Public-Key Infrastructure (X.509) WG (pkix)

WEDNESDAY, August 2 at 1400-1600
================================

CHAIRS: Stephen Kent <[email protected]>
       Tim Polk <[email protected]>


AGENDA:

1. WG Status and Direction

1.1 Document Status Review [Tim Polk (NIST)]

      The working group has a number of Internet-Drafts at various
      stages in the IETF process. (10 min.)

2. PKIX WG Specifications

2.1 3280bis Status
       Tim Polk (NIST)
  http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-pkix-rfc3280bis-01.txt

     A new draft has been submitted with relatively minor enhancements.
     Several open issues remain to be resolved.  In particular, questions
     involving name ambiguity have been raised, particularly as they
     impact CRL validation.
     (10 min.)

2.2  3280bis Open Issues
      Denis Pinkas
       (no draft)

     This presentation will focus on the open issues currently under
     discussion with respect to 3280bis. (10 min.)

2.3   Simple Certificate Validation Protocol (SCVP)
      Tim Polk (NIST)
        http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-pkix-scvp-19.txt

     IPR issues have been resolved since the last IETF meeting, but the
     core specification has not changed significantly since the -18 draft.
     The draft meets the requirements specified in RFC 3379, but consensus
     has not been demonstrated for several issues raised on the list.
     (10 min.)

2.4  SCVP Open Issues
      Denis Pinkas
       (no draft)

     This presentation will focus on the open issues currently under
     discussion with respect to SCVP. (10 min.)

2.5  SRV RR Issues
       Stefan Santesson (Microsoft)
       (no draft)

     A new requirement for an SRV RR othername has been identified.  The
     presenter will explain the requirement and proposed approach for
     satisfying the requirement.
     (10 min.)

3. Related Specifications & Liasion Presentations

     Time allowing, liasion presentations will be accomodated to ensure the
     PKIX WG is aware of related specifications currently progressing as
     individual drafts.

   3.1 CMS Advanced Electronic Signatures (CAdES)
       Denis Pinkas (on behalf of ETSI TC ESI)
         (no draft)

     This document is based on RFC 3126 and is aligned with a re-issue of
     ETSI TS 101 733.
     (10 min.)

   3.2 XKMS
       Stephen Farrell (on behalf of W3C)
         (no draft)

     This presentation will provide an update on the progression of the
     XKMS specifiation within W3C.
     (5 min.)