+ D 25 Oct 10 Polo, Maria del Ro (3,994) Nuevo bebe!!! <-- (80), 196105479>
Hit: Returning 4006e348 -> < N 26 Oct 10 Jana Bradley (5,231) Travel Award to ALA in San Francisco (80), 164004389>
Hit: Returning 4006e3a0 -> < N 27 Oct 10 Roberta Segreti (7,518) Fwd: ALA San Francisco Student Trave (80), 81677039>
Hit: Returning 4006e3f8 -> <+ N 28 Oct 10 Oliveira, Cristian (4,746) RE: Consultora Legislacao - Alimento (80), 21550823>
Hit: Returning 4006e450 -> <+ N 29 Oct 10 Ana Maria C. Arauj (1,695) Re: sugestao (80), 103860853>
Hit: Returning 4006e4a8 -> < N 30 Oct 10 Taruhn, Rosane (BI (3,738) [Gerentes-l] RE: [Gerentes-l] Re: su (80), 104713684>
Hit: Returning 4006e500 -> <+ N 31 Oct 10 Castro, Elenice de (2,050) mensagem do Pedro (80), 127876467>
Hit: Returning 4006e558 -> <+ N 32 Oct 10 Pedro Urra (8,003) Fwd: Returned mail: Can't create out (80), 224804631>
Hit: Returning 4006e5b0 -> <+ N 33 Oct 10 To: Abel L. Packer (860) Direccion de correo (fwd) (80), 197679491>
Hit: Returning 4006e608 -> < N 34 Oct 10 To: Ana Maria C. A (2,378) [Gerentes-l] Re: sugestao (80), 262852050>
Hit: Returning 4006e660 -> <+ N 35 Oct 10 #BIR:DIR (3,737) FW: Boletim Peri�dico Empresa - Ano (80), 83007618>
Hit: Returning 4006e6b8 -> < N 36 Oct 10 [email protected] (2,563) (no subject) (80), 243080280>
Hit: Returning 4006e710 -> <+ N 37 Oct 10 Marcia Ymanaka Bar (1,538) [Fwd: Re: Fw: Listserver for the Fri (80), 43994603>
Hit: Returning 4006e768 -> < N 38 Oct 10 Julio A moutinho (1,348) Re: Contents of file: 200.134.245.11 (80), 2629033>
STATUS: diff:-1, displayed: 971211714, now: 971211715
d_q_status_message(Message cancelled and copied to "dead.le)
output_message(Message 25 marked for deletion)
STATUS cmd:100, max:3, min0
cancel_busy_alarm(-1)
Read char returning: 100 d
Read command returning: 100 d
New_mail_count zeroed

- process_cmd((702)�) -

- delete message -
DELETE: msg 1448
q_status_message(Message 26 marked for deletion)
new mail called (0 2 1)
set_titlebar - style: 2 current message cnt:1 current_pl: 0 total_pl: 0
comatose(27) returns:"27"
comatose(1473) returns:"1,473"
Hit: Returning 4006e138 -> <+ N 20 Oct 10 #BIR:DIR (143K) FW: Agreement with Middlesex Univers (80), 189881479>
Hit: Returning 4006e190 -> <+ 21 Oct 10 Roberto Souto Pere (621) aditivo para fapesp (80), 20846348>
Hit: Returning 4006e1e8 -> < N 22 Oct 10 Reforme (4,355) V Cong.CLAD: Intervencion Panel 11 (80), 135627198>
Hit: Returning 4006e240 -> < N 23 Oct 10 Hernani Luiz Vila (2,464) Apresenta��o e d�vida (80), 231703483>
Hit: Returning 4006e298 -> <+ 24 Oct 10 Dora Pratt (2,152) noticias (80), 252630435>
Hit: Returning 4006e2f0 -> <+ D 25 Oct 10 Polo, Maria del Ro (3,994) Nuevo bebe!!! (80), 196105479>
=== format_index_line(26,1448) ===
Parse date: "Tue, 10 Oct 2000 11:32:02 -0400" to.. hours_off_gmt:-4 min_off_gmt:0
Parse date: wkday:2 month:10 year:2000 day:10 hour:11 min:32 sec:2
comatose(5231) returns:"5,231"
INDEX(4006e348) --> D 26 Oct 10 Jana Bradley (5,231) Travel Award to ALA in San Francisco<-- (80), 164004379>
Hit: Returning 4006e3a0 -> < N 27 Oct 10 Roberta Segreti (7,518) Fwd: ALA San Francisco Student Trave (80), 81677039>
Hit: Returning 4006e3f8 -> <+ N 28 Oct 10 Oliveira, Cristian (4,746) RE: Consultora Legislacao - Alimento (80), 21550823>
Hit: Returning 4006e450 -> <+ N 29 Oct 10 Ana Maria C. Arauj (1,695) Re: sugestao (80), 103860853>
Hit: Returning 4006e4a8 -> < N 30 Oct 10 Taruhn, Rosane (BI (3,738) [Gerentes-l] RE: [Gerentes-l] Re: su (80), 104713684>
Hit: Returning 4006e500 -> <+ N 31 Oct 10 Castro, Elenice de (2,050) mensagem do Pedro (80), 127876467>
Hit: Returning 4006e558 -> <+ N 32 Oct 10 Pedro Urra (8,003) Fwd: Returned mail: Can't create out (80), 224804631>
Hit: Returning 4006e5b0 -> <+ N 33 Oct 10 To: Abel L. Packer (860) Direccion de correo (fwd) (80), 197679491>
Hit: Returning 4006e608 -> < N 34 Oct 10 To: Ana Maria C. A (2,378) [Gerentes-l] Re: sugestao (80), 262852050>
Hit: Returning 4006e660 -> <+ N 35 Oct 10 #BIR:DIR (3,737) FW: Boletim Peri�dico Empresa - Ano (80), 83007618>
Hit: Returning 4006e6b8 -> < N 36 Oct 10 [email protected] (2,563) (no subject) (80), 243080280>
Hit: Returning 4006e710 -> <+ N 37 Oct 10 Marcia Ymanaka Bar (1,538) [Fwd: Re: Fw: Listserver for the Fri (80), 43994603>
Hit: Returning 4006e768 -> < N 38 Oct 10 Julio A moutinho (1,348) Re: Contents of file: 200.134.245.11 (80), 2629033>
STATUS: diff:-3, displayed: 971211715, now: 971211718
d_q_status_message(Message 25 marked for deletion)
output_message(Message 26 marked for deletion)
STATUS cmd:100, max:3, min0
cancel_busy_alarm(-1)
Read char returning: 100 d
Read command returning: 100 d
New_mail_count zeroed

- process_cmd((702)�) -

- delete message -
DELETE: msg 1447
q_status_message(Message 27 marked for deletion)
new mail called (0 2 1)
set_titlebar - style: 2 current message cnt:1 current_pl: 0 total_pl: 0
comatose(28) returns:"28"
comatose(1473) returns:"1,473"
Hit: Returning 4006e138 -> <+ N 20 Oct 10 #BIR:DIR (143K) FW: Agreement with Middlesex Univers (80), 189881479>
Hit: Returning 4006e190 -> <+ 21 Oct 10 Roberto Souto Pere (621) aditivo para fapesp (80), 20846348>
Hit: Returning 4006e1e8 -> < N 22 Oct 10 Reforme (4,355) V Cong.CLAD: Intervencion Panel 11 (80), 135627198>
Hit: Returning 4006e240 -> < N 23 Oct 10 Hernani Luiz Vila (2,464) Apresenta��o e d�vida (80), 231703483>
Hit: Returning 4006e298 -> <+ 24 Oct 10 Dora Pratt (2,152) noticias (80), 252630435>
Hit: Returning 4006e2f0 -> <+ D 25 Oct 10 Polo, Maria del Ro (3,994) Nuevo bebe!!! (80), 196105479>
Hit: Returning 4006e348 -> < D 26 Oct 10 Jana Bradley (5,231) Travel Award to ALA in San Francisco (80), 164004379>
=== format_index_line(27,1447) ===
Parse date: "Tue, 10 Oct 2000 11:16:46 -0400" to.. hours_off_gmt:-4 min_off_gmt:0
Parse date: wkday:2 month:10 year:2000 day:10 hour:11 min:16 sec:46
comatose(7518) returns:"7,518"
INDEX(4006e3a0) --> D 27 Oct 10 Roberta Segreti (7,518) Fwd: ALA San Francisco Student Trave<-- (80), 81677029>
Hit: Returning 4006e3f8 -> <+ N 28 Oct 10 Oliveira, Cristian (4,746) RE: Consultora Legislacao - Alimento (80), 21550823>
Hit: Returning 4006e450 -> <+ N 29 Oct 10 Ana Maria C. Arauj (1,695) Re: sugestao (80), 103860853>
Hit: Returning 4006e4a8 -> < N 30 Oct 10 Taruhn, Rosane (BI (3,738) [Gerentes-l] RE: [Gerentes-l] Re: su (80), 104713684>
Hit: Returning 4006e500 -> <+ N 31 Oct 10 Castro, Elenice de (2,050) mensagem do Pedro (80), 127876467>
Hit: Returning 4006e558 -> <+ N 32 Oct 10 Pedro Urra (8,003) Fwd: Returned mail: Can't create out (80), 224804631>
Hit: Returning 4006e5b0 -> <+ N 33 Oct 10 To: Abel L. Packer (860) Direccion de correo (fwd) (80), 197679491>
Hit: Returning 4006e608 -> < N 34 Oct 10 To: Ana Maria C. A (2,378) [Gerentes-l] Re: sugestao (80), 262852050>
Hit: Returning 4006e660 -> <+ N 35 Oct 10 #BIR:DIR (3,737) FW: Boletim Peri�dico Empresa - Ano (80), 83007618>
Hit: Returning 4006e6b8 -> < N 36 Oct 10 [email protected] (2,563) (no subject) (80), 243080280>
Hit: Returning 4006e710 -> <+ N 37 Oct 10 Marcia Ymanaka Bar (1,538) [Fwd: Re: Fw: Listserver for the Fri (80), 43994603>
Hit: Returning 4006e768 -> < N 38 Oct 10 Julio A moutinho (1,348) Re: Contents of file: 200.134.245.11 (80), 2629033>
STATUS: diff:-2, displayed: 971211718, now: 971211720
d_q_status_message(Message 26 marked for deletion)
output_message(Message 27 marked for deletion)
STATUS cmd:100, max:3, min0
cancel_busy_alarm(-1)
Read char returning: 13 RETURN
Read command returning: 13 RETURN
New_mail_count zeroed

- process_cmd((505)�) -

----- MAIL VIEW -----
busy_alarm(1, Busy, 00000000, 0)
-- gf_reset local_nvtnl
-- gf_reset wrap
-- gf_reset nvtnl_local
-- gf_pipe: suspend_busy_alarm
resume_busy_alarm
suspend_busy_alarm
resume_busy_alarm
suspend_busy_alarm
resume_busy_alarm
suspend_busy_alarm
resume_busy_alarm
suspend_busy_alarm
resume_busy_alarm
done.
comatose(108) returns:"108"
suspend_busy_alarm
resume_busy_alarm
busy_alarm(1, Busy, 00000000, 0)
-- gf_reset escape
-- gf_reset wrap
-- gf_reset nvtnl_local
-- gf_pipe: suspend_busy_alarm
resume_busy_alarm
suspend_busy_alarm
resume_busy_alarm
suspend_busy_alarm
resume_busy_alarm
suspend_busy_alarm
resume_busy_alarm
suspend_busy_alarm
resume_busy_alarm
suspend_busy_alarm
resume_busy_alarm
suspend_busy_alarm
resume_busy_alarm
suspend_busy_alarm
resume_busy_alarm
suspend_busy_alarm
resume_busy_alarm
suspend_busy_alarm
resume_busy_alarm
suspend_busy_alarm
resume_busy_alarm
suspend_busy_alarm
resume_busy_alarm
suspend_busy_alarm
resume_busy_alarm
done.
cancel_busy_alarm(-1)
@@@@ current:28
set_titlebar - style: 3 current message cnt:1 current_pl: 19 total_pl: 114
comatose(28) returns:"28"
comatose(1473) returns:"1,473"
0 ? Help 0
1 O OTHER CMDS 0
2 < MsgIndex 13
3 > ViewAttch 13
4 P PrevMsg 26
5 N NextMsg 26
6 - PrevPage 42
7 Spc NextPage 40
8 D Delete 53
9 U Undelete 53
10 R Reply 66
11 F Forward 66
row: -2, real_row: 22, column: 0
new mail called (0 0 1)
- adrbk_maintenance -
check_point(GoodTime)
freq 12 tm 420 changes 7 since_1st_change 11
since_status_chg 0 chk_cnt_ave 11 (tenths)
adj_chk_cnt_ave 11 (tenths)
Check:if changes(7)xadj_cca(11) >= freq(12)x200
is 77 >= 2400 ?
******** new mail returning -1 ********
STATUS: diff:-1, displayed: 971211720, now: 971211721
d_q_status_message(Message 27 marked for deletion)
Clearing status line
STATUS cmd:120, max:-1, min-1
cancel_busy_alarm(-1)
Read char returning: 2066 Down Arrow
Read command returning: 2066 Down Arrow
New_mail_count zeroed
@@@@ current:28
new mail called (0 2 1)
STATUS cmd:2066, max:-1, min-1
cancel_busy_alarm(-1)
Read char returning: 2066 Down Arrow
Read command returning: 2066 Down Arrow
New_mail_count zeroed
@@@@ current:28
new mail called (0 2 1)
STATUS cmd:2066, max:-1, min-1
cancel_busy_alarm(-1)
Read char returning: 2066 Down Arrow
Read command returning: 2066 Down Arrow
New_mail_count zeroed
@@@@ current:28
new mail called (0 2 1)
STATUS cmd:2066, max:-1, min-1
cancel_busy_alarm(-1)
Read char returning: 2066 Down Arrow
Read command returning: 2066 Down Arrow
New_mail_count zeroed
@@@@ current:28
new mail called (0 2 1)
STATUS cmd:2066, max:-1, min-1
cancel_busy_alarm(-1)
Read char returning: 2066 Down Arrow
Read command returning: 2066 Down Arrow
New_mail_count zeroed
@@@@ current:28
new mail called (0 2 1)
STATUS cmd:2066, max:-1, min-1
cancel_busy_alarm(-1)
Read char returning: 2066 Down Arrow
Read command returning: 2066 Down Arrow
New_mail_count zeroed
@@@@ current:28
new mail called (0 2 1)
STATUS cmd:2066, max:-1, min-1
cancel_busy_alarm(-1)
Read char returning: 2066 Down Arrow
Read command returning: 2066 Down Arrow
New_mail_count zeroed
@@@@ current:28
new mail called (0 2 1)
check_point(VeryBadTime)
freq 48 tm 1260 changes 7 since_1st_change 27
since_status_chg 160 chk_cnt_ave 11 (tenths)
adj_chk_cnt_ave 85 (tenths)
Check:if changes(7)xadj_cca(85) >= freq(48)x200
is 595 >= 9600 ?
******** new mail returning -1 ********
STATUS cmd:2066, max:-1, min-1
cancel_busy_alarm(-1)
Read char returning: 2066 Down Arrow
Read command returning: 2066 Down Arrow
New_mail_count zeroed
@@@@ current:28
new mail called (0 2 1)
STATUS cmd:2066, max:-1, min-1
cancel_busy_alarm(-1)
Read char returning: 2066 Down Arrow
Read command returning: 2066 Down Arrow
New_mail_count zeroed
@@@@ current:28
new mail called (0 2 1)
STATUS cmd:2066, max:-1, min-1
cancel_busy_alarm(-1)
Read char returning: 2066 Down Arrow
Read command returning: 2066 Down Arrow
New_mail_count zeroed
@@@@ current:28
new mail called (0 2 1)
STATUS cmd:2066, max:-1, min-1
cancel_busy_alarm(-1)
Read char returning: 2066 Down Arrow
Read command returning: 2066 Down Arrow
New_mail_count zeroed
@@@@ current:28
new mail called (0 2 1)
STATUS cmd:2066, max:-1, min-1
cancel_busy_alarm(-1)
Read char returning: 2066 Down Arrow
Read command returning: 2066 Down Arrow
New_mail_count zeroed
@@@@ current:28
new mail called (0 2 1)
STATUS cmd:2066, max:-1, min-1
cancel_busy_alarm(-1)
Read char returning: 2066 Down Arrow
Read command returning: 2066 Down Arrow
New_mail_count zeroed
@@@@ current:28
new mail called (0 2 1)
STATUS cmd:2066, max:-1, min-1
cancel_busy_alarm(-1)
Read char returning: 105 i
Read command returning: 105 i
New_mail_count zeroed

- process_cmd((504)�) -
PROCESS_CMD return: 0
cancel_busy_alarm(-1)

---- MAIL INDEX ----

---- INDEX MANAGER ----
new mail called (0 2 1)
set_titlebar - style: 2 current message cnt:1 current_pl: 0 total_pl: 0
comatose(28) returns:"28"
comatose(1473) returns:"1,473"
=== setup_header_widths(1473) ===
Hit: Returning 4006e138 -> <+ N 20 Oct 10 #BIR:DIR (143K) FW: Agreement with Middlesex Univers (80), 189881479>
Hit: Returning 4006e190 -> <+ 21 Oct 10 Roberto Souto Pere (621) aditivo para fapesp (80), 20846348>
Hit: Returning 4006e1e8 -> < N 22 Oct 10 Reforme (4,355) V Cong.CLAD: Intervencion Panel 11 (80), 135627198>
Hit: Returning 4006e240 -> < N 23 Oct 10 Hernani Luiz Vila (2,464) Apresenta��o e d�vida (80), 231703483>
Hit: Returning 4006e298 -> <+ 24 Oct 10 Dora Pratt (2,152) noticias (80), 252630435>
Hit: Returning 4006e2f0 -> <+ D 25 Oct 10 Polo, Maria del Ro (3,994) Nuevo bebe!!! (80), 196105479>
Hit: Returning 4006e348 -> < D 26 Oct 10 Jana Bradley (5,231) Travel Award to ALA in San Francisco (80), 164004379>
Hit: Returning 4006e3a0 -> < D 27 Oct 10 Roberta Segreti (7,518) Fwd: ALA San Francisco Student Trave (80), 81677029>
=== format_index_line(28,1446) ===
Parse date: "Tue, 10 Oct 2000 12:07:35 -0300" to.. hours_off_gmt:-3 min_off_gmt:0
Parse date: wkday:2 month:10 year:2000 day:10 hour:12 min:7 sec:35
comatose(4746) returns:"4,746"
INDEX(4006e3f8) -->+ 28 Oct 10 Oliveira, Cristian (4,746) RE: Consultora Legislacao - Alimento<-- (80), 21550777>
Hit: Returning 4006e450 -> <+ N 29 Oct 10 Ana Maria C. Arauj (1,695) Re: sugestao (80), 103860853>
Hit: Returning 4006e4a8 -> < N 30 Oct 10 Taruhn, Rosane (BI (3,738) [Gerentes-l] RE: [Gerentes-l] Re: su (80), 104713684>
Hit: Returning 4006e500 -> <+ N 31 Oct 10 Castro, Elenice de (2,050) mensagem do Pedro (80), 127876467>
Hit: Returning 4006e558 -> <+ N 32 Oct 10 Pedro Urra (8,003) Fwd: Returned mail: Can't create out (80), 224804631>
Hit: Returning 4006e5b0 -> <+ N 33 Oct 10 To: Abel L. Packer (860) Direccion de correo (fwd) (80), 197679491>
Hit: Returning 4006e608 -> < N 34 Oct 10 To: Ana Maria C. A (2,378) [Gerentes-l] Re: sugestao (80), 262852050>
Hit: Returning 4006e660 -> <+ N 35 Oct 10 #BIR:DIR (3,737) FW: Boletim Peri�dico Empresa - Ano (80), 83007618>
Hit: Returning 4006e6b8 -> < N 36 Oct 10 [email protected] (2,563) (no subject) (80), 243080280>
Hit: Returning 4006e710 -> <+ N 37 Oct 10 Marcia Ymanaka Bar (1,538) [Fwd: Re: Fw: Listserver for the Fri (80), 43994603>
Hit: Returning 4006e768 -> < N 38 Oct 10 Julio A moutinho (1,348) Re: Contents of file: 200.134.245.11 (80), 2629033>
0 ? Help 0
1 O OTHER CMDS 0
2 < FldrList 13
3 > [ViewMsg] 13
4 P PrevMsg 26
5 N NextMsg 26
6 - PrevPage 42
7 Spc NextPage 40
8 D Delete 53
9 U Undelete 53
10 R Reply 66
11 F Forward 66
row: -2, real_row: 22, column: 0
STATUS cmd:120, max:-1, min-1
cancel_busy_alarm(-1)
Read char returning: 115 s
Read command returning: 115 s
New_mail_count zeroed

- process_cmd((714)�) -

- saving message -
=== optionally_enter called ===
string:"" y:0 x:-3 length: 1024 append: 1
passwd:0 prompt:"SAVE Msg #28 to folder [saved-Oct-98] : " label:"To Fldrs"
suspend_busy_alarm
0 ^G Help 0
1 ^C Cancel 0
2 ^T To Fldrs 14
3 Ret Accept 13
4 (null) (null) 26
5 (null) (null) 26
6 (null) (null) 40
7 (null) (null) 40
8 (null) (null) 53
9 (null) (null) 53
10 (null) (null) 66
11 (null) (null) 66
row: -2, real_row: 22, column: 0
Read char returning: 108 l
Read char returning: 101 e
Read char returning: 103 g
Read char returning: 105 i
Read char returning: 115 s
Read char returning: 108 l
Read char returning: 97 a
Read char returning: 99 c
Read char returning: 97 a
Read char returning: 111 o
Read char returning: 13 RETURN
resume_busy_alarm
same_stream: mail/legislacao == /var/mail/abel
same_stream: no dice
busy_alarm(1, Busy, 00000000, 0)
mm_list "mail/legislacao": delim: '/', , no inferiors, marked
cancel_busy_alarm(-1)
busy_alarm(1, Busy, 00000000, 0)
same_stream: mail/legislacao == /var/mail/abel
same_stream: no dice
same_stream: mail/legislacao == /var/mail/abel
same_stream: no dice
Done with IMAP critical on
Done with IMAP critical on
cancel_busy_alarm(0)
q_status_message(Message 28 copied to folder "legislacao")
new mail called (0 2 1)
set_titlebar - style: 2 current message cnt:1 current_pl: 0 total_pl: 0
comatose(28) returns:"28"
comatose(1473) returns:"1,473"
Hit: Returning 4006e138 -> <+ N 20 Oct 10 #BIR:DIR (143K) FW: Agreement with Middlesex Univers (80), 189881479>
Hit: Returning 4006e190 -> <+ 21 Oct 10 Roberto Souto Pere (621) aditivo para fapesp (80), 20846348>
Hit: Returning 4006e1e8 -> < N 22 Oct 10 Reforme (4,355) V Cong.CLAD: Intervencion Panel 11 (80), 135627198>
Hit: Returning 4006e240 -> < N 23 Oct 10 Hernani Luiz Vila (2,464) Apresenta��o e d�vida (80), 231703483>
Hit: Returning 4006e298 -> <+ 24 Oct 10 Dora Pratt (2,152) noticias (80), 252630435>
Hit: Returning 4006e2f0 -> <+ D 25 Oct 10 Polo, Maria del Ro (3,994) Nuevo bebe!!! (80), 196105479>
Hit: Returning 4006e348 -> < D 26 Oct 10 Jana Bradley (5,231) Travel Award to ALA in San Francisco (80), 164004379>
Hit: Returning 4006e3a0 -> < D 27 Oct 10 Roberta Segreti (7,518) Fwd: ALA San Francisco Student Trave (80), 81677029>
=== format_index_line(28,1446) ===
Parse date: "Tue, 10 Oct 2000 12:07:35 -0300" to.. hours_off_gmt:-3 min_off_gmt:0
Parse date: wkday:2 month:10 year:2000 day:10 hour:12 min:7 sec:35
comatose(4746) returns:"4,746"
INDEX(4006e3f8) -->+ D 28 Oct 10 Oliveira, Cristian (4,746) RE: Consultora Legislacao - Alimento<-- (80), 21550813>
Hit: Returning 4006e450 -> <+ N 29 Oct 10 Ana Maria C. Arauj (1,695) Re: sugestao (80), 103860853>
Hit: Returning 4006e4a8 -> < N 30 Oct 10 Taruhn, Rosane (BI (3,738) [Gerentes-l] RE: [Gerentes-l] Re: su (80), 104713684>
Hit: Returning 4006e500 -> <+ N 31 Oct 10 Castro, Elenice de (2,050) mensagem do Pedro (80), 127876467>
Hit: Returning 4006e558 -> <+ N 32 Oct 10 Pedro Urra (8,003) Fwd: Returned mail: Can't create out (80), 224804631>
Hit: Returning 4006e5b0 -> <+ N 33 Oct 10 To: Abel L. Packer (860) Direccion de correo (fwd) (80), 197679491>
Hit: Returning 4006e608 -> < N 34 Oct 10 To: Ana Maria C. A (2,378) [Gerentes-l] Re: sugestao (80), 262852050>
Hit: Returning 4006e660 -> <+ N 35 Oct 10 #BIR:DIR (3,737) FW: Boletim Peri�dico Empresa - Ano (80), 83007618>
Hit: Returning 4006e6b8 -> < N 36 Oct 10 [email protected] (2,563) (no subject) (80), 243080280>
Hit: Returning 4006e710 -> <+ N 37 Oct 10 Marcia Ymanaka Bar (1,538) [Fwd: Re: Fw: Listserver for the Fri (80), 43994603>
Hit: Returning 4006e768 -> < N 38 Oct 10 Julio A moutinho (1,348) Re: Contents of file: 200.134.245.11 (80), 2629033>
0 ? Help 0
1 O OTHER CMDS 0
2 < FldrList 13
3 > [ViewMsg] 13
4 P PrevMsg 26
5 N NextMsg 26
6 - PrevPage 42
7 Spc NextPage 40
8 D Delete 53
9 U Undelete 53
10 R Reply 66
11 F Forward 66
row: -2, real_row: 22, column: 0
output_message(Message 28 copied to folder "legislacao" and deleted)
STATUS cmd:115, max:3, min0
cancel_busy_alarm(-1)
Read char returning: 2066 Down Arrow
Read command returning: 2066 Down Arrow
New_mail_count zeroed

- process_cmd((700)�) -
new mail called (0 2 1)
comatose(29) returns:"29"
Hit: Returning 4006e138 -> <+ N 20 Oct 10 #BIR:DIR (143K) FW: Agreement with Middlesex Univers (80), 189881479>
Hit: Returning 4006e190 -> <+ 21 Oct 10 Roberto Souto Pere (621) aditivo para fapesp (80), 20846348>
Hit: Returning 4006e1e8 -> < N 22 Oct 10 Reforme (4,355) V Cong.CLAD: Intervencion Panel 11 (80), 135627198>
Hit: Returning 4006e240 -> < N 23 Oct 10 Hernani Luiz Vila (2,464) Apresenta��o e d�vida (80), 231703483>
Hit: Returning 4006e298 -> <+ 24 Oct 10 Dora Pratt (2,152) noticias (80), 252630435>
Hit: Returning 4006e2f0 -> <+ D 25 Oct 10 Polo, Maria del Ro (3,994) Nuevo bebe!!! (80), 196105479>
Hit: Returning 4006e348 -> < D 26 Oct 10 Jana Bradley (5,231) Travel Award to ALA in San Francisco (80), 164004379>
Hit: Returning 4006e3a0 -> < D 27 Oct 10 Roberta Segreti (7,518) Fwd: ALA San Francisco Student Trave (80), 81677029>
Hit: Returning 4006e3f8 -> <+ D 28 Oct 10 Oliveira, Cristian (4,746) RE: Consultora Legislacao - Alimento (80), 21550813>
Hit: Returning 4006e450 -> <+ N 29 Oct 10 Ana Maria C. Arauj (1,695) Re: sugestao (80), 103860853>
Hit: Returning 4006e4a8 -> < N 30 Oct 10 Taruhn, Rosane (BI (3,738) [Gerentes-l] RE: [Gerentes-l] Re: su (80), 104713684>
Hit: Returning 4006e500 -> <+ N 31 Oct 10 Castro, Elenice de (2,050) mensagem do Pedro (80), 127876467>
Hit: Returning 4006e558 -> <+ N 32 Oct 10 Pedro Urra (8,003) Fwd: Returned mail: Can't create out (80), 224804631>
Hit: Returning 4006e5b0 -> <+ N 33 Oct 10 To: Abel L. Packer (860) Direccion de correo (fwd) (80), 197679491>
Hit: Returning 4006e608 -> < N 34 Oct 10 To: Ana Maria C. A (2,378) [Gerentes-l] Re: sugestao (80), 262852050>
Hit: Returning 4006e660 -> <+ N 35 Oct 10 #BIR:DIR (3,737) FW: Boletim Peri�dico Empresa - Ano (80), 83007618>
Hit: Returning 4006e6b8 -> < N 36 Oct 10 [email protected] (2,563) (no subject) (80), 243080280>
Hit: Returning 4006e710 -> <+ N 37 Oct 10 Marcia Ymanaka Bar (1,538) [Fwd: Re: Fw: Listserver for the Fri (80), 43994603>
Hit: Returning 4006e768 -> < N 38 Oct 10 Julio A moutinho (1,348) Re: Contents of file: 200.134.245.11 (80), 2629033>
STATUS: diff:0, displayed: 971211750, now: 971211750
d_q_status_message(Message 28 copied to folder "legislacao")
Clearing status line
STATUS cmd:2066, max:-1, min-1
cancel_busy_alarm(-1)
Read char returning: 13 RETURN
Read command returning: 13 RETURN
New_mail_count zeroed

- process_cmd((505)�) -

----- MAIL VIEW -----
busy_alarm(1, Busy, 00000000, 0)
-- gf_reset local_nvtnl
-- gf_reset wrap
-- gf_reset nvtnl_local
-- gf_pipe: suspend_busy_alarm
resume_busy_alarm
suspend_busy_alarm
resume_busy_alarm
suspend_busy_alarm
resume_busy_alarm
suspend_busy_alarm
resume_busy_alarm
suspend_busy_alarm
resume_busy_alarm
done.
comatose(38) returns:"38"
suspend_busy_alarm
resume_busy_alarm
busy_alarm(1, Busy, 00000000, 0)
-- gf_reset escape
-- gf_reset wrap
-- gf_reset nvtnl_local
-- gf_pipe: suspend_busy_alarm
resume_busy_alarm
suspend_busy_alarm
resume_busy_alarm
suspend_busy_alarm
resume_busy_alarm
suspend_busy_alarm
resume_busy_alarm
suspend_busy_alarm
resume_busy_alarm
suspend_busy_alarm
resume_busy_alarm
suspend_busy_alarm
resume_busy_alarm
suspend_busy_alarm
resume_busy_alarm
suspend_busy_alarm
resume_busy_alarm
suspend_busy_alarm
resume_busy_alarm
suspend_busy_alarm
resume_busy_alarm
suspend_busy_alarm
resume_busy_alarm
suspend_busy_alarm
resume_busy_alarm
done.
cancel_busy_alarm(-1)
@@@@ current:29
set_titlebar - style: 3 current message cnt:1 current_pl: 19 total_pl: 44
comatose(29) returns:"29"
comatose(1473) returns:"1,473"
0 ? Help 0
1 O OTHER CMDS 0
2 < MsgIndex 13
3 > ViewAttch 13
4 P PrevMsg 26
5 N NextMsg 26
6 - PrevPage 42
7 Spc NextPage 40
8 D Delete 53
9 U Undelete 53
10 R Reply 66
11 F Forward 66
row: -2, real_row: 22, column: 0
new mail called (0 0 1)
- adrbk_maintenance -
check_point(GoodTime)
freq 12 tm 420 changes 11 since_1st_change 40
since_status_chg 0 chk_cnt_ave 6 (tenths)
adj_chk_cnt_ave 6 (tenths)
Check:if changes(11)xadj_cca(6) >= freq(12)x200
is 66 >= 2400 ?
******** new mail returning -1 ********
Clearing status line
STATUS cmd:120, max:-1, min-1
cancel_busy_alarm(-1)
Read char returning: 105 i
Read command returning: 105 i
New_mail_count zeroed

- process_cmd((504)�) -
PROCESS_CMD return: 0
cancel_busy_alarm(-1)

---- MAIL INDEX ----

---- INDEX MANAGER ----
new mail called (0 2 1)
set_titlebar - style: 2 current message cnt:1 current_pl: 0 total_pl: 0
comatose(29) returns:"29"
comatose(1473) returns:"1,473"
=== setup_header_widths(1473) ===
Hit: Returning 4006e138 -> <+ N 20 Oct 10 #BIR:DIR (143K) FW: Agreement with Middlesex Univers (80), 189881479>
Hit: Returning 4006e190 -> <+ 21 Oct 10 Roberto Souto Pere (621) aditivo para fapesp (80), 20846348>
Hit: Returning 4006e1e8 -> < N 22 Oct 10 Reforme (4,355) V Cong.CLAD: Intervencion Panel 11 (80), 135627198>
Hit: Returning 4006e240 -> < N 23 Oct 10 Hernani Luiz Vila (2,464) Apresenta��o e d�vida (80), 231703483>
Hit: Returning 4006e298 -> <+ 24 Oct 10 Dora Pratt (2,152) noticias (80), 252630435>
Hit: Returning 4006e2f0 -> <+ D 25 Oct 10 Polo, Maria del Ro (3,994) Nuevo bebe!!! (80), 196105479>
Hit: Returning 4006e348 -> < D 26 Oct 10 Jana Bradley (5,231) Travel Award to ALA in San Francisco (80), 164004379>
Hit: Returning 4006e3a0 -> < D 27 Oct 10 Roberta Segreti (7,518) Fwd: ALA San Francisco Student Trave (80), 81677029>
Hit: Returning 4006e3f8 -> <+ D 28 Oct 10 Oliveira, Cristian (4,746) RE: Consultora Legislacao - Alimento (80), 21550813>
=== format_index_line(29,1445) ===
Parse date: "Tue, 10 Oct 2000 11:41:27 -0300 (SAT)" to.. hours_off_gmt:-3 min_off_gmt:0
Parse date: wkday:2 month:10 year:2000 day:10 hour:11 min:41 sec:27
comatose(1695) returns:"1,695"
INDEX(4006e450) -->+ 29 Oct 10 Ana Maria C. Arauj (1,695) Re: sugestao <-- (80), 103860807>
Hit: Returning 4006e4a8 -> < N 30 Oct 10 Taruhn, Rosane (BI (3,738) [Gerentes-l] RE: [Gerentes-l] Re: su (80), 104713684>
Hit: Returning 4006e500 -> <+ N 31 Oct 10 Castro, Elenice de (2,050) mensagem do Pedro (80), 127876467>
Hit: Returning 4006e558 -> <+ N 32 Oct 10 Pedro Urra (8,003) Fwd: Returned mail: Can't create out (80), 224804631>
Hit: Returning 4006e5b0 -> <+ N 33 Oct 10 To: Abel L. Packer (860) Direccion de correo (fwd) (80), 197679491>
Hit: Returning 4006e608 -> < N 34 Oct 10 To: Ana Maria C. A (2,378) [Gerentes-l] Re: sugestao (80), 262852050>
Hit: Returning 4006e660 -> <+ N 35 Oct 10 #BIR:DIR (3,737) FW: Boletim Peri�dico Empresa - Ano (80), 83007618>
Hit: Returning 4006e6b8 -> < N 36 Oct 10 [email protected] (2,563) (no subject) (80), 243080280>
Hit: Returning 4006e710 -> <+ N 37 Oct 10 Marcia Ymanaka Bar (1,538) [Fwd: Re: Fw: Listserver for the Fri (80), 43994603>
Hit: Returning 4006e768 -> < N 38 Oct 10 Julio A moutinho (1,348) Re: Contents of file: 200.134.245.11 (80), 2629033>
0 ? Help 0
1 O OTHER CMDS 0
2 < FldrList 13
3 > [ViewMsg] 13
4 P PrevMsg 26
5 N NextMsg 26
6 - PrevPage 42
7 Spc NextPage 40
8 D Delete 53
9 U Undelete 53
10 R Reply 66
11 F Forward 66
row: -2, real_row: 22, column: 0
STATUS cmd:120, max:-1, min-1
cancel_busy_alarm(-1)
Read char returning: 115 s
Read command returning: 115 s
New_mail_count zeroed

- process_cmd((714)�) -

- saving message -
=== optionally_enter called ===
string:"" y:0 x:-3 length: 1024 append: 1
passwd:0 prompt:"SAVE Msg #29 to folder [saved-Oct-98] : " label:"To Fldrs"
suspend_busy_alarm
0 ^G Help 0
1 ^C Cancel 0
2 ^T To Fldrs 14
3 Ret Accept 13
4 (null) (null) 26
5 (null) (null) 26
6 (null) (null) 40
7 (null) (null) 40
8 (null) (null) 53
9 (null) (null) 53
10 (null) (null) 66
11 (null) (null) 66
row: -2, real_row: 22, column: 0
Read char returning: 112 p
Read char returning: 101 e
Read char returning: 115 s
Read char returning: 115 s
Read char returning: 111 o
Read char returning: 97 a
Read char returning: 108 l
Read char returning: 13 RETURN
resume_busy_alarm
same_stream: mail/pessoal == /var/mail/abel
same_stream: no dice
busy_alarm(1, Busy, 00000000, 0)
mm_list "mail/pessoal": delim: '/', , no inferiors, marked
cancel_busy_alarm(-1)
busy_alarm(1, Busy, 00000000, 0)
same_stream: mail/pessoal == /var/mail/abel
same_stream: no dice
same_stream: mail/pessoal == /var/mail/abel
same_stream: no dice
Done with IMAP critical on
Done with IMAP critical on
cancel_busy_alarm(0)
q_status_message(Message 29 copied to folder "pessoal" an)
new mail called (0 2 1)
set_titlebar - style: 2 current message cnt:1 current_pl: 0 total_pl: 0
comatose(29) returns:"29"
comatose(1473) returns:"1,473"
Hit: Returning 4006e138 -> <+ N 20 Oct 10 #BIR:DIR (143K) FW: Agreement with Middlesex Univers (80), 189881479>
Hit: Returning 4006e190 -> <+ 21 Oct 10 Roberto Souto Pere (621) aditivo para fapesp (80), 20846348>
Hit: Returning 4006e1e8 -> < N 22 Oct 10 Reforme (4,355) V Cong.CLAD: Intervencion Panel 11 (80), 135627198>
Hit: Returning 4006e240 -> < N 23 Oct 10 Hernani Luiz Vila (2,464) Apresenta��o e d�vida (80), 231703483>
Hit: Returning 4006e298 -> <+ 24 Oct 10 Dora Pratt (2,152) noticias (80), 252630435>
Hit: Returning 4006e2f0 -> <+ D 25 Oct 10 Polo, Maria del Ro (3,994) Nuevo bebe!!! (80), 196105479>
Hit: Returning 4006e348 -> < D 26 Oct 10 Jana Bradley (5,231) Travel Award to ALA in San Francisco (80), 164004379>
Hit: Returning 4006e3a0 -> < D 27 Oct 10 Roberta Segreti (7,518) Fwd: ALA San Francisco Student Trave (80), 81677029>
Hit: Returning 4006e3f8 -> <+ D 28 Oct 10 Oliveira, Cristian (4,746) RE: Consultora Legislacao - Alimento (80), 21550813>
=== format_index_line(29,1445) ===
Parse date: "Tue, 10 Oct 2000 11:41:27 -0300 (SAT)" to.. hours_off_gmt:-3 min_off_gmt:0
Parse date: wkday:2 month:10 year:2000 day:10 hour:11 min:41 sec:27
comatose(1695) returns:"1,695"
INDEX(4006e450) -->+ D 29 Oct 10 Ana Maria C. Arauj (1,695) Re: sugestao <-- (80), 103860843>
Hit: Returning 4006e4a8 -> < N 30 Oct 10 Taruhn, Rosane (BI (3,738) [Gerentes-l] RE: [Gerentes-l] Re: su (80), 104713684>
Hit: Returning 4006e500 -> <+ N 31 Oct 10 Castro, Elenice de (2,050) mensagem do Pedro (80), 127876467>
Hit: Returning 4006e558 -> <+ N 32 Oct 10 Pedro Urra (8,003) Fwd: Returned mail: Can't create out (80), 224804631>
Hit: Returning 4006e5b0 -> <+ N 33 Oct 10 To: Abel L. Packer (860) Direccion de correo (fwd) (80), 197679491>
Hit: Returning 4006e608 -> < N 34 Oct 10 To: Ana Maria C. A (2,378) [Gerentes-l] Re: sugestao (80), 262852050>
Hit: Returning 4006e660 -> <+ N 35 Oct 10 #BIR:DIR (3,737) FW: Boletim Peri�dico Empresa - Ano (80), 83007618>
Hit: Returning 4006e6b8 -> < N 36 Oct 10 [email protected] (2,563) (no subject) (80), 243080280>
Hit: Returning 4006e710 -> <+ N 37 Oct 10 Marcia Ymanaka Bar (1,538) [Fwd: Re: Fw: Listserver for the Fri (80), 43994603>
Hit: Returning 4006e768 -> < N 38 Oct 10 Julio A moutinho (1,348) Re: Contents of file: 200.134.245.11 (80), 2629033>
0 ? Help 0
1 O OTHER CMDS 0
2 < FldrList 13
3 > [ViewMsg] 13
4 P PrevMsg 26
5 N NextMsg 26
6 - PrevPage 42
7 Spc NextPage 40
8 D Delete 53
9 U Undelete 53
10 R Reply 66
11 F Forward 66
row: -2, real_row: 22, column: 0
output_message(Message 29 copied to folder "pessoal" and deleted)
STATUS cmd:115, max:3, min0
cancel_busy_alarm(-1)
Read char returning: 2066 Down Arrow
Read command returning: 2066 Down Arrow
New_mail_count zeroed

- process_cmd((700)�) -
new mail called (0 2 1)
comatose(30) returns:"30"
Hit: Returning 4006e138 -> <+ N 20 Oct 10 #BIR:DIR (143K) FW: Agreement with Middlesex Univers (80), 189881479>
Hit: Returning 4006e190 -> <+ 21 Oct 10 Roberto Souto Pere (621) aditivo para fapesp (80), 20846348>
Hit: Returning 4006e1e8 -> < N 22 Oct 10 Reforme (4,355) V Cong.CLAD: Intervencion Panel 11 (80), 135627198>
Hit: Returning 4006e240 -> < N 23 Oct 10 Hernani Luiz Vila (2,464) Apresenta��o e d�vida (80), 231703483>
Hit: Returning 4006e298 -> <+ 24 Oct 10 Dora Pratt (2,152) noticias (80), 252630435>
Hit: Returning 4006e2f0 -> <+ D 25 Oct 10 Polo, Maria del Ro (3,994) Nuevo bebe!!! (80), 196105479>
Hit: Returning 4006e348 -> < D 26 Oct 10 Jana Bradley (5,231) Travel Award to ALA in San Francisco (80), 164004379>
Hit: Returning 4006e3a0 -> < D 27 Oct 10 Roberta Segreti (7,518) Fwd: ALA San Francisco Student Trave (80), 81677029>
Hit: Returning 4006e3f8 -> <+ D 28 Oct 10 Oliveira, Cristian (4,746) RE: Consultora Legislacao - Alimento (80), 21550813>
Hit: Returning 4006e450 -> <+ D 29 Oct 10 Ana Maria C. Arauj (1,695) Re: sugestao (80), 103860843>
Hit: Returning 4006e4a8 -> < N 30 Oct 10 Taruhn, Rosane (BI (3,738) [Gerentes-l] RE: [Gerentes-l] Re: su (80), 104713684>
Hit: Returning 4006e500 -> <+ N 31 Oct 10 Castro, Elenice de (2,050) mensagem do Pedro (80), 127876467>
Hit: Returning 4006e558 -> <+ N 32 Oct 10 Pedro Urra (8,003) Fwd: Returned mail: Can't create out (80), 224804631>
Hit: Returning 4006e5b0 -> <+ N 33 Oct 10 To: Abel L. Packer (860) Direccion de correo (fwd) (80), 197679491>
Hit: Returning 4006e608 -> < N 34 Oct 10 To: Ana Maria C. A (2,378) [Gerentes-l] Re: sugestao (80), 262852050>
Hit: Returning 4006e660 -> <+ N 35 Oct 10 #BIR:DIR (3,737) FW: Boletim Peri�dico Empresa - Ano (80), 83007618>
Hit: Returning 4006e6b8 -> < N 36 Oct 10 [email protected] (2,563) (no subject) (80), 243080280>
Hit: Returning 4006e710 -> <+ N 37 Oct 10 Marcia Ymanaka Bar (1,538) [Fwd: Re: Fw: Listserver for the Fri (80), 43994603>
Hit: Returning 4006e768 -> < N 38 Oct 10 Julio A moutinho (1,348) Re: Contents of file: 200.134.245.11 (80), 2629033>
STATUS: diff:0, displayed: 971211761, now: 971211761
d_q_status_message(Message 29 copied to folder "pessoal" an)
Clearing status line
STATUS cmd:2066, max:-1, min-1
cancel_busy_alarm(-1)
Read char returning: 13 RETURN
Read command returning: 13 RETURN
New_mail_count zeroed

- process_cmd((505)�) -

----- MAIL VIEW -----
busy_alarm(1, Busy, 00000000, 0)
-- gf_reset local_nvtnl
-- gf_reset wrap
-- gf_reset nvtnl_local
-- gf_pipe: suspend_busy_alarm
resume_busy_alarm
suspend_busy_alarm
resume_busy_alarm
suspend_busy_alarm
resume_busy_alarm
suspend_busy_alarm
resume_busy_alarm
suspend_busy_alarm
resume_busy_alarm
done.
comatose(62) returns:"62"
suspend_busy_alarm
resume_busy_alarm
busy_alarm(1, Busy, 00000000, 0)
-- gf_reset escape
-- gf_reset wrap
-- gf_reset nvtnl_local
-- gf_pipe: suspend_busy_alarm
resume_busy_alarm
suspend_busy_alarm
resume_busy_alarm
suspend_busy_alarm
resume_busy_alarm
suspend_busy_alarm
resume_busy_alarm
suspend_busy_alarm
resume_busy_alarm
suspend_busy_alarm
resume_busy_alarm
suspend_busy_alarm
resume_busy_alarm
suspend_busy_alarm
resume_busy_alarm
suspend_busy_alarm
resume_busy_alarm
suspend_busy_alarm
resume_busy_alarm
suspend_busy_alarm
resume_busy_alarm
suspend_busy_alarm
resume_busy_alarm
suspend_busy_alarm
resume_busy_alarm
done.
cancel_busy_alarm(-1)
@@@@ current:30
set_titlebar - style: 3 current message cnt:1 current_pl: 19 total_pl: 68
comatose(30) returns:"30"
comatose(1473) returns:"1,473"
0 ? Help 0
1 O OTHER CMDS 0
2 < MsgIndex 13
3 > ViewAttch 13
4 P PrevMsg 26
5 N NextMsg 26
6 - PrevPage 42
7 Spc NextPage 40
8 D Delete 53
9 U Undelete 53
10 R Reply 66
11 F Forward 66
row: -2, real_row: 22, column: 0
new mail called (0 0 1)
- adrbk_maintenance -
check_point(GoodTime)
freq 12 tm 420 changes 15 since_1st_change 53
since_status_chg 0 chk_cnt_ave 7 (tenths)
adj_chk_cnt_ave 7 (tenths)
Check:if changes(15)xadj_cca(7) >= freq(12)x200
is 105 >= 2400 ?
******** new mail returning -1 ********
Clearing status line
STATUS cmd:120, max:-1, min-1
cancel_busy_alarm(-1)
Read char returning: 2066 Down Arrow
Read command returning: 2066 Down Arrow
New_mail_count zeroed
@@@@ current:30
new mail called (0 2 1)
STATUS cmd:2066, max:-1, min-1
cancel_busy_alarm(-1)
Read char returning: 2066 Down Arrow
Read command returning: 2066 Down Arrow
New_mail_count zeroed
@@@@ current:30
new mail called (0 2 1)
STATUS cmd:2066, max:-1, min-1
cancel_busy_alarm(-1)
Read char returning: 2066 Down Arrow
Read command returning: 2066 Down Arrow
New_mail_count zeroed
@@@@ current:30
new mail called (0 2 1)
check_point(VeryBadTime)
freq 48 tm 1260 changes 15 since_1st_change 99
since_status_chg 460 chk_cnt_ave 7 (tenths)
adj_chk_cnt_ave 200 (tenths)
Check:if changes(15)xadj_cca(200) >= freq(48)x200
is 3000 >= 9600 ?
******** new mail returning -1 ********
STATUS cmd:2066, max:-1, min-1
cancel_busy_alarm(-1)
Read char returning: 2066 Down Arrow
Read command returning: 2066 Down Arrow
New_mail_count zeroed
@@@@ current:30
new mail called (0 2 1)
STATUS cmd:2066, max:-1, min-1
cancel_busy_alarm(-1)
Read char returning: 2066 Down Arrow
Read command returning: 2066 Down Arrow
New_mail_count zeroed
@@@@ current:30
new mail called (0 2 1)
STATUS cmd:2066, max:-1, min-1
cancel_busy_alarm(-1)
Read char returning: 2066 Down Arrow
Read command returning: 2066 Down Arrow
New_mail_count zeroed
@@@@ current:30
new mail called (0 2 1)
STATUS cmd:2066, max:-1, min-1
cancel_busy_alarm(-1)
Read char returning: 2066 Down Arrow
Read command returning: 2066 Down Arrow
New_mail_count zeroed
@@@@ current:30
new mail called (0 2 1)
STATUS cmd:2066, max:-1, min-1
cancel_busy_alarm(-1)
Read char returning: 2066 Down Arrow
Read command returning: 2066 Down Arrow
New_mail_count zeroed
@@@@ current:30
new mail called (0 2 1)
STATUS cmd:2066, max:-1, min-1
cancel_busy_alarm(-1)
Read char returning: 2066 Down Arrow
Read command returning: 2066 Down Arrow
New_mail_count zeroed
@@@@ current:30
new mail called (0 2 1)
STATUS cmd:2066, max:-1, min-1
cancel_busy_alarm(-1)
Read char returning: 2066 Down Arrow
Read command returning: 2066 Down Arrow
New_mail_count zeroed
@@@@ current:30
new mail called (0 2 1)
STATUS cmd:2066, max:-1, min-1
cancel_busy_alarm(-1)
Read char returning: 2066 Down Arrow
Read command returning: 2066 Down Arrow
New_mail_count zeroed
@@@@ current:30
new mail called (0 2 1)
STATUS cmd:2066, max:-1, min-1
cancel_busy_alarm(-1)
Read char returning: 2066 Down Arrow
Read command returning: 2066 Down Arrow
New_mail_count zeroed
@@@@ current:30
new mail called (0 2 1)
STATUS cmd:2066, max:-1, min-1
cancel_busy_alarm(-1)
Read char returning: 2066 Down Arrow
Read command returning: 2066 Down Arrow
New_mail_count zeroed
@@@@ current:30
new mail called (0 2 1)
STATUS cmd:2066, max:-1, min-1
cancel_busy_alarm(-1)
Read char returning: 2066 Down Arrow
Read command returning: 2066 Down Arrow
New_mail_count zeroed
@@@@ current:30
new mail called (0 2 1)
STATUS cmd:2066, max:-1, min-1
cancel_busy_alarm(-1)
Read char returning: 2066 Down Arrow
Read command returning: 2066 Down Arrow
New_mail_count zeroed
@@@@ current:30
new mail called (0 2 1)
STATUS cmd:2066, max:-1, min-1
cancel_busy_alarm(-1)
Read char returning: 2066 Down Arrow
Read command returning: 2066 Down Arrow
New_mail_count zeroed
@@@@ current:30
new mail called (0 2 1)
STATUS cmd:2066, max:-1, min-1
cancel_busy_alarm(-1)
Read char returning: 102 f
Read command returning: 102 f
New_mail_count zeroed

- process_cmd((706)�) -

- forward -
checking subject: "[Gerentes-l] RE: [Gerentes-l] Re: sugestao"
open_patterns()
get_signature(/users/abel/.signature)
-- gf_reset local_nvtnl
-- gf_reset wrap
-- gf_reset nvtnl_local
-- gf_pipe: done.
busy_alarm(1, Busy, 00000000, 0)
busy_alarm(1, Busy, 00000000, 0)
-- gf_reset nvtnl_local
-- gf_pipe: done.
cancel_busy_alarm(-1)

=== send called ===
set_titlebar - style: 1 current message cnt:1 current_pl: 0 total_pl: 0
comatose(1473) returns:"1,473"
flags: 80000040
cancel_busy_alarm(-1)

---- COMPOSER ----
fix_windsize()
new win size -----<24 80>------
Clearing status line
STATUS cmd:24, max:-1, min-1
New_mail_count zeroed
New_mail_count zeroed
New_mail_count zeroed
New_mail_count zeroed
New_mail_count zeroed
New_mail_count zeroed
New_mail_count zeroed
- build_address - (brmdir)
- build_address_internal - (brmdir)
- init_ab_if_needed -
-- init_addrbooks(Closed, 0, 0, 1) --
- addrbook_access -
- init_abook -
addrbook nickname = .addressbook filename = /users/abel/.addressbook ostatus was TotallyClosed, want Closed
- warp_to_beginning -
- save_state -
- expand_address - (brmdir)
- adrbk_lookup_with_opens_by_nick(brmdir) -
- init_abook -
addrbook nickname = .addressbook filename = /users/abel/.addressbook ostatus was Closed, want NoDisplay
- adrbk_open(/users/abel/.addressbook) -
copy_file(/users/abel/.addressbook, 0) -
- valid_hfile -
- get_timestamp_from_disk -
- valid_hfile -
- get_timestamp_from_disk -
busy_alarm(1, Busy, 00000000, 0)
- bld_hash_from_ondisk_hash -
initializing hash_by_nick
initializing hash_by_addr
cancel_busy_alarm(-1)
- init_entryref_cache -
- adrbk_set_nominal_cachesize - was 0 now 82
- init_entryref_cache -
- clear_entryref_cache -
- adrbk_is_in_sort_order -
- get_sort_rule_from_disk -
Address book .addressbook (/users/abel/.addressbook) opened with 82 items
- adrbk_clearrefs -
- adrbk_lookup_by_nick(brmdir) (in /users/abel/.addressbook) -
- adrbk_lookup_by_addr([email protected]) (in /users/abel/.addressbook) -
- restore_state -
- init_disp_form(.addressbook) -
- init_abook -
addrbook nickname = .addressbook filename = /users/abel/.addressbook ostatus was NoDisplay, want Closed
- adrbk_partial_close(/users/abel/.addressbook) -
- init_entryref_cache -
- clear_entryref_cache -
- warp_to_dlc(0) -
New_mail_count zeroed
- build_address - ()
fix_windsize()
new win size -----<24 80>------
suspend_busy_alarm
0 ? Help 1
1 ^C Cancel 0
2 Y [Yes] 13
3 N No 13
4 (null) (null) 26
5 (null) (null) 26
6 (null) (null) 40
7 (null) (null) 40
8 (null) (null) 53
9 (null) (null) 53
10 (null) (null) 66
11 (null) (null) 66
row: -2, real_row: 22, column: 0
Read char returning: 121 y
Want_to read: y (121)
resume_busy_alarm
.. composer returns (0x4)
fix_windsize()
new win size -----<24 80>------
init_signals()
busy_alarm(1, Busy, 00000000, 0)
busy_alarm(1, Busy, 00000000, 0)
busy_alarm(1, Busy, 00000000, 0)
-- pine_encode_body: 0
cancel_busy_alarm(-1)
=== sending: build_folder_list: mail/%s sent-mail
busy_alarm(1, Busy, 00000000, 0)
mm_list "mail/sent-mail": delim: '/', , no inferiors, marked
cancel_busy_alarm(-1)
Sending mail...
busy_alarm(1, Sending mail, 4002ae4a, 1)
q_status_message(Sending mail | |)
output_message(Sending mail | |)
STATUS cmd:120, max:1, min0
call_mailer: via "/usr/sbin/sendmail -bs -odb -oem"
Opening pipe: "/usr/sbin/sendmail -bs -odb -oem" (WRNP)
PID: 21913, COMMAND: /usr/sbin/sendmail -bs -odb -oem
IMAP DEBUG 18:03:37 10/10: 220 brm.bireme.br ESMTP Sendmail 8.9.3/8.9.3; Tue, 10 Oct 2000 18:03:37 -0300 (SAT)
IMAP DEBUG 18:03:37 10/10: EHLO localhost
IMAP DEBUG 18:03:37 10/10: 250-brm.bireme.br Hello abel@localhost, pleased to meet you
IMAP DEBUG 18:03:37 10/10: 250-EXPN
IMAP DEBUG 18:03:37 10/10: 250-VERB
IMAP DEBUG 18:03:37 10/10: 250-8BITMIME
IMAP DEBUG 18:03:37 10/10: 250-SIZE
IMAP DEBUG 18:03:37 10/10: 250-DSN
IMAP DEBUG 18:03:37 10/10: 250-ONEX
IMAP DEBUG 18:03:37 10/10: 250-ETRN
IMAP DEBUG 18:03:37 10/10: 250-XUSR
IMAP DEBUG 18:03:37 10/10: 250 HELP
Opened SMTP server "brm.bireme.br"
IMAP DEBUG 18:03:37 10/10: RSET
IMAP DEBUG 18:03:37 10/10: 250 Reset state
IMAP DEBUG 18:03:37 10/10: MAIL FROM:<[email protected]>
IMAP DEBUG 18:03:37 10/10: 250 <[email protected]>... Sender ok
IMAP DEBUG 18:03:37 10/10: RCPT TO:<[email protected]>
IMAP DEBUG 18:03:37 10/10: 250 <[email protected]>... Recipient ok
IMAP DEBUG 18:03:37 10/10: DATA
IMAP DEBUG 18:03:37 10/10: 354 Enter mail, end with "." on a line by itself
-- pine_rfc822_output
busy_alarm(1, Busy, 00000000, 0)
-- pine_encode_body: 0
-- pine_rfc822_output_body: 0
-- pine_rfc822_output_body: segment 2546 bytes
-- gf_reset local_nvtnl
-- gf_reset 8bit_qp
-- gf_pipe: done.
IMAP DEBUG 18:03:37 10/10: .
IMAP DEBUG 18:03:37 10/10: 250 SAA21914 Message accepted for delivery
IMAP DEBUG 18:03:37 10/10: QUIT
SIGCHLD raised
IMAP DEBUG 18:03:37 10/10: 221 brm.bireme.br closing connection
cancel_busy_alarm(0)
q_status_message(Sending mail | 100% |)
Writing Fcc
busy_alarm(1, Writing Fcc, 00000000, 1)
q_status_message(Writing Fcc )
STATUS: diff:0, displayed: 971211817, now: 971211817
d_q_status_message(Sending mail | |)
d_q_status_message(Sending mail | 100% |)
output_message(Writing Fcc )
STATUS cmd:120, max:1, min0
same_stream: mail/sent-mail == /var/mail/abel
same_stream: no dice
Done with IMAP critical on
Done with IMAP critical on
cancel_busy_alarm(0)
q_status_message(Writing Fcc DONE)
done.
q_status_message(Message sent and copied to "sent-mail".)
=== send returning ===
PROCESS_CMD return: 0
@@@@ current:30
set_titlebar - style: 3 current message cnt:1 current_pl: 35 total_pl: 68
comatose(30) returns:"30"
comatose(1473) returns:"1,473"
0 ? Help 0
1 O OTHER CMDS 0
2 < MsgIndex 13
3 > ViewAttch 13
4 P PrevMsg 26
5 N NextMsg 26
6 - PrevPage 42
7 Spc NextPage 40
8 D Delete 53
9 U Undelete 53
10 R Reply 66
11 F Forward 66
row: -2, real_row: 22, column: 0
new mail called (0 2 1)
STATUS: diff:-1, displayed: 971211817, now: 971211818
d_q_status_message(Writing Fcc )
d_q_status_message(Writing Fcc DONE)
output_message(Message sent and copied to "sent-mail".)
STATUS cmd:102, max:3, min0
cancel_busy_alarm(-1)
Read char returning: 114 r
Read command returning: 114 r
New_mail_count zeroed

- process_cmd((705)�) -
comatose(1) returns:"1"

- reply (1 msgs) -
suspend_busy_alarm
d_q_status_message(Message sent and copied to "sent-mail".)
0 (null) (null) 2
1 ^C Cancel 0
2 Y Yes 13
3 N [No] 13
4 (null) (null) 26
5 (null) (null) 26
6 (null) (null) 40
7 (null) (null) 40
8 (null) (null) 53
9 (null) (null) 53
10 (null) (null) 66
11 (null) (null) 66
row: -2, real_row: 22, column: 0
Read char returning: 121 y
Want_to read: y (121)
resume_busy_alarm
suspend_busy_alarm
0 (null) (null) 2
1 ^C Cancel 0
2 Y [Yes] 13
3 N No 13
4 (null) (null) 26
5 (null) (null) 26
6 (null) (null) 40
7 (null) (null) 40
8 (null) (null) 53
9 (null) (null) 53
10 (null) (null) 66
11 (null) (null) 66
row: -2, real_row: 22, column: 0
Read char returning: 121 y
Want_to read: y (121)
resume_busy_alarm
- build_address - ("'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>)
- adrbk_check_and_fix_all -
- adrbk_check_and_fix(/users/abel/.addressbook) -
- adrbk_check_validity(/users/abel/.addressbook) -
- adrbk_check_local_validity(/users/abel/.addressbook) -
- build_address_internal - ("'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>)
- init_ab_if_needed -
- save_state -
- expand_address - ("'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>)
- init_abook -
addrbook nickname = .addressbook filename = /users/abel/.addressbook ostatus was Closed, want NoDisplay
- adrbk_check_and_fix(/users/abel/.addressbook) -
- adrbk_check_validity(/users/abel/.addressbook) -
- adrbk_check_local_validity(/users/abel/.addressbook) -
- adrbk_lookup_by_addr([email protected]) (in /users/abel/.addressbook) -
adrbk_get_entryref(/users/abel/.addressbook) - elem=67 (Normal)
adrbk_get_entryref(/users/abel/.addressbook) - elem=42 (Normal)
- adrbk_get_ae -
adrbk_get_entryref(/users/abel/.addressbook) - elem=42 (Normal)
- restore_state -
- init_disp_form(.addressbook) -
- init_abook -
addrbook nickname = .addressbook filename = /users/abel/.addressbook ostatus was NoDisplay, want Closed
- adrbk_partial_close(/users/abel/.addressbook) -
- init_entryref_cache -
- clear_entryref_cache -
- warp_to_dlc(0) -
open_patterns()
get_signature(/users/abel/.signature)
Parse date: "Tue, 10 Oct 2000 11:56:23 -0300" to.. hours_off_gmt:-3 min_off_gmt:0
Parse date: wkday:2 month:10 year:2000 day:10 hour:11 min:56 sec:23
busy_alarm(1, Busy, 00000000, 0)
busy_alarm(1, Busy, 00000000, 0)
-- gf_reset prefix
-- gf_reset nvtnl_local
-- gf_pipe: done.
cancel_busy_alarm(-1)

=== send called ===
set_titlebar - style: 1 current message cnt:1 current_pl: 0 total_pl: 0
comatose(1473) returns:"1,473"
flags: 80000040
cancel_busy_alarm(-1)

---- COMPOSER ----
fix_windsize()
new win size -----<24 80>------
Clearing status line
STATUS cmd:24, max:-1, min-1
New_mail_count zeroed
fix_windsize()
new win size -----<24 80>------
suspend_busy_alarm
0 ? Help 1
1 ^C Cancel 0
2 Y [Yes] 13
3 N No 13
4 (null) (null) 26
5 (null) (null) 26
6 (null) (null) 40
7 (null) (null) 40
8 (null) (null) 53
9 (null) (null) 53
10 (null) (null) 66
11 (null) (null) 66
row: -2, real_row: 22, column: 0
Read char returning: 121 y
Want_to read: y (121)
resume_busy_alarm
.. composer returns (0x5)
fix_windsize()
new win size -----<24 80>------
init_signals()
busy_alarm(1, Busy, 00000000, 0)
busy_alarm(1, Busy, 00000000, 0)
busy_alarm(1, Busy, 00000000, 0)
-- pine_encode_body: 0
cancel_busy_alarm(-1)
=== sending: build_folder_list: mail/%s sent-mail
busy_alarm(1, Busy, 00000000, 0)
mm_list "mail/sent-mail": delim: '/', , no inferiors, marked
cancel_busy_alarm(-1)
Sending mail...
busy_alarm(1, Sending mail, 4002ae4a, 1)
q_status_message(Sending mail | |)
output_message(Sending mail | |)
STATUS cmd:120, max:1, min0
call_mailer: via "/usr/sbin/sendmail -bs -odb -oem"
Opening pipe: "/usr/sbin/sendmail -bs -odb -oem" (WRNP)
PID: 21917, COMMAND: /usr/sbin/sendmail -bs -odb -oem
IMAP DEBUG 18:04:10 10/10: 220 brm.bireme.br ESMTP Sendmail 8.9.3/8.9.3; Tue, 10 Oct 2000 18:04:10 -0300 (SAT)
IMAP DEBUG 18:04:10 10/10: EHLO localhost
IMAP DEBUG 18:04:10 10/10: 250-brm.bireme.br Hello abel@localhost, pleased to meet you
IMAP DEBUG 18:04:10 10/10: 250-EXPN
IMAP DEBUG 18:04:10 10/10: 250-VERB
IMAP DEBUG 18:04:10 10/10: 250-8BITMIME
IMAP DEBUG 18:04:10 10/10: 250-SIZE
IMAP DEBUG 18:04:10 10/10: 250-DSN
IMAP DEBUG 18:04:10 10/10: 250-ONEX
IMAP DEBUG 18:04:10 10/10: 250-ETRN
IMAP DEBUG 18:04:10 10/10: 250-XUSR
IMAP DEBUG 18:04:10 10/10: 250 HELP
Opened SMTP server "brm.bireme.br"
IMAP DEBUG 18:04:10 10/10: RSET
IMAP DEBUG 18:04:10 10/10: 250 Reset state
IMAP DEBUG 18:04:10 10/10: MAIL FROM:<[email protected]>
IMAP DEBUG 18:04:10 10/10: 250 <[email protected]>... Sender ok
IMAP DEBUG 18:04:10 10/10: RCPT TO:<[email protected]>
IMAP DEBUG 18:04:10 10/10: 250 <[email protected]>... Recipient ok
IMAP DEBUG 18:04:10 10/10: DATA
IMAP DEBUG 18:04:10 10/10: 354 Enter mail, end with "." on a line by itself
-- pine_rfc822_output
busy_alarm(1, Busy, 00000000, 0)
-- pine_encode_body: 0
-- pine_rfc822_output_body: 0
-- pine_rfc822_output_body: segment 2508 bytes
-- gf_reset local_nvtnl
-- gf_reset 8bit_qp
-- gf_pipe: done.
IMAP DEBUG 18:04:10 10/10: .
IMAP DEBUG 18:04:10 10/10: 250 SAA21918 Message accepted for delivery
IMAP DEBUG 18:04:10 10/10: QUIT
SIGCHLD raised
IMAP DEBUG 18:04:10 10/10: 221 brm.bireme.br closing connection
cancel_busy_alarm(0)
q_status_message(Sending mail | 100% |)
Writing Fcc
busy_alarm(1, Writing Fcc, 00000000, 1)
q_status_message(Writing Fcc )
STATUS: diff:0, displayed: 971211850, now: 971211850
d_q_status_message(Sending mail | |)
d_q_status_message(Sending mail | 100% |)
output_message(Writing Fcc )
STATUS cmd:120, max:1, min0
same_stream: mail/sent-mail == /var/mail/abel
same_stream: no dice
Done with IMAP critical on
Done with IMAP critical on
cancel_busy_alarm(0)
q_status_message(Writing Fcc DONE)
done.
busy_alarm(1, Updating "Answered" Flags, 00000000, 1)
q_status_message(Updating "Answered" Flags )
STATUS: diff:0, displayed: 971211850, now: 971211850
d_q_status_message(Writing Fcc )
d_q_status_message(Writing Fcc DONE)
output_message(Updating "Answered" Flags )
STATUS cmd:120, max:1, min0
cancel_busy_alarm(0)
q_status_message(Updating "Answered" Flags DONE)
q_status_message(Message sent and copied to "sent-mail".)
=== send returning ===
PROCESS_CMD return: 0
@@@@ current:30
set_titlebar - style: 3 current message cnt:1 current_pl: 35 total_pl: 68
comatose(30) returns:"30"
comatose(1473) returns:"1,473"
0 ? Help 0
1 O OTHER CMDS 0
2 < MsgIndex 13
3 > ViewAttch 13
4 P PrevMsg 26
5 N NextMsg 26
6 - PrevPage 42
7 Spc NextPage 40
8 D Delete 53
9 U Undelete 53
10 R Reply 66
11 F Forward 66
row: -2, real_row: 22, column: 0
new mail called (0 2 1)
check_point(VeryBadTime)
freq 48 tm 1260 changes 17 since_1st_change 140
since_status_chg 0 chk_cnt_ave 8 (tenths)
adj_chk_cnt_ave 8 (tenths)
Check:if changes(17)xadj_cca(8) >= freq(48)x200
is 136 >= 9600 ?
Mail_Ping(mail_stream): Tue Oct 10 18:04:10 2000

New mail checked
Ping complete: Tue Oct 10 18:04:10 2000

******** new mail returning -1 ********
STATUS: diff:0, displayed: 971211850, now: 971211850
d_q_status_message(Updating "Answered" Flags )
d_q_status_message(Updating "Answered" Flags DONE)
output_message(Message sent and copied to "sent-mail".)
STATUS cmd:114, max:3, min0
cancel_busy_alarm(-1)
Read char returning: 105 i
Read command returning: 105 i
New_mail_count zeroed

- process_cmd((504)�) -
PROCESS_CMD return: 0
cancel_busy_alarm(-1)

---- MAIL INDEX ----

---- INDEX MANAGER ----
new mail called (0 2 1)
set_titlebar - style: 2 current message cnt:1 current_pl: 0 total_pl: 0
comatose(30) returns:"30"
comatose(1473) returns:"1,473"
=== setup_header_widths(1473) ===
Hit: Returning 4006e138 -> <+ N 20 Oct 10 #BIR:DIR (143K) FW: Agreement with Middlesex Univers (80), 189881479>
Hit: Returning 4006e190 -> <+ 21 Oct 10 Roberto Souto Pere (621) aditivo para fapesp (80), 20846348>
Hit: Returning 4006e1e8 -> < N 22 Oct 10 Reforme (4,355) V Cong.CLAD: Intervencion Panel 11 (80), 135627198>
Hit: Returning 4006e240 -> < N 23 Oct 10 Hernani Luiz Vila (2,464) Apresenta��o e d�vida (80), 231703483>
Hit: Returning 4006e298 -> <+ 24 Oct 10 Dora Pratt (2,152) noticias (80), 252630435>
Hit: Returning 4006e2f0 -> <+ D 25 Oct 10 Polo, Maria del Ro (3,994) Nuevo bebe!!! (80), 196105479>
Hit: Returning 4006e348 -> < D 26 Oct 10 Jana Bradley (5,231) Travel Award to ALA in San Francisco (80), 164004379>
Hit: Returning 4006e3a0 -> < D 27 Oct 10 Roberta Segreti (7,518) Fwd: ALA San Francisco Student Trave (80), 81677029>
Hit: Returning 4006e3f8 -> <+ D 28 Oct 10 Oliveira, Cristian (4,746) RE: Consultora Legislacao - Alimento (80), 21550813>
Hit: Returning 4006e450 -> <+ D 29 Oct 10 Ana Maria C. Arauj (1,695) Re: sugestao (80), 103860843>
=== format_index_line(30,1444) ===
Parse date: "Tue, 10 Oct 2000 11:56:23 -0300" to.. hours_off_gmt:-3 min_off_gmt:0
Parse date: wkday:2 month:10 year:2000 day:10 hour:11 min:56 sec:23
comatose(3738) returns:"3,738"
INDEX(4006e4a8) --> A 30 Oct 10 Taruhn, Rosane (BI (3,738) [Gerentes-l] RE: [Gerentes-l] Re: su<-- (80), 104713671>
Hit: Returning 4006e500 -> <+ N 31 Oct 10 Castro, Elenice de (2,050) mensagem do Pedro (80), 127876467>
Hit: Returning 4006e558 -> <+ N 32 Oct 10 Pedro Urra (8,003) Fwd: Returned mail: Can't create out (80), 224804631>
Hit: Returning 4006e5b0 -> <+ N 33 Oct 10 To: Abel L. Packer (860) Direccion de correo (fwd) (80), 197679491>
Hit: Returning 4006e608 -> < N 34 Oct 10 To: Ana Maria C. A (2,378) [Gerentes-l] Re: sugestao (80), 262852050>
Hit: Returning 4006e660 -> <+ N 35 Oct 10 #BIR:DIR (3,737) FW: Boletim Peri�dico Empresa - Ano (80), 83007618>
Hit: Returning 4006e6b8 -> < N 36 Oct 10 [email protected] (2,563) (no subject) (80), 243080280>
Hit: Returning 4006e710 -> <+ N 37 Oct 10 Marcia Ymanaka Bar (1,538) [Fwd: Re: Fw: Listserver for the Fri (80), 43994603>
Hit: Returning 4006e768 -> < N 38 Oct 10 Julio A moutinho (1,348) Re: Contents of file: 200.134.245.11 (80), 2629033>
0 ? Help 0
1 O OTHER CMDS 0
2 < FldrList 13
3 > [ViewMsg] 13
4 P PrevMsg 26
5 N NextMsg 26
6 - PrevPage 42
7 Spc NextPage 40
8 D Delete 53
9 U Undelete 53
10 R Reply 66
11 F Forward 66
row: -2, real_row: 22, column: 0
STATUS: diff:-1, displayed: 971211850, now: 971211851
d_q_status_message(Message sent and copied to "sent-mail".)
Clearing status line
STATUS cmd:120, max:-1, min-1
cancel_busy_alarm(-1)
Read char returning: 115 s
Read command returning: 115 s
New_mail_count zeroed

- process_cmd((714)�) -

- saving message -
=== optionally_enter called ===
string:"" y:0 x:-3 length: 1024 append: 1
passwd:0 prompt:"SAVE Msg #30 to folder [saved-Oct-98] : " label:"To Fldrs"
suspend_busy_alarm
0 ^G Help 0
1 ^C Cancel 0
2 ^T To Fldrs 14
3 Ret Accept 13
4 (null) (null) 26
5 (null) (null) 26
6 (null) (null) 40
7 (null) (null) 40
8 (null) (null) 53
9 (null) (null) 53
10 (null) (null) 66
11 (null) (null) 66
row: -2, real_row: 22, column: 0
Read char returning: 100 d
Read char returning: 8 ^H
Read char returning: 103 g
Read char returning: 101 e
Read char returning: 114 r
Read char returning: 101 e
Read char returning: 110 n
Read char returning: 116 t
Read char returning: 101 e
Read char returning: 115 s
Read char returning: 13 RETURN
resume_busy_alarm
same_stream: mail/gerentes == /var/mail/abel
same_stream: no dice
busy_alarm(1, Busy, 00000000, 0)
mm_list "mail/gerentes": delim: '/', , no inferiors, marked
cancel_busy_alarm(-1)
busy_alarm(1, Busy, 00000000, 0)
same_stream: mail/gerentes == /var/mail/abel
same_stream: no dice
same_stream: mail/gerentes == /var/mail/abel
same_stream: no dice
Done with IMAP critical on
Done with IMAP critical on
cancel_busy_alarm(0)
q_status_message(Message 30 copied to folder "gerentes" a)
new mail called (0 2 1)
set_titlebar - style: 2 current message cnt:1 current_pl: 0 total_pl: 0
comatose(30) returns:"30"
comatose(1473) returns:"1,473"
Hit: Returning 4006e138 -> <+ N 20 Oct 10 #BIR:DIR (143K) FW: Agreement with Middlesex Univers (80), 189881479>
Hit: Returning 4006e190 -> <+ 21 Oct 10 Roberto Souto Pere (621) aditivo para fapesp (80), 20846348>
Hit: Returning 4006e1e8 -> < N 22 Oct 10 Reforme (4,355) V Cong.CLAD: Intervencion Panel 11 (80), 135627198>
Hit: Returning 4006e240 -> < N 23 Oct 10 Hernani Luiz Vila (2,464) Apresenta��o e d�vida (80), 231703483>
Hit: Returning 4006e298 -> <+ 24 Oct 10 Dora Pratt (2,152) noticias (80), 252630435>
Hit: Returning 4006e2f0 -> <+ D 25 Oct 10 Polo, Maria del Ro (3,994) Nuevo bebe!!! (80), 196105479>
Hit: Returning 4006e348 -> < D 26 Oct 10 Jana Bradley (5,231) Travel Award to ALA in San Francisco (80), 164004379>
Hit: Returning 4006e3a0 -> < D 27 Oct 10 Roberta Segreti (7,518) Fwd: ALA San Francisco Student Trave (80), 81677029>
Hit: Returning 4006e3f8 -> <+ D 28 Oct 10 Oliveira, Cristian (4,746) RE: Consultora Legislacao - Alimento (80), 21550813>
Hit: Returning 4006e450 -> <+ D 29 Oct 10 Ana Maria C. Arauj (1,695) Re: sugestao (80), 103860843>
=== format_index_line(30,1444) ===
Parse date: "Tue, 10 Oct 2000 11:56:23 -0300" to.. hours_off_gmt:-3 min_off_gmt:0
Parse date: wkday:2 month:10 year:2000 day:10 hour:11 min:56 sec:23
comatose(3738) returns:"3,738"
INDEX(4006e4a8) --> D 30 Oct 10 Taruhn, Rosane (BI (3,738) [Gerentes-l] RE: [Gerentes-l] Re: su<-- (80), 104713674>
Hit: Returning 4006e500 -> <+ N 31 Oct 10 Castro, Elenice de (2,050) mensagem do Pedro (80), 127876467>
Hit: Returning 4006e558 -> <+ N 32 Oct 10 Pedro Urra (8,003) Fwd: Returned mail: Can't create out (80), 224804631>
Hit: Returning 4006e5b0 -> <+ N 33 Oct 10 To: Abel L. Packer (860) Direccion de correo (fwd) (80), 197679491>
Hit: Returning 4006e608 -> < N 34 Oct 10 To: Ana Maria C. A (2,378) [Gerentes-l] Re: sugestao (80), 262852050>
Hit: Returning 4006e660 -> <+ N 35 Oct 10 #BIR:DIR (3,737) FW: Boletim Peri�dico Empresa - Ano (80), 83007618>
Hit: Returning 4006e6b8 -> < N 36 Oct 10 [email protected] (2,563) (no subject) (80), 243080280>
Hit: Returning 4006e710 -> <+ N 37 Oct 10 Marcia Ymanaka Bar (1,538) [Fwd: Re: Fw: Listserver for the Fri (80), 43994603>
Hit: Returning 4006e768 -> < N 38 Oct 10 Julio A moutinho (1,348) Re: Contents of file: 200.134.245.11 (80), 2629033>
0 ? Help 0
1 O OTHER CMDS 0
2 < FldrList 13
3 > [ViewMsg] 13
4 P PrevMsg 26
5 N NextMsg 26
6 - PrevPage 42
7 Spc NextPage 40
8 D Delete 53
9 U Undelete 53
10 R Reply 66
11 F Forward 66
row: -2, real_row: 22, column: 0
output_message(Message 30 copied to folder "gerentes" and deleted)
STATUS cmd:115, max:3, min0
cancel_busy_alarm(-1)
Read char returning: 2066 Down Arrow
Read command returning: 2066 Down Arrow
New_mail_count zeroed

- process_cmd((700)�) -
new mail called (0 2 1)
comatose(31) returns:"31"
Hit: Returning 4006e138 -> <+ N 20 Oct 10 #BIR:DIR (143K) FW: Agreement with Middlesex Univers (80), 189881479>
Hit: Returning 4006e190 -> <+ 21 Oct 10 Roberto Souto Pere (621) aditivo para fapesp (80), 20846348>
Hit: Returning 4006e1e8 -> < N 22 Oct 10 Reforme (4,355) V Cong.CLAD: Intervencion Panel 11 (80), 135627198>
Hit: Returning 4006e240 -> < N 23 Oct 10 Hernani Luiz Vila (2,464) Apresenta��o e d�vida (80), 231703483>
Hit: Returning 4006e298 -> <+ 24 Oct 10 Dora Pratt (2,152) noticias (80), 252630435>
Hit: Returning 4006e2f0 -> <+ D 25 Oct 10 Polo, Maria del Ro (3,994) Nuevo bebe!!! (80), 196105479>
Hit: Returning 4006e348 -> < D 26 Oct 10 Jana Bradley (5,231) Travel Award to ALA in San Francisco (80), 164004379>
Hit: Returning 4006e3a0 -> < D 27 Oct 10 Roberta Segreti (7,518) Fwd: ALA San Francisco Student Trave (80), 81677029>
Hit: Returning 4006e3f8 -> <+ D 28 Oct 10 Oliveira, Cristian (4,746) RE: Consultora Legislacao - Alimento (80), 21550813>
Hit: Returning 4006e450 -> <+ D 29 Oct 10 Ana Maria C. Arauj (1,695) Re: sugestao (80), 103860843>
Hit: Returning 4006e4a8 -> < D 30 Oct 10 Taruhn, Rosane (BI (3,738) [Gerentes-l] RE: [Gerentes-l] Re: su (80), 104713674>
Hit: Returning 4006e500 -> <+ N 31 Oct 10 Castro, Elenice de (2,050) mensagem do Pedro (80), 127876467>
Hit: Returning 4006e558 -> <+ N 32 Oct 10 Pedro Urra (8,003) Fwd: Returned mail: Can't create out (80), 224804631>
Hit: Returning 4006e5b0 -> <+ N 33 Oct 10 To: Abel L. Packer (860) Direccion de correo (fwd) (80), 197679491>
Hit: Returning 4006e608 -> < N 34 Oct 10 To: Ana Maria C. A (2,378) [Gerentes-l] Re: sugestao (80), 262852050>
Hit: Returning 4006e660 -> <+ N 35 Oct 10 #BIR:DIR (3,737) FW: Boletim Peri�dico Empresa - Ano (80), 83007618>
Hit: Returning 4006e6b8 -> < N 36 Oct 10 [email protected] (2,563) (no subject) (80), 243080280>
Hit: Returning 4006e710 -> <+ N 37 Oct 10 Marcia Ymanaka Bar (1,538) [Fwd: Re: Fw: Listserver for the Fri (80), 43994603>
Hit: Returning 4006e768 -> < N 38 Oct 10 Julio A moutinho (1,348) Re: Contents of file: 200.134.245.11 (80), 2629033>
STATUS: diff:-1, displayed: 971211860, now: 971211861
d_q_status_message(Message 30 copied to folder "gerentes" a)
Clearing status line
STATUS cmd:2066, max:-1, min-1
cancel_busy_alarm(-1)
Read char returning: 13 RETURN
Read command returning: 13 RETURN
New_mail_count zeroed

- process_cmd((505)�) -

----- MAIL VIEW -----
busy_alarm(1, Busy, 00000000, 0)
-- gf_reset local_nvtnl
-- gf_reset wrap
-- gf_reset nvtnl_local
-- gf_pipe: suspend_busy_alarm
resume_busy_alarm
suspend_busy_alarm
resume_busy_alarm
suspend_busy_alarm
resume_busy_alarm
suspend_busy_alarm
resume_busy_alarm
done.
comatose(46) returns:"46"
suspend_busy_alarm
resume_busy_alarm
busy_alarm(1, Busy, 00000000, 0)
-- gf_reset escape
-- gf_reset wrap
-- gf_reset nvtnl_local
-- gf_pipe: suspend_busy_alarm
resume_busy_alarm
suspend_busy_alarm
resume_busy_alarm
suspend_busy_alarm
resume_busy_alarm
suspend_busy_alarm
resume_busy_alarm
suspend_busy_alarm
resume_busy_alarm
suspend_busy_alarm
resume_busy_alarm
suspend_busy_alarm
resume_busy_alarm
suspend_busy_alarm
resume_busy_alarm
suspend_busy_alarm
resume_busy_alarm
suspend_busy_alarm
resume_busy_alarm
suspend_busy_alarm
resume_busy_alarm
suspend_busy_alarm
resume_busy_alarm
suspend_busy_alarm
resume_busy_alarm
suspend_busy_alarm
resume_busy_alarm
done.
cancel_busy_alarm(-1)
@@@@ current:31
set_titlebar - style: 3 current message cnt:1 current_pl: 19 total_pl: 51
comatose(31) returns:"31"
comatose(1473) returns:"1,473"
0 ? Help 0
1 O OTHER CMDS 0
2 < MsgIndex 13
3 > ViewAttch 13
4 P PrevMsg 26
5 N NextMsg 26
6 - PrevPage 42
7 Spc NextPage 40
8 D Delete 53
9 U Undelete 53
10 R Reply 66
11 F Forward 66
row: -2, real_row: 22, column: 0
new mail called (0 0 1)
- adrbk_maintenance -
check_point(GoodTime)
freq 12 tm 420 changes 21 since_1st_change 152
since_status_chg 10 chk_cnt_ave 5 (tenths)
adj_chk_cnt_ave 7 (tenths)
Check:if changes(21)xadj_cca(7) >= freq(12)x200
is 147 >= 2400 ?
******** new mail returning -1 ********
Clearing status line
STATUS cmd:120, max:-1, min-1
cancel_busy_alarm(-1)
Read char returning: 2066 Down Arrow
Read command returning: 2066 Down Arrow
New_mail_count zeroed
@@@@ current:31
new mail called (0 2 1)
STATUS cmd:2066, max:-1, min-1
cancel_busy_alarm(-1)
Read char returning: 2066 Down Arrow
Read command returning: 2066 Down Arrow
New_mail_count zeroed
@@@@ current:31
new mail called (0 2 1)
STATUS cmd:2066, max:-1, min-1
cancel_busy_alarm(-1)
Read char returning: 2066 Down Arrow
Read command returning: 2066 Down Arrow
New_mail_count zeroed
@@@@ current:31
new mail called (0 2 1)
STATUS cmd:2066, max:-1, min-1
cancel_busy_alarm(-1)
Read char returning: 2066 Down Arrow
Read command returning: 2066 Down Arrow
New_mail_count zeroed
@@@@ current:31
new mail called (0 2 1)
STATUS cmd:2066, max:-1, min-1
cancel_busy_alarm(-1)
Read char returning: 2066 Down Arrow
Read command returning: 2066 Down Arrow
New_mail_count zeroed
@@@@ current:31
new mail called (0 2 1)
STATUS cmd:2066, max:-1, min-1
cancel_busy_alarm(-1)
Read char returning: 2066 Down Arrow
Read command returning: 2066 Down Arrow
New_mail_count zeroed
@@@@ current:31
new mail called (0 2 1)
STATUS cmd:2066, max:-1, min-1
cancel_busy_alarm(-1)
Read char returning: 2066 Down Arrow
Read command returning: 2066 Down Arrow
New_mail_count zeroed
@@@@ current:31
new mail called (0 2 1)
STATUS cmd:2066, max:-1, min-1
cancel_busy_alarm(-1)
Read char returning: 2066 Down Arrow
Read command returning: 2066 Down Arrow
New_mail_count zeroed
@@@@ current:31
new mail called (0 2 1)
STATUS cmd:2066, max:-1, min-1
cancel_busy_alarm(-1)
Read char returning: 2066 Down Arrow
Read command returning: 2066 Down Arrow
New_mail_count zeroed
@@@@ current:31
new mail called (0 2 1)
STATUS cmd:2066, max:-1, min-1
cancel_busy_alarm(-1)
Read char returning: 2066 Down Arrow
Read command returning: 2066 Down Arrow
New_mail_count zeroed
@@@@ current:31
new mail called (0 2 1)
STATUS cmd:2066, max:-1, min-1
cancel_busy_alarm(-1)
Read char returning: 2066 Down Arrow
Read command returning: 2066 Down Arrow
New_mail_count zeroed
@@@@ current:31
new mail called (0 2 1)
STATUS cmd:2066, max:-1, min-1
cancel_busy_alarm(-1)
Read char returning: 2066 Down Arrow
Read command returning: 2066 Down Arrow
New_mail_count zeroed
@@@@ current:31
new mail called (0 2 1)
STATUS cmd:2066, max:-1, min-1
cancel_busy_alarm(-1)
Read char returning: 2066 Down Arrow
Read command returning: 2066 Down Arrow
New_mail_count zeroed
@@@@ current:31
new mail called (0 2 1)
STATUS cmd:2066, max:-1, min-1
cancel_busy_alarm(-1)
Read char returning: 2066 Down Arrow
Read command returning: 2066 Down Arrow
New_mail_count zeroed
@@@@ current:31
new mail called (0 2 1)
check_point(VeryBadTime)
freq 48 tm 1260 changes 21 since_1st_change 175
since_status_chg 240 chk_cnt_ave 5 (tenths)
adj_chk_cnt_ave 122 (tenths)
Check:if changes(21)xadj_cca(122) >= freq(48)x200
is 2562 >= 9600 ?
******** new mail returning -1 ********
STATUS cmd:2066, max:-1, min-1
cancel_busy_alarm(-1)
Read char returning: 2066 Down Arrow
Read command returning: 2066 Down Arrow
New_mail_count zeroed
@@@@ current:31
new mail called (0 2 1)
STATUS cmd:2066, max:-1, min-1
cancel_busy_alarm(-1)
Read char returning: 2066 Down Arrow
Read command returning: 2066 Down Arrow
New_mail_count zeroed
@@@@ current:31
new mail called (0 2 1)
STATUS cmd:2066, max:-1, min-1
cancel_busy_alarm(-1)
Read char returning: 2066 Down Arrow
Read command returning: 2066 Down Arrow
New_mail_count zeroed
@@@@ current:31
new mail called (0 2 1)
STATUS cmd:2066, max:-1, min-1
cancel_busy_alarm(-1)
Read char returning: 2066 Down Arrow
Read command returning: 2066 Down Arrow
New_mail_count zeroed
@@@@ current:31
new mail called (0 2 1)
STATUS cmd:2066, max:-1, min-1
cancel_busy_alarm(-1)
Read char returning: 2066 Down Arrow
Read command returning: 2066 Down Arrow
New_mail_count zeroed
@@@@ current:31
new mail called (0 2 1)
STATUS cmd:2066, max:-1, min-1
cancel_busy_alarm(-1)
Read char returning: 2066 Down Arrow
Read command returning: 2066 Down Arrow
New_mail_count zeroed
@@@@ current:31
new mail called (0 2 1)
STATUS cmd:2066, max:-1, min-1
cancel_busy_alarm(-1)
Read char returning: 2066 Down Arrow
Read command returning: 2066 Down Arrow
New_mail_count zeroed
@@@@ current:31
new mail called (0 2 1)
STATUS cmd:2066, max:-1, min-1
cancel_busy_alarm(-1)
Read char returning: 2066 Down Arrow
Read command returning: 2066 Down Arrow
New_mail_count zeroed
@@@@ current:31
new mail called (0 2 1)
STATUS cmd:2066, max:-1, min-1
cancel_busy_alarm(-1)
Read char returning: 2066 Down Arrow
Read command returning: 2066 Down Arrow
New_mail_count zeroed
@@@@ current:31
new mail called (0 2 1)
STATUS cmd:2066, max:-1, min-1
cancel_busy_alarm(-1)
Read char returning: 2066 Down Arrow
Read command returning: 2066 Down Arrow
New_mail_count zeroed
@@@@ current:31
new mail called (0 2 1)
STATUS cmd:2066, max:-1, min-1
cancel_busy_alarm(-1)
Read char returning: 2066 Down Arrow
Read command returning: 2066 Down Arrow
New_mail_count zeroed
@@@@ current:31
new mail called (0 2 1)
STATUS cmd:2066, max:-1, min-1
cancel_busy_alarm(-1)
Read char returning: 2066 Down Arrow
Read command returning: 2066 Down Arrow
New_mail_count zeroed
@@@@ current:31
new mail called (0 2 1)
STATUS cmd:2066, max:-1, min-1
cancel_busy_alarm(-1)
Read char returning: 2066 Down Arrow
Read command returning: 2066 Down Arrow
New_mail_count zeroed
@@@@ current:31
new mail called (0 2 1)
STATUS cmd:2066, max:-1, min-1
cancel_busy_alarm(-1)
Read char returning: 2066 Down Arrow
Read command returning: 2066 Down Arrow
New_mail_count zeroed
@@@@ current:31
new mail called (0 2 1)
STATUS cmd:2066, max:-1, min-1
cancel_busy_alarm(-1)
Read char returning: 2066 Down Arrow
Read command returning: 2066 Down Arrow
New_mail_count zeroed
@@@@ current:31
new mail called (0 2 1)
STATUS cmd:2066, max:-1, min-1
cancel_busy_alarm(-1)
Read char returning: 2066 Down Arrow
Read command returning: 2066 Down Arrow
New_mail_count zeroed
@@@@ current:31
new mail called (0 2 1)
STATUS cmd:2066, max:-1, min-1
cancel_busy_alarm(-1)
Read char returning: 2066 Down Arrow
Read command returning: 2066 Down Arrow
New_mail_count zeroed
@@@@ current:31
new mail called (0 2 1)
STATUS cmd:2066, max:-1, min-1
cancel_busy_alarm(-1)
Read char returning: 2066 Down Arrow
Read command returning: 2066 Down Arrow
New_mail_count zeroed
q_status_message(END of message)
@@@@ current:31
new mail called (0 2 1)
output_message(END of message)
STATUS cmd:2066, max:1, min0
cancel_busy_alarm(-1)
Read char returning: 2066 Down Arrow
Read command returning: 2066 Down Arrow
New_mail_count zeroed
q_status_message(Already at end of message)
@@@@ current:31
new mail called (0 2 1)
STATUS: diff:0, displayed: 971211890, now: 971211890
d_q_status_message(END of message)
output_message(Already at end of message)
STATUS cmd:2066, max:1, min0
cancel_busy_alarm(-1)
Read char returning: 2066 Down Arrow
Read command returning: 2066 Down Arrow
New_mail_count zeroed
@@@@ current:31
new mail called (0 2 1)
output_message(Already at end of message)
STATUS cmd:2066, max:1, min0
cancel_busy_alarm(-1)
Read char returning: 2066 Down Arrow
Read command returning: 2066 Down Arrow
New_mail_count zeroed
@@@@ current:31
new mail called (0 2 1)
output_message(Already at end of message)
STATUS cmd:2066, max:1, min0
cancel_busy_alarm(-1)
Read char returning: 2066 Down Arrow
Read command returning: 2066 Down Arrow
New_mail_count zeroed
@@@@ current:31
new mail called (0 2 1)
check_point(VeryBadTime)
freq 48 tm 1260 changes 21 since_1st_change 215
since_status_chg 640 chk_cnt_ave 5 (tenths)
adj_chk_cnt_ave 200 (tenths)
Check:if changes(21)xadj_cca(200) >= freq(48)x200
is 4200 >= 9600 ?
******** new mail returning -1 ********
output_message(Already at end of message)
STATUS cmd:2066, max:1, min0
cancel_busy_alarm(-1)
Read char returning: 2066 Down Arrow
Read command returning: 2066 Down Arrow
New_mail_count zeroed
@@@@ current:31
new mail called (0 2 1)
output_message(Already at end of message)
STATUS cmd:2066, max:1, min0
cancel_busy_alarm(-1)
Read char returning: 2066 Down Arrow
Read command returning: 2066 Down Arrow
New_mail_count zeroed
@@@@ current:31
new mail called (0 2 1)
output_message(Already at end of message)
STATUS cmd:2066, max:1, min0
cancel_busy_alarm(-1)
Read char returning: 2066 Down Arrow
Read command returning: 2066 Down Arrow
New_mail_count zeroed
@@@@ current:31
new mail called (0 2 1)
output_message(Already at end of message)
STATUS cmd:2066, max:1, min0
cancel_busy_alarm(-1)
Read char returning: 2065 Up Arrow
Read command returning: 2065 Up Arrow
New_mail_count zeroed
@@@@ current:31
new mail called (0 2 1)
STATUS: diff:-1, displayed: 971211925, now: 971211926
d_q_status_message(Already at end of message)
Clearing status line
STATUS cmd:2065, max:-1, min-1
cancel_busy_alarm(-1)
Read char returning: 2065 Up Arrow
Read command returning: 2065 Up Arrow
New_mail_count zeroed
@@@@ current:31
new mail called (0 2 1)
STATUS cmd:2065, max:-1, min-1
cancel_busy_alarm(-1)
Read char returning: 2065 Up Arrow
Read command returning: 2065 Up Arrow
New_mail_count zeroed
@@@@ current:31
new mail called (0 2 1)
STATUS cmd:2065, max:-1, min-1
cancel_busy_alarm(-1)
Read char returning: 2065 Up Arrow
Read command returning: 2065 Up Arrow
New_mail_count zeroed
@@@@ current:31
new mail called (0 2 1)
STATUS cmd:2065, max:-1, min-1
cancel_busy_alarm(-1)
Read char returning: 102 f
Read command returning: 102 f
New_mail_count zeroed

- process_cmd((706)�) -

- forward -
checking subject: "mensagem do Pedro"
open_patterns()
get_signature(/users/abel/.signature)
-- gf_reset local_nvtnl
-- gf_reset wrap
-- gf_reset nvtnl_local
-- gf_pipe: done.
busy_alarm(1, Busy, 00000000, 0)
busy_alarm(1, Busy, 00000000, 0)
-- gf_reset nvtnl_local
-- gf_pipe: done.
cancel_busy_alarm(-1)

=== send called ===
set_titlebar - style: 1 current message cnt:1 current_pl: 0 total_pl: 0
comatose(1473) returns:"1,473"
flags: 80000040
cancel_busy_alarm(-1)

---- COMPOSER ----
fix_windsize()
new win size -----<24 80>------
Clearing status line
STATUS cmd:24, max:-1, min-1
New_mail_count zeroed
new mail called (0 2 3)
New_mail_count zeroed
New_mail_count zeroed
New_mail_count zeroed
New_mail_count zeroed
New_mail_count zeroed
New_mail_count zeroed
New_mail_count zeroed
New_mail_count zeroed
New_mail_count zeroed
New_mail_count zeroed
New_mail_count zeroed
New_mail_count zeroed
New_mail_count zeroed
New_mail_count zeroed
New_mail_count zeroed
New_mail_count zeroed
- build_address - ([email protected])
- adrbk_check_and_fix_all -
- adrbk_check_and_fix(/users/abel/.addressbook) -
- adrbk_check_validity(/users/abel/.addressbook) -
- adrbk_check_local_validity(/users/abel/.addressbook) -
- build_address_internal - ([email protected])
- init_ab_if_needed -
- save_state -
- expand_address - ([email protected])
- init_abook -
addrbook nickname = .addressbook filename = /users/abel/.addressbook ostatus was Closed, want NoDisplay
- adrbk_check_and_fix(/users/abel/.addressbook) -
- adrbk_check_validity(/users/abel/.addressbook) -
- adrbk_check_local_validity(/users/abel/.addressbook) -
- adrbk_lookup_by_addr([email protected]) (in /users/abel/.addressbook) -
- restore_state -
- init_disp_form(.addressbook) -
- init_abook -
addrbook nickname = .addressbook filename = /users/abel/.addressbook ostatus was NoDisplay, want Closed
- adrbk_partial_close(/users/abel/.addressbook) -
- init_entryref_cache -
- clear_entryref_cache -
- warp_to_dlc(0) -
New_mail_count zeroed
- build_address - ()
New_mail_count zeroed
New_mail_count zeroed
New_mail_count zeroed
New_mail_count zeroed
New_mail_count zeroed
New_mail_count zeroed
New_mail_count zeroed
New_mail_count zeroed
New_mail_count zeroed
New_mail_count zeroed
New_mail_count zeroed
New_mail_count zeroed
New_mail_count zeroed
New_mail_count zeroed
New_mail_count zeroed
New_mail_count zeroed
New_mail_count zeroed
New_mail_count zeroed
New_mail_count zeroed
New_mail_count zeroed
New_mail_count zeroed
New_mail_count zeroed
New_mail_count zeroed
New_mail_count zeroed
New_mail_count zeroed
New_mail_count zeroed
new mail called (0 2 3)
check_point(VeryBadTime)
freq 48 tm 1260 changes 21 since_1st_change 377
since_status_chg 2260 chk_cnt_ave 5 (tenths)
adj_chk_cnt_ave 200 (tenths)
Check:if changes(21)xadj_cca(200) >= freq(48)x200
is 4200 >= 9600 ?
Mail_Ping(mail_stream): Tue Oct 10 18:08:07 2000

New mail checked
Done with IMAP critical on /var/mail/abel
=== mm_exists(1474,/var/mail/abel) called ===
Done with IMAP critical on /var/mail/abel
Ping complete: Tue Oct 10 18:08:07 2000

New mail, inbox, new_mail_count:1 expunge count:0, max_msgno:1474
q_status_message(New mail! From Abel L. Packer with regar)
******** new mail returning 1 ********
fix_windsize()
new win size -----<24 80>------
output_message(New mail! From Abel L. Packer with regard to [Gerentes-l] Re: [Gerentes-l] RE: [Gerentes-l] Re: sugestao)
STATUS cmd:32, max:60, min0
New_mail_count zeroed
fix_windsize()
new win size -----<24 80>------
suspend_busy_alarm
d_q_status_message(New mail! From Abel L. Packer with regar)
0 ? Help 1
1 ^C Cancel 0
2 Y [Yes] 13
3 N No 13
4 (null) (null) 26
5 (null) (null) 26
6 (null) (null) 40
7 (null) (null) 40
8 (null) (null) 53
9 (null) (null) 53
10 (null) (null) 66
11 (null) (null) 66
row: -2, real_row: 22, column: 0
Read char returning: 121 y
Want_to read: y (121)
resume_busy_alarm
.. composer returns (0x5)
fix_windsize()
new win size -----<24 80>------
init_signals()
busy_alarm(1, Busy, 00000000, 0)
busy_alarm(1, Busy, 00000000, 0)
busy_alarm(1, Busy, 00000000, 0)
-- pine_encode_body: 0
cancel_busy_alarm(-1)
=== sending: build_folder_list: mail/%s sent-mail
busy_alarm(1, Busy, 00000000, 0)
mm_list "mail/sent-mail": delim: '/', , no inferiors, marked
cancel_busy_alarm(-1)
Sending mail...
busy_alarm(1, Sending mail, 4002ae4a, 1)
q_status_message(Sending mail | |)
output_message(Sending mail | |)
STATUS cmd:120, max:1, min0
call_mailer: via "/usr/sbin/sendmail -bs -odb -oem"
Opening pipe: "/usr/sbin/sendmail -bs -odb -oem" (WRNP)
PID: 21965, COMMAND: /usr/sbin/sendmail -bs -odb -oem
IMAP DEBUG 18:08:48 10/10: 220 brm.bireme.br ESMTP Sendmail 8.9.3/8.9.3; Tue, 10 Oct 2000 18:08:48 -0300 (SAT)
IMAP DEBUG 18:08:48 10/10: EHLO localhost
IMAP DEBUG 18:08:48 10/10: 250-brm.bireme.br Hello abel@localhost, pleased to meet you
IMAP DEBUG 18:08:48 10/10: 250-EXPN
IMAP DEBUG 18:08:48 10/10: 250-VERB
IMAP DEBUG 18:08:48 10/10: 250-8BITMIME
IMAP DEBUG 18:08:48 10/10: 250-SIZE
IMAP DEBUG 18:08:48 10/10: 250-DSN
IMAP DEBUG 18:08:48 10/10: 250-ONEX
IMAP DEBUG 18:08:48 10/10: 250-ETRN
IMAP DEBUG 18:08:48 10/10: 250-XUSR
IMAP DEBUG 18:08:48 10/10: 250 HELP
Opened SMTP server "brm.bireme.br"
IMAP DEBUG 18:08:48 10/10: RSET
IMAP DEBUG 18:08:48 10/10: 250 Reset state
IMAP DEBUG 18:08:48 10/10: MAIL FROM:<[email protected]>
IMAP DEBUG 18:08:48 10/10: 250 <[email protected]>... Sender ok
IMAP DEBUG 18:08:48 10/10: RCPT TO:<[email protected]>
IMAP DEBUG 18:08:48 10/10: 250 <[email protected]>... Recipient ok
IMAP DEBUG 18:08:48 10/10: DATA
IMAP DEBUG 18:08:48 10/10: 354 Enter mail, end with "." on a line by itself
-- pine_rfc822_output
busy_alarm(1, Busy, 00000000, 0)
-- pine_encode_body: 0
-- pine_rfc822_output_body: 0
-- pine_rfc822_output_body: segment 1836 bytes
-- gf_reset local_nvtnl
-- gf_pipe: done.
IMAP DEBUG 18:08:48 10/10: .
IMAP DEBUG 18:08:49 10/10: 250 SAA21966 Message accepted for delivery
IMAP DEBUG 18:08:49 10/10: QUIT
SIGCHLD raised
IMAP DEBUG 18:08:49 10/10: 221 brm.bireme.br closing connection
cancel_busy_alarm(0)
q_status_message(Sending mail | 100% |)
Writing Fcc
busy_alarm(1, Writing Fcc, 00000000, 1)
q_status_message(Writing Fcc )
STATUS: diff:-1, displayed: 971212128, now: 971212129
d_q_status_message(Sending mail | |)
d_q_status_message(Sending mail | 100% |)
output_message(Writing Fcc )
STATUS cmd:120, max:1, min0
same_stream: mail/sent-mail == /var/mail/abel
same_stream: no dice
Done with IMAP critical on
Done with IMAP critical on
cancel_busy_alarm(0)
q_status_message(Writing Fcc DONE)
done.
q_status_message(Message sent and copied to "sent-mail".)
=== send returning ===
PROCESS_CMD return: 0
@@@@ current:31
set_titlebar - style: 3 current message cnt:1 current_pl: 47 total_pl: 51
comatose(31) returns:"31"
comatose(1474) returns:"1,474"
0 ? Help 0
1 O OTHER CMDS 0
2 < MsgIndex 13
3 > ViewAttch 13
4 P PrevMsg 26
5 N NextMsg 26
6 - PrevPage 42
7 Spc NextPage 40
8 D Delete 53
9 U Undelete 53
10 R Reply 66
11 F Forward 66
row: -2, real_row: 22, column: 0
new mail called (0 2 1)
check_point(VeryBadTime)
freq 48 tm 1260 changes 21 since_1st_change 419
since_status_chg 2680 chk_cnt_ave 5 (tenths)
adj_chk_cnt_ave 200 (tenths)
Check:if changes(21)xadj_cca(200) >= freq(48)x200
is 4200 >= 9600 ?
Mail_Ping(mail_stream): Tue Oct 10 18:08:49 2000

New mail checked
Ping complete: Tue Oct 10 18:08:49 2000

New mail, inbox, new_mail_count:0 expunge count:0, max_msgno:1474
Sorting by Arrival/reverse
******** new mail returning -1 ********
STATUS: diff:0, displayed: 971212129, now: 971212129
d_q_status_message(Writing Fcc )
d_q_status_message(Writing Fcc DONE)
output_message(Message sent and copied to "sent-mail".)
STATUS cmd:102, max:3, min0
cancel_busy_alarm(-1)
Read char returning: 105 i
Read command returning: 105 i
New_mail_count zeroed

- process_cmd((504)�) -
PROCESS_CMD return: 0
cancel_busy_alarm(-1)

---- MAIL INDEX ----

---- INDEX MANAGER ----
new mail called (0 2 1)
set_titlebar - style: 2 current message cnt:1 current_pl: 0 total_pl: 0
comatose(32) returns:"32"
comatose(1474) returns:"1,474"
=== setup_header_widths(1474) ===
=== format_index_line(20,1455) ===
=== setup_header_widths(1474) ===
Parse date: "Tue, 10 Oct 2000 15:40:36 -0300" to.. hours_off_gmt:-3 min_off_gmt:0
Parse date: wkday:2 month:10 year:2000 day:10 hour:15 min:40 sec:36
comatose(2323) returns:"2,323"
INDEX(40079db8) -->+ N 20 Oct 10 Lewis Joel Greene (2,323) Processo 00/0787-0 <-- (80), 66507400>
=== format_index_line(21,1454) ===
Parse date: "Tue, 10 Oct 2000 14:07:33 -0300" to.. hours_off_gmt:-3 min_off_gmt:0
Parse date: wkday:2 month:10 year:2000 day:10 hour:14 min:7 sec:33
comatose(143) returns:"143"
INDEX(40079e10) -->+ N 21 Oct 10 #BIR:DIR (143K) FW: Agreement with Middlesex Univers<-- (80), 189881735>
=== format_index_line(22,1453) ===
Parse date: "Tue, 10 Oct 2000 13:31:56 -0300 (SAT)" to.. hours_off_gmt:-3 min_off_gmt:0
Parse date: wkday:2 month:10 year:2000 day:10 hour:13 min:31 sec:56
comatose(621) returns:"621"
INDEX(40079e68) -->+ 22 Oct 10 Roberto Souto Pere (621) aditivo para fapesp <-- (80), 20846604>
=== format_index_line(23,1452) ===
Parse date: "Tue, 10 Oct 2000 11:19:41 -0300" to.. hours_off_gmt:-3 min_off_gmt:0
Parse date: wkday:2 month:10 year:2000 day:10 hour:11 min:19 sec:41
comatose(4355) returns:"4,355"
INDEX(40079ec0) --> N 23 Oct 10 Reforme (4,355) V Cong.CLAD: Intervencion Panel 11 <-- (80), 135627454>
=== format_index_line(24,1451) ===
Parse date: "Tue, 10 Oct 2000 14:29:18 -0200 (BRDT)" to.. hours_off_gmt:-2 min_off_gmt:0
Parse date: wkday:2 month:10 year:2000 day:10 hour:14 min:29 sec:18
comatose(2464) returns:"2,464"
INDEX(40079f18) --> N 24 Oct 10 Hernani Luiz Vila (2,464) Apresenta��o e d�vida <-- (80), 231703739>
=== format_index_line(25,1450) ===
Parse date: "Tue, 10 Oct 2000 13:40:42 +0100" to.. hours_off_gmt:1 min_off_gmt:0
Parse date: wkday:2 month:10 year:2000 day:10 hour:13 min:40 sec:42
comatose(2152) returns:"2,152"
INDEX(40079f70) -->+ 25 Oct 10 Dora Pratt (2,152) noticias <-- (80), 252630691>
=== format_index_line(26,1449) ===
Parse date: "Tue, 10 Oct 2000 09:43:24 -0600" to.. hours_off_gmt:-6 min_off_gmt:0
Parse date: wkday:2 month:10 year:2000 day:10 hour:9 min:43 sec:24
comatose(3994) returns:"3,994"
INDEX(40079fc8) -->+ D 26 Oct 10 Polo, Maria del Ro (3,994) Nuevo bebe!!! <-- (80), 196105735>
=== format_index_line(27,1448) ===
Parse date: "Tue, 10 Oct 2000 11:32:02 -0400" to.. hours_off_gmt:-4 min_off_gmt:0
Parse date: wkday:2 month:10 year:2000 day:10 hour:11 min:32 sec:2
comatose(5231) returns:"5,231"
INDEX(4007a020) --> D 27 Oct 10 Jana Bradley (5,231) Travel Award to ALA in San Francisco<-- (80), 164004635>
=== format_index_line(28,1447) ===
Parse date: "Tue, 10 Oct 2000 11:16:46 -0400" to.. hours_off_gmt:-4 min_off_gmt:0
Parse date: wkday:2 month:10 year:2000 day:10 hour:11 min:16 sec:46
comatose(7518) returns:"7,518"
INDEX(4007a078) --> D 28 Oct 10 Roberta Segreti (7,518) Fwd: ALA San Francisco Student Trave<-- (80), 81677285>
=== format_index_line(29,1446) ===
Parse date: "Tue, 10 Oct 2000 12:07:35 -0300" to.. hours_off_gmt:-3 min_off_gmt:0
Parse date: wkday:2 month:10 year:2000 day:10 hour:12 min:7 sec:35
comatose(4746) returns:"4,746"
INDEX(4007a0d0) -->+ D 29 Oct 10 Oliveira, Cristian (4,746) RE: Consultora Legislacao - Alimento<-- (80), 21551069>
=== format_index_line(30,1445) ===
Parse date: "Tue, 10 Oct 2000 11:41:27 -0300 (SAT)" to.. hours_off_gmt:-3 min_off_gmt:0
Parse date: wkday:2 month:10 year:2000 day:10 hour:11 min:41 sec:27
comatose(1695) returns:"1,695"
INDEX(4007a128) -->+ D 30 Oct 10 Ana Maria C. Arauj (1,695) Re: sugestao <-- (80), 103862635>
=== format_index_line(31,1444) ===
Parse date: "Tue, 10 Oct 2000 11:56:23 -0300" to.. hours_off_gmt:-3 min_off_gmt:0
Parse date: wkday:2 month:10 year:2000 day:10 hour:11 min:56 sec:23
comatose(3738) returns:"3,738"
INDEX(4007a180) --> D 31 Oct 10 Taruhn, Rosane (BI (3,738) [Gerentes-l] RE: [Gerentes-l] Re: su<-- (80), 104713930>
=== format_index_line(32,1443) ===
Parse date: "Tue, 10 Oct 2000 11:37:06 -0300" to.. hours_off_gmt:-3 min_off_gmt:0
Parse date: wkday:2 month:10 year:2000 day:10 hour:11 min:37 sec:6
comatose(2050) returns:"2,050"
INDEX(4007a1d8) -->+ 32 Oct 10 Castro, Elenice de (2,050) mensagem do Pedro <-- (80), 127876677>
=== format_index_line(33,1442) ===
Parse date: "Tue, 10 Oct 2000 06:49:39 -0700 (PDT)" to.. hours_off_gmt:-7 min_off_gmt:0
Parse date: wkday:2 month:10 year:2000 day:10 hour:6 min:49 sec:39
comatose(8003) returns:"8,003"
INDEX(4007a230) -->+ N 33 Oct 10 Pedro Urra (8,003) Fwd: Returned mail: Can't create out<-- (80), 224804887>
=== format_index_line(34,1441) ===
Parse date: "Tue, 10 Oct 2000 10:33:52 -0300 (SAT)" to.. hours_off_gmt:-3 min_off_gmt:0
Parse date: wkday:2 month:10 year:2000 day:10 hour:10 min:33 sec:52
comatose(860) returns:"860"
INDEX(4007a288) -->+ N 34 Oct 10 To: Abel L. Packer (860) Direccion de correo (fwd) <-- (80), 197679747>
=== format_index_line(35,1440) ===
Parse date: "Tue, 10 Oct 2000 10:31:32 -0300 (SAT)" to.. hours_off_gmt:-3 min_off_gmt:0
Parse date: wkday:2 month:10 year:2000 day:10 hour:10 min:31 sec:32
comatose(2378) returns:"2,378"
INDEX(4007a2e0) --> N 35 Oct 10 To: Ana Maria C. A (2,378) [Gerentes-l] Re: sugestao <-- (80), 262852306>
=== format_index_line(36,1439) ===
Parse date: "Tue, 10 Oct 2000 10:48:12 -0300" to.. hours_off_gmt:-3 min_off_gmt:0
Parse date: wkday:2 month:10 year:2000 day:10 hour:10 min:48 sec:12
comatose(3737) returns:"3,737"
INDEX(4007a338) -->+ N 36 Oct 10 #BIR:DIR (3,737) FW: Boletim Peri�dico Empresa - Ano <-- (80), 83007874>
=== format_index_line(37,1438) ===
Parse date: "Tue, 10 Oct 2000 09:16:08 EDT" to.. hours_off_gmt:-4 min_off_gmt:0
Parse date: wkday:2 month:10 year:2000 day:10 hour:9 min:16 sec:8
comatose(2563) returns:"2,563"
INDEX(4007a390) --> N 37 Oct 10 [email protected] (2,563) (no subject) <-- (80), 243080536>
=== format_index_line(38,1437) ===
Parse date: "Tue, 10 Oct 2000 11:01:38 -0300" to.. hours_off_gmt:-3 min_off_gmt:0
Parse date: wkday:2 month:10 year:2000 day:10 hour:11 min:1 sec:38
comatose(1538) returns:"1,538"
INDEX(4007a3e8) -->+ N 38 Oct 10 Marcia Ymanaka Bar (1,538) [Fwd: Re: Fw: Listserver for the Fri<-- (80), 43994859>
0 ? Help 0
1 O OTHER CMDS 0
2 < FldrList 13
3 > [ViewMsg] 13
4 P PrevMsg 26
5 N NextMsg 26
6 - PrevPage 42
7 Spc NextPage 40
8 D Delete 53
9 U Undelete 53
10 R Reply 66
11 F Forward 66
row: -2, real_row: 22, column: 0
STATUS: diff:-1, displayed: 971212129, now: 971212130
d_q_status_message(Message sent and copied to "sent-mail".)
Clearing status line
STATUS cmd:120, max:-1, min-1
cancel_busy_alarm(-1)
Read char returning: 115 s
Read command returning: 115 s
New_mail_count zeroed

- process_cmd((714)�) -

- saving message -
=== optionally_enter called ===
string:"" y:0 x:-3 length: 1024 append: 1
passwd:0 prompt:"SAVE Msg #32 to folder [saved-Oct-98] : " label:"To Fldrs"
suspend_busy_alarm
0 ^G Help 0
1 ^C Cancel 0
2 ^T To Fldrs 14
3 Ret Accept 13
4 (null) (null) 26
5 (null) (null) 26
6 (null) (null) 40
7 (null) (null) 40
8 (null) (null) 53
9 (null) (null) 53
10 (null) (null) 66
11 (null) (null) 66
row: -2, real_row: 22, column: 0
Read char returning: 99 c
Read char returning: 114 r
Read char returning: 105 i
Read char returning: 99 c
Read char returning: 115 s
Read char returning: 51 3
Read char returning: 8 ^H
Read char returning: 52 4
Read char returning: 8 ^H
Read char returning: 53 5
Read char returning: 13 RETURN
resume_busy_alarm
same_stream: mail/crics5 == /var/mail/abel
same_stream: no dice
busy_alarm(1, Busy, 00000000, 0)
mm_list "mail/crics5": delim: '/', , no inferiors, marked
cancel_busy_alarm(-1)
busy_alarm(1, Busy, 00000000, 0)
same_stream: mail/crics5 == /var/mail/abel
same_stream: no dice
same_stream: mail/crics5 == /var/mail/abel
same_stream: no dice
Done with IMAP critical on
Done with IMAP critical on
cancel_busy_alarm(0)
q_status_message(Message 32 copied to folder "crics5" and)
new mail called (0 2 1)
set_titlebar - style: 2 current message cnt:1 current_pl: 0 total_pl: 0
comatose(32) returns:"32"
comatose(1474) returns:"1,474"
Hit: Returning 40079db8 -> <+ N 20 Oct 10 Lewis Joel Greene (2,323) Processo 00/0787-0 (80), 66507400>
Hit: Returning 40079e10 -> <+ N 21 Oct 10 #BIR:DIR (143K) FW: Agreement with Middlesex Univers (80), 189881735>
Hit: Returning 40079e68 -> <+ 22 Oct 10 Roberto Souto Pere (621) aditivo para fapesp (80), 20846604>
Hit: Returning 40079ec0 -> < N 23 Oct 10 Reforme (4,355) V Cong.CLAD: Intervencion Panel 11 (80), 135627454>
Hit: Returning 40079f18 -> < N 24 Oct 10 Hernani Luiz Vila (2,464) Apresenta��o e d�vida (80), 231703739>
Hit: Returning 40079f70 -> <+ 25 Oct 10 Dora Pratt (2,152) noticias (80), 252630691>
Hit: Returning 40079fc8 -> <+ D 26 Oct 10 Polo, Maria del Ro (3,994) Nuevo bebe!!! (80), 196105735>
Hit: Returning 4007a020 -> < D 27 Oct 10 Jana Bradley (5,231) Travel Award to ALA in San Francisco (80), 164004635>
Hit: Returning 4007a078 -> < D 28 Oct 10 Roberta Segreti (7,518) Fwd: ALA San Francisco Student Trave (80), 81677285>
Hit: Returning 4007a0d0 -> <+ D 29 Oct 10 Oliveira, Cristian (4,746) RE: Consultora Legislacao - Alimento (80), 21551069>
Hit: Returning 4007a128 -> <+ D 30 Oct 10 Ana Maria C. Arauj (1,695) Re: sugestao (80), 103862635>
Hit: Returning 4007a180 -> < D 31 Oct 10 Taruhn, Rosane (BI (3,738) [Gerentes-l] RE: [Gerentes-l] Re: su (80), 104713930>
=== format_index_line(32,1443) ===
Parse date: "Tue, 10 Oct 2000 11:37:06 -0300" to.. hours_off_gmt:-3 min_off_gmt:0
Parse date: wkday:2 month:10 year:2000 day:10 hour:11 min:37 sec:6
comatose(2050) returns:"2,050"
INDEX(4007a1d8) -->+ D 32 Oct 10 Castro, Elenice de (2,050) mensagem do Pedro <-- (80), 127876713>
Hit: Returning 4007a230 -> <+ N 33 Oct 10 Pedro Urra (8,003) Fwd: Returned mail: Can't create out (80), 224804887>
Hit: Returning 4007a288 -> <+ N 34 Oct 10 To: Abel L. Packer (860) Direccion de correo (fwd) (80), 197679747>
Hit: Returning 4007a2e0 -> < N 35 Oct 10 To: Ana Maria C. A (2,378) [Gerentes-l] Re: sugestao (80), 262852306>
Hit: Returning 4007a338 -> <+ N 36 Oct 10 #BIR:DIR (3,737) FW: Boletim Peri�dico Empresa - Ano (80), 83007874>
Hit: Returning 4007a390 -> < N 37 Oct 10 [email protected] (2,563) (no subject) (80), 243080536>
Hit: Returning 4007a3e8 -> <+ N 38 Oct 10 Marcia Ymanaka Bar (1,538) [Fwd: Re: Fw: Listserver for the Fri (80), 43994859>
0 ? Help 0
1 O OTHER CMDS 0
2 < FldrList 13
3 > [ViewMsg] 13
4 P PrevMsg 26
5 N NextMsg 26
6 - PrevPage 42
7 Spc NextPage 40
8 D Delete 53
9 U Undelete 53
10 R Reply 66
11 F Forward 66
row: -2, real_row: 22, column: 0
output_message(Message 32 copied to folder "crics5" and deleted)
STATUS cmd:115, max:3, min0
cancel_busy_alarm(-1)
Read char returning: 2066 Down Arrow
Read command returning: 2066 Down Arrow
New_mail_count zeroed

- process_cmd((700)�) -
new mail called (0 2 1)
comatose(33) returns:"33"
Hit: Returning 40079db8 -> <+ N 20 Oct 10 Lewis Joel Greene (2,323) Processo 00/0787-0 (80), 66507400>
Hit: Returning 40079e10 -> <+ N 21 Oct 10 #BIR:DIR (143K) FW: Agreement with Middlesex Univers (80), 189881735>
Hit: Returning 40079e68 -> <+ 22 Oct 10 Roberto Souto Pere (621) aditivo para fapesp (80), 20846604>
Hit: Returning 40079ec0 -> < N 23 Oct 10 Reforme (4,355) V Cong.CLAD: Intervencion Panel 11 (80), 135627454>
Hit: Returning 40079f18 -> < N 24 Oct 10 Hernani Luiz Vila (2,464) Apresenta��o e d�vida (80), 231703739>
Hit: Returning 40079f70 -> <+ 25 Oct 10 Dora Pratt (2,152) noticias (80), 252630691>
Hit: Returning 40079fc8 -> <+ D 26 Oct 10 Polo, Maria del Ro (3,994) Nuevo bebe!!! (80), 196105735>
Hit: Returning 4007a020 -> < D 27 Oct 10 Jana Bradley (5,231) Travel Award to ALA in San Francisco (80), 164004635>
Hit: Returning 4007a078 -> < D 28 Oct 10 Roberta Segreti (7,518) Fwd: ALA San Francisco Student Trave (80), 81677285>
Hit: Returning 4007a0d0 -> <+ D 29 Oct 10 Oliveira, Cristian (4,746) RE: Consultora Legislacao - Alimento (80), 21551069>
Hit: Returning 4007a128 -> <+ D 30 Oct 10 Ana Maria C. Arauj (1,695) Re: sugestao (80), 103862635>
Hit: Returning 4007a180 -> < D 31 Oct 10 Taruhn, Rosane (BI (3,738) [Gerentes-l] RE: [Gerentes-l] Re: su (80), 104713930>
Hit: Returning 4007a1d8 -> <+ D 32 Oct 10 Castro, Elenice de (2,050) mensagem do Pedro (80), 127876713>
Hit: Returning 4007a230 -> <+ N 33 Oct 10 Pedro Urra (8,003) Fwd: Returned mail: Can't create out (80), 224804887>
Hit: Returning 4007a288 -> <+ N 34 Oct 10 To: Abel L. Packer (860) Direccion de correo (fwd) (80), 197679747>
Hit: Returning 4007a2e0 -> < N 35 Oct 10 To: Ana Maria C. A (2,378) [Gerentes-l] Re: sugestao (80), 262852306>
Hit: Returning 4007a338 -> <+ N 36 Oct 10 #BIR:DIR (3,737) FW: Boletim Peri�dico Empresa - Ano (80), 83007874>
Hit: Returning 4007a390 -> < N 37 Oct 10 [email protected] (2,563) (no subject) (80), 243080536>
Hit: Returning 4007a3e8 -> <+ N 38 Oct 10 Marcia Ymanaka Bar (1,538) [Fwd: Re: Fw: Listserver for the Fri (80), 43994859>
STATUS: diff:-1, displayed: 971212135, now: 971212136
d_q_status_message(Message 32 copied to folder "crics5" and)
Clearing status line
STATUS cmd:2066, max:-1, min-1
cancel_busy_alarm(-1)
Read char returning: 13 RETURN
Read command returning: 13 RETURN
New_mail_count zeroed

- process_cmd((505)�) -

----- MAIL VIEW -----
busy_alarm(1, Busy, 00000000, 0)
-- gf_reset local_nvtnl
-- gf_reset wrap
-- gf_reset nvtnl_local
-- gf_pipe: suspend_busy_alarm
resume_busy_alarm
suspend_busy_alarm
resume_busy_alarm
suspend_busy_alarm
resume_busy_alarm
suspend_busy_alarm
resume_busy_alarm
done.
- mailcap_can_display -
- mc_get_command(Multipart/MIXED) -
- mc_init -
mailcap: path: /users/abel/.mailcap:/etc/mailcap:/usr/etc/mailcap:/usr/local/etc/mailcap
mailcap: process_file: /users/abel/.mailcap
mailcap: processing file: /users/abel/.mailcap
mailcap: /users/abel/.mailcap doesn't exist
mailcap: process_file: /etc/mailcap
mailcap: processing file: /etc/mailcap
mailcap: /etc/mailcap doesn't exist
mailcap: process_file: /usr/etc/mailcap
mailcap: processing file: /usr/etc/mailcap
mailcap: /usr/etc/mailcap doesn't exist
mailcap: process_file: /usr/local/etc/mailcap
mailcap: processing file: /usr/local/etc/mailcap
mailcap: /usr/local/etc/mailcap doesn't exist
comatose(9) returns:"9"
- mailcap_can_display -
- mc_get_command(Message/RFC822) -
- mc_init -
mailcap: path: /users/abel/.mailcap:/etc/mailcap:/usr/etc/mailcap:/usr/local/etc/mailcap
mailcap: process_file: /users/abel/.mailcap
mailcap: processing file: /users/abel/.mailcap
mailcap: /users/abel/.mailcap doesn't exist
mailcap: process_file: /etc/mailcap
mailcap: processing file: /etc/mailcap
mailcap: /etc/mailcap doesn't exist
mailcap: process_file: /usr/etc/mailcap
mailcap: processing file: /usr/etc/mailcap
mailcap: /usr/etc/mailcap doesn't exist
mailcap: process_file: /usr/local/etc/mailcap
mailcap: processing file: /usr/local/etc/mailcap
mailcap: /usr/local/etc/mailcap doesn't exist
- mailcap_can_display -
- mc_get_command(Multipart/REPORT) -
- mc_init -
mailcap: path: /users/abel/.mailcap:/etc/mailcap:/usr/etc/mailcap:/usr/local/etc/mailcap
mailcap: process_file: /users/abel/.mailcap
mailcap: processing file: /users/abel/.mailcap
mailcap: /users/abel/.mailcap doesn't exist
mailcap: process_file: /etc/mailcap
mailcap: processing file: /etc/mailcap
mailcap: /etc/mailcap doesn't exist
mailcap: process_file: /usr/etc/mailcap
mailcap: processing file: /usr/etc/mailcap
mailcap: /usr/etc/mailcap doesn't exist
mailcap: process_file: /usr/local/etc/mailcap
mailcap: processing file: /usr/local/etc/mailcap
mailcap: /usr/local/etc/mailcap doesn't exist
comatose(10) returns:"10"
- mailcap_can_display -
- mc_get_command(Message/DELIVERY-STATUS) -
- mc_init -
mailcap: path: /users/abel/.mailcap:/etc/mailcap:/usr/etc/mailcap:/usr/local/etc/mailcap
mailcap: process_file: /users/abel/.mailcap
mailcap: processing file: /users/abel/.mailcap
mailcap: /users/abel/.mailcap doesn't exist
mailcap: process_file: /etc/mailcap
mailcap: processing file: /etc/mailcap
mailcap: /etc/mailcap doesn't exist
mailcap: process_file: /usr/etc/mailcap
mailcap: processing file: /usr/etc/mailcap
mailcap: /usr/etc/mailcap doesn't exist
mailcap: process_file: /usr/local/etc/mailcap
mailcap: processing file: /usr/local/etc/mailcap
mailcap: /usr/local/etc/mailcap doesn't exist
- mailcap_can_display -
- mc_get_command(Message/RFC822) -
- mc_init -
mailcap: path: /users/abel/.mailcap:/etc/mailcap:/usr/etc/mailcap:/usr/local/etc/mailcap
mailcap: process_file: /users/abel/.mailcap
mailcap: processing file: /users/abel/.mailcap
mailcap: /users/abel/.mailcap doesn't exist
mailcap: process_file: /etc/mailcap
mailcap: processing file: /etc/mailcap
mailcap: /etc/mailcap doesn't exist
mailcap: process_file: /usr/etc/mailcap
mailcap: processing file: /usr/etc/mailcap
mailcap: /usr/etc/mailcap doesn't exist
mailcap: process_file: /usr/local/etc/mailcap
mailcap: processing file: /usr/local/etc/mailcap
mailcap: /usr/local/etc/mailcap doesn't exist
comatose(147) returns:"147"
suspend_busy_alarm
resume_busy_alarm
suspend_busy_alarm
resume_busy_alarm
suspend_busy_alarm
resume_busy_alarm
suspend_busy_alarm
resume_busy_alarm
suspend_busy_alarm
resume_busy_alarm
suspend_busy_alarm
resume_busy_alarm
suspend_busy_alarm
resume_busy_alarm
suspend_busy_alarm
resume_busy_alarm
suspend_busy_alarm
resume_busy_alarm
busy_alarm(1, Busy, 00000000, 0)
-- gf_reset escape
-- gf_reset wrap
-- gf_reset nvtnl_local
-- gf_pipe: suspend_busy_alarm
resume_busy_alarm
suspend_busy_alarm
resume_busy_alarm
suspend_busy_alarm
resume_busy_alarm
suspend_busy_alarm
resume_busy_alarm
suspend_busy_alarm
resume_busy_alarm
suspend_busy_alarm
resume_busy_alarm
done.
-- gf_reset escape
-- gf_reset wrap
-- gf_reset line_test
-- gf_pipe: done.
-- gf_reset local_nvtnl
-- gf_reset wrap
-- gf_reset nvtnl_local
-- gf_pipe: done.
busy_alarm(1, Busy, 00000000, 0)
-- gf_reset escape
-- gf_reset wrap
-- gf_reset nvtnl_local
-- gf_pipe: done.
-- gf_reset escape
-- gf_reset wrap
-- gf_reset line_test
-- gf_pipe: done.
busy_alarm(1, Busy, 00000000, 0)
-- gf_reset escape
-- gf_reset wrap
-- gf_reset nvtnl_local
-- gf_pipe: done.
-- gf_reset escape
-- gf_reset wrap
-- gf_reset line_test
-- gf_pipe: done.
-- gf_reset local_nvtnl
-- gf_reset wrap
-- gf_reset nvtnl_local
-- gf_pipe: done.
busy_alarm(1, Busy, 00000000, 0)
-- gf_reset escape
-- gf_reset wrap
-- gf_reset nvtnl_local
-- gf_pipe: done.
cancel_busy_alarm(-1)
@@@@ current:33
set_titlebar - style: 3 current message cnt:1 current_pl: 19 total_pl: 207
comatose(33) returns:"33"
comatose(1474) returns:"1,474"
0 ? Help 0
1 O OTHER CMDS 0
2 < MsgIndex 13
3 > ViewAttch 13
4 P PrevMsg 26
5 N NextMsg 26
6 - PrevPage 42
7 Spc NextPage 40
8 D Delete 53
9 U Undelete 53
10 R Reply 66
11 F Forward 66
row: -2, real_row: 22, column: 0
new mail called (0 0 1)
- adrbk_maintenance -
check_point(GoodTime)
freq 12 tm 420 changes 25 since_1st_change 426
since_status_chg 0 chk_cnt_ave 5 (tenths)
adj_chk_cnt_ave 5 (tenths)
Check:if changes(25)xadj_cca(5) >= freq(12)x200
is 125 >= 2400 ?
Doing checkpoint: Tue Oct 10 18:08:56 2000
Since 1st status change: 426
Done with IMAP critical on /var/mail/abel
=== mm_exists(1474,/var/mail/abel) called ===
IMAP 18:10:16 10/10 mm_log babble: Checkpoint completed
Done with IMAP critical on /var/mail/abel
Checkpoint complete: Tue Oct 10 18:10:16 2000

******** new mail returning -1 ********
Clearing status line
STATUS cmd:120, max:-1, min-1
cancel_busy_alarm(-1)
Read char returning: 2066 Down Arrow
Read command returning: 2066 Down Arrow
New_mail_count zeroed
@@@@ current:33
new mail called (0 2 1)
check_point(VeryBadTime)
******** new mail returning -1 ********
STATUS cmd:2066, max:-1, min-1
cancel_busy_alarm(-1)
Read char returning: 2066 Down Arrow
Read command returning: 2066 Down Arrow
New_mail_count zeroed
@@@@ current:33
new mail called (0 2 1)
STATUS cmd:2066, max:-1, min-1
cancel_busy_alarm(-1)
Read char returning: 2066 Down Arrow
Read command returning: 2066 Down Arrow
New_mail_count zeroed
@@@@ current:33
new mail called (0 2 1)
STATUS cmd:2066, max:-1, min-1
cancel_busy_alarm(-1)
Read char returning: 2066 Down Arrow
Read command returning: 2066 Down Arrow
New_mail_count zeroed
@@@@ current:33
new mail called (0 2 1)
STATUS cmd:2066, max:-1, min-1
cancel_busy_alarm(-1)
Read char returning: 2066 Down Arrow
Read command returning: 2066 Down Arrow
New_mail_count zeroed
@@@@ current:33
new mail called (0 2 1)
STATUS cmd:2066, max:-1, min-1
cancel_busy_alarm(-1)
Read char returning: 2066 Down Arrow
Read command returning: 2066 Down Arrow
New_mail_count zeroed
@@@@ current:33
new mail called (0 2 1)
STATUS cmd:2066, max:-1, min-1
cancel_busy_alarm(-1)
Read char returning: 2066 Down Arrow
Read command returning: 2066 Down Arrow
New_mail_count zeroed
@@@@ current:33
new mail called (0 2 1)
STATUS cmd:2066, max:-1, min-1
cancel_busy_alarm(-1)
Read char returning: 2065 Up Arrow
Read command returning: 2065 Up Arrow
New_mail_count zeroed
@@@@ current:33
new mail called (0 2 1)
STATUS cmd:2065, max:-1, min-1
cancel_busy_alarm(-1)
Read char returning: 2066 Down Arrow
Read command returning: 2066 Down Arrow
New_mail_count zeroed
@@@@ current:33
new mail called (0 2 1)
STATUS cmd:2066, max:-1, min-1
cancel_busy_alarm(-1)
Read char returning: 2066 Down Arrow
Read command returning: 2066 Down Arrow
New_mail_count zeroed
@@@@ current:33
new mail called (0 2 1)
STATUS cmd:2066, max:-1, min-1
cancel_busy_alarm(-1)
Read char returning: 2066 Down Arrow
Read command returning: 2066 Down Arrow
New_mail_count zeroed
@@@@ current:33
new mail called (0 2 1)
STATUS cmd:2066, max:-1, min-1
cancel_busy_alarm(-1)
Read char returning: 2066 Down Arrow
Read command returning: 2066 Down Arrow
New_mail_count zeroed
@@@@ current:33
new mail called (0 2 1)
STATUS cmd:2066, max:-1, min-1
cancel_busy_alarm(-1)
Read char returning: 2066 Down Arrow
Read command returning: 2066 Down Arrow
New_mail_count zeroed
@@@@ current:33
new mail called (0 2 1)
STATUS cmd:2066, max:-1, min-1
cancel_busy_alarm(-1)
Read char returning: 105 i
Read command returning: 105 i
New_mail_count zeroed

- process_cmd((504)�) -
PROCESS_CMD return: 0
cancel_busy_alarm(-1)

---- MAIL INDEX ----

---- INDEX MANAGER ----
new mail called (0 2 1)
set_titlebar - style: 2 current message cnt:1 current_pl: 0 total_pl: 0
comatose(33) returns:"33"
comatose(1474) returns:"1,474"
=== setup_header_widths(1474) ===
Hit: Returning 40079db8 -> <+ N 20 Oct 10 Lewis Joel Greene (2,323) Processo 00/0787-0 (80), 66507400>
Hit: Returning 40079e10 -> <+ N 21 Oct 10 #BIR:DIR (143K) FW: Agreement with Middlesex Univers (80), 189881735>
Hit: Returning 40079e68 -> <+ 22 Oct 10 Roberto Souto Pere (621) aditivo para fapesp (80), 20846604>
Hit: Returning 40079ec0 -> < N 23 Oct 10 Reforme (4,355) V Cong.CLAD: Intervencion Panel 11 (80), 135627454>
Hit: Returning 40079f18 -> < N 24 Oct 10 Hernani Luiz Vila (2,464) Apresenta��o e d�vida (80), 231703739>
Hit: Returning 40079f70 -> <+ 25 Oct 10 Dora Pratt (2,152) noticias (80), 252630691>
Hit: Returning 40079fc8 -> <+ D 26 Oct 10 Polo, Maria del Ro (3,994) Nuevo bebe!!! (80), 196105735>
Hit: Returning 4007a020 -> < D 27 Oct 10 Jana Bradley (5,231) Travel Award to ALA in San Francisco (80), 164004635>
Hit: Returning 4007a078 -> < D 28 Oct 10 Roberta Segreti (7,518) Fwd: ALA San Francisco Student Trave (80), 81677285>
Hit: Returning 4007a0d0 -> <+ D 29 Oct 10 Oliveira, Cristian (4,746) RE: Consultora Legislacao - Alimento (80), 21551069>
Hit: Returning 4007a128 -> <+ D 30 Oct 10 Ana Maria C. Arauj (1,695) Re: sugestao (80), 103862635>
Hit: Returning 4007a180 -> < D 31 Oct 10 Taruhn, Rosane (BI (3,738) [Gerentes-l] RE: [Gerentes-l] Re: su (80), 104713930>
Hit: Returning 4007a1d8 -> <+ D 32 Oct 10 Castro, Elenice de (2,050) mensagem do Pedro (80), 127876713>
=== format_index_line(33,1442) ===
Parse date: "Tue, 10 Oct 2000 06:49:39 -0700 (PDT)" to.. hours_off_gmt:-7 min_off_gmt:0
Parse date: wkday:2 month:10 year:2000 day:10 hour:6 min:49 sec:39
comatose(8003) returns:"8,003"
INDEX(4007a230) -->+ 33 Oct 10 Pedro Urra (8,003) Fwd: Returned mail: Can't create out<-- (80), 224804841>
Hit: Returning 4007a288 -> <+ N 34 Oct 10 To: Abel L. Packer (860) Direccion de correo (fwd) (80), 197679747>
Hit: Returning 4007a2e0 -> < N 35 Oct 10 To: Ana Maria C. A (2,378) [Gerentes-l] Re: sugestao (80), 262852306>
Hit: Returning 4007a338 -> <+ N 36 Oct 10 #BIR:DIR (3,737) FW: Boletim Peri�dico Empresa - Ano (80), 83007874>
Hit: Returning 4007a390 -> < N 37 Oct 10 [email protected] (2,563) (no subject) (80), 243080536>
Hit: Returning 4007a3e8 -> <+ N 38 Oct 10 Marcia Ymanaka Bar (1,538) [Fwd: Re: Fw: Listserver for the Fri (80), 43994859>
0 ? Help 0
1 O OTHER CMDS 0
2 < FldrList 13
3 > [ViewMsg] 13
4 P PrevMsg 26
5 N NextMsg 26
6 - PrevPage 42
7 Spc NextPage 40
8 D Delete 53
9 U Undelete 53
10 R Reply 66
11 F Forward 66
row: -2, real_row: 22, column: 0
STATUS cmd:120, max:-1, min-1
cancel_busy_alarm(-1)
Read char returning: 13 RETURN
Read command returning: 13 RETURN
New_mail_count zeroed

- process_cmd((505)�) -

----- MAIL VIEW -----
busy_alarm(1, Busy, 00000000, 0)
-- gf_reset local_nvtnl
-- gf_reset wrap
-- gf_reset nvtnl_local
-- gf_pipe: suspend_busy_alarm
resume_busy_alarm
suspend_busy_alarm
resume_busy_alarm
suspend_busy_alarm
resume_busy_alarm
suspend_busy_alarm
resume_busy_alarm
done.
- mailcap_can_display -
- mc_get_command(Multipart/MIXED) -
- mc_init -
mailcap: path: /users/abel/.mailcap:/etc/mailcap:/usr/etc/mailcap:/usr/local/etc/mailcap
mailcap: process_file: /users/abel/.mailcap
mailcap: processing file: /users/abel/.mailcap
mailcap: /users/abel/.mailcap doesn't exist
mailcap: process_file: /etc/mailcap
mailcap: processing file: /etc/mailcap
mailcap: /etc/mailcap doesn't exist
mailcap: process_file: /usr/etc/mailcap
mailcap: processing file: /usr/etc/mailcap
mailcap: /usr/etc/mailcap doesn't exist
mailcap: process_file: /usr/local/etc/mailcap
mailcap: processing file: /usr/local/etc/mailcap
mailcap: /usr/local/etc/mailcap doesn't exist
comatose(9) returns:"9"
- mailcap_can_display -
- mc_get_command(Message/RFC822) -
- mc_init -
mailcap: path: /users/abel/.mailcap:/etc/mailcap:/usr/etc/mailcap:/usr/local/etc/mailcap
mailcap: process_file: /users/abel/.mailcap
mailcap: processing file: /users/abel/.mailcap
mailcap: /users/abel/.mailcap doesn't exist
mailcap: process_file: /etc/mailcap
mailcap: processing file: /etc/mailcap
mailcap: /etc/mailcap doesn't exist
mailcap: process_file: /usr/etc/mailcap
mailcap: processing file: /usr/etc/mailcap
mailcap: /usr/etc/mailcap doesn't exist
mailcap: process_file: /usr/local/etc/mailcap
mailcap: processing file: /usr/local/etc/mailcap
mailcap: /usr/local/etc/mailcap doesn't exist
- mailcap_can_display -
- mc_get_command(Multipart/REPORT) -
- mc_init -
mailcap: path: /users/abel/.mailcap:/etc/mailcap:/usr/etc/mailcap:/usr/local/etc/mailcap
mailcap: process_file: /users/abel/.mailcap
mailcap: processing file: /users/abel/.mailcap
mailcap: /users/abel/.mailcap doesn't exist
mailcap: process_file: /etc/mailcap
mailcap: processing file: /etc/mailcap
mailcap: /etc/mailcap doesn't exist
mailcap: process_file: /usr/etc/mailcap
mailcap: processing file: /usr/etc/mailcap
mailcap: /usr/etc/mailcap doesn't exist
mailcap: process_file: /usr/local/etc/mailcap
mailcap: processing file: /usr/local/etc/mailcap
mailcap: /usr/local/etc/mailcap doesn't exist
comatose(10) returns:"10"
- mailcap_can_display -
- mc_get_command(Message/DELIVERY-STATUS) -
- mc_init -
mailcap: path: /users/abel/.mailcap:/etc/mailcap:/usr/etc/mailcap:/usr/local/etc/mailcap
mailcap: process_file: /users/abel/.mailcap
mailcap: processing file: /users/abel/.mailcap
mailcap: /users/abel/.mailcap doesn't exist
mailcap: process_file: /etc/mailcap
mailcap: processing file: /etc/mailcap
mailcap: /etc/mailcap doesn't exist
mailcap: process_file: /usr/etc/mailcap
mailcap: processing file: /usr/etc/mailcap
mailcap: /usr/etc/mailcap doesn't exist
mailcap: process_file: /usr/local/etc/mailcap
mailcap: processing file: /usr/local/etc/mailcap
mailcap: /usr/local/etc/mailcap doesn't exist
- mailcap_can_display -
- mc_get_command(Message/RFC822) -
- mc_init -
mailcap: path: /users/abel/.mailcap:/etc/mailcap:/usr/etc/mailcap:/usr/local/etc/mailcap
mailcap: process_file: /users/abel/.mailcap
mailcap: processing file: /users/abel/.mailcap
mailcap: /users/abel/.mailcap doesn't exist
mailcap: process_file: /etc/mailcap
mailcap: processing file: /etc/mailcap
mailcap: /etc/mailcap doesn't exist
mailcap: process_file: /usr/etc/mailcap
mailcap: processing file: /usr/etc/mailcap
mailcap: /usr/etc/mailcap doesn't exist
mailcap: process_file: /usr/local/etc/mailcap
mailcap: processing file: /usr/local/etc/mailcap
mailcap: /usr/local/etc/mailcap doesn't exist
comatose(147) returns:"147"
suspend_busy_alarm
resume_busy_alarm
suspend_busy_alarm
resume_busy_alarm
suspend_busy_alarm
resume_busy_alarm
suspend_busy_alarm
resume_busy_alarm
suspend_busy_alarm
resume_busy_alarm
suspend_busy_alarm
resume_busy_alarm
suspend_busy_alarm
resume_busy_alarm
suspend_busy_alarm
resume_busy_alarm
suspend_busy_alarm
resume_busy_alarm
busy_alarm(1, Busy, 00000000, 0)
-- gf_reset escape
-- gf_reset wrap
-- gf_reset nvtnl_local
-- gf_pipe: suspend_busy_alarm
resume_busy_alarm
suspend_busy_alarm
resume_busy_alarm
suspend_busy_alarm
resume_busy_alarm
suspend_busy_alarm
resume_busy_alarm
suspend_busy_alarm
resume_busy_alarm
suspend_busy_alarm
resume_busy_alarm
done.
-- gf_reset escape
-- gf_reset wrap
-- gf_reset line_test
-- gf_pipe: done.
-- gf_reset local_nvtnl
-- gf_reset wrap
-- gf_reset nvtnl_local
-- gf_pipe: done.
busy_alarm(1, Busy, 00000000, 0)
-- gf_reset escape
-- gf_reset wrap
-- gf_reset nvtnl_local
-- gf_pipe: done.
-- gf_reset escape
-- gf_reset wrap
-- gf_reset line_test
-- gf_pipe: done.
busy_alarm(1, Busy, 00000000, 0)
-- gf_reset escape
-- gf_reset wrap
-- gf_reset nvtnl_local
-- gf_pipe: done.
-- gf_reset escape
-- gf_reset wrap
-- gf_reset line_test
-- gf_pipe: done.
-- gf_reset local_nvtnl
-- gf_reset wrap
-- gf_reset nvtnl_local
-- gf_pipe: done.
busy_alarm(1, Busy, 00000000, 0)
-- gf_reset escape
-- gf_reset wrap
-- gf_reset nvtnl_local
-- gf_pipe: done.
cancel_busy_alarm(-1)
@@@@ current:33
set_titlebar - style: 3 current message cnt:1 current_pl: 19 total_pl: 207
comatose(33) returns:"33"
comatose(1474) returns:"1,474"
0 ? Help 0
1 O OTHER CMDS 0
2 < MsgIndex 13
3 > ViewAttch 13
4 P PrevMsg 26
5 N NextMsg 26
6 - PrevPage 42
7 Spc NextPage 40
8 D Delete 53
9 U Undelete 53
10 R Reply 66
11 F Forward 66
row: -2, real_row: 22, column: 0
new mail called (0 0 1)
- adrbk_maintenance -
check_point(GoodTime)
******** new mail returning -1 ********
Clearing status line
STATUS cmd:120, max:-1, min-1
cancel_busy_alarm(-1)
Read char returning: 113 q
Read command returning: 113 q
New_mail_count zeroed

- process_cmd((501)�) -
MAIL_CMD: quit
PROCESS_CMD return: 0
cancel_busy_alarm(-1)

---- QUIT SCREEN ----
suspend_busy_alarm
0 Y [Yes] 0
1 N No 0
2 (null) (null) 13
3 (null) (null) 13
4 (null) (null) 26
5 (null) (null) 26
6 (null) (null) 40
7 (null) (null) 40
8 (null) (null) 53
9 (null) (null) 53
10 (null) (null) 66
11 (null) (null) 66
row: -2, real_row: 22, column: 0
Read char returning: 121 y
Want_to read: y (121)
resume_busy_alarm
- completely_done_with_adrbks -
- init_abook -
addrbook nickname = .addressbook filename = /users/abel/.addressbook ostatus was Closed, want TotallyClosed
- adrbk_close(/users/abel/.addressbook) -
- clear_entryref_cache -
expunge and close mail stream "/var/mail/abel"
q_status_message(Closing "INBOX"...)
output_message(Closing "INBOX"...)
suspend_busy_alarm
d_q_status_message(Closing "INBOX"...)
0 Y [Yes] 0
1 N No 0
2 (null) (null) 13
3 (null) (null) 13
4 (null) (null) 26
5 (null) (null) 26
6 (null) (null) 40
7 (null) (null) 40
8 (null) (null) 53
9 (null) (null) 53
10 (null) (null) 66
11 (null) (null) 66
row: -2, real_row: 22, column: 0
Read char returning: 121 y
Want_to read: y (121)
resume_busy_alarm
comatose(1467) returns:"1,467"
Done with IMAP critical on /var/mail/abel
mm_expunged(/var/mail/abel,1443)
mm_expunged(/var/mail/abel,1443)
mm_expunged(/var/mail/abel,1443)
mm_expunged(/var/mail/abel,1443)
mm_expunged(/var/mail/abel,1443)
mm_expunged(/var/mail/abel,1443)
mm_expunged(/var/mail/abel,1443)
=== mm_exists(1467,/var/mail/abel) called ===
Done with IMAP critical on /var/mail/abel
IMAP 18:11:39 10/10 mm_log babble: Expunged 7 messages
pine_close_stream: closing "/var/mail/abel"
end_screen called
about to end_tty_driver
end_signals(0)

--------------857AAEF75C1D265809085D54--

From [email protected] Wed Oct 11 04:55:54 2000 -0700
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Wed, 11 Oct 2000 04:55:53 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.1])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id EAA06760;
Wed, 11 Oct 2000 04:55:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists5.u.washington.edu ([email protected] [140.142.56.6])
by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id EAA27805;
Wed, 11 Oct 2000 04:55:51 -0700
Received: from host ([email protected] [140.142.56.13])
by lists5.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id EAA07037;
Wed, 11 Oct 2000 04:54:50 -0700
Received: from mxu2.u.washington.edu (mxu2.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.9])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id EAA124176
for <[email protected]>; Wed, 11 Oct 2000 04:52:57 -0700
Received: from skippy.hhnt.org.uk (skippy.hhnt.org.uk [193.32.22.91])
by mxu2.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id EAA16136
for <[email protected]>; Wed, 11 Oct 2000 04:52:56 -0700
Received: from agent-cxh (unverified) by skippy.hhnt.org.uk
(Content Technologies SMTPRS 4.1.5) with SMTP id <[email protected]> for <[email protected]>;
Wed, 11 Oct 2000 12:57:35 +0100
Received: from HHT-Message_Server by agent-cxh
with Novell_GroupWise; Wed, 11 Oct 2000 12:42:38 +0100
Message-Id: <s9e4603e.066@agent-cxh>
Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2000 12:42:17 +0100
Sender: [email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
From: "Bridget Nichols" <[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
Subject: command line patch - outgoing.patch
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
X-To: <[email protected]>
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN

My directory structure is ../../tmp/pine4.21/pine...

I have an executable called pine in the pine directory under pine4.21

If I place the command line patch (outgoing.patch) in the pine4.21 director=
y it fails for all hunks.

I do not understand the first line of the patch:
diff -rc pine4.21/pico/pico.c pine4.21.outgoing/pico/pico.c

I can run the patch command from the ../tmp directory and it will locate pi=
ne4.21/pico/pico.c, but not pine4.21.outgoing/pico/pico.c

Where am I going wrong?

**********************************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and=20
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they =20
are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify=20
your email system administrator.

This footnote also confirms that this email message has been checked
for the presence of computer viruses.
**********************************************************************
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------
For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see:
http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/
-----------------------------------------------------------------

From [email protected] Wed Oct 11 09:17:04 2000 -0700
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Wed, 11 Oct 2000 09:17:04 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.1])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id JAA22661;
Wed, 11 Oct 2000 09:17:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists5.u.washington.edu ([email protected] [140.142.56.6])
by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id JAA01678;
Wed, 11 Oct 2000 09:17:02 -0700
Received: from host ([email protected] [140.142.56.13])
by lists5.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id JAA14188;
Wed, 11 Oct 2000 09:15:56 -0700
Received: from mxu1.u.washington.edu (mxu1.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.8])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id JAA119290
for <[email protected]>; Wed, 11 Oct 2000 09:12:51 -0700
Received: from pilsener.srv.ualberta.ca (pilsener.srv.ualberta.ca [129.128.5.19])
by mxu1.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id JAA23813
for <[email protected]>; Wed, 11 Oct 2000 09:12:48 -0700
Received: from gpu5.srv.ualberta.ca (gpu5.srv.ualberta.ca [129.128.98.19])
by pilsener.srv.ualberta.ca (8.10.2/8.10.2) with ESMTP id e9BGClq22439
for <[email protected]>; Wed, 11 Oct 2000 10:12:47 -0600 (MDT)
Received: from localhost (maldridg@localhost)
by gpu5.srv.ualberta.ca (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id KAA50572
for <[email protected]>; Wed, 11 Oct 2000 10:12:47 -0600
Message-Id: <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2000 10:12:46 -0600 (MDT)
Sender: [email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
From: Lea <[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
Subject: "review recent ..."
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
X-Sender: [email protected]
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN

I accidentally stumbled on a useful feature of Pine, and have now made it
happen twice. Problem is, I have no idea how I'm doing it, and couldn't
find anything specific in the Pine info pages on the web. Both times that
it's happened I've been in my INBOX folder and meaning to exit to the
Main menu, I hit some combination of keys that produced a screen titled
'review recent messages'. The screen showed a summary of how many
messages were marked deleted, new messages that had arrived, and other
useful information - a summary of activity for that particular Pine
session. How do I reproduce this? I'd like to use it as a tool.

Lea

--
-----------------------------------------------------------------
For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see:
http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/
-----------------------------------------------------------------

From [email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Wed, 11 Oct 2000 09:52:27 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.1])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id JAA16471;
Wed, 11 Oct 2000 09:52:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists3.u.washington.edu ([email protected] [140.142.56.3])
by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id JAA02786;
Wed, 11 Oct 2000 09:52:26 -0700
Received: from host ([email protected] [140.142.56.13])
by lists3.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id JAA14680;
Wed, 11 Oct 2000 09:51:40 -0700
Received: from mxu4.u.washington.edu (mxu4.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.8])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id JAA25898
for <[email protected]>; Wed, 11 Oct 2000 09:49:42 -0700
Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1])
by mxu4.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id JAA22288
for <[email protected]>; Wed, 11 Oct 2000 09:49:42 -0700
Received: from pilsener.srv.ualberta.ca (pilsener.srv.ualberta.ca [129.128.5.19])
by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id JAA18370
for <[email protected]>; Wed, 11 Oct 2000 09:49:41 -0700
Received: from gpu5.srv.ualberta.ca (gpu5.srv.ualberta.ca [129.128.98.19])
by pilsener.srv.ualberta.ca (8.10.2/8.10.2) with ESMTP id e9BGnUq12342
for <[email protected]>; Wed, 11 Oct 2000 10:49:30 -0600 (MDT)
Received: from localhost (maldridg@localhost)
by gpu5.srv.ualberta.ca (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id KAA37324
for <[email protected]>; Wed, 11 Oct 2000 10:49:30 -0600
Message-Id: <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2000 10:49:30 -0600 (MDT)
Sender: [email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
From: Lea <[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: "review recent ..."
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0010112207120.18003-100000@cfdlab.aero.iisc.ernet.in>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-To: Pine Information List <[email protected]>
X-Sender: [email protected]
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN

With many thanks to Mohit Agarwal, I have an answer. What I was looking
for was the 'Journal' feature. Pressing J while in Pine's Main menu
activates it.

Lea

From [email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Wed, 11 Oct 2000 12:47:27 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id MAA28835;
Wed, 11 Oct 2000 12:47:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists3.u.washington.edu ([email protected] [140.142.56.3])
by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id MAA24345;
Wed, 11 Oct 2000 12:47:26 -0700
Received: from host ([email protected] [140.142.56.13])
by lists3.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id MAA25771;
Wed, 11 Oct 2000 12:46:28 -0700
Received: from mxu3.u.washington.edu (mxu3.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.7])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id MAA150762
for <[email protected]>; Wed, 11 Oct 2000 12:44:44 -0700
Received: from bom2.vsnl.net.in (bom2.vsnl.net.in [202.54.1.1])
by mxu3.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id MAA26284
for <[email protected]>; Wed, 11 Oct 2000 12:44:42 -0700
Received: from hal9k.myip.org (unknown [203.197.59.121])
by bom2.vsnl.net.in (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A8AD442E
for <[email protected]>; Thu, 12 Oct 2000 01:14:35 +0530 (GMT+5:30)
Received: from localhost (IDENT:satyap@localhost [127.0.0.1])
by hal9k.myip.org (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id XAA03474
for <[email protected]>; Wed, 11 Oct 2000 23:13:21 +0530
Message-Id: <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2000 23:13:21 +0530 (IST)
Sender: [email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
From: Satya <[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: "review recent ..."
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
X-Sender: [email protected]
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN

On Oct 11, 2000 at 10:49, Lea wrote:

>With many thanks to Mohit Agarwal, I have an answer. What I was looking
>for was the 'Journal' feature. Pressing J while in Pine's Main menu
>activates it.

Wow, I never noticed. This is cool. Note that these are in fact all the
status line messages!

--
Satya. <URL:http://satya.virtualave.net/>
US-bound grad students! For pre-apps, see <URL:http://quickapps.cjb.net/>
"Never underestimate the bandwidth of a station wagon full of magnetic
tape." -- Andrew Tanenbaum

From [email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 12 Oct 2000 02:43:23 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.1])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id CAA04955;
Thu, 12 Oct 2000 02:43:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists5.u.washington.edu ([email protected] [140.142.56.6])
by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id CAA27640;
Thu, 12 Oct 2000 02:43:14 -0700
Received: from host ([email protected] [140.142.56.13])
by lists5.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id CAA02244;
Thu, 12 Oct 2000 02:42:16 -0700
Received: from mxu3.u.washington.edu (mxu3.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.7])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id CAA161610
for <[email protected]>; Thu, 12 Oct 2000 02:40:24 -0700
Received: from skippy.hhnt.org.uk (skippy.hhnt.org.uk [193.32.22.91])
by mxu3.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id CAA10694
for <[email protected]>; Thu, 12 Oct 2000 02:40:23 -0700
Received: from agent-cxh (unverified) by skippy.hhnt.org.uk
(Content Technologies SMTPRS 4.1.5) with SMTP id <[email protected]> for <[email protected]>;
Thu, 12 Oct 2000 10:56:28 +0100
Received: from HHT-Message_Server by agent-cxh
with Novell_GroupWise; Thu, 12 Oct 2000 10:41:36 +0100
Message-Id: <s9e59560.083@agent-cxh>
Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2000 10:41:24 +0100
Sender: [email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
From: "Bridget Nichols" <[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
Subject: patch failing
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
X-To: <[email protected]>
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN

I reduced the command line patch to the first hunk (removing the diff -rc l=
ine) as follows:

*** pine4.21/pico/pico.c Thu Jun 10 15:56:16 1999=20
--- pine4.21.outgoing/pico/pico.c Thu Feb 24 02:29:09 2000 ***********=
****
*** 133,138 ****=20
---- 133,143 ----=20
pico_all_done =3D 0;
km_popped =3D 0; =
=20

+ if (pm->auto_cmds){=20
+ #define CTRL_X 24=20
+ if ((pm->auto_cmds[0] =3D=3D CTRL_X) && (pm->auto_cmds[1] =3D=3D 'y')=
){
+ return (1);}}=20
+ =20
if(!vtinit()) /* Init Displays. */
return(COMP_CANCEL);
P_CANCEL);=20

My understanding is that this should insert those lines starting with a "+"=
into .../pine4.21.outgoing/pico/pico.c

My output reads as follows:

Processing... Looks like a context diff...=20
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------=20
|*** pine4.21/pico/pico.c Thu Jun 10 15:56:16 1999
|--- pine4.21.outgoing/pico/pico.c Thu Feb 24 02:29:09 2000 ---------=
-----------------=20
Patching file pine4.21/pico/pico.c using Plan A... patch: =
3016-030 (This is really a new-style context diff but without the telltale =
extra asterisks on the *** line that usually indicate the new style...)
Hunk #1 failed at 133.
1 out of 1 hunks failed--saving rejects to pine4.21/pico/pico.c.rej
done =20

**********************************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and=20
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they =20
are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify=20
your email system administrator.

This footnote also confirms that this email message has been checked
for the presence of computer viruses.
**********************************************************************
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------
For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see:
http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/
-----------------------------------------------------------------

From [email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 12 Oct 2000 04:05:23 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id EAA10393;
Thu, 12 Oct 2000 04:05:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists4.u.washington.edu ([email protected] [140.142.56.2])
by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id EAA13152;
Thu, 12 Oct 2000 04:05:21 -0700
Received: from host ([email protected] [140.142.56.13])
by lists4.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id EAA12904;
Thu, 12 Oct 2000 04:04:23 -0700
Received: from mxu2.u.washington.edu (mxu2.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.9])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id EAA41634
for <[email protected]>; Thu, 12 Oct 2000 04:02:01 -0700
Received: from skippy.hhnt.org.uk (skippy.hhnt.org.uk [193.32.22.91])
by mxu2.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id EAA20297
for <[email protected]>; Thu, 12 Oct 2000 04:01:59 -0700
Received: from agent-cxh (unverified) by skippy.hhnt.org.uk
(Content Technologies SMTPRS 4.1.5) with SMTP id <[email protected]> for <[email protected]>;
Thu, 12 Oct 2000 12:18:01 +0100
Received: from HHT-Message_Server by agent-cxh
with Novell_GroupWise; Thu, 12 Oct 2000 12:03:07 +0100
Message-Id: <s9e5a87b.061@agent-cxh>
Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2000 12:02:42 +0100
Sender: [email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
From: "Bridget Nichols" <[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
Subject: patch failing - resolved
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
X-To: <[email protected]>
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN

My patch file had ^M at end of every line, may have been result of download=
..

**********************************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and=20
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they =20
are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify=20
your email system administrator.

This footnote also confirms that this email message has been checked
for the presence of computer viruses.
**********************************************************************
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------
For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see:
http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/
-----------------------------------------------------------------

From [email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 12 Oct 2000 12:09:12 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id MAA24953;
Thu, 12 Oct 2000 12:09:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists4.u.washington.edu ([email protected] [140.142.56.2])
by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id MAA26073;
Thu, 12 Oct 2000 12:09:09 -0700
Received: from host ([email protected] [140.142.56.13])
by lists4.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id MAA01310;
Thu, 12 Oct 2000 12:07:19 -0700
Received: from mxu4.u.washington.edu (mxu4.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.8])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id MAA164004
for <[email protected]>; Thu, 12 Oct 2000 12:04:45 -0700
Received: from alfred.cc.uottawa.ca (alfred.cc.uottawa.ca [137.122.6.40])
by mxu4.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id MAA28266
for <[email protected]>; Thu, 12 Oct 2000 12:04:44 -0700
Received: from fatherubu.cc.uottawa.ca (fatherubu.cc.uottawa.ca [137.122.170.100])
by alfred.cc.uottawa.ca (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id PAA06786
for <[email protected]>; Thu, 12 Oct 2000 15:04:43 -0400
Message-Id: <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2000 15:04:43 -0400 (Eastern Daylight Time)
Sender: [email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
From: Paul Deveau <[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
Subject: Pine freezes when sending
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-X-Sender: [email protected]
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN

Hi:

I recently upgraded an RS/6000 from AIX 4.1 to 4.2.1. Since then Pine has
not been able to send e-mail. After composing a note and pressing Ctrl-X
to send it Pine kind of locks up with the message "Sending mail/" in the
bottom.

I grabbed the latest AIX binary from the Pine FTP site, and copied over a
binary that works on another system, but to no avail.

Any ideas?

Thanks.

Paul Deveau
Centrale des ordinateurs - Computer Centre
562-5800 x3774

--
-----------------------------------------------------------------
For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see:
http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/
-----------------------------------------------------------------

From [email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Fri, 13 Oct 2000 05:46:19 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id FAA16849;
Fri, 13 Oct 2000 05:46:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists3.u.washington.edu ([email protected] [140.142.56.3])
by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id FAA19136;
Fri, 13 Oct 2000 05:46:17 -0700
Received: from host ([email protected] [140.142.56.13])
by lists3.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id FAA25082;
Fri, 13 Oct 2000 05:45:14 -0700
Received: from mxu4.u.washington.edu (mxu4.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.8])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id FAA212508
for <[email protected]>; Fri, 13 Oct 2000 05:44:24 -0700
Received: from tunku.uady.mx (tunku.uady.mx [148.209.1.1])
by mxu4.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id FAA30433
for <[email protected]>; Fri, 13 Oct 2000 05:44:22 -0700
Received: from localhost (angel@localhost)
by tunku.uady.mx (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id e9DClnI13043;
Fri, 13 Oct 2000 07:47:51 -0500 (CDT)
Message-Id: <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2000 07:47:49 -0500 (CDT)
Sender: [email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
From: "Angel G. Polanco Rodriguez" <[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
Subject: again please
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-To: Paul Deveau <[email protected]>
X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN

Well, I have a problem with PINE. This odnt delete messages when a user
has marked messages and quit...when the user comeback and have a new
session with pine, the messages marked "deleted" there are here, dou you
know this problem in the server with pine?

Please send your comments because now a lot users have this problem.

Greetings from Mayan World

************************************
| Q.B.B.ANGEL G. POLANCO RODRIGUEZ |
| UNIVERSIDAD AUTONOMA DE YUCATAN |
| DIRECCION GENERAL DE |
| DESARROLLO ACADEMICO |
| DEPARTAMENTO DE TELEINFORMATICA|
| CALLE 59 POR AV. ITZAEZ # 490 |
| MERIDA, YUCATAN, MEXICO |
| CODIGO POSTAL : 97 000 |
| TELEFONO:52 (99) 23 74 28 |
| E-mail: [email protected] |
************************************

From [email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Fri, 13 Oct 2000 08:50:36 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id IAA12884;
Fri, 13 Oct 2000 08:50:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists5.u.washington.edu ([email protected] [140.142.56.6])
by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id IAA23526;
Fri, 13 Oct 2000 08:50:34 -0700
Received: from host ([email protected] [140.142.56.13])
by lists5.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id IAA04861;
Fri, 13 Oct 2000 08:48:57 -0700
Received: from bp15.u.washington.edu ([email protected] [140.142.15.205])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id IAA54590
for <[email protected]>; Fri, 13 Oct 2000 08:48:10 -0700
Received: from localhost (leibrand@localhost)
by bp15.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id IAA158268;
Fri, 13 Oct 2000 08:47:52 -0700
Message-Id: <Pine.A41.4.29.9999.0010130846040.161916-100000@bp15.u.washington.edu>
Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2000 08:47:52 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: [email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
From: Scott Leibrand <[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: again please
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-To: "Angel G. Polanco Rodriguez" <[email protected]>
X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
X-Sender: <[email protected]>
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN

On Fri, 13 Oct 2000, Angel G. Polanco Rodriguez wrote:

> Well, I have a problem with PINE. This odnt delete messages when a user
> has marked messages and quit...when the user comeback and have a new
> session with pine, the messages marked "deleted" there are here, dou you
> know this problem in the server with pine?

What happens when they push X to expunge the messages manually? If that
works, you might want to check in Main, Setup, Config to see which of the
following options are set. (This is how mine are, for reference.)

[ ] expunge-only-manually
[X] expunge-without-confirm
[X] expunge-without-confirm-everywhere

--
Scott Leibrand
[email protected] (Yes, that is a valid address.)
http://students.washington.edu/leibrand
http://www.nwlink.com/~leibrand
* RCW 19.190 notice: This email address is located in Washington State. *
* Unsolicited commercial email may be billed $500 per message. *

From [email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Fri, 13 Oct 2000 09:39:25 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id JAA26647;
Fri, 13 Oct 2000 09:39:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists4.u.washington.edu ([email protected] [140.142.56.2])
by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id JAA25198;
Fri, 13 Oct 2000 09:39:23 -0700
Received: from host ([email protected] [140.142.56.13])
by lists4.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id JAA17684;
Fri, 13 Oct 2000 09:37:54 -0700
Received: from mxu2.u.washington.edu (mxu2.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.9])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id JAA161166
for <[email protected]>; Fri, 13 Oct 2000 09:37:03 -0700
Received: from tunku.uady.mx (tunku.uady.mx [148.209.1.1])
by mxu2.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id JAA27922;
Fri, 13 Oct 2000 09:36:45 -0700
Received: from localhost (angel@localhost)
by tunku.uady.mx (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id e9DGeFH26661;
Fri, 13 Oct 2000 11:40:16 -0500 (CDT)
Message-Id: <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2000 11:40:15 -0500 (CDT)
Sender: [email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
From: "Angel G. Polanco Rodriguez" <[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: again please
In-Reply-To: <Pine.A41.4.29.9999.0010130846040.161916-100000@bp15.u.washington.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-To: Scott Leibrand <[email protected]>
X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN

OK Scott, thanks by your tip.

************************************
| Q.B.B.ANGEL G. POLANCO RODRIGUEZ |
| UNIVERSIDAD AUTONOMA DE YUCATAN |
| DIRECCION GENERAL DE |
| DESARROLLO ACADEMICO |
| DEPARTAMENTO DE TELEINFORMATICA|
| CALLE 59 POR AV. ITZAEZ # 490 |
| MERIDA, YUCATAN, MEXICO |
| CODIGO POSTAL : 97 000 |
| TELEFONO:52 (99) 23 74 28 |
| E-mail: [email protected] |
************************************

On Fri, 13 Oct 2000, Scott Leibrand wrote:

> On Fri, 13 Oct 2000, Angel G. Polanco Rodriguez wrote:
>
> > Well, I have a problem with PINE. This odnt delete messages when a user
> > has marked messages and quit...when the user comeback and have a new
> > session with pine, the messages marked "deleted" there are here, dou you
> > know this problem in the server with pine?
>
> What happens when they push X to expunge the messages manually? If that
> works, you might want to check in Main, Setup, Config to see which of the
> following options are set. (This is how mine are, for reference.)
>
> [ ] expunge-only-manually
> [X] expunge-without-confirm
> [X] expunge-without-confirm-everywhere
>
>
> --
> Scott Leibrand
> [email protected] (Yes, that is a valid address.)
> http://students.washington.edu/leibrand
> http://www.nwlink.com/~leibrand
> * RCW 19.190 notice: This email address is located in Washington State. *
> * Unsolicited commercial email may be billed $500 per message. *
>
>

From [email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Fri, 13 Oct 2000 12:52:00 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.1])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id MAA29880;
Fri, 13 Oct 2000 12:51:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from list3.u.washington.edu ([email protected] [140.142.8.100])
by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id MAA16135;
Fri, 13 Oct 2000 12:51:58 -0700
Received: from host ([email protected] [140.142.56.13])
by list3.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id MAA19238;
Fri, 13 Oct 2000 12:48:14 -0700
Received: from mxu4.u.washington.edu (mxu4.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.8])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id MAA159868
for <[email protected]>; Fri, 13 Oct 2000 12:41:37 -0700
Received: from niwot.scd.ucar.edu (niwot.scd.ucar.edu [128.117.8.223])
by mxu4.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id MAA06817
for <[email protected]>; Fri, 13 Oct 2000 12:41:37 -0700
Received: from sedona.scd.ucar.edu (sedona.scd.ucar.edu [128.117.8.183])
by niwot.scd.ucar.edu (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id NAA27653
for <[email protected]>; Fri, 13 Oct 2000 13:41:33 -0600 (MDT)
Received: from localhost (era@localhost)
by sedona.scd.ucar.edu (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id NAA13715
for <[email protected]>; Fri, 13 Oct 2000 13:41:33 -0600 (MDT)
Message-Id: <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2000 13:41:33 -0600 (MDT)
Reply-To: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
From: Ed Arnold <[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
Subject: pine 4.30 availability?
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-Authentication-Warning: sedona.scd.ucar.edu: era owned process doing -bs
X-Sender: [email protected]
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN

Anyone know the approx. schedule as to when pine 4.30 will be generally
available?

--
-----------------------------------------------------------------
For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see:
http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/
-----------------------------------------------------------------

From [email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Fri, 13 Oct 2000 15:33:42 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.1])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id PAA01843;
Fri, 13 Oct 2000 15:33:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from list2.u.washington.edu ([email protected] [140.142.14.165])
by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id PAA21363;
Fri, 13 Oct 2000 15:33:35 -0700
Received: from host ([email protected] [140.142.56.13])
by list2.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id PAA22236;
Fri, 13 Oct 2000 15:32:08 -0700
Received: from mxu3.u.washington.edu (mxu3.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.7])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id PAA40012
for <[email protected]>; Fri, 13 Oct 2000 15:22:42 -0700
Received: from vger.timpanogas.org ([email protected] [207.109.151.240])
by mxu3.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id PAA03287
for <[email protected]>; Fri, 13 Oct 2000 15:22:41 -0700
Received: from asdf.capslock.lan (HSE-MTL-ppp11844.qc.sympatico.ca [209.226.179.170])
by vger.timpanogas.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA01035
for <[email protected]>; Fri, 13 Oct 2000 16:19:52 -0600
Received: from localhost (mharris@localhost)
by asdf.capslock.lan (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id SAA12477
for <[email protected]>; Fri, 13 Oct 2000 18:22:32 -0400
Message-Id: <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2000 18:22:31 -0400 (EDT)
Sender: [email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
From: "Mike A. Harris" <[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
Subject: PINE format string vulnerabilities
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-Authentication-Warning: asdf.capslock.lan: mharris owned process doing -bs
X-Sender: [email protected]
X-Unexpected-Header: The Spanish Inquisition
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN

Recently on BUGTRAQ someone posted a security audit on PINE
showing that it had over 4000 format string vulnerabilities.
Being an avid PINE user, I was shocked. I do not know the
legitimacy of this claim yet, however I wanted to ask here to get
the official response.

It was suggested on BUGTRAQ that it would be worthless to try and
fix PINE with that many bugs. I disagree completely however as
grep/sed/perl are our friends, and this is open source.

Therefore, has the PINE team an official position on PINE format
string vulnerabilities? Is anyone correcting any such
bugs? Does the PINE team need help doing so? I would be
interested in trying to help correct format string bugs if the
effort wouldn't be duplicated, and I could be assigned certain
portions of code to audit.

Thanks in advance.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Mike A. Harris - Linux advocate - Open source advocate
Computer Consultant - Capslock Consulting
Copyright 2000 all rights reserved
----------------------------------------------------------------------

"A Firewall is really much like a sophisticated traffic cop; it detects and
stops unauthorized or suspicious movement in or out of the network. But
security is more than a Firewall; it's a process. You can't just put in a
Firewall and think you're secure."

--
-----------------------------------------------------------------
For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see:
http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/
-----------------------------------------------------------------

From [email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Sun, 15 Oct 2000 04:03:18 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id EAA21203;
Sun, 15 Oct 2000 04:03:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from list3.u.washington.edu ([email protected] [140.142.8.100])
by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id EAA10668;
Sun, 15 Oct 2000 04:03:04 -0700
Received: from host ([email protected] [140.142.56.13])
by list3.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id EAA16942;
Sun, 15 Oct 2000 04:01:32 -0700
Received: from mxu3.u.washington.edu (mxu3.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.7])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id DAA212550
for <[email protected]>; Sun, 15 Oct 2000 03:59:39 -0700
Received: from students.uz.ac.zw (IDENT:agona@[196.4.80.241])
by mxu3.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id DAA11581
for <[email protected]>; Sun, 15 Oct 2000 03:59:34 -0700
Received: (qmail 7925 invoked by uid 1778); 14 Oct 2000 22:41:02 -0000
Received: from localhost ([email protected])
by localhost with SMTP; 14 Oct 2000 22:41:02 -0000
Message-Id: <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 15 Oct 2000 00:41:02 +0200 (CAT)
Sender: [email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
From: [email protected]
To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
Subject: History & .profile
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN

For what purpose do i have .profile file in my home directory?

Also when i enter history at my prompt i get a listing
of ALL the commands that i made and these number into the thousands, how
can i tell my server to lose the last say 10 commands when i logout.

bye

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Mutumwa Jepson Rushwaya |THE WORST FORM OF VERBAL ABUSE IS TO
[email protected] |IGNORE SOMEONE.
|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

--
-----------------------------------------------------------------
For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see:
http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/
-----------------------------------------------------------------

From [email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Sun, 15 Oct 2000 04:17:01 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id EAA23254;
Sun, 15 Oct 2000 04:17:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from list2.u.washington.edu ([email protected] [140.142.14.165])
by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id EAA10969;
Sun, 15 Oct 2000 04:16:59 -0700
Received: from host ([email protected] [140.142.56.13])
by list2.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id EAA38268;
Sun, 15 Oct 2000 04:15:53 -0700
Received: from mxu4.u.washington.edu (mxu4.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.8])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id EAA195370
for <[email protected]>; Sun, 15 Oct 2000 04:14:27 -0700
Received: from vger.timpanogas.org ([email protected] [207.109.151.240])
by mxu4.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id EAA16666
for <[email protected]>; Sun, 15 Oct 2000 04:14:27 -0700
Received: from asdf.capslock.lan (ppp4002.on.bellglobal.com [206.172.218.162])
by vger.timpanogas.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id FAA08060;
Sun, 15 Oct 2000 05:09:07 -0600
Received: from localhost (mharris@localhost)
by asdf.capslock.lan (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id HAA02301;
Sun, 15 Oct 2000 07:11:27 -0400
Message-Id: <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 15 Oct 2000 07:11:27 -0400 (EDT)
Sender: [email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
From: "Mike A. Harris" <[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: History & .profile
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-To: [email protected]
X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
X-Authentication-Warning: asdf.capslock.lan: mharris owned process doing -bs
X-Sender: [email protected]
X-Unexpected-Header: The Spanish Inquisition
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN

On Sun, 15 Oct 2000 [email protected] wrote:

>Date: Sun, 15 Oct 2000 00:41:02 +0200 (CAT)
>From: [email protected]
>To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
>Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
>Subject: History & .profile
>
>For what purpose do i have .profile file in my home directory?
>
>Also when i enter history at my prompt i get a listing
>of ALL the commands that i made and these number into the thousands, how
>can i tell my server to lose the last say 10 commands when i logout.

Neither question has anything whatsoever to do with PINE at all.

The answer however:

man bash
man csh

HISTSIZE=10

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Mike A. Harris - Linux advocate - Open source advocate
Computer Consultant - Capslock Consulting
Copyright 2000 all rights reserved
----------------------------------------------------------------------

#[Mike A. Harris bash tip #3 - how to disable core dumps]
# Put the following at the bottom of your ~/.bash_profile
ulimit -c 0

From [email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Mon, 16 Oct 2000 00:30:21 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id AAA02200;
Mon, 16 Oct 2000 00:30:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from list2.u.washington.edu ([email protected] [140.142.14.165])
by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id AAA31724;
Mon, 16 Oct 2000 00:30:19 -0700
Received: from host ([email protected] [140.142.56.13])
by list2.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id AAA22234;
Mon, 16 Oct 2000 00:28:47 -0700
Received: from mxu3.u.washington.edu (mxu3.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.7])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id AAA186376
for <[email protected]>; Mon, 16 Oct 2000 00:26:52 -0700
Received: from web5105.mail.yahoo.com (web5105.mail.yahoo.com [216.115.106.75])
by mxu3.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id AAA22704
for <[email protected]>; Mon, 16 Oct 2000 00:26:52 -0700
Received: from [206.124.10.151] by web5105.mail.yahoo.com; Mon, 16 Oct 2000 00:26:48 PDT
Message-Id: <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2000 00:26:48 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: [email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
From: Banananose Maldonado <[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
Subject: pine4.21, ssl connection to imap server
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN

Hi all-

I have a server running imaps with Openssl 0.9.6 on
port 993, which is serving its Netscape clients
properly. It has a self-signed certificate.

To set up Pine on my local host (Solaris 7) to run a
secure connection to this server, I have a line like
this in my .pinerc:

inbox-path={wuf.whatever.com/ssl}INBOX

This doesn't work... I just get "opening inbox" and
a spinning bar forever. Pine was compiled with the
ssl
patch.

The last few lines of my .pine-debug after running
"pine -d9" are:

21:39:24.347168
About to open folder "INBOX" inbox: "INBOX"

21:39:24.347883
busy_alarm(1, Opening "INBOX", 0, 1)

21:39:24.348688
q_status_message(Opening "INBOX" )

21:39:24.349268
output_message(Opening "INBOX" )

21:39:24.351257
STATUS cmd:120, max:1, min0

21:39:24.363004
IMAP 21:39:24 10/15 mm_log babble: Trying IP address
[10.3.0.20]

21:39:25.350137
alarm_signal()
..

The alarm signal repeats over and over... what am I
missing? Do I something akin to a "novalidate-cert"
switch on the inbox-path line? If I try this line:

inbox-path={wuf.whatever.com/ssl/novalidate-cert}INBOX

I get the "Can't open inbox invalid remote
specification" message.

Any help will be greatly appreciated...

Thanks Mucho,
=Barry=

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Messenger - Talk while you surf! It's FREE.
http://im.yahoo.com/
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------
For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see:
http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/
-----------------------------------------------------------------

From [email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Mon, 16 Oct 2000 10:27:17 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.1])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id KAA24726;
Mon, 16 Oct 2000 10:27:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from list2.u.washington.edu ([email protected] [140.142.14.165])
by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id KAA00586;
Mon, 16 Oct 2000 10:27:15 -0700
Received: from host ([email protected] [140.142.56.13])
by list2.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id KAA17284;
Mon, 16 Oct 2000 10:25:42 -0700
Received: from mxu2.u.washington.edu (mxu2.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.9])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id KAA160300
for <[email protected]>; Mon, 16 Oct 2000 10:23:51 -0700
Received: from law.usc.edu (law.usc.edu [128.125.42.6])
by mxu2.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id KAA13100
for <[email protected]>; Mon, 16 Oct 2000 10:23:50 -0700
Received: from l2122.usc.edu (l2122 [128.125.42.67])
by law.usc.edu (Pro-8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA18990
for <[email protected]>; Mon, 16 Oct 2000 10:29:28 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2000 10:23:49 -0700 (Pacific Daylight Time)
Sender: [email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
From: Robert Larmon <[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
Subject: Pine 4.21 feature not in PC-Pine 4.21?
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
X-X-Sender: [email protected]
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN

The feature I'm referring to is Pine's beginning of the month, move the
sent-mail mailbox feature (I don't know the official name).

Does PC-Pine have this feature to ask the user to move/delete the old
sent-mail mailbox that Pine does? I'm finding that users using PC-Pine
are bloating their sent-mail folder, and I'm trying to figure out a
solution. Any ideas?

Can anyone confirm this for me?

Thanks,

Robert

```````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````
` Robert Larmon `
` PC Systems Analyst `
` USC Law School Computing Services `
` [email protected] `
'''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''

--
-----------------------------------------------------------------
For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see:
http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/
-----------------------------------------------------------------

From [email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Mon, 16 Oct 2000 11:20:42 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id LAA27217;
Mon, 16 Oct 2000 11:20:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from list1.u.washington.edu ([email protected] [140.142.8.99])
by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id LAA17706;
Mon, 16 Oct 2000 11:20:40 -0700
Received: from host ([email protected] [140.142.56.13])
by list1.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id LAA34166;
Mon, 16 Oct 2000 11:19:22 -0700
Received: from mxu3.u.washington.edu (mxu3.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.7])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id LAA159764
for <[email protected]>; Mon, 16 Oct 2000 11:15:29 -0700
Received: from moose.uvm.edu (moose.uvm.edu [132.198.101.60])
by mxu3.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id LAA01841
for <[email protected]>; Mon, 16 Oct 2000 11:15:28 -0700
Received: from gnu.uvm.edu (gnu.uvm.edu [132.198.101.64])
by moose.uvm.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA124610
for <[email protected]>; Mon, 16 Oct 2000 14:15:25 -0400
Received: from localhost (ashawley@localhost)
by gnu.uvm.edu (AIX4.3/UCB 8.8.8/8.8.7) with ESMTP id OAA66376
for <[email protected]>; Mon, 16 Oct 2000 14:15:25 -0400
Message-Id: <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2000 14:15:25 -0400 (EDT)
Sender: [email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
From: "Aaron S. Hawley" <[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Pine 4.21 feature not in PC-Pine 4.21?
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
X-Authentication-Warning: gnu.uvm.edu: ashawley owned process doing -bs
X-Sender: [email protected]
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN

it all depends how you have PC-Pine configured. can PC-Pine see your
Remote Folders? Does PC-Pine save sent-mail to a local Collection?

aaron

On Mon, 16 Oct 2000, Robert Larmon wrote:

>
> The feature I'm referring to is Pine's beginning of the month, move the
> sent-mail mailbox feature (I don't know the official name).
>
> Does PC-Pine have this feature to ask the user to move/delete the old
> sent-mail mailbox that Pine does? I'm finding that users using PC-Pine
> are bloating their sent-mail folder, and I'm trying to figure out a
> solution. Any ideas?
>
> Can anyone confirm this for me?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Robert

From [email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Mon, 16 Oct 2000 11:23:50 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id LAA24754;
Mon, 16 Oct 2000 11:23:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from list1.u.washington.edu ([email protected] [140.142.8.99])
by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id LAA17825;
Mon, 16 Oct 2000 11:23:48 -0700
Received: from host ([email protected] [140.142.56.13])
by list1.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id LAA34280;
Mon, 16 Oct 2000 11:23:02 -0700
Received: from mxu2.u.washington.edu (mxu2.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.9])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id LAA179532
for <[email protected]>; Mon, 16 Oct 2000 11:17:59 -0700
Received: from cfdlab.aero.iisc.ernet.in (IDENT:[email protected] [144.16.73.78])
by mxu2.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id LAA24911
for <[email protected]>; Mon, 16 Oct 2000 11:17:55 -0700
Received: from localhost (mohit@localhost)
by cfdlab.aero.iisc.ernet.in (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id e9GINEP08852
for <[email protected]>; Mon, 16 Oct 2000 23:53:14 +0530
Message-Id: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0010162349450.8804-100000@cfdlab.aero.iisc.ernet.in>
Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2000 23:53:13 +0530 (IST)
Sender: [email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
From: Mohit Agarwal <[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
Subject: Deleting attachments
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN

Hello:

I wasn't quite able to figure out how to delete a attachment from a mail
without deleting the mail itself. Any help!

Regards,
Mohit

--
-----------------------------------------------------------------
For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see:
http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/
-----------------------------------------------------------------

From [email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Mon, 16 Oct 2000 11:33:59 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.1])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id LAA18677;
Mon, 16 Oct 2000 11:33:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from list4.u.washington.edu ([email protected] [140.142.14.167])
by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id LAA03273;
Mon, 16 Oct 2000 11:33:57 -0700
Received: from host ([email protected] [140.142.56.13])
by list4.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id LAA30822;
Mon, 16 Oct 2000 11:32:16 -0700
Received: from mxu4.u.washington.edu (mxu4.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.8])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id LAA131358
for <[email protected]>; Mon, 16 Oct 2000 11:28:44 -0700
Received: from moose.uvm.edu (moose.uvm.edu [132.198.101.60])
by mxu4.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id LAA10618
for <[email protected]>; Mon, 16 Oct 2000 11:28:43 -0700
Received: from elk.uvm.edu (elk.uvm.edu [132.198.101.63])
by moose.uvm.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA57762
for <[email protected]>; Mon, 16 Oct 2000 14:28:41 -0400
Received: from localhost (ashawley@localhost)
by elk.uvm.edu (AIX4.3/UCB 8.8.8/8.8.7) with ESMTP id OAA46514
for <[email protected]>; Mon, 16 Oct 2000 14:28:41 -0400
Message-Id: <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2000 14:28:41 -0400 (EDT)
Sender: [email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
From: "Aaron S. Hawley" <[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Deleting attachments
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0010162349450.8804-100000@cfdlab.aero.iisc.ernet.in>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
X-Authentication-Warning: elk.uvm.edu: ashawley owned process doing -bs
X-Sender: [email protected]
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN

http://www.washington.edu/pine/faq/attachments.html#7.6

On Mon, 16 Oct 2000, Mohit Agarwal wrote:

> Hello:
>
> I wasn't quite able to figure out how to delete a attachment from a mail
> without deleting the mail itself. Any help!
>
> Regards,
> Mohit

From [email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Mon, 16 Oct 2000 11:35:49 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id LAA19898;
Mon, 16 Oct 2000 11:35:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from list2.u.washington.edu ([email protected] [140.142.14.165])
by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id LAA18255;
Mon, 16 Oct 2000 11:35:47 -0700
Received: from host ([email protected] [140.142.56.13])
by list2.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id LAA18730;
Mon, 16 Oct 2000 11:34:39 -0700
Received: from mxu4.u.washington.edu (mxu4.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.8])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id LAA52596
for <[email protected]>; Mon, 16 Oct 2000 11:30:28 -0700
Received: from evtvir02.tc.fluke.com (mail.fluke.com [206.138.179.200])
by mxu4.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id LAA10945
for <[email protected]>; Mon, 16 Oct 2000 11:30:27 -0700
Received: from evtvir02.tc.fluke.com ([129.196.184.22]) by evtvir02.tc.fluke.com with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2650.21)
id 4Z3CVA2N; Mon, 16 Oct 2000 11:27:41 -0700
Received: FROM dd BY evtvir02.tc.fluke.com ; Mon Oct 16 11:27:40 2000 -0700
Message-Id: <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2000 11:30:37 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: [email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
From: David Dyck <[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Deleting attachments
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0010162349450.8804-100000@cfdlab.aero.iisc.ernet.in>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-To: Mohit Agarwal <[email protected]>
X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN

On Mon, 16 Oct 2000, Mohit Agarwal wrote:

> I wasn't quite able to figure out how to delete a attachment from a mail
> without deleting the mail itself. Any help!

What I do is 'v'iew the message to get to
the ATTACHMENT INDEX,
type D to delete the attachment,
then save the whole message to the
same folder (INBOX). I get prompted
that the save won't save the attachment,
and after the new attachment-less message
appears in the folder, I expunge the
original

Does this help?
(maybe there is a better way)

From [email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Mon, 16 Oct 2000 11:37:20 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id LAA07044;
Mon, 16 Oct 2000 11:37:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from list3.u.washington.edu ([email protected] [140.142.8.100])
by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id LAA18312;
Mon, 16 Oct 2000 11:37:19 -0700
Received: from host ([email protected] [140.142.56.13])
by list3.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id LAA23948;
Mon, 16 Oct 2000 11:35:53 -0700
Received: from mxu3.u.washington.edu (mxu3.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.7])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id LAA111102
for <[email protected]>; Mon, 16 Oct 2000 11:31:21 -0700
Received: from law.usc.edu (law.usc.edu [128.125.42.6])
by mxu3.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id LAA05534
for <[email protected]>; Mon, 16 Oct 2000 11:31:20 -0700
Received: from l2122.usc.edu (l2122 [128.125.42.67])
by law.usc.edu (Pro-8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA20649;
Mon, 16 Oct 2000 11:36:30 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2000 11:30:47 -0700 (Pacific Daylight Time)
Sender: [email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
From: Robert Larmon <[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Pine 4.21 feature not in PC-Pine 4.21?
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-To: "Aaron S. Hawley" <[email protected]>
X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
X-X-Sender: [email protected]
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN

PC-Pine does see all the remote folders, and PC-Pine saves sent-mail only
to remote folders. We don't want it saving to local collection because
our faculty travel w/laptops a lot, and saving to local would limit access
to sent-mail when on the road.

Does that help?

RCL

On Mon, 16 Oct 2000, Aaron S. Hawley wrote:

> it all depends how you have PC-Pine configured. can PC-Pine see your
> Remote Folders? Does PC-Pine save sent-mail to a local Collection?
>
> aaron
>
> On Mon, 16 Oct 2000, Robert Larmon wrote:
>
> >
> > The feature I'm referring to is Pine's beginning of the month, move the
> > sent-mail mailbox feature (I don't know the official name).
> >
> > Does PC-Pine have this feature to ask the user to move/delete the old
> > sent-mail mailbox that Pine does? I'm finding that users using PC-Pine
> > are bloating their sent-mail folder, and I'm trying to figure out a
> > solution. Any ideas?
> >
> > Can anyone confirm this for me?
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Robert
>
>

```````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````
` Robert Larmon `
` PC Systems Analyst `
` USC Law School Computing Services `
` [email protected] `
'''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''

From [email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Mon, 16 Oct 2000 11:37:50 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id LAA32678;
Mon, 16 Oct 2000 11:37:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from list2.u.washington.edu ([email protected] [140.142.14.165])
by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id LAA18315;
Mon, 16 Oct 2000 11:37:48 -0700
Received: from host ([email protected] [140.142.56.13])
by list2.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id LAA18772;
Mon, 16 Oct 2000 11:37:04 -0700
Received: from mxu2.u.washington.edu (mxu2.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.9])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id LAA31876
for <[email protected]>; Mon, 16 Oct 2000 11:33:54 -0700
Received: from cfdlab.aero.iisc.ernet.in (IDENT:[email protected] [144.16.73.78])
by mxu2.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id LAA28400
for <[email protected]>; Mon, 16 Oct 2000 11:33:51 -0700
Received: from localhost (mohit@localhost)
by cfdlab.aero.iisc.ernet.in (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id e9GId2s08974;
Tue, 17 Oct 2000 00:09:02 +0530
Message-Id: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0010170007430.8960-100000@cfdlab.aero.iisc.ernet.in>
Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2000 00:09:02 +0530 (IST)
Sender: [email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
From: Mohit Agarwal <[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Deleting attachments
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-To: David Dyck <[email protected]>
X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN

I forgot to mention in the previous mail -- I'm aware that the messages having
attachments can be _saved_ to some folder (even the same folder!). But I
wanted to know whether there's a better way out.

On 2000-10-16, at 11:30 -0700, David Dyck wrote:

DD>
DD> What I do is 'v'iew the message to get to
DD> the ATTACHMENT INDEX,
DD> type D to delete the attachment,
DD> then save the whole message to the
DD> same folder (INBOX). I get prompted
DD> that the save won't save the attachment,
DD> and after the new attachment-less message
DD> appears in the folder, I expunge the
DD> original
DD>
DD> Does this help?
DD> (maybe there is a better way)
DD>

From [email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Mon, 16 Oct 2000 12:15:35 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id MAA08940;
Mon, 16 Oct 2000 12:15:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from list3.u.washington.edu ([email protected] [140.142.8.100])
by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id MAA19573;
Mon, 16 Oct 2000 12:15:33 -0700
Received: from host ([email protected] [140.142.56.13])
by list3.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id MAA41438;
Mon, 16 Oct 2000 12:14:46 -0700
Received: from bp15.u.washington.edu ([email protected] [140.142.15.205])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id MAA185458
for <[email protected]>; Mon, 16 Oct 2000 12:13:50 -0700
Received: from localhost (leibrand@localhost)
by bp15.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id MAA145482;
Mon, 16 Oct 2000 12:13:30 -0700
Message-Id: <Pine.A41.4.29.9999.0010161212180.132718-100000@bp15.u.washington.edu>
Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2000 12:13:30 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: [email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
From: Scott Leibrand <[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Deleting attachments
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0010170007430.8960-100000@cfdlab.aero.iisc.ernet.in>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-To: Mohit Agarwal <[email protected]>
X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
X-Sender: <[email protected]>
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN

On Tue, 17 Oct 2000, Mohit Agarwal wrote:

> I forgot to mention in the previous mail -- I'm aware that the messages having
> attachments can be _saved_ to some folder (even the same folder!). But I
> wanted to know whether there's a better way out.

That's the only way to do it within Pine. If you want you could also try
editting the mail folder file yourself (or writing a script to do it), but
you'll want to make backups first.

--
Scott Leibrand
[email protected] (Yes, that is a valid address.)
http://students.washington.edu/leibrand
http://www.nwlink.com/~leibrand
* RCW 19.190 notice: This email address is located in Washington State. *
* Unsolicited commercial email may be billed $500 per message. *

From [email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Mon, 16 Oct 2000 12:56:49 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id MAA00262;
Mon, 16 Oct 2000 12:56:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from list4.u.washington.edu ([email protected] [140.142.14.167])
by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id MAA20749;
Mon, 16 Oct 2000 12:56:47 -0700
Received: from host ([email protected] [140.142.56.13])
by list4.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id MAA22522;
Mon, 16 Oct 2000 12:55:22 -0700
Received: from mxu1.u.washington.edu (mxu1.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.8])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id MAA216596
for <[email protected]>; Mon, 16 Oct 2000 12:53:02 -0700
Received: from moose.uvm.edu (moose.uvm.edu [132.198.101.60])
by mxu1.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id MAA31357
for <[email protected]>; Mon, 16 Oct 2000 12:53:00 -0700
Received: from gnu.uvm.edu (gnu.uvm.edu [132.198.101.64])
by moose.uvm.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA66950
for <[email protected]>; Mon, 16 Oct 2000 15:52:55 -0400
Received: from localhost (ashawley@localhost)
by gnu.uvm.edu (AIX4.3/UCB 8.8.8/8.8.7) with ESMTP id PAA135470
for <[email protected]>; Mon, 16 Oct 2000 15:52:55 -0400
Message-Id: <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2000 15:52:54 -0400 (EDT)
Sender: [email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
From: "Aaron S. Hawley" <[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Pine 4.21 feature not in PC-Pine 4.21?
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
X-Authentication-Warning: gnu.uvm.edu: ashawley owned process doing -bs
X-Sender: [email protected]
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN

it does help.

there are other experts lurking around here, that can answer your
question. but what does the pruned-folders settin say in [S]etup
[C]onfig?

On Mon, 16 Oct 2000, Robert Larmon wrote:

> PC-Pine does see all the remote folders, and PC-Pine saves sent-mail
> only to remote folders. We don't want it saving to local collection
> because our faculty travel w/laptops a lot, and saving to local would
> limit access to sent-mail when on the road.
>
> Does that help?
>
> RCL
>
> On Mon, 16 Oct 2000, Aaron S. Hawley wrote:
>
> > it all depends how you have PC-Pine configured. can PC-Pine see your
> > Remote Folders? Does PC-Pine save sent-mail to a local Collection?
> >
> > aaron
> >
> > On Mon, 16 Oct 2000, Robert Larmon wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > The feature I'm referring to is Pine's beginning of the month, move the
> > > sent-mail mailbox feature (I don't know the official name).
> > >
> > > Does PC-Pine have this feature to ask the user to move/delete the old
> > > sent-mail mailbox that Pine does? I'm finding that users using PC-Pine
> > > are bloating their sent-mail folder, and I'm trying to figure out a
> > > solution. Any ideas?
> > >
> > > Can anyone confirm this for me?
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > >
> > > Robert

From [email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Mon, 16 Oct 2000 13:12:10 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.1])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id NAA01422;
Mon, 16 Oct 2000 13:12:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from list2.u.washington.edu ([email protected] [140.142.14.165])
by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id NAA06223;
Mon, 16 Oct 2000 13:12:09 -0700
Received: from host ([email protected] [140.142.56.13])
by list2.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id NAA20698;
Mon, 16 Oct 2000 13:10:32 -0700
Received: from mxu1.u.washington.edu (mxu1.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.8])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id NAA158856
for <[email protected]>; Mon, 16 Oct 2000 13:09:01 -0700
Received: from law.usc.edu (law.usc.edu [128.125.42.6])
by mxu1.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id NAA01995
for <[email protected]>; Mon, 16 Oct 2000 13:09:00 -0700
Received: from l2122.usc.edu (l2122 [128.125.42.67])
by law.usc.edu (Pro-8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA22536;
Mon, 16 Oct 2000 13:14:37 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2000 13:08:43 -0700 (Pacific Daylight Time)
Sender: [email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
From: Robert Larmon <[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Pine 4.21 feature not in PC-Pine 4.21?
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-To: "Aaron S. Hawley" <[email protected]>
X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
X-X-Sender: [email protected]
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN

no value set

On Mon, 16 Oct 2000, Aaron S. Hawley wrote:

> it does help.
>
> there are other experts lurking around here, that can answer your
> question. but what does the pruned-folders settin say in [S]etup
> [C]onfig?
>
> On Mon, 16 Oct 2000, Robert Larmon wrote:
>
> > PC-Pine does see all the remote folders, and PC-Pine saves sent-mail
> > only to remote folders. We don't want it saving to local collection
> > because our faculty travel w/laptops a lot, and saving to local would
> > limit access to sent-mail when on the road.
> >
> > Does that help?
> >
> > RCL
> >
> > On Mon, 16 Oct 2000, Aaron S. Hawley wrote:
> >
> > > it all depends how you have PC-Pine configured. can PC-Pine see your
> > > Remote Folders? Does PC-Pine save sent-mail to a local Collection?
> > >
> > > aaron
> > >
> > > On Mon, 16 Oct 2000, Robert Larmon wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > > The feature I'm referring to is Pine's beginning of the month, move the
> > > > sent-mail mailbox feature (I don't know the official name).
> > > >
> > > > Does PC-Pine have this feature to ask the user to move/delete the old
> > > > sent-mail mailbox that Pine does? I'm finding that users using PC-Pine
> > > > are bloating their sent-mail folder, and I'm trying to figure out a
> > > > solution. Any ideas?
> > > >
> > > > Can anyone confirm this for me?
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > >
> > > > Robert
>
>

```````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````
` Robert Larmon `
` PC Systems Analyst `
` USC Law School Computing Services `
` [email protected] `
'''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''

From [email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Mon, 16 Oct 2000 13:18:10 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id NAA10484;
Mon, 16 Oct 2000 13:18:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from list1.u.washington.edu ([email protected] [140.142.8.99])
by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id NAA21409;
Mon, 16 Oct 2000 13:18:09 -0700
Received: from host ([email protected] [140.142.56.13])
by list1.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id NAA37828;
Mon, 16 Oct 2000 13:16:40 -0700
Received: from mxu2.u.washington.edu (mxu2.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.9])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id NAA100730
for <[email protected]>; Mon, 16 Oct 2000 13:15:54 -0700
Received: from moose.uvm.edu (moose.uvm.edu [132.198.101.60])
by mxu2.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id NAA18279
for <[email protected]>; Mon, 16 Oct 2000 13:15:52 -0700
Received: from gnu.uvm.edu (gnu.uvm.edu [132.198.101.64])
by moose.uvm.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA25104
for <[email protected]>; Mon, 16 Oct 2000 16:15:50 -0400
Received: from localhost (ashawley@localhost)
by gnu.uvm.edu (AIX4.3/UCB 8.8.8/8.8.7) with ESMTP id QAA100904
for <[email protected]>; Mon, 16 Oct 2000 16:15:50 -0400
Message-Id: <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2000 16:15:50 -0400 (EDT)
Sender: [email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
From: "Aaron S. Hawley" <[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Pine 4.21 feature not in PC-Pine 4.21?
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
X-Authentication-Warning: gnu.uvm.edu: ashawley owned process doing -bs
X-Sender: [email protected]
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN

<no value set> is a good sign.

check your pinerc file to see what the following entry says:

last-time-prune-questioned=

On Mon, 16 Oct 2000, Robert Larmon wrote:
> no value set
>
> On Mon, 16 Oct 2000, Aaron S. Hawley wrote:
> > it does help.
> >
> > there are other experts lurking around here, that can answer your
> > question. but what does the pruned-folders settin say in [S]etup
> > [C]onfig?
> >
> > On Mon, 16 Oct 2000, Robert Larmon wrote:
> > > PC-Pine does see all the remote folders, and PC-Pine saves sent-mail
> > > only to remote folders. We don't want it saving to local collection
> > > because our faculty travel w/laptops a lot, and saving to local would
> > > limit access to sent-mail when on the road.
> > >
> > > Does that help?
> > >
> > > RCL
> > >
> > > On Mon, 16 Oct 2000, Aaron S. Hawley wrote:
> > > > it all depends how you have PC-Pine configured. can PC-Pine see your
> > > > Remote Folders? Does PC-Pine save sent-mail to a local Collection?
> > > >
> > > > aaron
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, 16 Oct 2000, Robert Larmon wrote:
> > > > > The feature I'm referring to is Pine's beginning of the month, move the
> > > > > sent-mail mailbox feature (I don't know the official name).
> > > > >
> > > > > Does PC-Pine have this feature to ask the user to move/delete the old
> > > > > sent-mail mailbox that Pine does? I'm finding that users using PC-Pine
> > > > > are bloating their sent-mail folder, and I'm trying to figure out a
> > > > > solution. Any ideas?
> > > > >
> > > > > Can anyone confirm this for me?
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks,
> > > > >
> > > > > Robert

From [email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Mon, 16 Oct 2000 13:22:36 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.1])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id NAA01721;
Mon, 16 Oct 2000 13:22:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from list3.u.washington.edu ([email protected] [140.142.8.100])
by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id NAA06547;
Mon, 16 Oct 2000 13:22:34 -0700
Received: from host ([email protected] [140.142.56.13])
by list3.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id NAA19252;
Mon, 16 Oct 2000 13:21:33 -0700
Received: from bp15.u.washington.edu ([email protected] [140.142.15.205])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id NAA135042
for <[email protected]>; Mon, 16 Oct 2000 13:20:29 -0700
Received: from localhost (leibrand@localhost)
by bp15.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id NAA209928
for <[email protected]>; Mon, 16 Oct 2000 13:20:29 -0700
Message-Id: <Pine.A41.4.29.9999.0010161318380.114114-100000@bp15.u.washington.edu>
Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2000 13:20:28 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: [email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
From: Scott Leibrand <[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Pine 4.21 feature not in PC-Pine 4.21?
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
X-Sender: <[email protected]>
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN

The proper value for last-time-prune-questioned is 100.10 (that's 100
years and 10 months since 1900). If the value is higher, set it to 100.10
or 100.9 (if you want to prune immediately instead of next month).

--
Scott Leibrand
[email protected] (Yes, that is a valid address.)
http://students.washington.edu/leibrand
http://www.nwlink.com/~leibrand
* RCW 19.190 notice: This email address is located in Washington State. *
* Unsolicited commercial email may be billed $500 per message. *

On Mon, 16 Oct 2000, Aaron S. Hawley wrote:

> <no value set> is a good sign.
>
> check your pinerc file to see what the following entry says:
>
> last-time-prune-questioned=
>
> On Mon, 16 Oct 2000, Robert Larmon wrote:
> > no value set
> >
> > On Mon, 16 Oct 2000, Aaron S. Hawley wrote:
> > > it does help.
> > >
> > > there are other experts lurking around here, that can answer your
> > > question. but what does the pruned-folders settin say in [S]etup
> > > [C]onfig?
> > >
> > > On Mon, 16 Oct 2000, Robert Larmon wrote:
> > > > PC-Pine does see all the remote folders, and PC-Pine saves sent-mail
> > > > only to remote folders. We don't want it saving to local collection
> > > > because our faculty travel w/laptops a lot, and saving to local would
> > > > limit access to sent-mail when on the road.
> > > >
> > > > Does that help?
> > > >
> > > > RCL
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, 16 Oct 2000, Aaron S. Hawley wrote:
> > > > > it all depends how you have PC-Pine configured. can PC-Pine see your
> > > > > Remote Folders? Does PC-Pine save sent-mail to a local Collection?
> > > > >
> > > > > aaron
> > > > >
> > > > > On Mon, 16 Oct 2000, Robert Larmon wrote:
> > > > > > The feature I'm referring to is Pine's beginning of the month, move the
> > > > > > sent-mail mailbox feature (I don't know the official name).
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Does PC-Pine have this feature to ask the user to move/delete the old
> > > > > > sent-mail mailbox that Pine does? I'm finding that users using PC-Pine
> > > > > > are bloating their sent-mail folder, and I'm trying to figure out a
> > > > > > solution. Any ideas?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Can anyone confirm this for me?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Robert
>
>

From [email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Mon, 16 Oct 2000 13:23:52 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id NAA03761;
Mon, 16 Oct 2000 13:23:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from list4.u.washington.edu ([email protected] [140.142.14.167])
by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id NAA21572;
Mon, 16 Oct 2000 13:23:50 -0700
Received: from host ([email protected] [140.142.56.13])
by list4.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id NAA25274;
Mon, 16 Oct 2000 13:23:04 -0700
Received: from mxu4.u.washington.edu (mxu4.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.8])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id NAA202960
for <[email protected]>; Mon, 16 Oct 2000 13:22:20 -0700
Received: from law.usc.edu (law.usc.edu [128.125.42.6])
by mxu4.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id NAA01321
for <[email protected]>; Mon, 16 Oct 2000 13:22:09 -0700
Received: from l2122.usc.edu (l2122 [128.125.42.67])
by law.usc.edu (Pro-8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA22991;
Mon, 16 Oct 2000 13:27:46 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2000 13:21:51 -0700 (Pacific Daylight Time)
Sender: [email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
From: Robert Larmon <[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Pine 4.21 feature not in PC-Pine 4.21?
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-To: "Aaron S. Hawley" <[email protected]>
X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
X-X-Sender: [email protected]
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN

it says 100.10.

On Mon, 16 Oct 2000, Aaron S. Hawley wrote:

> <no value set> is a good sign.
>
> check your pinerc file to see what the following entry says:
>
> last-time-prune-questioned=
>
> On Mon, 16 Oct 2000, Robert Larmon wrote:
> > no value set
> >
> > On Mon, 16 Oct 2000, Aaron S. Hawley wrote:
> > > it does help.
> > >
> > > there are other experts lurking around here, that can answer your
> > > question. but what does the pruned-folders settin say in [S]etup
> > > [C]onfig?
> > >
> > > On Mon, 16 Oct 2000, Robert Larmon wrote:
> > > > PC-Pine does see all the remote folders, and PC-Pine saves sent-mail
> > > > only to remote folders. We don't want it saving to local collection
> > > > because our faculty travel w/laptops a lot, and saving to local would
> > > > limit access to sent-mail when on the road.
> > > >
> > > > Does that help?
> > > >
> > > > RCL
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, 16 Oct 2000, Aaron S. Hawley wrote:
> > > > > it all depends how you have PC-Pine configured. can PC-Pine see your
> > > > > Remote Folders? Does PC-Pine save sent-mail to a local Collection?
> > > > >
> > > > > aaron
> > > > >
> > > > > On Mon, 16 Oct 2000, Robert Larmon wrote:
> > > > > > The feature I'm referring to is Pine's beginning of the month, move the
> > > > > > sent-mail mailbox feature (I don't know the official name).
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Does PC-Pine have this feature to ask the user to move/delete the old
> > > > > > sent-mail mailbox that Pine does? I'm finding that users using PC-Pine
> > > > > > are bloating their sent-mail folder, and I'm trying to figure out a
> > > > > > solution. Any ideas?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Can anyone confirm this for me?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Robert
>
>

```````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````
` Robert Larmon `
` PC Systems Analyst `
` USC Law School Computing Services `
` [email protected] `
'''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''

From [email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Mon, 16 Oct 2000 13:39:08 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.1])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id NAA03837;
Mon, 16 Oct 2000 13:39:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from list2.u.washington.edu ([email protected] [140.142.14.165])
by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id NAA06972;
Mon, 16 Oct 2000 13:39:06 -0700
Received: from host ([email protected] [140.142.56.13])
by list2.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id NAA16316;
Mon, 16 Oct 2000 13:36:33 -0700
Received: from bp15.u.washington.edu ([email protected] [140.142.15.205])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id NAA185476
for <[email protected]>; Mon, 16 Oct 2000 13:35:25 -0700
Received: from localhost (leibrand@localhost)
by bp15.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id NAA145628;
Mon, 16 Oct 2000 13:34:51 -0700
Message-Id: <Pine.A41.4.29.9999.0010161332490.114114-100000@bp15.u.washington.edu>
Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2000 13:34:50 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: [email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
From: Scott Leibrand <[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Pine 4.21 feature not in PC-Pine 4.21?
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-To: Robert Larmon <[email protected]>
X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
X-Sender: <[email protected]>
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN

I think the next step, then, is to do the following:

- Set last-time-prune-questioned to 100.9
- Start Pine with the -d 9 flag (pine -d 9)
- Once you get to the main menu, quit and examine the .pine-debug1 file.
Hopefully there'll be some information in there as to why it wasn't able
to prune your sent-mail folder.

--
Scott Leibrand
[email protected] (Yes, that is a valid address.)
http://students.washington.edu/leibrand
http://www.nwlink.com/~leibrand
* RCW 19.190 notice: This email address is located in Washington State. *
* Unsolicited commercial email may be billed $500 per message. *

On Mon, 16 Oct 2000, Robert Larmon wrote:

>
> it says 100.10.
>
> On Mon, 16 Oct 2000, Aaron S. Hawley wrote:
>
> > <no value set> is a good sign.
> >
> > check your pinerc file to see what the following entry says:
> >
> > last-time-prune-questioned=
> >
> > On Mon, 16 Oct 2000, Robert Larmon wrote:
> > > no value set
> > >
> > > On Mon, 16 Oct 2000, Aaron S. Hawley wrote:
> > > > it does help.
> > > >
> > > > there are other experts lurking around here, that can answer your
> > > > question. but what does the pruned-folders settin say in [S]etup
> > > > [C]onfig?
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, 16 Oct 2000, Robert Larmon wrote:
> > > > > PC-Pine does see all the remote folders, and PC-Pine saves sent-mail
> > > > > only to remote folders. We don't want it saving to local collection
> > > > > because our faculty travel w/laptops a lot, and saving to local would
> > > > > limit access to sent-mail when on the road.
> > > > >
> > > > > Does that help?
> > > > >
> > > > > RCL
> > > > >
> > > > > On Mon, 16 Oct 2000, Aaron S. Hawley wrote:
> > > > > > it all depends how you have PC-Pine configured. can PC-Pine see your
> > > > > > Remote Folders? Does PC-Pine save sent-mail to a local Collection?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > aaron
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Mon, 16 Oct 2000, Robert Larmon wrote:
> > > > > > > The feature I'm referring to is Pine's beginning of the month, move the
> > > > > > > sent-mail mailbox feature (I don't know the official name).
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Does PC-Pine have this feature to ask the user to move/delete the old
> > > > > > > sent-mail mailbox that Pine does? I'm finding that users using PC-Pine
> > > > > > > are bloating their sent-mail folder, and I'm trying to figure out a
> > > > > > > solution. Any ideas?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Can anyone confirm this for me?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Robert
> >
> >
>
>
>
> ```````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````
> ` Robert Larmon `
> ` PC Systems Analyst `
> ` USC Law School Computing Services `
> ` [email protected] `
> '''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''
>
>

From [email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Mon, 16 Oct 2000 14:04:13 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id OAA06681;
Mon, 16 Oct 2000 14:04:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from list4.u.washington.edu ([email protected] [140.142.14.167])
by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id OAA22811;
Mon, 16 Oct 2000 14:04:11 -0700
Received: from host ([email protected] [140.142.56.13])
by list4.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id OAA22290;
Mon, 16 Oct 2000 14:03:06 -0700
Received: from mxu3.u.washington.edu (mxu3.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.7])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id OAA163958
for <[email protected]>; Mon, 16 Oct 2000 14:02:19 -0700
Received: from law.usc.edu (law.usc.edu [128.125.42.6])
by mxu3.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id OAA03641;
Mon, 16 Oct 2000 14:02:19 -0700
Received: from l2122.usc.edu (l2122 [128.125.42.67])
by law.usc.edu (Pro-8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA23806;
Mon, 16 Oct 2000 14:07:58 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2000 14:02:13 -0700 (Pacific Daylight Time)
Sender: [email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
From: Robert Larmon <[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Pine 4.21 feature not in PC-Pine 4.21?
In-Reply-To: <Pine.A41.4.29.9999.0010161332490.114114-100000@bp15.u.washington.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-To: Scott Leibrand <[email protected]>
X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
X-X-Sender: [email protected]
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN

Okay, tried that. Here's what I think is the output in question...

13:47:02
==== expire_mail called ====

13:47:02
Current month 24009

13:47:02
---- write_pinerc ----

13:47:02
write_pinerc: pinerc_written = 971729224

This section seems to call what I think is the correct function. I still
don't get a prompt. I am going to try using the pruned-folders right now
to see if that helps at all. Just a reminder, this does work in regular
4.21, just not PC-Pine 4.21. Any other suggestions or areas in the pine
debug file?

Thanks,

Robert

On Mon, 16 Oct 2000, Scott Leibrand wrote:

> I think the next step, then, is to do the following:
>
> - Set last-time-prune-questioned to 100.9
> - Start Pine with the -d 9 flag (pine -d 9)
> - Once you get to the main menu, quit and examine the .pine-debug1 file.
> Hopefully there'll be some information in there as to why it wasn't able
> to prune your sent-mail folder.
>
> --
> Scott Leibrand
> [email protected] (Yes, that is a valid address.)
> http://students.washington.edu/leibrand
> http://www.nwlink.com/~leibrand
> * RCW 19.190 notice: This email address is located in Washington State. *
> * Unsolicited commercial email may be billed $500 per message. *
>
> On Mon, 16 Oct 2000, Robert Larmon wrote:
>
> >
> > it says 100.10.
> >
> > On Mon, 16 Oct 2000, Aaron S. Hawley wrote:
> >
> > > <no value set> is a good sign.
> > >
> > > check your pinerc file to see what the following entry says:
> > >
> > > last-time-prune-questioned=
> > >
> > > On Mon, 16 Oct 2000, Robert Larmon wrote:
> > > > no value set
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, 16 Oct 2000, Aaron S. Hawley wrote:
> > > > > it does help.
> > > > >
> > > > > there are other experts lurking around here, that can answer your
> > > > > question. but what does the pruned-folders settin say in [S]etup
> > > > > [C]onfig?
> > > > >
> > > > > On Mon, 16 Oct 2000, Robert Larmon wrote:
> > > > > > PC-Pine does see all the remote folders, and PC-Pine saves sent-mail
> > > > > > only to remote folders. We don't want it saving to local collection
> > > > > > because our faculty travel w/laptops a lot, and saving to local would
> > > > > > limit access to sent-mail when on the road.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Does that help?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > RCL
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Mon, 16 Oct 2000, Aaron S. Hawley wrote:
> > > > > > > it all depends how you have PC-Pine configured. can PC-Pine see your
> > > > > > > Remote Folders? Does PC-Pine save sent-mail to a local Collection?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > aaron
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Mon, 16 Oct 2000, Robert Larmon wrote:
> > > > > > > > The feature I'm referring to is Pine's beginning of the month, move the
> > > > > > > > sent-mail mailbox feature (I don't know the official name).
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Does PC-Pine have this feature to ask the user to move/delete the old
> > > > > > > > sent-mail mailbox that Pine does? I'm finding that users using PC-Pine
> > > > > > > > are bloating their sent-mail folder, and I'm trying to figure out a
> > > > > > > > solution. Any ideas?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Can anyone confirm this for me?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Robert
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > ```````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````
> > ` Robert Larmon `
> > ` PC Systems Analyst `
> > ` USC Law School Computing Services `
> > ` [email protected] `
> > '''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''
> >
> >
>
>

```````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````
` Robert Larmon `
` PC Systems Analyst `
` USC Law School Computing Services `
` [email protected] `
'''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''

From [email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Mon, 16 Oct 2000 14:30:42 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.1])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id OAA24925;
Mon, 16 Oct 2000 14:30:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from list4.u.washington.edu ([email protected] [140.142.14.167])
by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id OAA08871;
Mon, 16 Oct 2000 14:30:40 -0700
Received: from host ([email protected] [140.142.56.13])
by list4.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id OAA16614;
Mon, 16 Oct 2000 14:29:26 -0700
Received: from bp15.u.washington.edu ([email protected] [140.142.15.205])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id OAA205330
for <[email protected]>; Mon, 16 Oct 2000 14:28:37 -0700
Received: from localhost (leibrand@localhost)
by bp15.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id OAA224620;
Mon, 16 Oct 2000 14:28:04 -0700
Message-Id: <Pine.A41.4.29.9999.0010161419070.114114-100000@bp15.u.washington.edu>
Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2000 14:28:04 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: [email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
From: Scott Leibrand <[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Pine 4.21 feature not in PC-Pine 4.21?
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-To: Robert Larmon <[email protected]>
X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
X-Sender: <[email protected]>
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN

I'm not sure what the 24009 means, but it could mean your system's date is
wrong. Check to make sure it's still October 2000.

--
Scott Leibrand
[email protected] (Yes, that is a valid address.)
http://students.washington.edu/leibrand
http://www.nwlink.com/~leibrand
* RCW 19.190 notice: This email address is located in Washington State. *
* Unsolicited commercial email may be billed $500 per message. *

On Mon, 16 Oct 2000, Robert Larmon wrote:

>
> Okay, tried that. Here's what I think is the output in question...
>
> 13:47:02
> ==== expire_mail called ====
>
> 13:47:02
> Current month 24009
>
> 13:47:02
> ---- write_pinerc ----
>
> 13:47:02
> write_pinerc: pinerc_written = 971729224
>
>
> This section seems to call what I think is the correct function. I still
> don't get a prompt. I am going to try using the pruned-folders right now
> to see if that helps at all. Just a reminder, this does work in regular
> 4.21, just not PC-Pine 4.21. Any other suggestions or areas in the pine
> debug file?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Robert
>
> On Mon, 16 Oct 2000, Scott Leibrand wrote:
>
> > I think the next step, then, is to do the following:
> >
> > - Set last-time-prune-questioned to 100.9
> > - Start Pine with the -d 9 flag (pine -d 9)
> > - Once you get to the main menu, quit and examine the .pine-debug1 file.
> > Hopefully there'll be some information in there as to why it wasn't able
> > to prune your sent-mail folder.
> >
> > --
> > Scott Leibrand
> > [email protected] (Yes, that is a valid address.)
> > http://students.washington.edu/leibrand
> > http://www.nwlink.com/~leibrand
> > * RCW 19.190 notice: This email address is located in Washington State. *
> > * Unsolicited commercial email may be billed $500 per message. *
> >
> > On Mon, 16 Oct 2000, Robert Larmon wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > it says 100.10.
> > >
> > > On Mon, 16 Oct 2000, Aaron S. Hawley wrote:
> > >
> > > > <no value set> is a good sign.
> > > >
> > > > check your pinerc file to see what the following entry says:
> > > >
> > > > last-time-prune-questioned=
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, 16 Oct 2000, Robert Larmon wrote:
> > > > > no value set
> > > > >
> > > > > On Mon, 16 Oct 2000, Aaron S. Hawley wrote:
> > > > > > it does help.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > there are other experts lurking around here, that can answer your
> > > > > > question. but what does the pruned-folders settin say in [S]etup
> > > > > > [C]onfig?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Mon, 16 Oct 2000, Robert Larmon wrote:
> > > > > > > PC-Pine does see all the remote folders, and PC-Pine saves sent-mail
> > > > > > > only to remote folders. We don't want it saving to local collection
> > > > > > > because our faculty travel w/laptops a lot, and saving to local would
> > > > > > > limit access to sent-mail when on the road.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Does that help?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > RCL
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Mon, 16 Oct 2000, Aaron S. Hawley wrote:
> > > > > > > > it all depends how you have PC-Pine configured. can PC-Pine see your
> > > > > > > > Remote Folders? Does PC-Pine save sent-mail to a local Collection?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > aaron
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On Mon, 16 Oct 2000, Robert Larmon wrote:
> > > > > > > > > The feature I'm referring to is Pine's beginning of the month, move the
> > > > > > > > > sent-mail mailbox feature (I don't know the official name).
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Does PC-Pine have this feature to ask the user to move/delete the old
> > > > > > > > > sent-mail mailbox that Pine does? I'm finding that users using PC-Pine
> > > > > > > > > are bloating their sent-mail folder, and I'm trying to figure out a
> > > > > > > > > solution. Any ideas?
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Can anyone confirm this for me?
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Robert
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ```````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````
> > > ` Robert Larmon `
> > > ` PC Systems Analyst `
> > > ` USC Law School Computing Services `
> > > ` [email protected] `
> > > '''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
>
> ```````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````
> ` Robert Larmon `
> ` PC Systems Analyst `
> ` USC Law School Computing Services `
> ` [email protected] `
> '''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''
>
>

From [email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Mon, 16 Oct 2000 14:33:00 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.1])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id OAA26164;
Mon, 16 Oct 2000 14:32:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from list1.u.washington.edu ([email protected] [140.142.8.99])
by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id OAA08954;
Mon, 16 Oct 2000 14:32:59 -0700
Received: from host ([email protected] [140.142.56.13])
by list1.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id OAA42410;
Mon, 16 Oct 2000 14:31:31 -0700
Received: from mxu4.u.washington.edu (mxu4.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.8])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id OAA161596
for <[email protected]>; Mon, 16 Oct 2000 14:30:49 -0700
Received: from law.usc.edu (law.usc.edu [128.125.42.6])
by mxu4.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id OAA15670;
Mon, 16 Oct 2000 14:30:48 -0700
Received: from l2122.usc.edu (l2122 [128.125.42.67])
by law.usc.edu (Pro-8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA24355;
Mon, 16 Oct 2000 14:36:28 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2000 14:30:41 -0700 (Pacific Daylight Time)
Sender: [email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
From: Robert Larmon <[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Pine 4.21 feature not in PC-Pine 4.21?
In-Reply-To: <Pine.A41.4.29.9999.0010161419070.114114-100000@bp15.u.washington.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-To: Scott Leibrand <[email protected]>
X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
X-X-Sender: [email protected]
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN

Yep, it says Oct 16th, 2000. (Win98SE, all critical/security/etc patches
except IE 5.5)

On Mon, 16 Oct 2000, Scott Leibrand wrote:

> I'm not sure what the 24009 means, but it could mean your system's date is
> wrong. Check to make sure it's still October 2000.
>
> --
> Scott Leibrand
> [email protected] (Yes, that is a valid address.)
> http://students.washington.edu/leibrand
> http://www.nwlink.com/~leibrand
> * RCW 19.190 notice: This email address is located in Washington State. *
> * Unsolicited commercial email may be billed $500 per message. *
>
> On Mon, 16 Oct 2000, Robert Larmon wrote:
>
> >
> > Okay, tried that. Here's what I think is the output in question...
> >
> > 13:47:02
> > ==== expire_mail called ====
> >
> > 13:47:02
> > Current month 24009
> >
> > 13:47:02
> > ---- write_pinerc ----
> >
> > 13:47:02
> > write_pinerc: pinerc_written = 971729224
> >
> >
> > This section seems to call what I think is the correct function. I still
> > don't get a prompt. I am going to try using the pruned-folders right now
> > to see if that helps at all. Just a reminder, this does work in regular
> > 4.21, just not PC-Pine 4.21. Any other suggestions or areas in the pine
> > debug file?
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Robert
> >
> > On Mon, 16 Oct 2000, Scott Leibrand wrote:
> >
> > > I think the next step, then, is to do the following:
> > >
> > > - Set last-time-prune-questioned to 100.9
> > > - Start Pine with the -d 9 flag (pine -d 9)
> > > - Once you get to the main menu, quit and examine the .pine-debug1 file.
> > > Hopefully there'll be some information in there as to why it wasn't able
> > > to prune your sent-mail folder.
> > >
> > > --
> > > Scott Leibrand
> > > [email protected] (Yes, that is a valid address.)
> > > http://students.washington.edu/leibrand
> > > http://www.nwlink.com/~leibrand
> > > * RCW 19.190 notice: This email address is located in Washington State. *
> > > * Unsolicited commercial email may be billed $500 per message. *
> > >
> > > On Mon, 16 Oct 2000, Robert Larmon wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > > it says 100.10.
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, 16 Oct 2000, Aaron S. Hawley wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > <no value set> is a good sign.
> > > > >
> > > > > check your pinerc file to see what the following entry says:
> > > > >
> > > > > last-time-prune-questioned=
> > > > >
> > > > > On Mon, 16 Oct 2000, Robert Larmon wrote:
> > > > > > no value set
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Mon, 16 Oct 2000, Aaron S. Hawley wrote:
> > > > > > > it does help.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > there are other experts lurking around here, that can answer your
> > > > > > > question. but what does the pruned-folders settin say in [S]etup
> > > > > > > [C]onfig?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Mon, 16 Oct 2000, Robert Larmon wrote:
> > > > > > > > PC-Pine does see all the remote folders, and PC-Pine saves sent-mail
> > > > > > > > only to remote folders. We don't want it saving to local collection
> > > > > > > > because our faculty travel w/laptops a lot, and saving to local would
> > > > > > > > limit access to sent-mail when on the road.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Does that help?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > RCL
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On Mon, 16 Oct 2000, Aaron S. Hawley wrote:
> > > > > > > > > it all depends how you have PC-Pine configured. can PC-Pine see your
> > > > > > > > > Remote Folders? Does PC-Pine save sent-mail to a local Collection?
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > aaron
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > On Mon, 16 Oct 2000, Robert Larmon wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > The feature I'm referring to is Pine's beginning of the month, move the
> > > > > > > > > > sent-mail mailbox feature (I don't know the official name).
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Does PC-Pine have this feature to ask the user to move/delete the old
> > > > > > > > > > sent-mail mailbox that Pine does? I'm finding that users using PC-Pine
> > > > > > > > > > are bloating their sent-mail folder, and I'm trying to figure out a
> > > > > > > > > > solution. Any ideas?
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Can anyone confirm this for me?
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Robert
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > ```````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````
> > > > ` Robert Larmon `
> > > > ` PC Systems Analyst `
> > > > ` USC Law School Computing Services `
> > > > ` [email protected] `
> > > > '''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > ```````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````
> > ` Robert Larmon `
> > ` PC Systems Analyst `
> > ` USC Law School Computing Services `
> > ` [email protected] `
> > '''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''
> >
> >
>
>
>

```````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````
` Robert Larmon `
` PC Systems Analyst `
` USC Law School Computing Services `
` [email protected] `
'''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''

From [email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Mon, 16 Oct 2000 14:34:01 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.1])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id OAA00304;
Mon, 16 Oct 2000 14:34:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from list3.u.washington.edu ([email protected] [140.142.8.100])
by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id OAA08995;
Mon, 16 Oct 2000 14:34:00 -0700
Received: from host ([email protected] [140.142.56.13])
by list3.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id OAA42016;
Mon, 16 Oct 2000 14:33:20 -0700
Received: from bp15.u.washington.edu ([email protected] [140.142.15.205])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id OAA158954
for <[email protected]>; Mon, 16 Oct 2000 14:32:25 -0700
Received: from localhost (leibrand@localhost)
by bp15.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id OAA219734;
Mon, 16 Oct 2000 14:32:23 -0700
Message-Id: <Pine.A41.4.29.9999.0010161431420.241164-100000@bp15.u.washington.edu>
Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2000 14:32:23 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: [email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
From: Scott Leibrand <[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Pine 4.21 feature not in PC-Pine 4.21?
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-To: Robert Larmon <[email protected]>
X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
X-Sender: <[email protected]>
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN

Ok. I can't think of anything else. Someone else's turn.

--
Scott Leibrand
[email protected] (Yes, that is a valid address.)
http://students.washington.edu/leibrand
http://www.nwlink.com/~leibrand
* RCW 19.190 notice: This email address is located in Washington State. *
* Unsolicited commercial email may be billed $500 per message. *

On Mon, 16 Oct 2000, Robert Larmon wrote:

>
> Yep, it says Oct 16th, 2000. (Win98SE, all critical/security/etc patches
> except IE 5.5)

From [email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Mon, 16 Oct 2000 14:40:08 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id OAA14450;
Mon, 16 Oct 2000 14:40:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from list2.u.washington.edu ([email protected] [140.142.14.165])
by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id OAA24224;
Mon, 16 Oct 2000 14:40:06 -0700
Received: from host ([email protected] [140.142.56.13])
by list2.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id OAA40458;
Mon, 16 Oct 2000 14:39:13 -0700
Received: from mxu3.u.washington.edu (mxu3.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.7])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id OAA111072
for <[email protected]>; Mon, 16 Oct 2000 14:38:25 -0700
Received: from localhost.edlund.org (m96.ryd.student.liu.se [130.236.214.96])
by mxu3.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id OAA11598
for <[email protected]>; Mon, 16 Oct 2000 14:38:24 -0700
Received: by localhost.edlund.org (Postfix, from userid 500)
id C945241052; Mon, 16 Oct 2000 23:38:19 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by localhost.edlund.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
id C274741051; Mon, 16 Oct 2000 23:38:19 +0200 (CEST)
Message-Id: <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2000 23:38:19 +0200 (CEST)
Sender: [email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
From: Henrik Edlund <[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Pine 4.21 feature not in PC-Pine 4.21?
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-To: Robert Larmon <[email protected]>
X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN

24009 months equals the number of months from 0000-00-00 until 2000-09-30.

On Mon, 16 Oct 2000, Robert Larmon wrote:

>
> Yep, it says Oct 16th, 2000. (Win98SE, all critical/security/etc patches
> except IE 5.5)
>
> On Mon, 16 Oct 2000, Scott Leibrand wrote:
>
> > I'm not sure what the 24009 means, but it could mean your system's date is
> > wrong. Check to make sure it's still October 2000.
> >
> > --
> > Scott Leibrand
> > [email protected] (Yes, that is a valid address.)
> > http://students.washington.edu/leibrand
> > http://www.nwlink.com/~leibrand
> > * RCW 19.190 notice: This email address is located in Washington State. *
> > * Unsolicited commercial email may be billed $500 per message. *
> >
> > On Mon, 16 Oct 2000, Robert Larmon wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > Okay, tried that. Here's what I think is the output in question...
> > >
> > > 13:47:02
> > > ==== expire_mail called ====
> > >
> > > 13:47:02
> > > Current month 24009
> > >
> > > 13:47:02
> > > ---- write_pinerc ----
> > >
> > > 13:47:02
> > > write_pinerc: pinerc_written = 971729224
> > >
> > >
> > > This section seems to call what I think is the correct function. I still
> > > don't get a prompt. I am going to try using the pruned-folders right now
> > > to see if that helps at all. Just a reminder, this does work in regular
> > > 4.21, just not PC-Pine 4.21. Any other suggestions or areas in the pine
> > > debug file?
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > >
> > > Robert
> > >
> > > On Mon, 16 Oct 2000, Scott Leibrand wrote:
> > >
> > > > I think the next step, then, is to do the following:
> > > >
> > > > - Set last-time-prune-questioned to 100.9
> > > > - Start Pine with the -d 9 flag (pine -d 9)
> > > > - Once you get to the main menu, quit and examine the .pine-debug1 file.
> > > > Hopefully there'll be some information in there as to why it wasn't able
> > > > to prune your sent-mail folder.
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Scott Leibrand
> > > > [email protected] (Yes, that is a valid address.)
> > > > http://students.washington.edu/leibrand
> > > > http://www.nwlink.com/~leibrand
> > > > * RCW 19.190 notice: This email address is located in Washington State. *
> > > > * Unsolicited commercial email may be billed $500 per message. *
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, 16 Oct 2000, Robert Larmon wrote:
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > it says 100.10.
> > > > >
> > > > > On Mon, 16 Oct 2000, Aaron S. Hawley wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > <no value set> is a good sign.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > check your pinerc file to see what the following entry says:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > last-time-prune-questioned=
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Mon, 16 Oct 2000, Robert Larmon wrote:
> > > > > > > no value set
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Mon, 16 Oct 2000, Aaron S. Hawley wrote:
> > > > > > > > it does help.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > there are other experts lurking around here, that can answer your
> > > > > > > > question. but what does the pruned-folders settin say in [S]etup
> > > > > > > > [C]onfig?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On Mon, 16 Oct 2000, Robert Larmon wrote:
> > > > > > > > > PC-Pine does see all the remote folders, and PC-Pine saves sent-mail
> > > > > > > > > only to remote folders. We don't want it saving to local collection
> > > > > > > > > because our faculty travel w/laptops a lot, and saving to local would
> > > > > > > > > limit access to sent-mail when on the road.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Does that help?
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > RCL
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > On Mon, 16 Oct 2000, Aaron S. Hawley wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > it all depends how you have PC-Pine configured. can PC-Pine see your
> > > > > > > > > > Remote Folders? Does PC-Pine save sent-mail to a local Collection?
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > aaron
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > On Mon, 16 Oct 2000, Robert Larmon wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > The feature I'm referring to is Pine's beginning of the month, move the
> > > > > > > > > > > sent-mail mailbox feature (I don't know the official name).
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Does PC-Pine have this feature to ask the user to move/delete the old
> > > > > > > > > > > sent-mail mailbox that Pine does? I'm finding that users using PC-Pine
> > > > > > > > > > > are bloating their sent-mail folder, and I'm trying to figure out a
> > > > > > > > > > > solution. Any ideas?
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Can anyone confirm this for me?
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Robert
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > ```````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````
> > > > > ` Robert Larmon `
> > > > > ` PC Systems Analyst `
> > > > > ` USC Law School Computing Services `
> > > > > ` [email protected] `
> > > > > '''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ```````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````
> > > ` Robert Larmon `
> > > ` PC Systems Analyst `
> > > ` USC Law School Computing Services `
> > > ` [email protected] `
> > > '''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
> ```````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````
> ` Robert Larmon `
> ` PC Systems Analyst `
> ` USC Law School Computing Services `
> ` [email protected] `
> '''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''
>
>

--
Henrik Edlund (HE2914-RIPE)
http://www.edlund.org/

"You're full of shit, you know that? There's a toilet over there."
-- Yuen (Tequila), "Lashou shentan" ("Hard-Boiled")

From [email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Mon, 16 Oct 2000 14:50:18 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.1])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id OAA27454;
Mon, 16 Oct 2000 14:50:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from list3.u.washington.edu ([email protected] [140.142.8.100])
by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id OAA09649;
Mon, 16 Oct 2000 14:50:16 -0700
Received: from host ([email protected] [140.142.56.13])
by list3.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id OAA24040;
Mon, 16 Oct 2000 14:49:24 -0700
Received: from mxu3.u.washington.edu (mxu3.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.7])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id OAA52594
for <[email protected]>; Mon, 16 Oct 2000 14:48:35 -0700
Received: from law.usc.edu (law.usc.edu [128.125.42.6])
by mxu3.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id OAA13776
for <[email protected]>; Mon, 16 Oct 2000 14:48:35 -0700
Received: from l2122.usc.edu (l2122 [128.125.42.67])
by law.usc.edu (Pro-8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA24849
for <[email protected]>; Mon, 16 Oct 2000 14:54:14 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2000 14:48:25 -0700 (Pacific Daylight Time)
Sender: [email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
From: Robert Larmon <[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Pine 4.21 feature not in PC-Pine 4.21?
In-Reply-To: <Pine.A41.4.29.9999.0010161431420.241164-100000@bp15.u.washington.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
X-X-Sender: [email protected]
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN

Just one more thing, typing in sent-mail in the pruned folder list does
work in PC-Pine, although I don't think that's how it's meant to
work. Unless anyone has any other insight, should this be submitted as a
bug?

RCL

On Mon, 16 Oct 2000, Scott Leibrand wrote:

> Ok. I can't think of anything else. Someone else's turn.
>
> --
> Scott Leibrand
> [email protected] (Yes, that is a valid address.)
> http://students.washington.edu/leibrand
> http://www.nwlink.com/~leibrand
> * RCW 19.190 notice: This email address is located in Washington State. *
> * Unsolicited commercial email may be billed $500 per message. *
>
> On Mon, 16 Oct 2000, Robert Larmon wrote:
>
> >
> > Yep, it says Oct 16th, 2000. (Win98SE, all critical/security/etc patches
> > except IE 5.5)
>
>

```````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````
` Robert Larmon `
` PC Systems Analyst `
` USC Law School Computing Services `
` [email protected] `
'''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''

From [email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Mon, 16 Oct 2000 14:51:17 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id OAA31181;
Mon, 16 Oct 2000 14:51:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from list3.u.washington.edu ([email protected] [140.142.8.100])
by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id OAA24659;
Mon, 16 Oct 2000 14:51:15 -0700
Received: from host ([email protected] [140.142.56.13])
by list3.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id OAA23812;
Mon, 16 Oct 2000 14:50:24 -0700
Received: from mxu4.u.washington.edu (mxu4.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.8])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id OAA79026
for <[email protected]>; Mon, 16 Oct 2000 14:49:17 -0700
Received: from moose.uvm.edu (moose.uvm.edu [132.198.101.60])
by mxu4.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id OAA19803
for <[email protected]>; Mon, 16 Oct 2000 14:49:15 -0700
Received: from gnu.uvm.edu (gnu.uvm.edu [132.198.101.64])
by moose.uvm.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA110134
for <[email protected]>; Mon, 16 Oct 2000 17:49:04 -0400
Received: from localhost (ashawley@localhost)
by gnu.uvm.edu (AIX4.3/UCB 8.8.8/8.8.7) with ESMTP id RAA185890
for <[email protected]>; Mon, 16 Oct 2000 17:49:04 -0400
Message-Id: <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2000 17:49:04 -0400 (EDT)
Sender: [email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
From: "Aaron S. Hawley" <[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Pine 4.21 feature not in PC-Pine 4.21?
In-Reply-To: <Pine.A41.4.29.9999.0010161431420.241164-100000@bp15.u.washington.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
X-Authentication-Warning: gnu.uvm.edu: ashawley owned process doing -bs
X-Sender: [email protected]
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN

back to the folder collections strategy:

how many folder collections do you have?

aaron

On Mon, 16 Oct 2000, Scott Leibrand wrote:

> Ok. I can't think of anything else. Someone else's turn.

From [email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Mon, 16 Oct 2000 15:02:10 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id PAA09422;
Mon, 16 Oct 2000 15:02:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from list4.u.washington.edu ([email protected] [140.142.14.167])
by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id PAA25117;
Mon, 16 Oct 2000 15:02:08 -0700
Received: from host ([email protected] [140.142.56.13])
by list4.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id PAA26836;
Mon, 16 Oct 2000 15:01:20 -0700
Received: from mxu2.u.washington.edu (mxu2.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.9])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id OAA172992
for <[email protected]>; Mon, 16 Oct 2000 14:59:23 -0700
Received: from law.usc.edu (law.usc.edu [128.125.42.6])
by mxu2.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id OAA07445
for <[email protected]>; Mon, 16 Oct 2000 14:59:22 -0700
Received: from l2122.usc.edu (l2122 [128.125.42.67])
by law.usc.edu (Pro-8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA25120;
Mon, 16 Oct 2000 15:05:00 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2000 14:59:10 -0700 (Pacific Daylight Time)
Sender: [email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
From: Robert Larmon <[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Pine 4.21 feature not in PC-Pine 4.21?
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-To: "Aaron S. Hawley" <[email protected]>
X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
X-X-Sender: [email protected]
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN

I have an incoming folder collection and a saved mail folder collection.
I just started a third collection this month (local), so that should have
no bearing on the case. The inbox is separated from the saved mail
folders.

RCL

On Mon, 16 Oct 2000, Aaron S. Hawley wrote:

> back to the folder collections strategy:
>
> how many folder collections do you have?
>
> aaron
>
> On Mon, 16 Oct 2000, Scott Leibrand wrote:
>
> > Ok. I can't think of anything else. Someone else's turn.
>
>

```````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````
` Robert Larmon `
` PC Systems Analyst `
` USC Law School Computing Services `
` [email protected] `
'''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''

From [email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Tue, 17 Oct 2000 07:02:10 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id HAA13166;
Tue, 17 Oct 2000 07:02:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from list2.u.washington.edu ([email protected] [140.142.14.165])
by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id HAA13559;
Tue, 17 Oct 2000 07:02:05 -0700
Received: from host ([email protected] [140.142.56.13])
by list2.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id HAA36548;
Tue, 17 Oct 2000 07:01:16 -0700
Received: from mxu3.u.washington.edu (mxu3.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.7])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id GAA212552
for <[email protected]>; Tue, 17 Oct 2000 06:59:15 -0700
Received: from skippy.hhnt.org.uk (skippy.hhnt.org.uk [193.32.22.91])
by mxu3.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id GAA27591
for <[email protected]>; Tue, 17 Oct 2000 06:59:14 -0700
Received: from agent-cxh (unverified) by skippy.hhnt.org.uk
(Content Technologies SMTPRS 4.1.5) with SMTP id <[email protected]> for <[email protected]>;
Tue, 17 Oct 2000 15:12:01 +0100
Received: from HHT-Message_Server by agent-cxh
with Novell_GroupWise; Tue, 17 Oct 2000 14:57:28 +0100
Message-Id: <s9ec68d8.026@agent-cxh>
Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2000 14:57:17 +0100
Sender: [email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
From: "Bridget Nichols" <[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
Subject: addressee taken from file
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
X-To: <[email protected]>
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN

Is it possible to use pine from the command line with the addressee's name =
in a text file as follows:

pine -I^X,y -subject "hello" < ban

where the file ban contains the addressee name [email protected]?=20

This does not work as I have written above either with < or <<...

**********************************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and=20
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they =20
are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify=20
your email system administrator.

This footnote also confirms that this email message has been checked
for the presence of computer viruses.
**********************************************************************
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------
For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see:
http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/
-----------------------------------------------------------------

From [email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Tue, 17 Oct 2000 08:03:08 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id IAA13368;
Tue, 17 Oct 2000 08:03:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from list4.u.washington.edu ([email protected] [140.142.14.167])
by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id IAA15064;
Tue, 17 Oct 2000 08:03:06 -0700
Received: from host ([email protected] [140.142.56.13])
by list4.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id IAA15754;
Tue, 17 Oct 2000 08:02:03 -0700
Received: from mxu1.u.washington.edu (mxu1.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.8])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id HAA111008
for <[email protected]>; Tue, 17 Oct 2000 07:59:15 -0700
Received: from gort.office.aol.com (pix-fw.wan.aol.com [152.163.190.1])
by mxu1.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id HAA18165
for <[email protected]>; Tue, 17 Oct 2000 07:59:15 -0700
Received: from DBPETE (nikto [10.2.107.233]) by gort.office.aol.com with ESMTP (8.7.1/8.7.1) id KAA08537 for <[email protected]>; Tue, 17 Oct 2000 10:59:11 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2000 10:59:10 -0400 (Eastern Daylight Time)
Sender: [email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
From: Dan Peterson <[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
Subject: HTML mode
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-X-Sender: [email protected]
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN

I frequently receive email that's in HTML format, but the email client
neglected to use the correct Content-Type header (text/html), instead the
Content-Type header is usually missing.

Pine sees this as plain text (as it should) and displays the entire
message including all the HTML tags. I realize this is the correct
approach, but it isn't really the friendly approach.

I'm wondering if there's an option or configuration flag I can set to get
pine to try a little harder to interpret HTML content that isn't marked as
such?

Or, maybe there's a command I'm missing, similar to the "h" (view headers)
toggle. That would force the page to be viewed as HTML even if the
Content-Type is missing or not "text/html"?

--
---------------------------------------------------------------
Dan Peterson ([email protected]) - AOL, Dulles, VA 703-265-0226
---------------------------------------------------------------

--
-----------------------------------------------------------------
For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see:
http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/
-----------------------------------------------------------------

From [email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Tue, 17 Oct 2000 11:57:53 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.1])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id LAA22378;
Tue, 17 Oct 2000 11:57:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from list1.u.washington.edu ([email protected] [140.142.8.99])
by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id LAA08201;
Tue, 17 Oct 2000 11:57:50 -0700
Received: from host ([email protected] [140.142.56.13])
by list1.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id LAA24566;
Tue, 17 Oct 2000 11:56:26 -0700
Received: from mxu3.u.washington.edu (mxu3.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.7])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id LAA99460
for <[email protected]>; Tue, 17 Oct 2000 11:53:34 -0700
Received: from vger.timpanogas.org ([email protected] [207.109.151.240])
by mxu3.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id LAA23359
for <[email protected]>; Tue, 17 Oct 2000 11:53:33 -0700
Received: from asdf.capslock.lan (ppp5086.on.bellglobal.com [206.172.218.224])
by vger.timpanogas.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA03591;
Tue, 17 Oct 2000 12:49:41 -0600
Received: from localhost (mharris@localhost)
by asdf.capslock.lan (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA01453;
Tue, 17 Oct 2000 14:52:13 -0400
Message-Id: <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2000 14:52:12 -0400 (EDT)
Sender: [email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
From: "Mike A. Harris" <[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: HTML mode
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-To: Dan Peterson <[email protected]>
X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
X-Authentication-Warning: asdf.capslock.lan: mharris owned process doing -bs
X-Sender: [email protected]
X-Unexpected-Header: The Spanish Inquisition
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN

On Tue, 17 Oct 2000, Dan Peterson wrote:

>Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2000 10:59:10 -0400 (Eastern Daylight Time)
>From: Dan Peterson <[email protected]>
>To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
>Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
>Subject: HTML mode
>
>I frequently receive email that's in HTML format, but the email client
>neglected to use the correct Content-Type header (text/html), instead the
>Content-Type header is usually missing.
>
>Pine sees this as plain text (as it should) and displays the entire
>message including all the HTML tags. I realize this is the correct
>approach, but it isn't really the friendly approach.
>
>I'm wondering if there's an option or configuration flag I can set to get
>pine to try a little harder to interpret HTML content that isn't marked as
>such?
>
>Or, maybe there's a command I'm missing, similar to the "h" (view headers)
>toggle. That would force the page to be viewed as HTML even if the
>Content-Type is missing or not "text/html"?

You could use "procmail" to preprocess messages. You'd need a
procmail recipe that detects an all-HTML message body with no
content header, it then would add the header for you.

I have no idea an exact procmail recipe to do this, but some
piping through the unix "file" command might determine if it is
HTML or not, for messages lacking a content type header.

This would be a better question on the procmail mailing
list. Someone would probably write it for you too.

Good luck,
TTYL

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Mike A. Harris - Linux advocate - Open source advocate
Computer Consultant - Capslock Consulting
Copyright 2000 all rights reserved
----------------------------------------------------------------------

[Quote: Linus Torvalds - Aug 27, 2000 - linux-kernel mailing list]
"And I'm right. I'm always right, but in this case I'm just a bit more
right than I usually am." -- Linus Torvalds

From [email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Tue, 17 Oct 2000 12:17:48 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.1])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id MAA13512;
Tue, 17 Oct 2000 12:17:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from list3.u.washington.edu ([email protected] [140.142.8.100])
by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id MAA08828;
Tue, 17 Oct 2000 12:17:46 -0700
Received: from host ([email protected] [140.142.56.13])
by list3.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id MAA13914;
Tue, 17 Oct 2000 12:16:08 -0700
Received: from mxu3.u.washington.edu (mxu3.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.7])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id MAA163426
for <[email protected]>; Tue, 17 Oct 2000 12:14:55 -0700
Received: from euler.math.washington.edu (euler.math.washington.edu [128.95.224.1])
by mxu3.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id MAA27973
for <[email protected]>; Tue, 17 Oct 2000 12:14:55 -0700
Received: from goedel3.math.washington.edu (goedel3.math.washington.edu [128.95.224.12])
by euler.math.washington.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA420921;
Tue, 17 Oct 2000 12:14:53 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <Pine.OSF.4.29.9999.0010171200490.192694-100000@goedel3.math.washington.edu>
Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2000 12:14:52 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: [email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
From: Eduardo Chappa <[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: HTML mode
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-To: Dan Peterson <[email protected]>
X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN

*** Dan Peterson ([email protected]) wrote today:

:) I frequently receive email that's in HTML format, but the email client
:) neglected to use the correct Content-Type header (text/html), instead the
:) Content-Type header is usually missing.
:)
:) I'm wondering if there's an option or configuration flag I can set to get
:) pine to try a little harder to interpret HTML content that isn't marked as
:) such?

Hello Dan,

Something you can try to see how it works for you is to use
"display-filters". You can make some educated guesses like "if the first
string of a line is <HTML>, then the message is a message in text/html
format". Of course the guess can be incorrect, but it works most of the
times. All you would need to do is add the following text to your
sending-filters configuration option:

_BEGINNING(<HTML>)_ /usr/local/bin/lynx -force_html _TMPFILE_

and after that

_BEGINNING(<html>)_ /usr/local/bin/lynx -force_html _TMPFILE_

That will take care of most of the messages.

Now, about the disadvantages of this method.

- The filter will be activated when you intend to reply the message, that
is to say, you'll run lynx when you want to reply to the message.

- If a message is not in text/html format it will still be processed by
lynx if the filter is activated and the output may look ugly.

In any case above, after quitting lynx you'll see the unprocessed
message, so you won't lose anything and may have gained something.

--
Eduardo
http://www.math.washington.edu/~chappa/pine/

From [email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Wed, 18 Oct 2000 09:17:17 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id JAA14757;
Wed, 18 Oct 2000 09:17:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from list3.u.washington.edu ([email protected] [140.142.8.100])
by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id JAA20982;
Wed, 18 Oct 2000 09:17:13 -0700
Received: from host ([email protected] [140.142.56.13])
by list3.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id JAA13350;
Wed, 18 Oct 2000 09:16:21 -0700
Received: from mxu4.u.washington.edu (mxu4.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.8])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id JAA79008
for <[email protected]>; Wed, 18 Oct 2000 09:14:05 -0700
Received: from niwot.scd.ucar.edu (niwot.scd.ucar.edu [128.117.8.223])
by mxu4.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id JAA02138
for <[email protected]>; Wed, 18 Oct 2000 09:14:05 -0700
Received: from sedona.scd.ucar.edu (sedona.scd.ucar.edu [128.117.8.183])
by niwot.scd.ucar.edu (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id KAA15978;
Wed, 18 Oct 2000 10:14:01 -0600 (MDT)
Received: from localhost (era@localhost)
by sedona.scd.ucar.edu (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id KAA08066;
Wed, 18 Oct 2000 10:14:00 -0600 (MDT)
Message-Id: <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2000 10:14:00 -0600 (MDT)
Reply-To: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
From: Ed Arnold <[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: HTML mode
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-To: Dan Peterson <[email protected]>
X-Cc: [email protected]
X-Authentication-Warning: sedona.scd.ucar.edu: era owned process doing -bs
X-Sender: [email protected]
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN

On Tue, 17 Oct 2000, Dan Peterson wrote:

> I frequently receive email that's in HTML format, but the email client
> neglected to use the correct Content-Type header (text/html), instead the
> Content-Type header is usually missing.
>
> Pine sees this as plain text (as it should) and displays the entire
> message including all the HTML tags. I realize this is the correct
> approach, but it isn't really the friendly approach.
>
> I'm wondering if there's an option or configuration flag I can set to get
> pine to try a little harder to interpret HTML content that isn't marked as
> such?

I have an associated question about this I've asked before but not gotten
an answer to, thought I'd try again in case someone has an answer.

Even when there is a correct "Content-Type: text/html", I find that
netscape (specifically netscape-4.6) refuses to display an HTML
attachment because the temp file which pine saves does not have a
suffix of ".html". When pine sees the following .mailcap entry (this
on unix):

text/html; netscape %s; description="HTML"

.. it saves the text/html attachment as a pseudo-random filename
(in /var/tmp, as I recall) which does not have ".html" on the end,
then hands that off to netscape. Consequently netscape can't determine
that the file is HTML.

Anyone know a way around this?

From [email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Wed, 18 Oct 2000 13:46:41 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.1])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id NAA10309;
Wed, 18 Oct 2000 13:46:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from list3.u.washington.edu ([email protected] [140.142.8.100])
by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id NAA15893;
Wed, 18 Oct 2000 13:46:39 -0700
Received: from host ([email protected] [140.142.56.13])
by list3.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id NAA34694;
Wed, 18 Oct 2000 13:45:33 -0700
Received: from mxu1.u.washington.edu (mxu1.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.8])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id NAA111858
for <[email protected]>; Wed, 18 Oct 2000 13:43:14 -0700
Received: from kilo.clearoption.com (kilo.clearoption.com [205.200.121.30])
by mxu1.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id NAA13517
for <[email protected]>; Wed, 18 Oct 2000 13:43:13 -0700
Received: from ctech404 (link.clearoption.com [205.200.121.51])
by kilo.clearoption.com (Postfix) with SMTP
id 0B45110681; Wed, 18 Oct 2000 15:43:12 -0500 (CDT)
Message-Id: <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2000 15:41:53 -0500
Sender: [email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
From: "John Lange" <[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
Subject: RE: PINE format string vulnerabilities
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-To: "Mike A. Harris" <[email protected]>,
"Pine Discussion Forum" <[email protected]>
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN

I have no idea what the offical response is and postings to this list on
this topic are pretty much ignored. It seems like there isn't a pine
development team anymore or if there is, they don't read this list.

Furthermore, their web site has not been updated recently. So I'm wondering
if anyone is maintaining Pine anymore?

John Lange

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]]On Behalf Of Mike A. Harris
Sent: Friday, October 13, 2000 5:23 PM
To: Pine Discussion Forum
Subject: PINE format string vulnerabilities

Recently on BUGTRAQ someone posted a security audit on PINE
showing that it had over 4000 format string vulnerabilities.
Being an avid PINE user, I was shocked. I do not know the
legitimacy of this claim yet, however I wanted to ask here to get
the official response.

It was suggested on BUGTRAQ that it would be worthless to try and
fix PINE with that many bugs. I disagree completely however as
grep/sed/perl are our friends, and this is open source.

Therefore, has the PINE team an official position on PINE format
string vulnerabilities? Is anyone correcting any such
bugs? Does the PINE team need help doing so? I would be
interested in trying to help correct format string bugs if the
effort wouldn't be duplicated, and I could be assigned certain
portions of code to audit.

Thanks in advance.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Mike A. Harris - Linux advocate - Open source advocate
Computer Consultant - Capslock Consulting
Copyright 2000 all rights reserved
----------------------------------------------------------------------

"A Firewall is really much like a sophisticated traffic cop; it detects and
stops unauthorized or suspicious movement in or out of the network. But
security is more than a Firewall; it's a process. You can't just put in a
Firewall and think you're secure."

--
-----------------------------------------------------------------
For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see:
http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/
-----------------------------------------------------------------

From [email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Wed, 18 Oct 2000 13:47:39 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.1])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id NAA11058;
Wed, 18 Oct 2000 13:47:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from list3.u.washington.edu ([email protected] [140.142.8.100])
by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id NAA15933;
Wed, 18 Oct 2000 13:47:37 -0700
Received: from host ([email protected] [140.142.56.13])
by list3.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id NAA15140;
Wed, 18 Oct 2000 13:46:48 -0700
Received: from mxu3.u.washington.edu (mxu3.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.7])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id NAA55038
for <[email protected]>; Wed, 18 Oct 2000 13:44:22 -0700
Received: from kilo.clearoption.com (kilo.clearoption.com [205.200.121.30])
by mxu3.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id NAA28262
for <[email protected]>; Wed, 18 Oct 2000 13:44:21 -0700
Received: from ctech404 (link.clearoption.com [205.200.121.51])
by kilo.clearoption.com (Postfix) with SMTP
id 98BF510681; Wed, 18 Oct 2000 15:44:20 -0500 (CDT)
Message-Id: <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2000 15:43:01 -0500
Sender: [email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
From: "John Lange" <[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
Subject: RE: pine4.21, ssl connection to imap server
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-To: "Banananose Maldonado" <[email protected]>,
"Pine Discussion Forum" <[email protected]>
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN

I can't help you with pine and SSL, but I can give you a work around. The
most recent version of fetchmail will work perfectly with SSL. So you can
pull your mail in local and then read it with Pine.

John Lange

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]]On Behalf Of Banananose
Maldonado
Sent: Monday, October 16, 2000 2:27 AM
To: Pine Discussion Forum
Subject: pine4.21, ssl connection to imap server

Hi all-

I have a server running imaps with Openssl 0.9.6 on
port 993, which is serving its Netscape clients
properly. It has a self-signed certificate.

To set up Pine on my local host (Solaris 7) to run a
secure connection to this server, I have a line like
this in my .pinerc:

inbox-path={wuf.whatever.com/ssl}INBOX

This doesn't work... I just get "opening inbox" and
a spinning bar forever. Pine was compiled with the
ssl
patch.

The last few lines of my .pine-debug after running
"pine -d9" are:

21:39:24.347168
About to open folder "INBOX" inbox: "INBOX"

21:39:24.347883
busy_alarm(1, Opening "INBOX", 0, 1)

21:39:24.348688
q_status_message(Opening "INBOX" )

21:39:24.349268
output_message(Opening "INBOX" )

21:39:24.351257
STATUS cmd:120, max:1, min0

21:39:24.363004
IMAP 21:39:24 10/15 mm_log babble: Trying IP address
[10.3.0.20]

21:39:25.350137
alarm_signal()
..

The alarm signal repeats over and over... what am I
missing? Do I something akin to a "novalidate-cert"
switch on the inbox-path line? If I try this line:

inbox-path={wuf.whatever.com/ssl/novalidate-cert}INBOX

I get the "Can't open inbox invalid remote
specification" message.

Any help will be greatly appreciated...

Thanks Mucho,
=Barry=

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Messenger - Talk while you surf! It's FREE.
http://im.yahoo.com/
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------
For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see:
http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/
-----------------------------------------------------------------

From [email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Wed, 18 Oct 2000 13:54:34 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.1])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id NAA19788;
Wed, 18 Oct 2000 13:54:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from list3.u.washington.edu ([email protected] [140.142.8.100])
by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id NAA16112;
Wed, 18 Oct 2000 13:54:30 -0700
Received: from host ([email protected] [140.142.56.13])
by list3.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id NAA44938;
Wed, 18 Oct 2000 13:53:47 -0700
Received: from mxu2.u.washington.edu (mxu2.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.9])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id NAA221494
for <[email protected]>; Wed, 18 Oct 2000 13:52:00 -0700
Received: from moose.uvm.edu (moose.uvm.edu [132.198.101.60])
by mxu2.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id NAA07922
for <[email protected]>; Wed, 18 Oct 2000 13:51:55 -0700
Received: from gnu.uvm.edu (gnu.uvm.edu [132.198.101.64])
by moose.uvm.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA93304
for <[email protected]>; Wed, 18 Oct 2000 16:51:53 -0400
Received: from localhost (ashawley@localhost)
by gnu.uvm.edu (AIX4.3/UCB 8.8.8/8.8.7) with ESMTP id QAA41736
for <[email protected]>; Wed, 18 Oct 2000 16:51:52 -0400
Message-Id: <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2000 16:51:52 -0400 (EDT)
Sender: [email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
From: "Aaron S. Hawley" <[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
Subject: RE: PINE format string vulnerabilities
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
X-Authentication-Warning: gnu.uvm.edu: ashawley owned process doing -bs
X-Sender: [email protected]
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN

On Wed, 18 Oct 2000, John Lange wrote:

> I have no idea what the offical response is and postings to this list
> on this topic are pretty much ignored. It seems like there isn't a
> pine development team anymore or if there is, they don't read this
> list.
>
> Furthermore, their web site has not been updated recently. So I'm wondering
> if anyone is maintaining Pine anymore?

from what i've observed, they try to spend their time developing rather
than discussion on lists, or updating the web pages, unless a new version
is released. they occasionally pop up in a newsgroup or in this list if
people make enough inflammatory comments about their "lil' pride and joy"

version 4.3x or something should be on the way. we might just have
offline use (w/out hacking a pine config file).

aaron

From [email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Wed, 18 Oct 2000 15:08:27 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id PAA09938;
Wed, 18 Oct 2000 15:08:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from list3.u.washington.edu ([email protected] [140.142.8.100])
by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id PAA00443;
Wed, 18 Oct 2000 15:08:25 -0700
Received: from host ([email protected] [140.142.56.13])
by list3.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id PAA38470;
Wed, 18 Oct 2000 15:07:36 -0700
Received: from bp15.u.washington.edu ([email protected] [140.142.15.205])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id OAA131496
for <[email protected]>; Wed, 18 Oct 2000 14:52:03 -0700
Received: from localhost (leibrand@localhost)
by bp15.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id OAA170026;
Wed, 18 Oct 2000 14:51:59 -0700
Message-Id: <Pine.A41.4.29.9999.0010181445480.78676-100000@bp15.u.washington.edu>
Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2000 14:51:58 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: [email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
From: Scott Leibrand <[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
Subject: Disconnected support (was: RE: PINE format string vulnerabilities)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-To: "Aaron S. Hawley" <[email protected]>
X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
X-Sender: <[email protected]>
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN

On Wed, 18 Oct 2000, Aaron S. Hawley wrote:

> version 4.3x or something should be on the way. we might just have
> offline use (w/out hacking a pine config file).

No disconnected support this time around. They say the next release with
new features should have it. Here's a pared-down excerpt of the release
notes for pre-release 4, with my comments in parentheses:

Major new additions include:

* Configuration flexibility
+ pine configurations can now be stored remotely on an imap server
for access from different locations without the need to configure
for each location.
+ configuration may be split into two parts: generic configuration
and exceptional, per-platform configuration.
+ signatures can now be stored remotely or as part of the pinerc
file
+ for configuration options which are lists, inheritance is
supported
* New security features (SSL support, etc.)
* Minor rule enhancements
* Enhanced MAPI support for PC-Pine
* Various other new features and configuration options
* New command line options (for remote IMAP config file support)

Someone please yell at me if I'm not supposed to be telling people all
this. :)

--
Scott Leibrand
[email protected] (Yes, that is a valid address.)
http://students.washington.edu/leibrand
* RCW 19.190 notice: This email address is located in Washington State. *
* Unsolicited commercial email may be billed $500 per message. *

From [email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Wed, 18 Oct 2000 16:16:57 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.1])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id QAA01396;
Wed, 18 Oct 2000 16:16:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from list4.u.washington.edu ([email protected] [140.142.14.167])
by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id QAA20943;
Wed, 18 Oct 2000 16:16:55 -0700
Received: from host ([email protected] [140.142.56.13])
by list4.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id QAA32716;
Wed, 18 Oct 2000 16:15:21 -0700
Received: from mxu2.u.washington.edu (mxu2.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.9])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id QAA190402
for <[email protected]>; Wed, 18 Oct 2000 16:03:23 -0700
Received: from mxout1.cac.washington.edu (mxout1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.5])
by mxu2.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id QAA04618
for <[email protected]>; Wed, 18 Oct 2000 16:03:22 -0700
Received: from shiva1.cac.washington.edu (shiva1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.100.201])
by mxout1.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id QAA01613
for <[email protected]>; Wed, 18 Oct 2000 16:03:22 -0700
Received: from localhost (postmast@localhost)
by shiva1.cac.washington.edu (8.10.1+UW00.04/8.10.1+UW00.04) with ESMTP id e9IN3Ke20214
for <pine-info@u>; Wed, 18 Oct 2000 16:03:21 -0700
Message-Id: <Pine.GUL.4.30.0010181600310.12133-100000@shiva1.cac.washington.edu>
Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2000 16:03:19 -0700 (PDT)
Reply-To: <[email protected]>
Sender: [email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
From: <[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
Subject: disable LDAP record view?
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-To: <[email protected]>
X-Sender: <[email protected]>
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN

Hey all --

Due to a complaint brought up by a student, we are trying to find a way to
disable the full LDAP directory view in Pine and PC-Pine.

The reason being is that our Dean of Student's is interperting FERPA to
mean that we can not have the Student's ID number displayed anywere -- even
if it is not convertable to a ID number usable anywhere else.. (it's not a
disguised SSN).

Before we get the lawywers involved to discussed the finer points of
FERPA, is there anyway we disable this display? (Out of sight, out of
mind.)

Thanks,
Steve.

--
Steven Premeau, Network Manager [email protected] (414) 595-2005
Networking and Microcomputing Services University of Wisconsin - Parkside
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
"A car is more costly, complex, and dangerous than any word processor. Yet
you don't find a thousand page operating manual, nor must you check with a
friend to learn how to close the window ..."
- Cliff Stoll in "Silicon Snake Oil"

--
-----------------------------------------------------------------
For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see:
http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/
-----------------------------------------------------------------

From [email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Wed, 18 Oct 2000 16:20:10 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.1])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id QAA02264;
Wed, 18 Oct 2000 16:20:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from list3.u.washington.edu ([email protected] [140.142.8.100])
by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id QAA21066;
Wed, 18 Oct 2000 16:20:08 -0700
Received: from host ([email protected] [140.142.56.13])
by list3.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id QAA44940;
Wed, 18 Oct 2000 16:19:27 -0700
Received: from mxu3.u.washington.edu (mxu3.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.7])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id QAA106270
for <[email protected]>; Wed, 18 Oct 2000 16:18:01 -0700
Received: from mxout2.cac.washington.edu (mxout2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.4])
by mxu3.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id QAA29843
for <[email protected]>; Wed, 18 Oct 2000 16:18:00 -0700
Received: from shiva1.cac.washington.edu (shiva1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.100.201])
by mxout2.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id QAA15644
for <[email protected]>; Wed, 18 Oct 2000 16:18:00 -0700
Received: from localhost (postmast@localhost)
by shiva1.cac.washington.edu (8.10.1+UW00.04/8.10.1+UW00.04) with ESMTP id e9INHxV21186
for <pine-info@u>; Wed, 18 Oct 2000 16:17:59 -0700
Message-Id: <Pine.GUL.4.30.0010181616340.12133-100000@shiva1.cac.washington.edu>
Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2000 16:17:58 -0700 (PDT)
Reply-To: Atle Weibell <[email protected]>
Sender: [email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
From: Atle Weibell <[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
Subject: new error message ("mail not sent")
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-To: <[email protected]>
X-Sender: <[email protected]>
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN

Hello,

I've got a new error message:

[Mail not sent. Sending error: 501 bogus mail from]

This happened on a mail that was forwarded to my usual account from
another account, and when I replied, my other address came up in a From:
field in the top of the headers.

Any suggestions?

--
Atle Weibell | [email protected] | pr 51690007 | mo 41310057 | fx 51690431 |

--

--
-----------------------------------------------------------------
For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see:
http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/
-----------------------------------------------------------------

From [email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Wed, 18 Oct 2000 16:22:10 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id QAA08644;
Wed, 18 Oct 2000 16:22:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from list4.u.washington.edu ([email protected] [140.142.14.167])
by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id QAA03011;
Wed, 18 Oct 2000 16:22:08 -0700
Received: from host ([email protected] [140.142.56.13])
by list4.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id QAA26224;
Wed, 18 Oct 2000 16:21:24 -0700
Received: from bp15.u.washington.edu ([email protected] [140.142.15.205])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id QAA130422
for <[email protected]>; Wed, 18 Oct 2000 16:20:45 -0700
Received: from localhost (leibrand@localhost)
by bp15.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id QAA70144
for <[email protected]>; Wed, 18 Oct 2000 16:20:44 -0700
Message-Id: <Pine.A41.4.29.9999.0010181618390.142938-100000@bp15.u.washington.edu>
Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2000 16:20:43 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: [email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
From: Scott Leibrand <[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Disconnected support (was: RE: PINE format string vulnerabilities)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.A41.4.29.9999.0010181445480.78676-100000@bp15.u.washington.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
X-Sender: <[email protected]>
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN

On Wed, 18 Oct 2000, Scott Leibrand wrote:

> No disconnected support this time around. They say the next release with
> new features should have it.

Clarification: That's when we (Pine power users like myself) HOPE it will
be available. As usual, the Pine team (which doesn't include me) makes no
promises about when new features like this one (which IS on the
future-features list) might be added.

--
Scott Leibrand
[email protected] (Yes, that is a valid address.)
http://students.washington.edu/leibrand
* RCW 19.190 notice: This email address is located in Washington State. *
* Unsolicited commercial email may be billed $500 per message. *

From [email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Wed, 18 Oct 2000 16:30:07 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id QAA14315;
Wed, 18 Oct 2000 16:30:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from list2.u.washington.edu ([email protected] [140.142.14.165])
by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id QAA03290;
Wed, 18 Oct 2000 16:30:05 -0700
Received: from host ([email protected] [140.142.56.13])
by list2.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id QAA23686;
Wed, 18 Oct 2000 16:29:15 -0700
Received: from bp15.u.washington.edu ([email protected] [140.142.15.205])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id QAA151562
for <[email protected]>; Wed, 18 Oct 2000 16:23:04 -0700
Received: from localhost (leibrand@localhost)
by bp15.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id QAA162042;
Wed, 18 Oct 2000 16:23:01 -0700
Message-Id: <Pine.A41.4.29.9999.0010181621110.142938-100000@bp15.u.washington.edu>
Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2000 16:23:00 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: [email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
From: Scott Leibrand <[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: new error message ("mail not sent")
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GUL.4.30.0010181616340.12133-100000@shiva1.cac.washington.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-To: Atle Weibell <[email protected]>
X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
X-Sender: <[email protected]>
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN

On Wed, 18 Oct 2000, Atle Weibell wrote:

> I've got a new error message:
>
> [Mail not sent. Sending error: 501 bogus mail from]
>
> This happened on a mail that was forwarded to my usual account from
> another account, and when I replied, my other address came up in a From:
> field in the top of the headers.

Pine is passing on that message from your SMTP server or MTA. It sounds
like it won't tolerate you changing your From: header. (I presume you did
that on purpose...) Talk to your ISP to get the details and find out what
you're allowed to do.

--
Scott Leibrand
[email protected] (Yes, that is a valid address.)
http://students.washington.edu/leibrand
* RCW 19.190 notice: This email address is located in Washington State. *
* Unsolicited commercial email may be billed $500 per message. *

From [email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Wed, 18 Oct 2000 18:52:34 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.1])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id SAA12589;
Wed, 18 Oct 2000 18:52:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from list1.u.washington.edu ([email protected] [140.142.8.99])
by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id SAA24843;
Wed, 18 Oct 2000 18:52:28 -0700
Received: from host ([email protected] [140.142.56.13])
by list1.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id SAA42662;
Wed, 18 Oct 2000 18:51:42 -0700
Received: from mxu2.u.washington.edu (mxu2.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.9])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id SAA141942
for <[email protected]>; Wed, 18 Oct 2000 18:50:50 -0700
Received: from vger.timpanogas.org ([email protected] [207.109.151.240])
by mxu2.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id SAA32002
for <[email protected]>; Wed, 18 Oct 2000 18:50:44 -0700
Received: from asdf.capslock.lan (SSMarie-ppp111156.sympatico.ca [216.209.120.55])
by vger.timpanogas.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id TAA07521;
Wed, 18 Oct 2000 19:47:37 -0600
Received: from localhost (mharris@localhost)
by asdf.capslock.lan (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id UAA08174;
Wed, 18 Oct 2000 20:45:44 -0400
Message-Id: <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2000 20:45:44 -0400 (EDT)
Sender: [email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
From: "Mike A. Harris" <[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
Subject: RE: PINE format string vulnerabilities
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-To: "Aaron S. Hawley" <[email protected]>
X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
X-Authentication-Warning: asdf.capslock.lan: mharris owned process doing -bs
X-Sender: [email protected]
X-Unexpected-Header: The Spanish Inquisition
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN

On Wed, 18 Oct 2000, Aaron S. Hawley wrote:

>> I have no idea what the offical response is and postings to this list
>> on this topic are pretty much ignored. It seems like there isn't a
>> pine development team anymore or if there is, they don't read this
>> list.
>>
>> Furthermore, their web site has not been updated recently. So I'm wondering
>> if anyone is maintaining Pine anymore?
>
>from what i've observed, they try to spend their time developing rather
>than discussion on lists, or updating the web pages, unless a new version
>is released. they occasionally pop up in a newsgroup or in this list if
>people make enough inflammatory comments about their "lil' pride and joy"

Well, I am a complete total die hard PINE user, so.. ;o)
I've got my complaints too, but _NOTHING_ will stop me from using
PINE short of a bullet in the head.

>version 4.3x or something should be on the way. we might just have
>offline use (w/out hacking a pine config file).

Cool, so the number of format string bugs will be even higher
soon! I can't wait! ;o)

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Mike A. Harris - Linux advocate - Open source advocate
Computer Consultant - Capslock Consulting
Copyright 2000 all rights reserved
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Want to try a new high performance open source web server? Try Caudium!
http://caudium.org http://caudium.sourceforge.net

From [email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Wed, 18 Oct 2000 19:44:54 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id TAA04128;
Wed, 18 Oct 2000 19:44:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from list2.u.washington.edu ([email protected] [140.142.14.165])
by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id TAA07492;
Wed, 18 Oct 2000 19:44:52 -0700
Received: from host ([email protected] [140.142.56.13])
by list2.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id TAA36984;
Wed, 18 Oct 2000 19:44:01 -0700
Received: from mxu2.u.washington.edu (mxu2.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.9])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id TAA161032
for <[email protected]>; Wed, 18 Oct 2000 19:43:19 -0700
Received: from smtp.tznet.com (smtp.tznet.com [206.31.5.6])
by mxu2.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id TAA06352
for <[email protected]>; Wed, 18 Oct 2000 19:43:18 -0700
Received: from darkangel.gothic.com ([205.216.111.189]) by smtp.tznet.com
with ESMTP (IPAD 2.52/64) id 3462100; Wed, 18 Oct 2000 21:43:06 -0500
Received: by darkangel.gothic.com (Postfix, from userid 1001)
id 28764B1; Wed, 18 Oct 2000 21:50:30 -0500 (CDT)
Message-Id: <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2000 21:50:30 -0500
Sender: [email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
From: Michael Urban <[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
Subject: Fix for buffer overflows in From field?
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN

I'm sorry to ask a question that has most likely already been asked
before (although I could not find anything regarding this in either
the archives or on the pine website), but does anyone know if there
is a fix in the works for the buffer overflow vulnerability in the
>From field? I've always prefered using Pine, but I learned about this
security hole when trying to install tha latest Pine port on my
FreeBSD system and finding the port marked "FORBIDDEN". After this, I
read more about it on BUGTRAQ.

I guess I have two questions:

#1: Is there a fix?

#2: Is this problem serious enough to stop using Pine? Right now,
just to be safe, I am using Mutt, although I much prefer Pine.

Thanks for any info.
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------
For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see:
http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/
-----------------------------------------------------------------

From [email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Wed, 18 Oct 2000 20:23:31 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.1])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id UAA14013;
Wed, 18 Oct 2000 20:23:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from list2.u.washington.edu ([email protected] [140.142.14.165])
by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id UAA26575;
Wed, 18 Oct 2000 20:23:28 -0700
Received: from host ([email protected] [140.142.56.13])
by list2.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id UAA40732;
Wed, 18 Oct 2000 20:22:35 -0700
Received: from mxu2.u.washington.edu (mxu2.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.9])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id UAA161126
for <[email protected]>; Wed, 18 Oct 2000 20:22:00 -0700
Received: from smtp.tznet.com (smtp.tznet.com [206.31.5.6])
by mxu2.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id UAA11242
for <[email protected]>; Wed, 18 Oct 2000 20:22:00 -0700
Received: from darkangel.gothic.com ([205.216.111.189]) by smtp.tznet.com
with ESMTP (IPAD 2.52/64) id 3483300; Wed, 18 Oct 2000 22:21:57 -0500
Received: by darkangel.gothic.com (Postfix, from userid 1001)
id 2F089B1; Wed, 18 Oct 2000 22:29:12 -0500 (CDT)
Message-Id: <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2000 22:29:12 -0500
Sender: [email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
From: Michael Urban <[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
Subject: Oops.. Sorry..
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN

Oops. Sorry. I just was looking through the archives again and I did
find a thread on the From buffer overflow problem.
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------
For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see:
http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/
-----------------------------------------------------------------

From [email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 19 Oct 2000 09:33:35 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.1])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id JAA03975;
Thu, 19 Oct 2000 09:33:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from list3.u.washington.edu ([email protected] [140.142.8.100])
by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id JAA11540;
Thu, 19 Oct 2000 09:33:33 -0700
Received: from host ([email protected] [140.142.56.13])
by list3.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id JAA21398;
Thu, 19 Oct 2000 09:32:43 -0700
Received: from mxu2.u.washington.edu (mxu2.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.9])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id JAA124300
for <[email protected]>; Thu, 19 Oct 2000 09:30:38 -0700
Received: from usc.edu ([email protected] [128.125.253.136])
by mxu2.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id JAA25498
for <[email protected]>; Thu, 19 Oct 2000 09:30:37 -0700
Received: from skat.usc.edu ([email protected] [128.125.253.131])
by usc.edu (8.9.3.1/8.9.3/usc) with ESMTP
id JAA24730 for <[email protected]>; Thu, 19 Oct 2000 09:30:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cohiba (cohiba.usc.edu [128.125.10.160])
by skat.usc.edu (8.10.1/8.10.1/usc) with ESMTP
id e9JGUUX02630 for <[email protected]>; Thu, 19 Oct 2000 09:30:31 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <Pine.WNT.4.21.0010190929190.1380-100000@cohiba>
Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2000 09:30:25 -0700 (Pacific Daylight Time)
Sender: [email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
From: Mike Walker <[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
Subject: kerberos for PC-Pine
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
X-X-Sender: [email protected]
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN

Does PC Pine support Kerberos?

thanks,
Mike

--
-----------------------------------------------------------------
For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see:
http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/
-----------------------------------------------------------------

From [email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 19 Oct 2000 12:22:05 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.1])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id MAA00192;
Thu, 19 Oct 2000 12:22:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from list4.u.washington.edu ([email protected] [140.142.14.167])
by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id MAA17617;
Thu, 19 Oct 2000 12:22:04 -0700
Received: from host ([email protected] [140.142.56.13])
by list4.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id MAA22944;
Thu, 19 Oct 2000 12:21:18 -0700
Received: from mxu4.u.washington.edu (mxu4.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.8])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id MAA190310
for <[email protected]>; Thu, 19 Oct 2000 12:17:08 -0700
Received: from mxout1.cac.washington.edu (mxout1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.5])
by mxu4.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id MAA23963
for <[email protected]>; Thu, 19 Oct 2000 12:17:08 -0700
Received: from shiva2.cac.washington.edu (shiva2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.100.202])
by mxout1.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id MAA07442
for <[email protected]>; Thu, 19 Oct 2000 12:17:08 -0700
Received: from localhost (hubert@localhost)
by shiva2.cac.washington.edu (8.10.1+UW00.04/8.10.1+UW00.04) with ESMTP id e9JJH7w23073
for <[email protected]>; Thu, 19 Oct 2000 12:17:07 -0700
Message-Id: <Pine.GUL.4.30.0010191151430.19134-100000@shiva2.cac.washington.edu>
Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2000 12:17:05 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: [email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
From: Steve Hubert <[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
Subject: RE: PINE format string vulnerabilities
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN

We still exist and we read the list. We're not very good at coming up with
official responses. The newmail check buffer overflow bug will be fixed in
Pine 4.30. We are trying to get 4.30 out as soon as we can. We are almost
always overly optimistic when we predict release dates so we don't predict
release dates publicly anymore. But what the heck, probably next week.

There will still be 3 or 4000 possible format string vulnerabilities so we
would guess that we'll remain on the forbidden list. I suppose if we
changed calls like

strcpy(buf, "xyz") into
strncpy(buf, "xyz", buflen)

they would take us off the list. Maybe we'll do that some day.

--
Steve Hubert <[email protected]>
Networks and Distributed Computing, Univ. of Washington, Seattle

On Wed, 18 Oct 2000, John Lange wrote:

> I have no idea what the offical response is and postings to this list on
> this topic are pretty much ignored. It seems like there isn't a pine
> development team anymore or if there is, they don't read this list.
>
> Furthermore, their web site has not been updated recently. So I'm wondering
> if anyone is maintaining Pine anymore?
>
> John Lange

From [email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 19 Oct 2000 12:25:03 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.1])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id MAA01266;
Thu, 19 Oct 2000 12:25:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from list1.u.washington.edu ([email protected] [140.142.8.99])
by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id MAA17710;
Thu, 19 Oct 2000 12:25:02 -0700
Received: from host ([email protected] [140.142.56.13])
by list1.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id MAA53534;
Thu, 19 Oct 2000 12:23:34 -0700
Received: from mxu1.u.washington.edu (mxu1.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.8])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id MAA193624
for <[email protected]>; Thu, 19 Oct 2000 12:19:35 -0700
Received: from mxout2.cac.washington.edu (mxout2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.4])
by mxu1.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id MAA12902
for <[email protected]>; Thu, 19 Oct 2000 12:19:34 -0700
Received: from shiva2.cac.washington.edu (shiva2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.100.202])
by mxout2.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id MAA19106;
Thu, 19 Oct 2000 12:19:33 -0700
Received: from localhost (hubert@localhost)
by shiva2.cac.washington.edu (8.10.1+UW00.04/8.10.1+UW00.04) with ESMTP id e9JJJWL23257;
Thu, 19 Oct 2000 12:19:33 -0700
Message-Id: <Pine.GUL.4.30.0010191218130.19134-100000@shiva2.cac.washington.edu>
Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2000 12:19:31 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: [email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
From: Steve Hubert <[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: disable LDAP record view?
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GUL.4.30.0010181600310.12133-100000@shiva1.cac.washington.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-To: <[email protected]>
X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN

No way to disable it in pine without source code mods. It seems kind of
silly to disable it, though. It is still available over the net and will
be viewable in other applications. Seems like you need to disable it at
the ldap server.

--
Steve Hubert <[email protected]>
Networks and Distributed Computing, Univ. of Washington, Seattle

On Wed, 18 Oct 2000 [email protected] wrote:

> Hey all --
>
> Due to a complaint brought up by a student, we are trying to find a way to
> disable the full LDAP directory view in Pine and PC-Pine.
>
> The reason being is that our Dean of Student's is interperting FERPA to
> mean that we can not have the Student's ID number displayed anywere -- even
> if it is not convertable to a ID number usable anywhere else.. (it's not a
> disguised SSN).
>
> Before we get the lawywers involved to discussed the finer points of
> FERPA, is there anyway we disable this display? (Out of sight, out of
> mind.)
>
> Thanks,
> Steve.
>
>

From [email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 19 Oct 2000 13:31:04 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.1])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id NAA27436;
Thu, 19 Oct 2000 13:31:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from list4.u.washington.edu ([email protected] [140.142.14.167])
by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id NAA19962;
Thu, 19 Oct 2000 13:31:03 -0700
Received: from host ([email protected] [140.142.56.13])
by list4.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id NAA32686;
Thu, 19 Oct 2000 13:30:02 -0700
Received: from mxu4.u.washington.edu (mxu4.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.8])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id NAA38416
for <[email protected]>; Thu, 19 Oct 2000 13:28:36 -0700
Received: from isr5981.urh.uiuc.edu ([email protected] [130.126.211.213])
by mxu4.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id NAA07248
for <[email protected]>; Thu, 19 Oct 2000 13:28:36 -0700
Received: (qmail 58839 invoked by uid 1000); 19 Oct 2000 20:28:35 -0000
Received: from localhost ([email protected])
by localhost with SMTP; 19 Oct 2000 20:28:35 -0000
Message-Id: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0010191520330.58785-100000@palanthas.neverending.org>
Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2000 15:28:35 -0500 (CDT)
Sender: [email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
From: Frank Tobin <[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
Subject: RE: PINE format string vulnerabilities
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GUL.4.30.0010191151430.19134-100000@shiva2.cac.washington.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
X-Sender: [email protected]
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN

Steve Hubert, at 12:17 -0700 on Thu, 19 Oct 2000, wrote:

> I suppose if we changed calls like
>
> strcpy(buf, "xyz") into
> strncpy(buf, "xyz", buflen)
>
> they would take us off the list. Maybe we'll do that some day.

They would likely take you off the list if you did. The multitude of
these un-n'd str* calls appears to be the overriding, but not only, factor
in the decision.

Ran: Isn't C just awful with strings? :)

--
Frank Tobin http://www.uiuc.edu/~ftobin/

From [email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 19 Oct 2000 13:38:32 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.1])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id NAA32461;
Thu, 19 Oct 2000 13:38:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from list3.u.washington.edu ([email protected] [140.142.8.100])
by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id NAA20221;
Thu, 19 Oct 2000 13:38:30 -0700
Received: from host ([email protected] [140.142.56.13])
by list3.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id NAA42164;
Thu, 19 Oct 2000 13:37:35 -0700
Received: from mxu4.u.washington.edu (mxu4.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.8])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id NAA109690
for <[email protected]>; Thu, 19 Oct 2000 13:36:37 -0700
Received: from gort.office.aol.com (pix-fw.wan.aol.com [152.163.190.1])
by mxu4.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id NAA09255
for <[email protected]>; Thu, 19 Oct 2000 13:36:36 -0700
Received: from DBPETE (nikto [10.2.107.233]) by gort.office.aol.com with ESMTP (8.7.1/8.7.1) id QAA01396; Thu, 19 Oct 2000 16:36:01 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2000 16:35:56 -0400 (Eastern Daylight Time)
Sender: [email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
From: Dan Peterson <[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: HTML mode
In-Reply-To: <Pine.OSF.4.29.9999.0010171200490.192694-100000@goedel3.math.washington.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-To: Eduardo Chappa <[email protected]>
X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
X-X-Sender: [email protected]
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN

On Tue, 17 Oct 2000, Eduardo Chappa wrote:

> *** Dan Peterson ([email protected]) wrote today:
>
> :) I frequently receive email that's in HTML format, but the email client
> :) neglected to use the correct Content-Type header (text/html), instead the
> :) Content-Type header is usually missing.
> :)
> :) I'm wondering if there's an option or configuration flag I can set to get
> :) pine to try a little harder to interpret HTML content that isn't marked as
> :) such?
>
> Hello Dan,
>
> Something you can try to see how it works for you is to use
> "display-filters". You can make some educated guesses like "if the
> first string of a line is <HTML>, then the message is a message in
> text/html format". Of course the guess can be incorrect, but it works
> most of the times. All you would need to do is add the following text
> to your sending-filters configuration option:
>
> _BEGINNING(<HTML>)_ /usr/local/bin/lynx -force_html _TMPFILE_
>
> and after that
>
> _BEGINNING(<html>)_ /usr/local/bin/lynx -force_html _TMPFILE_
>
> That will take care of most of the messages.
>
> Now, about the disadvantages of this method.
>
> - The filter will be activated when you intend to reply the message, that
> is to say, you'll run lynx when you want to reply to the message.
>
> - If a message is not in text/html format it will still be processed by
> lynx if the filter is activated and the output may look ugly.
>
> In any case above, after quitting lynx you'll see the unprocessed
> message, so you won't lose anything and may have gained something.

Hmmm, I'm a bit confused, you mention display-filters at first, then
switch to sending-filters. Was that just a typo?

I'm using PC-PINE, so I'd need to do make the display-filter command do
something different, since I don't have lynx. Perhaps a perl script that
just looked at the message and added the correct Content-Type header? Or
does the display-filter even get the headers?

As for sending-filter, I'm really not interested in changing the text when
I send it... at least that wasn't my original question. All I want to be
able to do is VIEW an email that contains HTML, but does NOT use a
Content-Type of "text/html" (perhaps no Content-Type at all).

Since Pine is already capable of displaying the HTML, it would sure be
nice if there was some toggle (like the show headers toggle), that said
"View this message as if it's HTML... regardless of the Content-Type"...
maybe like "^H".

I wonder if there's any possibility something like that could be included
in the imminent 4.3x release. :-)

From [email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 19 Oct 2000 13:44:02 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id NAA14054;
Thu, 19 Oct 2000 13:44:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from list1.u.washington.edu ([email protected] [140.142.8.99])
by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id NAA01827;
Thu, 19 Oct 2000 13:44:01 -0700
Received: from host ([email protected] [140.142.56.13])
by list1.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id NAA34954;
Thu, 19 Oct 2000 13:42:46 -0700
Received: from mxu4.u.washington.edu (mxu4.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.8])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id NAA202878
for <[email protected]>; Thu, 19 Oct 2000 13:42:05 -0700
Received: from gort.office.aol.com (pix-fw.wan.aol.com [152.163.190.1])
by mxu4.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id NAA10470
for <[email protected]>; Thu, 19 Oct 2000 13:42:05 -0700
Received: from DBPETE (nikto [10.2.107.233]) by gort.office.aol.com with ESMTP (8.7.1/8.7.1) id QAA01440 for <[email protected]>; Thu, 19 Oct 2000 16:42:01 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2000 16:41:56 -0400 (Eastern Daylight Time)
Sender: [email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
From: Dan Peterson <[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
Subject: Replying to html mail
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-X-Sender: [email protected]
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN

I sent the message over a year ago... seems like about the time 4.20 or
4.21 came out.

I've noticed something else about this... when I originally reply to the
email, it looks fine. But if I "^O" to postpone it, then continue it
later, that's when it gets screwed up.

I'm wondering if there are any patches for this, or if perhaps it will be
fixed in 4.3x?

------------------------------------------------------------------------

---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Fri, 3 Sep 1999 20:51:03 +0100 (BST)
From: Alan Thew <[email protected]>
To: Dan Peterson <[email protected]>
Cc: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Replying to html mail

we've seen this before. It's a bug IMO.

--
Alan Thew [email protected]
Computing Services,University of Liverpool Fax: +44 151 794-4442

On Thu, 2 Sep 1999 18:12 , Dan Peterson <[email protected]> said:

> I've noticed that sometimes Pine seems to use the "Content-type:"
> header of the original mail message when replying. Is this the way it
> should be?
>
> The problem is, the "Content-type" is "text/html", but the actual
> content is really "text/plain". So when the message is viewed, all
> the text is wrapped together.

From [email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 19 Oct 2000 13:47:44 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id NAA06659;
Thu, 19 Oct 2000 13:47:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from list1.u.washington.edu ([email protected] [140.142.8.99])
by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id NAA01991;
Thu, 19 Oct 2000 13:47:42 -0700
Received: from host ([email protected] [140.142.56.13])
by list1.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id NAA37962;
Thu, 19 Oct 2000 13:47:08 -0700
Received: from mxu2.u.washington.edu (mxu2.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.9])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id NAA202976
for <[email protected]>; Thu, 19 Oct 2000 13:45:50 -0700
Received: from gort.office.aol.com (pix-fw.wan.aol.com [152.163.190.1])
by mxu2.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id NAA17374;
Thu, 19 Oct 2000 13:45:49 -0700
Received: from DBPETE (nikto [10.2.107.233]) by gort.office.aol.com with ESMTP (8.7.1/8.7.1) id QAA01474; Thu, 19 Oct 2000 16:45:46 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2000 16:45:41 -0400 (Eastern Daylight Time)
Sender: [email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
From: Dan Peterson <[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Disconnected support (was: RE: PINE format string vulnerabilities)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.A41.4.29.9999.0010181445480.78676-100000@bp15.u.washington.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-To: Scott Leibrand <[email protected]>
X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
X-X-Sender: [email protected]
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN

On Wed, 18 Oct 2000, Scott Leibrand wrote:

> Major new additions include:
>
> * Configuration flexibility
> + pine configurations can now be stored remotely on an imap server
> for access from different locations without the need to configure
> for each location.
> + configuration may be split into two parts: generic configuration
> and exceptional, per-platform configuration.
> + signatures can now be stored remotely or as part of the pinerc
> file
> + for configuration options which are lists, inheritance is
> supported
> * New security features (SSL support, etc.)
> * Minor rule enhancements

Any chance these "Minor rule enhancements" would include some Role
handling... specifically, supporting ^P and ^N to select a Role?

I believe I wasn't the only one that wanted that particular feature added
back in. ;-)

On Mon, 18 Oct 1999, Scott Leibrand wrote:

> [...]
>
> - What happened to ^P and ^N in the Roles Selection screen? Now it's
> a two-step process to choose an alternate role, where before it was
> only one.

From [email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 19 Oct 2000 14:04:14 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.1])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id OAA12981;
Thu, 19 Oct 2000 14:04:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from list4.u.washington.edu ([email protected] [140.142.14.167])
by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id OAA21080;
Thu, 19 Oct 2000 14:04:08 -0700
Received: from host ([email protected] [140.142.56.13])
by list4.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id OAA16134;
Thu, 19 Oct 2000 14:03:17 -0700
Received: from mxu3.u.washington.edu (mxu3.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.7])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id OAA38412
for <[email protected]>; Thu, 19 Oct 2000 14:02:16 -0700
Received: from usceast.cs.sc.edu (usceast.cs.sc.edu [129.252.11.9])
by mxu3.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id OAA11629
for <[email protected]>; Thu, 19 Oct 2000 14:02:14 -0700
Received: from pearl.cs.sc.edu (pearl.cs.sc.edu [129.252.130.40])
by usceast.cs.sc.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA41744
for <[email protected]>; Thu, 19 Oct 2000 17:02:09 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2000 17:02:08 -0400 (EDT)
Sender: [email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
From: Gopi Sundaram <[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: kerberos for PC-Pine
In-Reply-To: <Pine.WNT.4.21.0010190929190.1380-100000@cohiba>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN

On Thu, 19 Oct 2000, Mike Walker wrote:

> Does PC Pine support Kerberos?

http://www.washington.edu/pine/faq/sysadmins.html#10.3

--
Gopi Sundaram
[email protected]
http://www.cse.sc.edu/~gopalan/Pine/

From [email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 19 Oct 2000 14:07:06 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.1])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id OAA19344;
Thu, 19 Oct 2000 14:07:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from list1.u.washington.edu ([email protected] [140.142.8.99])
by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id OAA21176;
Thu, 19 Oct 2000 14:07:04 -0700
Received: from host ([email protected] [140.142.56.13])
by list1.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id OAA33890;
Thu, 19 Oct 2000 14:06:24 -0700
Received: from mxu3.u.washington.edu (mxu3.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.7])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id OAA38564
for <[email protected]>; Thu, 19 Oct 2000 14:05:23 -0700
Received: from usceast.cs.sc.edu (usceast.cs.sc.edu [129.252.11.9])
by mxu3.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id OAA12334
for <[email protected]>; Thu, 19 Oct 2000 14:05:22 -0700
Received: from pearl.cs.sc.edu (pearl.cs.sc.edu [129.252.130.40])
by usceast.cs.sc.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA41785
for <[email protected]>; Thu, 19 Oct 2000 17:05:15 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2000 17:05:15 -0400 (EDT)
Sender: [email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
From: Gopi Sundaram <[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: HTML mode
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN

On Thu, 19 Oct 2000, Dan Peterson wrote:

> Hmmm, I'm a bit confused, you mention display-filters at first, then
> switch to sending-filters. Was that just a typo?

Yes. It should be display filters all the way through.

> I'm using PC-PINE

You may not be able to use filters, because the Pipe command does not
work correctly on PC-Pine. I could be wrong on this point though.

Gopi.

--
Gopi Sundaram
[email protected]
http://www.cse.sc.edu/~gopalan/Pine/

From [email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 19 Oct 2000 16:44:36 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.1])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id QAA08557;
Thu, 19 Oct 2000 16:44:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from list3.u.washington.edu ([email protected] [140.142.8.100])
by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id QAA26217;
Thu, 19 Oct 2000 16:44:34 -0700
Received: from host ([email protected] [140.142.56.13])
by list3.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id QAA15438;
Thu, 19 Oct 2000 16:43:57 -0700
Received: from mxu3.u.washington.edu (mxu3.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.7])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id QAA76378
for <[email protected]>; Thu, 19 Oct 2000 16:43:07 -0700
Received: from euler.math.washington.edu (euler.math.washington.edu [128.95.224.1])
by mxu3.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id QAA15997
for <[email protected]>; Thu, 19 Oct 2000 16:43:07 -0700
Received: from goedel2.math.washington.edu (goedel2.math.washington.edu [128.95.224.11])
by euler.math.washington.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA143536;
Thu, 19 Oct 2000 16:43:05 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <Pine.OSF.4.29.99999.0010191639500.204535-100000@goedel2.math.washington.edu>
Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2000 16:43:04 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: [email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
From: Eduardo Chappa <[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Replying to html mail
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-To: Dan Peterson <[email protected]>
X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN

*** Dan Peterson ([email protected]) wrote today:

:) I sent the message over a year ago... seems like about the time 4.20 or
:) 4.21 came out.
:)
:) I've noticed something else about this... when I originally reply to the
:) email, it looks fine. But if I "^O" to postpone it, then continue it
:) later, that's when it gets screwed up.
:)
:) I'm wondering if there are any patches for this, or if perhaps it will be
:) fixed in 4.3x?

I do not see the bug you mention in the pre-release of pine4.30 which is
coming soon, so it must have been fixed.

--
Eduardo
http://www.math.washington.edu/~chappa/pine/

From [email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 19 Oct 2000 16:57:00 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.1])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id QAA20486;
Thu, 19 Oct 2000 16:56:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from list4.u.washington.edu ([email protected] [140.142.14.167])
by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id QAA26632;
Thu, 19 Oct 2000 16:56:58 -0700
Received: from host ([email protected] [140.142.56.13])
by list4.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id QAA25324;
Thu, 19 Oct 2000 16:56:30 -0700
Received: from mxu1.u.washington.edu (mxu1.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.8])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id QAA158906
for <[email protected]>; Thu, 19 Oct 2000 16:55:43 -0700
Received: from gort.office.aol.com (pix-fw.wan.aol.com [152.163.190.1])
by mxu1.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id QAA12944
for <[email protected]>; Thu, 19 Oct 2000 16:55:43 -0700
Received: from DBPETE (nikto [10.2.107.233]) by gort.office.aol.com with ESMTP (8.7.1/8.7.1) id TAA02814 for <[email protected]>; Thu, 19 Oct 2000 19:55:39 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2000 19:55:32 -0400 (Eastern Daylight Time)
Sender: [email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
From: Dan Peterson <[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
Subject: Sort order INBOX/folder
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-X-Sender: [email protected]
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN

Is there anyway to use a different sort order in my INBOX (or INBOX) and
folders?

I like to have my INBOX sorted by "arrival", so I can look at the bottom
to see what the latest mail is.

Often times I let email (that I'm supposed to do something with) sit in my
inbox for a while, before I save it to a folder. But when I go look in
the folder, it appears the "arrival" date is the date it was saved in the
folder, not the date it originally received in the INBOX.

So, I end up sorting a folder by Date every time I go into it.

It would be nice to have a default sort-order for folders (not including
INBOX) that was by "Date", instead of "Arrival".

Anyway to do that?

--
---------------------------------------------------------------
Dan Peterson ([email protected]) - AOL, Dulles, VA 703-265-0226
---------------------------------------------------------------

--
-----------------------------------------------------------------
For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see:
http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/
-----------------------------------------------------------------

From [email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 19 Oct 2000 17:31:29 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.1])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id RAA25870;
Thu, 19 Oct 2000 17:31:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from list3.u.washington.edu ([email protected] [140.142.8.100])
by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id RAA27434;
Thu, 19 Oct 2000 17:31:28 -0700
Received: from host ([email protected] [140.142.56.13])
by list3.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id RAA34796;
Thu, 19 Oct 2000 17:30:51 -0700
Received: from mxu3.u.washington.edu (mxu3.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.7])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id RAA116062
for <[email protected]>; Thu, 19 Oct 2000 17:30:12 -0700
Received: from redtail.med.unc.edu (redtail.med.unc.edu [152.19.4.7])
by mxu3.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id RAA23709
for <[email protected]>; Thu, 19 Oct 2000 17:30:12 -0700
Received: from pc523h7-01.med.unc.edu (pc523h7-01.med.unc.edu [152.19.59.130])
by redtail.med.unc.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id UAA22457
for <[email protected]>; Thu, 19 Oct 2000 20:30:11 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <Pine.WNT.4.20.0010192026120.-2028079-100000@pc523h7-01.med.unc.edu>
Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2000 20:30:11 -0400 (EDT)
Sender: [email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
From: "Christopher F. Martin" <[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Sort order INBOX/folder
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
X-X-Sender: [email protected]
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN

On Thu, 19 Oct 2000, Dan Peterson wrote:

> Is there anyway to use a different sort order in my INBOX (or INBOX) and
> folders?
>
> I like to have my INBOX sorted by "arrival", so I can look at the bottom
> to see what the latest mail is.
>
> Often times I let email (that I'm supposed to do something with) sit in my
> inbox for a while, before I save it to a folder. But when I go look in
> the folder, it appears the "arrival" date is the date it was saved in the
> folder, not the date it originally received in the INBOX.
>
> So, I end up sorting a folder by Date every time I go into it.
>
> It would be nice to have a default sort-order for folders (not including
> INBOX) that was by "Date", instead of "Arrival".
>
> Anyway to do that?

Along these lines, using PC-Pine 4.20, I find that when I sort non-INBOX
folders by 'Date' ($,D), I get an index sorted by true date sent, but when
I sort by 'Arrival' ($,A), it seems to ignore year so that, for instance,
April 1999 and April 2000 messages are sorted one after another, followed
by May 1999. What was the intended difference between sorting by 'Date'
versus 'Arrival'? What is the purpose of 'Arrival' ignoring year or is
this a bug?

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Christopher F. Martin
School of Medicine
Center for Gastrointestinal Biology and Disease
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Phone: 919.966.9340 Fax: 919.966.7592
email: [email protected]
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

>
> --
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
> Dan Peterson ([email protected]) - AOL, Dulles, VA 703-265-0226
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>
> --
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see:
> http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
>

From [email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 19 Oct 2000 17:43:09 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.1])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id RAA31874;
Thu, 19 Oct 2000 17:43:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from list2.u.washington.edu ([email protected] [140.142.14.165])
by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id RAA27660;
Thu, 19 Oct 2000 17:43:07 -0700
Received: from host ([email protected] [140.142.56.13])
by list2.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id RAA21672;
Thu, 19 Oct 2000 17:42:33 -0700
Received: from mxu4.u.washington.edu (mxu4.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.8])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id RAA195156
for <[email protected]>; Thu, 19 Oct 2000 17:41:42 -0700
Received: from isr5981.urh.uiuc.edu ([email protected] [130.126.211.213])
by mxu4.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id RAA31356
for <[email protected]>; Thu, 19 Oct 2000 17:41:41 -0700
Received: (qmail 59602 invoked by uid 1000); 20 Oct 2000 00:41:41 -0000
Received: from localhost ([email protected])
by localhost with SMTP; 20 Oct 2000 00:41:41 -0000
Message-Id: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0010191938320.59591-100000@palanthas.neverending.org>
Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2000 19:41:39 -0500 (CDT)
Sender: [email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
From: Frank Tobin <[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Sort order INBOX/folder
In-Reply-To: <Pine.WNT.4.20.0010192026120.-2028079-100000@pc523h7-01.med.unc.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-To: "Christopher F. Martin" <[email protected]>
X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
X-Sender: [email protected]
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Christopher F. Martin, at 20:30 -0400 on Thu, 19 Oct 2000, wrote:

> Along these lines, using PC-Pine 4.20, I find that when I sort
> non-INBOX folders by 'Date' ($,D), I get an index sorted by true date
> sent, but when I sort by 'Arrival' ($,A), it seems to ignore year so
> that, for instance, April 1999 and April 2000 messages are sorted one
> after another, followed by May 1999. What was the intended difference
> between sorting by 'Date' versus 'Arrival'? What is the purpose of
> 'Arrival' ignoring year or is this a bug?

Arrival is the order in which messages exist in your Inbox as-is; this box
is simply appended to when new messages arrive. When sorting by arrival,
Pine likely does not look at any headers whatesover, including the Date.

Sorting by date is sorting by the time which a message was sent.

Both of these bits of information can be found by looking into the help of
the sort-key option in the Configuration.

- --
Frank Tobin http://www.uiuc.edu/~ftobin/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (FreeBSD)
Comment: pgpenvelope 2.9.0 - http://pgpenvelope.sourceforge.net/

iEYEARECAAYFAjnvlMUACgkQVv/RCiYMT6Pi/ACeOrHNIxyCmM0ZXiJUVkLn0x44
f4kAnAiGGxR5Fhvh9lLNxp7LXZMq+cBi
=sy3+
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

From [email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 19 Oct 2000 17:44:35 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id RAA00307;
Thu, 19 Oct 2000 17:44:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from list4.u.washington.edu ([email protected] [140.142.14.167])
by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id RAA09358;
Thu, 19 Oct 2000 17:44:32 -0700
Received: from host ([email protected] [140.142.56.13])
by list4.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id RAA18004;
Thu, 19 Oct 2000 17:44:02 -0700
Received: from mxu3.u.washington.edu (mxu3.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.7])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id RAA83504
for <[email protected]>; Thu, 19 Oct 2000 17:43:21 -0700
Received: from isr5981.urh.uiuc.edu ([email protected] [130.126.211.213])
by mxu3.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id RAA25460
for <[email protected]>; Thu, 19 Oct 2000 17:43:20 -0700
Received: (qmail 59614 invoked by uid 1000); 20 Oct 2000 00:43:20 -0000
Received: from localhost ([email protected])
by localhost with SMTP; 20 Oct 2000 00:43:20 -0000
Message-Id: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0010191941460.59591-100000@palanthas.neverending.org>
Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2000 19:43:19 -0500 (CDT)
Sender: [email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
From: Frank Tobin <[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Sort order INBOX/folder
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-To: Dan Peterson <[email protected]>
X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
X-Sender: [email protected]
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Dan Peterson, at 19:55 -0400 on Thu, 19 Oct 2000, wrote:

> I like to have my INBOX sorted by "arrival", so I can look at the bottom
> to see what the latest mail is.

According to the help of the "sort-key" option in the Configuration (Main
Menu->Setup->Configuaration), arrival is the default, but it might have
been overriden by a global configuaration for your system, so you can just
re-set your sorting desire in the "sort-key" option.

- --
Frank Tobin http://www.uiuc.edu/~ftobin/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (FreeBSD)
Comment: pgpenvelope 2.9.0 - http://pgpenvelope.sourceforge.net/

iEYEARECAAYFAjnvlSgACgkQVv/RCiYMT6MOkwCeIRj5OQEOyolcwGyKnOQi6eY/
MbAAoIDQPurXo0CdeRWwzA/Cqhb8b8N8
=mNTA
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

From [email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 19 Oct 2000 18:25:23 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id SAA13420;
Thu, 19 Oct 2000 18:25:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from list4.u.washington.edu ([email protected] [140.142.14.167])
by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id SAA10254;
Thu, 19 Oct 2000 18:25:21 -0700
Received: from host ([email protected] [140.142.56.13])
by list4.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id SAA22630;
Thu, 19 Oct 2000 18:24:40 -0700
Received: from mxu1.u.washington.edu (mxu1.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.8])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id SAA125108
for <[email protected]>; Thu, 19 Oct 2000 18:24:03 -0700
Received: from euler.math.washington.edu (euler.math.washington.edu [128.95.224.1])
by mxu1.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id SAA26120
for <[email protected]>; Thu, 19 Oct 2000 18:24:03 -0700
Received: from goedel2.math.washington.edu (goedel2.math.washington.edu [128.95.224.11])
by euler.math.washington.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id SAA167215;
Thu, 19 Oct 2000 18:24:01 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <Pine.OSF.4.29.99999.0010191804120.223141-100000@goedel2.math.washington.edu>
Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2000 18:24:01 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: [email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
From: Eduardo Chappa <[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Sort order INBOX/folder
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-To: Dan Peterson <[email protected]>
X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN

*** Dan Peterson ([email protected]) wrote today:

:) Is there anyway to use a different sort order in my INBOX (or INBOX) and
:) folders?

You can use a patch that I wrote which allows you to do this, (pick the
patch from the address in my signature). It is called "define your own
rules... etc", and in particular you can define specific sort orders for
specific folders, so for example you can have any newsgroup sorted by
OrderedSubject, Inbox, sorted by arrival and saved-messages sorted by
date.

Once you apply the patch you have to add to your "new-rules"
configuration variables some rules that specify which action is to be
taken. You can add as many rules as you like, only the first one which is
satisfied at any time will be executed.

For example, this one sorts every folder that is not INBOX by Date.
INBOX will be sorted in the way you specify your default sort, which
is usually by Arrival

_FOLDER_ != {INBOX} => _SORT_{Date}

or this sorts every newsgroup by OrderedSubject

_FOLDER_ == {_NEWS_} => _SORT_{OrderedSubj}

or this sorts saved-messages by From

_FOLDER_ == {saved-messages} => _SORT_{From}

etc, there are much more things you can do with it. I have much more
examples in my web page.

--
Eduardo
http://www.math.washington.edu/~chappa/pine/

From [email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 19 Oct 2000 19:54:04 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.1])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id TAA26955;
Thu, 19 Oct 2000 19:54:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from list3.u.washington.edu ([email protected] [140.142.8.100])
by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id TAA30238;
Thu, 19 Oct 2000 19:54:02 -0700
Received: from host ([email protected] [140.142.56.13])
by list3.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id TAA34590;
Thu, 19 Oct 2000 19:53:13 -0700
Received: from mxu2.u.washington.edu (mxu2.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.9])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id TAA132112
for <[email protected]>; Thu, 19 Oct 2000 19:52:31 -0700
Received: from fester.comp-u-port.net (IDENT:[email protected] [207.89.149.61])
by mxu2.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id TAA17939
for <[email protected]>; Thu, 19 Oct 2000 19:52:30 -0700
Received: from pugsley.comp-u-port.net (pugsley.comp-u-port.net [207.89.149.34])
by fester.comp-u-port.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id WAA31127
for <[email protected]>; Thu, 19 Oct 2000 22:52:22 -0400
Message-Id: <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2000 22:52:21 -0400 (Eastern Daylight Time)
Sender: [email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
From: Pine-info <[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: PC-Pine 4.21 attachment path size limit?
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-Sender: [email protected]
X-To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN

Dear Pine developers:

Since I am seeing talk about a pending release of Pine 4.30 and
have not heard anything about my post of Oct 4th
<http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/2000.10/msg00078.html>, I
was wondering if this bug (IMO) has been noted and corrected.

Thanks.

--
*******************************************************************
Derek Diget
*******************************************************************

From [email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 19 Oct 2000 20:21:55 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id UAA09671;
Thu, 19 Oct 2000 20:21:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from list4.u.washington.edu ([email protected] [140.142.14.167])
by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id UAA12540;
Thu, 19 Oct 2000 20:21:54 -0700
Received: from host ([email protected] [140.142.56.13])
by list4.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id UAA13890;
Thu, 19 Oct 2000 20:21:04 -0700
Received: from mxu4.u.washington.edu (mxu4.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.8])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id UAA116036
for <[email protected]>; Thu, 19 Oct 2000 20:20:22 -0700
Received: from mxout2.cac.washington.edu (mxout2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.4])
by mxu4.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id UAA19129
for <[email protected]>; Thu, 19 Oct 2000 20:20:22 -0700
Received: from mailhost2.u.washington.edu (mailhost2.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.2])
by mxout2.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id UAA17340;
Thu, 19 Oct 2000 20:20:22 -0700
Received: from jfranklin_ndc.nebula.washington.edu (D-128-95-135-224.dhcp.washington.edu [128.95.135.224])
by mailhost2.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id UAA24218;
Thu, 19 Oct 2000 20:20:22 -0700
Message-Id: <Pine.WNT.4.30.0010192009590.1020-100000@jfranklin_ndc.nebula.washington.edu>
Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2000 20:20:22 -0700 (Pacific Daylight Time)
Sender: [email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
From: Jeff Franklin <[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: PC-Pine 4.21 attachment path size limit?
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-To: Pine-info <[email protected]>
X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
X-X-Sender: [email protected]
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN

On Thu, 19 Oct 2000, Pine-info wrote:

> Since I am seeing talk about a pending release of Pine 4.30 and
> have not heard anything about my post of Oct 4th
> <http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/2000.10/msg00078.html>, I
> was wondering if this bug (IMO) has been noted and corrected.

Hi Derek,

We are aware of this problem, and it is on the list of things to consider
for a future release. In 4.30, you will be able to use the "^To Files"
dialog to attach files whose name contain more than 80 characters (which
you couldn't do in 4.21), but you still will not be able to type in
attachments longer than that. I think that the dialog will be sufficient
for most cases (and hopefully yours), but those who will wish to manually
type in file paths of longer than 80 characters will still be stuck.

Jeff

--
Jeff Franklin <[email protected]>
Networks and Distributed Computing University of Washington

From [email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 19 Oct 2000 20:58:22 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.1])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id UAA31165;
Thu, 19 Oct 2000 20:58:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from list4.u.washington.edu ([email protected] [140.142.14.167])
by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id UAA31573;
Thu, 19 Oct 2000 20:58:21 -0700
Received: from host ([email protected] [140.142.56.13])
by list4.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id UAA32710;
Thu, 19 Oct 2000 20:57:16 -0700
Received: from mxu3.u.washington.edu (mxu3.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.7])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id UAA83568
for <[email protected]>; Thu, 19 Oct 2000 20:56:29 -0700
Received: from fester.comp-u-port.net (IDENT:[email protected] [207.89.149.61])
by mxu3.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id UAA15261
for <[email protected]>; Thu, 19 Oct 2000 20:56:28 -0700
Received: from pugsley.comp-u-port.net (pugsley.comp-u-port.net [207.89.149.34])
by fester.comp-u-port.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA31446
for <[email protected]>; Thu, 19 Oct 2000 23:56:20 -0400
Message-Id: <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2000 23:56:19 -0400 (Eastern Daylight Time)
Sender: [email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
From: Pine-info <[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: PC-Pine 4.21 attachment path size limit?
In-Reply-To: <Pine.WNT.4.30.0010192009590.1020-100000@jfranklin_ndc.nebula.washington.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-Sender: [email protected]
X-To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN

On Oct 19, 2000 at 20:20, Jeff Franklin wrote:
=>On Thu, 19 Oct 2000, Pine-info wrote:
=>> Since I am seeing talk about a pending release of Pine 4.30 and
=>> have not heard anything about my post of Oct 4th
=>> <http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/2000.10/msg00078.html>, I
=>> was wondering if this bug (IMO) has been noted and corrected.
=>
=>We are aware of this problem, and it is on the list of things to consider
=>for a future release. In 4.30, you will be able to use the "^To Files"
=>dialog to attach files whose name contain more than 80 characters (which
=>you couldn't do in 4.21), but you still will not be able to type in
=>attachments longer than that. I think that the dialog will be sufficient
=>for most cases (and hopefully yours), but those who will wish to manually
=>type in file paths of longer than 80 characters will still be stuck.

First, thanks for the reply.

Let me see if I understand your post.

In v4.30+ user should be able to attach files using the "^To
Files" dialog with a path (and filename/extension) over 80 characters,
but you will not be able to type straight into the attchmnt line the
the same file (path/filename/extension over 80 characters).

(I attach through the "^To Files" dialog anyways. :)

--
*******************************************************************
Derek Diget
*******************************************************************

From [email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 19 Oct 2000 21:14:12 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id VAA20484;
Thu, 19 Oct 2000 21:14:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from list2.u.washington.edu ([email protected] [140.142.14.165])
by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id VAA13583;
Thu, 19 Oct 2000 21:14:11 -0700
Received: from host ([email protected] [140.142.56.13])
by list2.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id VAA40868;
Thu, 19 Oct 2000 21:13:24 -0700
Received: from mxu2.u.washington.edu (mxu2.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.9])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id VAA22528
for <[email protected]>; Thu, 19 Oct 2000 21:12:38 -0700
Received: from mxout1.cac.washington.edu (mxout1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.5])
by mxu2.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id VAA26826
for <[email protected]>; Thu, 19 Oct 2000 21:12:38 -0700
Received: from mailhost1.u.washington.edu (mailhost1.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.2])
by mxout1.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id VAA06423;
Thu, 19 Oct 2000 21:12:38 -0700
Received: from jfranklin_ndc.nebula.washington.edu (D-128-95-135-224.dhcp.washington.edu [128.95.135.224])
by mailhost1.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id VAA02064;
Thu, 19 Oct 2000 21:12:38 -0700
Message-Id: <Pine.WNT.4.30.0010192103350.1020-100000@jfranklin_ndc.nebula.washington.edu>
Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2000 21:12:38 -0700 (Pacific Daylight Time)
Sender: [email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
From: Jeff Franklin <[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: PC-Pine 4.21 attachment path size limit?
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-To: Pine-info <[email protected]>
X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
X-X-Sender: [email protected]
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN

On Thu, 19 Oct 2000, Pine-info wrote:

> Let me see if I understand your post.
>
> In v4.30+ user should be able to attach files using the "^To
> Files" dialog with a path (and filename/extension) over 80 characters,
> but you will not be able to type straight into the attchmnt line the
> the same file (path/filename/extension over 80 characters).

Exactly. You understood me correctly. The 80 character thing is a
limitation of pico, which currently has no way of handling the typing of
characters longer than the screen's width for something like attachments.

> (I attach through the "^To Files" dialog anyways. :)

I thought so. :)

Jeff

From [email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Fri, 20 Oct 2000 06:31:42 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.1])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id GAA19184;
Fri, 20 Oct 2000 06:31:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from list2.u.washington.edu ([email protected] [140.142.14.165])
by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id GAA09287;
Fri, 20 Oct 2000 06:31:40 -0700
Received: from host ([email protected] [140.142.56.13])
by list2.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id GAA40788;
Fri, 20 Oct 2000 06:31:08 -0700
Received: from mxu4.u.washington.edu (mxu4.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.8])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id GAA179490
for <[email protected]>; Fri, 20 Oct 2000 06:30:00 -0700
Received: from gort.office.aol.com (pix-fw.wan.aol.com [152.163.190.1])
by mxu4.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id GAA05319
for <[email protected]>; Fri, 20 Oct 2000 06:29:59 -0700
Received: from DBPETE (nikto [10.2.107.233]) by gort.office.aol.com with ESMTP (8.7.1/8.7.1) id JAA08572; Fri, 20 Oct 2000 09:29:24 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2000 09:29:23 -0400 (Eastern Daylight Time)
Sender: [email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
From: Dan Peterson <[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Sort order INBOX/folder
In-Reply-To: <Pine.OSF.4.29.99999.0010191804120.223141-100000@goedel2.math.washington.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-To: Eduardo Chappa <[email protected]>
X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
X-X-Sender: [email protected]
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN

On Thu, 19 Oct 2000, Eduardo Chappa wrote:

> *** Dan Peterson ([email protected]) wrote today:
>
> :) Is there anyway to use a different sort order in my INBOX (or INBOX) and
> :) folders?
>
> You can use a patch that I wrote which allows you to do this, (pick
> the patch from the address in my signature). It is called "define your
> own rules... etc", and in particular you can define specific sort
> orders for specific folders, so for example you can have any newsgroup
> sorted by OrderedSubject, Inbox, sorted by arrival and saved-messages
> sorted by date.
>
> Once you apply the patch you have to add to your "new-rules"
> configuration variables some rules that specify which action is to be
> taken. You can add as many rules as you like, only the first one which
> is satisfied at any time will be executed.
>
> For example, this one sorts every folder that is not INBOX by Date.
> INBOX will be sorted in the way you specify your default sort, which
> is usually by Arrival
>
> _FOLDER_ != {INBOX} => _SORT_{Date}
>
> or this sorts every newsgroup by OrderedSubject
>
> _FOLDER_ == {_NEWS_} => _SORT_{OrderedSubj}
>
> or this sorts saved-messages by From
>
> _FOLDER_ == {saved-messages} => _SORT_{From}
>
> etc, there are much more things you can do with it. I have much more
> examples in my web page.

This sounds very cool. Unfortunately, I'm once again hampered by the fact
that I'm using PC-PINE and don't have the source.

Why is it the source for PC-PINE isn't available?

From [email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Fri, 20 Oct 2000 07:30:29 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.1])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id HAA12884;
Fri, 20 Oct 2000 07:30:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from list4.u.washington.edu ([email protected] [140.142.14.167])
by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id HAA10411;
Fri, 20 Oct 2000 07:30:28 -0700
Received: from host ([email protected] [140.142.56.13])
by list4.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id HAA21208;
Fri, 20 Oct 2000 07:29:58 -0700
Received: from mxu4.u.washington.edu (mxu4.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.8])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id HAA202714
for <[email protected]>; Fri, 20 Oct 2000 07:29:08 -0700
Received: from usceast.cs.sc.edu (usceast.cs.sc.edu [129.252.11.9])
by mxu4.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id HAA11485
for <[email protected]>; Fri, 20 Oct 2000 07:29:07 -0700
Received: from pearl.cs.sc.edu (pearl.cs.sc.edu [129.252.130.40])
by usceast.cs.sc.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA50314;
Fri, 20 Oct 2000 10:29:01 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2000 10:29:00 -0400 (EDT)
Sender: [email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
From: Gopi Sundaram <[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Sort order INBOX/folder
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-To: Dan Peterson <[email protected]>
X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN

On Fri, 20 Oct 2000, Dan Peterson wrote:

> Why is it the source for PC-PINE isn't available?

There's a copyright issue with the bundled spellchecker, tha tonly
allows for binary distribution.

--
Gopi Sundaram
[email protected]
http://www.cse.sc.edu/~gopalan/Pine/

From [email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Fri, 20 Oct 2000 08:24:24 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.1])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id IAA16451;
Fri, 20 Oct 2000 08:24:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from list3.u.washington.edu ([email protected] [140.142.8.100])
by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id IAA11784;
Fri, 20 Oct 2000 08:24:22 -0700
Received: from host ([email protected] [140.142.56.13])
by list3.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id IAA42028;
Fri, 20 Oct 2000 08:23:42 -0700
Received: from mxu3.u.washington.edu (mxu3.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.7])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id IAA202640
for <[email protected]>; Fri, 20 Oct 2000 08:22:22 -0700
Received: from smtp01.primenet.com (smtp01.primenet.com [206.165.6.131])
by mxu3.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id IAA10727
for <[email protected]>; Fri, 20 Oct 2000 08:22:21 -0700
Received: (from daemon@localhost)
by smtp01.primenet.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id IAA05533;
Fri, 20 Oct 2000 08:21:30 -0700 (MST)
Received: from usr09.primenet.com(206.165.6.209)
via SMTP by smtp01.primenet.com, id smtpdAAAlBaOQh; Fri Oct 20 08:16:36 2000
Received: from localhost (fairall@localhost)
by usr09.primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id IAA20497;
Fri, 20 Oct 2000 08:17:25 -0700 (MST)
Message-Id: <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2000 11:17:24 -0400 (EDT)
Sender: [email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
From: Leslie Fairall <[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
Subject: RE: PINE format string vulnerabilities
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GUL.4.30.0010191151430.19134-100000@shiva2.cac.washington.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-To: Steve Hubert <[email protected]>
X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
X-Authentication-Warning: usr09.primenet.com: fairall owned process doing -bs
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN

Why is pine on a forbidden list? What list is this?

***** **************************************************
"Contrary to popular belief, Unix is user friendly. It's just very
particular about who it makes friends with."
mailto:[email protected]

From [email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Fri, 20 Oct 2000 08:37:36 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id IAA21988;
Fri, 20 Oct 2000 08:37:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from list3.u.washington.edu ([email protected] [140.142.8.100])
by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id IAA26347;
Fri, 20 Oct 2000 08:37:35 -0700
Received: from host ([email protected] [140.142.56.13])
by list3.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id IAA14468;
Fri, 20 Oct 2000 08:36:55 -0700
Received: from mxu2.u.washington.edu (mxu2.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.9])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id IAA119214
for <[email protected]>; Fri, 20 Oct 2000 08:35:29 -0700
Received: from smtp.tznet.com (smtp.tznet.com [206.31.5.6])
by mxu2.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id IAA20727
for <[email protected]>; Fri, 20 Oct 2000 08:35:14 -0700
Received: from darkangel.gothic.com ([205.216.111.170]) by smtp.tznet.com
with ESMTP (IPAD 2.52/64) id 4143000; Fri, 20 Oct 2000 10:35:05 -0500
Received: by darkangel.gothic.com (Postfix, from userid 1001)
id 8684FA7; Fri, 20 Oct 2000 10:42:27 -0500 (CDT)
Message-Id: <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2000 10:42:27 -0500
Sender: [email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
From: Michael Urban <[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: PINE format string vulnerabilities
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>; from [email protected] on Fri, Oct 20, 2000 at 11:17:24AM -0400
References: <Pine.GUL.4.30.0010191151430.19134-100000@shiva2.cac.washington.edu> <[email protected]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
X-To: Leslie Fairall <[email protected]>
X-Cc: [email protected]
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN

Pine is currently on the forbidden list in the FreeBSD ports
collection because of a buffer overflow bug in the From field. In a
nutshell, a very long from header will overflow a buffer in Pine,
causing it to crash. The problem with this is that a when the buffer
overflows, it can allow the attacker to execute arbitrary code on
your system. All he has to do is send a malicious email message that
overflows Pine's buffer.

This is, unfortunatly, only one of many thousands of potential
vulnerabilites in Pine, so I doubt that fixing this one problem will
get it off the forbidden list.

I would like to see Pine fixed since I really like Pine. However,
right now, I am using Mutt just to be safe.

A potential way around this problem pending fixing of Pine is to have
an MDA such as procmail filter messages with malicious headers
prior to delivery.

On Fri, Oct 20, 2000 at 11:17:24AM -0400, Leslie Fairall wrote:
> Why is pine on a forbidden list? What list is this?
>
>
>
> ***** **************************************************
> "Contrary to popular belief, Unix is user friendly. It's just very
> particular about who it makes friends with."
> mailto:[email protected]
>

From [email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Fri, 20 Oct 2000 09:33:10 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id JAA09999;
Fri, 20 Oct 2000 09:33:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from list1.u.washington.edu ([email protected] [140.142.8.99])
by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id JAA28005;
Fri, 20 Oct 2000 09:33:09 -0700
Received: from host ([email protected] [140.142.56.13])
by list1.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id JAA18642;
Fri, 20 Oct 2000 09:32:25 -0700
Received: from mxu3.u.washington.edu (mxu3.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.7])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id JAA179504
for <[email protected]>; Fri, 20 Oct 2000 09:31:29 -0700
Received: from fw1.uhc.com (gw.uhc.com [168.183.16.135])
by mxu3.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id JAA23802
for <[email protected]>; Fri, 20 Oct 2000 09:31:27 -0700
Received: from fw1.uhc.com (root@localhost)
by fw1.uhc.com with ESMTP id LAA04433
for <[email protected]>; Fri, 20 Oct 2000 11:31:23 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from pike.uhc.com (pike.uhc.com [168.183.51.8])
by fw1.uhc.com with ESMTP id LAB04429
for <[email protected]>; Fri, 20 Oct 2000 11:31:23 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from umw5002638 (UMW5002638.uhc.com [10.12.149.57]) by pike.uhc.com (AIX4.2/UCB 8.7/8.7) with SMTP id LAA503324 for <[email protected]>; Fri, 20 Oct 2000 11:31:21 -0500 (CDT)
Message-Id: <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2000 11:30:43 -0500
Sender: [email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
From: "Jonathan Hutchins" <[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
Subject: Pine IMAP with MS Exchange 5.5
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-To: "Pine Discussion Forum" <[email protected]>
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6600
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN

I'm running Pine on RHLinux 6.2, and one of the things I'd like to access is
the mail on my local MS Exchange (5.5) server. I've conferred Pine to
include the server via IMAP. I can see all of the folders for my Exchange
account, and I can seem mail in subfolders, but I can't see any mail in the
primary "Inbox" folder. Most, but not all of my folders are sub-folders of
the Inbox.

--
-----------------------------------------------------------------
For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see:
http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/
-----------------------------------------------------------------

From [email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Fri, 20 Oct 2000 09:38:29 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.1])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id JAA21528;
Fri, 20 Oct 2000 09:38:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from list3.u.washington.edu ([email protected] [140.142.8.100])
by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id JAA14034;
Fri, 20 Oct 2000 09:38:27 -0700
Received: from host ([email protected] [140.142.56.13])
by list3.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id JAA37792;
Fri, 20 Oct 2000 09:37:58 -0700
Received: from mxu1.u.washington.edu (mxu1.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.8])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id JAA42344
for <[email protected]>; Fri, 20 Oct 2000 09:36:48 -0700
Received: from localhost.edlund.org (m96.ryd.student.liu.se [130.236.214.96])
by mxu1.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id JAA23759
for <[email protected]>; Fri, 20 Oct 2000 09:36:47 -0700
Received: by localhost.edlund.org (Postfix, from userid 500)
id 24A4241052; Fri, 20 Oct 2000 18:36:43 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by localhost.edlund.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 2203741051; Fri, 20 Oct 2000 18:36:43 +0200 (CEST)
Message-Id: <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2000 18:36:43 +0200 (CEST)
Sender: [email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
From: Henrik Edlund <[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: PINE format string vulnerabilities
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-To: Michael Urban <[email protected]>
X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN

On Fri, 20 Oct 2000, Michael Urban wrote:

> A potential way around this problem pending fixing of Pine is to have
> an MDA such as procmail filter messages with malicious headers
> prior to delivery.

Do you have a good procmail rule to kill mails with too long (for
Pine) header lines?

TIA, Henrik

--
Henrik Edlund (HE2914-RIPE)
http://www.edlund.org/

"Never implement limitations."
-- Henrik Edlund

From [email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Fri, 20 Oct 2000 09:48:49 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.1])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id JAA16744;
Fri, 20 Oct 2000 09:48:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from list1.u.washington.edu ([email protected] [140.142.8.99])
by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id JAA14322;
Fri, 20 Oct 2000 09:48:47 -0700
Received: from host ([email protected] [140.142.56.13])
by list1.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id JAA40224;
Fri, 20 Oct 2000 09:48:11 -0700
Received: from mxu4.u.washington.edu (mxu4.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.8])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id JAA151712
for <[email protected]>; Fri, 20 Oct 2000 09:47:07 -0700
Received: from smtp.tznet.com (smtp.tznet.com [206.31.5.6])
by mxu4.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id JAA03510
for <[email protected]>; Fri, 20 Oct 2000 09:47:07 -0700
Received: from darkangel.gothic.com ([205.216.111.170]) by smtp.tznet.com
with ESMTP (IPAD 2.52/64) id 4183100; Fri, 20 Oct 2000 11:47:03 -0500
Received: by darkangel.gothic.com (Postfix, from userid 1001)
id CA2134E; Fri, 20 Oct 2000 11:54:29 -0500 (CDT)
Message-Id: <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2000 11:54:29 -0500
Sender: [email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
From: Michael Urban <[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: PINE format string vulnerabilities
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>; from [email protected] on Fri, Oct 20, 2000 at 06:36:43PM +0200
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
X-To: Henrik Edlund <[email protected]>
X-Cc: [email protected]
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN

Unfortunately, I don't. But I can point you to a web resource that I
think will probably be very helpful. I haven't actually read most of
this web site, but it does look like it addresses the issue.

http://www.impsec.org/email-tools/procmail-security.html

Hope that URL helps you out some.

On Fri, Oct 20, 2000 at 06:36:43PM +0200, Henrik Edlund wrote:
> On Fri, 20 Oct 2000, Michael Urban wrote:
>
> > A potential way around this problem pending fixing of Pine is to have
> > an MDA such as procmail filter messages with malicious headers
> > prior to delivery.
>
> Do you have a good procmail rule to kill mails with too long (for
> Pine) header lines?
>
> TIA, Henrik
>
> --
> Henrik Edlund (HE2914-RIPE)
> http://www.edlund.org/
>
> "Never implement limitations."
> -- Henrik Edlund
>

From [email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Fri, 20 Oct 2000 09:52:43 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id JAA15017;
Fri, 20 Oct 2000 09:52:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from list2.u.washington.edu ([email protected] [140.142.14.165])
by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id JAA28595;
Fri, 20 Oct 2000 09:52:42 -0700
Received: from host ([email protected] [140.142.56.13])
by list2.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id JAA30026;
Fri, 20 Oct 2000 09:52:10 -0700
Received: from mxu4.u.washington.edu (mxu4.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.8])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id JAA42346
for <[email protected]>; Fri, 20 Oct 2000 09:51:21 -0700
Received: from smtp.tznet.com (smtp.tznet.com [206.31.5.6])
by mxu4.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id JAA04766
for <[email protected]>; Fri, 20 Oct 2000 09:51:20 -0700
Received: from darkangel.gothic.com ([205.216.111.170]) by smtp.tznet.com
with ESMTP (IPAD 2.52/64) id 4185400; Fri, 20 Oct 2000 11:51:16 -0500
Received: by darkangel.gothic.com (Postfix, from userid 1001)
id 65BFB4E; Fri, 20 Oct 2000 11:58:43 -0500 (CDT)
Message-Id: <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2000 11:58:43 -0500
Sender: [email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
From: Michael Urban <[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: PINE format string vulnerabilities
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>; from [email protected] on Fri, Oct 20, 2000 at 10:42:27AM -0500
References: <Pine.GUL.4.30.0010191151430.19134-100000@shiva2.cac.washington.edu> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
X-To: Leslie Fairall <[email protected]>
X-Cc: [email protected]
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN

Oh. Something else I should mention just to make sure there is no
misunderstanding.

These bugs are not limitted to FreeBSD. They affect Pine running on
all platforms. FreeBSD just does a reasonably good job of warning
their users about bugs in applications and not just the OS itself.

On Fri, Oct 20, 2000 at 10:42:27AM -0500, Michael Urban wrote:
> Pine is currently on the forbidden list in the FreeBSD ports
> collection because of a buffer overflow bug in the From field. In a
> nutshell, a very long from header will overflow a buffer in Pine,
> causing it to crash. The problem with this is that a when the buffer
> overflows, it can allow the attacker to execute arbitrary code on
> your system. All he has to do is send a malicious email message that
> overflows Pine's buffer.
>
> This is, unfortunatly, only one of many thousands of potential
> vulnerabilites in Pine, so I doubt that fixing this one problem will
> get it off the forbidden list.
>
> I would like to see Pine fixed since I really like Pine. However,
> right now, I am using Mutt just to be safe.
>
> A potential way around this problem pending fixing of Pine is to have
> an MDA such as procmail filter messages with malicious headers
> prior to delivery.
>
> On Fri, Oct 20, 2000 at 11:17:24AM -0400, Leslie Fairall wrote:
> > Why is pine on a forbidden list? What list is this?
> >
> >
> >
> > ***** **************************************************
> > "Contrary to popular belief, Unix is user friendly. It's just very
> > particular about who it makes friends with."
> > mailto:[email protected]
> >

From [email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Sun, 22 Oct 2000 13:36:00 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id NAA25254;
Sun, 22 Oct 2000 13:35:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from list3.u.washington.edu ([email protected] [140.142.8.100])
by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id NAA20427;
Sun, 22 Oct 2000 13:35:58 -0700
Received: from host ([email protected] [140.142.56.13])
by list3.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id NAA37824;
Sun, 22 Oct 2000 13:34:48 -0700
Received: from mxu1.u.washington.edu (mxu1.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.8])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id NAA187504
for <[email protected]>; Sun, 22 Oct 2000 13:31:42 -0700
Received: from vger.timpanogas.org ([email protected] [207.109.151.240])
by mxu1.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id NAA10739
for <[email protected]>; Sun, 22 Oct 2000 13:31:41 -0700
Received: from asdf.capslock.lan (SSMarie-ppp111273.sympatico.ca [216.209.120.172])
by vger.timpanogas.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA03837
for <[email protected]>; Sun, 22 Oct 2000 14:28:29 -0600
Received: from localhost (mharris@localhost)
by asdf.capslock.lan (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA08579
for <[email protected]>; Sun, 22 Oct 2000 16:31:37 -0400
Message-Id: <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 22 Oct 2000 16:31:37 -0400 (EDT)
Sender: [email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
From: "Mike A. Harris" <[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
Subject: [BUG] PINE crash with HTML message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-Authentication-Warning: asdf.capslock.lan: mharris owned process doing -bs
X-Sender: [email protected]
X-Unexpected-Header: The Spanish Inquisition
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN

I have an HTML SPAM message which some arsehole sent me that
causes PINE 4.21 to crash if I try to forward it. Who do I send
this bug report to, and will a bug fix be made if I do?

The message is multipart MIME.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Mike A. Harris - Linux advocate - Open source advocate
Computer Consultant - Capslock Consulting
Copyright 2000 all rights reserved
----------------------------------------------------------------------

#[Mike A. Harris bash tip #2 - custom colorized bash prompts]
# For a color prompt, put the following at the bottom of your ~/.bash_profile
TTYNAME=$(tty | sed -e 's/^\/dev\///' -e 's/^tty//');DRED=31;DGREEN=32
BROWN=33;DBLUE=34;DMAGENTA=35;DCYAN=36;GREY=37;DGREY=30\;1;RED=31\;1
GREEN=32\;1;YELLOW=33\;1;BLUE=34\;1;MAGENTA=35\;1;CYAN=36\;1;WHITE=37\;1
CLRUSER=$CYAN ; CLRHOST=$YELLOW # Set the user and host colors here
PS1="$TTYNAME \[\033[${CLRUSER}m\]\u\[\033[0;m\]"
export PS1="${PS1}@\[\033[${CLRHOST}m\]\h\\[\033[0;m\]:\w\$ "

--
-----------------------------------------------------------------
For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see:
http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/
-----------------------------------------------------------------

From [email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Sun, 22 Oct 2000 13:37:54 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id NAA11791;
Sun, 22 Oct 2000 13:37:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from list1.u.washington.edu ([email protected] [140.142.8.99])
by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id NAA20457;
Sun, 22 Oct 2000 13:37:52 -0700
Received: from host ([email protected] [140.142.56.13])
by list1.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id NAA38930;
Sun, 22 Oct 2000 13:37:14 -0700
Received: from mxu4.u.washington.edu (mxu4.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.8])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id NAA81080
for <[email protected]>; Sun, 22 Oct 2000 13:34:22 -0700
Received: from vger.timpanogas.org ([email protected] [207.109.151.240])
by mxu4.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id NAA14036
for <[email protected]>; Sun, 22 Oct 2000 13:34:21 -0700
Received: from asdf.capslock.lan (SSMarie-ppp111273.sympatico.ca [216.209.120.172])
by vger.timpanogas.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA03853
for <[email protected]>; Sun, 22 Oct 2000 14:31:09 -0600
Received: from localhost (mharris@localhost)
by asdf.capslock.lan (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA08588
for <[email protected]>; Sun, 22 Oct 2000 16:34:18 -0400
Message-Id: <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 22 Oct 2000 16:34:18 -0400 (EDT)
Sender: [email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
From: "Mike A. Harris" <[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
Subject: [BUG] PINE crash exit message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
X-Authentication-Warning: asdf.capslock.lan: mharris owned process doing -bs
X-Sender: [email protected]
X-Unexpected-Header: The Spanish Inquisition
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN

My previous post about PINE crashing, I forgot to add the error
message:

Problem detected: "Received abort signal".
Pine Exiting.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Mike A. Harris - Linux advocate - Open source advocate
Computer Consultant - Capslock Consulting
Copyright 2000 all rights reserved
----------------------------------------------------------------------

So, if anybody wants to have free hardware sent to them, don't call me, but
instead write your own operating system. It has worked every time for me.

Linus Torvalds

--
-----------------------------------------------------------------
For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see:
http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/
-----------------------------------------------------------------

From [email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Sun, 22 Oct 2000 21:43:17 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id VAA08568;
Sun, 22 Oct 2000 21:43:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from list1.u.washington.edu ([email protected] [140.142.8.99])
by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id VAA28619;
Sun, 22 Oct 2000 21:43:15 -0700
Received: from host ([email protected] [140.142.56.13])
by list1.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id VAA35668;
Sun, 22 Oct 2000 21:37:02 -0700
Received: from mxu1.u.washington.edu (mxu1.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.8])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id VAA62882
for <[email protected]>; Sun, 22 Oct 2000 21:34:09 -0700
Received: from smtp10.atl.mindspring.net (smtp10.atl.mindspring.net [207.69.200.246])
by mxu1.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id VAA14226
for <[email protected]>; Sun, 22 Oct 2000 21:34:09 -0700
Received: from computer (user-33qse43.dialup.mindspring.com [199.174.56.131])
by smtp10.atl.mindspring.net (8.9.3/8.8.5) with SMTP id AAA05763
for <[email protected]>; Mon, 23 Oct 2000 00:34:06 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <001c01c03caa$77e24bc0$8338aec7@computer>
Date: Sun, 22 Oct 2000 23:34:00 -0500
Sender: [email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
From: "Raghuram Kalletla" <[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
Subject: problems compiling PINE in Macintosh OS X
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0019_01C03C80.8E39B180"
X-To: <[email protected]>
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2615.200
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

------=_NextPart_000_0019_01C03C80.8E39B180
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hey all,
I've been trying to install PINE on Macintosh OS X (Public =
Beta) from the command prompt without success. Does anybody on the list =
have experience in compiling PINE on Darwin? I could not find an =
appropriate port for OS X so I've used "nxt", "mct" while using the =
"./build" command and here's what I got in the end:=20
=20
Links to executables are in bin directory:
__TEXT __DATA __OBJC others dec hex
size: can't open file: bin/pine (No such file or directory)
589824 12288 0 634880 1236992 12e000 bin/mtest
634880 20480 0 688128 1343488 148000 bin/imapd
size: can't open file: bin/pico (No such file or directory)
size: can't open file: bin/pilot (No such file or directory)
Done

The other ports I tried were: aux, bsd, bsf, gen, and mac. When I used =
these, I got this message at the end of the compilation:
=20
Links to executables are in bin directory:
__TEXT __DATA __OBJC others dec hex
size: can't open file: bin/pine (No such file or directory)
size: can't open file: bin/mtest (No such file or directory)
size: can't open file: bin/imapd (No such file or directory)
size: can't open file: bin/pico (No such file or directory)
size: can't open file: bin/pilot (No such file or directory)
Done

Any help to find the appropriate port and/or tips will be appreciated.

Raghuram Kalletla

------=_NextPart_000_0019_01C03C80.8E39B180
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META content=3D"text/html; charset=3Diso-8859-1" =
http-equiv=3DContent-Type>
<META content=3D"MSHTML 5.00.2614.3500" name=3DGENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Hey all,</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial=20
size=3D2>          &nbs=
p; I've=20
been trying to install PINE on Macintosh OS X (Public Beta) from the =
command=20
prompt without success. Does anybody on the list have =
experience in=20
compiling PINE on Darwin? I could not find an appropriate port for =
OS X so=20
I've used "nxt", "mct" while using the "./build" command and here's what =
I got=20
in the end: </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Links to executables are in bin=20
directory:<BR>__TEXT  __DATA  __OBJC  others =20
dec     hex<BR>size: can't open file: bin/pine (No =
such file=20
or directory)<BR>589824  12288  =20
0       634880  1236992 12e000 =20
bin/mtest<BR>634880  20480  =20
0       688128  1343488 148000 =20
bin/imapd<BR>size: can't open file: bin/pico (No such file or=20
directory)<BR>size: can't open file: bin/pilot (No such file or=20
directory)<BR>Done</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>The other ports I tried were: aux, bsd, =
bsf, gen,=20
and mac. When I used these, I got this message at the end of the=20
compilation:</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Links to executables are in bin=20
directory:</FONT><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2><BR>__TEXT  =
__DATA =20
__OBJC  others  dec     hex<BR>size: can't =
open=20
file: bin/pine (No such file or directory)</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>size: can't open file: bin/mtest (No =
such file or=20
directory)<BR>size: can't open file: bin/imapd (No such file or=20
directory)<BR>size: can't open file: bin/pico (No such file or=20
directory)<BR>size: can't open file: bin/pilot (No such file or=20
directory)<BR>Done</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Any help to find the appropriate =
port and/or=20
tips will be appreciated.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Raghuram =
Kalletla</FONT></DIV></BODY></HTML>

------=_NextPart_000_0019_01C03C80.8E39B180--

--
-----------------------------------------------------------------
For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see:
http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/
-----------------------------------------------------------------

From [email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Sun, 22 Oct 2000 22:30:25 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.1])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id WAA32561;
Sun, 22 Oct 2000 22:30:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from list3.u.washington.edu ([email protected] [140.142.8.100])
by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id WAA15678;
Sun, 22 Oct 2000 22:30:18 -0700
Received: from host ([email protected] [140.142.56.13])
by list3.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id WAA18332;
Sun, 22 Oct 2000 22:25:27 -0700
Received: from bp15.u.washington.edu ([email protected] [140.142.15.205])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id WAA158794
for <[email protected]>; Sun, 22 Oct 2000 22:22:40 -0700
Received: from localhost (leibrand@localhost)
by bp15.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id WAA201586;
Sun, 22 Oct 2000 22:22:39 -0700
Message-Id: <Pine.A41.4.29.99999.0010222217060.79286-100000@bp15.u.washington.edu>
Date: Sun, 22 Oct 2000 22:22:38 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: [email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
From: Scott Leibrand <[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: problems compiling PINE in Macintosh OS X
In-Reply-To: <001c01c03caa$77e24bc0$8338aec7@computer>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-To: Raghuram Kalletla <[email protected]>
X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
X-Sender: <[email protected]>
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN

On Sun, 22 Oct 2000, Raghuram Kalletla wrote:

> I've been trying to install PINE on Macintosh OS X (Public
> Beta) from the command prompt without success. Does anybody on the
> list have experience in compiling PINE on Darwin? I could not find an
> appropriate port for OS X so I've used "nxt", "mct" while using the
> "./build" command and here's what I got in the end:
>
> Any help to find the appropriate port and/or tips will be appreciated.

You need to find or make an OS X port. I'd wait for 4.30, which should be
out shortly (within a couple weeks). Here's what Jeff Franklin of the
Pine team said in comp.mail.pine. For the complete thread, see
http://x60.deja.com/getdoc.xp?AN=679385979&CONTEXT=972278175.748683309&hitnum=0

On Mon, 9 Oct 2000, Jeff Franklin wrote:

> There will be a Mac OS X port in Pine 4.30. You might want to check
> out http://www.macaddict.com. Basically it's a build with the bsd
> port, with a few tweaks to the makefiles.

--
Scott Leibrand
[email protected] (Yes, that is a valid address.)
http://students.washington.edu/leibrand
* Opinions expressed are mine. Everyone else can get their own. :) *
* RCW 19.190 notice: This email address is located in Washington State. *
* Unsolicited commercial email may be billed $500 per message. *

From [email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Mon, 23 Oct 2000 18:58:27 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id SAA12127;
Mon, 23 Oct 2000 18:58:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from list1.u.washington.edu ([email protected] [140.142.8.99])
by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id SAA26930;
Mon, 23 Oct 2000 18:58:25 -0700
Received: from host ([email protected] [140.142.56.13])
by list1.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id SAA38576;
Mon, 23 Oct 2000 18:56:54 -0700
Received: from mxu4.u.washington.edu (mxu4.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.8])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id SAA194072
for <[email protected]>; Mon, 23 Oct 2000 18:55:38 -0700
Received: from vax.area.com (vax.area.com [216.218.218.27])
by mxu4.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id SAA03479
for <[email protected]>; Mon, 23 Oct 2000 18:55:38 -0700
Received: (qmail 7288 invoked by uid 1828); 24 Oct 2000 01:55:37 -0000
Message-Id: <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2000 18:55:36 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: [email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
From: Matt Ackeret <[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
Subject: pine on Mac OS X.
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN

forwarded for a nonsubscriber.

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Soren Spies <[email protected]>
Matt, this might not make it to the [email protected] since I'm not on the list (ie. might get rejected) ... forward it for me if you don't see it or you know that non-members aren't allowed to post it to the list.

I actually figured out how to get it to build all at once. :)

On Monday, October 23, 2000, at 05:32 PM, Matt Ackeret wrote:

> Date: Sun, 22 Oct 2000 23:34:00 -0500
> From: "Raghuram Kalletla" <[email protected]>
> To: <[email protected]>
> Subject: problems compiling PINE in Macintosh OS X
> Message-ID: <001c01c03caa$77e24bc0$8338aec7@computer>
>
> Hey all,
> I've been trying to install PINE on Macintosh OS X (Public =
> Beta) from the command prompt without success. Does anybody on the list =
> have experience in compiling PINE on Darwin? I could not find an =
> appropriate port for OS X so I've used "nxt", "mct" while using the =
> "./build" command and here's what I got in the end:=20

I remember getting stuff like that ... it was a bummer

> The other ports I tried were: aux, bsd, bsf, gen, and mac. When I used =
> these, I got this message at the end of the compilation:

I also tried bsd and bsf ... bsf nearly did the trick (see below)

> Any help to find the appropriate port and/or tips will be appreciated.

This is the story of how I got pine 4.21 to compile. It is initially ugly and but does result in a nice packaged solution if someone who can make these changes will do them to the next release of pine.

log-based directions (see below before you do this):
0) cd pine; cp makefile.bsf makefile.dar;
1) cd ../pico; cp makefile.bsf makefile.dar
2) comment out -ltermcap from line 47 of makefile.dar
3) cd ../pine; comment out -ltermlib from line 64 of makefile.dar
4) cd ..; build dar [get pico and pilot]
5) delete only line "-lcrypt" in c-client/LDFLAGS
6) build dar [get pine]
7) cd imapd; make
8) cd ..; build dar [get imapd]
9) cd imap; make
10) cd ..; build dar [get mtest]

[these do work ...]
yuck ... hey, wait a second

real directions:
1) cd pine; cp makefile.bsf makefile.dar;
2) cd ../pico; cp makefile.bsf makefile.dar
3) delete -ltermcap from line 47 of makefile.dar
4) cd ../pine; delete -ltermlib from line 64 of makefile.dar
5) cd ../imap; add "dar" to target line containing bsf in Makefile
6) cd src/osdep/unix; around line 192 of Makefile, create a new section
called "dar" that is the same as bsf and looks a bit like this (remember
I have pine 4.21: change name and drop the -lcrypt and preceeding \):

dar: # Darwin (aka Mac OS X)
$(BUILD) `cat EXTRASPECIALS` OS=bsi SIGTYPE=psx \
SPOOLDIR=/var \
ACTIVEFILE=/usr/local/news/lib/active \
RSHPATH=/usr/bin/rsh \
BASECFLAGS="-g -O -pipe -DNFSKLUDGE"
7) cd ../../../..; build dar

I get (woohoo after much labor!):
Links to executables are in bin directory:
__TEXT __DATA __OBJC others dec hex
3194880 233472 0 712704 4141056 3f3000 bin/pine
589824 12288 0 634880 1236992 12e000 bin/mtest
634880 20480 0 688128 1343488 148000 bin/imapd
270336 12288 0 24576 307200 4b000 bin/pico
266240 12288 0 24576 303104 4a000 bin/pilot
Done

Let me know if you have any trouble,
Soren

P.S. gotta wonder what the "*** TEMPORARY for PINE 4.10 BUILD" messages were doing in my pine 4.21 distribution.

--
Soren Spies
Apple Computer, Inc.

--
-----------------------------------------------------------------
For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see:
http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/
-----------------------------------------------------------------

From [email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Tue, 24 Oct 2000 03:07:21 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.1])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id DAA25628;
Tue, 24 Oct 2000 03:07:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from list4.u.washington.edu ([email protected] [140.142.14.167])
by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id DAA22617;
Tue, 24 Oct 2000 03:07:19 -0700
Received: from host ([email protected] [140.142.56.13])
by list4.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id DAA22066;
Tue, 24 Oct 2000 03:06:21 -0700
Received: from mxu4.u.washington.edu (mxu4.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.8])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id DAA48104
for <[email protected]>; Tue, 24 Oct 2000 03:04:22 -0700
Received: from zeus.compulink.gr (zeus.compulink.gr [195.242.129.14])
by mxu4.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id DAA19768
for <[email protected]>; Tue, 24 Oct 2000 03:04:21 -0700
Received: from localhost (pantonop@localhost)
by zeus.compulink.gr (8.10.2/8.10.2) with ESMTP id e9OA4J926824
for <[email protected]>; Tue, 24 Oct 2000 13:04:19 +0300
Message-Id: <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2000 13:04:19 +0300 (EEST)
Sender: [email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
From: Antonopoulos Panagiotis <[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
Subject: address book and distribution list
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN

Dear list members,
I have the following problem, and wonder if there is an easy and safe way
to tackle it. I have, it seems for long, during conversions and additions
to my address book, started taking certain address as "distribution list",
instead of a single entry. If I try to delete that list, even at the risk
of losing these addresses, then the remaining addresses, correctly stored,
appear in reverse order, so, I really do not know where to stop. I would
like to have all those addresses labelled as distribution lists, shown
correctly as single addresses in my address book. If there is a not too
complicated way of doing this, I would be most grateful to hear from
you. I have pine v4.20 and 4.21 in my two accounts, which I interact,
hence the problem may have arrisen.
With Kindest Regards,
Panagiotis

--
-----------------------------------------------------------------
For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see:
http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/
-----------------------------------------------------------------

From [email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Tue, 24 Oct 2000 11:45:54 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id LAA11926;
Tue, 24 Oct 2000 11:45:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from list4.u.washington.edu ([email protected] [140.142.14.167])
by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id LAA16560;
Tue, 24 Oct 2000 11:45:49 -0700
Received: from host ([email protected] [140.142.56.13])
by list4.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id LAA22602;
Tue, 24 Oct 2000 11:43:42 -0700
Received: from mxu3.u.washington.edu (mxu3.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.7])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id LAA154996
for <[email protected]>; Tue, 24 Oct 2000 11:41:36 -0700
Received: from gull.prod.itd.earthlink.net (gull.prod.itd.earthlink.net [207.217.121.85])
by mxu3.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id LAA16187
for <[email protected]>; Tue, 24 Oct 2000 11:41:35 -0700
Received: from xAplos (sdn-ar-002flflauP331.dialsprint.net [168.191.74.237])
by gull.prod.itd.earthlink.net (EL-8_9_3_3/8.9.3) with SMTP id LAA27537
for <[email protected]>; Tue, 24 Oct 2000 11:41:28 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2000 14:41:25 -0400
Reply-To: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
From: Mark F Rodriguez <[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
Subject: Building Pine 4.21 on Mac OSX
Content-Type: text/enriched;
charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v337)
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN

<=
flushleft><fontfamily><param>Helvetica</param><x-tabstops><param>28L;56L;8=
4L;112L;140L;168L;196L;224L;252L;280L;308L;336L;</param>I've just =
downloaded Pine from =
<underline><color><param>1A1A,1A1A,FFFF</param>http://www.macaddict.com/os=
x/geeks.html</color></underline> and was able to build pico, pilot, =
mtest and imapd just fine. However, when making pine I got the following =
error (btw, I used ./build osx):

cc -g -DDEBUG -DBSDDEF -DSYSTYPE=3D\"BSD\" -c -o send.o send.c

send.c:6696: illegal function call: encountered end of stream

make: *** [send.o] Error 1

=20

I guess I'm wondering has anyone been able to build Pine on Apple's new =
OS X public beta and if so can I use the Pine files from =
<underline><color><param>1A1A,1A1A,FFFF</param>http://www.washington.edu/p=
ine/</color></underline> to do it?

I understand that some changes have to be made to =
/{pico,pine}/makefile.xxx, ./{pico,pine}/osdep/os-xxx.h, and possibly =
/{pico,pine}/osdep/os-xxx.ic but it looks like someone has already done =
this work. Unfortunately, the link to =
<underline><color><param>1A1A,1A1A,FFFF</param>ftp://next-ftp.peak.org/pub=
/rhapsody/Applications/Unix/Mail/</color></underline> doesn't seem to =
have any files available.

If anyone can help me in getting pine to run on Mac OSX, I'd be greatly =
appreciative. I'm tired of using the built in Mail program:-(

Thanks in advance,

-Mark</x-tabstops></fontfamily></flushleft>=
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------
For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see:
http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/
-----------------------------------------------------------------

From [email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Tue, 24 Oct 2000 12:13:50 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id MAA30964;
Tue, 24 Oct 2000 12:13:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from list1.u.washington.edu ([email protected] [140.142.8.99])
by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id MAA17454;
Tue, 24 Oct 2000 12:13:48 -0700
Received: from host ([email protected] [140.142.56.13])
by list1.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id MAA53730;
Tue, 24 Oct 2000 12:12:26 -0700
Received: from mxu1.u.washington.edu (mxu1.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.8])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id MAA202518
for <[email protected]>; Tue, 24 Oct 2000 12:06:27 -0700
Received: from mm02snlnto.sandia.gov (mm02snlnto.sandia.gov [132.175.109.21])
by mxu1.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id MAA12913
for <[email protected]>; Tue, 24 Oct 2000 12:06:26 -0700
Received: from 132.175.109.1 by mm02snlnto.sandia.gov with ESMTP (
WorldSecure Server SMTP Relay(WSS) v4.5); Tue, 24 Oct 2000 13:06:19
-0600
Received: from es08snlnt.sandia.gov (es08snlnt.sandia.gov
[134.253.130.11]) by sass165.sandia.gov (8.10.2/8.10.2) with ESMTP id
e9OJ6JD18079 for <[email protected]>; Tue, 24 Oct 2000 13:06:
19 -0600 (MDT)
Received: from sasg829.sandia.gov ([134.253.45.38]) by
es08snlnt.sandia.gov with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail
Service Version 5.5.2650.21) id 4TM67MDL; Tue, 24 Oct 2000 13:06:17
-0600
Message-Id: <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2000 13:06:19 -0600
Sender: [email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
From: "Daniel Sands" <[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Sort order INBOX/folder
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-To: "Pine Discussion Forum" <[email protected]>
X-Server-Uuid: 7edb479a-fd89-11d2-9a77-0090273cd58c
X-WSS-ID: 15EB02211965581-01-01
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN

So use a different spell checker, or offer a source version without it. Or is
it too much integrated into the program?

> > Why is it the source for PC-PINE isn't available?
>
> There's a copyright issue with the bundled spellchecker, tha tonly
> allows for binary distribution.
>
> --
> Gopi Sundaram
> [email protected]
> http://www.cse.sc.edu/~gopalan/Pine/
>

From [email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Tue, 24 Oct 2000 16:45:30 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.1])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id QAA32116;
Tue, 24 Oct 2000 16:45:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from list3.u.washington.edu ([email protected] [140.142.8.100])
by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id QAA13169;
Tue, 24 Oct 2000 16:45:28 -0700
Received: from host ([email protected] [140.142.56.13])
by list3.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id QAA42630;
Tue, 24 Oct 2000 16:44:13 -0700
Received: from mxu4.u.washington.edu (mxu4.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.8])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id QAA73172
for <[email protected]>; Tue, 24 Oct 2000 16:42:43 -0700
Received: from vax.area.com (vax.area.com [216.218.218.27])
by mxu4.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id QAA02086
for <[email protected]>; Tue, 24 Oct 2000 16:42:43 -0700
Received: (qmail 26064 invoked by uid 1828); 24 Oct 2000 23:42:42 -0000
Message-Id: <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2000 16:42:42 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: [email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
From: Matt Ackeret <[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
Subject: Updating 'new message' count dynamically
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN

I've mentioned this before in passing in discussions of other problems/
suggestions, but here it is again on its own as an enhancement request..
(Well, I actually consider it a bug, but maybe others don't.)

The problem:
pine doesn't update its list of 'new' messages upon expunging or change of
status from another email program. And yes, I do frequently use two email
programs (IMAP of course) on the same mailbox.

The fix:
1) The "most noticable" fix, I would say, would be to
count_new_messages() [I sure HOPE there's something at that granularity]
after pine has noticed that messages have been expunged..
(it prints the message at the bottom -- it must know somehow!)

2) also count_new_messages() when it notices status of messages
have changed (i.e. some went from new to non-new).

Hopefully someone can whip this out.

--
-----------------------------------------------------------------
For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see:
http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/
-----------------------------------------------------------------

From [email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Tue, 24 Oct 2000 22:08:56 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.1])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id WAA03605;
Tue, 24 Oct 2000 22:08:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from list1.u.washington.edu ([email protected] [140.142.8.99])
by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id WAA19899;
Tue, 24 Oct 2000 22:08:54 -0700
Received: from host ([email protected] [140.142.56.13])
by list1.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id WAA40012;
Tue, 24 Oct 2000 22:06:44 -0700
Received: from mxu1.u.washington.edu (mxu1.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.8])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id WAA70288
for <[email protected]>; Tue, 24 Oct 2000 22:04:26 -0700
Received: from blount.mail.mindspring.net (blount.mail.mindspring.net [207.69.200.226])
by mxu1.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id WAA26751
for <[email protected]>; Tue, 24 Oct 2000 22:04:25 -0700
Received: from computer (user-33qsdr6.dialup.mindspring.com [199.174.55.102])
by blount.mail.mindspring.net (8.9.3/8.8.5) with SMTP id BAA19310;
Wed, 25 Oct 2000 01:04:16 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <001501c03e41$00bf3060$6637aec7@computer>
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2000 00:04:05 -0500
Sender: [email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
From: "Raghuram Kalletla" <[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Building Pine 4.21 on Mac OSX
References: <[email protected]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0012_01C03E17.16BB08A0"
X-To: <[email protected]>,
"Pine Discussion Forum" <[email protected]>
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2615.200
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

------=_NextPart_000_0012_01C03E17.16BB08A0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

I'll answer that, since I've spent the past 72 hours trying to compile =
Pine on Darwin without any success and finally got it installed from the =
MacAddict site.=20

Mark, what you've downloaded from MacAddict's website is a binary. So =
you don't have to worry about compiling it again! You're probably =
getting those errors because you've used the "osx" port. There is no =
such port (as yet) in Pine. The files on MacAddict's website have been =
modified to make it compatible with Darwin. Try ./build bsd and it =
should compile fine...(NOTE: If you download pine.tar.gz from U =
Washington's website and compile it for bsd, you will have problems. The =
files on MacAddict's website have been modified for Darwin)...although =
you don't have to since it's already been done for you...but if you're =
just curious like me, go right ahead.=20

Even though I've got that out of the way, I'm still having problems =
configuring Pine to use "sendmail". So if you or anybody on the list =
could help me out with that, I'd be greatful. I have OS X installed on =
an iMac that's configured to obtain an IP address from a DHCP server.=20

I have the following value set in "smtp-server" in Pine's configuration:
/usr/sbin/sendmail (that's where =
sendmail is)

and this value set in "user-domain":
mac-test-machine.uta.edu ("mac-test-machine" is the name =
of the computer)

When I try to send a message, I get this error: [Error sending: Invalid =
host specifier: /usr/sbin/sendmail]

Any of you out there know what the problem could be?

Raghuram
----- Original Message -----=20
From: Mark F Rodriguez=20
To: Pine Discussion Forum=20
Sent: Tuesday, October 24, 2000 1:41 PM
Subject: Building Pine 4.21 on Mac OSX

I've just downloaded Pine from http://www.macaddict.com/osx/geeks.html =
and was able to build pico, pilot, mtest and imapd just fine. However, =
when making pine I got the following error (btw, I used ./build osx):

cc -g -DDEBUG -DBSDDEF -DSYSTYPE=3D\"BSD\" -c -o send.o send.c
send.c:6696: illegal function call: encountered end of stream
make: *** [send.o] Error 1

I guess I'm wondering has anyone been able to build Pine on Apple's =
new OS X public beta and if so can I use the Pine files from =
http://www.washington.edu/pine/ to do it?

I understand that some changes have to be made to =
/{pico,pine}/makefile.xxx, ./{pico,pine}/osdep/os-xxx.h, and possibly =
/{pico,pine}/osdep/os-xxx.ic but it looks like someone has already done =
this work. Unfortunately, the link to =
ftp://next-ftp.peak.org/pub/rhapsody/Applications/Unix/Mail/ doesn't =
seem to have any files available.

If anyone can help me in getting pine to run on Mac OSX, I'd be =
greatly appreciative. I'm tired of using the built in Mail program:-(

Thanks in advance,
-Mark-- =
----------------------------------------------------------------- For =
information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: =
http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ =
-----------------------------------------------------------------

------=_NextPart_000_0012_01C03E17.16BB08A0
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<?flushleft><?fontfamily><?param Helvetica><?x-tabstops><?param =
28L;56L;84L;112L;140L;168L;196L;224L;252L;280L;308L;336L;><HTML><HEAD>
<META content=3D"text/html; charset=3Diso-8859-1" =
http-equiv=3DContent-Type>
<META content=3D"MSHTML 5.00.2614.3500" name=3DGENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>I'll answer that, since I've spent the =
past 72=20
hours trying to compile Pine on Darwin without any success and finally =
got it=20
installed from the MacAddict site. </FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Mark, what you've downloaded from =
MacAddict's=20
website is a binary. So you don't have to worry about compiling it =
again! You're=20
probably getting those errors because you've used the "osx" port. There =
is no=20
such port (as yet) in Pine. The files on MacAddict's website have been =
modified=20
to make it compatible with Darwin. Try ./build bsd and it should compile =

fine...(NOTE: If you download pine.tar.gz from U Washington's website =
and=20
compile it for bsd, you will have problems. The files on MacAddict's =
website=20
have been modified for Darwin)...although you don't have to since it's =
already=20
been done for you...but if you're just curious like me, go right ahead.=20
</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Even though I've got that out of the =
way, I'm still=20
having problems configuring Pine to use "sendmail". So if you or anybody =
on the=20
list could help me out with that, I'd be greatful. I have OS X installed =
on an=20
iMac that's configured to obtain an IP address from a DHCP server. =
</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>I have the following value set in =
"smtp-server" in=20
Pine's configuration:</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial=20
size=3D2>/usr/sbin/sendmail       &nbs=
p;           &nbsp=
;            =
       =20
(that's where sendmail is)</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>and this value set in =
"user-domain":</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>mac-test-machine.uta.edu</FONT><FONT =
face=3DArial=20
size=3D2>          &nbs=
p;     =20
("mac-test-machine" is the name of the computer)</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>When I try to send a message, I get =
this error:=20
[Error sending: Invalid host specifier: /usr/sbin/sendmail]</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Any of you out there know what the =
problem could=20
be?</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Raghuram</FONT></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE=20
style=3D"BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-RIGHT: =
0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; PADDING-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
<DIV=20
style=3D"BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: =
black"><B>From:</B>=20
<A href=3D"mailto:[email protected]" =
[email protected]>Mark F=20
Rodriguez</A> </DIV>
<DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A=20
href=3D"mailto:[email protected]" =
[email protected]>Pine=20
Discussion Forum</A> </DIV>
<DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Tuesday, October 24, 2000 =
1:41=20
PM</DIV>
<DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> Building Pine 4.21 on =
Mac=20
OSX</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>I've just downloaded Pine from <U><?color><?param =
1A1A,1A1A,FFFF><A=20
=
href=3D"http://www.macaddict.com/osx/geeks.html">http://www.macaddict.com=
/osx/geeks.html</A><?/color></U>=20
and was able to build pico, pilot, mtest and imapd just fine. However, =
when=20
making pine I got the following error (btw, I used ./build =
osx):<BR><BR>cc -g=20
-DDEBUG -DBSDDEF -DSYSTYPE=3D\"BSD\" -c -o send.o =
send.c<BR>send.c:6696: illegal=20
function call: encountered end of stream<BR>make: *** [send.o] Error=20
1<BR><BR>I guess I'm wondering has anyone been able to build Pine on =
Apple's=20
new OS X public beta and if so can I use the Pine files from =
<U><?color><?param =
1A1A,1A1A,FFFF>http://www.washington.edu/pine/<?/color></U>=20
to do it?<BR><BR>I understand that some changes have to be made to=20
./{pico,pine}/makefile.xxx, ./{pico,pine}/osdep/os-xxx.h, and possibly =

./{pico,pine}/osdep/os-xxx.ic but it looks like someone has already =
done this=20
work. Unfortunately, the link to=20
<U><?color><?param =
1A1A,1A1A,FFFF>ftp://next-ftp.peak.org/pub/rhapsody/Applications/Unix/Mai=
l/<?/color></U>=20
doesn't seem to have any files available.<BR><BR>If anyone can help me =
in=20
getting pine to run on Mac OSX, I'd be greatly appreciative. I'm tired =
of=20
using the built in Mail program:-(<BR><BR>Thanks in =
advance,<BR>-Mark<?/x-tabstops><?/fontfamily><?/flushleft>--=20
----------------------------------------------------------------- For=20
information about this mailing list, and its archives, see:=20
http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/=20
=
-----------------------------------------------------------------</BLOCKQ=
UOTE></BODY></HTML>

------=_NextPart_000_0012_01C03E17.16BB08A0--

From [email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Wed, 25 Oct 2000 05:21:58 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id FAA13571;
Wed, 25 Oct 2000 05:21:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from list2.u.washington.edu ([email protected] [140.142.14.165])
by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id FAA08929;
Wed, 25 Oct 2000 05:21:51 -0700
Received: from host ([email protected] [140.142.56.13])
by list2.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id FAA18816;
Wed, 25 Oct 2000 05:20:45 -0700
Received: from mxu1.u.washington.edu (mxu1.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.8])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id FAA172742
for <[email protected]>; Wed, 25 Oct 2000 05:19:03 -0700
Received: from ai2.accesinternet.com ([email protected] [195.101.235.2])
by mxu1.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id FAA29156
for <[email protected]>; Wed, 25 Oct 2000 05:19:01 -0700
Received: from ar95.dtr.fr (ar95.dtr.fr [212.67.49.95])
by ai2.accesinternet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id OAA24168
for <[email protected]>; Wed, 25 Oct 2000 14:18:53 +0200
Message-Id: <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2000 14:19:57 +0100 (Paris, Madrid)
Sender: [email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Gu=E9ny?= <[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
Subject: authentification
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE
X-Sender: [email protected]
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN

My new ISP requires Authentification function to get into the SMTP
server. This function exists on OE and Netscape Messenger.

Does PC Pine 4.21 for win 95 have this capability ?

If so, how do I activate it ?

Thanks in advance
--
Patrick Gu=E9ny
Nevers France

--
-----------------------------------------------------------------
For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see:
http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/
-----------------------------------------------------------------

From [email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Wed, 25 Oct 2000 06:20:46 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id GAA01940;
Wed, 25 Oct 2000 06:20:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from list1.u.washington.edu ([email protected] [140.142.8.99])
by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id GAA10027;
Wed, 25 Oct 2000 06:20:43 -0700
Received: from host ([email protected] [140.142.56.13])
by list1.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id GAA40418;
Wed, 25 Oct 2000 06:19:36 -0700
Received: from mxu4.u.washington.edu (mxu4.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.8])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id GAA185674
for <[email protected]>; Wed, 25 Oct 2000 06:18:49 -0700
Received: from mail.sonytel.be (mail.sonytel.be [193.74.243.200])
by mxu4.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id GAA19742
for <[email protected]>; Wed, 25 Oct 2000 06:18:48 -0700
Received: from cactus.sonytel.be (cactus.sonytel.be [193.74.243.97])
by mail.sonytel.be (8.9.0/8.8.6) with ESMTP id PAA10330
for <[email protected]>; Wed, 25 Oct 2000 15:18:46 +0200 (MET DST)
Message-Id: <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2000 15:18:43 +0200 (MET DST)
Sender: [email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
From: Piotr Martyniuk <[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
Subject: PINE and INTERNAL DATA file
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-To: NEWS - Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
X-Sender: [email protected]
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN

Hi!

Is possible to turn off feature which store messages like this:

From MAILER-DAEMON Wed Oct 25 15:04:44 2000
Date: 25 Oct 2000 15:04:44 +0200
From: Mail System Internal Data <[email protected]>
Subject: DON'T DELETE THIS MESSAGE -- FOLDER INTERNAL DATA
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
X-IMAP: 0969867225 0000000322
Status: RO

This text is part of the internal format of your mail folder, and is not
a real message. It is created automatically by the mail system software.
If deleted, important folder data will be lost, and it will be re-created
with the data reset to initial values.

in folder $MAIL?

Regards

Piotr

--
-----------------------------------------------------------------
For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see:
http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/
-----------------------------------------------------------------

From [email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Wed, 25 Oct 2000 06:31:40 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id GAA26839;
Wed, 25 Oct 2000 06:31:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from list3.u.washington.edu ([email protected] [140.142.8.100])
by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id GAA10204;
Wed, 25 Oct 2000 06:31:38 -0700
Received: from host ([email protected] [140.142.56.13])
by list3.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id GAA25618;
Wed, 25 Oct 2000 06:30:31 -0700
Received: from mxu2.u.washington.edu (mxu2.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.9])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id GAA189396
for <[email protected]>; Wed, 25 Oct 2000 06:29:36 -0700
Received: from mail.sonytel.be (mail.sonytel.be [193.74.243.200])
by mxu2.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id GAA31986
for <[email protected]>; Wed, 25 Oct 2000 06:29:33 -0700
Received: from cactus.sonytel.be (cactus.sonytel.be [193.74.243.97])
by mail.sonytel.be (8.9.0/8.8.6) with ESMTP id PAA10761
for <[email protected]>; Wed, 25 Oct 2000 15:29:29 +0200 (MET DST)
Message-Id: <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2000 15:29:29 +0200 (MET DST)
Sender: [email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
From: Piotr Martyniuk <[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
Subject: PINE strange behaviour
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-To: NEWS - Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
X-Sender: [email protected]
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN

Hi!

I have problem with pine, because they have srange behaviour there. Normally
they should skip between new arrived mails if TAB key is pressed and if they
reach last message - they should skip to anoter pine catalogue where is next
new message. This work on linux machine without any special configuration,
just after standard instalation, but this freature don't work on Sun
machines and I don't know what is wrong, because I try this with any
configuration (also with default generated .pinerc file) and pine still do
this same - if reach last mail in pine directory they won't go to another.

This behaviour is very tired for me, because I have quite a few directores
where I filter my message according to message type (topic, subject, from,
... etc) and is very hard to find where is stored new arrived message (I
must get in in each pine directory if I want find new message).

Anybody help me resolve this problem? Please!

Regards

Piotr

--
-----------------------------------------------------------------
For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see:
http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/
-----------------------------------------------------------------

From [email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Wed, 25 Oct 2000 06:39:57 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.1])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id GAA17462;
Wed, 25 Oct 2000 06:39:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from list3.u.washington.edu ([email protected] [140.142.8.100])
by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id GAA30091;
Wed, 25 Oct 2000 06:39:54 -0700
Received: from host ([email protected] [140.142.56.13])
by list3.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id GAA21284;
Wed, 25 Oct 2000 06:39:25 -0700
Received: from mxu2.u.washington.edu (mxu2.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.9])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id GAA194286
for <[email protected]>; Wed, 25 Oct 2000 06:38:43 -0700
Received: from legolas.mdh.se ([email protected] [130.243.77.20])
by mxu2.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id GAA00390
for <[email protected]>; Wed, 25 Oct 2000 06:38:42 -0700
Received: by legolas.mdh.se (8.9.3/8.9.3) id PAA28666;
Wed, 25 Oct 2000 15:38:38 +0200 (MET DST)
Message-Id: <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2000 15:38:37 +0200 (MET DST)
Sender: [email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
From: Emil Isberg <[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
Subject: smtp-server (was: Re: Building Pine 4.21 on Mac OSX)
In-Reply-To: <001501c03e41$00bf3060$6637aec7@computer>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-Sender: [email protected]
X-To: Raghuram Kalletla <[email protected]>
X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN

On Wed, 25 Oct 2000, Raghuram Kalletla wrote:
>Even though I've got that out of the way, I'm still having problems
>configuring Pine to use "sendmail". So if you or anybody on the list
>could help me out with that, I'd be greatful. I have OS X installed on
>an iMac that's configured to obtain an IP address from a DHCP server.
>
>I have the following value set in "smtp-server" in Pine's configuration:
>/usr/sbin/sendmail (that's where sendmail is)

smtp-server is the server pine connects to to send mail...
For me that is blank since I use sendmail directly but if one don't have
sendmail (or compatible) then that option comes in handy.

>and this value set in "user-domain": mac-test-machine.uta.edu
>("mac-test-machine" is the name of the computer)

user-domain sets the FROM domainpart... normally pine get it from the
hostname but it could be wrong and then that option is the one to use.

For me I set it to: mds.mdh.se
as that is my maildomain...

>When I try to send a message, I get this error: [Error sending: Invalid
>host specifier: /usr/sbin/sendmail]

Ofcourse... pine tried to resolv /usr/sbin/sendmail as a host...

You will have to leave smtp-server blank and set sendmail-path instead.

As in sendmail-path: /usr/sbin/sendmail

--
"A programmer is a person who passes as an exacting expert on the basis
of being able to turn out, after innumerable punching, an infinite
series of incomprehensive answers calculated with micrometric
precisions from vague assumptions based on debatable figures taken from
inconclusive documents and carried out on instruments of problematical
accuracy by persons of dubious reliability and questionable mentality
for the avowed purpose of annoying and confounding a hopelessly
defenseless department that was unfortunate enough to ask for the
information in the first place."
-- IEEE Grid news magazine

From [email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Wed, 25 Oct 2000 07:13:56 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id HAA28886;
Wed, 25 Oct 2000 07:13:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from list4.u.washington.edu ([email protected] [140.142.14.167])
by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id HAA10978;
Wed, 25 Oct 2000 07:13:55 -0700
Received: from host ([email protected] [140.142.56.13])
by list4.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id HAA16718;
Wed, 25 Oct 2000 07:12:52 -0700
Received: from mxu1.u.washington.edu (mxu1.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.8])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id HAA189344
for <[email protected]>; Wed, 25 Oct 2000 07:12:07 -0700
Received: from usceast.cs.sc.edu (usceast.cs.sc.edu [129.252.11.9])
by mxu1.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id HAA07569
for <[email protected]>; Wed, 25 Oct 2000 07:12:06 -0700
Received: from pearl.cs.sc.edu (pearl.cs.sc.edu [129.252.130.40])
by usceast.cs.sc.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA30982
for <[email protected]>; Wed, 25 Oct 2000 10:12:05 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2000 10:12:05 -0400 (EDT)
Sender: [email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
From: Gopi Sundaram <[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: PINE and INTERNAL DATA file
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
X-Sender: [email protected]
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN

On Wed, 25 Oct 2000, Piotr Martyniuk wrote:

> Is possible to turn off feature which store messages like this:

FAQ.

Yes. (M)ain (S)etup (C)onfigure and uncheck the following option:

[ ] quell-folder-internal-msg

Read the help on it to understand what features will be affected by
it.

Gopi.

--
Gopi Sundaram
[email protected]
http://www.cse.sc.edu/~gopalan/Pine/

From [email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Wed, 25 Oct 2000 07:15:37 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.1])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id HAA05933;
Wed, 25 Oct 2000 07:15:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from list3.u.washington.edu ([email protected] [140.142.8.100])
by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id HAA30867;
Wed, 25 Oct 2000 07:15:32 -0700
Received: from host ([email protected] [140.142.56.13])
by list3.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id HAA19202;
Wed, 25 Oct 2000 07:14:32 -0700
Received: from mxu1.u.washington.edu (mxu1.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.8])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id HAA194302
for <[email protected]>; Wed, 25 Oct 2000 07:13:41 -0700
Received: from usceast.cs.sc.edu (usceast.cs.sc.edu [129.252.11.9])
by mxu1.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id HAA07771
for <[email protected]>; Wed, 25 Oct 2000 07:13:41 -0700
Received: from pearl.cs.sc.edu (pearl.cs.sc.edu [129.252.130.40])
by usceast.cs.sc.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA31007
for <[email protected]>; Wed, 25 Oct 2000 10:13:40 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2000 10:13:40 -0400 (EDT)
Sender: [email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
From: Gopi Sundaram <[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: authentification
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE
X-To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
X-Sender: [email protected]
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN

On Wed, 25 Oct 2000, Gu=E9ny wrote:

> My new ISP requires Authentification function to get into the SMTP
> server. This function exists on OE and Netscape Messenger.
>=20
> Does PC Pine 4.21 for win 95 have this capability ?

I think so. Try setting the /user=3D flag on your smtp server definition
in (M)ain (S)etup (C)onfig

smtp-server =3D my.mailserver.example/user=3Dxyzzy

See if that works.

Gopi.

--=20
Gopi Sundaram
[email protected]
http://www.cse.sc.edu/~gopalan/Pine/

From [email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Wed, 25 Oct 2000 10:06:52 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.1])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id KAA32336;
Wed, 25 Oct 2000 10:06:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from list1.u.washington.edu ([email protected] [140.142.8.99])
by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id KAA03641;
Wed, 25 Oct 2000 10:06:51 -0700
Received: from host ([email protected] [140.142.56.13])
by list1.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id KAA21988;
Wed, 25 Oct 2000 10:05:06 -0700
Received: from bp15.u.washington.edu ([email protected] [140.142.15.205])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id KAA59130
for <[email protected]>; Wed, 25 Oct 2000 10:04:04 -0700
Received: from localhost (leibrand@localhost)
by bp15.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id KAA103008;
Wed, 25 Oct 2000 10:03:54 -0700
Message-Id: <Pine.A41.4.29.99999.0010251003080.176756-100000@bp15.u.washington.edu>
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2000 10:03:53 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: [email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
From: Scott Leibrand <[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: PINE strange behaviour
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-To: Piotr Martyniuk <[email protected]>
X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
X-Sender: <[email protected]>
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN

Sounds like you need to enable-incoming-folders in Main, Setup, Config,
and then add the folders you want to check for new mail to your Incoming
Folders collection. Give that a try and get back to us if you have
trouble.

--
Scott Leibrand
[email protected] (Yes, that is a valid address.)
http://students.washington.edu/leibrand
* Opinions expressed are mine. Everyone else can get their own. :) *
* RCW 19.190 notice: This email address is located in Washington State. *
* Unsolicited commercial email may be billed $500 per message. *

On Wed, 25 Oct 2000, Piotr Martyniuk wrote:

> Hi!
>
> I have problem with pine, because they have srange behaviour there. Normally
> they should skip between new arrived mails if TAB key is pressed and if they
> reach last message - they should skip to anoter pine catalogue where is next
> new message. This work on linux machine without any special configuration,
> just after standard instalation, but this freature don't work on Sun
> machines and I don't know what is wrong, because I try this with any
> configuration (also with default generated .pinerc file) and pine still do
> this same - if reach last mail in pine directory they won't go to another.
>
> This behaviour is very tired for me, because I have quite a few directores
> where I filter my message according to message type (topic, subject, from,
> ... etc) and is very hard to find where is stored new arrived message (I
> must get in in each pine directory if I want find new message).
>
> Anybody help me resolve this problem? Please!
>
> Regards
>
> Piotr
>
>
> --
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see:
> http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
>

From [email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 26 Oct 2000 02:38:45 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id CAA14077;
Thu, 26 Oct 2000 02:38:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from list1.u.washington.edu ([email protected] [140.142.8.99])
by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id CAA08809;
Thu, 26 Oct 2000 02:38:43 -0700
Received: from host ([email protected] [140.142.56.13])
by list1.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id CAA53710;
Thu, 26 Oct 2000 02:37:53 -0700
Received: from mxu4.u.washington.edu (mxu4.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.8])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id CAA143794
for <[email protected]>; Thu, 26 Oct 2000 02:36:21 -0700
Received: from mail.sonytel.be (mail.sonytel.be [193.74.243.200])
by mxu4.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id CAA25488
for <[email protected]>; Thu, 26 Oct 2000 02:36:14 -0700
Received: from cactus.sonytel.be (cactus.sonytel.be [193.74.243.97])
by mail.sonytel.be (8.9.0/8.8.6) with ESMTP id LAA12939
for <[email protected]>; Thu, 26 Oct 2000 11:35:49 +0200 (MET DST)
Message-Id: <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2000 11:35:48 +0200 (MET DST)
Sender: [email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
From: Piotr Martyniuk <[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
Subject: Default mail folder location
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-To: NEWS - Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
X-Sender: [email protected]
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN

Hi!

I have problem with change default mail folder location in PINE. I try change
this using other pine.config file like this:

pine -p pinerc_sony -P pine.conf

but this not work. If I check debbug message I got:

Debug output of the Pine program (debug=2 debug_imap=0). Version 4.21
Thu Oct 26 11:27:45 2000

reading_pinerc "/home/piotr/.pinecfg/pine.conf"
Read 14787 characters:
reading_pinerc "/home/piotr/.pinecfg/pinerc_sony"
Read 19217 characters:
read_pinerc: pinerc_written = 972550757
reading_pinerc "/usr/local/lib/pine.conf.fixed"
Open failed: No such file or directory
======= Current_val options set =======
user-domain : sonycom.com
smtp-server : mail.sonytel.be
nntp-server : news.sonytel.be
inbox-path : /net/primus/mail/spool/piotr
folder-collections : mail/[]
default-fcc : SENT/SENT
default-saved-msg-fo : SAVED/SAVED
postponed-folder : POSTPONES
mail-directory : mail
^^^^

In "pine.conf" file I set value "mail-directory" like this:

# Pine compares this value with the first folder collection directory.
# If they match (or no folder collections are defined), and the directory
# does not exist, Pine will create and use it. Default: ~/mail
mail-directory=/home/piotr/SONY

As You see from debbug output PINE don't set this catalog for new mail folder
location.

How to change default folder location?

Regards

Piotr

--
-----------------------------------------------------------------
For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see:
http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/
-----------------------------------------------------------------

From [email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 26 Oct 2000 10:12:23 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.1])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id KAA00207;
Thu, 26 Oct 2000 10:12:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from list1.u.washington.edu ([email protected] [140.142.8.99])
by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id KAA08440;
Thu, 26 Oct 2000 10:12:21 -0700
Received: from host ([email protected] [140.142.56.13])
by list1.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id KAA29970;
Thu, 26 Oct 2000 10:10:48 -0700
Received: from mxu4.u.washington.edu (mxu4.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.8])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id KAA212838
for <[email protected]>; Thu, 26 Oct 2000 10:09:04 -0700
Received: from rwja.umdnj.edu (rwja.UMDNJ.EDU [130.219.4.100])
by mxu4.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id KAA16664
for <[email protected]>; Thu, 26 Oct 2000 10:09:04 -0700
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by rwja.umdnj.edu (8.9.3 (PHNE_18546)/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA18371
for <[email protected]>; Thu, 26 Oct 2000 13:09:03 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2000 13:09:02 -0400 (EDT)
Sender: [email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
From: Robert Gessner <[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
Subject: PC Pine - Retain login name/password information for session
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN

I am installing PC Pine in a library public lab environment. I have
looked through quite a few websites, archives, etc. and I believe that I
have answered my own question, but I'd like to post to this list to be
certain.

I've installed PC Pine with the values for the first two lines of pinerc
set as:

personal-name=""
user-id=""

Upon Pine startup, users are prompted for a login name and password. Login
and access to their INBOX successfully follows. The first time composing
a message, the user is prompted for a Personal Name, in addition to a
login name [defaults to previous entry], password, and User ID for From
Address [defaults to login name]. My question is, since the user has
already entered the login name and password when Pine was started, is
there a way to automatically enter and accept these values (login name,
password, User ID for From Address) for composing messages, rather than
the user having to confirm or re-enter them the first time a message is
composed?

Thanks, Robert Gessner

--
-----------------------------------------------------------------
For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see:
http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/
-----------------------------------------------------------------

From [email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 26 Oct 2000 16:38:20 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id QAA21348;
Thu, 26 Oct 2000 16:38:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from list2.u.washington.edu ([email protected] [140.142.14.165])
by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id QAA32227;
Thu, 26 Oct 2000 16:38:18 -0700
Received: from host ([email protected] [140.142.56.13])
by list2.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id QAA14696;
Thu, 26 Oct 2000 16:36:56 -0700
Received: from mxu1.u.washington.edu (mxu1.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.8])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id QAA205416
for <[email protected]>; Thu, 26 Oct 2000 16:35:48 -0700
Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.1])
by mxu1.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id QAA27963
for <[email protected]>; Thu, 26 Oct 2000 16:35:48 -0700
Received: from list1.u.washington.edu ([email protected] [140.142.8.99])
by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id QAA20556;
Thu, 26 Oct 2000 16:35:47 -0700
Received: from host ([email protected] [140.142.56.13])
by list1.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id QAA33500;
Thu, 26 Oct 2000 16:35:18 -0700
Received: from mxu3.u.washington.edu (mxu3.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.7])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id QAA159626
for <[email protected]>; Thu, 26 Oct 2000 16:10:17 -0700
Received: from mxout1.cac.washington.edu (mxout1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.5])
by mxu3.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id QAA06443
for <[email protected]>; Thu, 26 Oct 2000 16:10:17 -0700
Received: from shiva2.cac.washington.edu (shiva2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.100.202])
by mxout1.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id QAA25504
for <[email protected]>; Thu, 26 Oct 2000 16:10:17 -0700
Received: from localhost (hubert@localhost)
by shiva2.cac.washington.edu (8.10.1+UW00.04/8.10.1+UW00.04) with ESMTP id e9QNAGo28695
for <[email protected]>; Thu, 26 Oct 2000 16:10:17 -0700
Message-Id: <Pine.GUL.4.30.0010261609310.22045-100000@shiva2.cac.washington.edu>
Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2000 16:10:15 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: [email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
From: Steve Hubert <[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
Subject: Pine 4.30 now available
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-Sender: [email protected]
X-To: Pine Announcement List <[email protected]>
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN

This note is to announce the availability of the Pine Message System
version 4.30. This latest release introduces some new features and fixes
a number of bugs found in earlier releases.

More specific information can be found in the built-in release notes ("R"
off the Main Menu), and via:

http://www.cac.washington.edu/pine/
and
ftp://ftp.cac.washington.edu/pine/docs/

Source for the latest Pine release is available in:

ftp://ftp.cac.washington.edu/pine/pine.tar.Z
and
ftp://ftp.cac.washington.edu/pine/pine.tar.gz

and precompiled binaries for the various systems we have direct access to
are available in:

ftp://ftp.cac.washington.edu/pine/unix-bin
and
ftp://ftp.cac.washington.edu/pine/unix-bin-compressed

The corresponding PC-Pine distribution is available in:

ftp://ftp.cac.washington.edu/pine/pcpine/pm430w32.zip

As with all Pine releases, it is important that you carefully test and
determine for yourself that it performs suitably in your environment
before placing Pine into production use.

The Pine Development Team

--
-------------------------------------------------------------
For information about this mailing list, see:
http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/pine-announce.html
-------------------------------------------------------------
--
-------------------------------------------------------------
For information about this mailing list, see:
http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/pine-announce.html
-------------------------------------------------------------

From [email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 26 Oct 2000 16:48:51 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id QAA07843;
Thu, 26 Oct 2000 16:48:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from list1.u.washington.edu ([email protected] [140.142.8.99])
by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id QAA32583;
Thu, 26 Oct 2000 16:48:47 -0700
Received: from host ([email protected] [140.142.56.13])
by list1.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id QAA36726;
Thu, 26 Oct 2000 16:47:38 -0700
Received: from mxu3.u.washington.edu (mxu3.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.7])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id QAA48054
for <[email protected]>; Thu, 26 Oct 2000 16:46:44 -0700
Received: from owned.lab6.com (IDENT:root@[212.158.123.230])
by mxu3.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id QAA13458
for <[email protected]>; Thu, 26 Oct 2000 16:46:43 -0700
Received: from localhost (gossi@localhost)
by owned.lab6.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id AAA28649;
Fri, 27 Oct 2000 00:46:31 +0100
Message-Id: <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2000 00:46:31 +0100 (BST)
Sender: [email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
From: Gossi The Dog <[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Pine 4.30 now available
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GUL.4.30.0010261609310.22045-100000@shiva2.cac.washington.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-To: Steve Hubert <[email protected]>
X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN

On Thu, 26 Oct 2000, Steve Hubert wrote:

<snip>

Using pine 4.30 now... Compiled manually on Cobalt Linux 5.0 without
problems...

Should be interesting to see how it fairs in the next few days before I
move it to the production environment :)

From [email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 26 Oct 2000 17:09:10 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.1])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id RAA23088;
Thu, 26 Oct 2000 17:09:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from list4.u.washington.edu ([email protected] [140.142.14.167])
by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id RAA21569;
Thu, 26 Oct 2000 17:09:08 -0700
Received: from host ([email protected] [140.142.56.13])
by list4.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id RAA23106;
Thu, 26 Oct 2000 17:08:02 -0700
Received: from mxu3.u.washington.edu (mxu3.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.7])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id RAA170830
for <[email protected]>; Thu, 26 Oct 2000 17:06:36 -0700
Received: from kilo.clearoption.com (kilo.clearoption.com [205.200.121.30])
by mxu3.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id RAA17065
for <[email protected]>; Thu, 26 Oct 2000 17:06:36 -0700
Received: from ctech404 (link.clearoption.com [205.200.121.51])
by kilo.clearoption.com (Postfix) with SMTP
id 12B5310682; Thu, 26 Oct 2000 19:06:35 -0500 (CDT)
Message-Id: <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2000 19:05:07 -0500
Sender: [email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
From: "John Lange" <[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
Subject: RE: Pine 4.30 now available
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GUL.4.30.0010261609310.22045-100000@shiva2.cac.washington.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-To: "pine-info" <[email protected]>,
"Steve Hubert" <[email protected]>
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN

Don't know if you want to know about sucessful builds or not, but here it
anyhow:

Built Pine on Slackware 7.1 ("./build slx").

Built and ran no problem.

Yay!! I can use Pine again!!! (until the next exploit :\ )

John Lange

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]]On Behalf Of Steve Hubert
Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2000 6:10 PM
To: Pine Discussion Forum
Subject: Pine 4.30 now available

This note is to announce the availability of the Pine Message System
version 4.30. This latest release introduces some new features and fixes
a number of bugs found in earlier releases.

More specific information can be found in the built-in release notes ("R"
off the Main Menu), and via:

http://www.cac.washington.edu/pine/
and
ftp://ftp.cac.washington.edu/pine/docs/

Source for the latest Pine release is available in:

ftp://ftp.cac.washington.edu/pine/pine.tar.Z
and
ftp://ftp.cac.washington.edu/pine/pine.tar.gz

and precompiled binaries for the various systems we have direct access to
are available in:

ftp://ftp.cac.washington.edu/pine/unix-bin
and
ftp://ftp.cac.washington.edu/pine/unix-bin-compressed

The corresponding PC-Pine distribution is available in:

ftp://ftp.cac.washington.edu/pine/pcpine/pm430w32.zip

As with all Pine releases, it is important that you carefully test and
determine for yourself that it performs suitably in your environment
before placing Pine into production use.

The Pine Development Team

--
-------------------------------------------------------------
For information about this mailing list, see:
http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/pine-announce.html
-------------------------------------------------------------
--
-------------------------------------------------------------
For information about this mailing list, see:
http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/pine-announce.html
-------------------------------------------------------------

--
-----------------------------------------------------------------
For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see:
http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/
-----------------------------------------------------------------

From [email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Fri, 27 Oct 2000 06:01:26 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id GAA21140;
Fri, 27 Oct 2000 06:01:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from list4.u.washington.edu ([email protected] [140.142.14.167])
by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id GAA15803;
Fri, 27 Oct 2000 06:01:23 -0700
Received: from host ([email protected] [140.142.56.13])
by list4.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id FAA20698;
Fri, 27 Oct 2000 05:58:38 -0700
Received: from mxu4.u.washington.edu (mxu4.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.8])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id FAA130298
for <[email protected]>; Fri, 27 Oct 2000 05:50:46 -0700
Received: from zeus.med.uottawa.ca (zeus.med.uottawa.ca [137.122.224.2])
by mxu4.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id FAA18062
for <[email protected]>; Fri, 27 Oct 2000 05:50:46 -0700
Received: from localhost (nbirkett@localhost)
by zeus.med.uottawa.ca (8.9.1/8.8.8) with SMTP id IAA02923;
Fri, 27 Oct 2000 08:49:50 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2000 08:49:50 -0400 (EDT)
Sender: [email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
From: "Nick Birkett (x8289)" <[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Pine 4.30 now available
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GUL.4.30.0010261609310.22045-100000@shiva2.cac.washington.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-To: Steve Hubert <[email protected]>
X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN

This may be a dumb question but.....

We hav used pine for years on a SUN UNIX system. I am trying to up-grade
to 4.30. I got the SUN binaries from the PIne ftp site. However, when I
run the new version on our SUN, it doesn't seem to find the mail files:
every account comes up with an empty mail box even though I know there are
40+ messages in the accounts. I have been unable to find any installation
information which might explain this problem. CAn someone help me out
here?

Many thanks.

========================================================================
Nicholas Birkett, M.D., M.Sc.
Epidemiology and Community Medicine
University of Ottawa [email protected]
451 Smyth Rd., (613)-562-5800 x 8289 (voice)
Ottawa, Ontario, (613)-562-5465 (fax)
Canada. K1H 8M5
=========================================================================

From [email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Fri, 27 Oct 2000 09:31:46 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id JAA19180;
Fri, 27 Oct 2000 09:31:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from list2.u.washington.edu ([email protected] [140.142.14.165])
by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id JAA21414;
Fri, 27 Oct 2000 09:31:45 -0700
Received: from host ([email protected] [140.142.56.13])
by list2.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id JAA19264;
Fri, 27 Oct 2000 09:29:45 -0700
Received: from mxu3.u.washington.edu (mxu3.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.7])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id JAA209654
for <[email protected]>; Fri, 27 Oct 2000 09:28:07 -0700
Received: from law.usc.edu (law.usc.edu [128.125.42.6])
by mxu3.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id JAA20046
for <[email protected]>; Fri, 27 Oct 2000 09:28:07 -0700
Received: from l2124.usc.edu (l2124 [128.125.42.66])
by law.usc.edu (Pro-8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id JAA17251
for <[email protected]>; Fri, 27 Oct 2000 09:33:53 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2000 09:27:23 -0700 (Pacific Daylight Time)
Sender: [email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
From: Robert Larmon <[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
Subject: PC-Pine 4.30 - love it so far, 2 issues...
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
X-X-Sender: [email protected]
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN

Okay, so I love the remote config of PC-Pine 4.30. Pretty easy, although
my users might freak the first time I show them how to use it. (Note to
developers: Who do we make the check out to? j/k) Anyways...

I have two minor issues.

1. The remote_pinerc doesn't take into account any form letters that we
may have created in PC-Pine. For instance, I have a number of generic
forms that I send to people for various tech related issues. It would be
really cool if we could have a "remote_forms" file as well, so that I
could send form letters, no matter where I am. (This is probably for the
suggestion box, but I want to see what other people think first.)

2. I'm getting an error message when I compose a message:

"{server-name}/usr/local/lib/imap/global_ad: Can't get write access to
mail."

Now, I DO know this has something to do with the global_addressbook for
imap, but I DON'T know precisely what the issue is, nor how to fix it. I
guess I could tinker with the permissions and try to find something on the
pine site, but I don't have time to really investigate further until next
week and I am hoping someone can help me out.

Thanks,

RCL

```````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````
` Robert Larmon `
` PC Systems Analyst `
` USC Law School Computing Services `
` [email protected] `
'''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''

--
-----------------------------------------------------------------
For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see:
http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/
-----------------------------------------------------------------

From [email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Fri, 27 Oct 2000 10:02:02 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.1])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id KAA13720;
Fri, 27 Oct 2000 10:02:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from list1.u.washington.edu ([email protected] [140.142.8.99])
by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id KAA10808;
Fri, 27 Oct 2000 10:02:00 -0700
Received: from host ([email protected] [140.142.56.13])
by list1.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id JAA42456;
Fri, 27 Oct 2000 09:59:20 -0700
Received: from mxu1.u.washington.edu (mxu1.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.8])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id JAA206434
for <[email protected]>; Fri, 27 Oct 2000 09:53:11 -0700
Received: from mail.nic.mx (mail.nic.mx [200.23.1.17])
by mxu1.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id JAA15214
for <[email protected]>; Fri, 27 Oct 2000 09:52:45 -0700
Received: from mail (mail [200.23.1.17])
by mail.nic.mx (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA17103;
Fri, 27 Oct 2000 11:53:03 -0500 (CDT)
Message-Id: <Pine.GSO.4.21.0010271130420.12610-100000@mail>
Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2000 11:53:03 -0500 (CDT)
Sender: [email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
From: Francisco Arias <[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Pine 4.30 now available
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GUL.4.30.0010261609310.22045-100000@shiva2.cac.washington.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-To: Steve Hubert <[email protected]>, [email protected]
X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
X-Sender: farias@mail
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN

Hi,

I'm having trouble compiling pine 4.30 on Solaris 2.6 and Solaris
8 (both Sparc) with gcc 2.95.1 and 2.95.2, respectively.

I get this:

$ build gs5
make args are CC=gcc
.. snip ...
gcc -g -O2 -c mbx.c
mbx.c: In function `mbx_hdrpos':
mbx.c:1371: internal error--unrecognizable insn:
(insn 78 76 80 (set (reg:SI 129)
(minus:SI (const_int 4 [0x4])
(const_int -4096 [0xfffff000]))) -1 (nil)
(expr_list:REG_EQUAL (const_int 4100 [0x1004])
(nil)))
*** Error code 1
make: Fatal error: Command failed for target `mbx.o'
Current working directory /usr/local/src/pine4.30/imap/c-client
*** Error code 1
make: Fatal error: Command failed for target `gso'
Current working directory /usr/local/src/pine4.30/imap/c-client
*** Error code 1
make: Fatal error: Command failed for target `OSTYPE'
Current working directory /usr/local/src/pine4.30/imap
*** Error code 1
make: Fatal error: Command failed for target `gso'

-------- then it continues but at the end it says:

make: Fatal error: Don't know how to make target `../c-client/c-client.a'

Links to executables are in bin directory:
size: bin/pine: cannot open
size: bin/mtest: cannot open
size: bin/imapd: cannot open
bin/pico: 288693 + 5724 + 4088 = 298505
bin/pilot: 285901 + 5596 + 4088 = 295585
Done

Any hints? Has someone have been able to compile it on Solaris
2.x?

Thanks,

fjac

From [email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Fri, 27 Oct 2000 10:46:01 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id KAA19574;
Fri, 27 Oct 2000 10:45:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from list3.u.washington.edu ([email protected] [140.142.8.100])
by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id KAA24015;
Fri, 27 Oct 2000 10:45:59 -0700
Received: from host ([email protected] [140.142.56.13])
by list3.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id KAA14364;
Fri, 27 Oct 2000 10:43:00 -0700
Received: from mxu3.u.washington.edu (mxu3.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.7])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id KAA134598
for <[email protected]>; Fri, 27 Oct 2000 10:40:00 -0700
Received: from usceast.cs.sc.edu (usceast.cs.sc.edu [129.252.11.9])
by mxu3.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id KAA30817
for <[email protected]>; Fri, 27 Oct 2000 10:08:05 -0700
Received: from antares.cs.sc.edu (antares.cs.sc.edu [129.252.130.103])
by usceast.cs.sc.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA71756
for <[email protected]>; Fri, 27 Oct 2000 13:08:04 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (gopalan@localhost)
by antares.cs.sc.edu (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA07035
for <[email protected]>; Fri, 27 Oct 2000 13:08:04 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2000 13:08:03 -0400 (EDT)
Sender: [email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
From: Gopi Sundaram <[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Pine 4.30 now available
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.21.0010271130420.12610-100000@mail>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
X-Authentication-Warning: antares.cs.sc.edu: gopalan owned process doing -bs
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN

On Fri, 27 Oct 2000, Francisco Arias wrote:

> I'm having trouble compiling pine 4.30 on Solaris 2.6 and Solaris
> 8 (both Sparc) with gcc 2.95.1 and 2.95.2, respectively.

<snip>

> Any hints? Has someone have been able to compile it on Solaris
> 2.x?

Mark Crispin posted a solution in comp.mail.pine yesterday. Here is a
link to his message on deja.com

http://x72.deja.com/[ST_rn=ps]/getdoc.xp?AN=686340733

Gopi.

--
Gopi Sundaram
[email protected]
http://www.cse.sc.edu/~gopalan/Pine/

From [email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Fri, 27 Oct 2000 11:18:24 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.1])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id LAA21999;
Fri, 27 Oct 2000 11:18:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from list3.u.washington.edu ([email protected] [140.142.8.100])
by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id LAA13391;
Fri, 27 Oct 2000 11:18:23 -0700
Received: from host ([email protected] [140.142.56.13])
by list3.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id LAA36740;
Fri, 27 Oct 2000 11:16:07 -0700
Received: from mxu4.u.washington.edu (mxu4.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.8])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id LAA91092
for <[email protected]>; Fri, 27 Oct 2000 11:13:08 -0700
Received: from mail.nic.mx (mail.nic.mx [200.23.1.17])
by mxu4.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id LAA09810
for <[email protected]>; Fri, 27 Oct 2000 11:13:07 -0700
Received: from mail (mail [200.23.1.17])
by mail.nic.mx (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA20678;
Fri, 27 Oct 2000 13:13:25 -0500 (CDT)
Message-Id: <Pine.GSO.4.21.0010271312120.12610-100000@mail>
Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2000 13:13:25 -0500 (CDT)
Sender: [email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
From: Francisco Arias <[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Pine 4.30 now available #001027@09:52:52.17132
In-Reply-To: <Pine.NXT.4.30.0010271017150.5303-100000@Tomobiki-Cho.CAC.Washington.EDU>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-To: Mark Crispin <[email protected]>
X-Cc: [email protected],
Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>,
X-Sender: farias@mail
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN

Thanks, the patch does works.

fjac

On Fri, 27 Oct 2000, Mark Crispin wrote:

> > When I attempt the compile, I run into this:
> >
> > gcc -g -O2 -c mbx.c -o mbx.o
> > mbx.c: In function `mbx_hdrpos':
> > mbx.c:1371: internal error--unrecognizable insn:
> > (insn 78 76 80 (set (reg:SI 129)
> > (minus:SI (const_int 4 [0x4])
> > (const_int -4096 [0xfffff000]))) -1 (nil)
> > (expr_list:REG_EQUAL (const_int 4100 [0x1004])
> > (nil)))
> > make[3]: *** [mbx.o] Error 1
>
> This is a known problem with GCC 2.95 on Solaris. It's a compiler bug.
> The problem does not happen with earlier versions of GCC (e.g. 2.8 or
> 2.7).
>
> I just received an email claiming that a successful workaround is to
> change line 1336 of mbx.c from
> LOCAL->buf = (char *) fs_get ((LOCAL->buflen = HDRBUFLEN) + SLOP);
> to
> LOCAL->buflen = HDRBUFLEN;
> LOCAL->buf = (char *) fs_get (LOCAL->buflen + SLOP);
>
> I have no way of checking to see if that actually fixes it or not; our
> lab's Solaris system seems to have bit the dust.
>
> In any case, I recommend rolling back to GCC 2.8 simply because this kind
> of compiler bug calls into question the overall trustworthiness of that
> version of the compiler.
>
> -- Mark --
>
> http://staff.washington.edu/mrc
> Science does not emerge from voting, party politics, or public debate.
>
>
>

From [email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Fri, 27 Oct 2000 13:03:40 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id NAA00015;
Fri, 27 Oct 2000 13:03:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from list1.u.washington.edu ([email protected] [140.142.8.99])
by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id NAA28310;
Fri, 27 Oct 2000 13:03:38 -0700
Received: from host ([email protected] [140.142.56.13])
by list1.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id NAA35962;
Fri, 27 Oct 2000 13:01:20 -0700
Received: from mxu1.u.washington.edu (mxu1.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.8])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id MAA178074
for <[email protected]>; Fri, 27 Oct 2000 12:59:44 -0700
Received: from office.x-networks.de ([email protected] [62.54.53.214])
by mxu1.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id MAA27437
for <[email protected]>; Fri, 27 Oct 2000 12:59:41 -0700
Received: from localhost (jb@localhost [127.0.0.1])
by office.x-networks.de (8.10.0.Beta12/8.10.0.Beta12) with ESMTP id e9RJxcv32125
for <[email protected]>; Fri, 27 Oct 2000 21:59:39 +0200
Message-Id: <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2000 21:59:34 +0200 (CEST)
Sender: [email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
From: Joern Bredereck <[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
Subject: Filtering on scores
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-To: <[email protected]>
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN

Hi,

I have a problem with the scoring/filterin in pine. I tried to setup
following:

I defined a scoring for all emails addressed to my address
"[email protected]" with a score of 99. After that, I defined a filter for
all scores between -INF and 1 (-INF,1) in my inbox to move those emails to
the folder "notdirect".

All emails with a score of more than 1 should stay in the inbox, and all
others, that did'nt match the To:-Header should be moved, but this doesn't
work.

When I'm sorting for the score I can see, that spam mails, which are not
addressed to "[email protected]" are sorted to the top of the list. So the
scoring seems to be working. But the filtering doesn't. I even changed the
filter for filtering all matches for the scores -INF,+INF but even this
did'nt work. All emails remained in my Inbox and weren't moved to the
other folder as supposed to by this filtering-rule.

What am I doing wrong?

Thanks for your help!

Bye,

jb

--
-----------------------------------------------------------------
For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see:
http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/
-----------------------------------------------------------------

From [email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Fri, 27 Oct 2000 13:30:08 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id NAA11392;
Fri, 27 Oct 2000 13:30:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from list1.u.washington.edu ([email protected] [140.142.8.99])
by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id NAA29003;
Fri, 27 Oct 2000 13:30:06 -0700
Received: from host ([email protected] [140.142.56.13])
by list1.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id NAA34442;
Fri, 27 Oct 2000 13:29:00 -0700
Received: from mxu4.u.washington.edu (mxu4.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.8])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id NAA387812
for <[email protected]>; Fri, 27 Oct 2000 13:28:13 -0700
Received: from falcon.dickinson.edu ([205.146.146.166])
by mxu4.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id NAA05760
for <[email protected]>; Fri, 27 Oct 2000 13:28:13 -0700
Received: from localhost by falcon.dickinson.edu (8.8.8/1.1.22.3/25Feb99-0911AM)
id QAA0000031523; Fri, 27 Oct 2000 16:28:09 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2000 16:28:08 -0400 (EDT)
Sender: [email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
From: Don Newcomer <[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
Subject: Pine 4.30
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-To: Pine Info mailing list <[email protected]>
X-Authentication-Warning: falcon.dickinson.edu: newcomer owned process doing -bs
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN

I just built Pine 4.30 under Digital UNIX 4.0E and 4.0F. For some reason,
both versions no longer see my global addressbooks. If I go back to Pine
4.21 they magically reappear so there's nothing wrong with my config
files. Anyone else run into this?

================================================================================
Don Newcomer Dickinson College
Associate Director, System and Network Services P.O. Box 1773
[email protected] Carlisle, PA 17013
Phone: (717) 245-1699
FAX: (717) 245-1690

--
-----------------------------------------------------------------
For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see:
http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/
-----------------------------------------------------------------

From [email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Fri, 27 Oct 2000 18:01:14 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id SAA08983;
Fri, 27 Oct 2000 18:01:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from list4.u.washington.edu ([email protected] [140.142.14.167])
by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id SAA04778;
Fri, 27 Oct 2000 18:01:13 -0700
Received: from host ([email protected] [140.142.56.13])
by list4.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id RAA24398;
Fri, 27 Oct 2000 17:59:27 -0700
Received: from mxu4.u.washington.edu (mxu4.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.8])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id RAA15988
for <[email protected]>; Fri, 27 Oct 2000 17:58:04 -0700
Received: from mailman.packetdesign.com (dns.PACKETDESIGN.NET [216.15.46.10])
by mxu4.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id RAA22269
for <[email protected]>; Fri, 27 Oct 2000 17:58:04 -0700
Received: from ash.packetdesign.com (ash.packetdesign.com [192.168.0.243])
by mailman.packetdesign.com (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id e9S0vjQ52195;
Fri, 27 Oct 2000 17:57:45 -0700 (PDT)
(envelope-from [email protected])
Message-Id: <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2000 17:58:04 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: [email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
From: Stephen Casner <[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Pine 4.30 now available
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-Sender: [email protected]
X-To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN

I'm very pleased that two of my enhancement requests were included in
4.30, and one of them having been made quite recently.

My only nit is that the segmenting of "patterns=" into
"patterns-indexcolors=" and "patterns-roles=", etc. in the config file
means that running the 4.30 on an old config ignores all the existing
roles. Recreating patterns from scratch is a lot of work. I worked
around this by using the -pinerc command line option to see what the
new variable names were, then sorting my patterns into the appropriate
new labels. After that, all seems well so far.
-- Steve

From [email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Fri, 27 Oct 2000 22:51:00 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.1])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id WAA00853;
Fri, 27 Oct 2000 22:50:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from list1.u.washington.edu ([email protected] [140.142.8.99])
by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id WAA30879;
Fri, 27 Oct 2000 22:50:56 -0700
Received: from host ([email protected] [140.142.56.13])
by list1.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id WAA07426;
Fri, 27 Oct 2000 22:49:24 -0700
Received: from mxu1.u.washington.edu (mxu1.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.8])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id WAA367468
for <[email protected]>; Fri, 27 Oct 2000 22:47:39 -0700
Received: from mxout1.cac.washington.edu (mxout1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.5])
by mxu1.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id WAA09778
for <[email protected]>; Fri, 27 Oct 2000 22:47:39 -0700
Received: from shiva2.cac.washington.edu (shiva2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.100.202])
by mxout1.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id WAA06548
for <[email protected]>; Fri, 27 Oct 2000 22:47:39 -0700
Received: from localhost (hubert@localhost)
by shiva2.cac.washington.edu (8.10.1+UW00.04/8.10.1+UW00.04) with ESMTP id e9S5lcB11820
for <[email protected]>; Fri, 27 Oct 2000 22:47:38 -0700
Message-Id: <Pine.GUL.4.31.0010272245360.11554-100000@shiva2.cac.washington.edu>
Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2000 22:47:37 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: [email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
From: Steve Hubert <[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Pine 4.30 now available
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN

The first time you run 4.30 it is supposed to read in the patterns
variable and sort them into the appropriate new patterns- vars for you. It
should do that if there isn't already a value in one of the new variables,
which it uses as a clue that 4.30 has been run before and the patterns
have already been copied. Do you think it failed to do the copy? Thanks.

--
Steve Hubert <[email protected]>
Networks and Distributed Computing, Univ. of Washington, Seattle

On Fri, 27 Oct 2000, Stephen Casner wrote:

> I'm very pleased that two of my enhancement requests were included in
> 4.30, and one of them having been made quite recently.
>
> My only nit is that the segmenting of "patterns=" into
> "patterns-indexcolors=" and "patterns-roles=", etc. in the config file
> means that running the 4.30 on an old config ignores all the existing
> roles. Recreating patterns from scratch is a lot of work. I worked
> around this by using the -pinerc command line option to see what the
> new variable names were, then sorting my patterns into the appropriate
> new labels. After that, all seems well so far.
> -- Steve
>
>
>
>

From [email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Sun, 29 Oct 2000 01:18:42 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.1])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id BAA00230;
Sun, 29 Oct 2000 01:18:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from list3.u.washington.edu ([email protected] [140.142.8.100])
by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id BAA24179;
Sun, 29 Oct 2000 01:18:40 -0700
Received: from host ([email protected] [140.142.56.13])
by list3.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id BAA35234;
Sun, 29 Oct 2000 01:17:09 -0700
Received: from mxu3.u.washington.edu (mxu3.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.7])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id AAA83706
for <[email protected]>; Sun, 29 Oct 2000 00:53:15 -0700
Received: from mailman.packetdesign.com (dns.PACKETDESIGN.NET [216.15.46.10])
by mxu3.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id AAA04914
for <[email protected]>; Sun, 29 Oct 2000 00:53:14 -0700
Received: from localhost.cisco.com (main-fw-eth1.packetdesign.com [192.168.0.254])
by mailman.packetdesign.com (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id e9T7qbQ61714;
Sun, 29 Oct 2000 00:52:37 -0700 (PDT)
(envelope-from [email protected])
Message-Id: <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2000 01:14:07 -0700 (Pacific Daylight Time)
Sender: [email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
From: Stephen Casner <[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Pine 4.30 now available
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-Sender: [email protected]
X-To: Steve Hubert <[email protected]>
X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN

Steve,

> The first time you run 4.30 it is supposed to read in the patterns
> variable and sort them into the appropriate new patterns- vars for you. It
> should do that if there isn't already a value in one of the new variables,
> which it uses as a clue that 4.30 has been run before and the patterns
> have already been copied. Do you think it failed to do the copy? Thanks.

Ah, good, that's what I expected it should do. I think I know why it
didn't work for me: I have been using the technique from Nancy's web
page to keep the main config in one file invoked with -P and the
exceptions in another file invoked with -p. The patterns are in the
former, which does not get updated by pine. The new -x feature would
have solved that problem if I had learned about that and changed my
shortcut before boldly dropping in the new binaries and cranking them
up.
-- Steve

From [email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Sun, 29 Oct 2000 10:10:30 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id KAA26754;
Sun, 29 Oct 2000 10:10:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from list3.u.washington.edu ([email protected] [140.142.8.100])
by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id KAA12479;
Sun, 29 Oct 2000 10:10:27 -0800
Received: from host ([email protected] [140.142.56.13])
by list3.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id KAA20158;
Sun, 29 Oct 2000 10:09:07 -0800
Received: from mxu3.u.washington.edu (mxu3.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.7])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id KAA156594
for <[email protected]>; Sun, 29 Oct 2000 10:06:27 -0800
Received: from lcjdap.soroscj.ro (lcjdap.soroscj.ro [193.226.84.253])
by mxu3.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id KAA31779
for <[email protected]>; Sun, 29 Oct 2000 10:06:24 -0800
Received: (qmail 6108 invoked by uid 559); 29 Oct 2000 18:04:32 -0000
Received: from localhost ([email protected])
by localhost with SMTP; 29 Oct 2000 18:04:32 -0000
Message-Id: <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2000 20:04:32 +0200 (EET)
Sender: [email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
From: Seby <[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
Subject: accents...
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-To: <[email protected]>
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN

I put the patch a compiled pine and how do i write the accents..

with ^\'a doesnt work...

Seby...

---------------
-=Ionita Sebastian=-
http://lcjdap.soroscj/~seby
E-mail: [email protected]
---------------
Schizophrenia beats being alone.

--
-----------------------------------------------------------------
For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see:
http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/
-----------------------------------------------------------------

From [email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Sun, 29 Oct 2000 13:43:00 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id NAA09273;
Sun, 29 Oct 2000 13:42:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: from list1.u.washington.edu ([email protected] [140.142.8.99])
by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id NAA15755;
Sun, 29 Oct 2000 13:42:56 -0800
Received: from host ([email protected] [140.142.56.13])
by list1.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id NAA37730;
Sun, 29 Oct 2000 13:41:02 -0800
Received: from mxu3.u.washington.edu (mxu3.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.7])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id NAA164952
for <[email protected]>; Sun, 29 Oct 2000 13:39:02 -0800
Received: from smtp04.primenet.com (smtp04.primenet.com [206.165.6.134])
by mxu3.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id NAA12677
for <[email protected]>; Sun, 29 Oct 2000 13:39:01 -0800
Received: (from daemon@localhost)
by smtp04.primenet.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id OAA03886
for <[email protected]>; Sun, 29 Oct 2000 14:35:48 -0700 (MST)
Received: from usr08.primenet.com(206.165.6.208)
via SMTP by smtp04.primenet.com, id smtpdAAAboaaCh; Sun Oct 29 14:35:38 2000
Received: from localhost (ricklew@localhost)
by usr08.primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id OAA29850
for <[email protected]>; Sun, 29 Oct 2000 14:38:48 -0700 (MST)
Message-Id: <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2000 14:38:47 -0700 (MST)
Sender: [email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
From: Rick Lewis <[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
Subject: error in Building Pine on BSD2 (fwd)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-Authentication-Warning: usr08.primenet.com: ricklew owned process doing -bs
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN

I tried building Pine 4.30 on a BSD2.1 system, something I've done
successfully with versions 4.10 and 4.21.
The build never completes. Instead, the following error is issued:
_________________________________________________

takeaddr.o os.
o date.c ../pico/libpico.a ../c-client/c-client.a -ltermlib `cat
./c-client/
LDFLAGS`
ld: No such file or directory for ../c-client/c-client.a
*** Error code 1

Stop.

Links to executables are in bin directory:
size: bin/pine: No such file or directory
size: bin/mtest: No such file or directory
size: bin/imapd: No such file or directory
text data bss dec hex
258048 12288 7036 277372 43b7c bin/pico
253952 12288 6908 273148 42afc bin/pilot
Done

_____________________________________________
Thus, pico and pilot are created in the bin directory but not Pine.
I'm not a Unix expert by any means, but am gunzipping and using tar
to create the Pine package and doing the build.
I'm using the pine4.30.tar.gz package from the FTP site.
Is there anything I can do to prevent this error?
By the way, the precompiled freebsd binary works great on another
provider.
--Rick Lewis

--
-----------------------------------------------------------------
For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see:
http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/
-----------------------------------------------------------------

From [email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Sun, 29 Oct 2000 16:05:59 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id QAA05548;
Sun, 29 Oct 2000 16:05:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from list2.u.washington.edu ([email protected] [140.142.14.165])
by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id QAA18033;
Sun, 29 Oct 2000 16:05:56 -0800
Received: from host ([email protected] [140.142.56.13])
by list2.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id QAA09606;
Sun, 29 Oct 2000 16:04:32 -0800
Received: from mxu3.u.washington.edu (mxu3.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.7])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id QAA304268
for <[email protected]>; Sun, 29 Oct 2000 16:02:51 -0800
Received: from blount.mail.mindspring.net (blount.mail.mindspring.net [207.69.200.226])
by mxu3.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id QAA23246
for <[email protected]>; Sun, 29 Oct 2000 16:02:51 -0800
Received: from computer (user-33qsdep.dialup.mindspring.com [199.174.53.217])
by blount.mail.mindspring.net (8.9.3/8.8.5) with SMTP id TAA08764
for <[email protected]>; Sun, 29 Oct 2000 19:02:49 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <003201c04204$e7215e40$d935aec7@computer>
Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2000 18:03:57 -0600
Sender: [email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
From: "Raghuram Kalletla" <[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
Subject: problems sending e-mail
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="----=_NextPart_000_002F_01C041D2.9B9450E0"
X-To: <[email protected]>
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2615.200
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

------=_NextPart_000_002F_01C041D2.9B9450E0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hello All!
I am having problems configuring Pine to send e-mail. When =
I try to compose a message and send it, I get this message:

[>Pipe can't access "/usr/lib/sendmail": No such file or directory<]=20

and it makes sense because the path for sendmail on the computer is =
"/usr/sbin/sendmail". How do I tell Pine to use the correct path? =
Thanks!

Raghuram

------=_NextPart_000_002F_01C041D2.9B9450E0
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META content=3D"text/html; charset=3Diso-8859-1" =
http-equiv=3DContent-Type>
<META content=3D"MSHTML 5.00.2614.3500" name=3DGENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Hello All!</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial=20
size=3D2>          &nbs=
p; =20
I am having problems configuring Pine to send e-mail. When I try to =
compose a=20
message and send it, I get this message:</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>[>Pipe can't access =
"/usr/lib/sendmail": No such=20
file or directory<] </FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>and it makes sense because the path for =
sendmail on=20
the computer is "/usr/sbin/sendmail". How do I tell Pine to use the =
correct=20
path? Thanks!</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Raghuram</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV></BODY></HTML>

------=_NextPart_000_002F_01C041D2.9B9450E0--

--
-----------------------------------------------------------------
For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see:
http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/
-----------------------------------------------------------------

From [email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Sun, 29 Oct 2000 16:18:58 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id QAA14794;
Sun, 29 Oct 2000 16:18:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from list3.u.washington.edu ([email protected] [140.142.8.100])
by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id QAA18316;
Sun, 29 Oct 2000 16:18:56 -0800
Received: from host ([email protected] [140.142.56.13])
by list3.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id QAA20068;
Sun, 29 Oct 2000 16:17:36 -0800
Received: from mxu4.u.washington.edu (mxu4.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.8])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id QAA219278
for <[email protected]>; Sun, 29 Oct 2000 16:16:07 -0800
Received: from localhost.edlund.org (m96.ryd.student.liu.se [130.236.214.96])
by mxu4.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id QAA23162
for <[email protected]>; Sun, 29 Oct 2000 16:16:06 -0800
Received: by localhost.edlund.org (Postfix, from userid 500)
id AEA8541052; Mon, 30 Oct 2000 01:16:01 +0100 (CET)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by localhost.edlund.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 9A9D141051; Mon, 30 Oct 2000 01:16:01 +0100 (CET)
Message-Id: <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2000 01:16:01 +0100 (CET)
Sender: [email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
From: Henrik Edlund <[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: problems sending e-mail
In-Reply-To: <003201c04204$e7215e40$d935aec7@computer>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-To: Raghuram Kalletla <[email protected]>
X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN

On Sun, 29 Oct 2000, Raghuram Kalletla wrote:

> Hello All!
> I am having problems configuring Pine to send e-mail.
> When I try to compose a message and send it, I get this message:
>
> [>Pipe can't access "/usr/lib/sendmail": No such file or directory<]
>
> and it makes sense because the path for sendmail on the computer is
> "/usr/sbin/sendmail". How do I tell Pine to use the correct path?
> Thanks!

In your Pine config set the variable

sendmail-path

to

/usr/sbin/sendmail

--
http://www.edlund.org/

"They were in the wrong place at the wrong time.
Naturally they became heroes."
Leia Organa of Alderaan, Senator

From [email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Mon, 30 Oct 2000 02:56:46 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id CAA00141;
Mon, 30 Oct 2000 02:56:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from list2.u.washington.edu ([email protected] [140.142.14.165])
by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id CAA28764;
Mon, 30 Oct 2000 02:56:43 -0800
Received: from host ([email protected] [140.142.56.13])
by list2.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id CAA29356;
Mon, 30 Oct 2000 02:55:31 -0800
Received: from mxu3.u.washington.edu (mxu3.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.7])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id CAA112942
for <[email protected]>; Mon, 30 Oct 2000 02:52:52 -0800
Received: from maddler.net (IDENT:[email protected] [195.120.189.37])
by mxu3.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id CAA04777
for <[email protected]>; Mon, 30 Oct 2000 02:52:48 -0800
Received: from localhost (maddler@localhost)
by maddler.net (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id LAA02365
for <[email protected]>; Mon, 30 Oct 2000 11:58:48 +0100
Message-Id: <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2000 11:58:48 +0100 (CET)
Sender: [email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
From: William Maddler <[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
Subject: keys not working in 4.30 linux
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN

Just installe 4.30 on my linuxbox...
but... I'm unable to use ":", ";" and "A"... and maybe some other
key... any clue?

thx... :)

<FUN> +-----------------------------+
<HAPPINESS> | William::Maddler |
Gimme a Beer! +-----------------------------+
</HAPPINESS> bid.it - maddler.net - ecn.org
</FUN> pollodigomma.org

Message released under the GNU/GPL license.

--
-----------------------------------------------------------------
For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see:
http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/
-----------------------------------------------------------------

From [email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Mon, 30 Oct 2000 06:01:57 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id GAA03792;
Mon, 30 Oct 2000 06:01:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from list2.u.washington.edu ([email protected] [140.142.14.165])
by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id GAA32247;
Mon, 30 Oct 2000 06:01:55 -0800
Received: from host ([email protected] [140.142.56.13])
by list2.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id GAA18452;
Mon, 30 Oct 2000 06:00:27 -0800
Received: from mxu2.u.washington.edu (mxu2.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.9])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id FAA304220
for <[email protected]>; Mon, 30 Oct 2000 05:58:22 -0800
Received: from usceast.cs.sc.edu (usceast.cs.sc.edu [129.252.11.9])
by mxu2.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id FAA30811
for <[email protected]>; Mon, 30 Oct 2000 05:58:21 -0800
Received: from pearl.cs.sc.edu (pearl.cs.sc.edu [129.252.130.40])
by usceast.cs.sc.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id IAA01617
for <[email protected]>; Mon, 30 Oct 2000 08:58:21 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost (gopalan@localhost)
by pearl.cs.sc.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id IAA00540
for <[email protected]>; Mon, 30 Oct 2000 08:58:21 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2000 08:58:20 -0500 (EST)
Sender: [email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
From: Gopi Sundaram <[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: keys not working in 4.30 linux
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
X-Authentication-Warning: pearl.cs.sc.edu: gopalan owned process doing -bs
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN

On Mon, 30 Oct 2000, William Maddler wrote:

> but... I'm unable to use ":", ";" and "A"... and maybe some other
> key... any clue?

[X] enable-aggregate-command-set

Make sure that it is checked in (M)ain (S)etup (C)onfig

Gopi.

--
Gopi Sundaram
[email protected]
http://www.cse.sc.edu/~gopalan/Pine/

From [email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Mon, 30 Oct 2000 11:27:59 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.1])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id LAA25737;
Mon, 30 Oct 2000 11:27:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: from list3.u.washington.edu ([email protected] [140.142.8.100])
by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id LAA30833;
Mon, 30 Oct 2000 11:27:58 -0800
Received: from host ([email protected] [140.142.56.13])
by list3.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id LAA03784;
Mon, 30 Oct 2000 11:25:55 -0800
Received: from mxu1.u.washington.edu (mxu1.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.8])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id LAA41492
for <[email protected]>; Mon, 30 Oct 2000 11:17:52 -0800
Received: from mxout1.cac.washington.edu (mxout1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.5])
by mxu1.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id LAA18890
for <[email protected]>; Mon, 30 Oct 2000 11:17:51 -0800
Received: from shiva2.cac.washington.edu (shiva2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.100.202])
by mxout1.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id LAA10705
for <[email protected]>; Mon, 30 Oct 2000 11:17:51 -0800
Received: from localhost (hubert@localhost)
by shiva2.cac.washington.edu (8.10.1+UW00.04/8.10.1+UW00.04) with ESMTP id e9UJHo206220
for <[email protected]>; Mon, 30 Oct 2000 11:17:51 -0800
Message-Id: <Pine.GUL.4.31.0010301110140.5215-100000@shiva2.cac.washington.edu>
Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2000 11:17:49 -0800 (PST)
Sender: [email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
From: Steve Hubert <[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Pine 4.30
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN

Don has found a bug. A configuration variable which is a list and which is
set _only_ in the fixed configuration file won't work. It will behave as
if it isn't set at all. If there is a non-NULL setting in the pine.conf
file, or the source code, or the personal config files, then things will
work correctly and the fixed setting will override those other settings. A
work-around is to also set it in the regular global configuration file,
/usr/local/lib/pine.conf. The source code fix is to change line 3342 of
../pine/init.c from

if(is_set[0] + is_set[1] + is_set[2] + is_set[3] > 0){
to
if(is_set[0] + is_set[1] + is_set[2] + is_set[3] + is_set[4] > 0){

--
Steve Hubert <[email protected]>
Networks and Distributed Computing, Univ. of Washington, Seattle

On Fri, 27 Oct 2000, Don Newcomer wrote:

> I just built Pine 4.30 under Digital UNIX 4.0E and 4.0F. For some reason,
> both versions no longer see my global addressbooks. If I go back to Pine
> 4.21 they magically reappear so there's nothing wrong with my config
> files. Anyone else run into this?

From [email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Mon, 30 Oct 2000 13:00:08 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id NAA21628;
Mon, 30 Oct 2000 13:00:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from list3.u.washington.edu ([email protected] [140.142.8.100])
by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id NAA11833;
Mon, 30 Oct 2000 13:00:04 -0800
Received: from host ([email protected] [140.142.56.13])
by list3.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id MAA25710;
Mon, 30 Oct 2000 12:58:42 -0800
Received: from mxu2.u.washington.edu (mxu2.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.9])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id MAA35872
for <[email protected]>; Mon, 30 Oct 2000 12:56:56 -0800
Received: from hoser.devel.redhat.com (IDENT:[email protected] [207.175.42.139])
by mxu2.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id MAA14721
for <[email protected]>; Mon, 30 Oct 2000 12:56:55 -0800
Received: (from teg@localhost)
by hoser.devel.redhat.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) id e9UKurI23893;
Mon, 30 Oct 2000 15:56:53 -0500
Message-Id: <[email protected]>
Date: 30 Oct 2000 15:56:53 -0500
Sender: [email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
From: [email protected] (Trond Eivind =?iso-8859-1?q?Glomsr=F8d?=)
To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Pine 4.30 now available
In-Reply-To: Steve Hubert's message of "Thu, 26 Oct 2000 16:10:15 -0700 (PDT)"
References: <Pine.GUL.4.30.0010261609310.22045-100000@shiva2.cac.washington.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Sender: [email protected]
X-To: Steve Hubert <[email protected]>
X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
X-Authentication-Warning: hoser.devel.redhat.com: teg set sender to [email protected] using -f
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN

Steve Hubert <[email protected]> writes:

> This note is to announce the availability of the Pine Message System
> version 4.30. This latest release introduces some new features and fixes
> a number of bugs found in earlier releases.

Here is a fix - without it, it segfaults when phoning home (and other
places, like sending a mail, if you bypass it). The reason is that
functions can pass NULL to it.

--- pine4.30/pine/osdep/lstcmpnt.seg Mon Oct 30 15:48:44 2000
+++ pine4.30/pine/osdep/lstcmpnt Mon Oct 30 15:50:31 2000
@@ -1,3 +1,4 @@
+
/*----------------------------------------------------------------------
Return pointer to last component of pathname.

@@ -9,8 +10,10 @@
last_cmpnt(filename)
char *filename;
{
- register char *p = NULL, *q = filename;
-
+ char *p = NULL, *q = filename;
+
+ if(filename == 0)
+ return 0;
while(q = strchr(q, '/'))
if(*++q)
p = q;

--
Trond Eivind Glomsr�d
Red Hat, Inc.

From [email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Mon, 30 Oct 2000 13:18:02 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.1])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id NAA03743;
Mon, 30 Oct 2000 13:18:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from list3.u.washington.edu ([email protected] [140.142.8.100])
by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id NAA01915;
Mon, 30 Oct 2000 13:18:01 -0800
Received: from host ([email protected] [140.142.56.13])
by list3.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id NAA22748;
Mon, 30 Oct 2000 13:16:08 -0800
Received: from mxu1.u.washington.edu (mxu1.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.8])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id NAA166688
for <[email protected]>; Mon, 30 Oct 2000 13:15:05 -0800
Received: from mxout1.cac.washington.edu (mxout1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.5])
by mxu1.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id NAA14079
for <[email protected]>; Mon, 30 Oct 2000 13:15:05 -0800
Received: from shiva2.cac.washington.edu (shiva2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.100.202])
by mxout1.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id NAA00603;
Mon, 30 Oct 2000 13:15:04 -0800
Received: from localhost (hubert@localhost)
by shiva2.cac.washington.edu (8.10.1+UW00.04/8.10.1+UW00.04) with ESMTP id e9ULF3K11682;
Mon, 30 Oct 2000 13:15:03 -0800
Message-Id: <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2000 13:15:02 -0800 (PST)
Sender: [email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
From: Steve Hubert <[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Pine 4.30 now available
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT
X-To: Trond Eivind =?iso-8859-1?q?Glomsr=F8d?= <[email protected]>
X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN

Did you compile with DEBUG turned off? If so, this is really a symptom of
another bug.

Here is a patch. It will be fixed in the next version of
pine. You can work-around the problem by leaving DEBUG defined.

In .../pine/pine.c, move line 332, which looks like

init_pinerc(pine_state);

Move that line up above line 319, which looks like

#ifdef DEBUG

--
Steve Hubert <[email protected]>
Networks and Distributed Computing, Univ. of Washington, Seattle

On 30 Oct 2000, Trond Eivind Glomsr�d wrote:

> Here is a fix - without it, it segfaults when phoning home (and other
> places, like sending a mail, if you bypass it). The reason is that
> functions can pass NULL to it.

From [email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Mon, 30 Oct 2000 14:32:28 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id OAA08559;
Mon, 30 Oct 2000 14:32:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from list4.u.washington.edu ([email protected] [140.142.14.167])
by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id OAA15116;
Mon, 30 Oct 2000 14:32:26 -0800
Received: from host ([email protected] [140.142.56.13])
by list4.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id OAA26324;
Mon, 30 Oct 2000 14:30:57 -0800
Received: from mxu2.u.washington.edu (mxu2.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.9])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id OAA98894
for <[email protected]>; Mon, 30 Oct 2000 14:29:22 -0800
Received: from hoser.devel.redhat.com (IDENT:[email protected] [207.175.42.139])
by mxu2.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id OAA03764
for <[email protected]>; Mon, 30 Oct 2000 14:29:21 -0800
Received: (from teg@localhost)
by hoser.devel.redhat.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) id e9UMTIY24629;
Mon, 30 Oct 2000 17:29:18 -0500
Message-Id: <[email protected]>
Date: 30 Oct 2000 17:29:18 -0500
Sender: [email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
From: [email protected] (Trond Eivind =?iso-8859-1?q?Glomsr=F8d?=)
To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Pine 4.30 now available
In-Reply-To: Steve Hubert's message of "Mon, 30 Oct 2000 13:15:02 -0800 (PST)"
References: <[email protected]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Sender: [email protected]
X-To: Steve Hubert <[email protected]>
X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
X-Authentication-Warning: hoser.devel.redhat.com: teg set sender to [email protected] using -f
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN

Steve Hubert <[email protected]> writes:

> Did you compile with DEBUG turned off?

Yes.

> If so, this is really a symptom of another bug.

Thanks - I'll apply your patch (checking for NULL is a nice addon
anyway, though :)

--
Trond Eivind Glomsr�d
Red Hat, Inc.

From [email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Mon, 30 Oct 2000 14:48:08 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id OAA04764;
Mon, 30 Oct 2000 14:48:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from list4.u.washington.edu ([email protected] [140.142.14.167])
by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id OAA15617;
Mon, 30 Oct 2000 14:48:06 -0800
Received: from host ([email protected] [140.142.56.13])
by list4.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id OAA27092;
Mon, 30 Oct 2000 14:45:59 -0800
Received: from mxu1.u.washington.edu (mxu1.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.8])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id OAA20196
for <[email protected]>; Mon, 30 Oct 2000 14:44:04 -0800
Received: from mxout1.cac.washington.edu (mxout1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.5])
by mxu1.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id OAA03581
for <[email protected]>; Mon, 30 Oct 2000 14:44:03 -0800
Received: from shiva2.cac.washington.edu (shiva2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.100.202])
by mxout1.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id OAA18467
for <[email protected]>; Mon, 30 Oct 2000 14:44:03 -0800
Received: from localhost (hubert@localhost)
by shiva2.cac.washington.edu (8.10.1+UW00.04/8.10.1+UW00.04) with ESMTP id e9UMi2215919
for <[email protected]>; Mon, 30 Oct 2000 14:44:03 -0800
Message-Id: <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2000 14:44:01 -0800 (PST)
Sender: [email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
From: Steve Hubert <[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Pine 4.30 now available
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT
X-To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN

Yes it is. We'll put that in. Thanks.

--
Steve Hubert <[email protected]>
Networks and Distributed Computing, Univ. of Washington, Seattle

On 30 Oct 2000, Trond Eivind Glomsr�d wrote:

> Thanks - I'll apply your patch (checking for NULL is a nice addon
> anyway, though :)

From [email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Mon, 30 Oct 2000 23:02:41 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.1])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id XAA21760;
Mon, 30 Oct 2000 23:02:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from list1.u.washington.edu ([email protected] [140.142.8.99])
by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id XAA16890;
Mon, 30 Oct 2000 23:02:39 -0800
Received: from host ([email protected] [140.142.56.13])
by list1.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id XAA24372;
Mon, 30 Oct 2000 23:01:10 -0800
Received: from mxu4.u.washington.edu (mxu4.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.8])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id WAA166666
for <[email protected]>; Mon, 30 Oct 2000 22:59:47 -0800
Received: from mailman.packetdesign.com (dns.PACKETDESIGN.NET [216.15.46.10])
by mxu4.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id WAA28494
for <[email protected]>; Mon, 30 Oct 2000 22:59:47 -0800
Received: from localhost.cisco.com (main-fw-eth1.packetdesign.com [192.168.0.254])
by mailman.packetdesign.com (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id e9V6xZQ79906;
Mon, 30 Oct 2000 22:59:35 -0800 (PST)
(envelope-from [email protected])
Message-Id: <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2000 23:21:45 -0800 (Pacific Standard Time)
Sender: [email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
From: Stephen Casner <[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
Subject: Remembered save destination
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-Sender: [email protected]
X-To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN

The new feature to remember the destination from one save operation to
the next is very handy. It would be even handier if it was remembered
across pine invocations!
-- Steve

--
-----------------------------------------------------------------
For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see:
http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/
-----------------------------------------------------------------

From [email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Mon, 30 Oct 2000 23:35:07 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.1])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id XAA13504;
Mon, 30 Oct 2000 23:35:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from list3.u.washington.edu ([email protected] [140.142.8.100])
by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id XAA17390;
Mon, 30 Oct 2000 23:35:06 -0800
Received: from host ([email protected] [140.142.56.13])
by list3.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id XAA17280;
Mon, 30 Oct 2000 23:33:59 -0800
Received: from bp15.u.washington.edu ([email protected] [140.142.15.205])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id XAA115982
for <[email protected]>; Mon, 30 Oct 2000 23:33:03 -0800
Received: from localhost (leibrand@localhost)
by bp15.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id XAA116454;
Mon, 30 Oct 2000 23:32:50 -0800
Message-Id: <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2000 23:32:50 -0800 (PST)
Reply-To: <[email protected]>
Sender: [email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
From: Scott Leibrand <[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: accents...
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-To: Seby <[email protected]>
X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
X-Sender: <[email protected]>
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN

On Sun, 29 Oct 2000, Seby wrote:

> I put the patch a compiled pine and how do i write the accents..
>
> with ^\'a doesnt work...

If you need assitance getting a patch to work, you'll need to tell us
which one it is and where you got it.

--
Scott Leibrand
[email protected] (Yes, that is a valid address.)
http://students.washington.edu/leibrand
* Opinions expressed are mine. Everyone else can get their own. :) *
* RCW 19.190 notice: This email address is located in Washington State. *
* Unsolicited commercial email may be billed $500 per message. *

From [email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Tue, 31 Oct 2000 07:28:07 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id HAA17681;
Tue, 31 Oct 2000 07:28:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from list4.u.washington.edu ([email protected] [140.142.14.167])
by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id HAA04169;
Tue, 31 Oct 2000 07:28:06 -0800
Received: from host ([email protected] [140.142.56.13])
by list4.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id HAA28270;
Tue, 31 Oct 2000 07:26:30 -0800
Received: from mxu1.u.washington.edu (mxu1.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.8])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id HAA216094
for <[email protected]>; Tue, 31 Oct 2000 07:24:45 -0800
Received: from wugate.wustl.edu (wugate.wustl.edu [128.252.120.1])
by mxu1.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id HAA20067
for <[email protected]>; Tue, 31 Oct 2000 07:24:45 -0800
Received: from library.wustl.edu (library.wustl.edu [128.252.66.1])
by wugate.wustl.edu (8.10.0.Beta12/8.10.0.Beta12) with ESMTP id e9VFOgG00785
for <[email protected]>; Tue, 31 Oct 2000 09:24:42 -0600 (CST)
Received: from localhost (jerryp@localhost)
by library.wustl.edu (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.1) with ESMTP id JAA02647
for <[email protected]>; Tue, 31 Oct 2000 09:24:43 -0600 (CST)
Message-Id: <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2000 09:24:43 -0600 (CST)
Sender: [email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
From: Jerry Pelikan <[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
Subject: Compiline pine with ldap support
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-Sender: [email protected]
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN

Is there a way to compile pine to work with the Netscape iPlanet Directory
Server? It doesn't have the liblber.a or the libldap libraries.

Jerry Pelikan [email protected]

--
-----------------------------------------------------------------
For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see:
http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/
-----------------------------------------------------------------

From [email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Tue, 31 Oct 2000 09:10:25 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id JAA29656;
Tue, 31 Oct 2000 09:10:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from list4.u.washington.edu ([email protected] [140.142.14.167])
by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id JAA07506;
Tue, 31 Oct 2000 09:10:23 -0800
Received: from host ([email protected] [140.142.56.13])
by list4.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id JAA26242;
Tue, 31 Oct 2000 09:08:40 -0800
Received: from mxu4.u.washington.edu (mxu4.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.8])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id JAA361078
for <[email protected]>; Tue, 31 Oct 2000 09:06:53 -0800
Received: from mxout1.cac.washington.edu (mxout1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.5])
by mxu4.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id JAA22470
for <[email protected]>; Tue, 31 Oct 2000 09:06:53 -0800
Received: from shiva2.cac.washington.edu (shiva2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.100.202])
by mxout1.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id JAA30942
for <[email protected]>; Tue, 31 Oct 2000 09:06:53 -0800
Received: from localhost (hubert@localhost)
by shiva2.cac.washington.edu (8.10.1+UW00.04/8.10.1+UW00.04) with ESMTP id e9VH6qs21860
for <[email protected]>; Tue, 31 Oct 2000 09:06:52 -0800
Message-Id: <Pine.GUL.4.31.0010310905050.21671-100000@shiva2.cac.washington.edu>
Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2000 09:06:51 -0800 (PST)
Sender: [email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
From: Steve Hubert <[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Compiline pine with ldap support
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN

The binaries have LDAP client code included. If you are compiling pine
from source you will have to supply an LDAP library. OpenLDAP is the most
likely choice. Once you have a pine (or other client) with LDAP client
support, it should work with any LDAP Directory server. Did I understand
the question?

--
Steve Hubert <[email protected]>
Networks and Distributed Computing, Univ. of Washington, Seattle

On Tue, 31 Oct 2000, Jerry Pelikan wrote:

> Is there a way to compile pine to work with the Netscape iPlanet Directory
> Server? It doesn't have the liblber.a or the libldap libraries.
>
> Jerry Pelikan [email protected]

From [email protected] Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Tue, 31 Oct 2000 10:29:33 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1])
by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW00.01) with ESMTP id KAA30532;
Tue, 31 Oct 2000 10:29:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from list4.u.washington.edu ([email protected] [140.142.14.167])
by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id KAA10127;
Tue, 31 Oct 2000 10:29:31 -0800
Received: from host ([email protected] [140.142.56.13])
by list4.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with SMTP id KAA26328;
Tue, 31 Oct 2000 10:27:59 -0800
Received: from mxu3.u.washington.edu (mxu3.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.7])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id KAA204078
for <[email protected]>; Tue, 31 Oct 2000 10:20:09 -0800
Received: from alpha.circinus.com ([email protected] [63.114.74.91])
by mxu3.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id KAA12330
for <[email protected]>; Tue, 31 Oct 2000 10:19:28 -0800
Received: from localhost (nemo@localhost)
by alpha.circinus.com (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA20622
for <[email protected]>; Tue, 31 Oct 2000 10:19:22 -0800 (PST)
Message-Id: <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2000 10:19:22 -0800 (PST)
Sender: [email protected]
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <http://www.washington.edu/computing/listproc/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20pine-info>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=subscribe%20pine-info%20YourName>
List-Owner: <mailto:[email protected]> (Human contact for the list)
List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
From: Nemo <[email protected]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
Subject: error compiling pine..
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GUL.4.31.0010310905050.21671-100000@shiva2.cac.washington.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email protected]>
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN

Hi, I'm having problems compiling it...

command is ./build gs5 for Solaris 8 and gcc
especially this error: make: Fatal error: Don't know how to make target
`../c-client/c-client.a'

gcc -g -O2 -c unix.c
gcc -g -O2 -c mbox.c
gcc -g -O2 -c mbx.c
mbx.c: In function `mbx_hdrpos':
mbx.c:1371: internal error--unrecognizable insn:
(insn 78 76 80 (set (reg:SI 129)
(minus:SI (const_int 4 [0x4])
(const_int -4096 [0xfffff000]))) -1 (nil)
(expr_list:REG_EQUAL (const_int 4100 [0x1004])
(nil)))
*** Error code 1
make: Fatal error: Command failed for target `mbx.o'
Current working directory /export/src/pine4.30/imap/c-client
*** Error code 1
make: Fatal error: Command failed for target `gso'
Current working directory /export/src/pine4.30/imap/c-client
*** Error code 1
make: Fatal error: Command failed for target `OSTYPE'
Current working directory /export/src/pine4.30/imap
*** Error code 1
make: Fatal error: Command failed for target `gso'

Making Pico and Pilot
make CC=gcc -f makefile.gso

Making Pine.
make CC=gcc LDAPLIBS=../ldap/libraries/libldap.a
./ldap/libraries/liblber.a LDAPCFLAGS=-DENABLE_LDAP -I../ldap/include -f
makefile.gs5
make: Fatal error: Don't know how to make target `../c-client/c-client.a'

Links to executables are in bin directory:
size: bin/pine: cannot open
size: bin/mtest: cannot open
size: bin/imapd: cannot open
bin/pico: 288685 + 5724 + 4088 = 298497
bin/pilot: 285901 + 5596 + 4088 = 295585
Done

--
-----------------------------------------------------------------
For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see:
http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/
-----------------------------------------------------------------