WEBDAV Working Group
         Munich IETF
         August 11, 1997

         A meeting of the World Wide Web Distributed Authoring and
         Versioning (WEBDAV) Working Group was held at the Munich IETF on
         August 11, 1997.  Jim Whitehead chaired the meeting, and Del
         Jensen recorded meeting notes.  Over the duration of the meeting
         there were 54 attendees.  These minutes, the agenda, and slides
         presented during the meeting are accessible on the Web at URL
         <http://www.ics.uci.edu/~ejw/authoring/munich/>.

         The meeting began with a review of the agenda, which was accepted
         without modification.  Following this, Jim Whitehead began a
         series of three presentations.  The first presentation was a
         brief high-level overview of the functionality being considered
         by the WEBDAV working group.  This included information on the
         status of the requirements document, which should have a new
         version out by August 27, 1997, the protocol document, which
         should have a new draft out by August 29, 1997, and the scenarios
         document, on which work has stalled.  It is expected that the
         requirements document will begin a working group last call after
         this next draft has been released.  This is the final step before
         forwarding this document along to the IESG.

         After this presentation, Jim Whitehead gave another presentation
         outlining the key design elements of the properties, collections,
         and namespace operations aspects of the protocol specification.
         Notes on this presentation follow:

          1. Properties
            a. Definition and structure
            b. New methods

          2. Collections
            a. Definition and structure

         Q: Why have internal members?  Why are not all members specified
         as external (absolute URIs)?
         A: The well-defined specification of existing methods on external
         members can be problematic across namespace boundaries.  Internal
         membership is convenient for modeling file system behavior, which
         one anticipates to be a common use for collections.  Container
         models that are more exotic than the simple hierarchical model
         are not excluded by the proposed structure for collections.
            b. Methods

          3. The Source Link

         Once the two overview presentations were completed, Jim Whitehead
         led a discussion of open issues using slides which listed the
         issue, gave pro and con discussion on the issue, and then listed
         a recommended resolution to the issue.  Discussion on these
         issues is summarized below -- for more detail consult the






         original slide presentation.

          A. Property Instance URL encoding
              Problem:  Get rid of the DAV switch
              Solution: Discovery of Property names
              Informal Poll: Adopted

          B. Retrieval of Properties
              Problem:  Search is too complicated for WEBDAV scope
              Solution: Simplified set of methods to retrieve property
                        names and values on a by-resource basis.
              Informal Poll: Adopted

          C. Property Attributes
              Problem:  Resource level granularity for property attributes
                        (e.g., live, readonly) can make schemas
                        inconsistent
              Solution: Raise attribute granularity to schema level.
              Informal Poll: Adopted

          D. Method Recursive Semantics for Collections
              Problem:  Agreement on well-defined extension of current
                        methods is hard to get, and aspects of this
                        problem are arguably outside the scope of WEBDAV.
              Solution: Define only "level 0" behavior.
              Informal Poll: Adopted

          E. Atomic Locking of Collections
              Problem:  The current requirements document specifies that
                        WEBDAV provide this functionality.  The protocol
                        draft may provide only a partial solution.
              Solution: None

          F. Support for Variants
              Problem:  The current specification is silent on how to add
                        or change resource variants.
              Solution: None at present, take to list (possibilities:
                        transparent content negotiation, content-location
                        header, translation-of/supercedes relationships)

         *** Meeting adjourned ***