Subj : Re: zone 4 ping
To : Ward Dossche
From : Dan Clough
Date : Wed Mar 20 2024 07:47 am
-=> Ward Dossche wrote to Dan Clough <=-
DC> There was talk quite recently about this, and somebody... <ahem> seemed
DC> to imply that it wasn't possible, or that it "hadn't been long enough"
DC> that the existing ZC was AWOL...
WD> Again some *C I expect not willing to face reality ... do I know
WD> him/her?
Yes. See below.
DC> If there are only 2 RCs left, doesn't 1 of them make a majority/quorum?
DC> It's my opinion that it does. With the circumstances thrown in (obvious
DC> neglect / disappearance), it pretty much is beyond question.
WD> P4 mentions that a majority is more than 50% of those voting. If
WD> there are 2 RCs 'live' and one votes and the otherone not, then
WD> there is no majority.
Perhaps you missed the reference to "circumstances" above?
DC> Okay, let's do that. Wave the magic wand, dissolve Z4, and put the
DC> survivors in Z3, with Fernando as the RC. Done.
WD> * Dissolving Z4 are your words, not mine
WD> * Adding orphaned nets to R34 would linguistically make more
WD> sense * Although Z3 is a live entity, reaching its ZC can be a
WD> challenge as well,
WD> but at least he replies after a while and acts upon things.
WD> * "we" are not involved, it must come from Z4-sysops
Yes. See above.
Or, look the other way. Because.... that is easier.
... Wisdom is knowing what to do with what you know.
=== MultiMail/Linux v0.52
--- SBBSecho 3.20-Linux
* Origin: Palantir * palantirbbs.ddns.net * Pensacola, FL * (1:135/115)
