Subj : Re: Routing Problem
To   : Mvan Le
From : Dale Shipp
Date : Sat Jan 05 2008 11:05 pm

-=> On 01-05-08  21:47,  Mvan Le <=-
-=> spoke to Dale Shipp about Re: Routing Problem <=-

 I think that we have a mis-understanding of what I have been asking
 and the intent of what I wish to happen.   Much of what you said makes
 sense, and would allow my Argus to send direct to multiple nodes if
 that is what I desired -- but it is not what I desire.

ML> Otherwise you will need to manually define a node & IP entry for
ML> 1:275/100  (et al) in Argus configuration so that if it finds a file
ML> named 01130064.*o it will know where to send it.

  I have done that for a few nodes -- but the whole point of my
  starting this discussion was that I want mail destined for any other
  node to be routed out through 1:123/500.   That is not happening, no
  matter how I twiddle with the ROUTE.CFG that Squish is supposed to
  look at.


DS> My route.cfg file has a lot of standard comments in it.   Here is
DS> what remains after they are removed:

DS> Send Normal World
DS> Route           normal   1:123/500 1:All 2:All
DS> 3:All 4:All 5:All 6:ALL
DS> Send            Crash   1:140/1
DS> Send     Crash   1:261/1
DS> Send            Crash   1:261/38
DS> Send            normal   1:123/500

DS> I have tried altering the order, and changing the flavor to 1:123/500
DS> to crash instead of normal the two times it appears.   No effect on
DS> behavior -- mail still gets stuck without being routed.

ML> Order is important.

ML> Try this,

ML> =================
ML> Send Normal World
ML> #End Route.Cfg
ML> =================

ML> Ie. "Send Normal World" is the only command you need. You
ML> don't need all the other Send commands unless you want to
ML> specifically alter the flavour of the packet for those
<node> <nodes ...> (in this case netmail message), for
ML> example when you're a NC or hub and want to alter passthru
ML> messages.

 The problem is that I do want to alter the routing (not the flavor) of
 packets for all other nodes not explicitly mentioned.

ML> The way you currently have Route.Cfg set up, ie.

ML> ==============================================
ML> Send Normal World
ML> Route           normal   1:123/500 1:All 2:All
ML> 3:All 4:All 5:All 6:ALL
ML> Send            Crash   1:140/1
ML> Send     Crash   1:261/1
ML> Send            Crash   1:261/38
ML> Send            normal   1:123/500
ML> ==============================================

ML> All your mail is getting re-addressed to 1:123/500, so the
ML> other Send commands have no effect.

 But the point is that it is *not* getting re-addressed to 1:123/500 as
 I intend to happen.

ML> Anyway, your problem is to do with Argus. You need to define the
ML> destination  node & IP addresses in Argus. If it doesn't know about the
ML> destination, your packet will just get stuck in the
ML> outbound directory. And check that the crash netmail
ML> message is created in your outbound directory with *.cut
ML> extension.

 The destination node and IP address for 1:123/500 is defined in Argus.
 The others are not, because I do not intend for mail to be sent
 directly to them -- rather I intend for it to be routed through
 1:123/500.




... Shipwrecked on Hesperus in Columbia, Maryland. 23:18:15, 05 Jan 2007
___ Blue Wave/DOS v2.30

--- Maximus/NT 3.01
* Origin: Owl's Anchor (1:261/1466)