Provisioning Registry Protocol WG (provreg)

Wednesday, August 08 at 1530-1730
==================================

CHAIRS: Jaap Akkerhuis <[email protected]>
       Ed Lewis <[email protected]>

AGENDA:

The usual: bashing (the agenda) & document/wg status.........15 minutes
    Selection of minute taker
          (http://www.ietf.org/instructions/minutes.html)
    Requirements document status, comments from IESG
    The missing documents (e.g., mapping of EPP to BEEP)

OPP draft, comparison w/EPP and GRRP (James).................25 minutes
    http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-jseng-provreg-opp-00.txt
    Discussion: How does this fit into WG plans?  Should this be admitted
    to the group?

Discussion on Data Collection Requirements (Scott)...........20 minutes
    http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-provreg-grrp-reqs-02.txt
    http://www.cafax.se/ietf-provreg/maillist/2001-07/msg00002.html
    Discussion: a clarification of requirements generated by a dilemma
    in protocol design.

EPP drafts, outside deadlines................................20 minutes
    http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-provreg-epp-04.txt
    http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-provreg-epp-*-02.txt
    (See http://www.ietf.org/html.charters/provreg-charter.html)

XRP draft, comparison w/EPP and GRRP (Eric)..................25 minutes
    http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-brunner-xrp-00.txt
    Discussion: How does this fit into WG plans?  Should this be admitted
    to the group?

Implementaion-to-date commentary (?).........................15 minutes
    Discussion: comments are sought on the state of implementations of
    the proposals.  (Volunteers sought.)
                                                           ============
                                                              2 hours

Other Items that may creep into the agenda (but haven't been allotted time
yet:

    The Definitions document
    http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-provreg-dn-defn-01.txt
    Discussion: originally thought to accompany the requirements, but now
    having a separate document seems like overkill.  This may slip into
    document status (unless the author wishes to speak).

    Report from RIR's on provreg
    I've asked for the RIR viewpoint on Provreg matters, but didn't give
    the contact person much advance warning.  Hopefully we can hear from
    that group - if they have time to prepare.  If we do have a report,
    5 minutes could be knocked off the OPP and XRP items (as they are the
    longest).

You are viewing proxied material from ftp.icm.edu.pl. The copyright of proxied material belongs to its original authors. Any comments or complaints in relation to proxied material should be directed to the original authors of the content concerned. Please see the disclaimer for more details.