Subj : Re: No compression to one node
To   : Marc Lewis
From : Rob Swindell
Date : Wed Oct 31 2018 04:33 am

 Re: Re: No compression to one node
 By: Marc Lewis to Torsten Bamberg on Tue Oct 30 2018 07:08 pm

>  TB> If you want to sent netmail without compression, do a 'squish out'
>  TB> without 'squash'.
>
> Yes, and the same is true for an EchoMail outbound scan, but the outbound
> directory would become a nightmare. It's a Binkley style outbound and
> Binkley  doesn't recognise uncompressed packets IIRC;

BSO recognizes/supports uncompressed packets (e.g. outbound/*.out) just fine.

> MarK Lewis pointed out that now-a-days it hardly makes sense to waste
> compute  cycles to archive outbound packets due to the connectivity via the
> internet now
> commonly utilised; but still, there are traditional Binkley based mailers
> that  require compressed mail bundles with their attendant .?LO files.

That would weird considering the original Binkley mailer (BinkleyTerm) did not
(require compressed mail bundles).

                                           digital man

Synchronet "Real Fact" #83:
Donations to the Synchronet project are welcome @ http://wiki.synchro.net/donate
Norco, CA WX: 68.9�F, 16.0% humidity, 5 mph SW wind, 0.00 inches rain/24hrs

You are viewing proxied material from cvs.synchro.net. The copyright of proxied material belongs to its original authors. Any comments or complaints in relation to proxied material should be directed to the original authors of the content concerned. Please see the disclaimer for more details.