Subj : Re: Something..
To : mark lewis
From : joseph larsen
Date : Sat Oct 10 2015 03:34 pm
|01 ��۲������ �� �|CR�� quoting |09mark lewis |01on |0910/09/15 |01...|C
ml> does the index actually store the message's status (local, sent,
ml> private, etc) or is that in the header file? i see that it reads the
ml> index and looks to be checking the status there instead of from the
ml> header... if the message base operation is like others and the index is
ml> just an index, i suspect that you need to read the index, load the
ml> header for the message the index is pointing to, then check the status
ml> of the message and scan it out if needed after which the header would be
ml> rewritten with the scanned attribute being turned on and then move on to
ml> the next index position to read that number and load the next header...
ml> but that's just a guess as i'm not familiar with "imp" and can't recall
ml> what full name it may have...
ml>
You know, I have absolutely no idea. I just want to know why the "writec" and
"writeln" functions aren't working the way they should. I shouldn't have to
use strace to see them. Any ideas? I love Impulse BBS. Which is why I ported
it to Linux. The next big obsticle is getting message replies working. Then I
need to get echomail working with it. Then i'm done, and can start using it
as my main BBS.