Subj : ipv6 resolvability
To : David Gonzalez
From : Michiel van der Vlist
Date : Tue Nov 19 2024 11:37 am
Hello David,
On Sunday November 17 2024 22:55, you wrote to me:
MV>> Are you sure you can't get more than just a /64? If not, for me
MV>> that would be a reason to take my bussines elsewhere...
DG> Yup, trust me, been there, done that, but that unfortunately is the
DG> only one that you can get to do bridge mode on the CPE for IPv4,
What type of fysical connection do you have? DSL over 600 Ohm 2 wire? DOCSIS
over coax? Opical over glasfiber?
I am in the fortunate position to have a choice between the three. Although DSL
is no longer interesting compared to coax or fiberglass.
DG> we're way behind down here in South America (except Brazil) when it
DG> comes to v6, as I said I throw hate everytime I can to those grumpy
DG> old-men with their brains stuck on IPv4 and the /30 and v4 VLSM
DG> practices migrated to IPv6.
There are only two IPv6 capable Fidonet nodes in Z4. The first is your ZC elect
Fernando Toledo. You are the second.
DG> The otehr issue I do not want to rn n into is using Tunnelbroker, it's
DG> slow because of it's 6to4 tunnel nature, but it's an alternative, I do
DG> like HE, but being a VPN and its inherent drawbacks drives me away.
He.net has been providing a fantatic service to the IPv6 community. I have had
an he.net tunnel for many years. When I finally got native IPv6 in 2016 I did
not need them any more. But I am still gratefull for here fantastic service.
They even managed to get the "sage T-shirt" delivered exactly on the day of my
70th birthday!
