Subj : JS Object save_msg()
To : Digital Man
From : deon
Date : Mon Dec 23 2024 07:20 am
Re: JS Object save_msg()
By: Digital Man to deon on Sat Dec 21 2024 04:59 pm
Howdy,
> No, it doesn't. The JS when_written_time property is still a time_t
> representation - I do the conversion (encoding upon assignemnt, decoding
> upon use) to the SMB date storage automatically for you.
Actually I was refering to the post implementation of your changes to when_written_time - from your commit example:
Here's an example from smbutil v of a message header posted after this change:
when_written 03292595 41E0 Fri Dec 20 18:22:21 2024 PST
0x03292595 (53028245) is the now new value of when_written_time right? and time() will return a number like 1734898576, which will always be less.
But I think I get you, when I read a when_written_time, it'll convert back to time_t value like time()?
...����
---
� Synchronet � AnsiTEX bringing back videotex but with ANSI