Subj : Squish Archiving
To : Bob Jones
From : Dieter Ringhofer
Date : Fri Jan 06 2006 02:12 pm
Am Donnerstag, 05 Januar 2006 schrieb Bob Jones an Marty Blankenship:
BJ>> The two "Send Direct" lines should come before the
MB>> "Send Normal" line. If
BJ>> 92:602/100 and 510:507/0 are the nodes seeing the ...
MB>> Originally I had the send normal line after the send direct lines. I
BJ> I suspect that with Squish being 4D and not 5D aware, along with trying to
BJ> run a single copy of squish is the problem.
Be ensured: No, it isn't.
Have a look at my description in previous posting and watch sequence as well as
'unneeded' route/send combination. I never used a 'world' statement.
Doing it the way mentioned Squish will work fine in an environment where
- 5D setup is used (i.e. binkd is a simple drop-in for multiple networks)
- more than 10 networks have been served
- multiple ftn-gateways between multiple networks are running
- within Fido even zonegating has been done via a point AKA (!)
- remember Fido-Putsch in 90's over here in Germany. I 'zonegated' all zones.
- system is everything from point system to central host (zone)
Not doing it this way Squish *will* cause trouble for sure with very few
networks (might be two or three).
JFI:
My largest route.cfg had more than 100 kB size without need of any tracker like
Itrack. I use Itrack since I became too lazy to maintain Squish in such an
extend but there's is no real need for it ...
cu, Dieter
---
* Origin: Wndos s god fr cmnicaton (2:2476/14)
