Layer 2 Virtual Private Networks (l2vpn)
----------------------------------------
Charter
Last Modified: 2005-10-27
Current Status: Active Working Group
Chair(s):
Shane Amante <
[email protected]>
Vach Kompella <
[email protected]>
Internet Area Director(s):
Jari Arkko <
[email protected]>
Mark Townsley <
[email protected]>
Internet Area Advisor:
Mark Townsley <
[email protected]>
Technical Advisor(s):
Russ Housley <
[email protected]>
Alex Zinin <
[email protected]>
Mailing Lists:
General Discussion:
[email protected]
To Subscribe:
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/l2vpn
Archive:
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/l2vpn/index.html
Description of Working Group:
Alex Zinin is the routing advisor.
Russ Housley is the security advisor.
This working group is responsible for defining and specifying a
limited number of solutions for supporting provider-provisioned
layer-2 virtual private networks (L2VPNs).
The WG is responsible for standardization of the following solutions:
1. Virtual Private LAN Service (VPLS)--L2 service that emulates LAN
across an IP and an MPLS-enabled IP network, allowing standard
Ethernet devices communicate with each other as if they were
connected to a common LAN segment.
2. Virtual Private Wire Service (VPWS)--L2 service that provides L2
point-to-point connectivity (e.g. Frame Relay DLCI, ATM VPI/VCI,
point-to-point Ethernet) across an IP and an MPLS-enabled IP
network.
3. IP-only VPNs -- An L2 service across an IP and MPLS-enabled IP
network, allowing standard IP devices to communicate with each
other as if they were connected to a common LAN or with some mesh
of point-to-point circuits (not necessarily fully meshed). The WG
will address both of the following cases:
- the customer attachment uses the same L2 protocol at all
attachment points in the L2VPN.
- the customer attachment uses different L2 protocols at the
attachment points in the L2VPN. This case is intended to address
the needs of service providers who may start out with a single L2
protocol at attachment points, but wish to incrementally upgrade
individual attachment points over time to newer technologies. This
is a restricted form of "interworking" that is limited to
providing the facilities necessary to carry IP over the L2VPN;
general L2 interworking is not in scope.
The WG will address intra-AS scenarios only at this point (other
scenarios will be considered for inclusion in the updated charter when
the current one is completed.)
As a general rule, the WG will not create new protocols, but will
provide functional requirements for extensions of the existing
protocols that will be discussed in the protocol-specific WGs.
As a specific example, this WG will not define new encapsulation
mechanism, but will use those defined in the PWE3 WG.
L2VPN WG will review proposed protocol extensions for L2VPNs before
they are recommended to appropriate protocol-specific WGs.
The WG will work on the following items. Adding new work items will
require rechartering.
1. Discovery of PEs participating in L2 service, and topology of
required connectivity
2. Signaling of l2vpn related information for the purpose of
setup and maintenance of l2vpn circuits. As much as possible
PWE3 signaling procedures should be used
3. Solution documents (providing the framework for a specific
solution, should include info on how discovery, signaling,
and encaps work together, include security, AS as a separate
document)
4. MIBs
5. L2VPN-specific OAM extensions--extensions to existing OAM
solutions for VPLS, VPWS, and IP-only L2VPNs.
Where necessary, the WG will coordinate its activities with IEEE 802.1
Goals and Milestones:
Aug 2003 Submit an I-D describing MIB for VPLS
Aug 2003 Submit an I-D describing MIB for VPWS
Aug 2003 Submit an I-D on OAM for VPLS
Aug 2003 Submit an I-D on OAM for VPWS
Oct 2003 Submit L2 requirements to IESG for publication as Informational
RFC
Done Identify VPLS and VPWS solutions for the WG
Done Submit L2 framework to IESG for publication as Informational
RFC
Dec 2003 Submit VPLS solution documents to IESG
Dec 2003 Submit VPWS solution documents to IESG
Jan 2004 Submit IP-only L2VPN solution documents to IESG
Feb 2004 Submit MIB for VPLS to IESG
Feb 2004 Submit MIB for VPWS to IESG
Mar 2004 Submit OAM for VPWS to IESG
Mar 2004 Submit OAM for VPLS to IESG
Apr 2004 Submit OAM for IP L2VPN to IESG
Internet-Drafts:
Posted Revised I-D Title <Filename>
------ ------- --------------------------------------------
May 2003 Jun 2006 <draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-bgp-08.txt>
Virtual Private LAN Service (VPLS) Using BGP for Auto-discovery
and Signaling
Jun 2003 Jun 2006 <draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-ldp-09.txt>
Virtual Private LAN Services Using LDP
Sep 2003 May 2006 <draft-ietf-l2vpn-signaling-08.txt>
Provisioning, Autodiscovery, and Signaling in L2VPNs
Oct 2004 Aug 2006 <draft-ietf-l2vpn-arp-mediation-07.txt>
ARP Mediation for IP Interworking of Layer 2 VPN
Oct 2005 Jul 2006 <draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpws-iw-oam-01.txt>
OAM Procedures for VPWS Interworking
Oct 2005 Oct 2006 <draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-mcast-reqts-03.txt>
Requirements for Multicast Support in Virtual Private LAN
Services
Jul 2006 Nov 2006 <draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-bridge-interop-01.txt>
VPLS Interoperability with CE Bridges
Aug 2006 Aug 2006 <draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-pim-snooping-00.txt>
PIM Snooping over VPLS
Request For Comments:
RFC Stat Published Title
------- -- ----------- ------------------------------------
RFC4665 I Sep 2006 Service Requirements for Layer 2 Provider Provisioned
Virtual Private Networks
RFC4664 I Sep 2006 Framework for Layer 2 Virtual Private Networks (L2VPNs)