Subj : JS Object save_msg()
To   : Digital Man
From : deon
Date : Mon Dec 23 2024 07:20 am

 Re: JS Object save_msg()
 By: Digital Man to deon on Sat Dec 21 2024 04:59 pm

Howdy,

> No, it doesn't. The JS when_written_time property is still a time_t
> representation - I do the conversion (encoding upon assignemnt, decoding
> upon use) to the SMB date storage automatically for you.

Actually I was refering to the post implementation of your changes to when_written_time - from your commit example:

Here's an example from smbutil v of a message header posted after this change:
 when_written     03292595 41E0 Fri Dec 20 18:22:21 2024 PST

0x03292595 (53028245) is the now new value of when_written_time right? and time() will return a number like 1734898576, which will always be less.

But I think I get you, when I read a when_written_time, it'll convert back to time_t value like time()?


...����

---
� Synchronet � AnsiTEX bringing back videotex but with ANSI